Don't feel to bad for Elisha. He was part owner of the Graybar Electric Company. Which today is still one of the largest suppliers of electric and voice data supplies who still today suck up large amounts of money for over priced items.
It was that money he used to try and patent the telephone.
I feel like I may be the one defending the great Satan here (Theo). But I will state a few things so no one jumps the gun to fast.
Theo doesn't really need defending. He quite capable of doing that himself.
Theo is passionate. A trait most people don't have and others can't deal with.
Theo dispute was that the issue was everyone who was cc on the inital email by Michael Buesch. The code dispute was brought up on a driver that didn't work. And the tone of the initial email was at the very least condescending.
Theo defended what he felt was an attack on one of his developers. Something Theo is rightly passionate about. Theo did not dispute the code was there. He does dispute who wrote the code. He did take personally to defending one of his developers. Good for him.
I have seen the posts in this thread by others including Bruce Perens:
Oh? So, if I take my record collection and commit it to a public CVS repository, that's going to be OK with RIAA, then?:-)
Actually if I couldn't play any of the music because the code it was written in didn't work. I don't think anyone would really say anything except your files don't work and therefore suck. I think the RIAA would have a tough time winning a prosecution just because you had a bunch of files labeled as music files. That doesn't mean the RIAA wouldn't try and you would probably not be happy about it. Theo didn't seem happy about what was being done to one of his developers.
Again the initial tone and the number of people cc in Michael's letter was the problem.
Many of you have said that Theo was upset about being caught with GPL code in his CVS. Well isn't this how other developers get to make commits and corrections to code?(I may be wrong here don't be afraid to correct me I can take it) So a driver that doesn't work and is under development has some GPL code in it. Wouldn't one of the commits be to mention there is some GPL code in the drive that may need to be dealt with? (Instead of sending a harshly worded letter and cc the world on it?)
I am not a developer but I have to admit if I were I would want be one for OpenBSD because I know that I am going to work with people who strive to do the best and have someone who has their backs.
Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has caused a great deal of FUD amongst beekeepers, farmers, and the media. So speculation is running rampant. I am receiving 20 or more media stories a day on CCD. Most of them are copies of the same story. The media is asking us and other beekeepers lots of questions. The unfortunate fact is there are not a lot of answers. The studies are taking place but everything is so preliminary right now that they are still debating the possible causes. Symptons are still being discussed.
The American Beekeeping Federation through one of it's subsideraries held a discussion in Stuart area of Florida. This is mentioned in the NY Times article. The meeting wasn't held to discuss a cure it was held to discuss the progress of the research. Unfortunatly the meeting was invitation only.
The Mid Atlantic Apiculture is heading the reasearch into CCD. The most up to date information can be found on their site.
Some notes on the reasearch. Currently it is only involving commercial beekeepers with mulitple hives. Hobbiest are not included. And since this is preliminary research there are no control groups or investigation into feral bees as to weather or not they are having this issue. The study according to Troy with the ABF does not involve different breeds of bees. So there is no seperate breakdown on how it affects Italians, russians, hygenics, buckfast, or other breeds. Please understand that Italians are by far the most common type of bee used.
Commerical beekeepers are also the main focus since this affects their livelyhood. if you have 1000 hives and loose 400 of them to CCD that is a lot of money gone. If you are a hobbiest and you lose a hive life sucks but the impact isn't the same.
Yes cgi access gives them a virtual shell, you can control how it functions.
You should be using mod_security. http://understudy.net/tutorials.php?name=wget comes back failed
You can run limited ablity shell accounts such as scponlyc (chrooted version of scponly)
If the target server is running one of the vulnerable scripts at specific URLs and is configured to permit external shell commands and remote file download in the PHP/CGI environment, a copy of the worm could be downloaded and executed.
1. don't permit external shell access through you www accounts. Make all you www accounts shell be/usr/bin/false. I realize that some people need cli access but it should be severly limited in it's functions and only used by those who have a real need.
2. don't permit php/cgi scripts that are explotiable. Okay that is a broad general statement , however there are well known malicious scripts and well known explotiable scripts. Don't allow them. And certainly don't allow them if cli access is being used.
3. do apply your security patches (after testing).
4. Host with a good website company like 34sp.com (shameless plug with who I am hosted on)
Okay under $100. It's free
It has a nice php interface.
It is very tiny in size.
And you can run it just off the CD if you want to.
