Slashdot Mirror


Techies and Trekkies Unite!

emmetropia writes: "Startrek.com has announced that there is going going to be an Online Convention in early August. Every attendee will be able to make themselves look like any of your favorite ST species, Borg, Klingon, Vulcan, Terran, Ferengi, etc etc. The servers for the event are supposed to be able to handle up to 100,000 users, which would mean a rather large convention, let's just hope it doesn't suffer the same fate as Final Fantasy. With full 3D conventions here now, can a holodeck really be that far off?"

159 comments

  1. First post! by rev_doc80 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I have a holodeck already! I did it with a beowolf cluster of dreamcasts...

  2. Spock and Kirk stop by by destinyland · · Score: 1
    Thank god!

    For years to approximate geeky conversations between Spock and Kirk, I've been using this web site!

    ---
    Destiny-land.
    The happiest blog on earth.

    1. Re:Spock and Kirk stop by by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      OMG, I'm suddenly having USENET alt.aol-sucks '94+ flashbacks! Is DAwn McGatney still alive? ;)

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    2. Re:Spock and Kirk stop by by Anus+Bird+Girl · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      That takes me back.

      "AOL is sucks"

      Bisk poetry.

      Alas, all the fun ended when WebTV gave the AOLusers someone to look down on.

      (!)

  3. My very own prosthetic nose bridge wrinkle by Party+Remover · · Score: 1

    Sounds suspiciously like a chat room program with a clunky Flash interface. Woo.

    1. Re:My very own prosthetic nose bridge wrinkle by elmegil · · Score: 1
      Everybody wants prosthetic
      foreheads on their real heads

      either that or a rock to tie a string around, I forget

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  4. VMRL! :) by mlk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ohh they were fun back in err what 97 :)

    Wonder round a badly made 3D world, where people would try to talk to you, but you all really longed for a chain saw...

    Hmm.... shame it costs to play with, that would be fun.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  5. No info on the site by Triskaidekaphobia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are any of the "real" characters going to be there virtually? And, if so, how does one know whether one is chatting up the real Beverley or an imposter?

  6. techies and trekkies together??? by joe_bruin · · Score: 4, Funny

    mysql> select * from human where (human.trekkie=1 and human.techie=0);
    Empty set (0.00 sec)

    1. Re:techies and trekkies together??? by Thenomain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My mother (and doesn't this just tag me as a generational geek) has been a Trekkie since the original series originally aired. (She was also a ballerina and beatnik, two nontechie professions.)

      And yet, even to this very day, she has problems programming the VCR or understanding that wacky "folders" concept on computer GUIs.

      Star Trek was originally more about social commentary (a brightly coloured version of the Twilight Zone) than about science. I always got the impression that Star Trek was originally sci-fi almost by accident, just to be different for television.

      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
    2. Re:techies and trekkies together??? by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 2

      I'd always thought ST was Sci-fi because it was ok to tackle really tough social and even political issues in the realm of scifi... it wasn't close enough to reality for people to call roddenbury a commie.

      --
      I ate my sig.
    3. Re:techies and trekkies together??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no you've it all wrong!

      select * from human where human.trekkie .and. human.techie

      or you could to something more complicated, like:

      select * from human where ( human.trekkie .and. human.trekLevel > 10 ) .and. ( human.techie .and. human.techLevel > 10 ) .and.
      !human.hasGirlFriend .and. human.livesInParentsBasement

  7. Oddly Enough by CathedralRulz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oddly enough, treckies chances of getting laid at this convention are identical to those of getting laid at a real convention.

    1. Re:Oddly Enough by Triskaidekaphobia · · Score: 4, Funny

      OpenSource the client and you'll soon change those odds.

      void DrawAvatar()
      {
      DrawBody();
      DrawFace();
      DrawHair();
      // DrawClothes();

      return;
      }

    2. Re:Oddly Enough by doooras · · Score: 2

      I'm sure nobody will believe this, but...

      I had sex while watching Voyager once.

      there was a strange background noise the whole time though... sounded something like "turn that damn thing off" but i didn't pay any attention to it. must have been my imagination...

    3. Re:Oddly Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you so much for the mental image of 100,000 animated naked trekkers.

    4. Re:Oddly Enough by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      No, I don't belive it. The idea of someone watching Voyager is just a tad too far fetched for me. I liked the show, and I doubt I saw more than a couple episodes a season thanks to a really horrible upn station.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    5. Re:Oddly Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was lying. I reckon he was having sex after watching whatever was on before Voyager and just forgot to turn it off.

    6. Re:Oddly Enough by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Oddly enough, treckies chances of getting laid at this convention are identical to those of getting laid at a real convention.

      But at a real convention, at least you can pay someone to.. ummmm... yes. So I've heard, anyway.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    7. Re:Oddly Enough by Jerf · · Score: 2

      After those modifications, I'm afraid the previously-finite odds will be 2 to the power of Infinity minus one, an irrational number which only has application in Improbability Physics.

