Slashdot Mirror


Audi Gives Silent Electric Car Synthetic Sound

itwbennett writes "Audi's electric cars are quiet, maybe too quiet, which is why Audi spent 3 years creating replicated engine noise for its electric car models. We're so conditioned to the noise of an engine revving that a driver behind the wheel of a too-quiet car may not realize how fast he's driving, and a pedestrian relying on auditory clues may be unaware of an approaching vehicle, says Ralf Kunkel, Head of Audi Acoustics." Nissan's been on this for years (as has Honda); one day, you may only get to choose which noise your car makes, rather than whether it does.

402 comments

  1. How cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sounds like every SF car ever. I love it.

    1. Re:How cool. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nyan Cat.

      Nothing else says "get out of my way' like that would.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:How cool. by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I see a huge modding community on the horizon...
      It's all fun and game until

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
    3. Re:How cool. by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...Rickrolling while revving at a redlight occurs.

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
    4. Re:How cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doppler effect of Nyan Cat car would be funny

    5. Re:How cool. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jetson's car.

      FTW.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:How cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea., I'll rick-roll the office elevator. That will cheer people up on Friday the 13th.

    7. Re:How cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first thought, too.

    8. Re:How cool. by Moryath · · Score: 4, Informative

      More stupid laws brought to you by the buggy whip manufacturer's cartel.

      Really, this is just stupid shit all over again.

    9. Re:How cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a true nylan car would be one that farts out rainbows out of the exhaust pipe!

    10. Re:How cool. by Sperbels · · Score: 2

      You mean a blaring voice that says: Danger! Danger! Vehicle Approaching! Stand Aside Citizen!

    11. Re:How cool. by gnick · · Score: 1

      Counter-productive. If watching 'Weeds' taught me anything it's that semi-silent hybrids help with drive-bys. There has to be a market for that.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    12. Re:How cool. by Medievalist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, George Jetson's car would be the best, but second best would be the buzz-saw noise that the old Flash Gordon spaceships made.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUbGkSfaKrs

      Hardly anyone would recognize it, but it that might make it even better!

    13. Re:How cool. by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. We should also look back at the old looks at laws to have artificial horse heads mounted to cars to not scare horses back in the day.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    14. Re:How cool. by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At one time there were laws insisting that anyone driving a "new-fangled horseless carriage" must:

      - have someone walk ahead of them waving a red flag or lantern.
      - shouting to warn others of the approaching vehicle
      - honking a horn or otherwise making noise to "warn" oncoming traffic at any intersection.

      The horse and buggy whip cartels also insisted that the automobile would "spook horses" and cause all sorts of problems. As it turned out, of course, the horses didn't give a rat's ass about the cars, they were more likely to spook because some idiot hitched up a mare in heat and some other idiot had an un-gelded stallion on the rein, or because some asshole shot off a gun near them.

      The nonsense about electric cars is no different. It's just attempts by the lobbying department of interested automobile makers (the ones who aren't adapting to the 21st century) using bribed republicans and regulatory capture to try to create artificial barriers to adoption against their competition.

    15. Re:How cool. by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because only the death squads that come for you after curfew when martial law is enacted will have the totally silent cars.

    16. Re:How cool. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2
      How about just the theme song from Flash Gordon? That should turn a few heads...

      FLASH!!! AAaaaaAAA!!!!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    17. Re:How cool. by durrr · · Score: 2

      I see your nyan cat and raise you a screaming car.
      Flavours to chose from: terrified female, suffering male, 'little girl on christmas', tarzan and 'last minute of a burning passenger plane'. Although that last one will probably be relabled 'rollercoaster'

    18. Re:How cool. by haystor · · Score: 1

      Peter Gunn or you'll never sell me one.

      --
      t
    19. Re:How cool. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Ominous "stand aside or perish in a horrible pile of gore!" would sound so much more convincing.

      You just know that every SUV and truck will use that.

    20. Re:How cool. by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      If it's going to have a sci-fi sound, though, why not go all the way. I'm currently torn between Landspeeder and Tie Fighter.

      I mean, VW/Audi already has the licensing rights for its commercials, why not take the next logical step: "Audi e-tron Star Wars Edition". Available in Darth Vader black, Yoda Green, or Orange-and-White Rebellion Sport.

    21. Re:How cool. by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      What, like the Sound Racer with an external speaker? Yeah...

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    22. Re:How cool. by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Given wifi/bluetooth and insecure car networks, the "modding" possibilities of that annoying car that just cut you off are tremendous.

    23. Re:How cool. by ulski · · Score: 1

      This audio system and external speakers uses extra electricity. I hope they have though about designing it to automatically switch itself of at higher speeds (tire and wind noise would be sufficient as a warning sound at higher speeds anyway) You would only want to switch on the sound system when the car is driving slowly (in a parking lot )

    24. Re:How cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Looks at car*

      *Looks at video of TROLOLOLO*

      *Gets smug troll face*

    25. Re:How cool. by Inda · · Score: 1

      The sound of the Hypnotoad!!!

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    26. Re:How cool. by konaya · · Score: 1

      ...until someone's car is in a pile-up addicent and, when the dust has settled, plays multikill.wav from Unreal Tournament?

  2. any sound in the world.... by turtledawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and they chose car noise. How uninspiring.

    --
    Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    1. Re:any sound in the world.... by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All I want to know is if I can I turn it off? (without breaking some law...)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:any sound in the world.... by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 0

      Yeah, exactly. And if there is a law, how can we either circumvent it (no, sorry, that speaker broke just some minutes ago Officer) or get rid of it.

    3. Re:any sound in the world.... by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      and they chose car noise. How uninspiring.

      Personally, I love the sound of my V8 revving up. But I also hate how much it costs to do that :)

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:any sound in the world.... by BagOBones · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly why would it need to sound like a regular car.

      Spend any time down town Vancouver and you will start to appreciate them having a little sound of some kind... Something like over 50% of the cabs in Vancouver are Toyota Prius and they sneak up on you all day long as a pedestrian.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    5. Re:any sound in the world.... by Jeng · · Score: 0

      From what I understand the car sounds best achieve their goals.

      They wanted something death people would perceive as a car.

      And

      They wanted something that people driving will associate the sound with them going faster so they are aware of their speed.

      As it is though I expect the modding community to have an absolute blast with this. Expect really annoying sounds whose pitch will vary with the speed of the car.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    6. Re:any sound in the world.... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, exactly. And if there is a law, how can we either circumvent it (no, sorry, that speaker broke just some minutes ago Officer) or get rid of it.

      I doubt you would be prosecuted for having "too quiet" a vehicle... that is, until you hit someone with it because they couldn't hear you coming.

      That happens, be prepared for a criminal negligence charge.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wanted something death people would perceive as a car.

      I don't think the dead really care. :-)

    8. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wanted something death people...

      No... not yet.

    9. Re:any sound in the world.... by Surt · · Score: 2

      If it doesn't sound like a car, do you know to jump out of the way?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:any sound in the world.... by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 5, Funny

      They wanted something death people would perceive as a car.

      I think you meant to type "deaf people". And I think you meant to mean to type "blind people". Y'know, the ones that would get clues about their surroundings by listening to the new artificial sounds for silent-running cars?

    11. Re:any sound in the world.... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Exactly why would it need to sound like a regular car.

      So people who are blind or vision impaired can hear it coming and know it's a car.

    12. Re:any sound in the world.... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      So this being done for zombies? Otherwise why would dead people care?

      And, yes, I know you meant 'deaf' but that makes even less sense than your typo.

    13. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! That's why they make the bird chirp noise for when the walk sign comes on at an intersection.

      Oh wait... no... that wasn't why. Yet blind people figured it out somehow. Maybe with something called... ...an audiobook? Or braille book? Beats me!

    14. Re:any sound in the world.... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Then stop jaywalking?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    15. Re:any sound in the world.... by Hatta · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you can't be bothered to look both ways before crossing the street, it's you who are negligent. The only exception is the blind, and we have audible crosswalks now, so this technology is pointless.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:any sound in the world.... by gnick · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. I think visual cues would be much more useful to the deaf. The deaf only rarely care what something sounds like...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    17. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I abhor the sound of a V8. I would much rather have a car that sounds like ramjet!

    18. Re:any sound in the world.... by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Sounds like "Oh sorry officer; my light broke just now", or "Yeah the doorlock JUST broke off one minute ago".

      And then you can of course claim justice, but they won't give it to you and you're fscked. Or you pay an ever more pricey lawyer.

      --
      Here be signatures
    19. Re:any sound in the world.... by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Car needed to make noise. Car.... noise.... noise that cars make.... car noise?

      What did you expect? MP3 functionality? What about hearing Justin Bieber come by you everytime a pube drives his car past your block? -_-

      --
      Here be signatures
    20. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you were able to point out that someone was probably using modern technology to "swipe" on their electronic touchpad, and it corrected their words to be something other than what he/she meant. But then you made fun of them because you're a jackass. Stick to the damn point of the article, as he oh-so-tried to do. you need to spend a day over at www.damnyouautocorrect.com and understand that people aren't all sitting at their desks. And no, that wasn't me, and yes I'm on my laptop. But that doesn't lessen the fact that you're a dick.

    21. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My father is blind. His mailbox is across the street from his house. He needs to cross the street to get his mail. He would never hear an electric car coming down the street if it didn't make a sound that could be identified as a car.

    22. Re:any sound in the world.... by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      Personally, I love the sound of my V8 revving up. But I also hate how much it costs to do that :)

      I foresee a market it downloadable "engine-tunes". Make your car sound like a V8, an I4, or even a Harley.

      Personally, I'd still go for "silent", but I DID get a kick out of the roar of the engine in the Taurus that RoboCop drove.

    23. Re:any sound in the world.... by tlhIngan · · Score: 0

      If you can't be bothered to look both ways before crossing the street, it's you who are negligent. The only exception is the blind, and we have audible crosswalks now, so this technology is pointless.

      So why fight all those texting/cellphone use-while-driving laws? I mean, the VAST majority of people blindly crossing the street are probably on their cellphones.

      Perhaps we should ban all cellphone use while mobile. People can't drive and talk/text (if you think you can - you can't, and you're plainly obvious to everyone who's behind you by your erratic driving), and we know they certainly can't walk and talk/text. I think a lot of police departments are now tracking incidents like this.

      And nevermind the idiotic redlight runners - at least you can hear a revving engine half a block away and look to see if someone will run the red. Or green if someone intends to cut off the pedestrians just starting to cross the street by turning ahead of them.

      Anyhow, having a quiet car does nothing when the car next to you at the light has their bass thumping out playing today's crappy rap/hip-hop song.

    24. Re:any sound in the world.... by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Well, the simple way it to get an electric car now, that does not have the noise. They rarely make people retrofit this kind of crap into older cars or cars made before the law went into effect.

      Personally, if enough people get run over by silent electric cars they will eventually learn to actually LOOK before stepping in to the streets. If not, oh well. Darwinism at it's finest.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    25. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they chose car noise. How uninspiring.

      Personally, I love the sound of my V8 revving up. But I also hate how much it costs to do that :)

      I have a V4 Golf TDI, and while it sounds like an overpowered lawnmower on the outside, on the inside it sound quite wonderful.

    26. Re:any sound in the world.... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Yes because it makes perfect sense to add engine sounds for deaf people...

    27. Re:any sound in the world.... by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      Promptly followed by a civil suit.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    28. Re:any sound in the world.... by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good for the blind, but what about the deaf? I think all cars should be required to make loud noises, and have gigantic strobe lights running all the time.

    29. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a raptor or ty rex would be much better

    30. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer high-winding 4 cylinders (e.g., in WRC) but, considering others have pointed out there's no need for it to be a car noise, I want my car to play "Banana Phone" ad nauseum. Emphasis on nauseum.

    31. Re:any sound in the world.... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      If you can't be bothered to look both ways before crossing the street, it's you who are negligent. The only exception is the blind, and we have audible crosswalks now, so this technology is pointless.

      So why fight all those texting/cellphone use-while-driving laws? I mean, the VAST majority of people blindly crossing the street are probably on their cellphones.

      Uh... not the same thing? I would say equally as dangerous, but no, when you're piloting several tons of metal, glass, and plastic in a state of ACIS*, you're a hell of a lot more dangerous than some meatbag doing the same.

      Perhaps we should ban all cellphone use while mobile. People can't drive and talk/text (if you think you can - you can't, and you're plainly obvious to everyone who's behind you by your erratic driving), and we know they certainly can't walk and talk/text. I think a lot of police departments are now tracking incidents like this.

      Personally, I don't understand where the idea we need all sorts of new laws to cover this stuff comes from; we already have laws against negligence, careless and imprudent driving, jaywalking, etc. etc.

      Essentially, if we (society) aren't willing to enforce existing laws across the board, what makes us (society) think new laws will be treated any differently?

      And nevermind the idiotic redlight runners - at least you can hear a revving engine half a block away and look to see if someone will run the red. Or green if someone intends to cut off the pedestrians just starting to cross the street by turning ahead of them.

      Don't know about your locale, but where I live we always just assume at least 3-5 people are going to run the red light... because they do.

      Consistently.

      Anyhow, having a quiet car does nothing when the car next to you at the light has their bass thumping out playing today's crappy rap/hip-hop song.

      Touche, friend, although with the caveat that we both know that won't always be the case.


      *ACIS: Anal Cranial Inversion Syndrome. Thanks to a childhood friend for coining the term 20 years ago.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    32. Re:any sound in the world.... by danomac · · Score: 2

      You don't need to add an engine noise to the car. Use tires that generate a little more noise, most noise is made by the tires anyway, unless you got the pedal to the metal. When I'm walking around town I always hear the tire noise before the engine (if I hear the engine at all.) Unless it's a pimply-faced kid with a Honda and a fart-can muffler.

    33. Re:any sound in the world.... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If you can't be bothered to look both ways before crossing the street, it's you who are negligent.

      As with any legal matter, who would be considered negligent would be on a per-incident basis, and is a matter for the courts to decide. Personally, I like to err on the side of caution, as being hit by a car FUCKING HURTS, regardless of whose fault it is.

      The only exception is the blind, and we have audible crosswalks now, so this technology is pointless.

      Helen Keller. 'Nuff said?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    34. Re:any sound in the world.... by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      If you are using a device that needs autocorrect so you can type fast enough, read what you wrote. That also applies to using keyboards, but typos are usually detected by the spell checker.

