Slashdot Mirror


User: hawk

hawk's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,422
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,422

  1. Re:Overreaction on ReplayTV 4500: No Hacking, or Else · · Score: 2
    I don't know of any state other than Nevada that could be fairly described as "catching up" with Delaware--and Nevada has gone far belong catching up, and has left Delaware behind.


    No, we don't have Chancery courts, but our regular system functions well enough that this isn't a problem . . .


    hawk

  2. instant replay on AOpen Debuts The Funniest Motherboard Ever · · Score: 2
    ABC originally pulled off INstant Replay by using computer hard drives as analog devices . . . I forget how much time they held (not a lot!), but it was pretty much just an analog recording on the disk surface, allowing them to instantly go back a few seconds . . .


    hawk

  3. Re:audiophiles rejoice! on AOpen Debuts The Funniest Motherboard Ever · · Score: 2
    yes, they were much more interesting then, and you could build something from scratch that would keep up with anything commercial. And clever design still counted for a lot . . .


    Anyway, it goes back farther than that. Somewhere in my stuff is an entire LP full of morse code at various speeds for learing it . . . something I never got around to doing, and don't have time for now . . .


    hawk

  4. tube testers and Wire recorders on AOpen Debuts The Funniest Motherboard Ever · · Score: 2
    >know anyone who wants a professional tube tester?


    Me, but I already have one :)


    Know anyone who knows how to fix a wire recorder?


    This thing uses a five or ten pound "cassette" to hold the wire spool it uses for audio recording. I even have a second (but broken) cassette for it.


    hawk

  5. why should she? on Sun Discovers Dumb Terminals · · Score: 2
    unless she gets there early enough to get the money collection job tomorrow, she doesn't get the benefit of the fertilizer.


    hawk, refraining from pointing out that there is no such job, and that that's just some lady who wandered in and takies advantage of gullible tourists :)

  6. Re:Overreaction on ReplayTV 4500: No Hacking, or Else · · Score: 2
    Oh, yes. that's why you "have to" go for the meeting--even though you don't have to :)


    hawk

  7. Re:Is this what they call BBC English? on Germany, IBM Sign Major Linux Deal · · Score: 1
    >Computers are not people. They are not "he" nor "she". They are "it".


    No, definitely not people. "demonic beings from the planes of Hell" is more like it.


    I don't know about "it," though--Damien, my old SE/30, picked up that name after the monitor suddenly spun 720 degrees in its mount. "It" just doesn't seem right, even thugh demons don't have gender (at least as we normally understand it) . . .


    hawk

  8. Re:Overreaction on ReplayTV 4500: No Hacking, or Else · · Score: 2
    >Had to go to Vegas once a year for the annual meeting


    For a very loose definition of "had to" :)


    I usually made sure that the bylaws allowed (but didn't require) phone meetings--I could sit in my Nevada office on a conference call and put words into my clients's mouths to conduct the meeting . . .


    hawk, esq.

  9. Re:Overreaction on ReplayTV 4500: No Hacking, or Else · · Score: 2
    >Companies incorporate in Delaware because the
    >corporation law there is very favorable and the
    >chancery courts (courts that deal with corporate >matters) are knowledgable and relatively speedy.


    Also, because they don't know that Nevada's law is even more friendly to corporations (or at least to the directors :), while eliminating the corporate tax entirely (OK, you pay a few bucks each year to file your list of 3 officers and director(s).


    hawk, esq.

  10. Re:And this is bad because....? on Where UnitedLinux Got It Wrong · · Score: 2
    >The article only states (and indeed bitches) that their will be no FREE binaries,


    Such a pity that the GPL stops anyone else from making and distributing those binaries frome the same source and scripts . . .


    hawk

  11. Re:why i love my mac on Win32/Linux Cross-Platform Virus · · Score: 2
    >It doesn't really exist.


    correct. Linux is just another microsoft astroturf campaign in an effort to convince the DoJ that there's competition out there :)


    hawk

  12. wimp! on Win32/Linux Cross-Platform Virus · · Score: 2
    My Tandy 102 has been virus free for 25 years, and my 1802 even longer than that . . .


    hawk, shuddering at the notion of an 1802 compatible virus . . .

  13. boxen & vaxen on Win32/Linux Cross-Platform Virus · · Score: 2
    You're *way* behind :) The average slashdot reader has been born in the meantime . . .


    I forget when the Vax rolled around, sometime in the early 80's. They got called "vaxen", and it spread at some point to boxen in general . . .


    hawk

  14. Re:One more reason... on Win32/Linux Cross-Platform Virus · · Score: 2
    >There is no reason to have binaries in one's home directory,


    Good heavens, then where am I supposed to put the models I write? Running these is *why* I have fast systems . . .


    hawk

  15. six??? on 1394 Trade Association Adopts FireWire Brand · · Score: 2
    How in the world do you use six slots these days???


