It's more like saying the "do not enter" sign on your front door does not add any security. The best part about NAT is how many firewalls require UPNP to work and listen on the WAN for UPNP. Over the years, I have seen attacks against random crappy implementations of NAT that were much worse than if they just had public IPs., like being able to make a device on the Internet look like a local private IP and other random crap.
The doubling is every year or so, not every day, and it was pretty static prior to 2011.
2009: 0.23%
2010: 0.25%
2011: 0.23%
2012: 0.41%
2013: 1.09%
2014: 2.78%
2015: 5.95%
2016: 10.07%
2017: 16.42%
2018: 21.97%
There's a for-profit unsubsidized 24/7(batteries) PV solar plant going up in the Middle East that won a bid for $0.046/kwh. In certain parts of the world, including a few locations in the USA, stable renewable is cheaper than fossil fuel.
We now have atomic clocks so precise and accurate, that they cannot keep time with each other even if they're literally touching. The gravity experienced is different even though so incredibly minutely different.
The test was less useful than the research required to do the test. Physics has been confirmed to work the same to a certain degree in many different ways. A simple example is spectra lines. If the speed of light, strength of gravity, energy levels or particles, and a slew of other things were at all different, we'd see something that does not match what we see locally. But even if a star is 40 billion light years away, it still has the same laws and constants, to within the ability of what we can measure, which is a lot.
You don't need direct Sun light. Solar panels can generate around 80% of peak during dismal overcast days. And there are batteries. They really are not that expensive. Some places are even pairing batteries with fossil fuel like coal. A recent case study showed they were able to save $35mil in fuel over a 6 month period from a $55mil battery bank. Seems to me that batteries pay for themselves.
I don't think you fully appreciate how deep the conspiracy goes. World War 2 never happened. Even my grandpa was in on this obvious lie. He claims to have been a PoW, but I know better. I can find all kinds of proof on the Internet that the Internet doesn't even exist! Wait. What are we arguing about again?
Pollution from fossil fuel is costing the USA about $100bil in healthcare per year. Externalizing costs is just another form of subsidy. That said, I'm not sure how much this applies to a discussion about electric cars where either the cars burn the fuel or the power plant burns the fuel, even if it burns cleaner by some measure and further away.
Because many apps would work just fine as a web app, except that they need access to sure information to work, like augmented reality. So what you're saying is instead of just being able to go to a webpage and accepting or denying access to these sensors, you'd rather every company to have their own app that you have to install to use? Of course you might not want to install the apps, but there are people who want/need these features and they'd rather not have to go so far as installing apps for something that may be one time use.
One example that comes to mind is if you're at a museum and they have some sort of app that uses AR to let you interact virtually with the exhibits. Do you want to download an app or just hit their web page?
A tech site was doing endurance testing many years back and they manage to write over 2 petabytes to a Samsung 840 Evo before a power outage killed the SSD. And 840s were infamous for their poor write endurance and longevity, according to their specs that is. First gen TLC and all that. I haven't seen any recent longevity tests because everyone gave up. Even the low end name brand drives pretty much only die to manufacturing defects.
Several years ago some datacenter, I think Google, wrote a blog about using consumer grade MLC SSDs with customer firmware in production. Their experience was that SSD lasted as long as spinning rust if you measured the drives in data written. It is true that the SSDs didn't last as long according to the wall clock, but that's only because they could write 100x faster. Their mentality was that if they got to choose between two drives that would die after 1PiB written, they'd choose the faster one that uses less power and is much less likely to die to other reasons.
Most speakers barely touch ultrasound. Most only hit the edge of ultrasound, that many humans can still hear. The attack also mentions integrated speaks, which are going to have a horrible frequency range. Even if they can hit ultrasound, the amount of power is going to be abysmal. Going to need that magnetic speaker close enough to cause issues via magnetism.
If human population keeps growing ~3% per year, in the next 10,000 years, every atom in the observable Universe will need to be in the body of a human. No room for planets, stars, or anything else. Even numbers so large that they represent the scale of the Universe are no match for log. Log(Universe) = small number exponential growth consumes all.
Meh. I pay $40/m to 150/150 business class fiber in the Midwest, with a $20/m intro. Free installation. For $150/m, I could get the 500/500 business plan that includes Hulu Live-tv plus a free Roku stick. No contract.