    35. Re:any sound in the world.... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      nothing like blaming the victims for your own self-important attitude. Fortunately, there are adults to keep you in your place.

    36. Re:any sound in the world.... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      oops.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    37. Re:any sound in the world.... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The only exception is the blind, and we have audible crosswalks now, so this technology is pointless.

      Helen Keller. 'Nuff said?

      No, actually. Please elaborate.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    38. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I doubt you would be prosecuted for having "too quiet" a vehicle... that is, until you hit someone with it because they couldn't hear you coming.

      As absurd as it is, silent cars are already illegal in the US. The Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act was signed into law in January 2011. The Department of Transportation has yet to issue detailed regulations, so it may not be enforceable yet, but it will be soon.

    39. Re:any sound in the world.... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Why would you get stopped for having a broken door lock?

    40. Re:any sound in the world.... by Roobles · · Score: 1

      This is an Audi sports car. This isn't a Caravan or a Taurus or a Prius. The kind of people this is marketed to are those that love fast cars, and more often than not racing. And Audi is very, very much in touch with that kind of audience (take a look at the last few years of Le Mans Winners for reference.)

      A large part of the thrill and love for performance vehicles is the sound they make, so rich enthusiasts (the kind that would actually buy something like this) would be very disappointed if this car didn't sound like a car. Take a look at the video. They spent three years engineering the sound, and they need that kind of effort and detail to the sound if they want to be competitive in their target market.

      I'm sorry, but you're not going to be able to slap on a couple mp3's of synthesized rocket ship sounds and expect to sell a high end performance vehicle.

    41. Re:any sound in the world.... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      My father is blind. His mailbox is across the street from his house. He needs to cross the street to get his mail. He would never hear an electric car coming down the street if it didn't make a sound that could be identified as a car.

      trolling or not? he gets braille mail? why not just ask whoever reads the stuff to him to bring it over? I suppose though that he needs to get around more than just to the mailbox.

      actually, what the cars need to do is to drive constantly at speeds over 50 mph, then the tire noise is greater anyways than engine. none of the all electrics I ever sat in were totally silent anyways, they make a noise, prius make a noise too. if they're moving 20mph+ it's pretty hard to tell if a car is idling too - especially if any cars are driving over 40mph anywhere near.

      however, for the driver it helps if there's a sound. the sound should of course be different depending just not on speed but throttle(applied power) too, it's just a haptics like thing. just try playing forza without sound vs. with sound.

      by the way this never seemed a problem for russia where they have a ton of electric busses! (they got electric rails hanging over the streets where they drive). wicked things.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    42. Re:any sound in the world.... by nghate · · Score: 1

      Can I add this to my non-electric car and pump up the volume?
      maybe while I am at it, can I get the sound track to match a really expensive sports car?

      My "Geo Metro" is better than your car cos it is louder !!! ;-)

    43. Re:any sound in the world.... by icebike · · Score: 1

      You don't need to add an engine noise to the car. Use tires that generate a little more noise, most noise is made by the tires anyway, unless you got the pedal to the metal. When I'm walking around town I always hear the tire noise before the engine (if I hear the engine at all.) Unless it's a pimply-faced kid with a Honda and a fart-can muffler.

      Exactly.

      Most modern cars are so quiet, especially at parking lot speeds that they are indistinguishable from electric vehicles.
      When they put noise makers on electric vehicles, the blind or the foolish will simply be hit by regular cars because they will
      be listening for the loud ones.

      If everything gets quieter, and we stop imposing a huge noise burden on society it will be easy to hear the tires.
      Deliberately going the opposite way is silly. We can teach a three year old to look both ways before crossing a street. Why can't we teach an adult?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    44. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. When I rev my electric car engine, I want people to think the WORLD is coming to an END!! VRROOOMM VRRROOOM^H^H^H^H^H er ZZZAP ZZZZAAAAPPP!!

    45. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are an even bigger dick?

    46. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can circumvent this law (when it is passed) by working for law enforcement or the military. They will be allowed to use stealth vehicles.

    47. Re:any sound in the world.... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Actually, in some places (Canada) they are already ticketing people who cross the road while talking on a cell phone, not to mention j-walking is ALREADY illegal. Look both ways before crossing, and use a crosswalk when-ever possile!

    48. Re:any sound in the world.... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      She was deaf AND blind.

    49. Re:any sound in the world.... by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Audible crosswalks are being removed around here. They make too much noise. Besides, they're only installed on really busy intersections where there are stoplights. So, no help for blind pedestrians in suburban areas.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    50. Re:any sound in the world.... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      And adding noise to cars/crosswalks will help a deaf and blind person how?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    51. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      V8? Downsizing are you? real tractors run a V12 6.5 liter 800 BHP monster... Lamborghini :)

    52. Re:any sound in the world.... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain that was the point...

    53. Re:any sound in the world.... by vettemph · · Score: 1

      other options:

      "Watch the family car please! Wa-Watch the family car please!"

      and

      Doot doot da doodley doot
      Doot doot da doo doot
      Doot doot da doodley doot
      DOT DOOT DA DEE DOOT!
      (...that fucking ice cream truck)

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    54. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This already exists...

      You can get loudspeakers that signal off the car's ignition system to gauge RPM and make fake noises.
      They also have fake blow-off valve sounds so you can pretend you have a turbo.

      So all those companies that started making this ricer stuff 5-10 years ago for the import scene are about to make bank on some new government regulations...nice.

    55. Re:any sound in the world.... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      The deaf only rarely care what something sounds like...

      *clap*
      ...
      *clap*
      ...
      *clap*

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    56. Re:any sound in the world.... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      My father is blind. His mailbox is across the street from his house. He needs to cross the street to get his mail.

      That's what crosswalks are for.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    57. Re:any sound in the world.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I really hate the sound of a V8. They sound unbalanced and shitty, much like a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. You want to hear a REAL engine, go listen to a V12.

    58. Re:any sound in the world.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This kinda reminds me of all the fake cellphones people had 15 years ago. They'd carry them around in their cars and talk to themselves on them, so that other people would think they had a real cellphone.

    59. Re:any sound in the world.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that over-the-road tractors typically have inline 6-cylinder diesel engines. Of course, the cylinders are probably bigger than coffee cans, but 6 is sufficient, while all the dumb rednecks with their crappy diesel pickups have V8s. 8 is a crappy number of cylinders to have in an engine, because it's naturally unbalanced. Multiples of 6 are optimal.

    60. Re:any sound in the world.... by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      The cars can honk when they see someone about to cross. Or slow down. It's not like they'd be going 70 in the middle of a city/town/village/wharever.

    61. Re:any sound in the world.... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2

      My father is blind. His mailbox is across the street from his house. He needs to cross the street to get his mail. He would never hear an electric car coming down the street if it didn't make a sound that could be identified as a car.

      Fortunately evs still have tires, which are what make most of the noise in most any car at residential street or parking lot speeds.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    62. Re:any sound in the world.... by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that over-the-road tractors typically have inline 6-cylinder diesel engines

      So do massive container ships. The standard inline-6 design is inherently balanced. Want more power? Just make it bigger.

      V8's are good purely for packaging reasons. The same length as an inline 4 and twice the power? Yes please...plus we dumb rednecks have had V8's for so long that the designs have been optimized quite well...and if you want a diesel pickup you should really get the Cummins.

    63. Re:any sound in the world.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't sound like a car, do you know to jump out of the way?

      I dunno about you, but if I hear something coming at me, I jump out of the way first and confirm its identity second.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    64. Re:any sound in the world.... by HybridST · · Score: 1

      Throw in some crazy subwoofers and the deaf-blind can FEEL the traffic flowing by. Oblig: this could be awesome for ninja-pirates, or even pirate-ninjas too!

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    65. Re:any sound in the world.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      V8's are good purely for packaging reasons.

      Yes, this makes sense in something like the Corvette, where you don't want the engine to be too long, and you also want it to be fairly short (hence the OHV design) to fit under the low hood.

      However, in a pickup, these shouldn't be problems. There's plenty of room under the hood of those things, and there's nothing stopping you from making the hood longer. In fact, many Ford pickups used to have 5.0L I6 engines (which were bigger and made more torque than the 4.9L V8 option).

    66. Re:any sound in the world.... by HybridST · · Score: 1

      As someone who walks 20 to 40 km a week tires are noisy things *unless* you have in-ear headphones or earbuds. I don't use headphones while walking but the vast majority of people have no clue about the damage headphones cause to hearing and as a musician that risk is unacceptable.
      I can tell you that "earbuds" of any colour plugged into any music or media-playing device drown out most cars until about 40kph or a hill/acceleration even at a low media-level. Parking lots are deadly places when you don't have steel/fibreglass walls and an airbag system around you even at the best of times.

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    67. Re:any sound in the world.... by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Only true for very small values of V. (they're an inline 4).

    68. Re:any sound in the world.... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      Another example how stupid 'intelligent' people are.

      If you suppose nothing is coming from left or right you likely don't look left or right, or?

      If you can't be bothered to look both ways before crossing the street

      If I hear there is absolutely nothing on the street, I don't look, why should I? And how exactly do I train my body over night to behave different?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    69. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The blind have right-of-way in all cases. When you are old enough to drive, you'll learn that.

    70. Re:any sound in the world.... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Basically not only having driven vehicles but also having been a pedestrian and a cyclists, I listen for tire noise not engine noise. At car-parking speeds vehicles turning generate a lot of tyre noise from the front wheels.

      When it comes to driving I off course only listen out for sirens or horns and rely upon vision.

      Driving an electric vehicle I would not want to waste any electricity on pointless sound generating devices. Things I would prefer would be solar panels on every horizontal surface for that extra free energy boost rather than wasting energy.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    71. Re:any sound in the world.... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      A heard of stampeding elephants would be more original.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    72. Re:any sound in the world.... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      How is that negligent? If some twat wants to jump in front of my car they should have to pay for the damage they do.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    73. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already exists, although only if you want a V8 or V12 (the V12 sounds like arse though)

      http://www.latestbuy.com.au/sound-racer-fm-transmitter.html

    74. Re:any sound in the world.... by Lotana · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia Helen Keller was both deaf and blind.

      In practical terms, it is impossible to design our roadways to work with such pedestrians in mind. A current, loud vehicle design is just as dangerous as a silent one to these people.

    75. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know if you can hack it to play anything you want... "Ah, ha, ha, ha, stayin' alive, stayin' alive... Ah, ha, ha, ha, stayin' alive!"

    76. Re:any sound in the world.... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Really, if you hear a puppy walking up, you jump out of the way? Every time you hear someone carrying a radio playing classical music .... etc.

      There are lots of sounds that don't make us jump.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    77. Re:any sound in the world.... by Leuf · · Score: 1

      Longer hoods? Like they need an excuse to make the beds even shorter. I keep waiting to see the next generation of trucks with 3 rows of seats and a wheelbarrow strapped to the back.

    78. Re:any sound in the world.... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      or at least replace it with the Jettson's care noise.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    79. Re:any sound in the world.... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe I could get a whole movie themed sound, so every time I accelerate the tires squeal.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    80. Re:any sound in the world.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the Kenworth Pilgrimage or Grand Dominator.

    81. Re:any sound in the world.... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Well, at least it's better than the melodies played by iceream vans.

    82. Re:any sound in the world.... by LongearedBat · · Score: 2

      Great. Now I've got this mental imagery of cars hiding behind corners and lamp posts, then tiptoeing up to people from behind.

    83. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like over 50% of the cabs in Vancouver are Toyota Prius and they sneak up on you all day long as a pedestrian.

      I live in Berkeley, and I can assure you there are a lot of Priuses here. The claim that they are silent is bullshit. They are (thankfully) much quieter, but they still make some noise. If you can't hear it, then you have crappy hearing. Why should all of society have to pay the price for your lack of attention to your surroundings? Deaf people can manage to avoid being hit by cars, so so can you.

    84. Re:any sound in the world.... by jnork · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, this came up in a conversation I had earlier this week.

      Why not pick... music? Birds singing? A waterfall?

      Because the cue your mind is expecting is a car engine. Your subconscious is expecting a car to sound like a car, not like something else; if it hears something else, you might not realize that danger is approaching until it's too late. Or never. It's more important for pedestrians or other cars than inside the cab, and most important for the visually impaired.

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    85. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why fight all those texting/cellphone use-while-driving laws? I mean, the VAST majority of people blindly crossing the street are probably on their cellphones.

      You're making two contrary points there. For the first, if you're distracted while driving, you're a fecking idiot and a menace to everyone around you. For the second, if you're ignoring the world around you when you're crossing the street, don't get all whiney if you get struck by a vehicle; that's just natural selection at work. There's a reason it's called "terminal stupidity".

    86. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I can't turn it off I want an option for the sound of a hockey card in bicycle spokes. Or the Lone Ranger's theme song. (Let's see people show their age by getting that reference.)

    87. Re:any sound in the world.... by hawkinspeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't you have cyclists in your part of the world?

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    88. Re:any sound in the world.... by Xarius · · Score: 2

      I discovered a while ago that most crossings in the UK have a little metal nubbin underneath the button...When it's safe to walk the metal thingy whirs around, and it stays still when it's not safe!

      Genius.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    89. Re:any sound in the world.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Cars haven't had horizontal surfaces since the 1800s. Now they have curved surfaces (ALL of them, even the ones that look flat) which are harder to put a solar panel on. A curved ("crowned") area has rigidity while a flat area doesn't and it flexes, therefore it stretches, which leads to oilcanning.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    90. Re:any sound in the world.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You want to hear a REAL engine, go listen to a V12.

      I prefer the sound of my I5. A V12 sounds too much like an instrument. An I5 sounds like a machine - and it's still balanced and smooth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    91. Re:any sound in the world.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that over-the-road tractors typically have inline 6-cylinder diesel engines. Of course, the cylinders are probably bigger than coffee cans, but 6 is sufficient, while all the dumb rednecks with their crappy diesel pickups have V8s.

      Unless it says "Dodge" on it, in which case it's got a Cummins, which is an inline six.