      Oops, wrong sci-fi series. We'll be restoring normalacy just as soon we are sure what is normal anyhow. Thank you!

    8. Re:Oddly Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oddly enough, I'd fucking kill myself before going to a Star Trek convention - virtual or real.

      Is there a more pathetic breed of fans than Star Trek? (Ok, ok, Open Source fans come close). Sad, fat, smelly wankers who think that Star Trek is, like, really high-brow... and that people who watch it are somehow more enlightened.

      Hey lamers: Star Trek is TV for thickos; it's soap opera on a starship with story lines that mangle theoretical physics almost beyond recognition (to make their wannabe nerd fans feel clever) and mix it with trite moral lessons (to make wannabe philosophers feel superior). In truth Star Trek is a bland mushy paste designed to be fed to shut-ins unable to cope with the complexities of the real world and real relationships, and who don't have the brains to really understand the scientific concepts so dreadfully abused by the writers.

      Oh yeah, and Gene Roddenberry... he was a hack ... and not a very good one.

    9. Re:Oddly Enough by streetlawyer · · Score: 2

      I hate to break the news to you that making your computer draw pictures of naked women is not actually the same thing as getting laid.

    10. Re:Oddly Enough by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      Not all people who like Star Trek consider themselves 'trekkies', nor do all trekkies necessarily think Star Trek is 'high brow'.

      I watch (and enjoy) Star Trek because it is so campy and overdone. Shatner is hilarious with his 'dramatic' pauses, and McCoy is just horrible by any definition. Add to it the recent revelation that Spock was drunk as a skunk most of the time, and that makes it all the more pathetic (and funny). I watch Star Trek for the same reasons I watch MST3K - campy, silly, and funny to laugh at.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    11. Re:Oddly Enough by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Agree...with most points

      I loved the original Trek though, can't stand to watch it now though

      I realized the next gen and all that weren't that clever when I started to play that buzzword bingo with my kids, and the word PLASMA was heard on almost every other episode

      And when they thought that including the Borg would make it an action series

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    12. Re:Oddly Enough by Titanium+Angel · · Score: 0
      it's soap opera [...] with story lines that mangle theoretical physics almost beyond recognition (to make their wannabe nerd fans feel clever) and mix it with trite moral lessons (to make wannabe philosophers feel superior). In truth [...] [it] is a bland mushy paste designed to be fed to shut-ins unable to cope with the complexities of the real world and real relationships, and who don't have the brains to really understand the scientific concepts so dreadfully abused by the writers.

      Kinda reminds me of Star Wars :)
    13. Re:Oddly Enough by CathedralRulz · · Score: 1

      Only a dedicated fan who has watched many episodes can come to that conclusion.

    14. Re:Oddly Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the chances are even BETTER on a online convention. :)

  8. No Linux/Mac interface!!! by strredwolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    UGH! No Linux/Mac interface. Geesh, they should of just used the Quake 2 engine instead. You know that was portable.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:No Linux/Mac interface!!! by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      This thing sounds like it's going to be something like EverQuest, however, that requires downloads, cd's etc. Do we have some games like EverQuest for Linux? That is a Sony product, and they are interested in Linux, a kit is soon to be out for the PS2 that converts it to a linux box. Thousands were sold in Japan. A star trek convention/game sounds like a good way to get folks started on a new permanent game, where the "convention" goes on forever. Also, there is Neverwinter Nights, very nice, but no real way to get players interested like a Star Trek Convention idea.

    2. Re:No Linux/Mac interface!!! by Bagheera · · Score: 2

      Exactly.... Funny that SciFi fans are often the "Early Adopters" of new technology - but organizations like Creation don't seem to grock anything but the Mass Market.

      Ah well. Another decent idea shot to hell by Greedy Bastids locked in the Wintendo world. I'll hold out for "The Real Thing" at World Con in San Jose...

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    3. Re:No Linux/Mac interface!!! by h00pla · · Score: 1
      3D CONVENTION CENTER MINIMUM COMPUTER SPECIFICATIONS

      Operating System: Windows 95, 98, Me, NT, XP and 2000.

      Sorry. No Linux, no show

      --
      I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
  9. l33t h4x0rs by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How long before someone 0wns the convention server system?

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:l33t h4x0rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Offtopic? How the fuck is a question about the system's security offtopic?

  10. Great! by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Funny


    Rather than going to a traditional sci-fi convention where I would fail to get laid, I can attend an online convention and fail to get cybersex. Computers really have improved my life...

  11. This kinda takes the fun out of... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of my favorite ways to have fun. I dress up in my Jedi robes with my lightsaber, and crash the real convetions. Had a friend who would dress up as Solo too. Damn the trekkies would go apeshit. But then we took it too far, and my friend started in on someone dressed up as Scotty about how the Falcon could outrun that ugly looking enterprise... The second largest ST convetion riot in North America.

