Foods prepared this way are at their best for one year though are still good for longer.
Generally speaking, as long as the jar is still sealed the food texture and flavor will degrade long before it starts to lose much nutritional value. Everything that was in the jar at the time it was sealed is still there when you open it.
That said I like eating food that tastes good, so it's good to use FIFO when consuming. My pork canned in 2011 is still tasty today though.
Say what? No preservatives in anything I've canned.
Step 1: Buy pork Step 2: Cut pork into smaller pieces Step 3: Pack pork in canning jar Step 4: Put lid on Step 5: Process through pressure canner (~1.5 hours) Step 6: Put on shelf for up to 5-10 years Step 7: Serve and enjoy!
Pressure canning is one of the easiest things I've ever done.
The underlying assumption of this, and of "tech employee representation" being that any given subgroup retains all the demographics and characteristics of the larger group and any deviation from that is an anomaly.
Get back to me when there is outrage that men are only 10% of the population in teaching and nursing careers. Why aren't we channeling funding to make teaching and nursing careers appealing to male students? Oh, because male students get to choose careers while minorities and female students are weak and unable to pursue the repressed interests that statistics say they must secretly harbor.
Also, I saw this news story. Maybe the local paper is in the bag for TWC, AT&T, and the other competitors (GASP! In the telecom industry?) but they certainly make some seemingly fact-based points that are more solid than the usual misdirection.
1% of all property taxes going to subsidize internet service for a handful (3,000 accounts) of businesses and residents seems like a lot. Salisbury is not a booming metropolis, that's a lot of people who probably can't even afford a $45 a month internet package paying higher taxes and utility rates to keep those prices down. Meanwhile they are paying $15/mo for a 2Mb connection with Time Warner Cable because their local government can't offer them anything less than that $45 package.
In 2014 they generated $4.8 million in revenue and after expenses had $229,000 to show for it. Add in depreciation (a substantial expense for a capital intensive company), amortization, interest, and other expenses and they were taxpayer funded to the tune of $144,110. That's almost 1% of all property tax revenues.
It will be interesting to see if they can be profitable as their services scale past 3,000 customers and service more of their 33,000 residents and even more businesses.
That's because economics is a blend of math and psychology. The math assumes a rational actor with all the necessary information. The psychology is rarely rational and involved decision making influenced by the decisions of others, highly varied interpretations of historical events which preclude deterministic mechanisms, and imperfect information viewed through personal biases and strengths. Inaccuracy results from improperly weighting the relative value of these two in economic outcomes and from difficulty in modeling the psychological elements. Bad math is the least of the challenges facing economics.
Same pattern happens in reverse -- take Illinois voting returns, for example. Rural precincts with fewer voters compile and report their results quickly, so Illinois goes deep red. Then Cook County (Chicago), which represents 1,635 of Illinois' 57,915 square miles, or about 2.8%) reports and the state goes blue.
Using 2012 as an example, Cook County contributed 1.94 million votes to a 5.1 million total. So 2.8% of the land area represented 40% of the results that decided 100% of the electoral votes of the state. I'm pretty sure the 97.2% of Illinois that works that land to feed the remaining 2.8% feels pretty crappy about that imbalance.
Don't bother learning a specific language, instead invest time in understanding basic principles of software structure and design. Understand object oriented principles, data structures, algorithms, and the basic concept that various blocks of the software work through interfaces. Focus on a higher level of abstraction than the specifics of a given language and he'll understand enough to say "and then this section of code needs to pass this information on to the next section of code which does this stuff with it, then passes the result to this next stage."
Which is exactly what I'm saying -- information from outside the government comes in, and from the point of that transfer it is classified and must be so marked before it leaves the possession of the case officer. The source of the information and the fact that it is known to the government are fixed at the time of transfer, and those are the details that must be protected. The marking is an administrative formality that doesn't change the sensitivity of the data.
That's bullshit too. Do you think a case officer's notes of a meeting with an agent aren't classified just because the case officer doesn't carry around a big red "CLASSIFIED" stamp? Information is classified based on the information and source, not the markings. Classified information not so marked isn't unclassified information, it's misidentified information and anyone with a security classification is trained to recognize and address that issue.