      V8s aren't bad. They're a lot smoother than V6s and they make the best torque for the number of cylinders. They're not as smooth as an inline six but inline sixes have a floppy crank problem you don't have on fives, which is what you REALLY want. Odd that so few have been made, comparatively.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    92. Re:any sound in the world.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      A lot of ICE vehicles are going to need a noise upgrade when that comes into effect.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    93. Re:any sound in the world.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Any vehicle with an automatic diff locker does that if you accelerate from a stop while turning.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    94. Re:any sound in the world.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Some people just don't like a choppy engine noise. I bet you don't like boxer-4s either. I don't mind boxers or V8s them but I don't like Harleys. Something sounds seriously wrong with them - which there is, the engines are intentionally designed badly to make that noise. This is a really great noise IMO:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aUl_3KWYjQ

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    95. Re:any sound in the world.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Plus long engines are just bad for balance. You want as little weight hanging over the front axle as possible - except for FWD cars where you need some for front traction. A long hood is a waste of space.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    96. Re:any sound in the world.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Lots of good samples to be had from Wave Twisters

      "Say A-ah-ah-ah-ah-ah-ah-ah-AAAAHHH"

      "Blast-blast-blast those fools!"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    97. Re:any sound in the world.... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You don't need to add an engine noise to the car. Use tires that generate a little more noise, most noise is made by the tires anyway, unless you got the pedal to the metal.

      That noise tires make is the sound of them wearing; the noisier the tire, the faster it wears out. Take, for example, Jeeps travelling down the highway with off-road tires equipped - you hear them coming a mile away, but chances are they're going to be buying $200-a-pop tires at least twice as often as someone with the proper equipment would.

      Not that I don't like the idea, but I would rather spend a pittance of electrical power on a speaker than have to buy more tires.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    98. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Audi vehicles, many "U.S. required" "safety" features can be enabled/disabled or chnaged by connecting a VAG-COM to the OBD port, and using the software that comes with it. Ross-Tech makes the real thing, and there are asian knockoffs that supposedly work. I bought the real thing, and despite it being ~$350, have never thought it a waste of cash. With third party software, (motronic) you can usually even adjust mixture and timing. You can't re-plot fuel curves, but if you know that you are running higher octane fuel, or using high methanol content fuels, you can adjust timing or fueling at idle, or across the board.

    99. Re:any sound in the world.... by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Why would you get stopped for having a broken door lock?

      Because they notice you trying to hold the door closed with one hand and failing?

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    100. Re:any sound in the world.... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      We have audible crosswalks now? Where? At like 5 intersections in my city.

    101. Re:any sound in the world.... by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      I'll have to go looking for the sound of a ramjet. However, I hear the sound of pulsejets, V1 "buzzbombs," was both interesting and dreaded.

      I couldn't believe my eyes when I first started reading the comments for this article. Some people on Slashdot were actually OK with being told they had to have a noisemaker on their car.

      My car will be so fast that no one will be able to hear it before it arrives, and then the sound will be very loud.

    102. Re:any sound in the world.... by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Yes! Except your observation is based on most V8s, which have "cross-plane" or "90 degree" crankshafts. Those with "flat" or "180 degree" cranks sound great, as they are even-firing. I'm only aware of a few flat-crank V8 designs, specifically those from Lotus and Ferrari. Flat crank designs have second-order vibrations (not unlike inline 4s), but that isn't so important in 1) sports cars, and 2) engines under 4 litres.

      I don't like the "V8 burble" so popular with (Chevelle, for example) fans and hate the sound of a V-twin. Incidentally, cross-plane V8s sound a lot better when there's a "balance pipe" connecting the left and right exhausts before they exit. It can add a little power, too, if designed properly.

      V12, yes, the engine of serious luxury and some of the most interesting sports cars (XKE Series 3, XJ13, McLaren F1, old Packards... and the Rolls-Royce Merlin powering WWII Spitfires and Mustangs!

    103. Re:any sound in the world.... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      How is that negligent? If some twat wants to jump in front of my car they should have to pay for the damage they do.

      If you are intentionally disabling safety systems, you are actively endangering the lives of others (according to the law). If someone else gets injured because of said act of disabling safety systems, you will be charged with criminal negligence. Conviction would be based on evidence.

      Just like driving at night without headlights. Take some responsibility for yourself.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    104. Re:any sound in the world.... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Of the several thousand intersections in my city, I can think of all of 3 that have audible signals.

      And those are concentrated around the colleges.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    105. Re:any sound in the world.... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      At the very least he probably belongs to his state's talking book library. They send tapes (and now flash cartridges) through the mail since blind people have more difficulty getting to the library than most. Braille is much more expensive but some states send that too.

    106. Re:any sound in the world.... by dullertap · · Score: 0

      Deaf people can still 'feel' noise. Go to a concert sometime.

    107. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be negligent, but you are an asshole. You run over my cat with your silent car, then we'll see some darwinism, fucktard.

    108. Re:any sound in the world.... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      What about hearing Justin Bieber come by you everytime a pube drives his car past your block?

      Too late...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    109. Re:any sound in the world.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Really, if you hear a puppy walking up, you jump out of the way?

      Yes, if I hear an animal heading straight at me I either dodge or at the very least look what's going on, depending on how far it is.

      Every time you hear someone carrying a radio playing classical music .... etc.

      If I hear "Ride of the Valkyries" heading straight at me, yes, I'll dodge :).

      There are lots of sounds that don't make us jump.

      This isn't about jumping at sounds, this is about something being at a collision course with you. Why the heck wouldn't you dodge, or at least ensure it's nothing dangerous? And why would a car need to make extra noise just to accomodate your laziness/overconfidence/suicidal tendencies/whatever?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    110. Re:any sound in the world.... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You can hear cyclist very well, so what is your point?

      And if you get run over by a bicycle well, it hurts. If you get run over by an electric car you are likely dead.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    111. Re:any sound in the world.... by davesag · · Score: 1

      but just wait, as this idea takes off, engine sounds will be the new ring-tones. Sure it's stupid; but so are most ring-tones.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    112. Re:any sound in the world.... by danomac · · Score: 1

      You're also forgetting that tires that make more noise are generally more "sticky" and have better traction.

      I've always opted for the "stickier" tires. They do wear out, but the difference in traction/control in non-dry road situations is quite noticable.

      To me safety>replacing tires more often.

    113. Re:any sound in the world.... by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Cyclists make very little noise - I'm surprised that you can hear cyclists, but not hear electric cars. The point is that you should look before crossing a road.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    114. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't be bothered to look both ways before crossing the street, it's you who are negligent. The only exception is the blind, and we have audible crosswalks now, so this technology is pointless.

      You obviously don't you use your feet to get around, asshole. Even if I look both ways it's not uncommon for some douche to blast around a corner. If I don't hear them, I don't jump out of the way.
      This technology would be pointless if people were good drivers, but you specifically are a terrible driver and ergo we desperately need this technology.

    115. Re:any sound in the world.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because noise is now a safety device? Last I checked it was illegal to have a noisy vehicle.

    116. Re:any sound in the world.... by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      At speed they make about the same WHOOSH noise, however from a stand still pulling out or at slow speeds approaching a turning lane about the only sound you hear the tires on the road surface, which is next to nothing on clean pavement. Down town with construction noise or traffic, you simply do not hear them compared to a quite campus parking lot..

      Yes, as a pedestrian you have the right of way, and YES you should always look both ways, but that doesn't mean they are VERY hard to notice over other traffic downtown.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
  3. Noise needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was just thinking, of all the things we need more in modern society, what would it be? The answer: NOISE!! Oh yeah. Its just too quiet in our cities.

  4. To hell with noise pollution by doston · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in downtown Seattle and sometimes the noise is a bit much. The worst are the hogs that are designed to be incredibly noisy. People need to WATCH where they're going (look both ways, morons) and LOOK at the speedometer. And no, I'm not moving to some suburb or the country. It's not a living nightmare or anything, but I hardly see any good reason, other than just supporting stupidity, to actually put work into creating noise.

    1. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about blind people?

    2. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Denogh · · Score: 1

      I live in downtown Seattle and sometimes the noise is a bit much. The worst are the hogs that are designed to be incredibly noisy. People need to WATCH where they're going (look both ways, morons) and LOOK at the speedometer. And no, I'm not moving to some suburb or the country. It's not a living nightmare or anything, but I hardly see any good reason, other than just supporting stupidity, to actually put work into creating noise.

      The issue I've heard associated with this was the blind. You know, those folks who can't look both ways.

    3. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person responsible for the car is the driver.

      Hopefully the driver is not blind.

    4. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about blind people?

      The blind peoples will heard the not so silent electric car. Only someone not paying attention (eg; non-blind and distracted idiots) wouldn't notice. Peoples just need to get use to the new sound. Adding motor sound, or custom hover car sound, are fine during transition.

    5. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in downtown Seattle and sometimes the noise is a bit much. The worst are the hogs that are designed to be incredibly noisy. People need to WATCH where they're going (look both ways, morons) and LOOK at the speedometer. And no, I'm not moving to some suburb or the country. It's not a living nightmare or anything, but I hardly see any good reason, other than just supporting stupidity, to actually put work into creating noise.

      The issue I've heard associated with this was the blind. You know, those folks who can't look both ways.

      The blind peoples will heard the not so silent electric car. Only someone not paying attention (eg; non-blind and distracted idiots) wouldn't notice. Peoples just need to get use to the new sound. Adding motor sound, or custom hover car sound, are fine during transition.

    6. Re:To hell with noise pollution by doston · · Score: 2

      I live in downtown Seattle and sometimes the noise is a bit much. The worst are the hogs that are designed to be incredibly noisy. People need to WATCH where they're going (look both ways, morons) and LOOK at the speedometer. And no, I'm not moving to some suburb or the country. It's not a living nightmare or anything, but I hardly see any good reason, other than just supporting stupidity, to actually put work into creating noise.

      The issue I've heard associated with this was the blind. You know, those folks who can't look both ways.

      I'm surprised they don't get hit by more bikes then. Maybe the driver should look. Come to think of it, this whole article is stupid anyway. They're already simulating sound...I mean, maybe not with a literal synthesizer, but my G35 would apparently be almost silent, but for the crap they've done with the exhaust. So, not sure this is entirely a new thing. I know, maybe they could implant things in blind people's ears that alert them of an oncoming silent car...like a super loud and startling BEEP?

    7. Re:To hell with noise pollution by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two words: blind people.

      Or more elaborately, everyone who can hear uses auditory cues to navigate in addition to other cues. Electric cars are highly unusual in that they make much less noise than their internal combustion engine counterparts. Until silent electric cars are commonplace enough that the public is aware that the normal sensitivity of audition may be insufficient to navigate as a pedestrian, adding sound would seem to be a good idea on the whole. Of course, the flip side is that people who are spending their time buried in their hand-held devices and don't look up when crossing the road are more likely to be weeded from the gene pool by silent cars, and some might consider that a plus. Getting to the point above, though, there are many people -- millions in the US alone -- with low vision or blindnes for whom automobile sounds are critical in warning of impending danger. Adding a modest sound to quiet electric cars definitely seems a good idea for them.

      But if you really want to cut down on urban noise pollution, as your post implies, address trucks, buses, and construction crews. Non-electric cars just aren't that loud and motorcycles aren't that frequent. Try to talk on a mobile phone as a truck or bus drives past, though: it's impossible.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    8. Re:To hell with noise pollution by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I know, maybe they could implant things in blind people's ears that alert them of an oncoming silent car...like a super loud and startling BEEP?

      Yea, that's waaaay more reasonable than attaching a loudspeaker to the car...

      As if being blind wasn't bad enough...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:To hell with noise pollution by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      At least downtown Seattle only has to deal with engine noise; unlike NY where there's also all of the dimwits honking CONSTANTLY as if it will get them to their destination faster.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    10. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next you'll be complaining that the cloaking device on my car should emit some sort of pulsing light so that deaf people can still see my car. Sheesh. That kind of defeats the purpose of having an invisible car.

    11. Re:To hell with noise pollution by doston · · Score: 2

      At least downtown Seattle only has to deal with engine noise; unlike NY where there's also all of the dimwits honking CONSTANTLY as if it will get them to their destination faster.

      --Jeremy

      It's true that there is very rarely honking here. It's actually illegal, but more importantly, socially unacceptable. Even if you're totally right, you'll be looked at by bystanders like you're Hitler for touching that horn.

    12. Re:To hell with noise pollution by doston · · Score: 1

      I know, maybe they could implant things in blind people's ears that alert them of an oncoming silent car...like a super loud and startling BEEP?

      Yea, that's waaaay more reasonable than attaching a loudspeaker to the car... As if being blind wasn't bad enough...

      You can't count on sound, either. Would you literally trust your life to hearing a car coming? Hear both ways! I don't think so. How about instead of an inhumane implant, we go with either a removable shock collar (with id tag) or headphones with the voice of a beautiful woman, like Siri.

    13. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. However, the driver should not be held responsible if some jackass who is not paying attention steps out in front of the car. The entire 'pedestrians always has the right of way' is completely asinine. It boggles the mind.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    14. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Two words: blind people.

      100% bullshit.

      You don't hear a car approaching because of the engine, you hear the tires on the road more than anything. Modern cars make VERY little noise from the engine, and what little they do produce is directed BEHIND it.

      This isn't an issue that blind people are worried about. This is an issue that politicians are trying to use to gain personal publicity by pretending THEY care about blind people...ironically more than blind people care about themselves.

      In reality, bicycles are a far greater danger to blind people because they make much less noise than even an electric car, while simultaneously having no interest in obeying any traffic laws.

    15. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: the curb.

    16. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Chelloveck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Until silent electric cars are commonplace enough that the public is aware that the normal sensitivity of audition may be insufficient to navigate as a pedestrian, adding sound would seem to be a good idea on the whole.

      No, it wouldn't seem that way. Why? Because if you add artificial noise people will never become aware of it. It just perpetuates the problem.

      Adding noise is exactly the wrong answer. Quiet cars are a nice step forward for those of us who can hear. How about instead we come up with some protocol for a blind person to signal his intent to cross the street? Say, hold out your arm and point to the other side for 10 seconds before crossing. Then train drivers to actually stop for that signal? That would have other benefits as well. Sighted people could use the same signal, making it easier for them to cross busy streets too. And it would protect the blind from those oh-so-silent bicyclists whizzing down the street. (Or maybe bicyclists should adopt some sort of artificial vroom-vroom noise just like cars?)

      Simple, free, and peaceful. What more could you want?

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    17. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      Until silent electric cars are commonplace enough that the public is aware that the normal sensitivity of audition may be insufficient to navigate as a pedestrian, adding sound would seem to be a good idea on the whole.