It's based on FreeBSD http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/
Most Americans are unaware of how much of their information is public. You address and phone number are public information and most efforts you can try do not prevent it from being accesiable to the public. The problem is most Americans think that their information is private, it isn't. You want to start a flamewar on/. Just do a whois on someone's website and post it in a/. story. Dont believe me I did it here
The replies show how other respond to items like this. This is not about bloggers rights or whether or not they are journalists. They are about the fact that most Americans continue to revel in their ignorance about what they think is their right to privacy.
Unfortunately, everyone seems to be capable of writing bitcy slashdot posts.
:) I like that. That was good.
However, it doesn't change that the guy complaigned. He mentioned linking to his site without permission. wahh.
The page that is linked is his index.html page. Again this wasn't some hidden backdoor not linked page. It was his front page.
Also the site was registered on Jan 30th of this year. Assuming he didn't create the web page the day he registered it he still had ablity to spend more than 5 minutes on it. And if linking to it was such a problem he could have taken it down and left it blank or put up something saying that the server was being slammed and would resume once normal traffic levels had returned. I don't expect everyone to agree with me. I knew the post would not make everyone happy, and I knew it would cause a backlash. Maybe however someone will look at it and say maybe before I make this public I will think twice. Making things public isn't a bad thing. It just is requires a bit of thinking and if you don't think it is ready for the public, don't make it so.
First off I know very well that my info is out there. If I wanted it hidden I would do so. So posting my info doesn't bother me. The gentleman had a public website then bitches about people linking to it. If you don't want it out there don't make it public. I think it is great that they are being mirrored by nyud.net. I hope that helps his site stay up. Just don't sit there and whine about having a public page and having it get linked to. Which is what he did. He wants to whine about the five minutes he threw the page together in and then make sure that permission is asked before linking to it. No it doesn't make my dick feel bigger it doesn't need to. Don't put pages that aren't ready and don't complaign about pages you make avaliable to the public. So everyone may see this as a troll. It is not. It never fails to amaze me at how people make things public and then complaign when others look at them.
Someone posted this to slashdot without my approval.It is an unfinished site. Please check back later for the finished version.
This is not the orginal site. It was thrown together in 5 minutes as a demo. Please be respectful.
(caps removed due to/. lameness filter)
Gee I am so sorry that we forgot to get a note from you. Gosh, did our linking to you really get your panties in a bunch. Your server is being load tested by us, you should be grateful. If your server doesn't stand up to this you will know you need to write some different code for your server.However due to the fact that you are upset by this I will take this issue up with management right now.
Attention/. bosses please try not to link to:
Administrative Contact:
SuitCaseServers
Andrew Larson
769 Lee Hall
blacksburg, VA 24060
US
Phone: 540-232-1292
Email: Lowtekk@gmail.com
without asking him first. I hope that makes everything better.
Here is a review of of several operating systems. That are suppose to complete several functions.
However being that I actually bothered to read the article I noticed a few things that bugged me. We installed each of the Linux distributions side-by-side with Windows XP We installed Windows XP and Mac OS X without partitioning the hard drive. Both operating systems include partitioning software that deletes your existing operating system and data.
So basically they installed MacOS and WinXP on a entire hard drive and then did a dual boot setup with Linux. They mention how certain versions of Linux will partition the hard drive and certain versions won't. They however don't give the same break to Linux. Try installing Linux on it's own hard drive. Windows and Mac software are more than capable to delete the exisiting software, well hell I can do that also with Linux.
Xandros was the only Linux distribution that didn't come with a LiveCD. Windows XP and Mac OS X aren't available on LiveCDs
Yet this is the only place they mention that live cd issue. Why is it not in the bad column under the bullet points for WinXP and Mac.
Easy-to-access software updates and security patches and fixes can save you time and hassle. Mac OS X and Windows XP automatically check for new updates and patches at specific times as long as you're connected to the internet. You can change the default settings if you wish. None of the Linux distributions offer automatic updates, but you can either download patches and updates from each manufacturers' website, or by using Linspire Click-N-Run or Xandros Networks. SuSE Linux and Mandrakelinux offer to look for updates during installation.
That is so you don't just throw a patch in there and have it create more problems. I still remember WinNT sp6 and the Lotus Notes issue and several others.
Unlike Windows XP, the Linux distributions and Mac OS X also let you restrict a program, such as ICQ, to a single user account. Additionally, in Linux and Mac OS X, the administrator is the only account with access to universal settings and files.
This is a good thing remember that.