$3,000 to run fiber is crazy expensive. The general going rate is about $300-$600/house in bulk. This is why the local ISP ran fiber to every house in our town, regardless if they were a customer. Bulk rates for contracted work is much cheaper than calling them on demand.
I also love the latency of fiber. 0.014ms to my ISP's speedtest server, 6ms to Chicago. Can even upload and download 149Mb/s for hours on end without affecting my latency or loss. 149.9Mb/s of smooth UDP streaming with zero loss at 9pm, 150Mb/s show a small bit transient loss, and 150.1Mb/s shows a constant low loss. Even did a 1Gb/s 64byte UDP iperf to a remote target. Something like 84.999% loss, as expected. Even with ~85% loss, 20ms-40ms latency. Fair Queuing AQMs are the best.
MTU negotiation is pathing issue and typically only works because most routers will fragment the IPv4 packet instead of just dropping it and sending an ICMP response. IPv6 explicitly disallows fragmenting the packet and the ONLY way is for the router to drop the packet and send an ICMP response. If ICMP is blocked, it will just look like 100% packet loss for any packets above a certain MTU.
A cell that only holds 50% of its original capacity is no longer worth carrying around in a car
Electric cars with 150,000 miles still have about 90% of their rated capacity. Going to take a bit to get to 50%. Your point is spot on, but you should say something more like "80%". A car battery pack with 80% capacity can run most homes for 5 days. It's ridiculous how great these would be to just re-use.
Expensive is relative. A recent Tesla install of batteries, not even involving renewable, was used to smooth out demand, and the $55mil of batteries has saved $35mil in fuel in 6 months. Even fossil fuel power plants can benefit from batteries.
Slashdot Mirror
It's more like saying the "do not enter" sign on your front door does not add any security. The best part about NAT is how many firewalls require UPNP to work and listen on the WAN for UPNP. Over the years, I have seen attacks against random crappy implementations of NAT that were much worse than if they just had public IPs., like being able to make a device on the Internet look like a local private IP and other random crap.
The doubling is every year or so, not every day, and it was pretty static prior to 2011.
2009: 0.23%
2010: 0.25%
2011: 0.23%
2012: 0.41%
2013: 1.09%
2014: 2.78%
2015: 5.95%
2016: 10.07%
2017: 16.42%
2018: 21.97%
The problems with systemd are technically features, not bugs, because they're working as intended.
There's a for-profit unsubsidized 24/7(batteries) PV solar plant going up in the Middle East that won a bid for $0.046/kwh. In certain parts of the world, including a few locations in the USA, stable renewable is cheaper than fossil fuel.
Thanks. I like hearing the other side of the story. It's just so difficult to hear both sides.
So.. reducing necessary fuel consumption does not count because it's "only" used to stabilize the grid?
We now have atomic clocks so precise and accurate, that they cannot keep time with each other even if they're literally touching. The gravity experienced is different even though so incredibly minutely different.
The test was less useful than the research required to do the test. Physics has been confirmed to work the same to a certain degree in many different ways. A simple example is spectra lines. If the speed of light, strength of gravity, energy levels or particles, and a slew of other things were at all different, we'd see something that does not match what we see locally. But even if a star is 40 billion light years away, it still has the same laws and constants, to within the ability of what we can measure, which is a lot.
If these sterile neutrinos don't interact with anything, then how can they be massive
Depends on what the definition of "anything" is. It's a very non-scientific term.
Most of the mass of a proton comes from the attractive energy among the quarks, not from their rest mass.
You don't need direct Sun light. Solar panels can generate around 80% of peak during dismal overcast days. And there are batteries. They really are not that expensive. Some places are even pairing batteries with fossil fuel like coal. A recent case study showed they were able to save $35mil in fuel over a 6 month period from a $55mil battery bank. Seems to me that batteries pay for themselves.
I don't think you fully appreciate how deep the conspiracy goes. World War 2 never happened. Even my grandpa was in on this obvious lie. He claims to have been a PoW, but I know better. I can find all kinds of proof on the Internet that the Internet doesn't even exist! Wait. What are we arguing about again?
Pollution from fossil fuel is costing the USA about $100bil in healthcare per year. Externalizing costs is just another form of subsidy. That said, I'm not sure how much this applies to a discussion about electric cars where either the cars burn the fuel or the power plant burns the fuel, even if it burns cleaner by some measure and further away.