      I'm not so sure that people getting used to the idea is the issue so much as the threat of a massive object silently barreling into people. Construction vehicles aren't beeping when backing up until people get used to the idea--that was mandated in 1971 because it was deemed dangerous for them not to.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    18. Re:To hell with noise pollution by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I know, maybe they could implant things in blind people's ears that alert them of an oncoming silent car...like a super loud and startling BEEP?

      Yea, that's waaaay more reasonable than attaching a loudspeaker to the car... As if being blind wasn't bad enough...

      You can't count on sound, either. Would you literally trust your life to hearing a car coming? Hear both ways! I don't think so. How about instead of an inhumane implant, we go with either a removable shock collar (with id tag)

      OK, first off, how is a shock collar less inhumane than your other idea? Christ, what are you, some kind of sadist? Wait... on second thought, don't answer that...

      or headphones with the voice of a beautiful woman, like Siri.

      Uh, dude, you do realize Siri isn't actually a woman, but rather a mathematical algorithm designed to emulate the sound of a female human voice, right? No different from ShitTalker (please tell me I'm not the only one who remembers ShitTalker!)

      Hate to burst your robotophilic bubble...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    19. Re:To hell with noise pollution by mutube · · Score: 1

      And people wearing headphones.

      I frequently walk to work with music in my ears and sometimes (if its a good tune or I need waking up) quite loud. So I make a point of looking both ways - even against the traffic (emergency vehicles) - when approaching crossings and looking again as I step out.

      I've pulled someone back from a pedestrian crossing who stepped out on green into an oncoming police car - blaring sirens/lights skidding around a blind corner. You need to look and keep looking.

      I'm not sure what the solution is for those with poor eyesight. Everyone else (and the environment) suffering noise pollution seems like a poor solution. A higher frequency - and quieter - travelling shorter distances may be a nice compromise. I'll be honest, I was looking forward to not hearing the perpetual background hum.

    20. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire 'pedestrians always has the right of way' is completely asinine. It boggles the mind.

      So true, you don't expect train drivers to be treated the same way.

    21. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst are the hogs that are designed to be incredibly noisy.

      I knew they'd been bred to have less fat. Didn't realize noise was a big issue on pig farms.

    22. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric cars are highly unusual in that they make much less noise than their internal combustion engine counterparts. Until silent electric cars are commonplace enough that the public is aware that the normal sensitivity of audition may be insufficient to navigate as a pedestrian

      I'm sorry, that is a bullshit argument.

      Unless your exhaust is broken, vast *majority* of car noise is from the tires not the engine. And for slow speeds (30km/h), most modern cars you can't even hear a difference between stationary and moving. Furthermore, for slow speeds, you can stop on a dime.

      So WTF for do we need car engine noise???

    23. Re:To hell with noise pollution by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Isn't most of the noise from a properly maintained modern car from the tires anyway? I think this calls for some testing.

    24. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the hogs are designed to be quiet. Some owners take liberties with the original engineering. If they couldn't, they'd probably figure out some way to clip playing cards to the fork legs so they'd click against the spokes.

    25. Re:To hell with noise pollution by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

      (Or maybe bicyclists should adopt some sort of artificial vroom-vroom noise just like cars?)

      You mean, something like a bell? Yeah, that'd be novel.

    26. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? That's your solution for blind people? "Just trust us?"

    27. Re:To hell with noise pollution by doston · · Score: 1
      Hate to burst your robotophilic bubble...

      Siri: I came here from a faraway planet. A planet ruled by a chauvinistic Manputer that was really a Manbot. Have you any idea how it feels to be a Fembot living in a Manbot's Manputer's world? http://www.comedycentral.com/video-clips/btnncx/futurama-fembot

    28. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, almost all modern vehicles (other than those designed to make noise) are just as quiet as hybrids, and nearly as silent as electrics, when going at slow speeds in parking lots. The vision-impaired are already trained to take special care, and sentient drivers already know that parking lots are not streets. Bringing up the vision-impaired is a canard.

      The people being protected by these foolish noisemakers are the earbud-addicted, the permanently-addled-and-distracted, and the cellphone-addicted who have no notion of their surroundings.

      Natural selection, anyone?

    29. Re:To hell with noise pollution by bws111 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure trains are the best comparison to use here. Trains do not exactly sneak up on you. Grade crossings often have gates that block the road, flashing lights, and a bell. In addition, the train has a bright always-on headlight, and an extremely loud horn that can be heard for at least a mile and is sounded well ahead of the train entering the crossing. Not to mention that the train itself is incredibly loud.

    30. Re:To hell with noise pollution by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they don't get hit by more bikes then.

      I'm not. I'm not blind, but I'm generally aware of what's happening around me, and can easily hear bikes coming. Are people just generally deaf, or what is the problem?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    31. Re:To hell with noise pollution by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Say, hold out your arm and point to the other side for 10 seconds before crossing. Then train drivers to actually stop for that signal?

      OK, not a bad idea. Couple problems, but it could work.

      Sighted people could use the same signal

      And here is where it falls apart. People will start ignoring the signal again as soon as those who don't need to use it start to use it anyway.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    32. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to talk on a mobile phone as a truck or bus drives past, though: it's impossible.

      Never been a problem. Perhaps you need a better phone.

    33. Re:To hell with noise pollution by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

      train drivers

      hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

      We have not managed to train drivers to not hit other cars, and you want to train them to pay attention to people on the side of the road?

      The solution is to ban cars from urban areas.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    34. Re:To hell with noise pollution by doston · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they don't get hit by more bikes then.

      I'm not. I'm not blind, but I'm generally aware of what's happening around me, and can easily hear bikes coming. Are people just generally deaf, or what is the problem?

      I don't know, but if you can hear a bicycle, you could hear one of these things coming. They must be louder than a bike. And aren't the blind supposed to have better hearing? See, they're just being argumentative bringing up the fringe, special interest group of the blind. :)

    35. Re:To hell with noise pollution by tokul · · Score: 1

      Then train drivers to actually stop for that signal?

      Similar training is already included in traffic rules. Drivers are supposed to stop when pedestrian crosses the road in crossroads and other designated places. It does not stop drivers from not stopping and trying to outrun pedestrian. Cars are more dangerous to pedestrians than pedestrians to cars. That's why cars should warn about their approach and not pedestrians.

    36. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire 'pedestrians always has the right of way' is completely asinine. It boggles the mind.

      It's not at all asinine, but perhaps you don't understand that it's qualified. If a pedestrian enters a crosswalk with a red light or don't walk signal, they do NOT have the right of way. If they enter the street at an arbitrary location in the middle of the block, they do NOT have the right of way.

      But if you, as a driver, are traveling through an intersection that has no signals, but does have a crosswalk, then yes, you should be on the lookout for pedestrians. And if you don't think you can adequately and safely scan the intersection for pedestrians, then maybe you should slow down a bit.

    37. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, bikers are much less numerous than cars and maybe double the weight of a person (if that). A danger? Yes. Far greater of a danger? Come off it.

    38. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time for those little handheld devices to detect and warn of approaching vehicles.

    39. Re:To hell with noise pollution by u38cg · · Score: 1
      We already have this. It's in the Highway Code (in the UK at least). If a blind person holds up their cane, traffic is expected to stop.

      I have to admit I've never seen it used.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    40. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Speaking of music! I live within a couple hundred yards of a major roadway and honestly the traffic noise isn't bad at all. The morons cruising down my street playing music loud enough to shake the window panes is much more of an issue. I really wish we could get better enforcement of noise ordinances where I live.

    41. Re:To hell with noise pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, don't move to Bellevue looking for peace and quiet.

  5. There is a benefit to the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fewer blind people will be killed.

    1. Re:There is a benefit to the noise by rock56501 · · Score: 2

      Noisemakers in all new Hybrid's/EV are required under a law that was passed during the lame-duck congressional session in Dec 2010. Toyota's Prius started putting them in the 2012 models.

  6. Noise Ordinances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every major city has one for speakers. If they are creating a sound, I wonder how that will work with our existing laws.

  7. The sound I'd choose for my car by wickerprints · · Score: 0

    would be the nyan cat jingle

    1. Re:The sound I'd choose for my car by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      2 stroke weed eater

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:The sound I'd choose for my car by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Better yet, just drive a Trabant and get the two-stroke weed eater sound PLUS the huge cloud of blue burned oil smoke. The deaf guy will hear you coming, smell you coming, and then be able to move out of the way because you can only go about 8 mph in one of those cars.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    3. Re:The sound I'd choose for my car by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      Chain saw. That would get their attention.

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    4. Re:The sound I'd choose for my car by Cosgrach · · Score: 0

      Steam locomotive.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    5. Re:The sound I'd choose for my car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it'd have to be the Pacman wakka-wakka-wakka noise :-D

  8. This is wonderful by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally men can spend their entire lives going "Vroom! Vroom!" behind the wheel, instead of being forced to stop at the tender age of 11.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    1. Re:This is wonderful by lexarius · · Score: 1

      I intend to use a recording of someone saying "Vroom! Vroom!" as my car's "engine revving" noise.

  9. My suggestion: by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Jetsons.

    If I ever get to choose my own sound, it will be this.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    1. Re:My suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go with Nyan Nyan myself.

    2. Re:My suggestion: by HybridST · · Score: 1

      Guitar whammy dive sounds fun...

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    3. Re:My suggestion: by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.

      I'd still disable it though; replace the drivers with a resistor array so the amplifiers think the speakers are still connected.

      This is idiotic. If you don't know how fast you're driving you should maybe consider glancing at your speedometer now and then like everyone else does?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  10. Stealth by synapse7 · · Score: 1

    While the idea of adding fake noise to silent operation still seems silly to me, i was caught by surprise by a hybrid in a parking lot. I hate to be that guy, but there was enough other noise I didn't hear it rolling and it spooked me. Should cars be heard for safety reasons?

    1. Re:Stealth by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can just as easily be caught by surprise by a conventional engine car with a newer engine too. Should they also outlaw very good mufflers?

    2. Re:Stealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just making noise isn't enough. You need to have someone walking in front of the car ringing a bell to make sure people hear you coming.

    3. Re:Stealth by GNULinuxGuy · · Score: 1

      It's not just the mufflers either. The engine compartment itself on pretty much any vehicle made in the past decade tends to be pretty well insulated. Many times people have been standing right next to my car (which isn't even new) in a quiet area and didn't realize it was running. Your best bet for hearing any vehicle in recent years is the road noise from the tires. If they're going too slow for that, then your eyes (or those of your guide dog/etc) should be more than sufficient!

      --
      Earn Cash and Prizes, and get free stuff!
    4. Re:Stealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can heal a gasoline engine running even if the muffler is very quiet.

    5. Re:Stealth by mark-t · · Score: 1

      But then you are looking at actually having to take pause and explicitly listen for an engine sound that you are already expecting to be there, which is why you can hear it.

      In practice, with most cars you're going to hear the sound of the tires on the road *LONG* before you hear the engine, unless there is something wrong with its muffler, and at speeds that are too low to hear the tires on the ground, with some manufacturer's cars equipped with a new engine and a good muffler, it can sneak up on you just as easily as an electric car could.

      Both Rolls Royce and Lexus come to mind as especially silent. At low speeds you're just not going to hear its engine unless you are right beside it and listening for it. At higher speeds, again, you'll hear the tires on the road first.

      This law requiring electric cars to make noise may as well prohibit companies from making good mufflers. It should also require noisemakers on bicycles, and motorized wheelchairs, both of which can be almost as hazardous to pedestrians as automobiles.

  11. Onomatopoeia by Cazekiel · · Score: 2

    If I got one of these, I'd just it in the driver's seat with the windows open, screeching "NYYYYYAAA! NE-YEEHHH! REEEEEEEEEEEE-OOOH! RRRRR! RRRR-CK!".

    --
    You want to know how to help your kids? LEAVE THEM THE F*&K ALONE. --George Carlin
  12. Raymond Scott's Powerhouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obvious answer continues to elude the automobile industry's greatest minds: Raymond Scott's Powerhouse. Thousands of electric cars on a highway playing Powerhouse in unison would be orgasmic!

  13. 3 years? seriously? by million_monkeys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who thinks it shouldn't take 3 years to figure out how to make a car produce engine noises? There are plenty of video games out there that manage to pull it off and I doubt any of them spent even 3 months on designing engine noises. Granted they didn't have to work out all the hardware involved, but even that doesn't seem like it should take years.

    1. Re:3 years? seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Card in the spokes. Done!

    2. Re:3 years? seriously? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thinks it shouldn't take 3 years to figure out how to make a car produce engine noises?

      No, no you are not. When I read that, I thought, really? 3 years? Uh, lemme see... loudspeaker + audio source + the tachometer = programmable sound that varies with engine speed. Took me all of 10 seconds.

      Sometimes I think letting engineers have all the fun when it comes to design is part of the problem; they tend to forget Occam's Razor. Then again, with all the drive-by-wire stuff they're mucking about with these days, maybe I shouldn't be surprised the auto engineers forgot that, at it's base, a car is a mechanical device.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:3 years? seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It takes 10 minutes to reproduce a car sound, it takes the remainder of the 3 years to retake that step and find a sound that has not already been copyrighted...

    4. Re:3 years? seriously? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Am I the only one who thinks it shouldn't take 3 years to figure out how to make a car produce engine noises?

      No, no you are not. When I read that, I thought, really? 3 years? Uh, lemme see... loudspeaker + audio source + the tachometer = programmable sound that varies with engine speed. Took me all of 10 seconds.
       

      So what sounds do you play (a normal engine whirr or a deep-throated big-block?)? How do you scale that sound with RPMs? How do you ensure the sound you're playing won't be irritating to everyone after a period of time?

      Even more important - how do you handle interior vs. exterior sounds? Car makers do NOT make the whole cabin soundproof - they actually do funnel some engine sound into the cabin. Do you play an "idling" sound? Do you consider the inside and outside to be separate sounds? Do you simulate gears (and if so, at what points? and do you base it on speed or RPMs or how the driver is pressing down?). And how does it sound in the rain/snow/sand/dirt?

      It's the whole UI thing - that takes far longer to do than the technical steps. Little things like where you put the speaker can have a huge effect - it tane turn a great sound into a muffled annoying rumble. Or the mixing of existing car noise (motor/controller whine, wind noise) may turn the noise into something horrible.

      Hell, there are apps for your phone that play back engine noiess, but the whole acoustic package has to be considered.

