Slashdot Mirror


Sun Discovers Dumb Terminals

Yahoo has a story about how Sun is practicing a sort of floating workforce - many employees have no permanent desks, they just come in and log on to a dumb terminal, err, thin client. Besides being a sneaky way to encourage employees to arrive ever earlier at work, it probably is cheaper to run the business off a few large Sun servers - at least for Sun.

534 comments

  1. interesting by OriginalUsername · · Score: 0

    I am writing this at a dumb terminal. Or something.

    1. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol!

  2. Real brilliant. by Chardish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Never mind the fact that employees like to have file cabinets, desk toys, and other stuff to keep them happy during the day, and organized and productive. Essentially what Sun has said in implementing this concept is "everything important about your job is on the computer, or small enough to be carried with you everywhere you go."

    -Evan

    1. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      All those things you mentioned only serve to contribute to workplace clutter. An efficient workplace requires one terminal, one chair, and some sort of desk.. perhaps a small table to hold the terminal. Everything should be able to be done on the terminal and require no paper or anything that would even require a file cabinet.

    2. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything important *is* tied to your computer. We call it Nethack.

    3. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I used to enjoy working at Sun. But, little by little, the job moved from "You are a respected professional" to "Sit down, shut up, plug in."

      When they took my Ultra 10 (when I was in the other side of the globe working for then in Singapore, yeas actually working on my machine) and replaced it with a SunRay, that was the last straw. I was at another company within a month.

      Sun used to be cool. It's too bad those days are forgotten in wistful memories of paper billions never realized. I was there when NeXt was cool and happening. I was there when Sun was cool and happening. I was there when Linux was cool and happening.

      At least mac OS X and the TiBook are still cool and happening. Sun sure isn't.

      BTW, IBM just fuloughed me as well on Friday. Gotta make some fat pasty white men in suits a little richer, you know. Fsck the economy, the inerrelated nature of money flow, and the stability of our society. I freakin hate supposed tech managers.

    4. Re:Real brilliant. by supremebob · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not to mention all that you're going to be wasting a bunch of time looking for co-workers if, (god forbid!) you actually wanted to TALK to them in person. I'd see this scenario happening often... "Gee, where is John today? Floor 2, B section? Floor 3, A section? I better give him a call first... Wait, did he say 2B-47A, or 2A-47B? Oops, better call him again..." You get the idea. You would also have to learn where practically every printer and fax machine in the entire building is, because it would vary depending upon where you sit. Either that, or you're going to be walking 500 feet to pick up your printout because you forgot to change your default printer from yesterday. Wow, whoever came up with this idea is quite a moron. It's almost like taking all the bad parts of working at the office and telecommuting and combining them into a living nightmare.

    5. Re:Real brilliant. by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Think more along the lines of computer user. A worker can have his own desk, and his own thin client. If his thin client catches on fire, it takes like 5 minutes to restore it. If you need help on an application, just take your smartcard to your co-workers desk and ask him to look at it. Same for presentations.

      And from an admin point, I just finished patching 20 boxes for known security holes. Wouldn't it be great to just patch one server?

      I don't think the point of this tech it to get rid of your desk, just to get rid of the concept of "Bob's computer".

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    6. Re:Real brilliant. by packeteer · · Score: 1, Troll

      I dunno about everyone else but i LIKE it when my workstation breaks down. At my high school that i go to we run MS Visual C++ 6.0 on some win98 boxes... not pretty. But despite this i would go crazy is they didn't crash on me. First of all i get a nice time to step back and defrag my mind during the long ass reboot, and second if i was working for 8 hours straight like yoru supposed to I would go nuts. If every couple of hours somehting is wrong and it takes me a half an hour to fix it thats fun time for me. I enjoy messing with computers and it gives me a quick break. :) am i alone?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    7. Re:Real brilliant. by elmegil · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Insightful, for someone who doesn't have half a clue of how the system works? There's a java-based tool that lets you say "I want to know where Jim is sitting today", and it shows you on a bloody floor plan. How stupid do you have to be that you can't read a floor plan?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    8. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes it all ok.

      Too much wintenberry jelly for you.

    9. Re:Real brilliant. by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 0, Troll

      First of all i get a nice time to step back and defrag my mind during the long ass reboot

      When you get into the real world, you will find that most bosses understand the concept of thinking time. See The Hacker FAQ for detail on how hackers work. We all need time to think, bosses get that.

      If every couple of hours somehting is wrong and it takes me a half an hour to fix it thats fun time for me

      Agian, in the real world, you get paid to do a specific job. I program and monitor routers. When my computer breaks, I call the Help Desk and log a job. I like working on computers too, but at work, my job is not to fix broken computers. If I were to try and fix my box, I would probably get fired for goofing off. The chances that I would really make the prob worse is slim, but still, it is someone elses job. I get paid $60k to fix routers, the help desk gets paid $40k to fix PCs. You do the math.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    10. Re:Real brilliant. by elmegil · · Score: 1

      The point was not that it's "all ok", the point was the fool's posting wasn't even remotely close to the real reasons it's not ok

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    11. Re:Real brilliant. by nathanh · · Score: 5, Informative
      You would also have to learn where practically every printer and fax machine in the entire building is, because it would vary depending upon where you sit. Either that, or you're going to be walking 500 feet to pick up your printout because you forgot to change your default printer from yesterday.

      Not even close. The login process for each dumb terminal (with the swipe card) automatically sets your default printer to the nearest printer. It even routes your phone number automatically to the handset on your desk.

      The brilliant bit is that you can pull your swipe card out, move to a different desk, put the card back in, and your entire desktop reappears without a single application lost. And your phone moved with you!

      I'd see this scenario happening often... "Gee, where is John today? Floor 2, B section? Floor 3, A section? I better give him a call first... Wait, did he say 2B-47A, or 2A-47B? Oops, better call him again..."

      You just click on the username and it shows the floorplan with John's current desk location highlighted.

      Wow, whoever came up with this idea is quite a moron.

      But it isn't! On a normal day you tend to work on dozens of projects. This system lets you move all the people in a specific project together, so you are sitting right next to the people you are working with. Two hours later you move to the next project on your list so you move near the people working on that project.

      You're always sitting in close proximity to the people you're working with. A traditional desk-per-user system means you're always walking up/down stairs or between buildings. This new system means your desktop moves with you.

      The downside is that your pens and manuals don't move with you. In practise this encourages people to work out of their briefcases, which is convenient for techs who spend most of their time onsite. It does away with the "damn, I left the important list of instructions on my desk back at work".

    12. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So let me get this straight...

      • You weren't clever enough to defend your continued need of an Ultra, so they took it from you.
      • You then left in a huff and wound up working for IBM, a company well *known* to be a faceless, colorless, soul-sucking pit.
      • IBM canned you 2 days ago.

      I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

    13. Re:Real brilliant. by istartedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bah! An efficient workplace requires people who know how to work with eachother, relationships, context, the right ammount of routine balanced against variety.

      The mass-produced interchangeable part paradigm works very well with machines. Since the dawn of the assembly-line, corporate wonks have been trying to do it with people, and with miserable results.

      Yeah, sure, incentivize your interchangeable drones to come to work earlier and enter a FIFO queue of interchageable work terminals. Looks great on paper.

      I can see several things happening. First, the obvious worst-case scenario is where people feel (justifiably so) that they are being treated like robots, and a sense of disatisfaction, isolation, and anger sets in. You'll never know if you're sitting next to the guy who's gonna go postal today.

      Second (and far more likely) the traditional type of social organization will start to impose itself on the system. People won't regard this arrangement in the nice, neat, theoretical way that management would like. People will exchange the possibility of a "better" cube for the *same* cube each day to provide continuity. There will be people who "save" cubes like people save seats in bars and churches (Theoreticly anybody could sit at Norm's seat at Cheers, but in practice, nobody does).

      Unless they are shift-workers, people will "mark their territory" and after a while people will start saying stuff like "oh, that's Jane's cube" if some other person tries to sit there.

      If management tries to deter this by enforcing a policy of cleaning cubes at the end of the day, the anger thing might happen, or people might bring "personality packs" that they set up and tear down at the end of the day.

      Then, management might have start forcing employees to log in at a different terminal each day, thus wiping away the last vestige of this territorial pack mentality.

      What of these packs? Well, there will be tribes of course. Over there in the corner, that's the JVM tribe, there's the sales tribe, the object modeling tribe, etc. Why would a salesman want to sit next to an object modeler? How do you know where to point the nerf gun if the territory keeps shifting? It would be like Afghanistan. Friendly nerf fire casualties could skyrocket until the system works itself out.

      Once the territories are established, leaders will emerge, hierarchies will form, etc. It's inevitable.

      The system they are describing, in and of itself, is not necessarily bad. It could in fact, be a much better framework in which to establish cliques and hierarchies than simply *assigning* places to people.

      However, if it's coupled with an attempt by management to overturn the normal social order, they are just wasting their time and actually making things worse. Nevermind all this network stuff. Face-time still matters. Your online friends and co-workers just aren't the same as people you actually have lunch with and throw things at.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    14. Re:Real brilliant. by cscx · · Score: 2

      This seems crazy and convoluted at best. Sun is acting like they invented the roaming profile. Companies have been using them for years.

      Personally I like having my own desk. Actually I have 2 desks, a fourth of a "team-style" mega-cubicle. The cubicles are arranged so that people on the same project sit together.

      My question to you about this whole fiasco is that who decides where you're meeting.. er.. moving for your next project? Should John come to your current desk and the rest of the team too? Or the other way around? Or are you just too lazy to walk?

      This is actually pretty dumb. People who do real work often have binders full of documentation, etc in binders at their desks. Tell me you're going to cart around those circuit boards you've been fiddling with and debugging all day from desk to desk. Yeah, right.

      I hope Scott Adams rips Sun a new one in the next few Dilberts :D

    15. Re:Real brilliant. by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Just three things to add...

      1) Although that little Java app that tells me where "John" is sounds cool, I wouldn't need to use it at all if I already KNEW where he was located! I'm still wasting time looking for "John" or the closest printer if I have to use this program to find them.

      2) I don't know about you, but I have FAR too much documentation at my desk to be able to carry it all with me. There is no way in hell that I can bring my 800+ page Java and SQL refrence guides with me whereever I go.

      3) You're royally screwed if your job requires a customized application that isn't compatible with version of the OS running on the terminal servers. So much for dual-booting Linux on your local workstation...

    16. Re:Real brilliant. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Sun took it a step beyond the 'roaming profile.' Sun makes the location of the worker be the office, as opposed to the office being the location of the worker.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    17. Re:Real brilliant. by kpansky · · Score: 1

      Argh! You stole _my_ sig! :)

      --

      --Kevin
    18. Re:Real brilliant. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Shut up and get out of my cubicle.

    19. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked situations like this, but not for very long, lol. The HR dept at my company has a bunch of those industrial psych people coming up with a different layout every few years. We've gone through private offices, hotels, cubes, shared offices, shared cubes, corners (you get half a cube - a corner of a X) and walkthroughs. We still haven't settled on a layout that has proven to make the company better, but we have proven that a few make the company worse - hotels and corners - our turn-over rates tripled with hotels, and doubled with corners, and the resulting gripe from most people having to work this way ended up getting "shared" to clients and resulted in lost buisness. Do your industrial psych research before you try these approaches, testing has proven (and I've verified) that both hotelling and corners are bad for your stock price.

    20. Re:Real brilliant. by shepd · · Score: 0, Troll

      >If his thin client catches on fire, it takes like 5 minutes to restore it.

      If a workstation sets on fire, you replace it with a backup workstation, pop in a ghost boot disk, and wait for the image to download (could be anything from 5 minutes to 10 hours depending on how crappy your network is :).

      >If you need help on an application, just take your smartcard to your co-workers desk and ask him to look at it

      In a company with standard software in the ghost images (which is how any company with more than a handful of computers should be managing the software on their workstations) all the computers have the same basic software. No need for smartcards.

      >And from an admin point, I just finished patching 20 boxes for known security holes. Wouldn't it be great to just patch one server?

      Seriously, take a look into Symantec Ghost and Zenworks. They'll save you so much time you'll hardly believe it!

      One image can serve for hundreds of computers. When you patch a computer all you'll need to do is update the image once (so that new ghost installs already have the fix) and push the upgrade onto clients with Zenworks.

      That's going to take you about the same amount of time as patching the server and testing it with a few clients.

      If you're worried about people saving their work onto their harddrives, tell them the harddrives are cleaned automatically every login (a little popup box that says its doing this will work wonders for re-inforcement) and that anything you want to keep for more than that session must be saved to the network drive.

      Software like DeepFreeze can not only stop 90% of workers screwing up their systems by installing crappy software, but it will also enforce your "don't save to the hard drive" policy. The other 10% who are smart enough to work around DeepFreeze are smart enough to listen to your "don't save to the hard drive" policy because they've seen you ghost machines, and they've seen hard drives crash.

      BTW: Bob takes more care of his computer when he knows that if it breaks he doesn't have a computer until its repaired!

      If your company requires Unix, a little work with NIS and NFS could do wonders (and ghost will still work, although there's always dd if you're desparate)...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    21. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The login process for each dumb terminal (with the swipe card) automatically sets your default printer to the nearest printer. It even routes your phone number automatically to the handset on your desk.

      Give each person their own cubical, and this is the default... without additional hardware and software!

      The brilliant bit is that you can pull your swipe card out, move to a different desk, put the card back in, and your entire desktop reappears without a single application lost. And your phone moved with you!


      I'd see this scenario happening often... "Gee, where is John today? Floor 2, B section? Floor 3, A section? I better give him a call first... Wait, did he say 2B-47A, or 2A-47B? Oops, better call him again..."

      You just click on the username and it shows the floorplan with John's current desk location highlighted.


      Unless John just up-and-moved, as you describe above. Then you'd have to log in to a nearby cubical youself to get an update on his location. If this happens just as he's looking for you....

      This system lets you move all the people in a specific project together, so you are sitting right next to the people you are working with. Two hours later you move to the next project on your list so you move near the people working on that project.

      Move every 2 hours? Are you nuts?

      Besides, do they move to me, or me to them? This causes more problems than it solves. Just have everyone meet in...lemme see... a MEETING ROOM??

    22. Re:Real brilliant. by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      An EFFICIENT workplace would be an employee strapped to a gurney with One of these in each eye, and food and waste going through tubes.

      Or would it just be an efficient way to lose employees to competitors, kind of like your idea?

    23. Re:Real brilliant. by asrb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In practise this encourages people to work out of their briefcases

      Uh, yeah. I have about 70 books in my office, a filing cabinet, and maybe a half dozen project binders. That's a big assed briefcase to haul around.

    24. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What??? Are you a really bad marketing rep who makes ambigous slogans? Isn't the whole point of this thing to make 'the office' be wherever the worker is?

    25. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun doesn't have anyone you can defend your need of anything to. Each level of management claims to be at the mercy of the level above them and with ten to fifteen levels of management above any given employee, the employees voice is almost always lost in the shuffle. Sun has changed drastically from a place where people are valuable professional gurus to a place where you are a glorified hamburger flipper. In most departments, innovation and boat-rocking is verboten because the only important thing is that the managing director of your group would rather skip just below radar and maintain his yearly bonuses (which their employees have been locked out of for a couple years now, thanks). There are some groups which are hardworking, innovative and a person is encouraged to rock the boat and be the best they can be, but Sun is quickly morphing into the kind of company that is buried in buzzwords, human resources and the marketing facades. If you want an example, look at the marketing decision to change the beautiful purple sun colors and use red yellow and blue instead. Their homepage and brochures look like puke now.

    26. Re:Real brilliant. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      but what we really want to know is - and we know you can tell us - how does McNealy's dick taste?

    27. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1) Although that little Java app that tells me where "John" is sounds cool, I wouldn't need to use it at all if I already KNEW where he was located! I'm still wasting time looking for "John" or the closest printer if I have to use this program to find them.


      Sun has how many thousands of employees? Chances are good that, in the traditional style, you DON'T know where he is located (especially if you are new on the job). In Sun's new style, chances are that, if you're working with "John", then he's sitting next to you (and the printer is just outside the group of cubicles you're in).


      2) I don't know about you, but I have FAR too much documentation at my desk to be able to carry it all with me. There is no way in hell that I can bring my 800+ page Java and SQL refrence guides with me whereever I go.


      If it's important to the job, then Sun should be supplying it either online or in a nearby library. If you need to refer to the reference manual every minute of the day, then maybe you aren't as good a programmer as you think you are. Or, if you are, then your manager should certainly see to it that the manual is there when you need it.


      3) You're royally screwed if your job requires a customized application that isn't compatible with version of the OS running on the terminal servers. So much for dual-booting Linux on your local workstation...


      This isn't Windows we're talking about. If you need a particular version of Unix, simply telnet to the server that has that version of Unix. If it's important to the project you're working on, then there will be such a server around.
    28. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is really brilliant.

      Riddle me this -- in an environment that you describe, why do the users need a full system sitting on their desk?

      I mean, if you're not going to let them "save to the hard drive", why do they need a hard drive on their machine? And, if you take away their hard drive, isn't it a thin client?

    29. Re:Real brilliant. by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2

      But it isn't! On a normal day you tend to work on dozens of projects. This system lets you move all the people in a specific project together, so you are sitting right next to the people you are working with. Two hours later you move to the next project on your list so you move near the people working on that project.


      Whats ironic about that statement is that you are touting a great networking capability for its ability to bring people physically proximate.


      Part of the idea of a network was that you could collaborate without being face to face. You can send these things called emails, you can share files over it, etc. Works great for me. I dont particularily want to be next to people who are going to be interupting me alot.

      Are you sure people are going to use this roaming ability for work? Maybe theyll just sit next to friends to socialize (apparent primary function of most business-types), which is the typical case for human self organizing systems. (see any school cafeteria) Coding particularily does not require long-protein exchange.


      In fact its possible to do a very good programming job without ever having seen the people you are working with in person. This roaming stuff seems all downside to me.

    30. Re:Real brilliant. by Derkec · · Score: 3, Insightful
      People who would benifit most from being in the same place day in and day out tend to not be impacted by this sort of program. Your engineering types will still have offices with thier names attatched more often than not. People who are frequently out of the office, either working at home or on the road selling stuff and are used to bringing their supplies and notes with them, are perfect canidates. Why have 10 desks for salesmen who are out of the office 50% of the time? Six or seven would probably be enough to go around.


      Basically, the folks at Sun aren't morons and won't try to impose this sort of chaos on people who will tend towards order. Instead they take the chaotic situation of people who are either moving around a lot or frequently on the road or at home and try to simplify that experiance. Prior to this system being in place, probably 5-10% of sun's offices were drop in offices. Anyone could use that space. The flexibility that gave folks was so appealing they enlarged the program to a new level for certain groups of people.

    31. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes. Its called The Matrix. And you thought it was just a movie.....

    32. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Sun is acting like they invented the roaming profile."

      Umm, they practically did. The Network Is The Computer, Unix workstations, NFS, etc etc.

    33. Re:Real brilliant. by KidIcarus · · Score: 1

      Sun took it a step beyond the 'roaming profile.' Sun makes the location of the worker be the office, as opposed to the office being the location of the worker.

      As long as the worker is located in the office, that is.

    34. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you love it when people debate themselves in circles? I'm thinking it should be a sport, possibly in the Olympics.

    35. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what abt the project groups, where all the guys are sitting at different corners and imagine the communication between them, no matter how advanced gadgets he uses, it will be a total chaos.

      Only brain damaged guys will go for this type of things.

    36. Re:Real brilliant. by vb.warrior · · Score: 1

      as much as i love the article " how to have sex with a computer" i really feel a womans perspective is in order, u will have to excuse the crap as i am blonde and very regulary have memory lapses, I also have very little knowledge on computers.

      however getting back to the point, the floppy disk drive despite the edges did u consider the size??i also feel that lubricant is quite possibly in order (one that won't damage the computer) I also think this site is for geeks, is it not? i know my boyfriend is who regulary reads the articles on this site, so therefore it must mean that u dont get out very often as u have very little knowledge on REAL SEX my real message that i want to put across is please please get out more and u to like so many others can enjoy the pleasures that only a woman can bring- yes to sex and no to cyber!!!!

    37. Re:Real brilliant. by groomed · · Score: 1


      2) I don't know about you, but I have FAR too much documentation at my desk to be able to carry it all with me. There is no way in hell that I can bring my 800+ page Java and SQL refrence guides with me whereever I go.


      Ever heard of this newfangled "Internet" thing?

      Or you just like to show off knowledge that isn't in your head?

    38. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is, but go one step further... switch to iButtosn instead of the overprices, overhyped, crappy smartcard. You can actually store FILES in a iButton (if you get a big enough one) and they are more convienent for the employees.

      I do agree, if there was a way I could switch every pc in the office to a terminal server (Linux of course, Citrix Metaframe is stupid and worthless based on microsoft's greed) I could get rid of 90% of the IT duties that take away from the real tasks.

      Damn, I knew it was smart to hold onto those Wyse 60 terminals....

    39. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the essential point of how Sun Rays work. There is no need for Ghost, for ghosted boot disks or for pushing updated images out to existing worksations with Zenworks or whatever - all of this is removed from the equation. You simply have a small number of servers to maintain. As a skilled sys admin, do you want to be wandering around the office, installing boot disks or lugging around replacement workstations? At Sun, replacing the desktop appliance is handled by the same people who do other buildings management. The sys admins are upstairs doing more useful things with their time.

      You also don't have the heat and space take up of PCs on the desk. You never need to upgrade the box on the desk, unlike with a PC - you simply add an extra server to the farm, or add some CPU or memory to your existing server.

      I'm not disputing that there are ways of taking a PC network and making it easier to manage, but you're still nowhere near the ease of managing a Sun Ray network.

      Sun recently added 500 new Sun Ray seats as a new building was opened in the UK - this involved a jumpstart on a new server, with facilities adding the Sun Rays to the desk. Bang - 500 new users added with minumum hassle. You wouldn't get that with a PC network!

    40. Re:Real brilliant. by ebh · · Score: 2, Funny

      The network may be the computer, but the network is not the stuff on my whiteboard, the pictures of my wife and son, my post-its, diagrams of various things tacked to my cube walls, and all the other little stuff that makes me bother to come in at all rather than work from home (where at least I have a door and a window).

      I worked without a desk for a year on one job. I was a contractor and the building was full, so I sat at desks of people on vacation. Let me tell you, not having your own space sucks, blows and regurgitates.

      If they tried to institute this where I work now, that printer that magically becomes my default because it's close to whatever cube the guy with the orange flashlights directs me to would be busy printing out copies of my resume.

    41. Re:Real brilliant. by mvdwege · · Score: 2
      Sun is acting like they invented the roaming profile. Companies have been using them for years.

      Uhh? Earth to Microshoft shill: Roaming profiles is an ugly hack to give a basically single-user system the same functionality Unix workstations had for years before that with NFS-mounted /home directories.

      You might also want to check whose name is on all NFS-related RFCs. FYI Sun was making networked workstations when Bill was still flogging BASIC and DOS.


      Mart (Who suspects he just got trolled)
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    42. Re:Real brilliant. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >As a skilled sys admin, do you want to be wandering around the office, installing boot disks or lugging around replacement workstations?

      Trust me, where I work we employ students to do this work, and it works beautifully for us. Its really a no-brainer once you get it "down pat".

      >At Sun, replacing the desktop appliance is handled by the same people who do other buildings management.

      Well, we save even more by getting students to swap PCs. Its really a simple job.

      >You also don't have the heat and space take up of PCs on the desk

      You can design that out of a PC with just a little work (see my other comment, which seems to have sparked some controversy!).

      >You never need to upgrade the box on the desk, unlike with a PC - you simply add an extra server to the farm, or add some CPU or memory to your existing server.

      This is true, but you can always run the PCs as dedicated X-Terms, which gives them 90% of the benefits of the SunRay (still not complete session saving, everything else works).

      >but you're still nowhere near the ease of managing a Sun Ray network.

      I think you'd be surprised how much simpler it can be to manage a PC network nowadays.

      Novell _really_ makes things easier than ever. Where I work we manage 30k+ accounts and 1500 stations with only a handful of IT staff (under 30). I'd be surprised if this were possible with all Sun workstations.

      >You wouldn't get that with a PC network!

      We add 3k to 10k accounts each year with ease as new students come in. You certainly can get that with a PC network! Its all automated -- new student info is entered into a mainframe, new account is created via batch jobs during the summer.

      We probably see 10-100 messed up accounts a year. Which is pretty good, considering the numbers.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    43. Re:Real brilliant. by JWW · · Score: 2

      Yeah, ghosting, thats the ticket.

      The sun ray with smart cards is so much better than ghosting it isn't even funny.

      I love hearing the users fuss and complain about their settings, and browser favorites, and desktop links, that aren't there anymore because you recovered a ghost image. And don't tell me you can ghost your users machines often enough to not run into this. Oh and keeping them from being able to make changes to the ghost image opens up a whole other can of worms.

      Also restoring a ghosted image could be fast but you're still talking at least minutes and possibly hours to less than a second with the sun ray.

    44. Re:Real brilliant. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I mean, if you're not going to let them "save to the hard drive", why do they need a hard drive on their machine?

      Because a hard drive is fast and cheap, unlike flash based local storage or network storage which can be fast but is normally never cheap.

      You save money and because it takes about 20 seconds to swap a failed hard drive when you use a caddy, you lose no reasonable time whatsoever (one can probably have the drive in the caddy pre-ghosted) fixing a broken hard drive.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    45. Re:Real brilliant. by archen · · Score: 1

      I like where I work too, but I'd give it up for a roaming profile if the damn phone wouldn't follow me.

    46. Re:Real brilliant. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I love hearing the users fuss and complain about their settings, and browser favorites, and desktop links, that aren't there anymore because you recovered a ghost image.

      Roaming profiles are your friend.

      >Also restoring a ghosted image could be fast but you're still talking at least minutes and possibly hours to less than a second with the sun ray.

      Maybe, but that assumes you have to ghost the new computer at the client's desk. You'd be best to do it in the shop days earlier (these are spare machines, ready to go right away, right?) with a base image. Tell the worker to pop in the auto boot disk for their area on lunch break and when they're back their computer is full of whatever software their department uses.

      Problems solved, and money still saved.

      The only benefit I see to Sun's solution that can't be easily replicated with current solutions is the ability to keep applications open between sessions. This isn't the big deal to most workers that many people on slashdot are making it out to be!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    47. Re:Real brilliant. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Apparently, as long as the worker has a sunblade, their smart card, and a pipe into the server farm. The joys of VoIP phones and the like. We were looking at doing this for our call center people; VoIP, VPN and a cable modem means that they can log into our network securely, have their phone calls automagically sent to them, and access the CSR app online. IM for communication with other CSRs, and it's all good.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    48. Re:Real brilliant. by JWW · · Score: 2

      First off, Roaming profiles suck, they are a pathetic workaround to what sun is doing here with the desktop and the smart terminals.

      Second, no matter what you do you still have to answer the users call about where their latest desktop wallpaper is and how to get the last five bookmarks back.

      All of the windows stuff (with the exception of terminal server) is a pathetic workaround to get you an envrionment that moves with you around the network.

    49. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. computer goes down.
      2. employee fills out trouble ticket on neighbors
      computer.
      3. employee tries to find second computer to fill
      in until IT techs show up.
      4. New computer arrives. half hour passes as system
      gets new image. another half hour passes as the latest
      MS patches that came out yesterday evening get applied.
      5. tech leaves.
      6. employee spends one hour getting new computer back
      the way they like it.

    50. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same poster with the typos from above.

      You could certainly attempt to oversimplify and jump to those conclusions. However, I omitted many details, and three years elapsed between the SunRay debacle and IBM's recent downsizing which finally trapped me.

      I did not leave Sun in a huff. It was a calculated and well considered move. However, one can convince onself to ignore many signs at work, hoping for a beneficial outcome. At Sun, that was contrary to the "writing on the wall." I was clever enough to keep my Ultra 10 while I was there to defend it and make lucent arguments for its value to an SA.

      But, as weak and faceless managers are wont to do, they instructed a minion to hoark it on offshift while I was on travel. That's spineless and poor morale inducing.

      I've had several successful years between then and now. I have contined to make over six figures during this tech blight. As such, my red ink stands out. I've survived several layoff rounds due to relative value and merit of my skill set. However, when the numbers of contractos are announced to be headed to zero, can anyone realluy be surprised? Again, seeing the writing on the wall, I have been prepared for this for months.

