Who cares about Google? I'm more worried about Uber getting rewarded for ripping them off. If Uber stole shit from Google or cheated on their research by betraying Google's trust, then the last thing I want is for Uber to get rewarded for it.
All this proves is that the insurance lobby has a deathgrip on politics.
Kowtowing to it is not the right answer. What the US needs to do is break up the cartel and introduce some competition. Insurance companies make obscene profits.
That only works if the people collecting the savings spread their wealth around and allow us blue collar stiffs to actually take a break without leaving food off our table.
The LoC gatekeeping thing is just cannon fodder to placate the masses so that exceptions to the DMCA get temporarily lifted for three years. There is no intention to do anything other than feed the sheep a temporary respite while the vast majority of things keep going indefinitely.
Use good AI to optimize efficiency, but detect human drivers and give them a wider margin of safety.
As far as the morals of saving pedestrians vs passengers or drivers, lets not forget the bittorrent protocol.
Game theory, and real life itself, deal with cooperation vs defection, and any car that selflessly seppukus their own to spare a greater number is going to get taken advantage of by less scrupulous algorithms.
Anyone trying to program an AI on how to handle a car accident should not forget this.
Slashdot Mirror
So basically it *blocks out* the bad stuff?
GP post was a joke, you insensitive clod!
Add to this the convenient loophole that the defendant "has the keys to his own cell" and thusly that protections of due process don't apply.
I am altering the deal. Pray I do not alter it any further.
Who cares about Google? I'm more worried about Uber getting rewarded for ripping them off. If Uber stole shit from Google or cheated on their research by betraying Google's trust, then the last thing I want is for Uber to get rewarded for it.
If his "His supervisor was fine with it", then why the hell did HR get involved in the first place?
Something fishy is going on and I'm calling shenanigans.
I think the issue is that the only reason she did NOT go to trial is BECAUSE of political shenanigans.
Will there be any drivers or software updates for this or will they just be... ...*shades*... ...vaporware?
Well I've heard of driving people crazy but this is ridiculous.
Simple.
If you jailbreak your device, you take responsibility for security.
Heck, I think that's one reason that the FCC hates jailbreaks, because it causes the product to be altered and lose its certification.
Quarantine.
Your computer gets caught sending spam, you get quarantined, no questions asked.
All this proves is that the insurance lobby has a deathgrip on politics.
Kowtowing to it is not the right answer. What the US needs to do is break up the cartel and introduce some competition. Insurance companies make obscene profits.
You can, however, copyright the patent.
But once the USPTO publishes it, it probably becomes a government work in the public domain.
Especially because in most cases, settlement agreements require you to forfeit your appeal rights.
Not to mention that oracle deliberately hid discussions left behind by sun pre-acquisition that granted google permission.
Reminds me of "Chaos Monkey" from the netflix simian army.
That only works if the people collecting the savings spread their wealth around and allow us blue collar stiffs to actually take a break without leaving food off our table.
(taxi and airline lobbies drops even BIGGER bags of money)
Sky Uber is still illegal!
Hell, one time I got an ass chewing from my doctor for not having *enough* salt in my blood.
They'll probably claim national security or some other bullshit.
The LoC gatekeeping thing is just cannon fodder to placate the masses so that exceptions to the DMCA get temporarily lifted for three years. There is no intention to do anything other than feed the sheep a temporary respite while the vast majority of things keep going indefinitely.
If the employee is geniunely the problem he deserves to be fired.
Use good AI to optimize efficiency, but detect human drivers and give them a wider margin of safety.
As far as the morals of saving pedestrians vs passengers or drivers, lets not forget the bittorrent protocol.
Game theory, and real life itself, deal with cooperation vs defection, and any car that selflessly seppukus their own to spare a greater number is going to get taken advantage of by less scrupulous algorithms.
Anyone trying to program an AI on how to handle a car accident should not forget this.
correct horse battery staple
You mean parabolic bullshit.