I'll also add that if she didn't follow security procedures in evaluating and applying proper classifications to materials she interacted with, then she is still guilty of mishandling classified information. Information is classified even before being so marked by appropriate authority (including the Secretary of State). Information derived from classified information (such as a summary sent to the SoS by a staffer) is also classified regardless of whether it is so marked. To think otherwise is lunacy.
If Clinton did not have contact with classified information during her tenure than she wasn't doing her job. Wasting federal funds. If she had every classified email printed out to read then she was wasting federal funds. There's no good way this can be spun and these actions from an Obama-directed justice department are just the bare minimum they can bring themselves to do against Clinton in this situation -- believe me, if there was any way they could find to drop it, they would do so.
How about you make it ham radio -- use FCC regulations to prohibit the piloting of radio controlled aircraft on anything other than available ham bands. There are already transmitters and receivers used for exactly that purpose on the 70cm band, and FCC regulations require the remote station to be identified and to carry the callsign of the operator in the signal (usually via on-screen-display video signal).
So license information is required to be both on the drone itself and trackable via signal. No need to register the drone any more than you register a radio, it just needs to be operated by a licensed operator.
Don't get me wrong -- I shoot XTC high power, CMP, IDPA, etc. I'm pretty familiar both with the types of gun owners found in a club environment and those that just saunter up to the counter at Cabella's hoping the clerk can give them good advice. I'm pretty sure there are far more gun owners in category B than in category A. I like to hang out with the category A folks but I'm not fooling myself that they represent the majority compared those who buy a shotgun because "I won't have to aim much if I need to use it" while shooting it down a 4yd hallway (2-4" pattern) and never shoot it, or who keep a 28" over-under loaded with birdshot when it's not out taking ducks.
You are implying that a neighbor dumb enough to try to shoot down an RC aircraft with their shotgun is smart enough to have carefully considered what load to use rather than whatever they have in it for home defense.
I think I'd have less problem with drones flying overhead than I would with my family being pelted by buckshot from my neighbors thinking they have the right to shoot things out of the sky.
Would you feel the same way if Google decided to block links to websites that might be viewed as offensive? I mean, even real ones like stormfront, the new black panthers, etc. How about if they prevented google fiber customers from accessing those websites? Still good?
Ok, so "Confederate Flag" brings zero results but "Nazi Uniform" pulls up exactly that. And that's OK. I don't want retailers being the morality police and more than I want my ISP to block content it doesn't agree with.
If I want a small Confederate Flag for a historical display, or a re-enactment, or other event these retails think I shouldn't be able to get it? That's crap.
I work in performance management and often we do a successes/opportunities calculation. Often when there are zero opportunities, that is a good thing ("Number of server crashes resolved without user impact"). We do not want 0/0 to evaluate to a 0% success rate, that should default to a 100% success rate because there were no failures to unsuccessfully respond to.
A quadcopter can fly a route that is preprogrammed for each type of airframe. As long as it is able to index off a defined point for each aircraft, it should be able to fly to each key inspection area and take exactly the same photo from exactly the same angle every time. Those photos can then be processed by computer to compare differences between thousands of nearly identical samples to determine a variance metric, which can help a human worker prioritize the images for review and referral to a ground inspector. Otherwise the computer inspector is going to be looking at lots of nearly identical pictures so any difference should stand out like a sore thumb.
Yet the individual arrested now has a record, misses work, possibly loses their job, and if prosecuted by the DA, has the expense of defending himself against the charges. All without recourse.
Every new teaching tool that comes along is used as an excuse by many parents and other adults to spend less time engaged with children. The advent of television and educational programming has allowed at least two generations of parents to feel better about letting their television raise their kids.
The changing expectations of the scope of responsibility public schools have in raising children has allowed parents to disengage, believing that it's someone else's job to talk to their kids, to counsel them, to provide good examples.
Now we have the false premise that better access to technology is going to solve the same problems that haven't been solved by all the other parental surrogates that haven't worked before.
Meanwhile, kids who have more accessible and better engaged parents continue to do better in school despite the best efforts of less available and disengaged parents to fill that gap with money, objects and government.
Slashdot Mirror
Foods prepared this way are at their best for one year though are still good for longer.
Generally speaking, as long as the jar is still sealed the food texture and flavor will degrade long before it starts to lose much nutritional value. Everything that was in the jar at the time it was sealed is still there when you open it.