      So, Goober, though you undoubtedly thought yourself amazingly insightful for generating three remotely on topic sentences, your inductive reasoning is weak. I hope you fare better when you get out of school and into the meat grinder. And if you are already a "real" worker, I hope that you prosper and continue to make your $35,000 salary as an MCSE.

    51. Re:Real brilliant. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      What kind of programmer are you, then? All that information sitting around in analog form is decaying so fast I can hear it from here.

      The best part is, probably 95% of it is stuff you printed from digital documents that had you kept online in a project repository would not only be instantly updatable, but also under version control. This would mean that changes could be verified, and the documents easily shared.

      Let's not even discuss how difficult it is to back up a shelf full of paper, in case of disaster. Then there's the whole question of when you need to relocate to a different place for some reason (which as far as I can tell is a frequent occurrence).

      --
      I do not have a signature
    52. Re:Real brilliant. by anothy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked in a lab at Bell Labs where we formed a setup somewhat similar to this. we wanted it, and had to fight some to keep it when we moved, but we really like the model. basically, we had one large lab that we all spent the majority of our time in. before our move, everyone had an office, as well, but when that corridor was torn down for renovations and we had to move, we gave up our offices [1] to be allowed to tear down walls in the spot we were moving into to turn three mid-sized rooms into one large one. we set up desks with Plan 9 terminals (where there's nothing but a boot loader and swap space on local disk) around the perimiter of the room, a nice conference table in the middle, and a television (for demos and such) and couch at one end.
      [1] for a group of 6-8 people, we kept two offices. this was really useful for when you were doing work that required serious concentration, or if you had to make a private phone call. they were seldom used.

      the setup worked great. there were typically 4-6 people in the lab. the theory of being able to pick any terminal did slowly evolve into people having a "normal" terminal, where people would leave manuals and such. evey once in a while, you'd walk in and there'd be someone passed out on the couch (if you were a loud sleeper, you used one of the offices, which also had a couch in it). we had one guy who telecumuted from halfway across the country, and was on-site for one week a month; after the second visit or so, he stopped getting a hotel and lived out of the office (thankfully, we had showers in the basement). whenever someone walked in who wasn't normally there who wanted to show/ask us something, or who we wanted to show/ask something, she'd just log in and go.

      your reaction was not unheardof among people neighboring our odd lab. but you're describing very much a worst-case scenario, and is impacted by a number of factors, probably most strongly by how management (we pretty much managed ourselves, basically appointing one of us as an acting manager) treats it. in our lab, personal decorations were encouraged (everyone was expected to bring at least something in, and people hung a flag of choice around the perimiter of the ceiling - the lab quickly got the name "the Flag Room"). management needn't force people to move around, but should encourage people to sit by whoever they're working with at the moment. if you work with the same group of people on a long project, it makes sense you'll sit near each other for a good while. management should tell people not to do anything that prevents people from logging in at that terminal, though.

      the results of this sort of environment are that you form a stronger community with your co-workers, and you get all the beifits that go along with it. your code (or other work) is of better quality, because it's dramatically easier to say "hey, what do you think of this?" than it is when you even have to go to the cube next door. the two private offices recognize the occasional need for real privacy (which cubes don't give at all, despite the illusion of). you form a social bond with the people you work with, too, which is just sort of a nice side-benifit. and you tend to be right next to the people you're actively working with, moving to another lab to work with a different set of people (although there were only two like this in the building i know of).

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    53. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it isn't! On a normal day you tend to work on dozens of projects. This system lets you move all the people in a specific project together, so you are sitting right next to the people you are working with. Two hours later you move to the next project on your list so you move near the people working on that project.

      Lessee now... dozens of projects per day @ 2 hours per project. That comes out to ... ummm ... 48 hours/day?

      Anyone who works on dozens of projects a day is either a worthless parasite or a manager. (yeah, I know. -1 redundant)

    54. Re:Real brilliant. by legojenn · · Score: 1

      I would love to see if they could pull this off in my work environment. It's a legal environment (that is very overcrowded) in the government, and therefore most of the workers here are lawyers. Most of the tools that lawyers need are in electronic format. Statutes, caselaw, treaties, etc are all available on-line. Files are located centrally and can be retrived quickly. In addition, our lawyers tend to work in teams, and may on clients sites, on special projects and to be able to relocate in order to work together would probably be more efficient. It will be interesting to see if this could will in an IT setting and whether or not this could be transferable to an environment where the computer is just a tool rather than the focus.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    55. Re:Real brilliant. by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      The Network Is The Computer

      They were way ahead of their time with that little slogan.

      Of course, back in the 1980s, when my NFS mounts from down the hall failed because the network was down for some reason, I'd recite that slogan with glee to anyone who'd listen to my gripes.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    56. Re:Real brilliant. by loosifer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Novell _really_ makes things easier than ever. Where I work we manage 30k+ accounts and 1500 stations with only a handful of IT staff (under 30). I'd be surprised if this were possible with all Sun workstations.

      You know how everyone has been saying "Sun has been doing this for 20 years"? Well, it's because they have. Have you ever managed a Unix network? Have you ever compared them? Do you know where Novell got its inspiration to give you these abilities? Oh, that's right, Sun!

      I don't even need SunRays to beat that. If it took me more than about five people to manage 1500 workstations (not including managing the users) I would be pretty pissed; it's trivially easy to replace any of the physical workstations, of course, but it's also trivially easy to rebuild them over the network.

      Oops, did I say network? Yes, I did. Notice the total lack of mention of a "boot disk"; I'm not even sure what that is. I can rebuild a Solaris box in, oh, about 15 minutes over 100Mbit Enet. Without ever touching the stupid thing. And all of the actual applications and user data is stored on a central NFS server, so it's never lost and does not have to be copied to 1500 workstations.

      But wait, let's say I don't want to do that! Let's say that I don't feel like even having a local copy of the OS! I can even do _that_ without SunRays! I can netboot all of my workstations by default, and all I have to have is a decent NFS server. Then if there's ever a problem, the user just powers the stupid thing off, and powers it back on.

      You give power users local copies, as long as they understand that any local data (which _never_ includes /home) can and will be easily removed, and everyone else gets netboot.

      The reality is, spanky, if you are impressed by new technology which allows you to manage workstations, you are not using Unix and are not aware of Unix. The windows tools are still just a "ghost" of what Unix tools are available, and your stating that we just don't understand how easy it is now just goes to show that you don't understand how easy it has always been (at least since about 1986) for Unix admins.

      Servers, obviously, are a bit different, but that 's the case for both sides.

    57. Re:Real brilliant. by EllisDees · · Score: 2

      3) You're royally screwed if your job requires a customized application that isn't compatible with version of the OS running on the terminal servers. So much for dual-booting Linux on your local workstation...

      I don't think windows people understand the concept of X windows at all. You wouldn't have a 'local workstation', you'd be sitting at a machine that is strictly for displaying a screen. You can run your applications on whatever machine you want, and it can still display wherever you happen to be sitting.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    58. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the wild wild world of sports would any Unix/Linux or even Windows admin patch 20 individual boxes?

      >>Wouldn't it be great to just patch one server?

      With a little research this is quite possible, try cfengine, mount a single patch directory with NFS, Store you patch clusters there, run your install script and do some reading, research etc while the machine install their patches.

      Yes, a test machine/environment is good if time/resources exist. If you have a manager that doesn't want to at least *semi* automate patches, possibly think about ways to convince him/her that you have better things to do than walk around/login to 20 different machines and install individual patches.

      There are many ways to do this, common tools (cfengine) scripts (shell,perl,use expect) etc. I am not defending the dumb-terminal, no by no means is the terminal the one who is dumb here.

    59. Re:Real brilliant. by EllisDees · · Score: 2

      This is something that has boggled me for a while too. There is *nothing* you can find in a book that can't be found online faster. You are already sitting there and looking at the screen!

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    60. Re:Real brilliant. by kolding · · Score: 1

      Obviously from somebody who's never actually had a job.

      Jobs require books for reference. Documents provided by your outside contacts that you haven't scanned in (or aren't allowed to scan in). Toys are required to keep you sane (heck, my boss steals my slinky on a daily basis, helps keep him happy).

      It's also really nice to know where your coworkers are. Do you want to have to figure out where your boss is sitting if you have an important issue? What if the guy you working with is on the other side of the building today instead of next door?

      This is a stupid policy and is going to come back and bite Sun firmly in the ass.

    61. Re:Real brilliant. by bigjocker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are so full of it. I can see you have never done consulting or worked at 10's of projects at the same time. This environment is not designed for morons like you, it is designed for people who work in 10's of projects with 10's of different teams.

      I work for several projects and it's a pain in the butt every time I have to switch teams; you have to switch computers, make backups, arrange the desktop and check the new computer for sh*t left by the last user.

      This idea is just great, I wish my company would adop it.

      --
      Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
    62. Re:Real brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a statement! There is *nothing* that can be found in a book that cannot be found online faster. My books sit on a shelf two feet from my desk - are you saying that you can find page 36 of my manual before I can reach over and turn to page 36? You have been smoking some serious weed.

    63. Re:Real brilliant. by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

      Can personal cubicles be far behind?
      (That's a cardboard box over your head for non-Dilbert fans)

    64. Re:Real brilliant. by EllisDees · · Score: 2

      I guarantee that I can find whatever it is you need to find on page 36 just as fast as you can pick up that book and turn to page 36.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    65. Re:Real brilliant. by obtuse · · Score: 1

      Yes, it can be a pain in the ass for support staff, unless people can specify where they are well. As a rule, no-one bothers.

      I got messages from people whose email and voicemail was inaccessible (if they were too busy to check promptly I didn't feel too badly) but didn't tell me where they sat. If they knew anything, they gave useless locations because no-one in the offices knew North from South "I'm in the old BobaFett project space." Thanks. If I'd been on project BobaFett, I'd have an idea of where to look for you.

      I got messages like "My printer isn't working and this document has to go out in ten minutes!" I'm on my way, but what *building* are you in? What floor?

      The Sun version doesn't involve users lugging laptops around, but having a functional workstation everywhere. Once you have your laptop toting users unplugging workstations to connect, plugging the monitors into their laptops, and disconnecting the phones to plug in their headsets, it all goes to hell.

      --
      Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    66. Re:Real brilliant. by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      Do you know what a Shift key is?

    67. Re:Real brilliant. by fscking_coward_2001 · · Score: 1

      I guarantee that I can find what's on page 36 in a book not available online faster than you can get it delivered in hard copy from your favorite online bookstore. Sometimes, we need the actual reference rather than similar information in another reference book - when quoting, for example. I'll agree that much of what I need to lookup is online, but I would not agree to a blanket statement that everything I need is available online.

    68. Re:Real brilliant. by RustyTaco · · Score: 1

      Uh, they get up and move closer together. That's the whole point.

      - RustyTaco

    69. Re:Real brilliant. by sclatter · · Score: 2

      The downside is that your pens and manuals don't move with you. In practise this encourages people to work out of their briefcases, which is convenient for techs who spend most of their time onsite.

      I've heard stories of failed attempts at hotelling workers. Basically, the experiment came to a screeching halt when it was discovered that employees were solving their storage problems by keeping critical and confidential papers in the trunks of their cars.

    70. Re:Real brilliant. by billcopc · · Score: 1

      2B or not 2B, that is the question.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    71. Re:Real brilliant. by sphealey · · Score: 2
      Everything should be able to be done on the terminal and require no paper or anything that would even require a file cabinet.
      Well, you might want to read this article from The New Yorker. The author gives a very convincing explanation of why the "clean desk" idea works for a few people, but not for most.

      Personally, while I find it very efficient to search for things on-line, I find that when it comes to actually reading and absorbing the information so found, ink on paper (aks "dead trees") is about 10 times more efficient than a CRT.

      sPh

    72. Re:Real brilliant. by reverius · · Score: 1

      The shift key doesn't work in Plan9 OS. j/k

      Actually, I'd have tried it by now if Plan9 would boot (without problems) on any of the three computers I've tried it on...

    73. Re:Real brilliant. by anothy · · Score: 1

      that's a shame; it really is quite nice. VGA card issues? that's the most common problem, by far.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    74. Re:Real brilliant. by anothy · · Score: 2

      //Do you know what a Shift key is?

      yup. it's that thingie that lets me type double quotes, parens, and the like. why, whadda you use it for? :-)

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    75. Re:Real brilliant. by reverius · · Score: 1

      One two machines (out of the three) it was VGA card issues (The cards are not supported). I tried to use one, and it made my LCD screen do very wierd things, so I haven't tried it again.

      On the other machine, I actually did get it up and running once (after specifying an IRQ for my network card) but haven't had much interest in trying it on only one computer, b/c I wanted to use that one as a CPU server for my laptop...

      I think I'll wait and see if any more VGA cards are supported down the road.

    76. Re:Real brilliant. by packeteer · · Score: 1

      well i see you added more... are they open sigs? can i borrow some?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    77. Re:Real brilliant. by packeteer · · Score: 1

      ok well first of all i dont get paid... as i said i go to high school where i am supposed to be learning... second of all if i WAS in a ob i dont think my boss would appreciate the following conversation:
      me: "hey i got this hacker stuff i want you to read and adopt as your plan for administratin this office"
      boss: *just stares*
      ...
      later that day
      me: "wtf is this... raise REJECTED??? wtf... damn this sucks"

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  3. 500$ terminal? by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1

    It mentioned in the article that each terminal cost 500$. 500$ for a dumb terminal? Thats pretty expensive, one could buy an entire pc for that price... but then again its sun hardware.

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    1. Re:500$ terminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go to http://store.sun.com and click on thin client. Full gui, sound, usb, etc. I think it is worth it, but it might suck to get stuck with the office that has gum in the terminal keyboard for a day.

    2. Re:500$ terminal? by Octorian · · Score: 2

      $500 for a SunRay, which is a totally stateless networked keyboard+mouse+graphics+audio. There's nothing to break, nothing to upgrade... Almost no upkeep costs.

      In short, they ONLY have to actually worry about maintaining the back-end, not the front-end.

    3. Re:500$ terminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SUn Ray (codename "Corona") is a solid state computer. No local storage save for a flash reader and NVRAM.

      However, it really works very well at its task. 110BTX onboard, 24-bit 3x buffered video, USB KB & Mouse, 44KHz audio in and out. video out. immediately hot swappable.

      I have played MPEG3 movies over the network on long shifts, even with opaque drag on, and almost no frames dropped. I have worked on a cluster with 400 concurrent users and still had a peppy CDE session with Star Office and xmms.

      Still, for a sysadmin, not having your own tools, local root, traceroute and local storage is BS. SunRay is fine for data entry clerks or university word processing labs. But it is not every professional's best tool choice, Mr. McNealy.

    4. Re:500$ terminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing to break...

      You don't have much experience with public facilities, do you?

      Computer labs, public toilets, rental cars... you name it. Anything that gets used by a large number of people, with no one directly accountable, gets fucked up. See also "Tragedy of the Commons".

      I'll give these boxen an average lifespan of 2 months or less.

    5. Re:500$ terminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CORRECTION:

      THE $500 PRICE IS VERY WRONG...

      The actual price of a SunRay 1 is $399.00 retail
      with no discount.

      SUN DOESN'T PAY RETAIL FOR IT'S OWN EQUIPMENT!

      The internal price of a SunRay is well below
      $200.

      Use your brains for once dim bulb! Geeesh

    6. Re:500$ terminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >I'll give these boxen an average lifespan of 2 months or less.

      Then sadly for you I must inform you that you
      are already WRONG. Sun has been using over 16,000
      SunRay's internally for the last two years
      inside the company. And very succesfully.

      This Yahoo article is nothing new for Sun. They
      have been doing it as part of an on-going
      program for several years.

      SunIR typically supports 100 SunRay's per
      10-way server with redundancy. I was very happy
      to have one in my office and get rid of that
      noisy fan and heat producing Ultra I used to
      have.

      You can keep your heat and noise making machines...PC's and all...They suck!

    7. Re:500$ terminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha ha.... what were you, one of the extras in the 1984 ad?

  4. The way some companies do it by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 0, Troll

    I remember hearing about some companies that had very open buildings. Each employee would have a computer on a rolling cabnet. They could move it around to wherever it suited them. This allowed people to group depending on what projects they were doing, and then re-group for the next one. It seem innovative to me. Sun could modify their 'dumb' setup a little and make it more efficent. Example: Bob from accounting needs a simple computer to do spreadsheets, etc. Brenda from Marketing needs something with more graphics capabilities for banner ads. So issue each employee at sun equipment comparable to their job. The mobile workstation Idea makes sense because of project grouping, but also prevents those office disagreements from getting to bad (move across the building).

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:The way some companies do it by magicslax · · Score: 1

      you said:

      Sun could modify their 'dumb' setup a little and make it more efficent. Example: Bob from accounting needs a simple computer to do spreadsheets, etc. Brenda from Marketing needs something with more graphics capabilities for banner ads. So issue each employee at sun equipment comparable to their job.

      The cool thing about a server/dumb terminal model is that none of the client terminals need to have anything beyond basic capabilities. Anything besides input and display is handled quite capably (in theory anyway) by the server. Data storage and processing occurs on Ye Olde Giant Box.

      That rolling cabient thing sound extremely cool. ;-)

    2. Re:The way some companies do it by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alas, but in practice, Brenda in Marketing NEEDS the graphics card right in her terminal, or else she needs a Fibre connection to the server.......

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    3. Re:The way some companies do it by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Uh....Brenda in Marketing has a good resolution (and typically LARGE) graphics screen, and a dedicated 100bT full duplex link to the server. Where does this alleged need for fibre come from?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:The way some companies do it by bareminimum · · Score: 1

      you said:

      The cool thing about a server/dumb terminal model is that none of the client terminals need to have anything beyond basic capabilities. Anything besides input and display is handled quite capably (in theory anyway) by the server. Data storage and processing occurs on Ye Olde Giant Box.

      From the original post:
      Brenda from Marketing needs something with more graphics capabilities for banner ads.

      Sounds like a graphic card could do lots here. Sounds like the Olde Giant Box gets onto some Limitationz here my friend.

      Nice theory.

    5. Re:The way some companies do it by caferace · · Score: 1
      Brenda from Marketing needs something with more graphics capabilities for banner ads.

      Sounds like a graphic card could do lots here. Sounds like the Olde Giant Box gets onto some Limitationz here my friend.

      Huh? The wench is making banner ads, ferchrissakes. Give her a windows box and hope it never gets beyond safe mode.

    6. Re:The way some companies do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Where does this alleged need for fibre come from?

      Because updating 10k x 10k pixel 32 bit images doesn't happen in real-time over 100 baseT, but does happen real-time on RAM-FrameBuffer/Fiber-Framebuffer transfers.

    7. Re:The way some companies do it by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      Banner ads were a quick example of something graphics-oriented that I used to show the limitation of the Terminal-Server system. A more apt example would have been editing marketing videos, as this would have completely required more then the standard 'dumb' terminal

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    8. Re:The way some companies do it by Jonny+290 · · Score: 1

      Show me a fucking 10k by 10k pixel 32 bit banner ad. A simple link will be sufficient.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    9. Re:The way some companies do it by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given that it's Sun we're talking about, I hardly think these are Ye Olde Green Screen Terminals. We're talking X Terminals here.

      And since the X Window System is quite able to serve different displays simultaneously, I would think that different workers needing different graphics capabilities is no problem whatsoever.

      At least at home my desktop system has no problems serving a 1280x1024x32 display to my monitor and a 1024x768x16 to my laptop simultaneously. I expect Sun to have a little more powerful hardware, but the basic concept is the same.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    10. Re:The way some companies do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has already been pointed out banner ads will be no different coming from disk or the network. 250k maybe takes .25 seconds, there's no way a local disk would improve on that.

      I've seen SunRay's demo'ed playing back full screen video; yank the card and stick it into another machine and the video resumes without a single lost frame. Of course it depends on the resolution of the video, but how many people in most business's are editing high resolution video? Banks frequently have thousands of employee's and probably every last one of them could use a sunray without problem.

      I don't think anyone would expect Pixar to use dumb terminals exclusivly...

    11. Re:The way some companies do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh, the marketing department *EDITING* the videos? what kinda marketing department do you jokers have?

    12. Re:The way some companies do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said it was a banner ad? Amazingly enough, some things still actually get printed -- on real paper and everything! -- and some of them start out that size.

      If you have an organization of essentially equivalent droids, especially if they're spending lots of time outside the office, this should work fine. But as others have pointed out, people will figure out ways to work the system so they get some level of stability out of their work environment. Then it's pictures on the desks and everything else.

    13. Re:The way some companies do it by bcaulf · · Score: 1

      It will not be sufficient... There really is a Brenda in Marketing who edits images, maybe also video and 3D. She uses the hardware acceleration in her video card to make her session run at the rate to which she has become accustomed. She doesn't use a simple framebuffer on her current PC. What makes you think that a framebuffer with a relatively low-bandwidth high-latency connection to the CPU will suffice for her?

      I really like the terminal model but it is not appropriate for every person in the enterprise. You cannot give someone a much slower computer than what they are using and have them accept it. The Sun Ray system was not built to compete with a high end graphics performance PC/workstation. A Sun Ray is not going to do it for the graphic professionals, not now, not ever. They will leave the company en masse.

      SGI does sell some network terminal graphics systems that run fast, but they ain't Sun Ray.

  5. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but have they patented the idea yet?!

  6. Maturity? by alouts · · Score: 1
    Sun also has its own word processing and office suite, called Star Office, which it has begun selling, instead of it giving away, in a sign of maturity for the Microsoft Office rival.

    After reading Slashdot for the last couple years, I've always been told it was more mature to embrace free software and accept it as inevitable than try and actually sell something you've built. :)

    In all seriousness though, this means that people's workspaces change pretty dramatically, having no personalization. Also, management becomes a bit different when you don't really know where your employees are sitting on any given day. No longer is "management by walking around" a possibility.

    I don't think the return of the mainframe/fat server model is necessarily a bad thing, but it doesn't need to go hand in hand with a hotel/no permanent desk model.

    I'd bet that within a few months, they will abandon the no real desk policy, but the dumb terminal thing may work well for them.

    1. Re:Maturity? by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      No longer is "management by walking around" a possibility.

      But maybe "management by remotely spying on your computer screen" is a possibility.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Maturity? by elmegil · · Score: 2
      Also, management becomes a bit different when you don't really know where your employees are sitting on any given day. No longer is "management by walking around" a possibility.

      1) there's a system to view who is sitting where (at least what they've reserved, they may not actually be in the seat at any given moment). Very handy when you want to find Joe SE to talk to him about the account, not just when you're Joe's manager.

      2) while there are no assigned cubes, it's common to have "neighborhoods" where a given group tends to congregate. So if I want to talk to one of the SE's on a particular account, I know where they usually hang out; if that doesn't work, see 1).

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  7. Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by jpellino · · Score: 3, Funny

    They tried this a while back - get to work, go to a window, get your laptop and cell phone, head off to work in your 'office', the caf, outside, etc. They ditched it after finding it was hell to find anyone to have a meeting, which is still necessary no matter how much cyber you want to throw at a situation. One manager had a two-around rule - if he had to walk around the campus twice to find someone he needed, screw them - go on to something workable.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what instant messaging is for. Just send out a message telling everyone to meet in some conference room at such and such a time. Either that or just use IM for the conference online.

    2. Re:Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yep, check out this Feb. '99 Article "Lost in Space" in Wired.

      Locally, at the University I work at, a research group tried this and it failed, in part because faculty and students have really different modes of operation. Faculty spend most of their time in meetings with students, and tend to do their real thinking offsite. Students need a consistent and quiet place to work. So, the faculty enjoy walking around and running in to students, but students just want to show up to the same desk and pick up where they left off.

      Too bad no one at Sun reads Wired.

      Having my entire operation on a laptop sure makes it easier to migrate between home and office. If
      Sun made laptops (remember Voyager?), then they would probably embrace what pretty much everyone else has: Give people laptops, fast home access,
      good applications support, VPN etc.

      One side advantage: I'm much easier to reach by phone when at home then when I'm at work in a building with notoriously poor cell phone connectivity.

    3. Re:Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That's what instant messaging is for. Just send out a message telling everyone to meet in some conference room at such and such a time.

      "I can't make it. I'm at home."
      "I can't make it. I at the other building."

      Departments need to be together, that's what offices are for.

      >IM for the conference online

      There's so many ways that won't work it isn't worth arguing against any further.

    4. Re:Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I used to work for the guy who came up with it (after he left Chiat/Day). He had a lot of bad management ideas, actually.

    5. Re:Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by Jonny+290 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Oh, yeah, RIGHT. Like IM is going to get anything done.
      Chat log for room InterfaceProgramming4053

      GeorgeCEO: don't fuck with me man
      GeorgeCEO: i'll kill you fucker
      LunixGuru: I WILL HACK YUOR AIM!
      SusieSecretary: a/s/l?
      LunixGuru: FUCK YUO BIATCH
      JimJanitor: HOT GIRLS PRESS 123 NOW
      SusieSecretary: 123123123123
      GeorgeCEO: slut
      LunixGuru: I need a faster computar
      LunixGuru: My Windows XP 2000 NT machine is slow
      GeorgeCEO: work harder you dumb shit
      GeorgeCEO: i'll kill yuo and your mothar
      SusieSecretary: Anybody want hot chat?
      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    6. Re:Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, Sun is managed by morons who, in not knowing history, are doomed to repeat it.

      Couldn't happen to a nicer company in my opinion though... except perhaps M$.

      Anyone want to try and convince Bill that this is the way to go for M$? :)

    7. Re:Go ask Chiat/Day about the reality of this... by beamdriver · · Score: 1
      Yes, this was the first thing I thought of when I read this story. Here's a link to the story in that ran in Wired Magazine back in February of 1999.

      Remember when there were interesting stories in Wired? It seems like another lifetime ago.

  8. Do we need this? by jammer+4 · · Score: 1

    With all the software for monitoring a worker's machine, and all the work thats been done with distibuted software management (Novell Zenworks for example), don't we already have enough options for avoiding going back to dumb terminals, while still maintaining an easy to manage computer network system?

    1. Re:Do we need this? by elmegil · · Score: 1

      It's not about monitoring, it's about centralized resources. I know several people who prefer to have their slice of a reasonably sizeable server instead of the Ultra 1 they'd probably still have on their desk if they had their own dedicated machine. Not me of course. :-)

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  9. We had this when I was a kid... by bubblegoose · · Score: 5, Funny

    they called it musical chairs

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    1. Re:We had this when I was a kid... by Fastball · · Score: 2

      This is a poor idea for several reasons. First, there are a fixed number of terminals and a fixed number of employees, right? So what's to stop the same people from using the same terminals day after day? Kind of like college classrooms. Nobody tells you where you have to sit, but you kind of get used to sitting in the same seat every class meeting. Second, I suspect this would hinder productivity. The ability to customize one's workspace should not be underestimated. I for one don't want to hunker down in a blank, beige cubicle. People like their family photos, clocks, disco balls, etc.

  10. It's a good idea by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    God knows that these lusers are predisposed to interacting with dumb things. Dumb TV. Dumb spouses. Dumb coworkers. Dumb terminals.

    It only makes sense.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  11. You work for Sun don't you? by gnovos · · Score: 2

    first post...

    The system only works at Sun. Here at slashdot getting in early doesn't get you a better spot.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  12. mixed feelings.. by bje2 · · Score: 1
    i have mixed feelings about this...

    Sun says will save it $150 million annually, and the program is essentially an advertisement for the company's marketing pitch that business runs better on a network of big computers than smaller boxes powered by software from rival Microsoft Corp.
    i like this idea very much, both because it saves the company money and is a much better (as they said) then every employee having their own stuff on their own personal computers...this way employees can get information from other employees much easier...i mean, you ever run into the problem when Employee X is out one day, but has some data that you need on his laptop that isn't at work...that kinda thing would be eliminated by this "floating" network workspace initiative... now, to play devil's advocate...

    The lack of personality at Sun, however, was troubling to Martin Bechtold, Assistant Professor of Design Technology at the Harvard Design School, who said he believed people needed the chance to personalize their offices -- even if he did not have studies to prove so one way or another.
    this is the bad side of the idea to me...at my desk at work, i have several assorted programming books, pictures of friends and family, my walkman, a dilber calendar, a rubik's cube, etc...with this kind of floating workspace, that kind of personal touch to your office would be eliminated...

    plus, what if i wanted to go visit Employee X in person? i guess i would have to call them first, to find out where they are on any given day...also might make "stopping by" the desk of any female employees to try in vain to flirt a little more difficult...
    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:mixed feelings.. by Grax · · Score: 1

      Sun: Stopping sexual harassment by making the honey's desks impossible to find.

