Yes, 3.0% unemployment is BETTER than 3.1% unemployment.
I haven't done much healing this week, but that's just because my only 'injury' was a small bruise on my elbow. There simply wasn't much healing for me to do.
There's plenty of blame to go around. The person who deserves none though is the guy who was just looking to see what all the commotions was about and probably died wondering who the police were talking to and why they were in his neighborhood.
Be shot with WHAT? A dirty look? Unarmed citizen in the open vs squad of well armed body armored cops standing behind their cars.
And he probably couldn't hear their instructions.
Keep in mind, you may be the turkey the next time a squad of cops opens fire. It's not like you have to actually be doing anything even vaguely questionable to end up in their crosshairs.
The police had cause to come to the house, they had a call for help and the caller provided an address.
Absolutely. Then they had a call to wonder why the house didn't match the description, why the call didn't actually come in on 911, why the guy at the door seems confused, etc. Too bad they failed that one. Next up, they had the number one rule of shooting, VERIFY YOUR TARGET. They get an EPIC FAIL on that one.
I don't think it's at all too much to ask that police think before they start shooting so they don't kill people minding their own business in their own homes.
Since I don't have a time machine to fix your being apparently raised by wolves, I'll just mention that they also mis-quoted the only named expert and they haven't even managed to show us a picture of an affected board (they did, however, show us utterly useless pictures of generic un-hacked boards and a harmless signal conditioner in order to leave the impression that they had presented photographic evidence).
It goes beyond that. In your suggested scenario, it would be neutral to eat a ghost. What they actually trained was that eating ghosts is bad. That is, it learns to not do that even though it would result in a higher score.
That's the point. There are plenty of real world cases where we could be more efficient if we simply disregarded moral and ethical concerns. One of the concerns with machine learning is that they may find an optimal solution that violates ethical considerations. The problem is even larger when you consider an AI finding locally optimal solutions disregarding externalities.
For a classic example, Ford once determined that paying off expected damages in wrongful death suits would be slightly cheaper than refitting existing Pintos to not explode.
The Pac-Man simulation is a very simplified version of a case where, due to ethical considerations it is necessary to avoid the locally optimal solution.
You should try the actual essential oil to decide. Perhaps lavender really isn't for you, or perhaps cheap fake lavender is just crap. I find many things that supposedly smell "just like" actual flowers smell terrible and irritating while the actual essential oil and the flowers themselves smell good to me.
The study in TFA was more in-depth and thorough. It's rare for a single study to provide all of the answers to all of the questions with complete certainty. For example, the current study looked at the mechanism for the effect rather than simply determining that an effect existed.
C) Actually pay attention to performance when developing and make it possible to turn off resource heavy new features.
D) Adopt a tiered system like Debian where Stable only gets bug fixes and perhaps backports.
Add in user replaceable batteries or at least make it easy for a moderately skilled tech to do it without crazy special tools or resorting to grey market parts.
Given the time frame, it's more like you installed SP3 on your screaming XP machine and performance went to hell.
The other half of the complaint is that they offered the users no way back. So you installed SP3 on your screaming XP machine and performance tanked. But, Surprise, there's no way to go back.
Oracle has simply overplayed their hand. For years, they have used the intrinsic difficulty of migrating as a tool to keep customers on-board in spite of constant abuse.
They finally tightened the thumb screws one turn too tight and their customers have decided that the intrinsic pain of migration is less than the pain of staying with Oracle.
You must be doing it wrong. I have literally never had python break due to versioning.
So what you're saying is that a tax cut now would be the ultimate in stupid?
Yes, 3.0% unemployment is BETTER than 3.1% unemployment.
I haven't done much healing this week, but that's just because my only 'injury' was a small bruise on my elbow. There simply wasn't much healing for me to do.
There's plenty of blame to go around. The person who deserves none though is the guy who was just looking to see what all the commotions was about and probably died wondering who the police were talking to and why they were in his neighborhood.
Says the guy who's been in thousands of gunfights (on his game console in the basement).
Be shot with WHAT? A dirty look? Unarmed citizen in the open vs squad of well armed body armored cops standing behind their cars.