Windows XP was the only operating system that couldn't recognise and open an imported Excel file -- the included office software is very basic so you need to install Microsoft Office or another more advanced program.
Even Linux distro's require Open Office or other software to be installed to read an Excel file the difference is that you can usually install them right after you install the OS. It may be included in the box set on one of the CDs or you can download it. Either way you don't have to go out and spend more than you paid for the operating system.
The difficulties with installing new software using a linux-based operating system arise when you want to install software from elsewhere.
I won't disagree here, extracting tarballs, unpacking an RPM, trying to have apt-get install a program can be a bit of a bear. Making sure you have all your dependincies. The difference is that if something goes wrong you can at least look into it. If the.exe doesn't install properly you are pretty much screwed. Now with FreeBSD you can install your programs from the ports tree with "make install distclean" or a package from the cd or ftp sites with "pkg_add -r foo". The dependincies will get installed automatically.
I understand the joe average user need. The thing is if joe average has worked with windows before coming to linux they will find things they don't understand and are very likely to get frustrated. The same applies in reverse take a *nix user who hasn't been with windows ever or since windows 95 and throw them into that enviroment. Watch them pull out their hair. While Linux (distros), OSX, and WinXP are operating systems they are very different and trying to find similarites isn't always going to be fair. If you have only ever driven an automatic car, driving a car with a manual tr
# Empire Net (now known as My180.net)
An ISP in Bend, Oregon, uses OpenBSD on AMD, Intel, and Sun based hardware, for routing, firewalling, IPsec (VPN), bandwidth limiting, web hosting, database servers, network monitoring, intrusion detection, mail servers, backup servers, cache servers, and workstations. One of their OpenBSD routers handles traffic on between a T3 and eight fast ethernet ports, also with several 802.1Q VLANs to separate networks for co-location customers and business park tenants. An OpenBSD mail server handles e-mail storage/retrieval and RADIUS authentication for over 5,000 users. Several OpenBSD web servers each handle over 300 web sites.
The Frame Relay over ATM (FROATM) is supported and this card works with OpenBSD. From the website:
Sangoma's T1/E1 WAN cards have PCI bus interfaces and incorporate an integrated combination T1 and E1 DSU/CSU for a direct connection between the client's server and the demarc. The cards support major protocols including ATM, Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC and X.25 under all popular operating systems including Linux, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Unix and Sun Solaris.
Currently Asterik (a VOIP system)is being ported to FreeBSD and OpenBSD. I am not sure if those are complete yet or not but, that can work in coordination with your Voice over ATM (VOATM) and Voice over Frame Relay (VOFR). I realize that VOFR/VOATM is not VOIP but the system is being designed with that support in mind.
I realize this may not answer all your points but it will help.
The article is nice and well written. I would however change one step.
alias rebuild 'cd/usr/src && make update && make world && make kernel && mergemaster'
to
alias rebuild 'cd/usr/src && mergemaster -p && make update && make world && make kernel && mergemaster'
The prebuildworld mode for mergemaster is a life saver. Read man mergemaster.
I recently posted this comment on/.org. I sent in my complaints and got a response from the Attorney General's office. They basically said it was an issue under the jurisdiction of the SEC. How do I explain to them that the actions of SCO are also under their jurisdiction? I am thinking of their violating the GPL. Help me out to get a decent response to the Attorney General's office.
I orginally posted this on the "IBM Puts Pressure On SCO" article. However I posted it very late. So I will post here again. If you don't like what SCO is doing complain about it. Here is a link to help you contact the people to complain to.
http://www.understudy.net/weblog/archives/00000014.html
I orginally posted this on the "IBM Puts Pressure On SCO" article. However I posted it very late. So I will post here again. If you don't like what SCO is doing complain about it. Here is a link to help you contact the people to complain to. http://www.understudy.net/weblog/archives/00000014.html
I also live in WPB. . I say we let all those dealers on Ave D know he is a rich junkie with a male rape fantasy. Yeah I know this wrong, but so is spam.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't feel to bad for Elisha. He was part owner of the Graybar Electric Company. Which today is still one of the largest suppliers of electric and voice data supplies who still today suck up large amounts of money for over priced items. It was that money he used to try and patent the telephone.
I feel like I may be the one defending the great Satan here (Theo). But I will state a few things so no one jumps the gun to fast.
Theo doesn't really need defending. He quite capable of doing that himself. Theo is passionate. A trait most people don't have and others can't deal with. Theo dispute was that the issue was everyone who was cc on the inital email by Michael Buesch. The code dispute was brought up on a driver that didn't work. And the tone of the initial email was at the very least condescending.