      I do like the idea in that if my "computer" is broke the tech guy can toss a new one in in 15 minutes (if he's slow). Presuming the server side of things is hefty, stable, and operated by sysadmins dedicated to uptime.

    2. Re:mixed feelings.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has the campus computer room feel to this...

    3. Re:mixed feelings.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but how much of that saving was because of Sun getting its system (since they own them) much cheaper that any other company would get. I remember three articles hanging up in the NCR offices about Sun's beliefs dating back in 1995 about large central computers replacing small and difficult to manage desktop computers.

      It was crap back then and its crap now. Systems change - small changes you can work through people (say moving from open spaces to cubes to team cubes) while large changes are resisted (own PC/desk to virtual desks). If Sun would simply take small steps this might move, but Sun is just too "Kill MS at all costs" orientated to do something productive.

    4. Re:mixed feelings.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an easy solution to some of those problems. You put a CD player and headphones in each cube. You probably already have the CD on the terminal. Also, you just put a Dilbert calendar and a few Dilbert cartoons in each cube. That's 75% of the problem solved!z

  13. Officeless offices failed at Chiat/Day by dws · · Score: 3, Informative
    An article in Business 2.0 covers the history of the officeless office experiment at Chiat/Day. It didn't go so well.
    The end result was predictable: People began working out of the trunks of their cars in frustration, or just staying home. Fifteen months later, Chiat sold his agency and resigned. By 1998, the agency had abandoned the building. "This issue of giving people their personal space is a major one," Chiat says now. "I assumed that everyone would buy into the virtual office concept because it's so logical. But it's counter to everybody's emotional position. After a while I didn't have the energy to try and change that."

    1. Re:Officeless offices failed at Chiat/Day by dws · · Score: 1

      Oops. Bad link. here is the Business 2.0 article.

    2. Re:Officeless offices failed at Chiat/Day by elmegil · · Score: 2
      or just staying home

      In this day of VPN and common if not ubiquitous broadband, staying home is just as effective at doing the job many times.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Officeless offices failed at Chiat/Day by cascadefx · · Score: 2
      There was a really good article on the same topic from Wired magazine a few years back.

      Check out Lost in Space for some of the bizarre goings on. And it wasn't all related to management and space issues.

    4. Re:Officeless offices failed at Chiat/Day by symbolic · · Score: 2

      I remember seeing something about this in a PBS documentary. I think this disaster can be applied to other environments (like software engineering), as it illustrates the vast difference between what we think we know, and the reality associated with people being, well, people.

  14. Chiat-Day tried this 7 years ago, and failed big by GGardner · · Score: 2
    There was a wired article about how the advertising company Chiat-Day started the "hot desk" concept.

    Not coincidentally, the company tanked soon after this started, and had to be sold in order to survive. In their new offices, traditional offices are the rule of the day.

  15. LOL!!! Dilbert !!! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dilbert comic from 1995 January 09.

    Scene: A staff meeting is in progress...

    PHB With Diagram: We're taking away your cubicles. In the new system you'll sign up for whatever cube is open that day.

    PHB: It's based on the model of public restrooms. But I call it "hotelling" because it increases my chances of getting tips.

    PHB: Each cubicle will have a computer, a chair, and a roll of note paper ... take on and pass it around. [Hands out notepaper roll which looks like toilet paper roll.]

  16. DISCOVERS? by elmegil · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Come on I thought this was supposed to be NEWS. Sun's been doing this for, oh, about 3 years now. Some do fine, some hate it (raises hand). Here's an interesting thought for ya though: how much do you think all that dedicated office space for people who are supposed to be at customer sites selling or servicing equipment would have added to the pain of the last two years since the bubble burst?

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  17. Very Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a lot to be said for folks not futzing/personalizing their machines. Support issues go away. Users who play with their machines are support nightmares.

    Life's just easier if you can sit with the folks that you're working with, and if that changes from week to week; why bother being chained to a desk.

    That said... How the heck am I supposed to call you? Or are we just IM'ing now? hahaha

  18. Showing up early? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    Get In Early, Get A Good Office

    "'You come in early, you get a good a parking space, you get a good office.' Chief Executive Scott McNealy has summed up the iWork program. "

    Interesting idea, as you show up earlier to get a nice seat by the window/cooler. But what could be the disadvantages of having a roaming system of seats?

    For starters, you can't really put many personal belongings around you, your workspace feels less personal. I think Sun's offices would feel less friendly, unless they had a lot of company parties to make up for it.

  19. Sun Rays and remote X by doorbot.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend of mine works at Sun and gave me a tour a little while back. The building itself was an interesting structure, and of course the computer systems were an experience in themselves.

    The server rooms, conference rooms, and most offices had 24" monitors connected to Sun Ray 1 machines. My friend showed me how he could put his smart card in, and then it would ask him for his password, and he was logged into the exact same desktop that he had in his office. So whatever he was working on "followed" him around. Granted, it was just a remote X terminal, but I thought it was cool.

    And I'm sure there's those of you who say, "it's been done before" or "that's old tech" but as servers get more powerful, and workstations become smaller, quieter, and dumber, it was cool to see this "old tech" being put to (damn) good use.

    While my friend did have his own office, as did everyone else at that particular campus, it could be an interesting management experiment (if you want to call it that) to rotate people's desks around... maybe every month. That way, if people have a problem with coworkers, you can separate them, and that way everyone can get to know everyone else... and the new people don't feel so alienated. Of course, when you have roaming profiles, or dumb terminals, that makes things that much easier.

    1. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by mattdm · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're not remote X terminals. They're remote frame buffers -- they don't even have the brains of an X term.

    2. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by pdice · · Score: 1
      I must be missing something. So, no one has any personal cube anymore, but is there any advantage to the employee?

      There was something in the article about you being able to work at a certain office two days a week, but did i read that wrong? What's the point of working at an office an hour south of the city? Do people get to telecommute more or something, or does this just save money somehow for the company?

    3. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by elmegil · · Score: 1
      is there any advantage to the employee?

      Sun is still in business.... :-)

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

      If you have a job where you tend to move from project to project, the hotelling arrangement is easier, because you get to work with the people on your project.

      In our company, we tend to stake out a corner and sit near each other. I've sat at the same desk for a month or two.

      It's better than before, when one co-worker was on the other side of the floor and another was three floors up.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    5. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My university has employed the Sun Ray system for 2 years now. It is two things: User hell. The systems are really slow. Our university has two 16 processor servers running this system. At about, oh, 20 users it becomes nearly unusably slow. My PII 233 outpaces this system on single-threaded code. Management hell. When something goes wrong with this system, it goes really wrong. The boxes take 20 minutes to boot up, so when it's down, it's down for at least 30 minutes, and that means your whole computer system is down for those 30 minutes. We have redundancy at our university, but one of the boxes never worked right from the start. Some apps still won't run on it (Opera for one).

      I have one thing positive to say about these computers: presentations. There's something cool about making your presentation and loading it all up and pulling out your smart card and then going to where your going to give your presentation and putting in the card and there it is ready to go. No waiting. Then you go and give the presentation and it takes 10 seconds to change slides because they're so slow.

      The one last thing I have to mention about these systems is that they are not worth the money. You can fill an office with PCs for LESS money and then users have a system that they know and can use. I've seen people with these systems as novices. They are completely clueless. It's much better not to expect the public to relearn an OS. Yes, I know, windows is bad, but for office use, when that's what everyone knows, you really need to go that way. My school bought 700 terminals to the tune of $600 a piece. About 70 are in use and if more that 20 people are logged into a computer it's too slow to use. Sun claimed 700 users could use ONE server and we have 2 that breakdown after 40.

    6. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by slam+smith · · Score: 1

      So what happens when you show up to work at 7:30 and try and take your good seat and some guy says, "I'm saving these 20 seats for my buddies who come later, we're starting a new project". I mean do you get pissed off. Or is it de facto your cube because you always sit there and people know not to sit in your "cube"?

    7. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No. I've worked at Sun for a number of years and every employee I know (including almost all contractors from agencies) have offices. Not cubes. Offices. I don't have one, but that's because I telecommute from another state.

      Not sure what the 24" monitors and SmartCards refer to, because nobody I've ever known has had one and no conference rooms have the monitors either. You do have a normal badge to get into the building like everyone else in the world and you do have an encrypted card system for logging in remotely through a VPN but that's it.

      If you're more of a sales type person you can probably work from remote offices most of the time on whatever machine is available, but these are not the rule. These are the exceptions. If you go into any of the expensive new sun buildings in Santa Clara where the old hospital used to be, every building has hundreds and hundreds of *offices* and in each office sits an individual and only that individual uses the office. Walls, doors and everything. The doors are *sliding* doors but nonetheless... whatever the designers were thinking on that one I'll never figure out.

      So yes some people are more nomadic either because they have a job where they can't really afford to be tied down to one desk in one building in one part of the country and need to move around or they are someone who works from a remote office due to traffic and so forth half the time... But the vast majority of people (and I'm thinking 90 percent at the bare minimum) do the normal office thing.

      A lot of people in engineering positions telecommute but that is largely dependant on your managers attitude. Some are uptight fascists who want you to sit at a desk at the head of the class so they can feel mighty and powerful and haven't been hit by a cluebyfour yet while others couldn't give a flying fuck as long as you are good at what you do and are a productive person. Most telecommuters I know at the company put in the extra 3+ hours they would spend traveling toward doing even more work.

    8. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2
      While my friend did have his own office, as did everyone else at that particular campus, it could be an interesting management experiment (if you want to call it that) to rotate people's desks around... maybe every month. That way, if people have a problem with coworkers, you can separate them,

      We did this in high school!

      Wow, the corporate world becomes ever more domineering. Whatever happened to leaving people alone to do their jobs... Sun doesn't hire just anyone
    9. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um .. I work for sun - and this is actually pretty cool - it gives you the option to either sit near people you're working with, or find a remote office corner and hide if you've got a lot to do and don't want to be bothered .. the tricky part is trying to track down people and see if they're actually in the office or not and since most of the time we're out at customer sites, you're taking everything with you anyways.

      a couple comments on the setup - in our local field office (FFO) we've got about 50-70 people running off a single E6500 - works fine as long as there's no power or network problems (as is generally the case everywhere I've been.) The SA is a couple of states away which is great (probably better) - we tend not to need him as most of us can do the local SA work, and more of his job is in monitoring the network and usage quotas. For working-in-the-office days, you simply log into your phone and plug your card in, and you're set - obvioiusly when you go to remote offices, you'd either have to request a remote login for that site, or you can pull across the network (but pulling an X desktop across a couple 100ms lag is no fun, not to mention the network congestion.) Personally I like it - have my own roll-around cabinet, and a file drawer - have my team that I deal with, and typically can find either a cubby-hole office or hang out with the rest of the team in the swamp area/team room we've kinda claimed (teams tend to migrate to different areas of the building and people are quite flexible) - we've got an office manager who kindly helps to enforce the rules who has her own office and is easy to find (that helps with continuity) - and there's a few people who tend to camp in the same area .. conference rooms are pretty flexible and easy for pulling people together. In general this seems to work pretty well up to a certain number, and you'll find that building will naturally be divided into those sections - managers, or people with a need for many conferences are generally given priority on the larger offices with desks .. I mean it's an office - having a different view of the world from day to day is kinda nice.

      The SunRays are decent, and with my linux laptop - I can just dhcp and xfer files back and forth to the server .. the nice wide screen is fine, and most everything we do is between email and internal websites/applications so there tends to be very little local load - doing presentations and reports are pretty easy and since everything is saved centrally - I can pull the reports from my VPN at home, or even across the web portal (in an emergency since it's often problematic) at a customer site.

      Time in the office is generally just for face-to-face mtgs or when you feel like you're isolated - most of the meetings are dial-in concalls with teams spread across the country(ies) - slides are put on the intranet if you need them .. cutting real-estate costs with spread out virtual teams makes sense to me - since most people are out of the office working, doesn't resource consolidation make sense? .. I mean didn't sourceforge teach us something about how spread out teams can collaborate effectively as long as they had a common resource area to stash/share files and send/receive mail?

    10. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by CoolVibe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I used to work on Sun Rays too, at this place. Usually I used my newfound mobility with the Sun Rays to get *away* from annoying coworkers so I could get some work done :)

      This technology has been around for a while though... I sure digged it. It's really easy when you need help from a collegue: You just rip his card out of the sunray and pop yours in. There, now he's sitting behind your desktop, looking at your problem. Very handy.

    11. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by MadKeithV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but as servers get more powerful, and workstations become smaller, quieter, and dumber,

      When did that happen?
      Did I miss something?

      *checks under the desk*

      Nope, that machine there is DEFINATELY smarter than my previous one. Smaller, yes. Quieter, not yet a priority, but because of the way I've positioned it now, yes. Dumber? No bloody way. Moore's Law.

      Decentralisation is what made the internet so big. Now Sun is indeed the O in Old Economy, what's next, steam engines?

    12. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by goliard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it could be an interesting management experiment (if you want to call it that) to rotate people's desks around... maybe every month. That way, if people have a problem with coworkers, you can separate them, and that way everyone can get to know everyone else... and the new people don't feel so alienated. Of course, when you have roaming profiles, or dumb terminals, that makes things that much easier.

      Uh, or you could just issue everyone laptops, and have them pick up and move.

      Forrester Research has (had?) an interesting way of doing things. They didn't have private offices. They have "pods" which are a rooms which has 3 to 6 desks, and are organized by division. Some divisions, of course, had more than one pod; the one I was in had three pods, next to one another, with internal doorways. Seeting was very egalitarian and random -- as a new temp, I wound up a koosh-ball throw away from the CTO. From time to time, someone would decide they needed a change of view, or to be closer to someone they were working with, and would pick up and move to another (open) desk in the pod (or another pod of the same division). Since their philosophy was to issue laptops by default, moving was a matter of a hour or two, if you had a lot of plants or papers or something.

      So it was for IT, Web Development, HR, Marketing, and, of course, all the Research divisions (the people who make the product :). I get the impression Sales may have been organized differently (cubes).

      I found it really great. The low population of a pod (and I was in one of the crowded pods) meant everyone was quiet enough I could think. People I was working with were right there, and I could see if they were busy/on the phone/etc. before I interrupted them with a question, and without my having to leave my desk. It was pleasantly convival without being distracting. It was nicely flexible and the egalitarianism was very nice.

      And they did it without thin clients. A lot of the putative benefits of thin clients can be gleened from investing in laptops as the default machines for everyone (regardless of platform).

      They did a bunch of unusual business practices which worked really well.

      --
      -*- Any technology indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced -*-
    13. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by buysse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm running sunrays -- we have a pair of X1s (single processor, slow boxes) running for over 30 stations, and it's /fine/. You don't run compute jobs on those boxes -- you ssh to another box and run your compute-intensive jobs there. Simple enough.

      Most likely, if it's too slow to use after 20 users on a 16-processor box, the box is not the bottleneck (unless every one of those users is re-encoding multiple mpeg files to Divx or similar). A much more likely bottleneck is a piss-poor network design. These things need some serious everfucking bandwidth (my only complaint about it -- I mean, it's a remote framebuffer -- give it simple acceleration functions, even on the level of a ET4000 or a Mach 8!)

      --
      -30-
    14. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem with Windows PCs in the office is that people are always installing shit on them. You know, 5 different instant messengers, a bunch of cheesy games downloaded from the web, and various banner ad / trojan programs. Then they wonder why their computer is crashing all the time!

    15. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by Fjord · · Score: 1

      We looked into the cost of SunRays at the company I was working for in 2000. It ended up that, admin aside (we didn't have any data on that), a SunRay plus it's share of the server and switch network (switch was required) was ~$800, which isn't that much less than a PC, but a lot less than a laptop.

      They were kinda cool, but only kinda. Like people are saying, this has been done before, and can be accomplished with VNC (although you won't get the whole SmartCard thing).

      --
      -no broken link
    16. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by scrytch · · Score: 2

      16 cpu'S, 20 users, and slow ... dude, call support and get it fixed. That's way sub-optimal performance, and way way out of spec. The initial roll-out of these things (when they were called Coronas), we ran a hundred users on an eight way box, and I actually jumped in on it because it ran circles around my ultra 10 (which i'll admit is not the zippiest workstation) even under full load.
      700 users on one server is easy, though I've never seen them claim that it'll do all 700 at a time (after 200, it really started to bog)

      ... Or does it make you feel superior to stand up and testify like it gives you some inside knowledge the way it supposedly works in the rest of the world? Wouldn't be the first ...

      Anyway, coronas aren't for everyone (developers who run a lot of compiles, bad), but zero-admin makes them *amazingly* cheap for places like schools, where PC's are abused like hell and they cost more to admin than buy.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    17. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I think his problem was server performance, not network bandwidth (not counting remote network resources). If he didn't allocate enough bandwidth for the sunrays, then he'd be getting tearing effects on the screens, not slow application performance. I'm guessing he had runaway processes that were never killed off, that SRM was never being run, and that no one even bothered to run ps to diagnose the problem, let alone pkill. And under no circumstance was weakness ever admitted by doing the unforgivable, and calling support...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    18. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by dpol · · Score: 1

      We've been using Sun Rays at my Computer Science department for a couple of years now, and I must say that I'm impressed; I definitely believe that thin clients are the future now. Performance is more than adequate. As some poster mentioned, if we wish to do something computationally expensive, we can just log into a standard workstation and start our jobs there. Not that I've ever felt a need to do that.

      I'm part of a student group maintaining programs that aren't critical to the department (like Mozilla and, uh, xsnow), and I've gotta tell you, it's a relief to install a program once on the server, and see it just work on every terminal.

      We have a Mac room as well (recently upgraded to G4 computers running Mac OS X), and they're all littered with student files and programs (or at least the old Mac OS 9 machines were). A couple of years back, when I was in high school, we used Windows machines. There were always heaps of viruses and programs not approved by the school on these computers.

      I'm sure that our system administrators can recall episodes where things didn't work so smoothly with our Sun Rays, but as a partially outside observer, I have to say that Sun's solution works exceptionally well.

      --
      -- David Polberger Computer Science major, University of Lund, Sweden
    19. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by buysse · · Score: 2

      In other words, admin was incompetent. He or she would probably have the same problems with anything -- Windows Terminal Server (!), database servers, etc.

      Computers are useless if you don't know how to use them.

      --
      -30-
    20. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by meldroc · · Score: 2

      Chances are you won't be allowed to be pissed off, as it will be some high muckity-muck PHB who'll be saving those desks, and will pull rank to make you sit somewhere eles..

      --

      Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
    21. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At about, oh, 20 users it becomes nearly unusably slow.

      One word: INCOMPETENCE

      The system and network administrators at your school should be fired, and people with real brains be put in their place. 16 CPUs and 20 users?!?!? No way in hell. That system is barely loaded! 700 users might be a stretch, but several hundred would be no problem at all (that is, if your sysadmins were competent).

      A system that holds 16 CPUs would be one of the bigger Enterprise or Fire servers...do you know Sun uses these things to set world records for transaction throughput? And your school can't get them to handle 20 users??? LOL!

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    22. Re:Sun Rays and remote X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waving the gun around a few times the first week you start really gets rid of these, and many other, annoying problems.

  20. err dumb client by nil+error · · Score: 1

    err thin clients err network computers - what ! do they not think we have a memory of more than 2 years to raise their $6 stock?!

  21. We already do this at my job... by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but it pisses everyone off because I'm the only one doing it so I leave my crap everywhere.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:We already do this at my job... by Webmoth · · Score: 2

      "...I leave my crap everywhere"

      Man, I hate people who don't flush!

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  22. Is this computer yours? by InsaneCreator · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of college. Make sure you are among the first few in the classroom, so you get a good computer. But even if you got the best computer it would still have a crappy keyboard on which the backspace key would get stuck every now and then (it would ALWAYS be the backspace key, so it would delete a few more characters than you wanted it to and you'd have to retype them) and the mouse would be so dirty that it would stick to your hand!! Well, I might be exaggerating a little bit. But the bottom line is if people can't say "this computer is mine" then they simply won't bother treating it with a little care.

    1. Re:Is this computer yours? by manofherb · · Score: 1

      why not just give everyone thier own wireless keyboard and mouse to use, just take them with you when you come and go

    2. Re:Is this computer yours? by toast0 · · Score: 2

      With appropriate complaint logging in place for hardware issues (such as dirty ass mouse and stuck backspace, etc), and some fun with statistics, management can have some idea of who needs a reminder about taking care of the equipment.

      On the other hand, since all the equipment is sun's, they can probably get it replaced on the cheap.

    3. Re:Is this computer yours? by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      All the 'computers' are the same - they are all Sun Rays, completely removing the need to get the best machine by getting in early!!!

  23. This sucks. by dangermouse · · Score: 1
    There are three reasons to have an office:
    1. So the company has a place to keep its stuff
    2. So people from outside the company have a place to contact the company
    3. So employees have a physical space in which to work together
    Now, this doesn't really affect the first or second reason for an office. But the third.. what's the point of having a common workspace if your team is never in the same place at the same time?

    Hint: If you think telecommunication has advanced to the point that physical, face-to-face communication is no longer necessary, you're nuts. I could maybe work at 80% of my current efficiency without having the other guys a raised voice away, but even then I wouldn't be happy about it.

    1. Re:This sucks. by elmegil · · Score: 2

      What makes you think that employees never see each other? You think the cubes are miles away from each other in some vast wasteland? You think I don't have the common sense to reserve a cube next week that's somewhere near the cube I was in this week? (for that matter, you think there are no squatters?)

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:This sucks. by janda · · Score: 1

      You're lucky. I could work at least 150% better if I didn't have to hear every single conversation that every single person was having with everybody on the phone, in person, over the cubicle wall, on the cell phone, by telepathy, etc.

      Yes, having the systems geek where I just have him conference me in by using the speakerphone does have advantages *at times*, but not all the time.

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
    3. Re:This sucks. by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2

      I can see this working for my company but only for certain job functions. I'm sure that Sun isn't implementing this across the board for all their employees. I think this might work well at my company for inside sales, technical support, and in conjunction with a beefy PDA even for outside sales. Basically anything that doesn't require storing piles of stuff someplace or leaving parts laying out for extended periods.

      As for being able to talk to people you work with in person, this system will enable personal teleconferencing with an optional camera. And if you still want to be face to face how about browsing to a webpage on your intranet that displays a floorplan highlighting everyone in your department? You could also search by name. You would be registered automatically when you swipe your card in the reader.

      Besides people will automatically congregate together based on physical location and habit. For example, Marketing people might head for the open cubes near the color copier while Engineers would look first for an open cube near the R)

  24. The O in "Old Economy" by elphkotm · · Score: 1

    You mean the R in "Reality"?

    --

    <Amanda`> I just went out to the parking lot in my bathrobe to exchange warez CDs.
  25. Interesting phraseology from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sun also has its own word processing and office suite, called Star Office, which it has begun selling, instead of it giving away, in a sign of maturity for the Microsoft Office rival.

    Nice typo, too. So anyway, I guess the point they're trying to make is that your product can only be taken seriously if you're selling it, not giving it way. Make sure you write this down.

  26. Re:Real brilliant. (It is at least a step in the r by WizardX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A story on NewsForge Secretaries use Linux, taxpayers save millions amost a year ago parallels this. I think the concept is a good idea, esp for those in the Bay area. My desk is nothing more than a junk pile anyway, I would be all for it.

    Plus, it makes the IT departments job SOOOOOO much easier.

  27. Chiat/Day Experiment Link by pgrote · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're interested in what happened, people working out of the trunks of their car, check out this overview.

    Wacky Stuff ...

    Chiat/Day Experiment

  28. I dont know about the rest of you... by nochops · · Score: 1

    ...but I *like* having a desk/cubicle to call my own. I like the security of feeling fairly confident that nobody but me has farted in my chair, and nobody has had their greasy hands on my mouse or stapler, not to mention their greasy fingerprints on my monitor.

    I shudder at the thought of having to sit at my co-worker's desk. I wouldn't have any time for work after I finished cleaning the coffee stains from the desk and keyboard, and the potato chip crumbs out of the mouse rollers.

    I don't know about the rest of you, but if this were implemented at my office, I'd come in as *late* as possible. I may bet the worst desk in the office, but I'd probably get teh same one every day.

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    1. Re:I dont know about the rest of you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did fart in your chair and I am wearing your underware. Wash 'em next time, eh?

      Oh, and that's not grease....pure protein, perhaps, but definitely not grease.

    2. Re:I dont know about the rest of you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh ... excuse me ... I think you have my stapler

    3. Re:I dont know about the rest of you... by ebh · · Score: 1

      Oh, THANKS for that image, which brought to mind a previous-employer memory I thought I had successfully repressed.

      One of the guys I worked with had somewhat substandard personal hygiene. In particular, he neither covered his mouth when he sneezed nor turned his head away from his screen....

  29. Imageine a bewoulf cluster of those.... by janda · · Score: 1

    Ok, I guess folks haven't gotten the joke yet, but Sun is starting to do the exact same thing IBM did back in the 60's.

    Maybe the Sun machines have more then 80x24 amber
    7-character ASCII display, but the principle is the
    same.

    --
    Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
    1. Re:Imageine a bewoulf cluster of those.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they had 80x43 green 8 bit ebcdic displays (3278) or color graphic displays (3279). And its not the same, 'cause MVS & VM rock & Unix sucks.

    2. Re:Imageine a bewoulf cluster of those.... by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      7 Character? Which 7? a, b, c, d, e, f, g? I think you mean 7 bit.

      I have used these machines, and they are very slick!

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  30. I call the corner office! by timeOday · · Score: 1

    I wonder if people really roam around like they're "supposed to," or if people settle into a routine of sitting in the same place. Like in a college class where this girl walks up and accuses me of being in "her" seat.

    1. Re:I call the corner office! by elmegil · · Score: 1

      It all depends on how strict the cubical nazis are in your office :-) (this model is worldwide, not just two or three corporate centers)

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  31. Good idea, bad implementation by bihoy · · Score: 2

    When I worked at Bell Labs we had Bit Blit graphics terminals that were all networked to an Amdahl 5880 Mainframe running SVR2. We also had real offices with walls and doors. We could work at our desks or in the labs. It was true mobility without any of the dehuminizing crap. This was back in the late 80's when people were still valued as people.

    1. Re:Good idea, bad implementation by pedro · · Score: 2

      Dehuminizing?
      Try 'Dehumanising'.
      I know. Brit spelling.
      So shoot me.
      I just hate when an otherwise intelligent post loses 'it'.

      --
      Brak: What's THAT?
      Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    2. Re:Good idea, bad implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try complete sentence

  32. Show up early, get McNealy's office! by GGardner · · Score: 5, Funny

    "'You come in early, you get a good a parking space, you get a good office.' Chief Executive Scott McNealy has summed up the iWork program. "

    How early do I have to come in to get Scott's office?

    1. Re:Show up early, get McNealy's office! by green+pizza · · Score: 2

      How early do I have to come in to get [Sun CEO Scott McNealy] Scott's office?

      Belive it or not, McNealy has a supervisor-sized cube (albeit in a corner with some nice windows). If you want to see some nice executive offices, forget the tech industry, the oil folks are where its at. Even a "lowly" VP at ExxonMobil in Houston has over 3,000 square feet of private office/meeting/washroom space... almost as much space as an average size house!

    2. Re:Show up early, get McNealy's office! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Belive it or not, McNealy has a supervisor-sized cube (albeit in a corner with some nice windows).

      Green Pizza:
      It sounds like you know a lot about McNealy's office -- Ever been there? Ever peeked in the window? I'd heard his office is high up in a building inaccessible to normal Sun Security cards...

      Seems bigger than my supervisor's cube!

    3. Re:Show up early, get McNealy's office! by pmz · · Score: 1

      ... over 3,000 square feet of private office/meeting/washroom space... almost as much space as an average size house!

      Geez, I'd like to know where 3000 sq. ft. is average. Can I move in with you?

      (just kidding, but 1500 sq. ft. is a much more realistic average for the rest of us)

    4. Re:Show up early, get McNealy's office! by Bat_Masterson · · Score: 1

      Even a "lowly" VP at ExxonMobil in Houston has over 3,000 square feet of private office/meeting/washroom space... almost as much space as an average size house!


      Hrmph! That's almost twice the size of the average Silicon Valley home...
  33. Workers may not like this by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

    Sure, it sounds like a good idea. Personally, I wouldn't mind a trial run of it. However, most people need to have some sort of stuff on their desk, in dead-tree format, be it manuals or a Dilbert book. I don't see this promoting that, obviously. It could work for a little while, but people would get fed up really fast with that.

