No the design is a compromise. I have an Android phone now (since a few days) and I find the use of a screen keyboard horrible. Really, really horrible. I love the open model, love the apps, love the touchscreen for functions other than typing, but having to fumble to find keys is a bloody, bloody mess of a design compromise. And I will stand by that.
Funny, that. And true. I was driving in England a few weeks ago, and even the simple, solar-panel fed digital speed-warning systems read your plates. Even my (foreign) plates!
There is a distinction. Decisions regarding the sexual are oftentimes made spontaneously. Yes, even the pregnancy-part of it. A condom is a man's to carry, that's true, but it deals with the spur of the moment, not with anything that you can reconsider in a day or two. Presumably, the pill for men will take a while to wear off.
Unnecessary change is unnecessary. But it is one of the more vexing characteristics of open source projects. There are many problems with C++, but one of them is that, in general, programs benefit from simplicity. I would trust a C compiler written in C much more to generate bug-free instructions than I would trust a C compiler (or any compiler for that matter) written in C++. Not because of the 'write the compiler in the language itself'-principle but because of the closeness of C to assembler; it's easier to see where the code is going.
It's pretty stable, it's just that we're adding into the atmosphere at a screaming rate, all the carbon that was only last seen in the Jurassic period. The earth was fine then, too but yeah, it didn't look quite like today and it was a notch or two warmer.
So the question is not - will the earth (and most species) survive - the question is: will we, and in the numbers that we're used to.
Depens on what you're trying to do with it, and how long you've been involved. If, like me, you were with Java from the first days, you'll remember your anger at them completely overhauling the GUI and IO APIs, and the lack of debugging possibilities. Oh, and strictfp of course. And the format of jars, and the command-line format. Oh, and nulls as arguments to ambiguous methods. Oh, and casting of course. There's always casting.
Seriously, why do people, and then I mean slashdot nerds, think 'fast database' and then think 'mysql' ? 'MySQL-compatible' equals 'bad' in my world and, in comparison with Oracle, 'not so fast at all'.
I, for one, can live with the fact that a few adolescents think that the article on Micheal Jackson is important enough to make a fuss about. Same with GW Bush. The lemmas that are mired in controversy, are usually the ones where you know about it, and have your own opinion on.
Yeah, and the difference between a poison, a drug, and a food is concentration. Those poor cows should have just evolved quicker - I'm sure this will teach them!
You forgot about the right-wingers who rant about how the govt is in the pocket of leftwing msm, and wants to regulate the size of the carrots that you buy in the supermarket.
'China meddles extensively with their economy. While smaller businesses do enjoy a freer market than the US, big corporations are in bed with the government, reaping the benefits that come with it.'
That's the same in the US - and Europe. Big corporations either get big government contracts, or they are considered 'too big too fail'. Governments even spy for them and stuff, like Clinton did for Boeing in the '90s.
That's what building is, though. You simply have to create a broader definition of what a component is. You don't count the time it costs to create a brick when you just build a house, right ?
Theoretically that, in turn, would give the Eurozone room to say to Ireland - so, you're introuble and you want a bail-out ? How's about normalizing your tax situation first ?
If you can fold a device, such as a pad or an e-reader, around it. Without a physical access barrier (which obviously has to be attractive in other ways) - forget it.
That is all that should be said about this case. The guy cannot seem to help finding himself on the wrong side of a technological argument. Why do they keep hiring him ?
It could be a combined issue; where Apple wanted to integrate those features into GCC, but then keep them for themselves (lest not to supply any 'competition' with it). Given the fact that it would be a large effort, not so strange.
THAT is what you have against GSM?! Wow. And here I thought on this website we would soon venture into a discussion about its now broken crypto. But no, speaker noise. Wow.
Slashdot Mirror
No the design is a compromise. I have an Android phone now (since a few days) and I find the use of a screen keyboard horrible. Really, really horrible. I love the open model, love the apps, love the touchscreen for functions other than typing, but having to fumble to find keys is a bloody, bloody mess of a design compromise. And I will stand by that.