    Ouch.

    1. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my favorite ways to have fun. I dress up in my Jedi robes with my lightsaber, and crash the real convetions. Had a friend who would dress up as Solo too. Damn the trekkies would go apeshit

      So one of your FAVORITE ways to have fun is to go where other people are having a good time, and make them upset. Let me guess... you didn't have a lot of friends in high school, and you are unfamiliar with the phrase "Stockholm syndrome"?

    2. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      I am unfamiliar with that phrase actually. I didn't have alot of friends in high school either (except for "Han").

      We also went to a few rennaisance festivals in our star trek costumes. Was fun to go up to the "elves" (WTF do elves have to do with a ren festival?) and do the "Live long and prosper" gesture. Then my friend would whip out the "tricorder" and start talking star trek mumbo jumbo. Was funny as hell. We were politely asked to leave, though we did manage to get them to refund our entrance fee.

    3. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah, and then you piss off _that_ guy by pointing out how the TARDIS can beat everything else. *shrug* What're ya gonna do? The grass is always greener...

    4. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      The Renaissance faire I work at (New York) has supposedly had an "away party" of Trekkies come to visit once a year, although in my 2 years I missed them the first year and they never showed the second year.

      One guy told me the story about how he went up to them and started screaming at them for violating the Prime Directive when he had worked so hard to establish himself as one of the natives and asking for their serial numbers to report them to Starfleet.

      I don't think they were ever kicked out or anything so it's probably a different faire.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    5. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, yeah and you became a /. nerd after that... sure.

    6. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by armb · · Score: 2

      > Well, yeah, and then you piss off _that_ guy by pointing out how the TARDIS can beat everything else.

      The Doctor's TARDIS had constant problems. Now if you're talking about a fully working Gallifreian TARDIS, yep - because anyone building anything that can compete is likely to find their planet timelooped before they start :-).

      --
      rant
    7. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Prime Directive hasn't been ratified yet. Unless they traveled in time to get there, and then you don't know *when* they came from and they can come back and fix things if they have to anyway. This all makes my head hurt.

      Time travel, like warp drive, is just a plot device.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    8. Re:This kinda takes the fun out of... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      > The Doctor's TARDIS had constant problems.

      Mmm, yeah, like the Falcon was always in perfect working condition. :)

  12. rofl 2 da lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lmao 2 da rofl, lololo lol you fucvking fagd!

    lmao @ yall bunch of llama nerd gimpz, lol rfol Get a fuqing Life Dudes, rOFL! omg i cant sotp laughin g WOW LETS ALL JERk off with my penis in yotu butt rofl lol.... hehe bye lol, fuking phagZ

  13. Vir-Con by The+Dark · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The trekkies already know they are virgins, do they have to shove the 'V' word right in their faces?

    --
    sig's not here
  14. Online convention? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    It's like an imaginary convention except you're not the only loser there.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  15. My fondest dream by tbarrie · · Score: 3, Funny
    Every attendee will be able to make themselves look like any of your favorite ST species, Borg, Klingon, Vulcan, Terran, Ferengi,

    Finally, I can look like a Terran!

    1. Re:My fondest dream by Slashamatic · · Score: 2

      Hey, can I come as Captain Kirk's Hairpiece? It was certainly more sentient than what was under it.

    2. Re:My fondest dream by Kredal · · Score: 1

      That's not a hairpiece... it's a tribble!

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  16. Space Balls! by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1

    Hey, can I go as Lone Star?

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:Space Balls! by cybercrap · · Score: 0

      Fine, but i got dibs on Mr Helmet, oh yes and the schwartz ring.

    2. Re:Space Balls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see my schwartz is longer than yours. (smack) (bzzt) (more weird sounds) I hate it when my schwarz gets twisted.

  17. Woah. by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was it just strange coincidence that I have caught this thread at 7 of 9 comments? I think not. =)

    And what about the the ability to handle 100,000 clients, is that really going to be enough? I mean, there are a lot of admitted trekkies in the world, but there are several more out there in the 'closet' which would see something this as a welcomed invite to attend a trekkie convention whereas they wouldn't have in RealLife(tm).

    --
    ======
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
    1. Re:Woah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dickhead or dick head? either way, it's you!

  18. Hope for the best by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's worse? Not getting cybersex or finding out you just did it with some guy pretending to be a Ferengi female. *shudder*

    1. Re:Hope for the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, at least you cant get any STDs from touching someones ear.

    2. Re:Hope for the best by 56ker · · Score: 1

      And via a computer you wouldn't be able to check her lobes. Then again there was that episode where Quark was fooled by a female wearing fake lobes.

    3. Re:Hope for the best by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      or finding out you just did it with some guy pretending to be a Ferengi female. *shudder*

      Or C:

      The thought of having sex with a Ferengi at all. . . .