    --
    Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
  34. I kind of like this idea! by pedro · · Score: 2

    If going to work could be as rich and variable, as, say, going to the library, this could be very cool!
    Imagine! No office cliques, since there'd be no fixed offices!
    Good thing, IMHO.
    Cliques are for idiots.
    You 'rub elbows' with many folk that you don't know! [duffman!] Ohyeah! [/duffman!]
    Excellent foundry for mating opportunities!
    You don't have to deal *every fscking day* with that drooling moron in the next cube that thinks large eyed velvet painting child images of the early 70's constitute 'high art'.
    I'm liking this more and more.

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
  35. Yahoo Discovers Dumb Reporters by ChanxOT5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ugh, check out the english on this.

    "An office costs about $15,000 per year to maintain, Agnello says, and Sun plans about one desk per employee, including the remote locations, once the system is running, with 18,000 employees, roughly half the company, floating. "

    comma hell!

    1. Re:Yahoo Discovers Dumb Reporters by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Routers and AP seem more interested in "breaking the story first" than actually spell-checking. I like how most of the paragraphs are exactly one sentence long.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:Yahoo Discovers Dumb Reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I thought routers just relayed the information and didn't perform any processing such as spell checking...

    3. Re:Yahoo Discovers Dumb Reporters by benjamindees · · Score: 1
      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:Yahoo Discovers Dumb Reporters by Spunk · · Score: 1

      He was making a joke and you totally missed it.

      Routers - network devices
      Reuters - a news service

      get it?

  36. Sun Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The terminals are called 'Sun Ray', and consist of either a 17" CRT or 15" LCD or a headless cpu, all of which contain a card reader. They also have headphone and video (RCA) out.

    They have dedicated motherboards with built-in ethernet and USB. They have no floppy or HD.

    You can't buy an entire computer, with monitor and OS for that price. I'm sure you can get that price down much lower when negotiating hundreds of units and a server.

    One server can drive hundreds of these. You simply use your smart card to logon, and your current saved desktop is delivered to your screen. There are no costs involved in administrating a stand alone cpu, and you never have to upgrade.

    1. Re:Sun Ray by shepd · · Score: 1

      >You can't buy an entire computer, with monitor and OS for that price.

      You sure can buy an entire computer with monitor and OS and many other peripherals for less. I'll stick to the same online company to show it can be done without effort.

      Allow me to demonstrate:

      - Motherboard with CPU, sound, video, network, USB: $79 (mentioned above by me cause I was too lazy to log in and I tire of seeming like a PCChips pusher)
      - 17" Monitor: $125.
      - Mouse and Keyboard: $15 (not worth linking -- they're usually cheaper).
      - Windows: $86.
      - Memory: $42
      256 MB.
      - Case /w PS: $24.

      Total: $356

      Let's make it better than the sun box though:

      - Hard Drive: $65.
      - Floppy Drive: $9.
      - CD Burner: $67.

      Total: $512 and this does far more than the Sunray.

      Savings: Up to $144. More if you don't want to use Windows. Another $124 if I'm right and the $500 sunray doesn't include a display.

      And I know you can get that price much, much, much lower if you were to deal with distributors (and if you're talking 50 or more units, you most likely would have to).

      >There are no costs involved in administrating a stand alone cpu, and you never have to upgrade.

      More video performance is always needed with age, vendors obsolete proprietary old hardware by not providing necessary software upgrades, network standards change, people spill coffee into them, people stuff postit notes in silly places, people destroy the buttons, they stack telephone books on them, stack books to block the fan, stop the fan with pens when its too noisy, open them to "fix" them -- there's way more, but I'm not interested in reliving the pain. :-)

      BTW: Speaking as someone who has worked as computer support staff for a college with over 1000 terminals, I can tell you that software is one of the least worries. Computers, even though most parts don't move, do "wear out" -- parts either fail or stupid people beat the crap out of the computers.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Sun Ray by darkonc · · Score: 2
      Total: $512 and this does far more than the Sunray.
      Savings: Up to $144. More if you don't want to use Windows. Another $124 if I'm right and the $500 sunray doesn't include a display.

      You forgot software;
      You forgot support;

      This is where MS makes it's big killing. They probably get $500+ for each office worker in software. -- and then there's your AntiVirus Software too.
      and your (semi) yearly software upgrages .. just to keep all of those boxes inter-operating, since Microsoft software often fails to interoperate properly with it's older bretheren.
      And, of course, you need to pay people to run around doing the weekly MS security updates.

      It also sounds like (from other posts) that the $500 quoted for a sunray is a bit high (unless it's for the 24" display model, in which case, it's pretty cheap).
      It may be that $500/seat includes amortized server costs..

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    3. Re:Sun Ray by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      You sure can buy an entire computer with monitor and OS and many other peripherals for less. I'll stick to the same online company to show it can be done without effort.

      You're comparing Sun hardware (usually fairly decent, isn't it?) to a system built around a PC Chips (aka Piece-o-Sh*t) motherboard? Let's see what we can build with something a bit better (prices are from Newegg):

      • Biostar M7VKQ motherboard (MicroATX, VIA KL133) $49.00
      • AMD Duron 900MHz OEM $35.00
      • Kingston ValueRAM 256MB PC133 SDRAM $43.00
      • MS Win2K Pro SP2 $141.00 (XP suXors)
      • Enlight EN-7150AJ MicroATX case w/PS $38.00
      • Cooler Master DP5-5G11A heatsink/fan $4.00
      • Focus FK2001 keyboard $18.00 (not the cheapest you can get, but it clicks :-) )
      • MS PS/2 IntelliMouse (OEM) $11.00
      • Western Digital 400BB 40GB 7200rpm HD $74.00
      • Teac FD235 3.5" floppy drive $9.00
      • Toshiba SD-R1202 CD-RW/DVD-ROM drive $93.00
      • KDS VS-7P 17" monitor $119.00

      Not counting the cost to ship all those parts, you're looking at $634. Drop Win2K from the order and you're down to $493. (Hmm...looks like I only ended up reinforcing your point, even with the better hardware. Damn, this stuff's getting cheap!)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:Sun Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that you failed to mention the labor costs of screwing all this shit together, testing, and returning all the defective crap because you lowballed the bid. You do this shit for free? God forbid you actually _want_ to troubleshoot those pieces of crap.

      Get a clue Slashbots -- just because you can screw together a computer doesn't mean you know how to pick peanuts out of shit on a corporate network. Get a quote from Dell and HP and then start talking.

    5. Re:Sun Ray by joto · · Score: 2
      Total: $356

      All fine and dandy, but does it have the nifty card-reader feature where you bring your desktop along to the next machine?

      Let's make it better than the sun box though:

      • - Hard Drive [computernirvana.com]: $65.
      • - Floppy Drive [computernirvana.com]: $9.
      • - CD Burner [computernirvana.com]: $67.

      Total: $512 and this does far more than the Sunray.

      Yes, it now has a harddisk that can fail, a useless floppy drive, and a cd-burner allowing employees to spend time maintaining their music collection instead of actual work. But does it still have the nifty features of Sun Ray?

      More video performance is always needed with age, vendors obsolete proprietary old hardware by not providing necessary software upgrades, network standards change, people spill coffee into them, people stuff postit notes in silly places, people destroy the buttons, they stack telephone books on them, stack books to block the fan, stop the fan with pens when its too noisy, open them to "fix" them -- there's way more, but I'm not interested in reliving the pain. :-)

      Yes, but there are fewer parts to destroy with a Sun Ray. Anyway, people who deliberately damage the fan should probably pay for repair themselves.

      BTW: Speaking as someone who has worked as computer support staff for a college with over 1000 terminals, I can tell you that software is one of the least worries. Computers, even though most parts don't move, do "wear out" -- parts either fail or stupid people beat the crap out of the computers.

      Yes, and that's why it's worth a little more to get something without moving parts.

  37. "Hotelling" by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've heard it called "hotelling". One implementation I heard about had a 'locker room' where you could store your personal effects. They got around having filing cabinets in each office by having a central bullpen for all the filing.

    Here's a similar story, slightly off-topic, but illustrative of a similar corporate mindthink.

    A few years back someone told me of how "Kal Kan", the american dog-food company, operates. The entire headquarters is run out of a large open space similar in size to a high-school gymnasium. There are no cubes and no offices. Desks were arranged class room style, in neat rows. Everyone, from the president on down, worked from identical desks and identical chairs. Everyone had a single 2 drawer filing cabinet in their desk. At night, the cleaners were instructed to throw away anything that was left on top of the desk. Fax machines, copiers, water coolers, and conference rooms were along the outside walls. Apparently everyone respected everyone's privacy and kept their voices down.

    There is a certain comfort knowing that everyone at work is being treated equally. Hotelling is another way to bring that about.

    I think it might be most useful for businesses where a lot of staff are always 'out of the office'. When I started out as a environmental consultant, I only had a couple of project files at any one time. A hotelling setup would have been ideal for us most of us were in the field half the time.

    --
    My father is a blogger.
    1. Re:"Hotelling" by owenc · · Score: 0, Troll
      times 17.3.84 bb speech malreported africa rectify times 19.12.83 forecasts 3 yp 4th quarter 83 misprints verify current issue times 14.2.84 miniplenty malquoted chocolate rectify times 3.12.83 reporting bb dayorder doubleplusungood refs unpersons rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling
    2. Re:"Hotelling" by krokodil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The entire headquarters is run out of a large open space similar in size to a high-school gymnasium.

      What a sad picture. I hope future of workplace does
      not head in this direction. I hate cubicles! I like nice offices, possibly for 2-3 persons no more, with non uniform furniture. I like touch of personality in the office. I like wooden desks and shelfs. I like table lapms and filing cabinets. I like to be able to turn on music while I am working. I am programmer, not factory assembly line worker for god sake.

      Here how I would do: I would allocate each emploee certain amout per year to furnish his office. He can chose whatever he wants from furniture and accessories within this budget.

    3. Re:"Hotelling" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is a certain comfort knowing that everyone at work is being treated equally. Hotelling is another way to bring that about."

      There is the flip side to this coin called hotelling that you aren't considering. This basically strips everyone of identity, making it so everyone feels completely replaceable. I've worked these "hotels" before, and the turn-over rate was horrid. No one felt valued - it is very depressing to come in every day and find yourself stripped of any individuality. This also discourgages differing opinions from being shared, and as a result, buisness suffers. I've worked in "hotels", I've worked cubes, I've worked private offices, I've worked in "shared space" with 2-3 in an office/cube, and I've worked in walkthrough "shotgun apartment" style work settings. Hotels are in my experience the absolute worst.

    4. Re:"Hotelling" by Peyna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, Microsoft probably has one of the best worker environments. I'm sure we've all heard how great it is, everyone gets their own office with a window, and put whatever they want to in it; not to mention everything else on their campus. I'm sure that works to their advantage. Just having your own office + window probably boosts productivity enough to be worth it.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:"Hotelling" by krokodil · · Score: 1

      go away! stop tempting me. i will not go
      to work for evil empire. i will not sell
      my GPL-ed freedom for office with window!

      :)

    6. Re:"Hotelling" by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 2

      In fact, MS is a nice place to work. If you have your own office, you can have your ORA book set within arm's reach, your plants nearby to provide oxygen and relaxation, and a door that you can close when you need to keep out the interruptions.

      This is an interesting idea when looking at commute times, but I can Terminal Service from home to my office machines too. I don't need to be "hotelled" to get out of traffic.

      One of the problems that I can see with Hotelling is that if everyone is on the move, I can't walk around the corner and ask a co-worker or manager about a problem, demonstrate it on their computer, and cooperatively sketch out solutions on their whiteboard.

      BTW - I know several MSofties who had previously sworn to themselves that they would never work for MS and are currently very happy working at MS.

    7. Re:"Hotelling" by tunah · · Score: 2
      I'm sure we've all heard how great it is, everyone gets their own office with a window, and put whatever they want to in it; not to mention everything else on their campus. I'm sure that works to their advantage. Just having your own office + window probably boosts productivity enough to be worth it.

      And they're pissed off about cubicles etc in other companies - no more free marketing for them :)

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    8. Re:"Hotelling" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am programmer, not factory assembly line worker for god sake"

      I don't get it. First, you say you're a programmer, then, you say that you're not a factory assembly line worker?

    9. Re:"Hotelling" by gargle · · Score: 2

      That only makes sense if the work you're doing is valuable enough, and need to attract top talent. For the average VB programmer, that's hard to justify.

    10. Re:"Hotelling" by cordelia · · Score: 1

      We do this, but it is called "Dynamic Officing." Same idea, nicer name. Out of the 400 people who work in our department, nearly half are out of the office on any given day. We all have lap tops, cell phones, and 2 rolling filing cabinets. We "check in" to a desk in the morning. You keep the same desk everyday, until you are out of the office for more than 5 consecutive business days. At that time, they can reassign your cube.

      As for personal affects out on the desk, they are allowed, as long at the stuff fits into one of your rolling cabinet drawers(in case you left your stuff out and they need to reassign.)

      I like this idea. If I am in town, I have a usual spot to sit. When I am traveling, I don't care if someone sits in my cube, because I'm not there. I don't have to worry about calling in to check my voice mail, because I don't have a desk phone.

    11. Re:"Hotelling" by anothy · · Score: 2

      that's a nice idea at first, but it's neither cost-effective for the company nor productive for the employee.

      first, for the company: basic economic facts show that you do better buying in bulk. a company can order 1,000 office setups for much lower than it'd cost the workers to go out and buy it themselves. it's also a waste of time - most large companies have a HR person to do this, so i can focus on doing what i'm hired to do. and if the company simply divides what they normally spend on an office to the number of people in it, you're gonna get a real skimpy budget to work with.
      also note that, for the company, this would effectivly mean re-spending that money every time someone new shows up. i'm not likely to have the same tastes in furniture you do. and then, in addition to buying new furniture, they have to do something (store or dispose of) the old furniture. more cost. this'll all further impact the cost to the company and the budget you get to work with.

      for the worker, a communal workplace can be much more productive than private (or pseudo-private) workplaces (and certainly far more productive than cubes). being able to sit right next to, with no barrier, the half-dozen people you're working on a project with is a huge win. being able to walk into a lab down the hall and find a half-dozen people working on another project is a big win for knowledge sharing, too.

      also, i'm not sure what you're "I hate cubicles!" bit is refering to. nobody's advocated cubes. i agree, they're awful. but that's not what's being discussed. the problem with cubicles is that they don't offer the privacy and chance for "personality" that offices do, but they cut you off from co-workers and provide enough uniformity to make you feel uncomfortable. the solution described eliminates the sense of being cut off from co-workers, so that you can talk to people you're working with more easially, and so you develop something of a sense of community.

      oh, and threre's this great new gadget i ran across (maybe i should post a slashdot article suggestion) for listening to music in shared spaces: headphones! or even just a volume knob.

      the choice of what furniture and whatnot to stick at each workstation remains an open question.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    12. Re:"Hotelling" by billatq · · Score: 1

      Although it isn't necessarily cost productive, remember that we're looking at Microsoft here, the same company that pretended to make less than they really do. The cost element isn't really an issue in this scenario, though the productivity element in itself is still a very valid point.

    13. Re:"Hotelling" by bcaulf · · Score: 1

      similar corporate mindthink.

      Mindthink, the worst sort of think!

      Groupthink, perhaps.

    14. Re:"Hotelling" by anothy · · Score: 1

      well, for one thing, i was talking about the more general case. i have no interest in debating a given companies financials. and i wasn't actually aware of anyone mentioning MicroSoft. but more relavantly, don't underestimate how big the discounts you get for buying bulk are. a company with 10,000 is going to have a huge savings going with some uniform furniture, even if they give the employees a choice between a few styles.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    15. Re:"Hotelling" by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      You could furnish them with a catalog from which to choose their furniture/accesories. That would be like playing Sims in real life :)
      Seriously, sounds like a good idea to me.

  38. Why still go into an office? by shaolind · · Score: 1

    So, what is the point of having an office building for most workers at this point? With all the 'hot desking' going on, won't you have trouble finding people for a face to face chat?

    It would seem just as good an idea (or bad) to have everyone work remotely from home.

    Just have a few people on site to make sure nothing catched fire or something, and that's it.

    1. Re:Why still go into an office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be caught fire you dolt.

  39. There are other ways to save money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sun could move most of its workforce to places where real estate is cheaper and still be able to give its workers better conditions.

    But what do I know? They consider people to be mere "resources".

  40. Horrible Idea! by night_flyer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    its like low income housing as opposed to a nice apartment complex.

    most people take care of a nice apartment (there are exceptions) but low income housing is almost always in shambles.

    if you have your own workstation & cubicle/office you will have a sense of pride, like you would if you rented a nice apartment. you take care of it and it takes care of you. the people that had it before you more than likely took care of it and the management knew what was wrong with each unit and who the trouble makers were.

    the first come first serve grab a PC would be like low income housing, you would have very little chance of knowing what kind of person was there before, much less the time before that, the management doesnt really care, or is off site and there is very little pride in where you live.

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  41. So thats what they use those "thin clients" for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess since the product didnt sell well, they had to use it up internally...

  42. SunRay by Torg · · Score: 4, Informative

    First they are not dumb ternimals, far from it. It is called a SunRay. If you want to know more about them, try http://www.sun.com/products/sunray/. Amongst other things you can take your SunRay card, pull it from your terminal and go put it in another. As long as the SunRay is on the same system you get your exact desktop back. With SunRay you also dont waste the vast amount of computing resources in your workplace. Don't take my word for it, go ask distribted.net. And that is just for wasted CPU cycles.

    Second it is called Flexable Field Office. This means that you do NOT have to go into to the office to work. It is BECAUSE of this meany of the Sun workers were NOT in the World Trade Center Last September 11. You also do not have to be in your home town to go to an office to do work. Where it made sense, some employes kept their offices.

    Ever wish you could telecommute?

    Yes Sun even pays for its workers home office equipment and Internet access so they can work.

    And Sun saved money doing it.
    1. Re:SunRay by sloth+jr · · Score: 1
      No.


      The SunRays really are dumb terminals. No
      processing is performed in the client. It
      serves only as a conduit for sound, graphics,
      keyboard and mouse events. All processing is
      performed on a local centralized server. You
      seem to know this, so I'm not sure why you wouldn't
      call the SunRays dumb terminals.


      That doesn't mean they aren't incredibly useful
      in certain environments.

  43. This is so 90's by UGG · · Score: 1

    I thought this "hot desking" fad died back in the 90's. If advertising trendoids can't be weened off their desks, what hope do you have with conservative techies?

    It also has the sinister effect of making employees feel less secure about their job, like they are already half way out the door.

    You go CEO! Turn that fear dial up to 11.

  44. We do this where I work. by garcia · · Score: 1, Troll

    No big fucking deal. Everyone pretty much chooses the same general area everyday. It is not a fight to get to THE best desk first.

    I don't really like the centralized shit, they can watch stuff too easily.

    On a side note:
    Sun also has its own word processing and office suite, called Star Office, which it has begun selling, instead of it giving away, in a sign of maturity for the Microsoft Office rival.

    Explain to me how selling a piece of software is "maturity". Idiots.

    1. Re:We do this where I work. by elmegil · · Score: 2

      Think of the audience: corporate types, who tend to be suspicious of free software (who can you hang? What's it worth if it costs nothing?) I agree the point is stupid, but that's who's targetted. At least Sun knows what audience they're shooting for.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:We do this where I work. by garcia · · Score: 1, Troll

      it was a worthless point to make. It had absolutely nothing to do w/the article. They just had to make a stab at something.

    3. Re:We do this where I work. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Explain to me how selling a piece of software is "maturity". Idiots.

      Any slack-jawed mouth-breather can give software away. In fact, if you look at Freshmeat, it appears that most of them do.

      But if you expect somebody to give you money for software, it implies that you've spent some time polishing and perfecting that software. It implies that you've got some pride in that software, and that that software is worth something. In sort, it's a sign of maturity, just like the article said.

      That's why commercial software will always be perceived to be of higher quality than free software.

      Of course, there's also the fact that, with remarkably few exceptions, commercial software is of higher quality than free software.

    4. Re:We do this where I work. by jred · · Score: 2

      Thanks for saving me the time. I'd have mentioned something about developers getting paid, but that's just me...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    5. Re:We do this where I work. by Skim123 · · Score: 2
      On a side note:
      Sun also has its own word processing and office suite, called Star Office, which it has begun selling, instead of it giving away, in a sign of maturity for the Microsoft Office rival.

      Explain to me how selling a piece of software is "maturity". Idiots

      It is maturity because Sun is realizing to make a buck they actually have to start making and selling software, as opposed to suing Microsoft.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    6. Re:We do this where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you post was even more worthless. Can we start a recursive flame war now?

    7. Re:We do this where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you come to the conclusion that comercial software is of higher quality? My guess is that you pulled it out of your ass.

    8. Re:We do this where I work. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >But if you expect somebody to give you money for software, it implies that you've spent some time polishing and perfecting that software.

      Well, you're right on. I mean, with a polished and perfected piece of software there'd be no security or usability problems, right?

      So why, exactly, do so many people rag on Microsoft? I mean, they have fewer security problems now then ever before!

      >Of course, there's also the fact that, with remarkably few exceptions, commercial software is of higher quality than free software.

      And all shareware is worth its registration price.

      Heh. If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell ya.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:We do this where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you're a fucking pansy.

      How about that?

      Oh yeah, I forgot, they are rampant on /.

      Morons, that like to hide.

      FUCK YOU.

    10. Re:We do this where I work. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I'd have mentioned something about developers getting paid, but that's just me...

      Doh! How could I have forgotten that little tidbit! As a rule, developers who get paid to work on software will produce better, higher quality code, with fewer bugs and tighter design, than developers who do it in their spare time. Yet another reason why commercial software implies better, more mature code.

    11. Re:We do this where I work. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I mean, with a polished and perfected piece of software there'd be no security or usability problems, right?

      Wrong. You're trying to use a reducto ad absurdum argument on be. It won't work.

      I didn't say that commercial software is always perfect all the time, like you seem to wish I had. I said exactly what I mean: if you try to turn software into a business, you're probably going to spend more time and energy on your software than if you just do it as a hobby. If you fail to do this, then you'll be out of business. So the implication is that commercial software is of higher quality than free software.

      This implication is strengthened by the fact that, in most cases, commercial software is of higher quality than comparable free software.

      A poster said that the person who said that Sun's selling of StarOffice is a sign of maturity was an idiot. I'm refuting that. While not a guarantee, it is entirely reasonable to consider commercial sale of a piece of software to be a sign of maturity.

      And all shareware is worth its registration price. Heh. If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell ya.

      I'm not sure I understand. Are you trying to say that commercial software is not, as a rule, better than comparable free software? If so, I'd like to get specific, please.

      I can think of one example of free software that's as good as or better than commercial software of the same type: Apache. Apache is the reference standard web server, and while there are other outstanding servers, none other seems to be quite able to balance portability, performance, and flexibility. So that's one.

      On the other hand, I can't think of any databases that are as good as or better than Oracle, DB2, or Sybase. I also can't think of a free ERP or AR/AP package the compares to SAP, or a free CRM package that compares to Siebel or Salesforce.com, or a free HR package that compares to Peoplesoft.

      Hell, I can't even think of a small business accounting application that compares to QuickBooks, or to Peachtree!

      So I'm really having a hard time understanding your argument, here.

    12. Re:We do this where I work. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Wrong. You're trying to use a reducto ad absurdum argument on be. It won't work.

      You're using latin debating terms to piss me off. It will work!

      You said "Of course, there's also the fact that, with remarkably few exceptions, commercial software is of higher quality than free software."

      Emphasis mine.

      Then you said:

      "if you try to turn software into a business, you're probably going to spend more time and energy on your software than if you just do it as a hobby."

      Which is absurd, unless you spend most of your life at work (most people don't, fortunately).

      "So the implication is that commercial software is of higher quality than free software."

      But you said that the remarkable majority (opposite of remarkably few) of commercial software is of higher quality than free software.

      You said it. Not me.

      Either take that or I'm going to call you on it.

      >Are you trying to say that commercial software is not, as a rule, better than comparable free software?

      Totally, that's exactly what I'm saying. I think that very little commercial software out there beats free software. By commercial and free software I'm not talking about individual packages, but entire solutions, since often a free solution consists of more separate packages than a free solution.

      >On the other hand, I can't think of any databases that are as good as or better than Oracle, DB2, or Sybase. I also can't think of a free ERP or AR/AP package the compares to SAP, or a free CRM package that compares to Siebel or Salesforce.com, or a free HR package that compares to Peoplesoft.

      I will say that there are very high quality free database systems. They may, or may not, do what you want. Of course, commercial software doesn't guarantee it'll do exactly what you want, either, unless you spend an amount equivalent to hiring programmers to add the features into an open source package.

      Here's a few more free pieces of software you've overlooked that meet or beat commercial solutions:

      Sendmail, GCC, Cygwin, KDE, GhostScript, Mozilla, I could go on, but I think I've already surpassed your few commercial examples.

      >So I'm really having a hard time understanding your argument, here.

      I'm having a hard time with yours, actually.

      So, what you're saying is that commercial software beats free software because it does a better job at accounting systems and ERP systems (which are often interrelated)?

      I think you'll need to do far better than that, especially as projects like GNUCash gain steam.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    13. Re:We do this where I work. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      You're using latin debating terms to piss me off. It will work!

      Excuse me for using precise terminology. (Except for the typo. It's "reductio," not "reducto." That's my bad.)

      Reductio ad absurdum is, first, a very common term. And second, it's clear, both from the term itself and from context, what it means. So quit complaining and crack a book.

      You then tried to point out a flaw in my argument. I'm going to try to get all of the relevant context here, while trimming it down for length.

      You said "Of course, there's also the fact that, with remarkably few exceptions, commercial software is of higher quality than free software." [...] "So the implication is that commercial software is of higher quality than free software." But you said that the remarkable majority (opposite of remarkably few) of commercial software is of higher quality than free software. You said it. Not me. Either take that or I'm going to call you on it.

      Um. Okay. I said that the majority of commercial software is of higher quality than its free software counterparts.

      Maybe you were confused by my use of the phrase, "with remarkably few exceptions," although I believe your quote was accurate. My statement meant that, while a few exceptions exist, commercial software products are superior to their free software alternatives.

      Now, finally, we get specific.

      Sendmail

      Okay, that's a good one. I'll give you Sendmail. It's big, and hard to use, but it's just as good as any other small-to-medium email server out there. Exchange server is really in a different class, and fairly crufty. Solutions like Post.Office are designed to deal with hundreds of thousands of users, which puts them in a different league.

      So you get Sendmail.

      GCC

      GCC is an okay compiler, but only if your #1 priority is portability. GCC will, it seems, generate code for damn near anything.

      But if you don't care about portability, then GCC is really a substandard compiler. It's okay for C, and utterly unacceptable for C++. Of course, it also tries to compile languages like Fortran, Objective C, and Java, but these are even worse disappointments. SGI's C, C++, and Fortran compilers for MIPS are the best I've used personally. I hear great things about Intel's compilers for IA-32 and IA-64, too.

      So GCC is marginal at best. It's got some things going for it, but on the whole it's not too great.

      Cygwin

      Cygwin is something of a one-trick pony. I suppose it's fine for what it does, but I'm having a hard time understanding why it exists at all, except as a novelty. I consider Cygwin to be inconclusive.

      KDE

      Are you serious? KDE is awful in comparison to the Windows, Mac OS Classic, or Mac OS X desktops. It's ugly, slow, and incomplete. Please don't try to hold up KDE as some kind of example of open source excellence.

      GhostScript

      GhostScript is neat because it works at all. But there is a lot of PostScript and PDF code out there that GhostScript can't handle. It's woefully incomplete when compared to Adobe's PostScript and PDF interpreters. Compare the number of RIPs that use GhostScript to the number that have licensed Adobe's interpreter to get a feel for how good GhostScript really is.

      Mozilla

      Every commercial browser currently available is superior to Mozilla. On Windows and Mac, IE is a lot faster. On Mac OS X, OmniWeb is prettier. Opera, although I don't use it myself, also has a lot going for it.

      We can talk all you want about how neat Mozilla may or may not be at some indefinite time in the future. As of right now-- and by "right now" I mean 1.0 RC 3, the version I have on my computer-- it's too buggy and too slow to be useful.

      So, what you're saying is that commercial software beats free software because it does a better job at accounting systems and ERP systems (which are often interrelated)? I think you'll need to do far better than that, especially as projects like GNUCash gain steam.

