There are several objects listed from the launch (Object A through F), so here is Object A at least.
OBJECT A
1 37826U 11054A 11273.14391030 -.00000079 00000-0 00000+0 0 34
2 37826 049.4988 295.0663 5643789 354.0088 001.4266 04.54364902 18
No, he talks about a polywell in the article, as thats what he wants to eventually fund and build. Its most definitely a Fusor. But what he built is a single grid fusor. You can tell by the electrode/plasma toward the bottom of the article. Trust me, I'm the Washington, DC fusioneer with a reactor 7 blocks from the whitehouse.
Evil empire #2 is really sticking it to the long standing telecommunications industry...and for the good of the general public at that.
Now if they could just topple Comcast, and maybe buy up some of the dark fiber around the country...then they could conquer Microsoft and maybe the People's Republic of China.
The issue with Stellarium is that it isn't all 100% real information, its generated information to be somewhat accurate. Sky in Google Earth however contains actual Digital Sky Survey data and Sloan Digital Sky Survey data. Not to mention that the Space Telescope Science Institute (the people who run Hubble) was the primary research institution that worked on the project with Google. This means that besides the ground based digital data, Hubble Space Telescope images are overlayed on the sky as well.
Google Sky is an actual real representation of the sky. People who say the project is half finished because the plates aren't stiched together properly are complete idiots, because its impossible to compose one complete image of the sky from thousands of "digital plates" and keep the data accurate. Sky in Google Earth data is 99.9999% accurate, and is only off by like half an arcsecond in some places.
Slashdot Mirror
There are several objects listed from the launch (Object A through F), so here is Object A at least.
OBJECT A
1 37826U 11054A 11273.14391030 -.00000079 00000-0 00000+0 0 34
2 37826 049.4988 295.0663 5643789 354.0088 001.4266 04.54364902 18
(from http://celestrak.com/ )
No, he talks about a polywell in the article, as thats what he wants to eventually fund and build. Its most definitely a Fusor. But what he built is a single grid fusor. You can tell by the electrode/plasma toward the bottom of the article. Trust me, I'm the Washington, DC fusioneer with a reactor 7 blocks from the whitehouse.
Quick, page a doctor who knows something about these things! Dr. Zaius, please pick up the banana phone.
In Soviet Warcraft, world own you!
Evil empire #2 is really sticking it to the long standing telecommunications industry...and for the good of the general public at that. Now if they could just topple Comcast, and maybe buy up some of the dark fiber around the country...then they could conquer Microsoft and maybe the People's Republic of China.
The issue with Stellarium is that it isn't all 100% real information, its generated information to be somewhat accurate. Sky in Google Earth however contains actual Digital Sky Survey data and Sloan Digital Sky Survey data. Not to mention that the Space Telescope Science Institute (the people who run Hubble) was the primary research institution that worked on the project with Google. This means that besides the ground based digital data, Hubble Space Telescope images are overlayed on the sky as well. Google Sky is an actual real representation of the sky. People who say the project is half finished because the plates aren't stiched together properly are complete idiots, because its impossible to compose one complete image of the sky from thousands of "digital plates" and keep the data accurate. Sky in Google Earth data is 99.9999% accurate, and is only off by like half an arcsecond in some places.
In communist china, document support you!