Just waiting for people to get ticketed for checking their speed. We need some clear definition of what "distracted" is.
Because many apps would work just fine as a web app, except that they need access to sure information to work, like augmented reality. So what you're saying is instead of just being able to go to a webpage and accepting or denying access to these sensors, you'd rather every company to have their own app that you have to install to use? Of course you might not want to install the apps, but there are people who want/need these features and they'd rather not have to go so far as installing apps for something that may be one time use.
One example that comes to mind is if you're at a museum and they have some sort of app that uses AR to let you interact virtually with the exhibits. Do you want to download an app or just hit their web page?
A tech site was doing endurance testing many years back and they manage to write over 2 petabytes to a Samsung 840 Evo before a power outage killed the SSD. And 840s were infamous for their poor write endurance and longevity, according to their specs that is. First gen TLC and all that. I haven't seen any recent longevity tests because everyone gave up. Even the low end name brand drives pretty much only die to manufacturing defects.
Several years ago some datacenter, I think Google, wrote a blog about using consumer grade MLC SSDs with customer firmware in production. Their experience was that SSD lasted as long as spinning rust if you measured the drives in data written. It is true that the SSDs didn't last as long according to the wall clock, but that's only because they could write 100x faster. Their mentality was that if they got to choose between two drives that would die after 1PiB written, they'd choose the faster one that uses less power and is much less likely to die to other reasons.
Some motherboards use pulsing LEDs instead of pulsing speakers or just a numeric LED readout.
Most speakers barely touch ultrasound. Most only hit the edge of ultrasound, that many humans can still hear. The attack also mentions integrated speaks, which are going to have a horrible frequency range. Even if they can hit ultrasound, the amount of power is going to be abysmal. Going to need that magnetic speaker close enough to cause issues via magnetism.
So if I takes 4 inches and you need 20' you need 3600 times the decibels
Don't you mean something like 35.5 more decibels? It's a 3600x difference in energy, but decibels are log based. Log 3600 = 3.55 bels
If human population keeps growing ~3% per year, in the next 10,000 years, every atom in the observable Universe will need to be in the body of a human. No room for planets, stars, or anything else. Even numbers so large that they represent the scale of the Universe are no match for log. Log(Universe) = small number exponential growth consumes all.
Meh. I pay $40/m to 150/150 business class fiber in the Midwest, with a $20/m intro. Free installation. For $150/m, I could get the 500/500 business plan that includes Hulu Live-tv plus a free Roku stick. No contract.
$3,000 to run fiber is crazy expensive. The general going rate is about $300-$600/house in bulk. This is why the local ISP ran fiber to every house in our town, regardless if they were a customer. Bulk rates for contracted work is much cheaper than calling them on demand.
I also love the latency of fiber. 0.014ms to my ISP's speedtest server, 6ms to Chicago. Can even upload and download 149Mb/s for hours on end without affecting my latency or loss. 149.9Mb/s of smooth UDP streaming with zero loss at 9pm, 150Mb/s show a small bit transient loss, and 150.1Mb/s shows a constant low loss. Even did a 1Gb/s 64byte UDP iperf to a remote target. Something like 84.999% loss, as expected. Even with ~85% loss, 20ms-40ms latency. Fair Queuing AQMs are the best.
MTU negotiation is pathing issue and typically only works because most routers will fragment the IPv4 packet instead of just dropping it and sending an ICMP response. IPv6 explicitly disallows fragmenting the packet and the ONLY way is for the router to drop the packet and send an ICMP response. If ICMP is blocked, it will just look like 100% packet loss for any packets above a certain MTU.
A cell that only holds 50% of its original capacity is no longer worth carrying around in a car
Electric cars with 150,000 miles still have about 90% of their rated capacity. Going to take a bit to get to 50%. Your point is spot on, but you should say something more like "80%". A car battery pack with 80% capacity can run most homes for 5 days. It's ridiculous how great these would be to just re-use.
Expensive is relative. A recent Tesla install of batteries, not even involving renewable, was used to smooth out demand, and the $55mil of batteries has saved $35mil in fuel in 6 months. Even fossil fuel power plants can benefit from batteries.
I need anywhere from a size 10.5 to a 13, depending on the shoe style.