      Sometimes I think letting engineers have all the fun when it comes to design is part of the problem; they tend to forget Occam's Razor. Then again, with all the drive-by-wire stuff they're mucking about with these days, maybe I shouldn't be surprised the auto engineers forgot that, at it's base, a car is a mechanical device.

      Drive by wire has several advantages, including reliability, economy (cars are "twist'n'go" these days - the computer does all the necessary adjustments to ensure it can start in the harshest conditions with a simple twist of the key - no accellerator flooring/choke adjusting/etc), emissions, etc. Plus information sharing - the navigation system can do dead reckoning based on wheel motion, speed, the steering wheel position, etc when it loses GPS signal. Nevermind all the safety features that people love, and cruise control.

    5. Re:3 years? seriously? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Uh, lemme see... loudspeaker + audio source + the tachometer = programmable sound that varies with engine speed.

      What are you doing? Designing a system for use with vacuum tubes? The proper way to do this in modern times is to use GPS to determine the speed of the car, synthesize the required sound by simulating an internal combustion engine and then varying the current to the electric motor, so the axle vibrates to create the required sound. Oh, but GPS updates too infrequently, we probably need an optical detector (like in optical mice) to augment it - use the detector for frequent measurements then calibrate it using GPS.

      Now it will be possible to have additional 100MB of software in the car.

    6. Re:3 years? seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's awesome! And yeah, he's high. It's sad that youtube and $15 worth of weed can replace 3 years of audio mixing.

    7. Re:3 years? seriously? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Car makers do NOT make the whole cabin soundproof - they actually do funnel some engine sound into the cabin.

      Not unless they have a good engine. Economy cars are made as quiet as they can be within the cost and weight targets.

      Plus information sharing - the navigation system can do dead reckoning based on wheel motion, speed, the steering wheel position, etc when it loses GPS signal.

      NONE of that requires drive by wire.

      Perhaps you should resist the urge to make declarative statements about cars, which you clearly don't understand.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:3 years? seriously? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Uh, lemme see... loudspeaker + audio source + the tachometer = programmable sound that varies with engine speed.

      What are you doing? Designing a system for use with vacuum tubes? The proper way to do this in modern times is to use GPS to determine the speed of the car, synthesize the required sound by simulating an internal combustion engine and then varying the current to the electric motor, so the axle vibrates to create the required sound. Oh, but GPS updates too infrequently, we probably need an optical detector (like in optical mice) to augment it - use the detector for frequent measurements then calibrate it using GPS.

      Now it will be possible to have additional 100MB of software in the car.

      Crack.
      Me.
      Up.

      I guess that's why the auto engineers make the big bucks designing ass-backward systems, while little ol' me just builds stuff that actually works in my garage, eh mon ami?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:3 years? seriously? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Same for me, though I am probably more backward. I love my 1982 car, and one of the reasons is the lack of software in it. I recently made a dual low frequency counter (to measure the actual mains frequency and rotation speed of one fan) by using discrete logic chips - the data is then read by a PC using the parallel port, but the time-critical stuff is all in hardware.

      People now are building a LED blinker using arduino... I would just use two transistors or a 555 chip - much simpler and cheaper.

  14. Isn't this a micro managing issue? by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Look at it this way, some one was just killed by a bicycle and the blind deal with those everyday and they are just as quiet. 99% of the people benefiting from the sound will in fact be people that can't be bothered to look first. I've had gasoline running cars that were silent enough I didn't hear them approach. There does seem to be a touch of insanity making regulations that require noise pollution. Whether it's hydrogen or battery electric motor driven vehicles are likely the future so are we now setting a standard that we are committing to a future of gasoline engine sounding cars from here on out? To me it seems a little like demanding cars make the sound of horse hooves a 100 years ago so people were more comfortable with the transition.

    1. Re:Isn't this a micro managing issue? by HybridST · · Score: 1

      In the time it took to read your comment eighteen people have been pronounced doa from vehicle strikes. An hour from now another bike rider will strike and kill a pedestrian. Very different orders of magnitude even if 87% of all internet statistics are made up on the spot.

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    2. Re:Isn't this a micro managing issue? by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      I don't think people handled the transition to motor vehicles well 100+ years ago. There is always a subset of humanity that will complain about new technology.

      An example of not handling the new cars well is this bit of trivia - the first drivers licence belonged to Herr Benz for his first motorwagen. He had written to the local duke asking for a permit to operate the vehicle because he was worried about people being offended by the sound and smoke from the thing.

    3. Re:Isn't this a micro managing issue? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In the time it took to read your comment eighteen people have been pronounced doa from vehicle strikes.

      And if this will actually save lives, then most of them need to learn to turn their fucking head before turning the street. I have no compassion for anyone who has sight who doesn't look both ways before crossing the street. They not only deserve to die, they NEED to die before they get a chance to breed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Make it an extra... by Githaron · · Score: 2

    ... so the rest of us do not have to pay for the system if we decide to buy the car.

  16. Bubba Rub? by imag0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bubba Rub was a visionary

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnzw_i4YmKk

    Reporter: Can you tell me about the whistles?
    Bubb Rubb: The whistles go WOO-- You wanna WOO WOO--
    Reporter: Some neighbors are saying it’s “way too loud.”
    Bubb Rubb: That’s only in the mowrning. He’s supposed to be up cooking breakfast or something, so it’s like an alarm clock!

    1. Re:Bubba Rub? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is.... the greatest thing I've seen all day.

      Is it just me or did he tag a parked car on his way out??

  17. Yeah by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

    Either a TARDIS arriving sound or warp engine.

    BTW, there's a gauge on most cars that tell you how fast it's going. Just tossin that out there FYI.

    1. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, there's a gauge on most cars that tell you how fast it's going. Just tossin that out there FYI.

      I think that things tend to flash by faster as I start to speed up... has anyone else noticed this?

    2. Re:Yeah by flirno · · Score: 1

      Record two coconuts banging together repeatedly.

    3. Re:Yeah by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And it's totally correlated with that gauge thing! Weird!

  18. Download ringtones for your car!!!* by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    *Be sure to get your parent's permission first. $4.00 licensing fee per month.

    1. Re:Download ringtones for your car!!!* by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be a RUNtone?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  19. Actually... by Kiyyik · · Score: 1

    I understand that they're just taking four large playing cards, jamming them in the spokes of the wheels and leaving it at that.

  20. Another Cool Audi add-on by doston · · Score: 1

    I hear it has an optional TOPS-20 nav system installed with a Microsoft Bob-like GUI overlay for only $10,100

  21. Sounds like Tron Lightcycles to me by Wheels17 · · Score: 2

    All I could think of when I heard it is the Tron Lightcycle sound. A little high frequency filter and it's the same thing.

  22. Playing cards on the wheels... by jrmcc · · Score: 2

    Problem solved!!

  23. Royalty by tepples · · Score: 1

    How much would Warner Bros. Animation, owner of copyright in The Jetsons after it bought Hanna-Barbera, charge to license that signature sound?

    1. Re:Royalty by kimvette · · Score: 1

      It would fall under fair use; you would be sampling only about 200ms of audio and then loop it on playback, and maybe run it through a couple of variable effects filters (volume of course, and maybe flange and pitch) while accelerating and braking.

      Another great idea would be the sound of dried coconut husks (delivered by swallows to the recording studio of course) being clapped together.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  24. Don't install one? Your fault by tepples · · Score: 1

    That depends on whether you want to be held liable for wrongful death and/or guilty for vehicular manslaughter. Car insurers at the very least will probably require them.

    1. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Githaron · · Score: 1

      If someone is too stupid to look before walking into the street, they deserve to be run over.

    2. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by tepples · · Score: 1

      Where does this leave people who are not stupid yet unable to look, such as the blind?

    3. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... like ... the blind?

    4. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If they are just running out into the street, then they are stupid.
      If they are in a busy area, then they should use the crosswalk.

      In most cases they can't here the car anyways because of all the back ground noise.
      If you have to cross in the middle, then do so slowly.

      Yeah, it sucks being blind. That doesn't mean we need to implement a system that won't help.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone is too stupid to weight an ounce of prevention against hundred pounds of irreversible consequences and then doesn't see the irony of complaining about "stupid" people...

    6. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I can think of three ways off the top of my head for a blind man to walk across the street without getting hit by silent cars. Get a small handheld device that detects when big, fast-moving objects are coming by, walk with someone who can see, or have their seeing eye dog trained to not walk in front of a moving vehicle. If a blind person does not bother with any form of augmented traveling, then yes, they deserve to be hit by a car just as much as the guy who can see who walks into the street without looking.

    7. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Githaron · · Score: 1

      See my comment below.

    8. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Githaron · · Score: 1

      There is only a statistically small number of people who cannot see. With the increasing number of electric cars, it would be much cheaper and make a lot more sense to have seeing eye dogs trained for a little longer than to have every electric car fitted with additional equipment to make unnecessary noise. Actually, I doubt it would even take additional training considering the seeing eye dogs probably are already trained to look and not just listen.

    9. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the blind

    10. Re:Don't install one? Your fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like lights, signals and brake lights are only there to warn stupid people not paying attention right?

  25. Five blind peds are killed by automobiles a year by stomv · · Score: 5, Informative

    NHTSA FARS data, 2002-2006: 27 legally blind pedestrians were killed by automobiles. 27/5 == 5.4 per year. Blind people being run over by automobiles simply isn't a rampant problem. Blind people often rely on audio cues to cross the street, but not the sound of engines. Instead, the chirp or verbal commands from crosswalk signal heads is the audio cue for blind pedestrians, combined with the trust that motorists will look for peds when turning right at intersections.

    It's noise pollution, and it's oh so unnecessary.

  26. They should just use baseball cards by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Back in the old days, we just used baseball cards and clothespins to give our bikes sound effects.

    1. Re:They should just use baseball cards by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Back in the old days, we just used baseball cards and clothespins to give our bikes sound effects.

      Here, too! With a piece of string from the clothespin to the handle, so you could vary the sound.

      Also, it occurred to me today, as I was riding my bike to work, that some noise emitted from the bike would be useful too, to warn pedestrians. You have the bell, but it can be interpreted as rude if you ring it so you tend not to unless there's immediate danger.

  27. Two Different Issues by sunderland56 · · Score: 4, Informative
    There are two different issues being merged into one here:
    • Vehicle noise outside the car - to warn pedestrians/other motorists/etc. of the car's presence;
    • Vehicle noise inside the car - so the driver has a perception of how fast they are driving.

    A speaker making 'vroom vroom' noises outside the car does nothing for the driver - most modern Audi-class cars are so quiet inside you can barely hear an internal combustion engine. Some cars (even loud high-performance ones) already artifically add engine noise to the stereo system so the driver can gauge their speed.

    1. Re:Two Different Issues by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Noise outside the car is not required. The sound of tires on the road are already quite loud when the car is moving at anything higher than parking lot speeds.

      And at low velocities, given a new conventional engine and a decent muffler, you might not head a conventional car approaching anyways... so there is no real difference, unless you are going to also propose that they outlaw good mufflers.

      Noise inside the car is not required. An inexperienced driver is going to have to glance at a speedometer to know how fast they are going, and an experienced driver will be able to judge roughly how fast they are going by how quickly they appear to be passing things. The most you might need is a startup noise to inform the driver that the engine has successfully started... personally, I'd be partial to something along the lines of a bios POST beep, although I can easily see people wanting to use different (customizable) sounds for it.

    2. Re:Two Different Issues by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I'll take quite with a speedometer, thank you.
      And the wind noise will also be an indicators.
      Another indicator will be when everything in front of you starts to turn blue~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Two Different Issues by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A) HUD
      B) The top of a well position speedometer can be seen with the peripheral vision. The top is where you 45-75 should be.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Two Different Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Some cars ... already artifically add engine noise to the stereo system
      Been there, done that. Old car with a breaker-points distributor + non-resistor spark plugs = lot of "engine" noise on the radio.

      And to think, we used to spend time trying to get rid of that noise. What's next? A flooded carburetor and fading drum brakes simulator?

    5. Re:Two Different Issues by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some cars (even loud high-performance ones) already artifically add engine noise to the stereo system so the driver can gauge their speed.

      Wrong. The gauges tell the driver what the car is doing, and once you've used them for a while you should be able to tell by feel. The noise is piped into the car to help the driver feel smug about the powerful, expensive engine he's sitting behind.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Two Different Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quite... what?

  28. I hate this idea by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    I want my car silent.

    As to blind people crossing the road. That's just going to be a new challenge. I don't see why everyone in society has to have engine noise in otherwise silent cars just so blind people can tell cars are coming.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I hate this idea by geekoid · · Score: 1

      plus it's the drivers responsibility to look out for pedestrians.

      Anyways, in 5 years we will have self driving cars. Once that takes hold, the whole making noise thing is irrelevant.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I hate this idea by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      I want my car silent.

      As to blind people crossing the road. That's just going to be a new challenge. I don't see why everyone in society has to have engine noise in otherwise silent cars just so blind people can tell cars are coming.

      Because most people hate killing people more than they hate sound?

    3. Re:I hate this idea by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I have an even better idea: make noise ordinances and enforce them. The reason this thing needs to be noisy is because of all the other goddamn gratuitously loud vehicles: the Harleys with extra-loud aftermarket exhaust, the redneck pickups with rusted-out mufflers, the assholes with 120 dB subwoofers.

      Get rid of all that noise pollution and you'll stand a chance of hearing electric vehicles through the tire noise.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:I hate this idea by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself!

    5. Re:I hate this idea by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      wait... your notion is that other cars should be made to be quieter?

      Sigh... why are people so addicted to passing STUPID laws.

      Just leave it alone. No one cares what you think and no one should be forced to care. If people want noisy cars they'll buy them. If they don't, then they clearly disagree with you. It's their money and their choice. Making a car noisy is a stupid idea. And forcing electric cars to be nosier ignores that there are plenty of cars on the road that are exceptionally quiet. This is not a bad thing. it's a sign of good design. Noise is generally a sign of bad design. It means energy is being wasted on a vibration that isn't accomplishing anything. The same can be said of heat. The colder and quieter an engine is per horse power the more efficent it is... it's a good thing.

      If you put some stupid speaker on my car that is forced to make a noise when I move. I will break it. And do you know who will pull me over for that? No one.

      So please... pass a stupid law that will make everyone just that much more contemptuous of the legal system and that much more willing to disobey yet another stupid law.

      Every time you pass a new law you've made it easier to be a criminal and harder to be an upstanding citizen. At some point you'll cross a line and be outnumbered. At which point god help us all.