      Nope. I'm saying that commercial software beats free software because, as a rule, it does. Period. Accounting, databasing, ERP, CRM, and so on are just examples of things that lots of people use computers for.

      And GnuCash? It's trying to be Quicken for Linux. Only it's not as good as Quicken. If you insist on running Linux on your desktop (a mistake any way you slice it), then I guess you have no alternative but to use tools like GnuCash. In that situation, you're really comparing GnuCash to nothing at all, because that's what you'd be using otherwise.

      Depending on your needs, GnuCash may be superior to using nothing at all. But no promises.

  45. Sanitation ? by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Doesnt anyone remember the recent story about microbe levels on keyboards and mice? This will be a great victory for the common cold.


    Personnally I cant stand it when other people use my terminal (I learned dvorak, and popped out all the keys on my keyboard primarily to prevent people from using my terminal)


    Somehow, this idea seems stupid, especially wrt their programmers. I certainly wouldnt put up with that environment.


    The last thing I need to see on a monday morning is a moniter covered in fingerprints in front of a coke-sticky keyboard next to the mouse with the retarded ball.

    1. Re:Sanitation ? by Rainark · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I see people leave the bathroom regularly without washing their hands. There's an invention worth creating in this issue someplace...

      --
      A place for everything, everything in its place. - Ben Franklin
    2. Re:Sanitation ? by tg_schlacht · · Score: 1

      No shit. Whenever I had to use the system belonging to the owner of the company I worked for I always had to wipe the nasty, greasy, mouse off. You're supposed to wipe your hands on a napkin after eating. Failing that use your pants or shirt.

    3. Re:Sanitation ? by haystor · · Score: 1

      They probably didn't go to the school that taught you to wash your hands after going to the bathroom.

      They went to the one that taught you not to piss on yourself instead.

      --
      t
    4. Re:Sanitation ? by emag · · Score: 2

      It's not about pissing on yourself, it's about not spreading coliform.

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    5. Re:Sanitation ? by texchanchan · · Score: 2

      This is true. When I was a support tech, we got whichever mini-cube was free. Everybody was sick all the time. The ones with children would bring in cold viruses from the daycare and get them on the keyboard. We'd pick them up. We were just lucky there wasn't any MDR TB on the loose.

      They said it was a lot worse when they shared headsets, too.

    6. Re:Sanitation ? by eMilkshake · · Score: 1
      Somehow, this idea seems stupid, especially wrt their programmers. I certainly wouldnt put up with that environment. The last thing I need to see on a monday morning is a moniter...

      Maybe it's time to put the keys back on the keyboard!

    7. Re:Sanitation ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, get the gas masks.
      My fellow humans are sick.

    8. Re:Sanitation ? by ebh · · Score: 1

      I wish he had finished the joke:

      From a nearby stall: "At Rutgers we didn't have to be taught."

    9. Re:Sanitation ? by slamb · · Score: 1
      Everybody was sick all the time. [...] They said it was a lot worse when they shared headsets, too.

      I'm sure. A while back, a local telemarketing company came down with lice. The whole company, or pretty close.

    10. Re:Sanitation ? by dmelomed · · Score: 1

      I don't wash my hands when I only touch my dick and not the flusher.

    11. Re:Sanitation ? by symbolic · · Score: 2

      I'll not comment on your slang references, but obviously, then, the thought of you putting someone else's "dick" in your mouth doesn't bother you. To wit: someone uses the restroom, neglects to wash his hands, and then later uses your keyboard or shakes your hand. This is the same hand you then use to eat your mid-morning snack. Mmmmm...I'm getting hungry already. Herpes, anyone?

      If it's not a question of hygiene, it most certainly is a question of consideration.

  46. Mouseballs by panxerox · · Score: 0, Troll

    Floating sucks, just take the mouseball when you leave - no one will take your station.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  47. Cleanliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not for nothing, but I kind of like knowing that I'm the only dude using my keyboard mouse & phone.

    What happens to me if the guy who used the terminal the day before had a really flu, or if he didn't wash his hands after using the bathroom.

    Pretty disgusting eh?

    Imagine finding someone else's coffee stains or bagel seeds on or inside your keyboard?

    You'd be finding something new and disgusting every day!!!

    1. Re:Cleanliness by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Imagine finding someone else's coffee stains or bagel seeds on or inside your keyboard?

      Imagine being allergic to peanuts only to find out that someone at the only station left dropped his PBnJ Sammich on the keyboard the day before?

      Or, imagine being left handed only to find that every time you get up you have to have a spare non-ergo mouse to replace the company standard at every terminal.

      Or, imagine you use a special peripheral (like a scanner) only to find out the two stations with it are both being used to surf the internet on lunch break.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Cleanliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I suppose you don't care about someone using your phone or touching the door handle or shaking hands?

      ...your worry is a load of crap. You just want to complain.

    3. Re:Cleanliness by Bishop · · Score: 3, Interesting

      on a related note: I worked in a computer manufactureing and assemply plant. Naturally the plant runs 24/7, and people share equipment and workspaces across shifts. There was rarely a problem with equipment cleanliness. Except with the microscopes used for precision soldering. In particular people would forget to sterilize the eye pieces before and after their shift. This resulted in the occational massive outbraek of "pink eye." An annoying, and very contagious eye infection. You only need to get pink eye once to remember to clean the eye pieces with plenty of alcohol everytime you sit back down at a scope.

  48. Sun Ray 1; 100; 150 - Thin Clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The terminals are called 'Sun Ray', and consist of either a 17" CRT or 15" LCD or a headless cpu, all of which contain a card reader.

    They have dedicated motherboards with built-in ethernet and USB. They have no floppy or HD. They do have video (RCA) out and audio I/O (headphones).

    I'm sure you can get the unit price down much lower when negotiating multiple units and a server. No one would buy just one of these things.

    One server can drive hundreds of these. You simply use your smart card to logon, and your current saved desktop is delivered to your screen. There are no costs involved in administrating a stand alone cpu, and you never have to upgrade.

    1. Re:Sun Ray 1; 100; 150 - Thin Clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at work (a state uni) we bought a 220R and got 12 SR1s *and* 12 15" CRTs for free.

      and we didn't get screwed on the 220R either. we got it under the matching grant program. uni's (at least ours) first get 50% of the sticker price. then, the matching grant program pays for another 50%. we ended up paying 25% of the sticker price for a decked out 220R and 12 clients.

      now if the networking group would upgrade that area to 100/switched instead of 10/shared, we'd acually be using the SR1s =)

      --m

    2. Re:Sun Ray 1; 100; 150 - Thin Clients by Manuka · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Coupla comments - I just got a bid on 75 of these units with a server. $460, plus the $40 country kit. They *used* to be $400 total. Sun has actually increased the price on these since they came out.

      Also, the RCA port on those is *input*, not output. It's designed to hook in a SunCamera or somesuch composit source. The caveat is that the current version of the server software doesn't support that yet (Real Soon Now!).

      The motherboard is actually running a 110-MHz sun4m chip, the same that was in the JavaStations. 8MB of RAM onboard, only uses 2MB, but 8MB was the most cost-effective chip size they could get. For what this machine does, it's still overkill.

      As for never upgrading, the first-generation SunRay 1 units would smoke the power supply like clockwork after 9 months of usage, due to overheating problems. Sun has apparently resolved this.

      I recently pitched my boss on these, since the vast majority of our users have no need for a full-blown PC, and I spend 75% of my time dealing with desktop issues. That means a lot more expansion before having to hire another IT guy. Initially, we'll be using Citrix on the Sun machine, going back to Windows, but we have the option of kicking Microsoft to the curb, should we want to. The *capital* cost of these over the next several years is less than half that of continuing with a 3-year upgrade cycle on PCs, even after factoring in servers. They really liked the idea of being able to keep their work if the building lost power (sessions live on the server, which should have backup power)

      Another poster mentioned the SPOF issue, but SunRay server software works well in a clustered environment, as well as a multi-server environment.

    3. Re:Sun Ray 1; 100; 150 - Thin Clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I stand corrected, video NTSC/PAL, RCA connector for input, not out.

      The Sun Ray 100 (CRT) was the only one w/power supply issues, as I recall. Please try not to lump all three models into one discussion, thanks.

      Which model did you quote that was price increased? Again, there are three types....

      All three have recently gone thru a design refresh cycle. The LCD is the last of the three to be refreshed, and is being produced now.

      The CPU's were, and still are, 100MHz. RAM was and still is 4mb, but now it is integrated (EDO).

      MITAC made the original boards, where the latest generation offers more integration and is now being made by Sun.

      I have extras of both old and new at my desk if you need to take a look....

    4. Re:Sun Ray 1; 100; 150 - Thin Clients by Manuka · · Score: 2

      Nope, I was referring to the SunRay 1 specifically - We smoked more of those than i care to remember when i was working at Sun's Broomfield campus. Sun's interim solution was to take the wedges out of their plastic stands and lay them on their sides.
      All three models have seen price increases. The 150 is now $1400 (up from $1200), and the 100 is $960 (up from $800-850 or so)
      What was changed during the design refresh, and how do I identify a refreshed model?

    5. Re:Sun Ray 1; 100; 150 - Thin Clients by Pointer80 · · Score: 1

      If you have the time, I'd like to see the business case (numbers) for this and some details on how you're using the backend box to access the citrix server (solaris based metaframe client?; I'm not really that familiar with citrix). Where's the break even point (number of clients) for justifying the cost of redundant backend servers?

      -pointer (spamisbad@NOSPAM-catt.com)

      --
      [%- PROCESS life -%]
    6. Re:Sun Ray 1; 100; 150 - Thin Clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The primary change is that Sun is now making the main board, with as much chip shrinking and component intergration as possible.

      Also, things learned from the 1st gen, such as long term reliability and EMI testing have been folded in.

      We didn't manuf. the first gen Sun Ray 1's...we came in with the 100's and the 150's. We are now doing all Sun Ray production.

      I'd look for production dates for the Sun Ray 1 after March 2002...and manuf. sites in Korea.

  49. Yahoo Hiring Horrible Writers by Nintendork · · Score: 1

    I didn't even get that far before returning here to complain about the poor writing skills! I hope to god that writer has a backup career.

    The first sentence sets the ugly tone of incompetence.
    "How much would you give not to have show up at your desk every day?"

    The second paragraph keeps pace with a misplaced comma in what I guess he thought was a proper noun.
    "...follow them on the computer maker's network."

    The third paragraph isn't so bad.

    The infamous fourth paragraph. This is where I decided to hit the all mighty back button. What a confusing beginning to a run on sentence!
    "Sun says will save it $150 million annually, and the program is essentially an advertisement for the company's marketing pitch that business runs better on a network of big computers than smaller boxes powered by software from rival Microsoft Corp. "

    1. Re:Yahoo Hiring Horrible Writers by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      I knew I would screw something up and look like an ass . Replace "misplaced comma" in my previous comment with "misplaced apostrophe."

    2. Re:Yahoo Hiring Horrible Writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article was written by Reuters, not Yahoo!. Yahoo! merely publishes the articles from Reuters. Please point your high horse at Reuters.

    3. Re:Yahoo Hiring Horrible Writers by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I should also mention that I double checked on apostrophe usage and found that it doesn't have to be a proper noun. Damn my last english teacher!

    4. Re:Yahoo Hiring Horrible Writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that your only screw-up?

    5. Re:Yahoo Hiring Horrible Writers by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2
      "...follow them on the computer maker's network."

      misplaced apostrophe

      How is this a misplaced apostrophe? In this case, the apostrophe marks the possesive form of a singular noun. The network belongs to the computer-maker, so it's the computer-maker's network. If there were more than one computer-maker and they had a shared network, it would be the computer-makers' network, but we are talking about only one computer-maker (Sun Microsystems).

      I wholeheartedly agree that the article is poorly-written. The aforementioned sentence is awkward, even if grammatically correct. Adding a dash between "computer" and "maker" is not absolutely required, but is definitely recommended as it helps distinguish that the two words form one atomic noun. I'm guessing that the author calls Sun a computer-maker in order to introduce Sun to those who've never heard of Sun Microsystems; however, this is unnecessary given the intended audience. It also introduces an ambiguity (Sun is certainly a computer-maker, but some of its employees can also be considered computer-makers, in which case the apostrophe is indeed misplaced).

      My source code comments are better writing - and I'm an engineer, not a writer.

  50. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point, finding people would be a hassle.
    However, hotdesking is nothing new to large companies.. at a previous workplace, we had to "book" a seat when we got to work. This system also allows you to search for people.

    I'm not sure if it was an effective means of "getting people in early" though. Being totally mobile also implies that people should be able to telecommute and work from home.. And this isn't always a great idea.

  51. Dumb, dumb, dumb. by Snarfvs+Maximvs · · Score: 1

    Anyone else read Snowcrash? Didn't one of the characters who worked for the gov't work in a similar setup?

    Here's the kicker: I NEED my Kinesis. I also NEED my Wacom tablet. Without them I'd be in the hospital within a week.

    I'm glad my employer is smarter (and more profitable) than Sun.

    --
    -----------------------

    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

    1. Re:Dumb, dumb, dumb. by toast0 · · Score: 2

      what is to stop you from bringing your input devices with you? the sunray supports usb.

      i believe many of the people had an assigned office in one building, but they could use a desk in another some days to avoid some commuting or something, so maybe you wouldn't be able to use that feature of employment.

  52. $500 isn't that bad... by CurtisRWC · · Score: 1

    At first, the whole $500 thing might seem a bit pricey, especially since you can get a full blown PC for about as much (monitor included). However, the cost of installing, configuring, and deploying a PC ends up making it cost much more. Also, I doubt you will need to upgrade the terminals for a long, long time.

  53. SUN vs. PCChips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The M787 PCChips motherboard is quite comparable to that $500 slab.

    Size: Similar if one were to use a tiny micro-ATX case.
    USB Ports: Sunray 4, M787 4 (requires a case with 2 built in, not hard to find).
    10/100 bootable ethernet: Included on both.
    Input: Similar, however M787 requires an external smartcard reader ($50 investment).
    Video Input: Sunray - Yes. M787 - No.
    Video Out: Identical.
    Onboard Sound: Both have it.
    Weight: Could be similar. Depends on selection of case/PS.
    Sound Level: Sunray is possibly quieter -- by how much I am not sure (very little if anything).

    So, lets add up the figures:

    Sunray: $525.
    M787 Solution: $75 + $30 (case) + $50 (smartcard reader) + $30 (memory) = $185.

    The only difference is the M787 doesn't come with the specialized software to allow "roaming" and has no video input (why does a cubicle worker need that?).

    Basically, you're paying $340 for the software on the Sunray (I assume its included).

    Sorry to say it, but you'd save money by giving everyone their own separate windows/linux machine on their desk and setting up the traditional file server to share stuff on.

    That is, unless you plan to have more than half the staff without computers anyways.

  54. For sales people, not developers by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

    I've been a developer at Sun for about a year and a half now. I started when I was going to school in Worcester, Mass and commuting to Chelmsford. Soon enough though, they kicked all us developers out and moved us to Nashua, about an hour away. So 4 months ago I packed up and moved up here. Now we're being moved back right near Worcester, and I asked about the iWork program. I was basically told no, and here's why.

    The idea is basically that people who work in sales and marketing and stuff like that who travel a lot were using the predecessor of the iWork office, called simply a drop-in, more often then their "real" office anyway, so why bother reserving them space for a "home" office"? It's a nifty idea for them, but not for us. As developers, we need to be near the people we're developing with. I kinda aggree, but I still hate the commute, not to mention paying Mass taxes...

    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  55. So why come in? by Bartab · · Score: 1

    If there is no specific advantage to me being in a specific location, with a specific phone and reference books, notes, hardware, etc around me... Why should I come in at all? Telecommute

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    1. Re:So why come in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story was about Sun. You're describing IBM

      Keep them straight! :-)

  56. Disposable Employees by Crackerman111 · · Score: 1
    The system would seem custom-made for fast-growing companies, since a new employee can grab an I.D. card, find a free desk, and go. But Sun has really revved up the program since its own growth stalled, along with the Internet economy.

    Alright, so they can plug you into the system really quickly and get rid of you just as fast. I mean, we wouldn't want companies to be "inconvenienced" by those mass layoffs would we?

    1. Re:Disposable Employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think of this as a Beowulf cluster of employees. If one "node" needs to be replaced, no big deal. Replace their workstation and or the human work drone occupying the terminal and move on.

  57. Musical Layoffs by Acme+Mouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this is the new way that companies will do their layoffs.

    Take away 50 cubicles each day, and if there's no cubicle left for you when you get to work, well, you know what that means...

  58. Hide And Seek by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    I have a hard enough time keeping track of my team now that they sit all together. I would have to pack a lunch and a compass for code walk throughs in a situation like this.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  59. Cool Idea by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    So if I get there really early can I have McNealy's office or Zander's old offfice? And if I get their offices can I make the decisions for the day?

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  60. Cross Sun off the list by Monkelectric · · Score: 2
    of companies I'm willing to work for.

    Who does that leave?

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Cross Sun off the list by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      Hm, this definately counts as a strike against Sun, but after four long months of unemployment I'd work for the Prince of Darkness (Larry Ellison) if he was willing to pay well.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:Cross Sun off the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Want fries with that? Grow the fuck up.

    3. Re:Cross Sun off the list by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I don't think they wanted you anyway. P.S. I was never hotelled at Sun, it's only at places where the price of the real estate is sky high where they do have "flex" offices.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  61. MacDonalds sounds just right 4u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like you've just admitted to being a spoiled brat that doesn't deserve to hold a decent job....

    1. Re:MacDonalds sounds just right 4u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you offering a job?

      How did you become a McDonald's supervisor, anyhow?

      Enquiring minds want to know.

  62. Dumb Terminals nothing new. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    And Sun didn't just discover them. They've been using them for a long, long, long time.

    The SunRay, though, is different from your standard X-terminal.
    It's not an X-terminal.

    It's a remote framebuffer, smartcard reader, keyboard, mouse, and audio device.

    When you see an X screen on a sunray terminal, the X server is actually running on a Sun server somewhere, not on the workstation. You are only getting the display; hence there is 0 processing on the terminal, hence it can crash and you can just go to another and re-attach.

    This is nothing new, the SunRay has been out for years.

    1. Re:Dumb Terminals nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh heh, no shit.

      i still have 15 year old decnet jacks in the offices i support

    2. Re:Dumb Terminals nothing new. by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      I take it we would not be able to have a Boewulf cluster of these then. That is enough reason to have any discussion of them banned from /.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    3. Re:Dumb Terminals nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I am surprised by the "discovers" tag, the person who submitted this story obviously has no cluz.

      take another hit from that crack pipe boy...

  63. Well. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    It's solid state. It's entirely hot swappable (you can smash it with a bat, go to the next one, pop your smartcard in, and your session is intact)

    You could buy shit workstations for $500. Then you have to load them out with the software you want. Then you have maintenance.

    I *guarantee* that doing this with normal pc's will cost you more than double this.

  64. TWEEEEEEEET by infonography · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Foul called on account of driveling.

    I interviewed at Sun in '98 these where everywhere

    This is neither new nor interesting from a UNIX user's perspective. Only in the Windows world do you really really need a workstation of your own. The model they where using then was the JavaStaion these have been around since 1996 http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/9611/sunflas h.961114.html

    A thin client (Oracle/Larry Ellison propaganda aside) is a jumped up X-Term with a disk drive and maybe a local hard drive or large removable media. If you have a really skilled SysAdmin staff (I imagine Sun does) you can run all your regular UNIX customization & Window Makers on this, Gnome, Enlightenment, and even play Quake where ever your at in the whole world. Your not tied to hardware with can be stolen or virus'd

    So the workstation is $500 a pop, the CPU isn't just a local P-4 or something it's the front end for some big set of Mid-range or higher box like a Sunfire or SunCat or some other UNIX or even Microsoftie server.

    when somebody tells me about how cool their new Dell is and how well it can crunch that Excel, I just smile, I can have screensavers that are actual Fractals in real time. Wine sessions that out run the latest P4

    Ok, so the one you saw has got a little Grey Flannel Suit look to it, but you have to remember it's a company system. Sorry to be L33tist but if the bulk of your contact with a computer is 9-5 your going to have fish as your screensaver and a picture of your kids as your background.

    As we progress with the routine technical advancement your going to see a things like SUN 450 Enterprise w/Quad 480Mhz processors showing up on Ebay for $500, Likely in about 18 months

    Schools and small businesses are going to start wondering why they are being nibbled to death by Microsoft and Apple and the various shadowy and dodgy hardware vendors (Compaq, Dell, Packard Bell) and switch into where this setup is more common it will look more like the NAVI from Lain

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by khuber · · Score: 1
      Wow! Actual fractals!

      I doubt an E450 will be $500 in 18 months. But even so, a quad @480 already sucks ass compared to a current PC for desktop apps.

      Sorry, but I don't want to share.

      -Kevin

    2. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      even so, a quad @480 already sucks ass compared to a current PC for desktop apps.

      *Sigh*, another Intel troll. There's more to processor speed than raw clock MHz. Sparc processors (the sort found in Sun hardware) do more per clock cycle than an x86. Quad 480MHz UltraSparcs would blow a 2GHz Pentium out of the water...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    3. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just smile, I can have screensavers that are actual Fractals in real time.

      I can do that on my P3-600. What's your point?

      "Fractals" is such a broad category, it doesn't make a good benchmark.

    4. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by khuber · · Score: 2, Informative
      *Sigh*, another Intel troll. There's more to processor speed than raw clock MHz. Sparc processors (the sort found in Sun hardware) do more per clock cycle than an x86. Quad 480MHz UltraSparcs would blow a 2GHz Pentium out of the water...

      I work with Suns every day - 420s, 880s, 4800s, 6800s, ... They are not fast at CPU intensive tasks. We are talking desktop apps here, not web servers and so on. I understand the difference between single CPU PCs and multiple CPU, high I/O capacity servers.

      UltraSPARCs are not computationally very powerful. You're correct that you can't compare the clock speeds, but they still are not that fast -overall-, which is what matters, not efficiency (Mac PPC advocates make the same mistake). An UltraSPARC II at 480 is slow! Even a copper USIII at 750-900 MHz is not that fast. Yes, I believe a 1G UIII has a higher specfp than a P4 at 2GHz (correct me if I'm wrong), but it's slower at integer ops which are the basis of most desktop apps. And you can get P4s at 2.4GHz now. (IBM's Power4 is far superior to USIII, btw) But Sun servers are for server loads, which typically have higher I/O requirements than Excel, or even my developer tools (though admittedly IDE drives suck and I wish I had SCSI at work like I do at home).

      A quad setup is something you'd use for balancing server loads with lots of concurrent activity, not desktop apps which are "bursty" and benefit more from fast (dedicated) single processors. A 450 is a very small USII based system with a backplane that has less memory bandwidth than a current PC! Most of the Java server software I work on is deployed to 6800s. When you're talking about large shared Sun systems, there is a lot of scheduling overhead - something you don't want for interactive desktop apps even though the total amount of work a decent Sun system can do is much higher. The workload is just different.

      -Kevin

    5. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by sheldon · · Score: 2

      "Only in the Windows world do you really really need a workstation of your own."

      Exactly how do you figure?

      The company I work for has been using Windows NT for years and we essentially have the same setup. The desktops are the same throughout the company, and I can go to any of them and get my basic work done. All of your data, email, everything is stored out on the network drives and accessible from any computer in the company quite easily.

      I've been working out of two different buildings for the past 4 years with no problems and I'm certainly not using a laptop.

    6. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by Cato · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This only works in Windows where you have identical apps everywhere. Unix workstation setups can have all apps installed on servers but run on the clients, meaning that an engineer gets a unique set of apps when they log on to the same workstation just used by a manager.

      You probably have to see this to realise how much better it is than Windows.

    7. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. No. No. He could just be talking about roaming profiles or "Windows Terminal Server". Hard to tell.

    8. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by sheldon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually I have seen it the way you discuss. I was at Iowa State University and spent 4 years working with Project Vincent(a distributed environment based off the Project Athena work from MIT).

      Windows has evolved to the point that it is manageable in a very similar manner. With the introduction of Windows 2000, I could distribute applications to an end user on a needed basis.

      One of the fundamental problems that the Unix model you talk about has is that the files needed to run the application all reside on file servers. This results in two things. First, high network utilization, and second, decreased client performance.

      You can mitigate these issues slightly, but you never really solve them until you install the application files on the local client. You mention engineers, but don't seem to understand that these are the users who would be most impacted by this as many advanced applications consume large amounts of storage for their binary files.

      While at ISU our biggest issue in this regard was a GIS package from ESRI called Arc/Info. The binaries for this app consumed about 500 Megs of drive space all totaled. There was a considerable difference between loading this from local disk versus over a network drive. i.e. like 5 seconds versus 60 seconds on a DEC Alpha station. As such it made sense to install the application to local disk to maintain good performance.

      I guess I should also point out that the Windows world also used this same model with all apps residing on the file server back in the era of Windows 3.1. But again the network utilization and performance impact became signifigant constraints. With harddrive prices falling over time it became economically infeasible to continue to maintain this type of environment and the world switched at around the time of Win95/NT4.

      The point being it is not much better than it is in Windows, your solution happens to have some severe limitations which makes it impractical and inefficient.

      The Windows 2000 model whereby the desktops get a standard set of applications to start with and additional applications are pulled down on an as needed basis is really quite better.

    9. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by aquarian · · Score: 2
      Schools and small businesses are going to start wondering why they are being nibbled to death by Microsoft and Apple and the various shadowy and dodgy hardware vendors (Compaq, Dell, Packard Bell)

      Yeah, they can get nibbled to death by Sun instead!

    10. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While at ISU our biggest issue in this regard was a GIS package from ESRI called Arc/Info. The binaries for this app consumed about 500 Megs of drive space all totaled. There was a considerable difference between loading this from local disk versus over a network drive. i.e. like 5 seconds versus 60 seconds on a DEC Alpha station. As such it made sense to install the application to local disk to maintain good performance.
      Hmmm, using the Sun solution does not require downloading anything to the client box.
    11. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by noweb4u · · Score: 1

      What you were using was NFS. This is something entirely different where the programs are running on the server, and load faster than a mofo. All that goes across the net are the screen, sound, keyboard, and mouse. Kinda like a network based KVM.

    12. Re:TWEEEEEEEET by infonography · · Score: 1

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 02, @10:00PM (Score:0) (#3629201)

      I just smile, I can have screensavers that are actual Fractals in real time.

      I can do that on my P3-600. What's your point? "Fractals" is such a broad category, it doesn't make a good benchmark.

      Yes of course, but that was a embedded troll (trademark pending), and it was noted as a troll, unless they caught the Packard Bell Referance.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  65. flex time? by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it promotes flex time, which means that parents can go to soccer games and workers can go to the office nearest them when there is a problem with trying to commute.

    Why can't people with dedicated offices work flex time? Or is the idea that Sun now has fewer terminals than employees (to save money), thus forcing people to work staggered shifts?

    1. Re:flex time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they can, but when they are away, their hard resources are idle.

      It's like using a school library for cub scout meetings in the evening....when a dedicated resource is only used for a limited amount of time, the ROI for the entire business/community is much lower.

      Would it make sense to only use a taxi or subway for 8 hours each day? When they are parked, they are of no use to anyone.

  66. Good idea ruined by bad hygene by kawika · · Score: 2

    Slashdot just told us that workstations are dirtier than toilets and now Sun wants people to share them on a regular basis? Be sure to bring a can of Lysol in your briefcase.

    1. Re:Good idea ruined by bad hygene by tg_schlacht · · Score: 1

      Yeah, especially since many places don't see the sense in an employee staying home when they aren't so sick they're about to collapse. By the time you know you really do have the flu and not just a cold you've left enough germs around to infect a lot of your co-workers. They get an extra day or two out of one of their workers and then lose 1+ week times N employees who were unfortunate enough to be exposed to someone who should have stayed home in the first place.

    2. Re:Good idea ruined by bad hygene by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      Slashdot just told us that workstations are dirtier than toilets [slashdot.org] and now Sun wants people to share them on a regular basis? Be sure to bring a can of Lysol in your briefcase.

      So now GW will have to create a new category of guest worker visa for the hordes we will need to import from the UK to work as phone sanitisers.