    It used to be doable, but pricy, but on today's systems?


    hawk

  16. Re:Naive to think Apple will get credit on 1394 Trade Association Adopts FireWire Brand · · Score: 2
    >Xerox had a workng prototype of the GUI before Apple paid them a visit.


    And Raskin proposed GUI's long before that.


    On top of that, Apple had mockups of the Lisa interface long before the PARC visit. see Inventing the Lisa Interface


    That apple got the idea from xerox is simply folklore.


    hawk

  17. Re:No Noise?? on Shuttle SS40G Mini-PC · · Score: 2
    Hey, apple owners have been doing it for years . . .


    Gee, and doesn't that stovepipe sound similar to "heat chimney" (or whatever apple called it?)


    Now, if this thing had nine drive bays and a 500W power supply, it might make a difference to me :)


    hawk

  18. what accident? on Gotcha! DNS Popup Scammer Fined $1.9 Million · · Score: 2
    Where in calling another kid over to see it and going back forward do you find an accident?


    hawk

  19. I don't get it on Debian And WineX · · Score: 2
    This isn't a troll; this is serious.


    Why bother? It seems kind of odd to create another distribution whose purpose is to mimic the bsd's. Why not just use one?


    hawk

  20. Re:That's Slashdot... on Linux Vendors to Standardize on Single Distribution · · Score: 3, Offtopic
    >Slashdot and eWEEK are insider sites, information
    >that is published here is not really published in
    >the general / popular media sense.


    Once upon a time that was true.


    As of a couple of years ago, it's rare to find technical announcements on slashdot that were not in that morning or the prior day's Wall Street Journal.


    Of course, here in my exile, the WSJ doesn't usually make it until the afternoon, so I can't tell you if this one is in it today or not . . .


    hawk

  21. Re:Hypocritcal.... on CDs Want To Be Free · · Score: 2
    >And who pays 50 bucks for a computer game? I wait
    >2 years and let the price drop to 10-15 bucks.


    Good heavens, why the rush?


    I still haven't gotten to all the ones I found in a dollar store that had gone there to die--$1 for jewelboxes, $2 for packages--and then I bought a few more for $4 to $5 . . .


    Of course, I need to find a set of win3.1 and dos 6 install disks, as the installation cd has flipped some bits, and some don't run under dark side 98 (no sound in Master of Orion!).


    Shoot, I'm old enough to remember when you had to get software to slow your clock speed
    down when playing the older games.


    Are you *trying* to make me feel old??? :)


    If you need to lower your clock speed, you solder in a slower crystal . . . or put in a socket for your crystals . . .


    hawk

  22. Re:your math is wrong (basic infinite math) on Techies and Trekkies Unite! · · Score: 2
    I remember that drive . . . but it's been, ummm, well, let's not go there :)


    I'm surprised I didn't catch the math error given when I read it :)


    hawk

  23. your math is wrong (basic infinite math) on Techies and Trekkies Unite! · · Score: 2
    >I'm afraid the previously-finite odds will be 2
    >to the power of Infinity minus one, an irrational number


    No. Aleph(0) is the infinity of the integers. Aleph(1) is the infinity of the continuum.


    Aleph(i)=2**Aleph(i-1)
    Aleph(i)+Aleph(j)=Aleph( Max(i,j))
    Aleph(i)*Aleph(j)=Aleph(Max(i,j))


    And so forth. So 2^infinity-1 = infinity, where "infinity" is whichever infinity you were talking about in the first place.


    This is basic transfinite arithmetic,


    hawk, who learned this directly from Halmos
    (yes, *that* Halmos)

  24. Lawyer: NO!!! on DMCA Attacks: NAI Tells Sites To Remove PGP (Updated) · · Score: 2
    I am a lawyer, but this is not legal advice. If you need that, then go pay for it!



    > To try is to never gain a "meeting of the minds", an absolute pre-requisite to contracts.


    NO! The "meeting of the minds" is frequently repeated by many, including some lawyers and some textbooks, but it's just plain WRONG.


    The standard is objective, not subjective. The validity of the contract is determined *entirely* from the provable circumstances, not what anyone thought they were doing.


    Also, as long as I'm at it, boilerplate statements that the boilerplate can't be changed, and written contracts that prohibit oral modifications, range from tricky to flat out invalid. The oral change to the contract changes and sets aside the no oral changes rule . . . "no unauthorized person may change" isn't overrriden by a purported change by an unauthorized person, but there might not be an offer and acceptance (the actual rule), or the contract may be other than intended . . .


    hawk, esq

  25. Re:Personally... on RMS Replies to "The Stallman Factor" · · Score: 2
    I'd give GNU almost the entire transmission to Linux's engine. Then you get the rest of the car from somewhere else, and end up naming it after the engine . . .


    hawk