Theo defended what he felt was an attack on one of his developers. Something Theo is rightly passionate about. Theo did not dispute the code was there. He does dispute who wrote the code. He did take personally to defending one of his developers. Good for him.
I have seen the posts in this thread by others including Bruce Perens: Oh? So, if I take my record collection and commit it to a public CVS repository, that's going to be OK with RIAA, then? :-)
Actually if I couldn't play any of the music because the code it was written in didn't work. I don't think anyone would really say anything except your files don't work and therefore suck. I think the RIAA would have a tough time winning a prosecution just because you had a bunch of files labeled as music files. That doesn't mean the RIAA wouldn't try and you would probably not be happy about it. Theo didn't seem happy about what was being done to one of his developers.
Again the initial tone and the number of people cc in Michael's letter was the problem.
Many of you have said that Theo was upset about being caught with GPL code in his CVS. Well isn't this how other developers get to make commits and corrections to code?(I may be wrong here don't be afraid to correct me I can take it) So a driver that doesn't work and is under development has some GPL code in it. Wouldn't one of the commits be to mention there is some GPL code in the drive that may need to be dealt with? (Instead of sending a harshly worded letter and cc the world on it?)
I am not a developer but I have to admit if I were I would want be one for OpenBSD because I know that I am going to work with people who strive to do the best and have someone who has their backs.
Notice of Full Disclosure:
I am vice president of the Palm Beach County Beekeepers.
Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has caused a great deal of FUD amongst beekeepers, farmers, and the media. So speculation is running rampant. I am receiving 20 or more media stories a day on CCD. Most of them are copies of the same story. The media is asking us and other beekeepers lots of questions. The unfortunate fact is there are not a lot of answers. The studies are taking place but everything is so preliminary right now that they are still debating the possible causes. Symptons are still being discussed.
The American Beekeeping Federation through one of it's subsideraries held a discussion in Stuart area of Florida. This is mentioned in the NY Times article. The meeting wasn't held to discuss a cure it was held to discuss the progress of the research. Unfortunatly the meeting was invitation only.
The Mid Atlantic Apiculture is heading the reasearch into CCD. The most up to date information can be found on their site.
Some notes on the reasearch. Currently it is only involving commercial beekeepers with mulitple hives. Hobbiest are not included. And since this is preliminary research there are no control groups or investigation into feral bees as to weather or not they are having this issue. The study according to Troy with the ABF does not involve different breeds of bees. So there is no seperate breakdown on how it affects Italians, russians, hygenics, buckfast, or other breeds. Please understand that Italians are by far the most common type of bee used.
Commerical beekeepers are also the main focus since this affects their livelyhood. if you have 1000 hives and loose 400 of them to CCD that is a lot of money gone. If you are a hobbiest and you lose a hive life sucks but the impact isn't the same.
Yes cgi access gives them a virtual shell, you can control how it functions.
c urity+rules _ security.html
You should be using mod_security.
http://understudy.net/tutorials.php?name=wget comes back failed You can run limited ablity shell accounts such as scponlyc (chrooted version of scponly)
And the servers I run on are all FreeBSD based.
Mod security can be found here:
http://modsecurity.org/
http://www.gotroot.com/tiki-index.php?page=mod_se
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/apache/2003/11/26/mod
If the target server is running one of the vulnerable scripts at specific URLs and is configured to permit external shell commands and remote file download in the PHP/CGI environment, a copy of the worm could be downloaded and executed.
/usr/bin/false. I realize that some people need cli access but it should be severly limited in it's functions and only used by those who have a real need.
1. don't permit external shell access through you www accounts. Make all you www accounts shell be
2. don't permit php/cgi scripts that are explotiable. Okay that is a broad general statement , however there are well known malicious scripts and well known explotiable scripts. Don't allow them. And certainly don't allow them if cli access is being used.
3. do apply your security patches (after testing).
4. Host with a good website company like 34sp.com (shameless plug with who I am hosted on)
How can this be complete without a copy of Trekkies ?
One of the early servers for Google was made from Lego blocks.s /display/0-4-Google.htm
http://www-db.stanford.edu/pub/voy/museum/picture
I wrote this a while ago but it seems applicable here.
Linux vs. FreeBSD
Okay under $100. It's free
It has a nice php interface.
It is very tiny in size.
And you can run it just off the CD if you want to.