  67. I have set these up. by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 1

    ppl seem to slamming these, but they are assuming everybody is running on these, and that is WRONG, ITS JUST THE SALES FORCE, you know the ppl that only on into the office once a week for team meetings or what have you.
    why have a desk for your mobile sales force when you only need 1/5th the space at any given time?
    this is sun's solution and its pretty sweet, works perfect for a sales force.

    this is prolly the best branded solution I can sell, everything i do is "custom".
    I am every happy with the sunrays that are the thin clients, and the sunray server software, every slick, now i am just hoping for a linux port of that software :p

    1. Re:I have set these up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ITS JUST THE SALES FORCE

      Not true. I work in a product engineering group at Sun and we are being converted to "Flex" (as it is called).

      > this is sun's solution and its pretty sweet, works perfect for a sales force.

      Agreed. For a sales force. However, it makes little sense for product design folks for whom random hallway encounters are an important part of the process. Just as important as being able to round up an adhoc group for a code review or dropping in to pick someone's brain on a thorny techinical issue. It is assumed all these interactions can happen on the phone (or a speakerphone in a conference room). Personally, I think everything will take twice as long as before.

      Yes, the Sunrays with the smartcards are pretty cool (they work with Linux servers too) but living out of a locker is something I left behind at college and have no wish to return to.

  68. GAH! by Rhinobird · · Score: 2

    Sun has turned normal office work into something more like a call center sweatshop. Damnit! When I was doing tech support, I had to 'share' my desk with 400 other agents. I NEVER sat in the same place twice for something like 2 and a half years. And boy is that a killer on the old moral. Now those Sun folk have to deal with traffic, an empty coffee pot at work and now they have to fight each other for desks. Oh well...at least I don't work there.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  69. I'm gonna bet... by Skim123 · · Score: 2

    ... that no matter how early you arrive you cannot take Scott McNealy's office. Bleh, the big wigs that push these things through to "save costs" and encourage the grunts to get in earlier should have to play by the same rules! :-)

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    1. Re:I'm gonna bet... by acoopersmith · · Score: 2

      ... that no matter how early you arrive you cannot take Scott McNealy's office.

      Yep. And no matter how early you arrive, you can't have mine either, even though I often don't show up until 11am, and I'm a mere low-level engineer. As the article said, only about half the company is on this system - for some types of jobs it makes sense, for others it doesn't. (Besides, I turned down the SunRay since I don't have room with the Sparc 20, Ultra 10, & SunBlade 100 already in my office.)

  70. Slashdot Discovers Dumb Headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes. indeed. lameness filter

  71. I guess it works for everyone by Shirloki · · Score: 1

    A library near me even uses this for search terminals. They all log into a central X server. Interestingly enough, the internet terminals are all WindowsNT boxes.

  72. Sun Rays are cool... by adam613 · · Score: 1

    But not THAT cool.

    They're a bit smarter than dumb terminals. But I have a feeling I'd either go nuts or quit fairly quickly in a setup like this. I like the feeling of being able to go to work in the morning, and sit at my desk where I always sit. Yes, I'm a sheep.

    Besides, I bet the've got a Fire 15k serving these. You can do MUCH cooler things with a 106 CPU server than serve thousands of frame buffers :-P

  73. My personal experience.... by Da_man · · Score: 1

    I have implemented a few of these solutions, and guess what they work!!! And what's more there is still that lovely jaw dropping sound when you first demostrate the smart card bit. They are a great solution, but perhaps not for everyone.

    Where I have found them to be very useful is College and School campus's (Sp?). As a student I would have loved the ability to do my projects, feel the need for a coffee an a bite to eat, stroll down the the cafeteria, and check up on my stuff from there.

    Another way they are being used is providing a centralised Sun SPARC compute resource for Post Graduate & Doctorate students in labs and offices all over the campus. Check out http://www.bcs.ie/tipperaryinstitute.pdf .

    Regards,

    JB

  74. Wow. by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to say.. if you are having problems like that, then two things are happening.

    - You don't have adequate resources to handle what you are doing
    - Your administrators have no idea how to maintain large sun servers. You should NOT have reboots that frequently. Once or twice a year, if that is adequate.

    You can't measure a system based on the cost per workstation alone.
    What about software? Maintenance? Etcetera?

    Maintaing a network of PCs is HUGELY expensive compared to a network of sunray machines.

    Six hundred bucks per workstation? I've seen sunrays for a fraction of that. Those must be the ones with built in displays.

    If you say sun claimed one e4500 (or whatever oyu have with 16 processors) could handle 700 desktops, I'd say you, or whoever told you that, is lying, or didn't understand what they said. THat is such outrageous bullshit I can't believe even sun would say that. You'd need an E10k loaded out to the nuts to even *maybe* do that.

    Also, did you have sun factor in the applications you would be running? You see...

    If you tell sun precisely what you want, they will give you a price *and deliver*

  75. Better link by laura20 · · Score: 1

    The link above is just a brief summation, you can get the full story at:

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.02/chiat_pr .h tml

  76. Preview was OK but /. cut off after my ampersand.. by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2

    I can see this working for my company but only for certain job functions. I'm sure that Sun isn't implementing this across the board for all their employees. I think this might work well at my company for inside sales, technical support, and in conjunction with a beefy PDA even for outside sales. Basically anything that doesn't require storing piles of stuff someplace or leaving parts laying out for extended periods.

    As for being able to talk to people you work with in person, this system will enable personal teleconferencing with an optional camera. And if you still want to be face to face how about browsing to a webpage on your intranet that displays a floorplan highlighting everyone in your department? You could also search by name. You would be registered automatically when you swipe your card in the reader.

    Besides people will automatically congregate together based on physical location and habit. For example, Marketing people might head for the open cubes near the color copier while Engineers would look first for an open cube near the R+D lab. And everyone is going to want to be near people they hang around with so they can take breaks or go to lunch with friends.

    Also inter-personal conflicts will work themselves out since workers can relocate easily. So the hot girl in Accounting can avoid that creepy MSCE guy and move closer to her hunky Unix god. ;)

  77. I would hate working there by Daimaou · · Score: 1

    I worked at a large company a number of years ago who did essentially the same thing. They had a similar set up to the one in this article only using PCs instead of dumb terminals. Every computer in each section was exactly the same and you just got whichever one was assigned to you each day. Thus, no family photos, desktoys, personal storage, customized wallpaper, customized desktop, etc. They chose to do this because there were three shifts that worked there and they thought this setup would work to minimize hardware and support costs.

    This lasted for about three months. Morale was bad, people's productivity was at an all time low and the attrition rate soared. After that they assigned each employee a desk, which was shared with two other people who worked on other shifts. Each employee was assigned a locking drawer and was allowed to make temporary customizations to their work area during their shift. It still wasn't the best work environment, but it was better than what is described in this article.

    I think they will make a change fairly soon.

  78. Hi, I'm a moderator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and when I find posts about slightly non-obvious ideas that I didn't think of, I mod them down.

    Idiot

    1. Re:Hi, I'm a moderator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you get your mod points meta-moded away.

  79. We had this in IBM by jsse · · Score: 2

    Not in US, though, in an asian city where office space were expensive. They locked us up in a tight room where no. of 3270 terminals is much less than no. of interns, contracts and supplementary staffs(yes, they called us supplementary) in this room. If you were late and couldn't find a terminal then you must search thru the building for an unused one "there's always one out there" they said.

    It worked as the PHBs expected - in the beginning. In order to fight for a terminal which had no blind spot on the green screen and keyboard with no defective keys we had come up with all the dirty tricks a human could imagine. Some people took the aggressive approach like splitting on the keyboards and claimed that they had got some incurable infectable disease, some took a rather defensive tactics like taking sleep beds to office and stayed in the room overnight just to get a working terminal until their projects done; some are very organizational who formed gangs to create their own 'district' where no others could cross the lines to approach their terminals.

    We could tolerate this because we didn't have the concept of 'sweatshop' and we didn't usually sue our employers here, but I'm sure those PH-cluebies finally learnt when all the good people left.

    Finally Sun is catching up with this. :)

  80. Discrimination by Ozwald · · Score: 1

    First, giving priority to the people to arrive first is discrimination. My only defence would be to stay all night and doze off on the keyboard so that all early rising jerks have to suffer with the cubes without windows.

    Ozwald

  81. shopping cart by slam+smith · · Score: 1

    Do they issue new employees a shopping cart to put all thier stuff in when they hire a new employee. I'm certain of one thing, I wouldn't keep near as many reference books at work as I do now.

  82. No thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing how some of my co-workers take care of their offices and terminals, I would want no part of this. I am not a huge fan of typing on a keyboard that a co-worker just got done eating over and then typing on after defecating and "forgetting" to wash their hands. Not to mention that a few of my co-workers tend to leave that "not-so-fresh" aroma behind them everywhere they go.

  83. What about the hardware? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    At my office we've all got different keyboard/mouse/trackball/headphone preferences. We all run two monitors, but placement and all-'round ergonomics vary greatly. Maybe the next company to try this will make the user hardware some sort of detachable module for reasons of efficiency, RSI and sanitation?

    And under Sun's plan, how much time is alloted to pneumatic chair adjustments every time you grab a new desk?

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  84. GREAT IDEA!! NO OFFICE POLITICS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With office equipments and personalized desk space, people become territorial and lazy. They waste time playing office politics to defend their turf. What the heck, get rid of the office ends office politics.

  85. Dumb terminals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Michael doesn't seem to realize the difference between a dumb terminal (No control characters) and a thin client (Essentially a fancy X terminal)...

    News for nerds? Maybe... news by nerds? Hell no.. These guys are as close to being nerds as I am to being a kung fu master.

  86. Working Better Link by pgrote · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sigh ...

    Working Link

  87. Re:stupid comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >You see the glass half empty. A pessimist can find things wrong with a sunset.

    You asked, you shall be given.

    Flex-time, when applied to low-income housing, means being out of work. When most people are out of work crime increases.

    Same thing with computers that are used randomly.

    At college I see most student stations (used randomly) are full of pen marks, highlighter, broken LEDs, and bits of disks stuffed in floppy drives. Teachers' stations are never vandalized (unless you call a sticker or two vandalization) because the more damage they do to the workstation, the less likely the boss will promote them. And, of course, the guy at the top that can't be promoted any more realises how he got there, and realises that if he looks like a goon (vandalized desk/computer) he'll lose customers and his job.

  88. we have these at my school by RelliK · · Score: 2

    They are actually really cool. You stick the card in (I think they once called it a "java card"), log in and start working. Open a bunch of terminals, vi, debugger, etc., then pull out the card. It goes back to the login screen. Take the card to another terminal and plug it in. The desktop is restored to *exact same* state you left it: vi is still running with your file loaded, the gdb is still waiting at the same step, netscape shows the same page -- everything is *exacly* in the state you left it. And it takes about 2 seconds for it to "boot". The terminals apparently support sound too, though I've never tried it.

    It would be even cooler if it worked reliably though. The server that ran the lab full of SunRays had to be rebooted every night because of memory leaks. Apparently the login screen was the culprit. As far as I know they are still rebooting it. :-)

    But basically, if they got the reliability problems fixed (and I assume they did), then this box is probably worth the money. The terminal, monitor, keyboard and mouse will essentially last forever. All the code runs on a server, so you don't need to worry about upgrading it. Yet at the same time, they are basically expendable: if one breaks, plug another one in and you're back to work in 1 minute. Plus you have the extreme mobility I mentioned above. Plus you have centralized data storage and easy backups....

    In contrast, PCs need to be upgraded every 2-3 years. They are tied to a particular user. They need to be supported and maintained. If there is a virus/HD breaks/fire/whatever you lose all the data stored on the PC. The cost of maintenance is very very high.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    1. Re:we have these at my school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound works fine, and as with anything else, you can remove your session card and go to the next desk and continue to listen to the song =)

      >It would be even cooler if it worked reliably >though. The server that ran the lab full of SunRays >had to be rebooted every night because of memory >leaks. Apparently the login screen was the culprit. >As far as I know they are still rebooting it. :-)

      Perhaps they shouldnt be admins for that machine then. We have a sunray server onsite which has been up for 100 days now without reboot. One of the main tricks of avoiding memory leaks with sunray is to comment out the local display in /etc/dt/config/Xconfig file.

      I think there is a case on sunsolve according to this, and aswell, it's fixed in version 1.3 of the server software.

    2. Re:we have these at my school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have implemented this in my company. It really
      works as they said. The real saving is not in the
      price of hardware but in the maintanance costs.
      We have several offices around south or Russia, a
      few of them do not have any IT staff. Everything
      is managed remotely. We will surely invest into
      this technology even more (we did not integrate
      PBX with SunRays yet).

      It's an excellent staff. I surely recommend it.

  89. it's mostly positive with one huge negative by merc_sa · · Score: 1


    positives:

    1. fewer specialized configured desktops
    (did you just format my hard drive which
    has the calendar for the entire department
    for the next give years?!)
    2. less hardware disappearing. Can't use most
    of the parts on the Sunray in your home PC
    and wouldn't work w/o a sunray server. This
    makes the less scrupulous less tempted to
    steal hardware from the company.
    (I came in last night, and my U10 is gone!)
    3. less hardware issues to troubleshoot.
    No dying hard disks, CPUs, CPU fans, cables
    etc. If you suspect the hardware put a
    new sunray in, user up in a few minutes.
    4. Keeps the impatient from getting in trouble
    by rebooting their system, even if the cause
    is a NIS server outtage rather than their
    desktop.

    Negatives:

    1. Single point of failure! Sunray server
    freezes, you can end up with several buildings
    of people sitting on their hands.
    This problem negates all of the positives,
    if the sunray server develops a problem
    that you can not resolve quickly or get the
    parts quickly, you're in a world of hurt
    productivity wise.

    the Sunray field office configuration works
    for 90% of the people, and 75% will be happy with
    it. the other 15% typically wants to do funky
    with the system instead of doing real work.
    the last 10% won't be happy no matter what you
    give them anyways, so screw them.

    Being able to personalize a space does make
    people happier. But some people personalize
    their space and system to the point of
    distraction (all those damn illegal mp3 servers,
    and playing games rather than working).

    It's much easier to convince your boss to
    let you log in from a building closer to home
    a few days a week, saving some commute and
    aggravation.

    PC are an administrative mess, it's the option
    of the worst sort.

    --
    -- I have enough stupid gadgets to know that I can do without -- http://www.modestneeds.org
    1. Re:it's mostly positive with one huge negative by HalifaxPenguin · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a company that brought in a bunch of SunRays for most of the staff. When the SunRay server freezes/goes-down (and it does) it means everyone (except the sys admins) got a surprise coffee break. It was quite refreshing. :)

      ...But to add to the negatives list, there were CPU problems, and they usually fell into one of two categories. 1) run-away netscape (4.x) processes consuming more and more resources bringing the system to a crawl, and 2) At any given time there were a number of stations running screensavers, slowing down the system for the rest of us trying to work.

      Now, that was at a time when Mozilla could be described as slow and buggy, and Netscape 4.x was what everyone was using on the SunRays. ...Which is why most people kept their pre-SunRay PC w/ Windows, so they could use Office & IE... which is why so many SunRays sat there doing nothing but running screensavers. With Mozilla and StarOffice 6 to offer, it might not be so bad anymore.

  90. Re:Dumb, dumb, dumb. indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else read Snowcrash?

    Hmmm... This idea failed in a work of fiction, therefore it will fail in real life.

    The logical mind boggles.

  91. Is this possible w/ linux/XFree? by sydlexic · · Score: 1

    I'd like to save the state of an X session from one machine and transfer it to another.

    1. Re:Is this possible w/ linux/XFree? by trentfoley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Give vnc a try. Its not the fastest or most secure thing, but it has served me very well. You assign an X screen number when starting the server and connect with :. When you disconnect, the session stays alive until the vncserver is shut down. You can connect to it from anywhere you have vncviewer.

    2. Re:Is this possible w/ linux/XFree? by sydlexic · · Score: 1

      doesn't this require a video card + monitor somewhere? the idea is to eliminate the physical server screen.

    3. Re:Is this possible w/ linux/XFree? by trentfoley · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the vnc home page:

      Many of us, for example, use a VNC viewer running on a PC on our desks to display our Unix environments which are running on a large server in the machine room downstairs.

      I do something pretty similar except I stay in the *nix environment unless on my laptop. Sure, vnc can be used like a "pcanywhere" tool, but it is much more.

      I never have an X desktop on a server since I rarely have a monitor and mouse attached. But, I do have a video card in the server, usually a cheap S3. I configure XFree86 for the video card and use vncserver to create virtual X screens. Often, I will have two different vncservers running, one in kde, another in windowmaker. I start and stop these as needed via ssh. The virtual X sessions are not displayed anywhere on the server. Each instance of vncviewer, on whatever platform, can display a virtual screen. According to the docs, you can even have multiple vncviewers displaying on the same screen. However, this I have never had a need to try. That might just push me over the edge.

    4. Re:Is this possible w/ linux/XFree? by phaze3000 · · Score: 2

      Both KDE and Gnome have session management features. Note that the applications you are using have to support them though..

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    5. Re:Is this possible w/ linux/XFree? by talmage · · Score: 1

      An equally interesting question is: Are the SunRays compatible with vnc?

  92. a programmer is an assembly line worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the assembly line is moving to india. Something tells me that Raj and Sanjeej and Poohbootsmellyass don't have a "touch of personality" in the office.

  93. Geez, I hate crap like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People like a desk. People like a place that can be labelled "theirs". Why the f**k do businesses insist on trying to dehumanise their workforce?



    It's no wonder I intend to make as much money as I can while I'm young, and then give employers the big finger when I've made a fortune.

    1. Re:Geez, I hate crap like this by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      Because they can, and they think it will save them money. It does bring in the concept of substituting someone for yourself. If you are working at a desk, for a large company, with only your id tag to swipe in a slot, all you have to do is farm out your job to someone else at a percentage of the going rate. Do this more than once, and you could be making a nice profit.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

  94. You're fired....! by snilloc · · Score: 1

    ... Now clean out your cu- oh wait... Just get the hell out!

  95. The future of computing? by Dunkalis · · Score: 1

    This is EXACTLY what I believe. We will all buy $600 dollar basic wireless servers, and terminals in which we login. I could, for example, have a flat-screen, keyboard, small CD drive, mouse, speakers/headphones, and a small hub in which all this would connect. And my parents could have a laptop with all of the features I would have, just in a laptop. We would all use the same hard drive, processor(s), and internet connections. Like X terminals, but far more advanced. All of this could be wireless and connect to your palm for when you leave the house. Imagine all that...Sun is probably on to something here...

    --
    Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
  96. irony by trelaneopn · · Score: 1

    it's interesting how everything works in circles, 20 years ago everyone had dumb terminals using a central unix server, well here we are again, ain't life grand? A butterfly flaps it's wings, and sun switches to dummy terminals, it's really really profound when you think about it.

    --
    a bit more about me http://www.advogato.org/person/trelane/ or my private page http://trelane.net
  97. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's really all neither here nor there, considering that King is now dead at 54... we'll never know the real truth.

  98. Re:stupid comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "...At college I see most student stations (used randomly) are full of pen marks, highlighter, broken LEDs...."

    It seems you go to school with a bunch of petty vandals.

    When you get out into the real world and work for a reputable company with *gasp* Professionals, petty vandalism usually decreases.

    Don't equate Professionals with the mouth breathers at Trailer Trash U.

    P.S. Note the use of the term "Professional", this should head off any idiot who would have been offended by the use of the term "Adult", although, in the above situation, they could most likely be used interchangeably. Trailer Trash U isn't big on acting like adults.

  99. Re:Real brilliant. (It is at least a step in the r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thin clients/dumb terminals are fine when it comes to day-to-day work. But "hotelling" people around to different work spots every day just doesn't make good buisness sense. Here we leave the arguement of dumb terminal/thin client vs. desktop and move into a completely different area, industrial psychology. Yes, a lot of HR people have degrees specifically in this rather narrow branch of the social sciences. Oddly though, most companies don't consult the people who actually study the dynamics of company performance vs. floorplan layout, but rather tend to go with the idea that the boss "thinks will work". There are specific situations where "hotelling" makes a great deal of sense, but they are far and few between. Read the literature and study the data on the subject before making this kind of decision. I've seen hotels work in situations such as telemarketing firms, where all the employee does is read a script over and over all day long (ah my first job..., mcdonalds would have been more satisfying, lol), but I've seen it absolutely ruin the productivity of programmers.

    Here's an example without going to the literature: have you ever been in school in a class where seats were not assigned? Did people typically claim ownership of seats anyway? The human is inheriently an animal that seeks its own space. Have you ever had a class where you were each day assigned a completely new seat based upon when you arrived? There is probably a reason for this.

  100. TTU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....great humor...and right on.

    Problem is, the target audience for your all-too-valid points need to stand on chairs lest it goes over their heads. Pearls before swine kind of thing me thinks....

    TTU...I luv it... :)

  101. I bet this idea came from by asv108 · · Score: 2

    A Senior executive in a nice corner office with 2 big windows and a personal secretary. These directives only create resentment towards management unless executives are willing to work under the same conditions. I sincerely doubt Scott McNealy is working in one of these cubes with a dumb terminal.

  102. like some whine w/your cheese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's good to be King!

    Work hard and complain less and you might be higher on the food chain. In the mean time, shut the fish up!

    1. Re:like some whine w/your cheese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot.

      The phrase is, "Would you like some cheese with that whine?" The user has already offered up a whine; reversing it, as you have done, makes no sense.

      Go back to your meager fucking existence. People like you make me utterly, utterly ill - not only have you been ass-fucked by capitalism, you took it with a grin.

      "It's not enough that you burn..." --Friedman

  103. SPOF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That server has redundant power supplies, RAID, mirrors and round-the-clock monitoring. Find something else to worry about, 'cause losing one of those babies is not it.

    1. Re:SPOF? by merc_sa · · Score: 1


      corrupted boot disk got mirrored to the other
      boot disk. network interface glitch brought
      down cluster causing cluster to not failover
      correctly. 4 hours lost. real case.

      still think you redundant power supply is worth anything?

      --
      -- I have enough stupid gadgets to know that I can do without -- http://www.modestneeds.org
  104. apples and oranges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, multiply all of this by, oh say 200 units, and know that Sun will heavily discount the terminals on a per unit basis, and do the calculations again. What...half price for the Sun Rays? Oh, of course....enterprise math.

    You lose. And that's my point....you should not have made the comparison in the first place. No one buys one of these things. It's clear that making such a comparison in the first place labels you as off the mark in understanding the basic elements of the topic.

    And I'm sorry you have to support 'stupid' people and work with sub-standard hardware. Better luck next lifetime, I guess.

    Sun Ray comes in three models...headless...15" LCD and 17" CRT.

    Again, it's all in the numbers, and no one buys just one.

  105. Real cost savings is building space by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    I talked to our Sun FE and he said Sun discovered so many of their employees work in the field that only 30% of the office space is in use at any one time. So by going to this unassigned office model they are able to reduce office space they rent and can close some facilities.

  106. Doh by bihoy · · Score: 1

    de-hu-man-ize
    Pronunciation: (dE-hyOO'mu-nIz" or, often, -yOO'-), [key]
    --v.t., -ized, -izing.
    to deprive of human qualities or attributes; divest of individuality: Conformity dehumanized him. Also, esp. Brit.,de-hu'man-ise".

    1. Re:Doh by pedro · · Score: 2

      I didn't mean to be a jerk.
      Your post really worked. The notion of it seeming clueless to the /. unwashed really bothered me, since it WAS a smart comment.
      Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference round these parts..

      --
      Brak: What's THAT?
      Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
  107. Book shelves? by dpt · · Score: 1

    So, who would move my large, and full, book shelf every single day?

    This strategy is clearly completely brain-dead.

  108. Hygiene by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    If you're going to have a fully roaming office where people work at any computer that happens to be convenient then you need:

    Computers dedicated for people with normal skin

    Computers dedicated for people with greasy skin

    Computers dedicated for women with hand cream addiction

  109. I worked in that office... by SlashChick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm tempted to post anonymously, but since this is now in my past, I won't.

    I actually worked in Sun's San Francisco flex office (the one that is mentioned in the article.) I have a lot of stories, both good and bad, about this way of working. First, let me start with a bit of an explanation.

    On one of Sun's internal websites, there is a Java applet where you go to reserve workspaces. People like me who didn't have a "real" office were allowed to reserve 14 days in advance for up to 5 consecutive days. Others were allowed to reserve anything that was left. So it's not as much of a potshot as you might imagine -- I was in the office 4-5 days a week and most of the seats weren't even reserved. You could reserve at home through Sun's remote access, so it wasn't like there was a huge line building up at 7AM or something.

    I can tell you the pros and cons, but I'm biased because I absolutely hated it. I hated the formulaic offices, and I hated that personal decorations were frowned upon. But the thing that really drove me crazy was that we were expected to use the UNIX terminals in lieu of any Windows or Macintosh laptop that we might have available. In fact, I was asked to give up my laptop because it looked bad for me to have a laptop on my desk and not be using my Solaris workstation (I had a real workstation because I tested websites on different browsers on Solaris.) The whole thing made me extremely bitter toward the company and was one of the main reasons for me leaving. I feel that it's hypocritical to hire a web developer who is used to using Photoshop, a nice solid text editor, and Dreamweaver, throw that developer in front of vi and the Gimp, and expect that web developer to be as productive as before.

    However, if you could get all your work done on Solaris, it worked out well. Most of the non-technical people got used to CDE (!) and were fine with a Netscape window. If all you need is Netscape, Star Office, and a couple of other applications, then sure -- a flex office is beneficial. A friend of mine still works out of that office, but she's not there very often, which is the whole point. She works all over the Bay Area and doesn't seem to mind giving up the development applications of a Windows or Macintosh machine. Then again, she isn't a developer...

    I think whether you like these offices or not depends on your personality. I must admit that Sun pulled it off well -- it's a solid implementation. The applet on the website shows you where person X is at any given moment, and you can forward your phone extension anywhere, even to a cell phone or to your home phone, so you're never out of touch. I had a real problem with it because I am a highly creative person who requires certain applications that simply aren't available on Solaris. This, and the lack of office decorations, really threw me out of my comfort zone, and I know I wasn't the only one. Apparently, however, I was in the minority. (I suppose the others who hated it, many of whom were my startup-personality friends, also left.)

    I hesitate to just bash on Sun since I know that it was more of a personality clash than a bad implementation, but to anyone who is considering this: the creative minds in your company will hate it. I'm talking about the people with their offices/cubicles decorated with every imaginable sticker and toy -- the ones who treat their office as a second home. These are often some of your most productive and worthy employees, so be sure to listen to their needs.

    This article really struck a nerve with me. It brought back all the frustration I had with working in that office. I can only hope that the others like me have had their complaints heard or, like me, have left for greener pastures. To the rest of you -- stick with the small-group (2-3 person offices). That was the environment in which most of us thrived.

    -- I left Sun in May.

    1. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is: I really feel for you, and I think I'd have done the same. I can write my code from any computer (even Macs) that has a SSH client (I'm primarily a Unix developer and do most of my writing in vim), but would I? No. I need a place where I can think. If you plant me in a new place everyday, I'll spend a few hours *adjusting* to the place before I can get any useful work done. Oh yes, you can give me the option of working from home as well, I'd like that. But if you want to keep me in an office 8 hours a day, bite the bullet and get me a *proper* office!

      There's a very good book on the subject, called PeopleWare by Tom DeMarco, where they examine productivity gains made by individual offices etc.

      I'd also like to know if Sun treats its core developers (the people who develop Solaris and Java) this way. Somehow I'd be surprised if they do.

      I'd just like to add this: lots of developers I know (and I) would just hate the thought of marching in every morning and looking for a place to sit. No permanency, no constancy. I wouldn't expect loyalty from employees after treating them like this.

      The New Economy is all very well, but there are some things -- like offices, personal decorations, etc -- the Old Economy did *right*.

    2. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I didn't like it because I couldn't use my wysiwyg tools and coding (if you call it that) html in vi was oh so hard.

      get over it winney bitch, sun sells hardware not stupid web pages. You were company overhead good thing you quit before the canned you.

    3. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds pretty odd to me. The web team where I work get Macs and PCs as they need them. I'm pretty doubtful that you were employed as a web developer or in any creative role and weren't given the tools to do your job. That's totally against the philosophy in the UK.

      A lot of people stil have laptops - some are Linux, some Solaris x86, some Windows. You can use these as you wish, but Outlook and XP are banned. People who need a fixed desk - administrators of the secretary kind for example - get a fixed desk. Others have 'neighbourhoods'.