      (EEEW!)

    4. Re:Hope for the best by Niksie3 · · Score: 0

      Actually, ferengi females don't wear clothes...

      --
      Sig you!
  19. Ask a silly question by yoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    With full 3D conventions here now, can a holodeck really be that far off?

    Yes.
    Next question?

  20. Have you ever noticed... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2

    That out of all the space going races in the star trek universe, the race the American government most resembles is the Ferengi....

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
    1. Re:Have you ever noticed... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Strange, I always thought they were an even mix of romulans, ferengi and cardassian myself.

    2. Re:Have you ever noticed... by EverDense · · Score: 1

      By narrowing the parameters a little, you can see they are actually more like Captain Kirk.
      Cluelessly trying to screw every sentient being they can find.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    3. Re:Have you ever noticed... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Yeh, but that is very unfair to Shatner. He has the Super-Rug 9000, the most amazing piece of hair replacement technology to ever be developed. Most politicians are bald.

  21. Haiku! by Haiku_troll · · Score: 0

    Online convention
    One more reason Star Trek fans
    Will never get laid

    1. Re:Haiku! by rootlocus · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Haiku Troll!
      You make Slashdot worth reading..
      Mod this parent up!

  22. Holofuture by TechFaerie · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Oh yes, I met my love at the HoloConference 2012. We both had the same avatar....it was love at first click. She gave me her IP address, and we got married the week later in VirtuVegas."

    Welcome to the future, ladies and gentlemen.

    --
    "To make apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe." -Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Holofuture by doooras · · Score: 2

      I hope that HoloConference is before December 22...

  23. I hate Startrek !!! by fini · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'am a techy, a geek, a nerd, call it what you want. And, I hate Startrek ! I really do hate Startrek. I mean, that Startrek stuff is so, so, ...

    Arfff, there's no word for that boring sclerotic half-assed sit-com, full of wooden third rate actors, stupid plots, 3 hours long "meaningful glances", you know, all those crappy sitcom gimmicks. May be Startrek is not the worst of the sitcom lot, but it's still a damn bloody lousy sitcom. If you want SF, read Frank Herbert, Dan Simmons, etc. I don't know. Do something ! But not Startrek, please, not Startrek.

    Startrek is dumb and life is too short to do dumb things. So please, stop slapping Startrek and Geekdom together, please, please, please....

    --
    SNS Not Sig
    1. Re:I hate Startrek !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, Star Trek is two words.

    2. Re:I hate Startrek !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll or not, I have to agree with him.

      Geek != Star Trek fan.

      Star Trek fan != Sci Fi fan.

      Star Trek is space opera - nothing more. Where they spew technobabble, shows like Babylon 5 show realistic ideas on how things would work. And even B5 is a space opera.

      If you want science fiction, read some books, because you likely won't see any on television.

      If you work with computers, it doesn't mean you're an emotionless pointy eared freak.

    3. Re:I hate Startrek !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think TNG, Voyager or Enterprise really classify as sitcom's.. you do realize that sit-com is short for situational comedy right? They are more of a drama or a space-set action soap opera than a comedy most of the time.

    4. Re:I hate Startrek !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " life is too short to do dumb things"
      Posting to Slashdot hey? :-)

    5. Re:I hate Startrek !!! by Arsewiper · · Score: 1
      With you all the way on this one. We should overun the convention as Kirk (avatar in bad wig and corset to keep the fat gut in). ST is the worstdull colonialism is psace nonsense. If you develop a teleporter why not just teleport a bomb onto an enemy ship, or a spoon into their leader's head, or even the contents of the sewage tanks into their command deck.

      Joan Collins visited make-up and asked "Who's the little fat bald guy?" and was told, "Oh, that's Captain Kirk."

  24. actually, by nomadic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    With full 3D conventions here now, can a holodeck really be that far off?

    Yes.

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Ummm... by bteeter · · Score: 1

    A holodeck is quite different from an online conference. Even if it is in 3D. I think we're a LONG way from having a holodeck like environment. We probably won't see such a thing in our lifetimes, or for that matter, our kids lifetimes.

    Brian

    --

    Search for a New Web Host

    --

  28. Terran? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    As much as I like the term terran, they always refer to earthlings as "humans" Star Trek.

    1. Re:Terran? by catsidhe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the Klingon word for human is tera'ngan, or something similar.

      ...oh god, did I just say that? Did I really just admit to knowing some tlhIngan Hol?

      My life is so sad and empty.

      --
      "This is a Hollywood movie: when it comes to the Laws of Physics, they're lucky if they get Gravity!" --- my wife
  29. Defcon & Star Trek Convention dates by sladelink · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone else notice that this ST convention is going to be on the same three days (August 2nd - 4th) in Las Vegas as Defcon X is going to be? Drunk techies and trekies in Las Vegas = biggest, nerdiest party ever.