It's based on FreeBSD
http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/
Well John Titor did it so obvisually it can be done.
Most Americans are unaware of how much of their information is public. You address and phone number are public information and most efforts you can try do not prevent it from being accesiable to the public. The problem is most Americans think that their information is private, it isn't. You want to start a flamewar on /. Just do a whois on someone's website and post it in a /. story. Dont believe me I did it here
The replies show how other respond to items like this. This is not about bloggers rights or whether or not they are journalists. They are about the fact that most Americans continue to revel in their ignorance about what they think is their right to privacy.
Unfortunately, everyone seems to be capable of writing bitcy slashdot posts.
:) I like that. That was good.
However, it doesn't change that the guy complaigned. He mentioned linking to his site without permission. wahh.
The page that is linked is his index.html page. Again this wasn't some hidden backdoor not linked page. It was his front page.
Also the site was registered on Jan 30th of this year. Assuming he didn't create the web page the day he registered it he still had ablity to spend more than 5 minutes on it. And if linking to it was such a problem he could have taken it down and left it blank or put up something saying that the server was being slammed and would resume once normal traffic levels had returned. I don't expect everyone to agree with me. I knew the post would not make everyone happy, and I knew it would cause a backlash. Maybe however someone will look at it and say maybe before I make this public I will think twice. Making things public isn't a bad thing. It just is requires a bit of thinking and if you don't think it is ready for the public, don't make it so.
First off I know very well that my info is out there. If I wanted it hidden I would do so. So posting my info doesn't bother me. The gentleman had a public website then bitches about people linking to it. If you don't want it out there don't make it public. I think it is great that they are being mirrored by nyud.net. I hope that helps his site stay up. Just don't sit there and whine about having a public page and having it get linked to. Which is what he did. He wants to whine about the five minutes he threw the page together in and then make sure that permission is asked before linking to it. No it doesn't make my dick feel bigger it doesn't need to. Don't put pages that aren't ready and don't complaign about pages you make avaliable to the public. So everyone may see this as a troll. It is not. It never fails to amaze me at how people make things public and then complaign when others look at them.
From the website:
/. lameness filter)
/. bosses please try not to link to:
SuitCaseServers.com
Someone posted this to slashdot without my approval.It is an unfinished site. Please check back later for the finished version.
This is not the orginal site. It was thrown together in 5 minutes as a demo. Please be respectful.
(caps removed due to
Gee I am so sorry that we forgot to get a note from you. Gosh, did our linking to you really get your panties in a bunch. Your server is being load tested by us, you should be grateful. If your server doesn't stand up to this you will know you need to write some different code for your server.However due to the fact that you are upset by this I will take this issue up with management right now.
Attention
Administrative Contact:
SuitCaseServers
Andrew Larson
769 Lee Hall
blacksburg, VA 24060
US
Phone: 540-232-1292
Email: Lowtekk@gmail.com
without asking him first. I hope that makes everything better.
We installed each of the Linux distributions side-by-side with Windows XP
We installed Windows XP and Mac OS X without partitioning the hard drive. Both operating systems include partitioning software that deletes your existing operating system and data.
So basically they installed MacOS and WinXP on a entire hard drive and then did a dual boot setup with Linux. They mention how certain versions of Linux will partition the hard drive and certain versions won't. They however don't give the same break to Linux. Try installing Linux on it's own hard drive. Windows and Mac software are more than capable to delete the exisiting software, well hell I can do that also with Linux.
Xandros was the only Linux distribution that didn't come with a LiveCD. Windows XP and Mac OS X aren't available on LiveCDs
Yet this is the only place they mention that live cd issue. Why is it not in the bad column under the bullet points for WinXP and Mac.
Easy-to-access software updates and security patches and fixes can save you time and hassle. Mac OS X and Windows XP automatically check for new updates and patches at specific times as long as you're connected to the internet. You can change the default settings if you wish. None of the Linux distributions offer automatic updates, but you can either download patches and updates from each manufacturers' website, or by using Linspire Click-N-Run or Xandros Networks. SuSE Linux and Mandrakelinux offer to look for updates during installation.
That is so you don't just throw a patch in there and have it create more problems. I still remember WinNT sp6 and the Lotus Notes issue and several others.
Unlike Windows XP, the Linux distributions and Mac OS X also let you restrict a program, such as ICQ, to a single user account. Additionally, in Linux and Mac OS X, the administrator is the only account with access to universal settings and files.
This is a good thing remember that.