      Where I work, we are all in a new building so the move was pretty easy as everyone was in a new environment. It also works very well, particularly for those of us who often work all over the place, or who have colleagues from other offices visit and need a 'virtual office space'.

      When we were all told we were going to have to go 'hot desk' a lot of us were very cynical, but I've been very pleasantly surprised - it works well.

    4. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember everyone.... highly creative == Spoiled brat.

      this is evident in the massive ego stroking he/she is doing to themselves..

      Sheesh, yes ego person, you CAN get your job done well with Gimp and Sceti (a text editor that rocks the world and is FREEEEEEE!)

      as for needing Dreamweaver.....

      Newbie... the best sites are written by hand and only a wannabe uses crap like dreamweaver.

    5. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > sun sells hardware not stupid web pages.

      Stupid web pages? Do you even know how much it takes to create a decent web page layout that looks cool beyond a geek audience and remains standard compliant? Oh, you're probably one of those who think sourceforge.net's (or worse, gnu.org's) layout looks cool. Forget stuff like DreamWeaver (which is nice to have but not strictly necessary -- emacs is good enough), but do image manipulation without Photoshop? Vector drawings without Freehand (or CorelDraw, my old fav)? And please, please don't point to the gimp and pathetic loser programs like kIllustrator -- gimp for serious design sucks rotten eggs. So much for you and your disdain for wysiwyg tools.

      > sun sells hardware

      And yeah -- sun is increasingly realizing that selling hardware is not enough. Customers are looking for solutions and IBM on the one hand and Wintel on the other are beating them black and blue in the enterprise markets, especially now that the .com umbrella is no more. The entire ONE strategy is based on selling a solution, not just boxes+OS.

      And finally, ad hominem attacks by Anonymous Cowards are pathetic.

    6. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hate to burst your bubble, but I, too, am a highly creative person and I'd have no troubles adapting to that environment... Why? Because I'm TRULY a creative person. I can make the best out of any situation, whether it's intrinsically to my liking or not. Same goes for tools. A truly creative person can figure out how to use any given set of tools. YOu might lose some productivity while learning the new tools, but the fact is, I don't think you honestly gave it the chance. You're probably one of those people who thought everything sucked ("Why did they have to change things?? whine whine whine I have to have dreamweaver blah blah I just *can't* work in this manner...")

    7. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I had a real problem with it because I am a highly creative person who requires certain applications that simply aren't available on Solaris. "

      If you are so creative, what's your solution?

    8. Re:I worked in that office... by Kiwi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But the thing that really drove me crazy was that we were expected to use the UNIX terminals in lieu of any Windows or Macintosh laptop that we might have available. In fact, I was asked to give up my laptop because it looked bad for me to have a laptop on my desk and not be using my Solaris workstation

      The fact that Sun asked you to do this gives me a good deal of respect for who Sun is and what they stand for. While I have my own issues with Sun (having to do with the fact that Solaris barfs on code which every free *NIX can handle); I respect them for making OpenOffice available, and for striving to make *NIX the standard desktop environment for their users.

      Now, of course, if I was your manager, I would let you use Windows, a Macintosh, or whatever else makes you productive. While I do respect people who are able to be productive in a strict *NIX environment more than people who need to use something else to get their work done, I understand that Linux is not for everyone.

      As one of the other people who posted a follow-up pointed out, Windows is a real roach motel. You have made a decision to not learn how to use the proprietary tools well enough to be productive with them. As a result, you are stuck using Windows or a Mac to do productive work. People who can be productive with libre software tools and not tied down to any particular OS environment.

      I have no problem using a Windows desktop, since the free software tools I use have been ported to this environment. All I need is a Windows machine with a net connection to get something very close to my Linux environment again.

      Nor do I have any problem being productive in MacOS X, which is a single terminal window away from being essentially identical to my Linux setup.

      Solaris can be made productive by a simple visit to sunfreeware

      . Other proprietary Unices have similiar binary ports sites.

      Of course, I prefer working in Linux; it is nice to know that I can fix small annoyances like this one as needed. An option I do not have with proprietary software.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    9. Re:I worked in that office... by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      Hmmm.

      With all due respect for your talents, it sounds like you should never have been hired for the job in the first place. It seems pretty clear that you're not a Unix person, and have no intention of being one. Does your resume' say "web developer' or 'pc-based web developer?'

      Also, you mention (multiple times!) that you had a problem with this because you're a creative person. Oh, poor sensitive creative person! The world is so much more difficult for you!

      I'm sorry, but that's how it sounds.

      All of that said, I can certainly see the drawbacks. I'm a consultant, and one of my requirements was that I have a permanent desk at my 'home' company, regardless of where I was onsite. Having a base of operations is crucial to
      the contentment of most employees. (and that includes both the special creative ones, and the rest of us poor lowlifes)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    10. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha what a typical whiner. She's puzzled that they won't let her use Windows in a Unix company!!! "I hated that personal decorations were frowned upon" "I hated the formulaic offices" LOL. Maybe you should look for work in the interior decorating field.

      The simple truth is: Women and computers don't mix! All the Social Engineering and Affirmative Action won't change that. Genetically men and women are different.

    11. Re:I worked in that office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As one of the other people who posted a follow-up pointed out, Windows is a real roach motel. You have made a decision to not learn how to use the proprietary tools well enough to be productive with them. As a result, you are stuck using Windows or a Mac to do productive work. People who can be productive with libre software tools and not tied down to any particular OS environment.

      Some people would rather concentrate on being productive than play musical operating systems.

      That came out a little more sarcastic than I intended, but it's basically true.

    12. Re:I worked in that office... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2
      "Oh, poor sensitive creative person! The world is so much more difficult for you!"

      Tell me about it...

      I'm talking about the people with their offices/cubicles decorated with every imaginable sticker and toy -- the ones who treat their office as a second home.
      Ok, sorry to be plain rude, but - these are the people that annoy me the most. "Oh look at my layers of crappy kitsch on my desk, I'm so cool - I brought a cot in so I can crash overnight because I'm so passionate about whatever the fuck lame thing I do". I'm sorry, did that sound burnt out?
      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    13. Re:I worked in that office... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "Do you even know how much it takes to create a decent web page layout that looks cool"

      Don't hold your breath waiting for me to sympathize with you...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    14. Re:I worked in that office... by Kiwi · · Score: 1
      Some people would rather concentrate on being productive than play musical operating systems.

      Exactly. I want to be productive with whatever computer ends up in front of me without needing to change the OS it is running. I couldn't do that if I needed some Windows application to be productive and the computer in front of me was running MacOS X or Solaris.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    15. Re:I worked in that office... by pmz · · Score: 2

      I feel that it's hypocritical to hire a web developer who is used to using Photoshop, a nice solid text editor, and Dreamweaver, throw that developer in front of vi and the Gimp, and expect that web developer to be as productive as before.

      It really seems to be neither Sun's fault nor yours. Simply, you were not a good canidate to work at a hard-core UNIX company.

      I do some web development on Solaris, and vi and the GIMP are just fine for me. In UNIX, simplicity and pure functionality are key. Sure, my work appears spartan, but it works, it works well, and it works consistently. No fancy pictures, Flash animations, nor JavaScript make for a very useful website. Quite honestly, I believe JavaScript and Flash have contributed to very few good websites and many thousands of awful ones.

      ...the creative minds in your company will hate it.

      This is an unneccessary generalization. For some people, UNIX is a haven for creativity, and the elegant simplicity of SunRay/X-terminal configurations cab be very enjoyable.

    16. Re:I worked in that office... by raptor21 · · Score: 1

      This looks like more of an issue with your manager and you, not Sun. Sun does ban certain applications and OSes but what you are claiming here isn't true. My friend who works for Iplanet uses his windows box more than his solaris box. I work for sun too and my group or manager doesn't have any such rules.

      No one forces any one to use vi at sun, you can always use anything you want. I have gedit, kate, emacs, gvim.... and a few text editors installed and use any of them I wish. all of the above are comparable to if not better than most windows based text editors.

      A creative person can be creative with anything. You sound like the proverb "A bad workman always complains about his tools".

      I work for Sun and have my own office( no cubicle) and my own workstation because my job requires it.I work on Solaris drivers and cannot be displaced from my lab. I am not pressured to not use a laptop or a mac(my group owns a windows laptop, I would never use it for work just for testing new devices by choice not pressure). I was encouraged to try out linux on SPARC and many opensource tools to evaluate them.

      SlashChick's coments do not reflect Sun's work culture. She seems like a person who gets into a comfort zone and won't adapt to new surroundings.
      If a developer understands the language he/she codes in, a piece of paper and a pen is all it takes to be creative. Creative minds don't leave because they don't have the tools they are used to, they improvise.

    17. Re:I worked in that office... by cureless · · Score: 1

      Then again, she isn't a developer...

      You meant a web site developer, right?
      I'm sure code developers where happy with vim/emacs/code warrior/make, etc. I don't think they needed too much Visual Studio or whatever the equivalent for Macs is.
      I wouldn't like to be stuck developing code in windows, specially code for SUNs. For web developing I guess Macs are OK.

      cl

      --
      Reply . . . let's get it over with.
    18. Re:I worked in that office... by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, did that sound burnt out?

      Yes, it did. :-)

      While I have no stickers or toys, I do have four plants, a fountain, and a small sound system. (one workstation and three digital flat panels) I find it helps me not hate being in a corporate office so much.

      I find that I am least happy when it's just me, some steelcase furniture, and a couple of machines. In these situations I burn out.

    19. Re:I worked in that office... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2

      Web development no longer means exclusively writing code. You're going to get a lot better results sticking a designer in front of Dreamweaver than you will sticking a unix-head in front of vi and gimp. And in probably a quarter of the time. The way web development is often done these days is the designers design the page in Dreamweaver and the code-monkeys write the CGI/PHP/ASP in over blocks of code. The days of writing web pages exclusively by hand are pretty much over. HTML isn't really "code" anyway, it's a markup language (and a very limited one at that.) It has more in common with PDF or PostScript than anything else. I think the original poster's problem was that she was recieving the same attitude from Sun as from you.

      The "creative types" at tech companies usually have a high turnover rate because they don't mesh with the rest of the company. This seems to me to come from a difference in the idea of what a computer is. To a "creative" person, a computer is just a tool, but it has to be the RIGHT tool. For example, you can't really expect a sculptor to do well if you give him a can of paint. Geeks or tech people tend to be more willing to accept changes like that. Neither way is more "right," certain people just work certain ways.

    20. Re:I worked in that office... by thona · · Score: 0

      And HERE you err. As a Web Developer is is NOT your choice alone whether javascript or flaash animations go onto a website. It is simply NOT YOUR CHOICE. We made a website for a customer lately that needed and wanted an animated demonstration on his website. Flash was the primary choice. From a Web DESIGNER it is expected that he is able to work around with efficiency. And with all the tools that might come up. He has his preferences, and in this case they should be honoured (i.e. once it is a GIF, you dont see the origin anymore). Anyhow, all professional tools are only available for Windows (hint, adobe). Sure he got pissed.

    21. Re:I worked in that office... by pmz · · Score: 1

      As a Web Developer is is NOT your choice alone whether javascript or flaash animations go onto a website.

      Choice is a right that I will never not have.

      We made a website for a customer lately that needed and wanted an animated demonstration on his website.

      This is an example where Flash is justified. On-line computer-based training is another good application for Flash. These applications are very specific and have a well-targeted audience, who probably won't mind installing the Flash browser plugin.

      However, nearly all current uses of Flash and JavaScript are simply unneccessary. They tend to break websites more than they help, and they are best avoided if at all possible.

  110. Cat got my tongue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In prison the rotate you regularly from cell to cell
    to keep you disorientated !!
    This sounds faintly familiar

  111. An employee's perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm employed by Sun, however I don't work in one of these "FFO's" (Flexible Field Offices). It's really not as bad as everyone here who doesn't work in one have made it out to be. It's not like this in every office, mostly smaller offices with 15-30 employees. In larger campus' people have cubicles and offices as well as the rooms with Sun Rays. The Sun Rays and these FFO's are field offices where the employee's are often out in the field. Why have 10 different workstations (one for each employee) when it's rare that all 10 employees are in the office at the same time? It doesn't make sense. Employees in the FFO's have a rolling (and locking) file cabinet for their files, etc. True, you don't get to hang pictures up and have your toys laying around your desk, but if you're not in the office much, it's not that big of a deal. The FFO's are a good idea that will save the company money.

  112. Been there, Done that (10 years ago) by darkonc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sun isn't so much discovering the dumb terminal, as re-descovering it.

    Portable offices have been a reality in the Unix world for more than a decade.

    When I worked at the University of British Columbia in 1991, we had it down pretty pat -- and this was in a hetrogenous (but almost entirely Unix) environment. We had Suns, SGIs, IBM RS/6000s, NeXts and a good smattering of other random UNIX varients. Everybody was served by a network of NFS and NIS servers, and you could log in anywhere you want to do your work..

    Not all of this was dumb terminals, though. People with light CPU loads would have X terminals and people with heavy CPU (or better funding!) would use a real workstation. Because home directories (and most binaries) were NFS mounted, I could log into any machine in our department (split over 2 buildings and 1/2 a mile) and do my work.

    For part of my time, my desktop terminal was a 5-year old Sun-3 set to boot dataless, later on I was assigned a low-end SGI. Now, granted, the SGI did a far better job as a flight simulator, but for most of my work, the Sun-3 was quite satisfactory. For any of my heavy work I could log into one of the heavy-duty compute monsters (Either physically or remotely depending on the type of work needed) and work there.

    word to the wise: in any remote-computing environment, always double check which machine your terminal is connected to before you do things like rebooting the system or formatting a filesystem.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  113. Another "Snow Crash" flashback by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does this remind anyone of the US Govt office environment from "Snow Crash"?

    1. Re:Another "Snow Crash" flashback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah, it's been mentioned here 7 times already. You're not original, funny, interesting, informative or insightful - Please Try Again Later.

  114. primarily phone vs. primarily keyboard people by geekotourist · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I hope that Sun tries out an experiment in potential productivity loss before implementing this:
    1. Take a group of engineers / analysts / documentation people
    2. find some measure of productivity and satisfaction for that group.
    3. Then mix them in with sales / support people, where random loud phone calls and talking interruptions are the rule
    4. see what this does to the first groups' productivity...

    I'd bet heavily that productivity (i.e. ability to find bugs, model a market, write a well crafted paragraph) goes down. Not hideously down, just enough to make great programmers merely good, and good programmers seek other employment.

    Mixing phone people with keyboard people isn't nice. It makes the phone people feel guilty and rude, if they know the programmers, etc. are trying to meet deadlines. (And people who listen to their 19 voicemail messages by speakerphone: Dante has a 6th circle reservation just for you. It involves Muzak and a pair of 20 billion watt speakers, so Don't Do It. Thanks.) It makes the programmers jumpy- you never know when a beautiful train of thought and logic gets derailed on the "RING, RING...Hi! Glad you got Back to me on those trade show booth color quotes! Teal? Lets talk Blue!Blue Blue Blah Blah..." the next cubicle over. I've been in this situation, and it hurts.

    And it ignores that paper is still a useful office object- crisp clear text that can be stared at for more than 1/2 hour without your eyes going numb, easy to spread out and cover with sticky notes...but no, you'll have to clean it up and put it away each night, regardless of sudden deadlines.

    I'll bet even more heavily that they did only a Benefit estimate, not a Cost-Benefit estimate, when they came up with that $150 million figure. I doubt they'll study it at all.

    Well, as Neal so aptly wrote (but darnitall he was making fun of them at the time, it wasn't supposed to be emulated):

    " So Y.T.'s mom has clacked up the stairs in her black pumps and gone into her office, actually a large room with computer workstations placed across it in a grid... So no more partitions. Just workstations and chairs. Not even any desktops. Desktops encourage the use of paper, which is archaic and reflects inadequate team spirit. What is so special about your work that you have to write it down on a piece of paper that only you get to see? That you have to lock it away inside a desk? When you're working for [Future Sun]... You do your work on the computer. The computer keeps a copy of everything, so that if you get sick or something, it's all there where your co-workers and supervisors can get access to it... And there's the question of interchangeability. [Future Sun] workers, like military people, are intended to be interchangeable parts. What happens if your workstation should break down? You're going to sit there and twiddle your thumbs until it gets fixed? No siree, you're going to move to a spare workstation... you don't have that flexibility if you've got half a ton of personal stuff cached inside of a desk, strewn around a desktop..." (Snow Crash, 93 paperback, pg 281)
  115. This sounds overengineered/under-designed to me by puppetluva · · Score: 2

    Why not just use cell-phones and wireless-enabled laptops? That way you don't spread keyboard germs and if there is a wireless link (properly authenticated) at home, you could work/phone there too without any loss of productivity or change in work environment.

    If the issue is centralized management, you could just have a hard-drive duplicator with everyone using the same image (with their home directory mounted from a server based on username/password).

    Are the dumb terminals (+ mongo servers + superfast networks) that much cheaper? What happens when people have special needs like Kinesis keyboards, tablets, or speakers? What happens when a server goes down? Is everyone hosed? What happens when the network is down?

    I think I must be missing something.

    1. Re:This sounds overengineered/under-designed to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why not just use cell-phones and wireless-enabled laptops? ... I think I must be missing something."

      Yeah. What you're missing is that Sun thinks both Apple and Microsoft are evil. Since only one company (not Sun) makes Solaris laptops, and those Solaris laptops are $8,000, Sun won't buy them. Instead they force all of their employees to use CDE-based workstations (gag).

      My favorite quote regarding this was on a Sun internal website where they mentioned why they were still grudgingly letting employees use Windows: "Until the marketplace catches up with Sun's leadership, [we will let people use Windows.]" Riiiiiight.

      Sun severely needs a reality check. Zander was Sun's last hope for a sane PC policy, too. Now that he is gone, Sun is screwed...

    2. Re:This sounds overengineered/under-designed to me by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      CDE is possibly the most evil desktop enviroment I've ever used...and probably why I compiled KDE3 instead, once I figured out how to add KDE3 to dtlogin's menu that is (damned if I could actually find any docs on that on docs.sun.com).

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  116. what I will really hate.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    changing my damn chair settings every time I move to a new office, that alone will piss me off as soon as I get to work. Not to mention, there might be fingerprints all over the screen, crumbs, sticky fingers, "funny" engineering smells (you know who I'm talking about, the dude(tte) that walks in and brings in a bucket of cold onion rings to eat), and of course the hot sales ladies' panties after a good night fscking by Larry Ellison...

  117. What about Coders? by EQ · · Score: 2

    Every coder I've ever known keeps a collection of vital dead-tree books at hand. And its usually a couple of shelves worth - not something you could cram into a locker or lug to your desk every day. What about whiteboards too?

    These are common things for coders. I see no allowance for them in this system.

    And it helps to have paper (filing cabinet) as well, things like notes from meetings, or desktop sketches where you are brainstorming. I use my Palm-Vx for some of that, or a PC drawing program, but, except for a whiteboard, nothing compares to 8x10 grid paper and a sharp Staedler Mars mechanical pencil for brainstorming with several other people.

    I do not see how this one would work for coders at all.

    --
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
    1. Re:What about Coders? by ag3n7 · · Score: 1

      http://safari.oreilly.com? Searchable Animal books and more... keeps me from lugging around 10-15 books from work to home again....

  118. Sadly, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you have no clue as to how businesses 'do business' these days.

    Perhaps you describe a government field office from the '60s, but you are otherwise off the mark in your examples and conclusions.

    Go to work in the bay area for a tech company and then check back, please.

  119. c/mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..this is the same company that wouldn't use chairs for meetings or allow anyone but FedX to deliver to them...hardly a good example of anything but wacky.

  120. Re:I worked in that office...But at Microsoft by blastedtokyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting philosophy at work here. Not surprisingly, microsoft's quite the opposite. Along with your own office, they have windows terminals (i.e. old crusty machines that are now only good as dumb terminals) in all the building lobbies and in several computer labs so you can terminal server to the machines in your office or to a central server that just has Office+IE. So you can work remotely or in your own office...funny how they give employees the much coveted _choice_ while sun doesn't.

  121. Ahem by Nailer · · Score: 2

    Only in the Windows world do you really really need a workstation of your own

    Windows NT 4 Terminal server has been around for quite a while, and Citrix's Winframe /Metaframe products before that. Get out more before spreading FUD.

  122. Very similar to VNC by spinozaq · · Score: 1

    I recently did a project involving the Sunray Appliance. The college I recently graduated from uses them almost exclusively for the CS labs. We have a large 8 way V880 sun server that runs all the Sunrays. Administration is very simple, this is important because the school won't hire anyone to do it, so the professors need to spend as little time as possible bothering with it.

    The sunrays can best be explained as a cat 5 connected video card. All the work is done with UDP packets, lots of them. There are commands to fill an area with a color, set an area with a specific bitmap or pixmap, and to copy a certain area to another location on the screen. The protocol is called SLIM and will be opened soon as all Sun protocols usually are. If this sounds like VNC designed for a high bandwidth low latency network, it's because it is.

    You don't need the smart cards to log in to the things. We have them set up with a normal dt login. The cards are fun though. And any "java smart card" can be used... Providian VISA anyone!

  123. Cliques get things done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many people work independently ? In my technical support group you need the chatter from your co-workers to know what is going on in the company. Did a server just crash ? Is a critical file full ? When you are surrounded by nameless and faceless workers that don't know/don't care what you do then your department's productivity will tank.

  124. Like "The Barbie Murders" (John Varley) by texchanchan · · Score: 2

    Sounds like John Varley's "The Barbie Murders" in which a cult, all modified to look identical, wearing standard coveralls, and supposedly taking whichever cell was empty for the night, had renegades who secretly grabbed the same cell every time and kept exotic costumes in it for private parties.

    Every office has secret stashes of one kind or another ("I know where there's plenty of Red Label Liquid Paper!"). Unless the building itself reconfigures every night they'll develop even under this plan.

  125. Re:Maturity? / MBWA by texchanchan · · Score: 2

    Sounds like there'd be MORE walking around-- Looking for your team members.

  126. Sun discovers dumb terminals? by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    Sun have been pushing diskless and dataless clients for as long as I can remember.

    Wouldn't it be hypocritical for them *not* to use them?

  127. A day in the life... by MrWHO · · Score: 2

    ..of an Italian Sun employee.

    When we started going down the flexible office path here in Italy people were not really happy about it. Expecially in Rome, where I work.

    I must first of all admit that this kind of solution would not work for people that spend every single day of their worklife at the office or people that need, for the kind work they do, a well specified place to sit and think. On the other hand to most of these people flexible office simply doesn't apply.

    I'm a project engineer. As such I spend most of my days sitting at the clients' site, or having meetings with colleagues to organise and plan our work, sometimes I do test installations in our labs, but at times I end up at the office. More often than not I go to the office simply to keep in touch with colleagues and to feel what's going on, other times to print documentation to be given to clients.

    All that I need to work it's there. I read about people that were worried about their manuals, and I really don't see the problem. My own manuals are on the public shelf we have, and it's even better than having my own shelf, since I can lookup also books that other people have brought in. It may be some thing about us down here in Southern Europe, but I don't think anyone has had a problem about it so far.

    When I arrive at the office I simply pick an empty spot near colleagues from my same team, plug in my laptop (yes, I do have a laptop, as all the people working on the field most of the time), put the smartcard in the SRay and at this point I have two workstations at hand!

    But, "Oh My God!!", some of my colleagues was on this very same seat before me, and used this mouse and keyboard. He could have had a deadly virus, or a cold!!

    Mmm. Let me think: I shake hand, hug, pat on the shoulders plenty of people everyday. I use often public transportation to move around, and damn: the ones I hang on are very dirty railings. And I'm doing still quite fine.

    I don't know about the people who showed these sort of concerns, but I use to wash my hands before eating. And I wash my hands when I get home. Sometimes I even wash my hands _before_ I go to the toilet. See, I've always seen personal hygiene just like that: personal. I really don't rely much on others when it comes to it.

    The point I'm trying to make is simple: I can't judge globally, but I have to admit that flexible office made my work better. I can't say it's the solution for anything, but it made my day better, because I can move near the people I'm working with at that point in time, and compared to a fixed office I can now choose in which office I want to go and work of the two we have here in Rome.

    Just my twopence,

    a smile,
    MrWHO

    --
    It is me, none else but me. And who would you be?
  128. Citrix anyone? by kenh · · Score: 1

    My company has just over 200 employees, and a great majority of them (nearly all except developers) run on Citrix...

    Dektops cost between $150 -> $450 (PII or greater is really sufficient), all files are stored on the servers, and I have the same desktop available on anyones desk in the company *or* remotely.

    Dial-up performance is spotty, based on who your ISP is, but Cable modem/DSL owners have an experience that is nearly the same as users in the office...

    Oh, and we can support all 200+ users with a 4 person IT group...

    Ken

    --
    Ken
  129. A policy for employees, a policy for executives by dazdaz · · Score: 1

    I find this corporate management personally insulting, when Scott McNeally et all Executive team don't abide by their own manegement policy's.

    Not only does this set a bad example, it displays the difference in mentality.Furthermore this platform approach is what pulls companies apart.

    What about a vote asking employees if they want this, and what they think about it? What about programmers with many heavy duty reference books on their desks? This decreases productivity but saves workspacing costs, what would you rather have? In the long term the productivity cost far outweigh the workspace costs.

    Sell your Sun shares, becuase their going to be worthless.

  130. PCChips is PCSHITS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are any of you stupid little shits old enough to remember the pcchips 486 boards with FAKE cache? What about the chipsets with misleading names like "TX-PRO" and logos like "Video Inside" on the heatsink made in the same style as the "Intel Inside" logo. Ugh. IMO, PC-Chips are shitty asian scam artists.

  131. the bully by oyenstikker · · Score: 2

    Nobody in your building has assigned desks. You go in and sit at the desk that Big Jim had been sitting in for the previous three weeks. Big Jim can't make you move. Big Jim finds you during lunch hour, beats you up, and takes your lunch money.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  132. Restroom tips by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    PHB obviously has not visited Germany, Belgium or the Netherlands often! Every toilet there (even in many McDonalds!) has a wizened old lady sitting by the cubicles collecting money.

    1. Re:Restroom tips by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* PHB obviously has not visited Germany, Belgium or the Netherlands often! Every toilet there (even in many McDonalds!) has a wizened old lady sitting by the cubicles collecting money. *)

      Hmmm. Shouldn't the lady pay the "visitors" for supplying fresh furtlizer?

  133. and you really want to disinfect by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    the mouse and keyboard before you start work each morning - bring a mousse spray can of anti-static anti-bacterial gloop with you.

  134. This is still true today by Susky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work in a fairly large company with thousands of Sun users. Generally speaking, homedirs and application are NFS mounted. And NIS lets any user log in anywhere inside the company as needed.

    Yeah, it lets users move around, but that's not the biggest reason we do things this way. People still have their own cubes, and their own desks. But if their machine dies -- like via a HD failure something -- they can just move over to a vacant machine and continue their work.

    Plus, establishing a standard OS load (jumpstart, in Sun terms), and building standard build scripts, we can make easy-to-swap machines for our users. Need a newer machine? Sure -- just log out, swap boxes, and log in. no muss, no fuss.

  135. Snowcrash by enigmatic+anomaly · · Score: 1

    Sun's officeless office place has a shocking reminder or the "Feds" from Neal Stephenson's Snowcrash. Where employees scramble each morning to get in early to get desk's at the 'front of the room' because it shows their commitment to work. Each employee's terminal, is monitored, even the amount of time spent reading a memo and the position of there eyes while reading is monitored all to generate information on the employee for there numerous personnel reviews, (which include polygraphs and the occasional truth drugs.)

    Not to say that Sun is going to these paranoid extremes, but the initial parallel was shocking.

    --
    Geoffrey Cameron Peart
    McMaster Software Engineering
    Monkies? I like Monkies
  136. That's why I don't like to by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    shake hands with programmers. Of course my preferred method of greeting people (kissing them on the cheeks) has its own obvious disadvantages here also! Maybe I should move to Japan and just bow a lot...

  137. We aren't quite that restrictive by Susky · · Score: 1

    Since I don't work for Sun, there's no pressure to maintain the image of "one OS is enough." We have a very mixed environment here. Most people use PCs with Windows, and many use Sun/Solaris boxes. Since the corporate types settled on Exchange/Outlook as the corporate mail system, they had to make that system available to all users.

    To get it all to work, the engineering community (the primary Sun users) access Citrix servers via the ICA client for Solaris. With that, they can do their Outlook thing, and also get to the whole MS Office suite. It seems to integrate nicely with all the other apps.