Funny, that. And true. I was driving in England a few weeks ago, and even the simple, solar-panel fed digital speed-warning systems read your plates. Even my (foreign) plates!
And every convention stand has prior art.
There is a distinction. Decisions regarding the sexual are oftentimes made spontaneously. Yes, even the pregnancy-part of it. A condom is a man's to carry, that's true, but it deals with the spur of the moment, not with anything that you can reconsider in a day or two. Presumably, the pill for men will take a while to wear off.
I bet you fantasize about both.
Unnecessary change is unnecessary. But it is one of the more vexing characteristics of open source projects. There are many problems with C++, but one of them is that, in general, programs benefit from simplicity. I would trust a C compiler written in C much more to generate bug-free instructions than I would trust a C compiler (or any compiler for that matter) written in C++. Not because of the 'write the compiler in the language itself'-principle but because of the closeness of C to assembler; it's easier to see where the code is going.
Oh well, it was good while it lasted, I suppose.
It's pretty stable, it's just that we're adding into the atmosphere at a screaming rate, all the carbon that was only last seen in the Jurassic period. The earth was fine then, too but yeah, it didn't look quite like today and it was a notch or two warmer.
So the question is not - will the earth (and most species) survive - the question is: will we, and in the numbers that we're used to.
The guy gets his home raided by SS-goons, sicced on him by Apple, and his first inclination is: Yay, let's go buy another Apple product!
Depens on what you're trying to do with it, and how long you've been involved. If, like me, you were with Java from the first days, you'll remember your anger at them completely overhauling the GUI and IO APIs, and the lack of debugging possibilities. Oh, and strictfp of course. And the format of jars, and the command-line format. Oh, and nulls as arguments to ambiguous methods. Oh, and casting of course. There's always casting.
You're using a strawman.
Seriously, why do people, and then I mean slashdot nerds, think 'fast database' and then think 'mysql' ? 'MySQL-compatible' equals 'bad' in my world and, in comparison with Oracle, 'not so fast at all'.
I, for one, can live with the fact that a few adolescents think that the article on Micheal Jackson is important enough to make a fuss about. Same with GW Bush. The lemmas that are mired in controversy, are usually the ones where you know about it, and have your own opinion on.
Yeah, and the difference between a poison, a drug, and a food is concentration. Those poor cows should have just evolved quicker - I'm sure this will teach them!
You forgot about the right-wingers who rant about how the govt is in the pocket of leftwing msm, and wants to regulate the size of the carrots that you buy in the supermarket.
'China meddles extensively with their economy. While smaller businesses do enjoy a freer market than the US, big corporations are in bed with the government, reaping the benefits that come with it.'
That's the same in the US - and Europe. Big corporations either get big government contracts, or they are considered 'too big too fail'. Governments even spy for them and stuff, like Clinton did for Boeing in the '90s.
That's what building is, though. You simply have to create a broader definition of what a component is. You don't count the time it costs to create a brick when you just build a house, right ?
What about Venus ? I thought it rained on Venus, hot sulphuric acid, but still..
Theoretically that, in turn, would give the Eurozone room to say to Ireland - so, you're introuble and you want a bail-out ? How's about normalizing your tax situation first ?
Yeah because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties - you want them on that wall.
If you can fold a device, such as a pad or an e-reader, around it. Without a physical access barrier (which obviously has to be attractive in other ways) - forget it.
where 80 percent (number pulled entirely out my arse, btw) of freeways is used for getaway-drives, he would be right, yes.
That is all that should be said about this case. The guy cannot seem to help finding himself on the wrong side of a technological argument. Why do they keep hiring him ?
Huh ?
1) But it's not.
2) Intel's is, and it's one of the best ones around.
It could be a combined issue; where Apple wanted to integrate those features into GCC, but then keep them for themselves (lest not to supply any 'competition' with it). Given the fact that it would be a large effort, not so strange.
THAT is what you have against GSM?! Wow. And here I thought on this website we would soon venture into a discussion about its now broken crypto. But no, speaker noise. Wow.