Windows XP was the only operating system that couldn't recognise and open an imported Excel file -- the included office software is very basic so you need to install Microsoft Office or another more advanced program.
Even Linux distro's require Open Office or other software to be installed to read an Excel file the difference is that you can usually install them right after you install the OS. It may be included in the box set on one of the CDs or you can download it. Either way you don't have to go out and spend more than you paid for the operating system.
The difficulties with installing new software using a linux-based operating system arise when you want to install software from elsewhere.
I won't disagree here, extracting tarballs, unpacking an RPM, trying to have apt-get install a program can be a bit of a bear. Making sure you have all your dependincies. The difference is that if something goes wrong you can at least look into it. If the .exe doesn't install properly you are pretty much screwed. Now with FreeBSD you can install your programs from the ports tree with "make install distclean" or a package from the cd or ftp sites with "pkg_add -r foo". The dependincies will get installed automatically.
I understand the joe average user need. The thing is if joe average has worked with windows before coming to linux they will find things they don't understand and are very likely to get frustrated. The same applies in reverse take a *nix user who hasn't been with windows ever or since windows 95 and throw them into that enviroment. Watch them pull out their hair. While Linux (distros), OSX, and WinXP are operating systems they are very different and trying to find similarites isn't always going to be fair. If you have only ever driven an automatic car, driving a car with a manual tr
T1 cards are readily avaliable in PCI form
OpenBSD at work
Here is one example That uses 802.1Q VLANS.
# Empire Net (now known as My180.net)
An ISP in Bend, Oregon, uses OpenBSD on AMD, Intel, and Sun based hardware, for routing, firewalling, IPsec (VPN), bandwidth limiting, web hosting, database servers, network monitoring, intrusion detection, mail servers, backup servers, cache servers, and workstations. One of their OpenBSD routers handles traffic on between a T3 and eight fast ethernet ports, also with several 802.1Q VLANs to separate networks for co-location customers and business park tenants. An OpenBSD mail server handles e-mail storage/retrieval and RADIUS authentication for over 5,000 users. Several OpenBSD web servers each handle over 300 web sites.
The Frame Relay over ATM (FROATM) is supported and this card works with OpenBSD. From the website:
Sangoma's T1/E1 WAN cards have PCI bus interfaces and incorporate an integrated combination T1 and E1 DSU/CSU for a direct connection between the client's server and the demarc. The cards support major protocols including ATM, Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC and X.25 under all popular operating systems including Linux, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Unix and Sun Solaris.
You can look at the OpenBSD hardware list for more information.
Currently Asterik (a VOIP system)is being ported to FreeBSD and OpenBSD. I am not sure if those are complete yet or not but, that can work in coordination with your Voice over ATM (VOATM) and Voice over Frame Relay (VOFR). I realize that VOFR/VOATM is not VOIP but the system is being designed with that support in mind.
I realize this may not answer all your points but it will help.
May I recommend OpenBSD with carp as a alternative.
I am waiting for SCO to go out of buisness. Just so I can see this
Let me introduce you to Tom Lehrer
Now let's go poison some pigeons in the park.
The article is nice and well written. I would however change one step. /usr/src && make update && make world && make kernel && mergemaster' /usr/src && mergemaster -p && make update && make world && make kernel && mergemaster'
alias rebuild 'cd
to
alias rebuild 'cd
The prebuildworld mode for mergemaster is a life saver. Read man mergemaster.
I recently posted this comment on /.org. I sent in my complaints and got a response from the Attorney General's office. They basically said it was an issue under the jurisdiction of the SEC. How do I explain to them that the actions of SCO are also under their jurisdiction? I am thinking of their violating the GPL. Help me out to get a decent response to the Attorney General's office.
I orginally posted this on the "IBM Puts Pressure On SCO" article. However I posted it very late. So I will post here again. If you don't like what SCO is doing complain about it. Here is a link to help you contact the people to complain to. http://www.understudy.net/weblog/archives/00000014 .html
I orginally posted this on the "IBM Puts Pressure On SCO" article. However I posted it very late. So I will post here again. If you don't like what SCO is doing complain about it. Here is a link to help you contact the people to complain to.4 .html
http://www.understudy.net/weblog/archives/0000001
Go here http://www.understudy.net/weblog/archives/00000014 .html and let the SEC and the government officials of Utah know that what SCO is doing is illegal.
I also live in WPB. . I say we let all those dealers on Ave D know he is a rich junkie with a male rape fantasy. Yeah I know this wrong, but so is spam.