That said I like eating food that tastes good, so it's good to use FIFO when consuming. My pork canned in 2011 is still tasty today though.
Canning = Preservatives
Say what? No preservatives in anything I've canned.
Step 1: Buy pork
Step 2: Cut pork into smaller pieces
Step 3: Pack pork in canning jar
Step 4: Put lid on
Step 5: Process through pressure canner (~1.5 hours)
Step 6: Put on shelf for up to 5-10 years
Step 7: Serve and enjoy!
Pressure canning is one of the easiest things I've ever done.
The underlying assumption of this, and of "tech employee representation" being that any given subgroup retains all the demographics and characteristics of the larger group and any deviation from that is an anomaly.
Get back to me when there is outrage that men are only 10% of the population in teaching and nursing careers. Why aren't we channeling funding to make teaching and nursing careers appealing to male students? Oh, because male students get to choose careers while minorities and female students are weak and unable to pursue the repressed interests that statistics say they must secretly harbor.
Also, I saw this news story. Maybe the local paper is in the bag for TWC, AT&T, and the other competitors (GASP! In the telecom industry?) but they certainly make some seemingly fact-based points that are more solid than the usual misdirection.
http://rowanfreepress.com/2014/08/14/why-fibrant-will-continue-to-fail-and-fail-badly-why-salisbury-needs-to-find-a-way-to-unload-fibrant-to-survive/
1% of all property taxes going to subsidize internet service for a handful (3,000 accounts) of businesses and residents seems like a lot. Salisbury is not a booming metropolis, that's a lot of people who probably can't even afford a $45 a month internet package paying higher taxes and utility rates to keep those prices down. Meanwhile they are paying $15/mo for a 2Mb connection with Time Warner Cable because their local government can't offer them anything less than that $45 package.
BTW, Source is the 2014 budget audit.
http://www.salisburync.gov/Departments/FinancialServices/finance/Pages/default.aspx
In 2014 they generated $4.8 million in revenue and after expenses had $229,000 to show for it. Add in depreciation (a substantial expense for a capital intensive company), amortization, interest, and other expenses and they were taxpayer funded to the tune of $144,110. That's almost 1% of all property tax revenues.
It will be interesting to see if they can be profitable as their services scale past 3,000 customers and service more of their 33,000 residents and even more businesses.
That's because economics is a blend of math and psychology. The math assumes a rational actor with all the necessary information. The psychology is rarely rational and involved decision making influenced by the decisions of others, highly varied interpretations of historical events which preclude deterministic mechanisms, and imperfect information viewed through personal biases and strengths. Inaccuracy results from improperly weighting the relative value of these two in economic outcomes and from difficulty in modeling the psychological elements. Bad math is the least of the challenges facing economics.
Same pattern happens in reverse -- take Illinois voting returns, for example. Rural precincts with fewer voters compile and report their results quickly, so Illinois goes deep red. Then Cook County (Chicago), which represents 1,635 of Illinois' 57,915 square miles, or about 2.8%) reports and the state goes blue.
Using 2012 as an example, Cook County contributed 1.94 million votes to a 5.1 million total. So 2.8% of the land area represented 40% of the results that decided 100% of the electoral votes of the state. I'm pretty sure the 97.2% of Illinois that works that land to feed the remaining 2.8% feels pretty crappy about that imbalance.
Don't bother learning a specific language, instead invest time in understanding basic principles of software structure and design. Understand object oriented principles, data structures, algorithms, and the basic concept that various blocks of the software work through interfaces. Focus on a higher level of abstraction than the specifics of a given language and he'll understand enough to say "and then this section of code needs to pass this information on to the next section of code which does this stuff with it, then passes the result to this next stage."
Who else would Dice hire to seed the comments with the same inanity they've put in the newsfeed?
Which is exactly what I'm saying -- information from outside the government comes in, and from the point of that transfer it is classified and must be so marked before it leaves the possession of the case officer. The source of the information and the fact that it is known to the government are fixed at the time of transfer, and those are the details that must be protected. The marking is an administrative formality that doesn't change the sensitivity of the data.
That's bullshit too. Do you think a case officer's notes of a meeting with an agent aren't classified just because the case officer doesn't carry around a big red "CLASSIFIED" stamp? Information is classified based on the information and source, not the markings. Classified information not so marked isn't unclassified information, it's misidentified information and anyone with a security classification is trained to recognize and address that issue.