      Pass laws that NEED to be passed. Don't pass them simply because you're bored.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:I hate this idea by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Ah, the libertarian argument: I want to be a dick and the government shouldn't be able to stop me.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:I hate this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you pass a new law you've made it easier to be a criminal and harder to be an upstanding citizen. At some point you'll cross a line and be outnumbered. At which point god help us all.

      Yes, people will become a murderous mass if you don't let them blow your eardrums. Logic, you haz it.

    8. Re:I hate this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right. Fuck the blind.
      Also, fuck the people hit from behind by irresponsible drivers that they never heard coming.

    9. Re:I hate this idea by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      How am I being a dick for wanting my car to be quiet?

      Oh that's right... I'm not.

      Should I counter that your argument is the statists argument... "boss everyone around because we think society is made up of stupid peasants that wouldn't wipe their asses if there weren't a relevant law"?

      Every time you pass a stupid law you erode the credibility of the state. Every time you make it harder for someone to not be a criminal you create more criminals.

      Go for it. This is one of the many stupid laws out there that is totally unenforceable. Follow this one up by passing a law against nose picking in the privacy of your own home.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  29. Of all the idiotic ideas.... by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh noes... the car is too quiet! It could sneak up on somebody before they hear it!!!!

    Give me a break.

    Seriously... this is just such a colossally stupid idea that it had to be dreamed up by lawyers.

    In some newer conventional engine cars, you have to strain to listen for the engine, when its on a low speed. Are they going to now require that mufflers not cut out more than certain amount of sound?

    And at higher speeds, you're going to hear the sound of the tires on the road LONG before you hear the sound of engine, unless, again, the engine is an older one or the muffler isn't doing it's job correctly.

    Are they going to also require that bicycles have such noisemakers installed? What about motorized wheelchairs? Both can cause extremely serious injury to people when moving at high velocities.

    This idea is just so incredibly stupid that it gives me a headache just trying to imagine the mentality of people who thought it was a good notion.

    1. Re:Of all the idiotic ideas.... by firewrought · · Score: 1

      This idea is just so incredibly stupid that it gives me a headache just trying to imagine the mentality of people who thought it was a good notion.

      This may be difficult to follow, but I think the "mentality" is that adding a certain amount of road noise will um save lives. We currently have about 5000 pedestrian deaths/year due to vehicular collisions. That number will go up if all cars on the road go silent. No one knows what net increase will be, but it will be positive. If you assume the increase is going to be low (say one or two dozen deaths per year) and you want really silent cars, you might think this is all silly. If you think that number is going to be high (say one or two thousand deaths per year) and you're responsible for the overall safety characteristics of particular vehicle model for a major automotive manufacturer, you might think this is worth researching ahead of time.

      (Incidentally, note that the article is talking about in-cabin noise, not exterior noise. The same mentality applies though... less cabin noise means faster driving means more deaths.)

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    2. Re:Of all the idiotic ideas.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      This may be difficult to follow, but I think the "mentality" is that adding a certain amount of road noise will um save lives

      So will outlawing cars. I don't see anyone seriously pushing for that.

      Seriously, has there actually been any objective study that conclusively showed that electric cars are any more hazardous in this respect than a car with a new engine and a good muffler?

    3. Re:Of all the idiotic ideas.... by bachelors_hall · · Score: 1
      There have been silent cars around for a century: they're made by 'Rolls-Royce' and their silence has always been one of their selling points. And they really are _silent_ when in top condition. I have frequently been in Rolls-Royce cars (of any age from 1 to 100 years) and not realised the engine was running at all until it started moving.

      At the RR factory they had signs saying "BEWARE SILENT MOTOR CARS" at points where people and car's paths crossed.

      And now Rolls-Royce is about to release their first electric car. How ironic would it be for them to have to make it their first noisy one?

    4. Re:Of all the idiotic ideas.... by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me: "Attempting to make a stupid standard a standard instead of enforcing a smart moral". We already have enough deaths caused by drivers who lacks severe amount of driving skill, lacks attention spawn, does not stay far behind other cars when in high speed, ignoring the pedestrians, and can barely give appropiate warnings.
      Adding false noise is just another excuse to be lazy, instead of learning how to appropriately use the cars horns, and not stopping when people attempt to jaywalk at places where there are no normal crossings. I don't want to know how many drivers there are on the road that should not even be driving, but to excusing them is inexcusable.

    5. Re:Of all the idiotic ideas.... by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me: "Attempting to make a stupid standard a standard instead of enforcing a smart moral". ... Adding false noise is just another excuse to be lazy.

      You can pursue both a design-based approach ("standards") and a blame-based approach ("moral?") simultaneously. Whether a benefit can be realized by legal threats, public service campaigns, or some other way of cajoling/guilting people into avoiding a particular behavior is not really relevant to the designer who sees an effective design tradeoff that will save lives in absolute terms, regardless of who's to blame.

      Taking the mentality that you're going to avoid pragmatic solutions because people "should" avoid particular behaviors is dogmatic and ineffective. Evangelicals make the same mistake when they advocate abstinence-only sex ed. It's as if they'd preferred to "up the anty" on teens misbehaving rather than reduce teen pregnancy and abortions.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  30. I prefer to spend my gasoline on MPG... by junglebeast · · Score: 1

    Burns gas and ozone for no reason.

    1. Re:I prefer to spend my gasoline on MPG... by Fned · · Score: 1

      Gasoline? WTF?

  31. The music in Family Guy by Rhacman · · Score: 1

    The bus traveling music that accompanies Peter in the Family Guy episode where he wishes for his own theme music.

    At around 0:50 in this poorly captured clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN9GAApDpsw

    Or, perhaps the bus theme music in Earthbound: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVv5CuKgAzg

    --
    Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
  32. It's not only cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Haven't you wondered why your digital camera makes a shutter noise? In some cases including a motordrive sound.

    1. Re:It's not only cars by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      My digital camera is an SLR, it makes noise because that is the way it works.

      My other digital camera makes no noise at all.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    2. Re:It's not only cars by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      It's made to provide feedback to the user. I turn it off the moment I power it on for the first time. I kind of wish my SLR was quieter (or silent) to be honest.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:It's not only cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, no not really, my digital camera has a mechanical shutter...

  33. The time is not spent on development by iONiUM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rest assured, from the technical side they could do it very quickly, as you outlined.

    The problem is more than likely in market research. Bringing people in, asking them to listen to 50 varieties of car noises and judging them, to find just the "right" one that is pleasant, audible, but not overpowering, and most importantly better than any competitors.

    Just like software development for consumers, often it's the UX/UI that is very time consuming and nit-picky, not the actual software itself.

    1. Re:The time is not spent on development by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Funny

      The overpriced luxury manufacturer brings people in and asks them to listen to 50 varieties of car noise to find the best one.

      The smart carmaker uses the sound of a moped by default and then sells hundreds of expansion packs with samples of different car engines so that the customers can choose their own favorites.

      The really smart carmaker rents the expansion packs with a monthly fee like ringtones.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:The time is not spent on development by stevenfuzz · · Score: 2

      The really really really smart car-maker spends 10 seconds to figure out that faking engine noise is a total waste of time and car electricity.

    3. Re:The time is not spent on development by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      The really really really smart car-maker spends 10 seconds to figure out that faking engine noise is a total waste of time

      ... and later goes out of business due to lawsuits filed by people injured by its "stealth cars".

      and car electricity.

      Think about how much electricity it takes to move two tons of mass at highway speeds. Now think about how much electricity it takes to power a single medium-sized speaker.

      I think you'll see that electricity usage is not a significant concern here.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:The time is not spent on development by HybridST · · Score: 1

      This could be accomplished on the net-even right here on /. . Your user-base would need standardized audio gear so every audio file would need to be 'mastered' to a soundcard and headphone combination shared by every tester. 50 'kits' could be assembled for under ten thousand dollars imo. The rest of the sticker-price of a single car could cover the costs of an audio engineer creating the master files as well as a marketing team to find 50 ocd geeks to install their audio gear in their own systems and rate the sounds. Volumes could be controlled by software to minimize the effects of the fletscher-munson curve to audio loudnesses across the sound spectrum. Non-standard connectors would ensure that the headphones are directly in the provided soundcard which could be usb. It should be possible to make the software a linux variant live-cd like mint or puppy with a single icon in the desktop environment labelled 'Car Engine Noises like Vroom Vruum' or somesuch. This is back-of-the-envelope feasable and I, for one, would welcome the opportunity to shape a sound to be heard by *billions* of people.

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
  34. The Marching Morons by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this in the above novella (or something like it)?

    I vaguely remember reading some story years ago about how they made cars for the stupid people that actually went really slowly, but had huge tail-fins & made really impressive growly engine noises, so as to fool the drivers into thinking they were going a lot faster than they were.

    1. Re:The Marching Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that's the one. Published in Omni in the mid-80s.

      "I'd buy that for a dollar!" Shamelessly ripped off by (Robocop? I think?).

  35. I Despise The Whole Idea by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Noise pollution is one of the biggest banes of living in urban areas, and to say that automobiles contribute significantly to noise pollution is a major understatement.

    Sure, keep them quiet, and a few more people will die every year. Mostly stupid people.

    I say it's worth it, for reducing the noise and proven stress levels they cause, which everybody else has to deal with.

  36. What about the people next to the road by nicolaiplum · · Score: 1

    What about the people who live next to a road? Or people walking along a separated pavement (sidewalk to the Americans) next to a road? Quieter cars benefit them all - in fact the reason we have maximum noise restrictions on cars at all is to reduce noise pollution to others.

    Why should we require noise pollution?

    Is this going to be some attempt to legislate that urban areas have as much vehicle noise in future, as they do today and no less?

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
    1. Re:What about the people next to the road by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if it's one of those, "In order to avoid lawsuits."

      We have electric cars and hybrid cars and cars with really quiet internal combustion engines. And yet, somehow, the number of people getting run over hasn't appreciably increased. But it could happen. And if it did, it would be, "Oh, if only the car had made noise, that person would be alive today! It's the automaker's fault! Let's sue them for billions of dollars!"

    2. Re:What about the people next to the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They made the decision to live next to the road with noisy cars. Nothing changes.

  37. Mini-Horn? by Sperbels · · Score: 2

    As a bicyclist, I sometimes get the shit scared out of me when I'm riding on the road and a really quiet car passes. I can get so startled that I swerve. Maybe cars could have two horns. The regular one that busts people's ear drums, and a small beeper type horn that you could use to alert pedestrians and cyclists to your presence.

    1. Re:Mini-Horn? by geekoid · · Score: 0

      maybe you should pay attention?

      They make these great things called mirrors, you might want to look into that.

      heh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Mini-Horn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a bicyclist also. I ride in downtown traffic all the time and rely on engine noise to tell me when cars are approaching from behind. Cars need to make noise, even better noise that changes with their speed. Not just for pedestrians, but cyclists also. It doesn't need to be much, just enough to tell me it's there. When traveling fast, I can't be checking over my shoulder all the time, especially when I need to react fast to someone opening a door in front of me.  It's a small price to pay for safety.

    3. Re:Mini-Horn? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      They make these great things called mirrors, you might want to look into that.

      Yeah. Just hasn't been that big of a problem yet. I still think the mini-beeper is a good idea though. I just wanted a written record of it here on /. so that in 40 years when every car has one, I can prove to my grandkids that it was my idea...and I wasn't always a stupid old curmudgeon afraid of cranial implants and household robots.

    4. Re:Mini-Horn? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      I'm a bicyclist also. I ride in downtown traffic all the time and rely on engine noise to tell me when cars are approaching from behind.

      Then you're eventually going to be hit. Get in the habit of looking over your shoulder.

      P.S. You also shouldn't be riding so close to cars that you can get doored.

      P.P.S. I'm a cyclist.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    5. Re:Mini-Horn? by PPH · · Score: 1

      City horns. Cars in Europe have had these for years. More so in the past, I think. But I've seen them (heard them).

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Mini-Horn? by horza · · Score: 1

      Too late, urban trams already have this. They have a "ding ding" which they use to signal to somebody they think is too close and a larger horn much like a car when there is danger of a collision. If you want a good idea for the grandkids, throw in a third beeper that signals "thank you". I'd love that.

      Phillip.

    7. Re:Mini-Horn? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      I think there would more demand for a third horn that screams insults at bad drivers.

    8. Re:Mini-Horn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The regular one that busts people's ear drums, and a small beeper type horn that you could use to alert pedestrians and cyclists to your presence.

      Yes! And then we could get rid of the regular one.

    9. Re:Mini-Horn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly the same, but check out: http://screaming-banshee.com/

      It was designed for motorcycles to do exactly that, normal horn for short "notification chirps," but an extended press would automatically issue a wicked loud air horn. Removes the thinking step between selecting horns.

    10. Re:Mini-Horn? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      This is not a problem which can be solved with a shopping trip.

      Bicycle mirrors either get damaged in bicycle racks or stolen. Mirrors that are compact and durable are too small to be seen while riding on bumpy under-maintained city streets. Helmet mirrors are great for long trips, but too fragile for daily commuting.

      As a cyclist, I've grown used to not trusting my ears. Silent cars were the first problem, but now e-bikes are very common, often overtake within inches and don't ring their bells. I look more carefully now. Just because I don't hear a vehicle doesn't mean that somebody isn't inches from me.

  38. Audi's aren't that quiet inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most modern Audi-class cars are so quiet inside you can barely hear an internal combustion engine.

    I drive a 2000 Audi A4 Quattro with the 30-valve V6. It is not very quiet inside at all. I have to crank the stereo up pretty high to hear over the engine and road noise on the highway. Maybe the newest, and most expensive Audi's, like the A8, are quieter, but the little ones are as noisy as there Volkswagen counterparts.

    1. Re:Audi's aren't that quiet inside by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but a twelve year old car isn't modern. It's obviously still perfectly good for the purpose, but not modern anymore.

    2. Re:Audi's aren't that quiet inside by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I guess that make my car and motorcycle ancient. My car is 23 years old, and my bike is 32.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    3. Re:Audi's aren't that quiet inside by horza · · Score: 1

      Actually it makes it a Classic car, and in the UK you would no longer have to pay road tax any more. Give it another couple of decades and it will become an Antique car. You need to get something pre-1930 for it to be a Vintage car. Ancient? Probably have to buy one off Barney Rubble.

      Phillip.