    --
    sigs are dumb.
  30. Why waste good online time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At a virtual con, when I can be downloading porn?

  31. Re:Utterly unsurprising by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    Can't accept the obvious fact of inferiority, can you woman?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  32. Re:Utterly unsurprising by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Whoa! It's the fake Los Alamos PhD troll. I laughed when someone pointed out in a previous comment of yours, that you didn't even know which state Los Alamos was in.

    But anyway, back on topic. Star Trek was incredibly liberal for its day, showing on a primetime show, russians, asians, blacks and women all working together for a common (mostly) peaceful cause. So even if you are full of bullshit, it was a nice troll.

    Maybe if this level of trolling is too much for you, you can practice on something easier, like page-widening.

  33. Re:I would point out my degree by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    Hee hee. You're so cute when you get like that!

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  34. This crap turns me off by rerunn · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an avid fan, I was interested and decided to sign up. I happened to mistakingly clicked on their privacy policy and I found this buried in the bottom:

    VCLLC may also sell, transfer or otherwise disclose user information, including PII, in connection with a corporate merger, consolidation, the sale of substantially all assets, or other fundamental corporate change.


    So, if they all of sudden become a porn spewing outfit, they have all those email addys and what they call "PII" (personally identifiable information -- like your address and phone number)at their disposal.

    Stupid internet.

  35. Are you nuts? by Bnonn · · Score: 1
    Who'd want to have sex with a Ferengi female? Sick man, have you seen their teeth? Not to mention that the lobes alone are enough to put a guy off any kind of enjoyment.

    Give me a Vulcan any day. Superior strength, stamina and physiological control. The sexy pointed ears are just the creme^H^Ham on the pudding baby.

  36. I'll take LiveCons Anyday by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    C'mon, especially those who've attended a con Marriott Hunt Valley in Cockeysville, MD, a Virtual Con can't supply a comfortable seat at the Paddock Bar and the soothing waters of a well-attended jacuzzi.

    And that's probably the best thing about a con -- the afterhours partying and socializing (and, ahem, other activities between/among consenting adults ;P).

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:I'll take LiveCons Anyday by mosch · · Score: 2
      Oh man, I was at that con, and it was OFF THE HOOK!

      BOTH of the chicks got laid!

  37. Re:Wow, blacks AND women! by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    In fact, all leadership roles on Star Trek, old and new, are white males.

    I'm not even a huge star trek fan and even I know the captin in Voyager was a woman. Not to mention in Enterprise of the three most cerebral people on the ship, two are female.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  38. Re:Wow, blacks AND women! by Bnonn · · Score: 2
    • In fact, all leadership roles on Star Trek, old and new, are white males.
    Except for the black Captain Benjamin Sisko in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and the female Captain Kathryn Janeway in Star Trek: Voyager...
  39. I'd give anything... by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...to see a small groups of Vorlons crash the party and start talking cryptic trash to the trekkies. :-)

    "How do you think this Convention is going to end?"

    "In fire."

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    1. Re:I'd give anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Wonder if JMS or anyone who was on the set would be able to get us some specs for the encounter suits. I fear they might've been mostly computer animated though. :/

      At the least, we could always go in EarthForce uniforms.

      *sigh* I'd kill to do this. I routinely beat down my Trekkie friends with pointless comparisons. They always end their arguments with 'The Enterprise' (or whatever ship) would just warp away!

      "So.. The best of Starfleet can't handle a single White Star?"

      (I try not to piss off my Klingon loving friends. Especially the ones that go to cons - they tend to have the build of Klingons. Whereas the Federation-loving dogs, well, their punches don't really hurt. ;))

    2. Re:I'd give anything... by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

      "How do you think this Convention is going to end?"

      "In fire."


      Well, those Vorlons throw one hell of a Dead Dog Party.

      (I'd make some additional "Million Year Picnic" allusion here, but I'm tired.)

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    3. Re:I'd give anything... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      The Vorlon encounter suits are not CG, the Vorlon ships are. Be funny to drive one of those through the convention hall. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  40. Re:Wow, blacks AND women! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Sulu is also shown to have gotten his own ship in the future.

    Then there is Guinan in TNG who all of the white males are continuously coming to beg advice from. :)

  41. Is your select right? by Wee · · Score: 2
    mysql> select * from human where (human.trekkie=1 and human.techie=0);
    Empty set (0.00 sec)

    You want all the people that are trekkies and techies, right? I'm maybe a little rusty, but wouldn't you want something like this:

    mysql> select * from human where (human.trekkie=1 and human.techie=1);

    That is, you want all rows where the records indicate that the subject is both a trekkie and a techie? Or maybe it'd be more clear if you had two columns like this:

    CREATE TABLE human (
    id INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
    trekkie ENUM('YES','NO') DEFAULT 'NO',
    techie ENUM('YES','NO') DEFAULT 'NO'
    );

    Then you could say:

    mysql> select * from human where (human.trekkie='YES' and human.techie='YES');

    Which is the same thing, I guess. Maybe. I'm not sure. Anyway, this got much too geeky...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Is your select right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, you are really stupid. Even I understood what he was trying to say and i couldnt tell the difference between SQL and MySQL. If you look carefully, he was trying to select all trekkies that are not techies. However, he gets no results, since all trekkies are also techies.