I'll also add that if she didn't follow security procedures in evaluating and applying proper classifications to materials she interacted with, then she is still guilty of mishandling classified information. Information is classified even before being so marked by appropriate authority (including the Secretary of State). Information derived from classified information (such as a summary sent to the SoS by a staffer) is also classified regardless of whether it is so marked. To think otherwise is lunacy.
If Clinton did not have contact with classified information during her tenure than she wasn't doing her job. Wasting federal funds. If she had every classified email printed out to read then she was wasting federal funds. There's no good way this can be spun and these actions from an Obama-directed justice department are just the bare minimum they can bring themselves to do against Clinton in this situation -- believe me, if there was any way they could find to drop it, they would do so.
How about you make it ham radio -- use FCC regulations to prohibit the piloting of radio controlled aircraft on anything other than available ham bands. There are already transmitters and receivers used for exactly that purpose on the 70cm band, and FCC regulations require the remote station to be identified and to carry the callsign of the operator in the signal (usually via on-screen-display video signal).
So license information is required to be both on the drone itself and trackable via signal. No need to register the drone any more than you register a radio, it just needs to be operated by a licensed operator.
Don't get me wrong -- I shoot XTC high power, CMP, IDPA, etc. I'm pretty familiar both with the types of gun owners found in a club environment and those that just saunter up to the counter at Cabella's hoping the clerk can give them good advice. I'm pretty sure there are far more gun owners in category B than in category A. I like to hang out with the category A folks but I'm not fooling myself that they represent the majority compared those who buy a shotgun because "I won't have to aim much if I need to use it" while shooting it down a 4yd hallway (2-4" pattern) and never shoot it, or who keep a 28" over-under loaded with birdshot when it's not out taking ducks.
You are implying that a neighbor dumb enough to try to shoot down an RC aircraft with their shotgun is smart enough to have carefully considered what load to use rather than whatever they have in it for home defense.
I think I'd have less problem with drones flying overhead than I would with my family being pelted by buckshot from my neighbors thinking they have the right to shoot things out of the sky.
Would you feel the same way if Google decided to block links to websites that might be viewed as offensive? I mean, even real ones like stormfront, the new black panthers, etc. How about if they prevented google fiber customers from accessing those websites? Still good?
Ok, so "Confederate Flag" brings zero results but "Nazi Uniform" pulls up exactly that. And that's OK. I don't want retailers being the morality police and more than I want my ISP to block content it doesn't agree with.
If I want a small Confederate Flag for a historical display, or a re-enactment, or other event these retails think I shouldn't be able to get it? That's crap.
I work in performance management and often we do a successes/opportunities calculation. Often when there are zero opportunities, that is a good thing ("Number of server crashes resolved without user impact"). We do not want 0/0 to evaluate to a 0% success rate, that should default to a 100% success rate because there were no failures to unsuccessfully respond to.
A quadcopter can fly a route that is preprogrammed for each type of airframe. As long as it is able to index off a defined point for each aircraft, it should be able to fly to each key inspection area and take exactly the same photo from exactly the same angle every time. Those photos can then be processed by computer to compare differences between thousands of nearly identical samples to determine a variance metric, which can help a human worker prioritize the images for review and referral to a ground inspector. Otherwise the computer inspector is going to be looking at lots of nearly identical pictures so any difference should stand out like a sore thumb.
Those charges make no sense.
Yet the individual arrested now has a record, misses work, possibly loses their job, and if prosecuted by the DA, has the expense of defending himself against the charges. All without recourse.
Every new teaching tool that comes along is used as an excuse by many parents and other adults to spend less time engaged with children. The advent of television and educational programming has allowed at least two generations of parents to feel better about letting their television raise their kids.
The changing expectations of the scope of responsibility public schools have in raising children has allowed parents to disengage, believing that it's someone else's job to talk to their kids, to counsel them, to provide good examples.
Now we have the false premise that better access to technology is going to solve the same problems that haven't been solved by all the other parental surrogates that haven't worked before.
Meanwhile, kids who have more accessible and better engaged parents continue to do better in school despite the best efforts of less available and disengaged parents to fill that gap with money, objects and government.