    4. Re:Audi's aren't that quiet inside by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? My car is 30+ years old, and while the insurance is really cheap on it as it qualifies as a classic car, I still need to pay road tax on it AFAIK.

      Or do I have to fill in a particular form in order to register my car as "classic" for road tax purposes?

  39. Clippety-clop clippety-clop neigggggh by Freddybear · · Score: 1

    Since somebody beat me to the Jetson's car sound, I suggest the Monty Python clippety-clop coconut sound. As an extra bonus, a horse whinny for a braking sound.

  40. Re:Five blind peds are killed by automobiles a yea by Lothsahn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NHTSA FARS data, 2002-2006: 27 legally blind pedestrians were killed by automobiles. 27/5 == 5.4 per year.

    Who cares about facts, won't someone please think about the blind children?

    --
    -=Lothsahn=-
  41. I see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    second coming of crazy frog!!!!

  42. Great by geekoid · · Score: 1

    so instead of people having bumper stickers, they'll have audio commercials...

    wait a minute. I wonder if I could get a cheaper car if it played commercials?

    hmm

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  43. If you need to be heard by pedestrians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use the horn.

    1. Re:If you need to be heard by pedestrians by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Why the hell is this downvoted?
      It's the perfect solution: really. That's what the horn is for, and it really does work even with blind people.

  44. I take it by publiclurker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You've never been in a parking lot with any of these electric cars. Without any engine noise, it's hard enough for a sighted person to tell if a car is going to back up or not. I'd hate to be my blind co-worker.

    1. Re:I take it by fredklein · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are these things called back-up lights....

    2. Re:I take it by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 1

      ...Which blind folks can't see.
      Hence, blind.

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
    3. Re:I take it by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I really do not want to point this out but...
      At what point do we stop designing the world for the deaf and the blind.
      Really.
      Blind people should not be on the road.
      Stupid people should not be warned about hair dryers and showers.
      Uncoordinated people ordering hot coffee might get burned.
      Can we please stop designing to the lowest common denominator?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    4. Re:I take it by Kongming · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've never been in a parking lot with any of these electric cars. Without any engine noise, it's hard enough for a sighted person to tell if a car is going to back up or not. I'd hate to be my blind co-worker.

      For many modern cars with internal combustion engines, I hear their wheel noise at low speeds before I hear the engine. Certainly, some of them are quiet enough that I am not confident that I could tell if one was about to back up. Personally, I would prefer less background noise, as it makes it easier for me to pick out sounds that are actually close to me.

      --
      (no sig)
    5. Re:I take it by neurophil12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We choose to be a courteous society; something you might appreciate when a disease or accident takes your sight or hearing. Blind people don't have a choice about whether to not to be on the road, unless you want to pay for every blind person to have a servant who does everything for them. I'm quite certain most blind people would prefer their autonomy over being forced from streets due to a preventable danger though. If you want to argue about whether a particular practice or technology is sensible, fine, but you're just being a troll.

    6. Re:I take it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about redesigning parking lots so people don't have to walk behind cars. A aisle down the middle of facing cars would work. It'd be safer for everyone.

    7. Re:I take it by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Listen closer, electric cars make a higher pitched, and definitely quieter, whirring sound as they move. That's just the motors, too - the tires make noise as well.

    8. Re:I take it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That don't come until you shift into reverse that can take almost zero time.

    9. Re:I take it by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      And there was me thinking it was the drivers responsibilty to not hit vulnerable road users, not the vulnerable road users responsibilty to get-the-hell-out-of-my-way. (FWIW I am usually in the latter group.)

    10. Re:I take it by olden · · Score: 1

      I can't comment on other EVs but at least on the Nissan Leaf, that subtle "something mechanical" sound you may hear when such vehicle move at very low, parking-lot speeds... well, it's not from the motor, inaudible when developing virtually no power, but from a small audio speaker. A very good feature if you ask me.

      Good background info etc@ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_vehicle_warning_sounds

    11. Re:I take it by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      A lot of modern ICE vehicles are nearly silent too...I think they should get noisemakers as well.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    12. Re:I take it by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      You just haven't experienced it yet. Hybrids also have more efficient and quieter tires.

      It's bad on a bicycle at speed too. You shoulder check and *woah*, there's a car two meters from your back wheel.

      Once the car is going past 50kph, I don't see any point in these sounds, but maybe there's a reason I haven't thought of.

    13. Re:I take it by konaya · · Score: 1

      Hm, good point. Perhaps back-up lights should come with back-up signalling horns by default? No, that'd be too annoying. But how about having very-short-range radio warning beacons in every back-up light, and have all hard-sighted people equipped with a receiver?

    14. Re:I take it by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      How about redesigning parking lots so people don't have to walk behind cars. A aisle down the middle of facing cars would work. It'd be safer for everyone.

      Some parking lots are designed this way. But it's, you know, expensive: an elevated island in the middle of each couple of rows, wide enough so that encroaching cars still leave enough walking room. Next thing you know, you can't pack as many cars as the property owners would like. And even then, people would jaywalk everywhere because it's a goddamned parking lot.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    15. Re:I take it by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Why is it that everything is the responsibility of society to pay for?
      Courteous is one thing. Enabling is another.
      We spend tons of cash paying farmers not to grow crops.
      We spend even more making sure that people can afford to buy food.
      We allow people to steal money from the government through the banks with "loan modifications".
      We have people in the street demanding more free shit is their right.
      Teachers that do not have to teach, union workers that get to be paid for not working.
      We vote in politicians that lie to us over and over again.
      Society my friend is ruining people. Ruining neighborhoods, ruining personal responsibility.
      Society has failed. Has failed and is continuing to move in the direction of their failure.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    16. Re:I take it by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Most of this is bullshit, and it's probably all well and good until you become one of these people.

    17. Re:I take it by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Been one.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    18. Re:I take it by icylucifer · · Score: 1

      Also. many manufacturers seem to be overloading the function of those back-up lights as "illuminate the area around the car just after the engine has been turned off or the doors have been unlocked remotely lights". I can't count the number of times I've stopped to prevent a car from backing out of a parking space into me... only to realize that the car's driver is fifty feet away and the lights just haven't gone off yet.

      --
      Endut! Hoch Hech!
    19. Re:I take it by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      It's the same sound I hear from my Honda CR-Z's electric motor, which indicates it's either from some of the electronics or the electric motor itself, and not a speaker, as the CR-Z is a hybrid. I can hear it on the CR-Z much more clearly at higher rates of acceleration than just cruising at 10mph, but it's always there.

    20. Re:I take it by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      After listening to a video of the Leaf's sound, it's not the same as the one I hear. The approach sound is far louder and more obnoxious than the sound I heard. Presumably, the sound I heard was turned off, as it was a dealer driving the car temporarily, and it is manually enabled.

    21. Re:I take it by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I don't know about many manufacturers. I may be wrong, but as far as I can tell only GM does this.

  45. Liars by The+Raven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article is a lie. Audi didn't do this for safety... they did it because engine noises produce an emotional response. We are conditioned to tie the power of the vehicle to the sound it makes. Audi has a reputation for fast cars, and a silent car does not provide the same emotional feedback, thus reducing the perceived value of the vehicle to the consumer. This is particularly true of the all-important test drive... even if you can disable the sound later, by default they want you to feel the horsepower in your gut when you hit that pedal for the first time.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:Liars by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And further we know it's a lie because BMW totally copped to it on THEIR new car that does the same thing, and Audi wishes so very badly they could be BMW.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  46. Well... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    If they weren't sop stupid as to be blind then Githaron wouldn't have to worry about anyone but himself, now would he.

    1. Re:Well... by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I am not saying I would not try to stop if someone walked out in front of my car. What I am saying is that getting run over is the natural consequence of not looking before walking into the street. What is even worse is that the person that walks in front of a moving vehicle is not only endangering their own life but also the life of the driver. How bad would you feel if you caused someone to swerve into a tree and die because you decided not to look before walking across the street.

  47. Choosing which noise... by GameMaster · · Score: 1

    "one day, you may only get to choose which noise your car makes, rather than whether it does."

    Me and Mr. side-cutters beg to differ...

    --

    Rules of Conduct:
    #1 - The DM is always right.
    #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  48. Deja vu all over again by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 5, Informative

    The nonsense about electric cars is no different. It's just attempts by the lobbying department of interested automobile makers (the ones who aren't adapting to the 21st century) using bribed republicans and regulatory capture to try to create artificial barriers to adoption against their competition.

    A very long time ago steam was the proven technology, electric cars were considered quiet and civilized, and gas engine cars were the noisy, dangerous, smelly upstarts. The gas engine car manufacturers engaged in a major FUD campaign against electric cars. They were dangerous! They were so quiet you couldn't hear them coming...

    We have an active electric vehicle club here in Vancouver. The loudest noise their best conversions make is the whirr of the tires, sometimes with a slight groan from their power controllers. They have a 1912 Detroit electric car, and it's almost completely silent.

    Our bus system has one of the larger fleets of electric trolley buses in the western world. They too are very quiet, but people get used to looking for them before crossing the street.

    ...laura

    1. Re:Deja vu all over again by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      So there ARE other veva people on here! BTW, not only is there an original 1912 detroit, but it still runs great (personal experience)! ... Doug

    2. Re:Deja vu all over again by horza · · Score: 5, Informative

      We have a tram system in Nice and one of the key selling features is how quiet it is. They run straight through all the major squares and streets with no barriers, yet people manage to avoid them without any problem. However just in case they have a horn which when they press a button it goes "beep".

      When I get an electric car one of the things I will enjoy reducing is the noise pollution as much as any other kind. I don't see the problem with Audi making engine sounds, it's just nobody is going to buy an Audi,

      Phillip.

    3. Re:Deja vu all over again by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Informative

      The loudest noise their best conversions make is the whirr of the tires

      At low speeds, EVs indeed only have a whirr from their tires. High speeds are another matter: in even gas-engine cars these days, the tires are the major noise-producing component. I remember a while back, Ferrari even had trouble with regulations in Europe because some car of theirs exceeded the drive-by noise limit, not because of its V12 engine, but because of its tires. Gas engines these days are rather quiet, but there's only so much you can do about tire noise, and higher-performing tires generally make more noise (while also increasing safety: the longest-wearing, lowest rolling-resistance tires are also generally the ones with the worst grip, and unless you never turn, lack of grip is a very bad thing, and it's even worse in wet conditions).

    4. Re:Deja vu all over again by theswimmingbird · · Score: 1

      I went through Nice a few years ago with Marshall University's Jazz Band when we played in the Antibes Jazz Festival. Absolutely gorgeous city. I would love to live there myself some day.

  49. they don't always have right of way by Chirs · · Score: 1

    Around here pedestrians have right of way *at crosswalks*, either explicit or implicit (generally where a sidewalk continues across both sides of an intersection).

    A pedestrian who steps out into traffic in the middle of the block where there is no crosswalk definitely does NOT have right of way.

  50. Wrong Answer by mjallison · · Score: 1

    This has bothered me for several years. One of the beauties of an electric car is the lack of noise. Humans have a strange relationship to sound. I see many articles where people want cars to sound like cars, yet I have friends who are surprised that my robotic vacuum (Roomba) is "so noisy". I stand on street corners and feel assaulted by the noise from dozens of idling engines providing no useful work and wonder how nice it would be to drop the sound level on our streets. It's noisy now with lots of idling internal combustion engines, but imagine if we have dozens of different noises, all customized from regular engine noise, futuristic space noise, to Nyan Cat. Is this the sort of environment we want? Cacophony. I am sympathetic to the plight of sight impaired people, they currently rely upon sound, but quiet vehicles already produce problems for them, and as drivers we MUST be careful of ALL pedestrians. I'm not sure the solution is to replicate old technology by imitating old noises. There must be a better solution than hacking something on to a relatively clean and simple system.

  51. Re:My suggestion: Just like Ringtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Jetsons.

    If I ever get to choose my own sound, it will be this.

    Here we go...Customize your car sound with downloadable "cartones".
    I choose the sound of baseball cards on the spokes of a bicycle!

  52. Coconut Shells by gregor-e · · Score: 4, Funny

    Coconut shells cloppity-clopping. Perhaps with a minstrel singing a ballad recounting the bravery of the driver.

  53. This is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do I get rid of this "feature". It's pointless. Lets also make Ethernet cards sound like modems.
    If you are casually walking and being distracted while crossing a street:
    1- You deserve to die. Natural selection chose your dumb ass.
    2- You are gonna get ran over by a noisy car too.

  54. how fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a car that is too quiet means the driver won't be able to tell how fast he/she is driving........ um.............. it is called a speedometer. it works like this.. it senses the vehicles speed, and displays it right in front of you. so..... that.... you.... know.... how.... fast.... you.... are.... driving.... seriously... who doesn't know this?

  55. UH-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If any choice is possible, why not go for broke in terms of being really loud and obnoxious? So why not a UH-1 "Huey"?

    Then not only will people hear you, but they'll be looking for where the hell that really low flying helicopter is.

    For the extra bit of win, get a loop of "Ride of the Valkyries" to play in addition.

  56. How is this news? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    General Motor's EV1 was deliberately designed with a noise generator because it was too quiet.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  57. New things are well-forgotten old things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they put a horse's head on the hood, too? You know, so horses wouldn't be afraid of the carriages moving by themselves.

  58. Top ten list for awesome car sounds by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    I see a huge modding community on the horizon...

    I know, right? Here are several sounds I will mod into my first electric

    1) The sound of a fomula1 car driving at full speed.
    2) The sounds of a rabbit screaming as it is ripped apart by a pack of hungry dogs.
    3) Automatic weapon fire. If that doesn't discourage nearby jaywalkers, nothing will.
    4) A steam locomotive sound. Bonus points for the steam whistle.
    5) A looped sample of a teen comedy scene where someone is taking a dump in a bathroom.
    6) UHF white noise.
    7) Overly excited commentator narration from the Daytona 500 (..ANDHEREHECOMESDOWNTHEBACKSTRETCHOHNOBOBBYJOHNESJRHASACCIDENTALLYTAPPEDHISREAR PANNELITSATOTALWIPEOUT!)
    8) looped slurping sounds
    9) looped dubstep music, played in reverse. (Who could tell the difference?)
    10) The David Letterman reading 10 ten lists.