And he probably couldn't hear their instructions.
Keep in mind, you may be the turkey the next time a squad of cops opens fire. It's not like you have to actually be doing anything even vaguely questionable to end up in their crosshairs.
The police had cause to come to the house, they had a call for help and the caller provided an address.
Absolutely. Then they had a call to wonder why the house didn't match the description, why the call didn't actually come in on 911, why the guy at the door seems confused, etc. Too bad they failed that one. Next up, they had the number one rule of shooting, VERIFY YOUR TARGET. They get an EPIC FAIL on that one.
I don't think it's at all too much to ask that police think before they start shooting so they don't kill people minding their own business in their own homes.
And yet Seattle is still doing better than Portland. Portland only had a larger recovery because it was worse off.
Your logic suggests that if you stub your toe, you should break your femur with a hammer so you can have a bigger recovery./
Fuzzy headed thinking like that would be really really funny except that it needlessly increases suffering in the world.
The power pills still have strategic value when you don't want to eat the ghosts.
If you're taking a loss to compete with the aftermarket, you're just inefficient since they are surely not taking a loss.
Since I don't have a time machine to fix your being apparently raised by wolves, I'll just mention that they also mis-quoted the only named expert and they haven't even managed to show us a picture of an affected board (they did, however, show us utterly useless pictures of generic un-hacked boards and a harmless signal conditioner in order to leave the impression that they had presented photographic evidence).
Do read TFA again. They did multiple runs with different emphasis on having the AI emulate the human player who avoided ghosts.
It goes beyond that. In your suggested scenario, it would be neutral to eat a ghost. What they actually trained was that eating ghosts is bad. That is, it learns to not do that even though it would result in a higher score.
That's the point. There are plenty of real world cases where we could be more efficient if we simply disregarded moral and ethical concerns. One of the concerns with machine learning is that they may find an optimal solution that violates ethical considerations. The problem is even larger when you consider an AI finding locally optimal solutions disregarding externalities.
For a classic example, Ford once determined that paying off expected damages in wrongful death suits would be slightly cheaper than refitting existing Pintos to not explode.
The Pac-Man simulation is a very simplified version of a case where, due to ethical considerations it is necessary to avoid the locally optimal solution.
Given the study in TFA and the anecdotal report from OP, perhaps she's smarter than you too.
You should try the actual essential oil to decide. Perhaps lavender really isn't for you, or perhaps cheap fake lavender is just crap. I find many things that supposedly smell "just like" actual flowers smell terrible and irritating while the actual essential oil and the flowers themselves smell good to me.
The study in TFA was more in-depth and thorough. It's rare for a single study to provide all of the answers to all of the questions with complete certainty. For example, the current study looked at the mechanism for the effect rather than simply determining that an effect existed.
RTFA! This isn't just about the smell being relaxing, the research delves into WHY the smell is relaxing.
C) Actually pay attention to performance when developing and make it possible to turn off resource heavy new features.
D) Adopt a tiered system like Debian where Stable only gets bug fixes and perhaps backports.
Add in user replaceable batteries or at least make it easy for a moderately skilled tech to do it without crazy special tools or resorting to grey market parts.
Given the time frame, it's more like you installed SP3 on your screaming XP machine and performance went to hell.
The other half of the complaint is that they offered the users no way back. So you installed SP3 on your screaming XP machine and performance tanked. But, Surprise, there's no way to go back.
The whole protest was just to clog the phone lines, not get ICE dispatched. Do try to keep up.
Make a complaint that is plausible but not actionable. "Some guy with dark skin was laughing loudly outside Home Depot, I think he might be Mexican".
Oracle has simply overplayed their hand. For years, they have used the intrinsic difficulty of migrating as a tool to keep customers on-board in spite of constant abuse.
They finally tightened the thumb screws one turn too tight and their customers have decided that the intrinsic pain of migration is less than the pain of staying with Oracle.
The point is that for a school bus, they will never not need adult supervision, so schoolbus is a poor target for automation in any case.
Could we get back to that? It was terribly silly but it was harmless.