      Joke

      Your head

    2. Re:Is your select right? by Thenomain · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure he meant "find all trekkies that are not techies" and implied that there aren't any. So his select statement is correct. Under your table structure, it would look like:
      mysql> select * from human where (human.trekkie='YES' and human.techie='NO');
      Mind you, I would like to see a non-human techie. I mean, really, a pet that prefers Star Trek to, say, Bengi or Ally McBeal.

      No, strike that. I really don't want to meet an animal Trekkie. I mean, it could do real damage demanding I call it a "Treker".
      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
  42. Re:Utterly unsurprising by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Therefore I am unsurprised that "techies" (i.e. a bunch of young, rich, white males)

    I swear, even if you ARE a troll;

    The next time that SOME ASSHOLE CALLS ME RICH/MIDDLE CLASS. . . .

    DAMNIT

    pisses me off.

    And only 1/3rd caucasion, yeesh.

    POOR MINORITY MALE THANK YOU OH SO VERY MUCH.

    /:D

  43. What the heck?!? by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Funny

    With full 3D conventions here now, can a holodeck really be that far off?

    Is it some unofficial rule that the last sentence in a story (either of the submitter or the posters making) has to be incredibly banal and idiotic?? This one about takes the cake...yeesh.

  44. Re:Utterly unsurprising by Bnonn · · Score: 2
    If you'd like to actually turn this into a debate, Dr Troll Biscuit, I'd be happy to oblige. First let me outline my points:
    • the highest-ranking female seen to date in Star Trek is Captain Kathryn Janeway, the lead character in Star Trek: Voyager
    • if you'd like to complain about "servitude", you should note that everyone is in a position of servitude to the captain
    • "captain" is only a sexually-charged word if you choose to make it so for your own disingenuous purposes; it has been a rank since at least the 1700s
    • Riker is never portrayed as predatory in my recollection. Women on the "new" show you refer to, Star Trek: The Next Generation which began airing in 1988 (from memory; I could be a year or two off), are presented in positions of authority and importance: Dr Beverly Crusher, the ship's chief medical officer; Lt Tasha Yar (since deceased on the show), the chief security officer for the first season or so; and Deanna Troi, the ship's counsellor who is always on the bridge
    • techies comprise only a small percentage of Star Trek's total viewership and fan base
    • you should indeed be modded down, for you are a troll. However, since other people less informed than myself may believe you (and obviously have, since you've been modded insightful (good troll btw)), I am replying to set the facts straight.
    I'd be glad to discuss in greater depth any or all of the Star Trek programs, should you choose to rise to the bait.
  45. Re:Wow, blacks AND women! by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Um, don't remember seeing any whips, to be honest.

    Cap. Janeway was supposedly a woman, though some are still demanding a chromosome test. The black woman was a commisioned officer, as opposed to the asian and russian who were both ensigns iirc. And despite how you like to troll it up, a communications specialist on a military ship is anything but a "receptionist". Not that you'd know much about that. As for a starship pilot being a "chauffeur"... oh well. You say the show was misogynistic, and yet it appears to be you that is the man-hater. Me, I've always sort of thought that everyone has only ever been as far away from the other sex as a few gene expressions taking place the first couple days after conception. I totally accept the fact that both men and women (like yourself) are totally fucked up. Funny, but you're just another part of the problem you hate so much. Haha.

    The new show:
    Geordi Laforge was black, last time I noticed. Cap. Sisko was black. I seem to remember more than a few female admirals too, one show or another.

  46. star trek or star wars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just goes to show that Star Trek kicks Star Wars' ass!

  47. 100,000 Losers In One Place.. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    Sounds like a prime opportunity to test out those miniature tactical nukes our government is whispering about. Whoever it doesn't kill, it sterilizes -- Something that would allow us to forget the past as well as preventing this sort of thing from happening in the future.

    Sounds like a good deal to me.

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:100,000 Losers In One Place.. by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      I enjoy Star Trek. I mean I really love it. One of the only shows on TV I've ever watched. I realize it's not exactly the pinacle of writing acting, etc, but still, I have fun with it.

      But stuff like that. The juror. It makes me want to cry. Or scream. Or both.

      I've been a fan of Star Trek since The Next Generation came out when I was very young. But still, I've never been to a convention. Never wanted to.

      People like that *realy bother me*.