    All of these would be played the an enhanced PA system I'd mod on the car to generate up to 110db of sound, because we wouldn't want anyone to not hear me coming.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Top ten list for awesome car sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the Taurus synth bass sound from the intro to "Don't Stand So Close to Me." :)

    2. Re:Top ten list for awesome car sounds by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      All of these would be played the an enhanced PA system I'd mod on the car to generate up to 110db of sound, because we wouldn't want anyone to not hear me coming.

      But... if you're like me, you'll get pulled over for "disturbing the peace" for your non-deliberate courtesy to pedestrians and other traffic, not to mention your own pleasurable enjoyment of all those high-decibal sounds at every human-detectable wavelength (whether by sound or just by feel). Nevermind the fact that you're allowed to use a lawn mower or chainsaw at almost any time, as long as it's not after 9 or 10 at night. I got pulled over in the early afternoon (around 3 or 4), was given a ticket, and was required to appear in court for simply blasting the song "Crazy Bitch" by Buckcherry a few years ago. Considering I'm almost always moving while in my car and typically turn down the volume a bit at stop signs and red lights or in other situations when the traffic is moving slowly, I don't know how I was "disturbing the peace" any more than the typical lawn mower, but whatever--fuck them. The officer claimed he could hear my car from 100 yards away... can't remember exactly, but I think that's what he and my ticket said, but seriously, it'll take me maybe 2 minutes of driving (even at 25 MPH) to stop being heard by someone in an area, if that. So seriously, compared to a lawn mower, what does it fucking hurt? Other than the fact that I am not blaring nigger music?

      The pig kept trying to find something... literally ANYTHING... that he could to bust my ass on and get a win, because apprently loud music alone was not a good enough case for him, but he failed miserably. Seatbelt? Fail, Mr. Officer, I had it on, and so did the passenger (my friend). Driver's license, registration? Fail again--I had all the documentation I needed, I was insured, and the car was in my name. Turn signals, general driving maneuvers? Once again, I was following all of the laws. He kept looking in the car for any suspicions (including drugs--what a shock) that would help his case. He also kept interrogating me to find out if I was fucking doped up or something, repeatedly asking the same completely pointless questions about my audio setup--he must have asked how much power was going to my subs and my four internal speakers at least four fucking times. I was seriously getting sick of him asking and I would be surprised if he could not tell.

      I should've turned the car off to save some gas like I often do at train stops, but I wasn't expected to be pulled over for fucking 25-30 minutes over one god damn song. But once again, it wasn't just music--it was white music in a fucked up black town. But oh, no! The lyrics were offensive! They talk about that dreaded thing called sex and aren't afraid to call it by the word "fuck!" And they say Crazy Bitch! Oh no, that somehow makes it even worse! I would like to point them toward all those god damn niggers in this city that blast shitty fucking rap "music" (if you can really call it that) with even more blatantly bad (and even more blatantly violent) lyrics. Not that my preferred types of music are generally less violent (black metal, death metal), but at least the average human (including pig) cannot understand the singer. If I was a fucking nigger listening to rap about fucking and beating bitches and robbing banks for the Benjamins, I probably wouldn't have been bothered.

      There are good cops and there are bad cops. The one that got me was a fucking dick, and I can only laugh that he failed miserably to get me for anything other than loud music. Take that, motherfucker. The judge was semi-cool, though, because he was joking, saying that if I was listening to country music, the cops wouldn't mind that and I wouldn't have been bothered. At least he was nice and had a sense of humor. Still--I was given a higher fine for loud music than another guy in the courtroom before me who was caught crossing railroad tracks, while the railroad crossing gates were aparently

    3. Re:Top ten list for awesome car sounds by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Maybe they just had a dragnet out for assholes and you were the catch of the day...

    4. Re:Top ten list for awesome car sounds by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      While your No 4 is my preference, you forgot the obvious "Ride of the Valkyrie", and the less obvious emulated police helicopter, with optional "Step away from the road, and put your hands up" voice-over.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Top ten list for awesome car sounds by boristdog · · Score: 1

      I just want a loop of the "Sanford and Son" theme playing whenever I am in a parking lot.

  59. fart mod by erroar · · Score: 1

    yes please

  60. Instead... by stevenfuzz · · Score: 1

    How about Audi funds a free class for drivers which teaches them the importance of not running over pedestrians.

  61. pulse and glide by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

    I don't drive a hybrid but at idle the engine is pretty quiet. I use a hypermiling technique called "pulse and glide" where you accelerate up to speed and then let the car glide for a while in neutral.

    During the glide the tire noise is much louder than the engine. I have to wonder if differences between tire noise is more dangerous than differences between ICE and electric motors. Depending on the tires I could easily imagine an ICE car being quieter than a hybrid. Some tires are very quiet.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  62. Re:What more could you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laws, regulations, circus. You are new here; have a nice stay.

  63. Cartones! by Centurix · · Score: 1

    The theme song from Benny Hill
    The Spanish Fly music

    Both of these slow down and speed up with the car.

    --
    Task Mangler
  64. Re:Five blind peds are killed by automobiles a yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your car is silent you also support terrorism and kiddieporn.
    Are we running out of real issues to spend energy on?

  65. old news like real old by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

    they did this in the late 70s. i saw it on thats incredable. you could pic like 1 of 4 cars and it hooked up to disributer to know how fast to sound.

    --
    OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  66. Anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else think that governments shouldn't be involved in someone else's business of buying or selling a product or service? I will seriously weep if cars are forced by law to be noisy...

    Plus, by the time silent cars are very popular, blind people will have google glasses that have wires that connect straight into the visual centers in their brain and form images using microsoft kinect technology and it'd costs 1 bitcoin (which is a world standard and been revised without the current paper-trail flaws).

    This is of course if libertarian positions became popular lol.

  67. When is it safe to use the crosswalk? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If [blind people] are in a busy area, then they should use the crosswalk.

    But if all cars are electric and dang near silent, how do they know when the cross traffic has stopped and it is safe to use the crosswalk? I've read rumors that some cities have installed audible pedestrian signals, but I've never seen one.

  68. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it sounds like the Crazy Frog engine, I'm going to limit driving only to the vaccum of space.

  69. It's not supposed to make that noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  70. Auto Industry Only Knows One Tune ... by n8r0n · · Score: 1

    ... and that's the hum of an internal combustion engine.

    The attempt to make electric cars sound like ICEs is silly. First, it's motivated by people attempting to use their guts to determine what constitutes a safety feature. It's all very intuitive to think that a noisy car is safer. Except that it really isn't. Pedestrians don't rely heavily on their sense of sound to avoid getting hit. They just don't. Spend time watching pedestrians at an intersection, and you'll realize that they're either (a) not paying attention at all, or (b) using their sight to avoid cars.

    Trying to use sound to avoid collisions is problematic for two reasons. First, because all the other cars in the vicinity that don't pose an immediate threat are also making noise, the noise of cars closer to you gets drowned out. Second, because it's very hard to tell where a sound is coming from, especially in urban environments, where sounds reflect off buildings. Do the experiment yourself. Close your eyes, and listen for cars, and see if you can tell where they are. It's extremely difficult.

    Electric cars also are not silent to start off with. They still produce wind noise, and tire noise, like other cars.

    But, perhaps the biggest logical farce is that these noisemakers are being justified based on a multi-year study done by NHTSA, whereby hybrids got into a higher number of accidents with pedestrians than conventional cars, and at low speeds, hybrids work similarly to electric cars (can be quieter). The factor by which hybrids got into more ped accidents was about 1.4 (40% more). That's not a huge amount more, but it certainly is noticeable.

    The problem is that the study did not account for the environment hybrids tend to operate in. With half of this country living in urban vs. rural settings, you don't see hybrids represented equally in both. By a two to one ratio, you see more hybrids among city dwellers. And if you look at overall pedestrian accident data, you'll see that pedestrian accidents are twice as likely in urban environments. So, the increased rate of ped accidents with hybrids can probably be explained completely by simply understanding that they operate in riskier environments.

    The study also only attempts to address accidents caused by the car making the noise (or not). The study makes no attempt to understand that aside from the car that actually hits the pedestrian, every other car in the vicinity was making noise that made it harder for that particular car to be heard. Electric cars make the environment quieter for everybody, which could have a small beneficial effect that makes it less likely for all the cars around them to go unnoticed, because of ambient noise. In game theory terms, this is a true Prisoner's Dilemma, where the automakers are concluding that every car should be noisy, in an attempt to out-noisy the rest, paying no attention to the net effect of all the noise pollution.

    When you consider these factors, you realize that the overall affect on pedestrian safety from quiet cars is very small. Certainly nowhere near the 40% figure that's spawned this hysteria.

    This is really just an attempt by the auto industry, that is really looking for excuses to say, "we just can't build cars competitively any other way ... and thus were right all along to populate the planet with pollution machines". It's pretty pathetic, really.

  71. Makes you wonder by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Makes you wonder which sounds different cultures will produce. Will it reflect the country's stereotypes? Will popular composers be chosen? Would there be a yearly or monthly poll who's got the coolest sound? Etc...

    I wouldn't be surprised if in my fair country lucky strikes occur (sort of) which the competition attributes to too infantile or too simple a technique but which the mass kinda likes.

    I for one hope Tom Waits will produce an all American sound and the Kraftwerk will influence the German car scene. Showaddywaddy would get out of their graves for the UK. Los del Rio will inevitably produce Seat noises.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  72. on topic by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    I watched the video and thoroughly enjoyed the sound.

    I may wire up my (traditional gas engine) car to make the same sound through loudspeakers located underneath the car.

  73. Not the problem that you think by pbjones · · Score: 2

    I have a Prius (2nd hand) and with a CVT, the engine is usually running at about the same rev range, but the speed varies a lot. So I need a sound based on speed and not 'engine' RPM. (for those people who don't understand the Pruis setup, a petrol engine provides the running power a lot of the time while the electric motors take up the slack and lessen the strain. The transmission varies the gear ratio without the usual 'steps' and so the engine can be held at optimum rpm while the CVT accelerates the car)

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  74. How many kids killed by car ? by aepervius · · Score: 1

    When very young I know I was nearly killed by a car which did not see me , while it was tying to park. Luckily I DID hear it and jumped back. Now if it had been a silent car.... ?

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  75. Horse drawn carriage by Ragnar79 · · Score: 2

    I would hack it to sound like horse drawn carriage :)

  76. My pick of sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tron Light Cycle.

  77. Re:Five blind peds are killed by automobiles a yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The important thing is that no one else saw it coming.

  78. Was there a beta sound in place for those years? by mallyone · · Score: 0

    Like a speaker saying "Heeeeeeeeeeeeey Watch Your ASS!!!" repeating until you shut the car down.

  79. Potato potato by tepples · · Score: 1

    It would fall under fair use; you would be sampling only about 200ms of audio and then loop it on playback

    The third fair use factor is "amount and substantiality" (my emphasis). I'm no lawyer and unfamiliar with case law on what constitutes "substantiality" of a looped sound recording, so I don't feel ready to argue that right now. But I did remember that copyright isn't the only form of Forced Artificial Scarcity (FArtS) that applies; the sound could also be considered an unregistered trademark, just as Harley-Davidson considers the "potato potato" sound of its motorcycles its trademark.

    1. Re:Potato potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just as Harley-Davidson considers the "potato potato" sound of its motorcycles its trademark.

      Bad example, since they were wrong.

    2. Re:Potato potato by tepples · · Score: 1

      Harley lost that example because "potato potato" is a natural consequence of a real-world engine design, but the engine design in The Jetsons is entirely a work of fiction.

  80. rasberries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want my car to make a loud earth shatering continuous fart noise!

  81. Audi has sound in its name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Audis founder was named August Horch ; horch translates to :listen
    listen translates to: audi in latin
    So if anyone has an exuse for soundengeneering...

  82. Bicycle riders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should imitate engine too.
    They can go as fast as as 30-50 km/h and pedestrians may overlook some of them.

  83. 3 Things come to mind... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    1) The sound the "Flubber" car makes...
    2) The sound that other old flying Disney car made with the wings... can't make brain work right now. I'll I remember is a lot of horrible singing.
    3) A Sean Connery Voice that says "Rig for Silent Running"... :)

  84. a sound only for those in the way by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Some have demonstrated a device that can project a sound to the vicinity of someone's head that will hardly be heard elsewhere, I think the demo was up to 30 feet away, which is good for parking lots, and I bet that will be greatly improved upon. So the car remains silent except to those in the path or converging. Yes, this will take some visual sensors and processing. This IS Slashdot.

    The best part is that the "noise" can be personalized. Think of the possibilities.

  85. How cool? not very by JBaustian · · Score: 1

    I suppose the folks who make money selling ringtones will look at this as a growth market.

    But just remember -- a lot of communities have anti-noise ordinances.

    1. Re:How cool? not very by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 1

      Which is STILL a pathetic "industry," since anyone with mp3's and a copy of iTunes (or other music software) can make snippets of music.

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
  86. One Would Think but... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Fortunately evs still have tires, which are what make most of the noise in most any car at residential street or parking lot speeds.

    That's what I thought. Then I unloaded a computer out of a coworker's electric car, and was walking to the crosswalk in front of it. I was watching the car because I had heard they were quiet, but was thinking that I'd hear the tire noise, a click, or something especially since my attention was on it at the time. Nope. It just zoomed off right past me and down the street while passing within two feet of me, and I never heard a thing.

  87. As a bicyclist... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    ..I can tell you how common it is for pedestrians to step into the street without looking if they don't hear any traffic. I've had way too many close calls.So we either need smarter pedestrians or electric cars that make noise. Make mine sound like a TIE fighter, please.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  88. Electric car noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my novel Cyberchild, which came out in 2005, a character has a car-aftermarket shop where he also adds or upgrades the sound kits on electric cars. Not the focus of the book, but a part of the background. It is a good read, though: http://www.amazon.com/Cyberchild-Alix-Paultre/dp/1411626613.

  89. This was invented and patented YEARS ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A gentleman named George Carter invented and patented a technology solution for implementing the sound of any type engine to any type of wheeled vehicle.
    http://carterinventions.com/about.htm
    He invented it for his Chaparral Grand Prix cars so they would sound like F1 racing cars instead of Briggs & Stratton lawnmower engines.

  90. the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the solution to this is to turn every vehicle into an ice cream van.

  91. Jane! Get me off this thing!!! by dcigary · · Score: 1

    I had this exact same idea almost 8 years ago when my friend bought his Prius and was showing it to me.

    Although my idea was to have it sound like the Jetson's car...

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...