      It's not just them either. I *have* been to ren fairs. Not in character or costume or anything. Just to see what it was like. I had a good time. And I know a lot of people that do those things regularly. But there seem to be three types of people that go. 1) Those that go casualy. Perhaps not even in any type of costume. These people don't make a big deal about it. 2) Those that get costumes, and become part of the festival. Entertaining people that go by adding themselves to the "play" that is the ren fair, while having a good time themselves. These people know when the fair ends and real life begins. 3) Those people that go to the fairs, get REALLY into it (often times going way too far) and then still pretend they're at a ren fair even when they're not.

      The woman in your links would appear to be the Star Trek equivelant of the third group. These are the ones to be very, very wary of.

      I might point out though that if you were to actually read the article, this is a VIRTUAL convention. Nobody will be in the same place. But I just had to reply because I so, so agree with your sentiment. Even as a Star Trek fan myself. There is a very... undesirable element that these sort of things attract (or perhaps they actually foster it?).

  48. Re:Wow, blacks AND women! by Carmody · · Score: 2

    In fact, all leadership roles on Star Trek, old and new, are white males.

    Who is the silly, silly person?
    Besides sisko and janeway, there were lots of female admirals, and Captain Sulu, and lots of others.

    And, a digression: Why do we use the phrase "white women" but for the other gender people say "white males." Like they are some other species?

    --
    God is real unless declared integer
  49. Re:Wow, blacks AND women! by Bnonn · · Score: 1
    Feminists, in my experience, are generally as chauvanistic toward men as they accuse men of being towards women.

    Besides that, anyone who can get misogynism out of Star Trek has gotta be a bit screwed in the head. Now, I doubt the parent is a feminist as much as a troll, but nonetheless I've seen feminists come out with some weird shit; all of it easily refutable until it enters their warped minds.

    Note that I'm particularly fond of females, and believe in equity, Dr Biscuit.

  50. I wonder what Wil Wheaton will show up as? by Ainu · · Score: 1

    Gee, would anyone at this online convention believe CleverNickName when he says "Hi! I'm Wil Wheaton!" in all virtual Wesleyness?

    1. Re:I wonder what Wil Wheaton will show up as? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wil Wheaties loves to gargle c0xor!

  51. Re:Utterly unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, there have been quite a few female admirals on the shows. The highest rank we've seen more than once on the show.

  52. Re:Utterly unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One third? That must have been an interesting conception scene.

  53. Re:Utterly unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been female admirals like that short blond hair lady Nachayov or whatever. For example in that two-part episode where Picard is captured by Cardassians after a set-up mission searching for a "meta-genic" weapon, she is the person who orders Picard to go on the mission and gives Capt. Gelico command of the Enterprise.

    Thank you.

  54. One of my favourites by enigma48 · · Score: 1


    Vorlon: They are a dying race.

    Us: Microsofties? or Hollingites?

    Vorlon: Yes.

  55. Re:Wow, blacks AND women! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the other gender people say "white males."

    Use of the "white male" phrase is a sure sign of a femi-bigot, and if you see it you can take it as read that anything else that person says is utter nonsense and can safely be ignored.

  56. Techies and Trekkies Unite? by Phouk · · Score: 1

    That which is one cannot unite.

    --
    Stupidity is mis-underestimated.
  57. If you look closely you find that ... by CyberQ · · Score: 1
    ... the requirements will scare away a good part of techies. Namely those not having a windos box lying around to play silly games:

    3D CONVENTION CENTER MINIMUM COMPUTER SPECIFICATIONS

    Operating System: Windows 95, 98, Me, NT, XP and 2000.

    Taken from www.vir-con.net.

    --
    Line 9: Argument of type SIGNATURE expected.
  58. Dead technology of Blaxxun by Kultamarja · · Score: 1

    Interesting that they are hosting the convention with technology from Blaxxun Interactive, a company that went bust couple of months ago. Wonder how viable are their plans to get 100,000 people online based on a dead non-supported proprietary technolgy..

    This is from Blaxxun.com site : "blaxxun interactive AG began insolvency proceedings on 1 March 2002. All options for preserving some part of the company or for exploiting the blaxxun software are currently being considered."

    Blaxxun is based on the old VRML Java crap, no way I'm going to believe it could support 100,000 online users at the same time. To my understanding there are far better technologies to do that out there, www.taikatech.com, www.zona.net and www.rebelarts.com to name a few.

  59. Re:Utterly unsurprising by t0qer · · Score: 2

    Hehe, while we're on the subject of high ranking female ST officers, a few you missed are..

    7of9, Tactical
    Lt. Torrez, Engineering
    Vulcan Science officer on Enterprise

    And the female Admerial everyone keeps reffering too, she was in the TNG episode with the scorpions that buried in the back of your neck and took over your mind.

  60. Hahaha. by Gannoc · · Score: 2


    They're going to have to make the avatars quite a bit more chubby if they're going to make it seem like a real convention.

  61. no fun by peter303 · · Score: 2

    The pupose of conventions is to bring strange people together. Onine is no fun.

  62. holodeck? I think not. by edstromp · · Score: 1
    With full 3D conventions here now, can a holodeck really be that far off?

    I think not. 3D pictures on a screen is one thing. Having it surround you and convince you that it is reality is someting all together different.

  63. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think it wasn't in SQL. I tried typing it in and all it did was give me an error message.

  64. Phew! by dmauer · · Score: 1

    I was getting rather worried that this site had degraded into just another News For Tech People site... honestly, there's something wrong with the world when i can open up the front page of /. and not see a single article that I'd be embarrassed to admit I was reading.

    I can feel my emotional pocket protector growing strong once again.

    -d

    --
    === "Some people see the glass as half-empty. Others see it as half-full. I see the glass as too big." -G. Carlin.
  65. In order to truly capture the virtual experience by lww · · Score: 1

    of thousands of geeks at a con won't they have to perfect Digiscents iSmell as well?

    Hmm, come to think of it, I might actually pay more to attend virtually than physically if they promised not to turn that on ;)

  66. Re:Utterly unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "However, since other people less informed than myself..."

    There are no such people, even here at slashdot.

  67. Re:Utterly unsurprising by erpbridge · · Score: 2

    Her name is Nora Satie, and she was also in a later episode, "The Drumhead", where she went on a witch hunt onboard Enterprise.

  68. your math is wrong (basic infinite math) by hawk · · Score: 2
    >I'm afraid the previously-finite odds will be 2
    >to the power of Infinity minus one, an irrational number


    No. Aleph(0) is the infinity of the integers. Aleph(1) is the infinity of the continuum.


    Aleph(i)=2**Aleph(i-1)
    Aleph(i)+Aleph(j)=Aleph( Max(i,j))
    Aleph(i)*Aleph(j)=Aleph(Max(i,j))


    And so forth. So 2^infinity-1 = infinity, where "infinity" is whichever infinity you were talking about in the first place.


    This is basic transfinite arithmetic,


    hawk, who learned this directly from Halmos
    (yes, *that* Halmos)

    1. Re:your math is wrong (basic infinite math) by Jerf · · Score: 2

      You're right in the real world.

      My quote is from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy". In it, one of the main sci-fi devices the author postulates is an "improbability field", which can make events of various improbabilities occur. This makes for a very, very wacky Universe, which was the main point of the book series. (It took me many years to realize that once you accept the Improbability Field, the wackiness of that universe inevitably follows, meaning that as humourous as The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is, it's actually hard-core sci-fi.)

      To handle the Improbability fields, in particular the Infinite Improbability Field generated by one of the main ships featured in the novels, improbability mathematics exists. In that mathematics, "two to the power of infinity minus one" has some meaning, undefined because A: We probably wouldn't understand it and B: Who really cares? (Personally, I think Douglas Adams just got lucky in meeting the criterion for hard sci-fi; math and tech don't much figure into the stories.)

      So, having thoroughly explained and ruined the joke, that's where my post came from. You seem earnest and honest, so I'll give you a similar explanation. ;-)

    2. Re:your math is wrong (basic infinite math) by hawk · · Score: 2
      I remember that drive . . . but it's been, ummm, well, let's not go there :)


      I'm surprised I didn't catch the math error given when I read it :)


      hawk

  69. Dune Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like Star Trek, although I've never been to a convention. I partially agree with the earlier reply that said "try out some Frank Herbert." If you call yourself a ST fan and have NOT read all six books of the Dune Chronicles you are missing a world at least as provocative as the Star Trek realities.

    (BTW: The last time I logged in was a year ago and I don't have my password anymore. I am MuadDib@dunechronicles.com NOT anonymous coward.)

  70. Re:Utterly unsurprising by Artifex · · Score: 2

    What you say rings true; however, I just saw a one-off magazine down at Fry's that touted that it was "Timeless Star Trek." There were three captains on the cover.

    Can you guess which three?

    Kirk, Picard, and... Archer?

    Ugh. Not only does the target market appear to be misogynist, there's probably also racism involved. Janeway and Sisko each have more "right" to be on the cover than Archer. No offense to the actor who plays Archer, but the fewest people seem to like his show or his character.

    But God help us if anyone but white guys are on that cover, right? The market segmentation seems clearer if you can assume that publisher tested covers in focus groups before picking one, and that the artist didn't just say "I don't know how to draw those two" or "I don't know who they are."

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  71. Mid South Con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The changes are about 10000% better at a con like our Mid South Science Fiction and Fantasy Con. It's fan run and its in Memphis. As you might know, Memphis has its own little bubble of reality. I can explain it, but you will not believe it until you see it yourself.

    Next Con is in March 2003 at the Holiday/Airport/comfort/budget/whatthehellnameit willbein2003 hotel by the airport. More info to come!