  138. There will be two primary views on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) the administrator view: Those who maintain equipment or users will love this. This means a lot less work for them. Managers will view this as positive for similar reasons. They will also feel that they can keep people together on a project basis more easily.

    2) the user view: People who actually use this will hate it. Having to rush to get a good desk; not being able to keep things on your desk; etc; It is actually un-empowering to not have your own real-estate at work. Not having your own machine is just as bad.

    There may be other views, but I feel that these are going to be the primary ones.

  139. Single Point of failure by NETHED · · Score: 1

    Opps, the server is down....ummm, we lost everyone's week's work, we won't be able to restore it all from backups for 24 hours.
    Go home.

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Single Point of failure by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Sun has already accounted for this, because you can set up multiple servers. When one goes down, it's responsibilities are served with another machine. This would rarely happen, because sun servers are rock solid. I have never had one crash on me!

      I don't know how many enterprise systems you have worked on, but most keep their data on a SAN or a dedicated fileserver with redundant controllers, and disks. The odds of losing data on modern storage arrays is near 0.

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  140. Interesting Pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read all the top-level threshold-1-or-higher comments. I noticed
    an interesting pattern. Most all of the people slamming this idea are those
    that misunderstand the equipment (i.e.: don't know what a SunRay really is)
    and those that have no experience with the implementation. Just about
    everybody that's had actual hands-on experience with the system seems to
    have mostly positive comments about it.

    I can tell you this: from a Systems & Network Admin. perspective, it seems
    to *me* that such a setup would incur far, far lower TCO than the typical
    "PC onna desktop" thing we see these days. I speak with *some*
    authority--having admin'd a nearly 100% server/X-terminal network in the
    past and now a server/pc-onna-desktop network now.

  141. Peopleware by spanky555 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like some folks at the top desperately need to read Peopleware. I thought hoteling was an idea whose time has come and gone...trying to treat knowledge workers like factory workers is really, really stupid. The idea that workers might be a company's biggest asset is a really threatening concept to some companies, apparently, and I think that some of this bizarre behavior is indicative of that.

    Also, just because it is easy to admin doesn't mean that it justifies this soulless environment.

  142. Still ain't cheap... by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    "...it probably is cheaper to run the business off a few large Sun server..."

    At Sun's prices, most companies can just buy cheap workstations from Dell or HPQ and still save money...

    1. Re:Still ain't cheap... by buysse · · Score: 2

      Not once you count administration -- a few servers and stateless boxes on the desk, or a few servers and stateful boxes on the desk. You choose which is cheaper. TCO, baby...

      --
      -30-
  143. Mostly used for consultants.... by jsimon12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is really for the most part used for consultants, sales and the like that travel a lot and really aren't in the office most of the time. Programmers, sys admins, admins and those that are in the office all the time still have real desks. And if you want to argue with me I work for Sun and I am a consultant and I had a desk the first year I was with the company and was in the office I think a total of 4 days. This kinda office enviunment makes sense if you understand the context it is used in.

  144. Not new. The Sun IPC did it years ago. by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    First with the IPC "diskless workstation", then with the standalone X server, Sun did this a long time ago. Just because it is news to YOU doesnt mean it is news.

  145. Wasn't this in a book a few years ago? by Proteus+Child · · Score: 1
    Didn't the FBI do this to its coders in Neal Stephenson's Snowcrash?

    Scary - life's starting to imitate sci-fi more and more.

    --

    Proteus' Child

    Doko ni datte; hito wa, tsunagette iru.

  146. Followup... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    This is just the successor to their previous "iDon'tWork" program.

    (sorry, it was too irresistable)

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  147. Re:"Hotelling" - hardly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup - you've heard "hotelling" because this practice has been going on in the corporate world for a while now although it seems to have begun to sweep the IT industry as yet another way of cost-cutting. If you are an employee who isn't always needed in the office, you are a very good candidate for hotelling. HP, for example, has been "hotelling" its regional support and sales people for several years now - in some cases actually selling their old office buildings and obtaining leases on smaller office space. Mind you, HP has been providing some support for such individuals to set up "home offices" (another trend ...) - is this the next step to contract employees?? If an when such companies start re-hiring, are the new hires going to expect an office?

  148. Dumb Terminals vs. Thin Clients... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    I just want to make sure you know the difference between dumb terminals and thin clients, because it sounds like some people think they're the same thing.
    A dumb terminal is a monitor that has a power cord and a serial cord, and a keyboard that plugs into the monitor. All the screen does is display what is sent down the serial cord from the master computer. Not even the keyboard text is displayed unless the master computer has echo on.
    A thin client is an actual computer that stores usually just the operating system, and maybe a couple basic apps, ie Call Tracking software, and uses the network for data storage/retrieval.
    Aside from that, I dont see how, in this world of windows, we're going to go back to dumb terminals, unless someone makes a win-on-chip terminal, which would be pretty sweet. The serial signals could be retrofitted over 8-pin network architecture, albeit with totally different routers. But goodbye, bootup times :-P But most likely, we're going to stick with thin clients, which are what are used in most call centers, be it progressive insurance or 1-800-EY-HELP3, Ernst and Young's helpdesk. Last I checked, EY used a program over windows called quintus to transact call mgmt over the network, and you could not install any software on the systems or you'd get canned (Not that this stopped anyone). Falls under the definition of a thin client. Progressive uses thin clients (again, using windows) to run a terminal emulator to connect to an AS-400. Thin client. The're everywere already, so this stuff isnt new :-P Sounds like sun is just finally catching up...

  149. at the university.. by thorgil · · Score: 1

    At the Swedish University of agr. sci.)
    We are also using this very nice system....

    When used with a NT-terminal server running citrix you can run m$ progs as well. (funny thing, M$ licence is payed per installed mashine -> 200 sunrays + citrix servers -> 4 university licences of msoffice or so.) As long as the NT-machines are powerful they can handle 20-30 word sessions or so...

    Biggest advantage with the surays are actually the workers environment. Sunrays produce very little heat and no sound at all (no fan, harddrives etc...).

    The internal speaker sux but with headphones or external speakers the sound is ok..

    Somewhat slow screen update times when running cruel stuff like full screen video or image manip. (even with 100Mbit FullD)

    They also (at least for us) come with a 5 year guarantee. (some of the sunrays have overheat problems and burn out).

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  150. I have been using Sun dumb terminals for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the big deal?

    This isn't a new concept, the SunRays have been around for a while and NCD/and others have had compatable.

    oi.. as much as I like Sun, this is just another example of something old being sold as new.

    RevHelix

    http://www.revynet.org

  151. Are you a Troll? by Accelerated+Joe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Adaptability does not equal creativity.

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
  152. inhuman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sun is trying to make us slaves to the computers.
    They are supposed to serve us, not us serve them.
    This is sick, disgusting, inhuman, degrading, and
    all around really bad. Where would I put the pictures of my children? If I did not have kids, I sure as hell would not be working, at least at a computer job.

  153. Snow Crash ROCKED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh.... I can just imagine some Sun employee coming in and trying to argue with a manager with his Reason

    (hehehehehe....)

    that book rocked.

  154. this annoys me also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it with people putting their fingers on the screen??? Haven't they learned yet that if you put your FINGER on the screen it will make a FINGERPRINT. Just supports my conclusion that most people are retarded sheep.

  155. Not all sunrays are used as floaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sunrays are used it two places.

    1. The drop in centers. This are places that anyone can use. Generally these are used by people that do not need an office all the time. IE. Sales people and field engineers. These people also have windows laptops and can use these on the road and connect via a vpn or they can jack them in at the drop in center.

    2. Regular Offices. People that use Solaris workstations are having them replaced with Sunrays. These people do not change offices. This method allows for less noise in the office, one system that always works and you can get to your email and other tools, and much less System Administration overhead. Patch one server and all 50 desktops are done. The kind of things allows one SA to administrate ~7 field offices. Developers will still have other systems to do testing on, but this keeps them from messing up thier own box that they use for non-development activites.

  156. jeee-ZUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I can think of a few reasons why you'd want to have a win32 or macOS machine available (mainly to test how different web browsers react to things), but it's very interesting to me that you contrast "solid text editor" with vi... Also, "highly creative person" and "applications that don't run on Solaris" is a logically interesting sentence... If you are, as you say, highly creative, then of what import is it to have tool A vs. tool B? If you're creative, you'll find ways to produce excellent work in any environment.

    Overall, your post sounds typical of the startup, "creative" "talent", bitchy, whiney prima donna attitude that seemed to so prevade the IT industry pre-dot-com-crash. Famous Singer: "I must have Melba toast exactly 12 minutes before I stage, or else I simply can't sing!" Web Developer, 1999: "I must have [XYZ crutchware applications] or I simply can't be expected to make a website." Just the *name* developer sends me recoiling now... In my mind, "developer" is somebody in real estate or something photos get immersed in... In the working-end of IT/webwork you're either a programmer, a sysnet admin, or a glorified copywriter/graphic artist... Any other title is pure ego stroking. Perhaps I'm overly sensitive to this, becuase I'm part of this industry and would normally be called a "web developer" or something equally retarded at most web/it shops.

    A final point, one which i think is SADLY and FREQUENTLY overlooked by tech people: you go to the office to FUCKING WORK. Not to put up cute crap and pictures of your kids or shoot nerf bullshit at your coworkers. Anything which is not directly related to WORK has no place in the office. Arguments about how having a koosh ball or nerf gun make you more productive are just silly. Family photos should only be allowed so the boss can have something to point at and say "work harder or they don't eat". The *sole* exception I can see to this no-personal-crap policy is music, and at that, buy some goddamned good headphones so you don't annoy your coworkers. I'd give my left arm to convert my entire office over to Unix, that might keep my shithead coworkers from playing Unreal Tournament at 3pm when I'm trying to, you know, do something of value to the goddamned company. I don't want any of the "soft" benefits people trumpet about the tech industry. Want to compensate me better for my rare(r) skills? Give me more fucking money. Anything else is just (management||employee) mentalwank.

    1. Re:jeee-ZUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have any mod points (alas). But you took the words right out of my mouth.

  157. suits are bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suits are bad. They just want hackers to shut up and work. If suits keep messing around with hackers, hackers will stop working for suits. Then suits will get lamers to work for them. Lamers are also bad. Hackers won't use lame Software. Suits will loose. Hackers will win. That is how it must be. That is how it will be.

  158. Thin Clients + Remote Access = Wrong by quakeroatz · · Score: 0

    My company implemented thin clients (120+ users, NT Terminal Server) and it failed miserably. The main problem is bandwidth.

    Sure a local dumb terminal setup with spry servers and Uberl33t LTSP or Solaris might offer usable performance over a highly tuned 100baseT switched network, but diconnect that cat5 and replace it with cable/DSL internet access and say goodbye to productivity.

    Can you imagine logging into work using DSL, using your brand new shiny Sun terminal box, then clicking a 10meg production report?

    In a LAN scenario this takes a completely tolerable 5 seconds, but over DSL? You're looking at 5 -10 minutes.

    Network terminals using anything below 100baseT is just plain wrong. I really can't see anything useful coming out this technology until we all have fiber in our homes .

    my 2c

  159. cde, windows and gnome by sad_ · · Score: 1

    as somebody else pointed out already, this whole setup is basicly remote X with CDE. they did a demo once at work, because management was looking at citrix/nt and sun's solution.
    well, the .pps presentation was all very nice, until they turned on the sunray and showed the 'famous' cde interface to our poor managers. that was pretty much the end for sun's solution right there.
    sure, I would had no problems with cde (although it is not my favorite x environment), but imagine all those other people in the company used to win95.
    'poor poor helpdesk', is about the only thing that came to all our minds.
    anyway, I think that is the reason SUN is putting so much effort in GNOME (usability report, code contribution, etc). gnome is not windows (some people may argue :P), but i think most people will be able to adept faster to gnome then to cde. (i'm talking normal people here, not us, the /.-reading crowd)

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  160. Correction... by cascadefx · · Score: 2
    I am sure that Sun will take offense at the term Dumb Terminal....

    Scott McNealy:

    That's Java Terminal to you... Bub, and don't you go forgetting it. You see, it has all the power and flexibility of Java. A dumb terminal doesn't have any of that.

    Oh, a n d the network is the computer a n d privacy is overrated.

    There. I think I am done.


  161. Ignore human factors at your peril by ajv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When an office is designed around making the office the primary focus, rather than the humans that occupy it, you have lost. It's not the office that generates revenue - it's the human workforce.

    To create shareholder value, you have to make the workforce productive, and nothing - and I mean nothing - makes a workforce more loyal, productive and ready to jump through hoops for you than happiness and belief in their own greatness. This office deliberately sets out to destroy human qualities by dehumanizing the workplace (ie, photos being frowned upon, etc).

    Offices such as this have no human response, and in fact, it's like a disgruntled or evil bean counter (ie a human Catbert) wanted to make the most offensive office they could.

    I'll tell you a story about why Sun will go broke in the next 10-20 years, and irrelevant in 2-5 years (just as SGI are irrelevant now*). About six years ago, Sun (and several other high end Unix vendors) responded to a multi-milion dollar tender. All the other vendors concentrated on unique features of their hardware (Digital on clustering and massive scalability, etc), software and service offerings. Sun concentrated on bashing Microsoft for 90% of their face time with us. Microsoft wasn't even in the potential set of competitors! And to top it off, Sun was the least competitive of all the bids - slowest hardware, and most expensive.

    Sun - you have to focus on making the humans happy. Whether they be your users, your customers, or your employees.

    --
    * I work in the security industry, and it's been three years since I've seen an SGI in production, and I've been to hundreds of clients all over Australia. I've seen an Aviion and a DG/UX box since the last time I saw an SGI, for example!

    --
    Andrew van der Stock
    1. Re:Ignore human factors at your peril by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I'll tell you a story about why Sun will go broke in the next 10-20 years, and irrelevant in 2-5 years [snip]

      You work in securities, and you base your analysis off a single bad salesdork? Now I know what goes into the average stock pick. "I liked the guy. Buy."

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    2. Re:Ignore human factors at your peril by Anthony · · Score: 1

      You work in securities, and you base your analysis off a single bad salesdork? Now I know what goes into the average stock pick. "I liked the guy. Buy."

      Huh? read his post again. Then figure out the difference between "security industry" and "securities industry".

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
    3. Re:Ignore human factors at your peril by ajv · · Score: 2

      Please re-read my post - I now work as a security consultant, not a day trader. When Sun did their bad thing, I was a senior system administrator and project worker, responsible for the IT needs of 1/3rd of my state's health infrastructure. We ended up going with Digital - nice boxes! Two 8 processor boxes in a two node cluster, 14 GB of memory each, robot tape library and ~ 500 GB of disk. Remember, this was back in 1997, so this was a kick ass solution then.

      Our tender was big enough that we had the Australian Sun head office (which is in another state) working overtime to make this presentation. They flew in sales people and techs from interstate and overseas. They were prepared to find us (and fly us) to reference sites in our geographical region (nearest was Singapore IIRC). We are not talking about a single sales person - we are talking about an endemic, consistent failure on behalf of Sun Microsystems to understand our business at all and who their *actual* competitors were.

      Andrew

      --
      Andrew van der Stock
  162. Flex office + hot young geek girl = by gotak · · Score: 1

    A flock of horny young engineers.

    Can you imagine that kind of situation?

    But hey at least with flex office if you stalk your geek girl you might just be able to get into the seat next to her. As oppose to being accross the office and making trips to the water cooler.

  163. Just like the movie "Brazil"... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Pretty scary.

  164. Points well taken, but... by aquarian · · Score: 2
    All your points are well taken, but...

    I feel that it's hypocritical to hire a web developer who is used to using Photoshop, a nice solid text editor, and Dreamweaver, throw that developer in front of vi and the Gimp, and expect that web developer to be as productive as before

    It's not hypocritical, it's stupid. They shouldn't have hired you in the first place... a point proven when you left anyway.

  165. I saw a demo of the SunRay by azadrozny · · Score: 1
    I saw a demo of this about 2 months ago. It was very cool. The demo had two terminals and two cards. You could move your card from one machine to the other and it would restore every thing as you had it at your previous location. It even memorized where I was in a RealPlayer video that was playing.

    I am not advocating the abolishment traditional offices, but this could be real nice for people who travel to other sites often. My company has visiting manager/employee offices in every building. It is an office, or cube that has a phone and a workstation. They are great to check email, or even use for a NetMeeting confrence. One problem is that they have a generic PC image on them. This usually include little more than the OS, Outlook and MS Office. This would be a great improvment. Imagine being able to carry your "workstation" in your wallet.

  166. Sad, sad, sadistic... by Codein · · Score: 1

    Once a corporation starts to think bodies replace productivity, creativity and loyalty then we have nothing but '1984'.

    America is a nation of creative thinkers which is why we are the largest economy in the world. We love to personalize everything we do. So I see this as the final staggering step in Sun's final death or demise since they don't know the deference _period_

  167. Mature Star Office by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    What i found most interesting about the article was this comment:

    "Sun also has its own word processing and office suite, called Star Office, which it has begun selling, instead of it giving away, in a sign of maturity for the Microsoft Office rival."

    For those who still doubt, this is why charging for Star Office is such a good idea (just so long as we still have OpenOffice.org for free that is).
    It is amazing that the journalist has this attitude that it is better purely because they are now charging for it, but it goes to show what you can expect from the Pointy Haired Bosses.

  168. On the phrase "Dumb Terminal:" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From esr's Jargon file:

    dumb terminal n.

    A terminal that is one step above a glass tty, having a minimally addressable cursor but no on-screen editing or other features normally supported by a smart terminal. Once upon a time, when glass ttys were common and addressable cursors were something special, what is now called a dumb terminal could pass for a smart terminal.

    http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/dum b- terminal.html

    ...I'm sure that whatever the thin client is in this story, it's not really a "dumb terminal."

  169. Are you a Fucking Retard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it does you dumb shit, that's why poor folks are usually more creative than rich folks. (Think I'm making this up? Compare the art of poor-as-dirt guatemalan natives to the art of rich suburbanite housewives... beautiful embroidered fabric vs... flower arraingement... yeah.)

  170. Re:LOL!!! Dilbert !!! by meldroc · · Score: 2

    I'm reading that exact strip, under the "Hoteling" section of The Dilbert Principle, in Chapter 2: Humiliation.

    The only drawback to the cubicle-oriented office is that some employees develop a sense of "home" in their little patch of real estate. Soon, pride of ownership sets in, then self-esteem, and poof--good-bye productivity.

    But thanks to the new concept of "hoteling," this risk can be eliminated. Hoteling is a system by which cubicles are assigned to the employees as they show up each day. Nobody gets a permanent work space, and therefore no unproductive homey feelings develop.

    Another advantage: Hoteling eliminates all physical evidence of the employee's association with the company. This takes the fuss out of downsizing; the employee doesn't even have to clean out a desk. With hoteling, every employee has "one foot out the door" at all times.

    Hoteling sends an important message to the employee: "Your employment is temporary. Keep your photos of your ugly family in the trunk of your car so we don't have to look at them."

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  171. I think you missed my point. by SlashChick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "While I do respect people who are able to be productive in a strict *NIX environment more than people who need to use something else to get their work done, I understand that Linux is not for everyone."

    Perhaps I would have gotten people more up in arms had I mentioned that Linux (any PC-based OS that required your own computer instead of a terminal) was frowned upon as much as Windows and Macintosh were. I said several times that I would work fine if they gave me a Macintosh instead (since the Windows 2000 computer I received from another part of Sun was evidently not adequate.) But my boss pointed out that other people (who were doing email support and not development) were fine with a Solaris box. He couldn't understand why I didn't want to give up my laptop for a CDE desktop and smart card, even though (here's the kicker) he too used a laptop on a daily basis.

    When you hire an employee, you are expected to give that employee a standard set of tools. In this case, Sun bought me a Windows 2000 laptop and a Solaris workstation (well, the workstation was a hand-me-down.) Then my boss tried to force me to give up the laptop in favor of being Solaris-only because of the "image" that using Windows gave Sun (trust me, they were doing this to the Mac people as well.) I said no, and I quit.

    When you don't give your employee the tools that that employee needs, and try to force their hand in using other tools that aren't designed for the job, then you have a bad match as the employer/employee relationship goes. What bothered me most was that they weren't trying to proclaim that Solaris was more productive or had better tools than Windows or a Mac, but that Sun's "image" would look bad if Sun's web developers used anything but SunRays. I can understand this attitude from a high corporate level, but can anyone seriously (with a straight face) tell me that you have the same applications available to you on Solaris as on Windows? (I'm not even sure if the GIMP was available on their servers.) It's a terrible mentality to push the "eat your own dogfood" attitude so far that your employees quit. I know I wasn't the only employee to leave over something like this, either.

    I think Sun needs to rethink its position regarding the tools that its employees use. Sure, give everyone a SunRay. But don't shove Solaris down people's throats as the One True Way. Understand that there are a lot of things that simply don't run on it, and understand that your (Sun's) customers aren't going to want to run a 100% Solaris shop, either. Sun will fail in the marketplace if they believe that Solaris will fill every business niche that Windows fills now, and that is exactly the attitude I see from inside Sun.

  172. X terminals work for small companies too by Qef · · Score: 1

    We converted to using a single Linux server a year or so back, with X terminals (very cheap PCs running nothing but X). It saves massive amounts of time, since nobody is willing to dick with the server for fear of messing it up for everyone else. We used to have to spend a lot of time fiddling with individual PCs, which of course could each be configured differently.

    The MD wrote a tutorial about how we set these X terminals up.

  173. VNC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can be done using VNC too. I use a Windows box as the display (company orders :-), but have my X-server running on a linux box. I can go to any Windows box (or linux box) and run the VNC client software and connect to my X session.

    -jeff

  174. Sure, people will arrive early... by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1
    ...but will they stay late? In a nice, comfortable office with all the comforts of home, sure, but in a cold, unpleasant McCube, no way.

    If you want your employees to spend long hours getting your product out the door, you need to provide an environment that they'll want to spend long hours in....

  175. Score another for Neal Stephenson! by sleight · · Score: 2

    That's right out of Snow Crash! The Fed (US Government) workforce functioned in exactly the same way. Early arrivals would sit close to the door of the office and latecomers would be forced to sit further away making them the obvious object of spurn and ridicule.

    Frightening stuff.

  176. Don't be an idiot by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    teams work better together.

    Body language & gestures don't work well in emails.

    Plus someone getting up & explaining something on a white board for some reason actually works better that a white board networked work station program

  177. bullshit by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Have you seen what those office specialist places charge that corporates & govt depts have accounts with?

    It much cheaper just to give employees petty cash & send them to the local bargain basement shop in the mall & tell them to buy what they want & bring back a receipt.

    1. Re:bullshit by anothy · · Score: 2

      //Have you seen what those... places charge...

      yup. makes you think you're in the wrong line of work, huh? "yeah, uh, you want desks. definatly gonna need desks. grey ones. oo, and round the edges. definatly. that'll be $5K, pleasethankyou."

      you're possibly right, maybe given that as the alternative, a personal budget would be more cost-effective.
      but maybe not. still keep in mind that doing it per-person means that becomes a recurring cost, rather than a more-or-less one-time cost. and, as i said, the per-person budget adds moving and/or storage expenses.
      also, and perhaps more importantly, it's quite possible to simply not employ one of those stupid office specialist firms. when we laid out our first lab, we simply told an in-house HR person what we wanted, and he poked around in the basement and found stuff for us. much cheaper for the company, and we got good stuff (since he'd gotten input from us and was pretty sharp himself). the second time, we went down and roamed around the surplus area in the basement ourselves. not quite as cost effective for the company (the four of us combined, thankfully, got paid more than that one HR person), but still way better than the office specialist route, and much better than ther per-person shopping budget, and we got nearly exactly what we're looking for.
      now, that wouldn't work in smaller companies (since they're not likely to have a useful surplus of furniture lying around), but the first model's still reasonable.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  178. Flattery will get you nowhere by Accelerated+Joe · · Score: 2

    You might want to start taking that medication again, Buddy. A spell checker wouldn't hurt, either.

    I take it as a compliment that you can't verbalize an opinion without name calling. However, at that point, you've already lost. You didn't even argue on topic. Thanks.

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
  179. Re:Real brilliant. (It is at least a step in the r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an example without going to the literature: have you ever been in school in a class where seats were not assigned? Did people typically claim ownership of seats anyway?

    I can give you one better than that. I was an astronomy major in college. We had the majority of our classes in one room. Not only would we all sit in the same seats every day in each class, we would usually sit in the same seats in every class we took in that room. Sometimes, on the first day of class, someone would get there earlier and "steal" someone else's seat, but even in that case people didn't usually move more than one or two seats in any direction. In almost every case like that, the person kept the new seat for the whole semester, even if they did sometimes get there earlier than the person who had stolen their seat. But the next semester when they had a course in that room, they would usually move back to their old seat if they could. In fact, moving to a different seat voluntarily was so rare that the professor would often comment if someone did, or at least look at them kind of funny (the classes were small, so it was obvious when someone wasn't in their usual place).

  180. You ain't whistling Dixie by bcaulf · · Score: 1

    People who put their fingers on screens need to be forcefully reeducated. People who don't know how to clean a mouse need the same treatment, although optical mice many render this skill obsolete.

  181. True Justice by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 2

    And people who listen to their 19 voicemail messages by speakerphone: Dante has a 6th circle reservation just for you. It involves Muzak and a pair of 20 billion watt headphones , so Don't Do It. Thanks.

  182. If nobody has their "own" machine... by rick-o · · Score: 1

    where do they keep all their mp3s?

  183. wine sessions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you run wine sessions on a sun thin client?

    sure...... maybe you forgot that wine only
    emulates the operating system, not the chip
    architecture?

    next time try not to just make crap up.

  184. Re:Don't be an idiot (2) by Bat_Masterson · · Score: 1

    There are a ton of free software projects on the Internet that have been developed by people all over the world who never met each other face to face. Imagine how much stuff they'd put out if it was their job as well as their hobby.

  185. Re:I worked in that office...But at Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS's terminals aren't nice. They don't save personal settings. So every time I log into a windows 2000 server, I'd have to close all the spyware(gator.exe, etc.), uninstall it, and manually remove any program that the uninstaller didn't delete. Then I'd have to install Mozilla (because I want full character entity & Unicode support, which IE doesn't offer). This takes quite some time. On the other hand, Sun Ray machines, which I also have tried, seems to save these kind of settings. nice, imho.

  186. This is nothing new. Sun's being doing for 2 years by blakeh · · Score: 1

    I worked at Sun in a Sales office over two years ago and they started just after I left. And as stated in another reply above this it's not being done in the Engineering groups (for example) last I heard. Only the areas where the office is fairly transient.

    Very OLD OLD news - there is better stuff out there than this

  187. Re:Real brilliant - but not every time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sounds like you had good management, or at least a set of "pointy-haired bosses" that didn't think this was just about saving money. Having a "team room" concept for a self-directed technical team was something I always thought was a great idea; you have just let me know that if the conditions can be created, it can be done to the team's benefit.

    OTOH, at the place I worked - as an employee of the services arm for "the-Cult-of-the-soon-to-be-dead-Alpha" (AKA Digital Equipment) - as money got tighter, they just decreased the amount of space per employee. Initially, the "hoteling" was a ratio of 3 people per seat; by the time I left, it was 5 per. Even getting there early didn't help when there was only one spot for every 5 people (of those of us who didn't deserve real desks).

    I just find it amazing that some organizations still do not look at more than physical factors when doing the math. We are still subject to many legacies of the last 500 years of evolving work environments (and many thousands of years of social evolution before that). Territory is important, for many reasons, as is personalization. (If it wasn't, why did someone create the concept of big versus small cubes in the first place? And what about pinboards on cube walls?)

    The key message in this post above mine is they decided as a team what to do. Having someone decide for you how you work and where is quite a different story. I would want to ask the SUN users of this concept how well it works for them. Hey, I can work anywhere - even create presentations in airport lounges waiting on planes - but is that the best way for me to work? I think not!

    Even on Star Trek, Star Wars, Farscape, and etc. (our "future" as we see ourselves) people have their designated stations, rooms, patterns. One of the most ironic situations in a new Enterprise show occured in "Fallen Hero", when T'Pol striped all personality from Hoshi's room in preparation for Ambassador V'Lar. The Ambassador seems to have some fun with this, knowing full well that no human would have a room so spartan. In thinking back to how that room looked when T'Pol was done, to me it is just like a "hoteling" desktop; no traces of your personality can be left in place, in order not to possibly offend the next occupant.

    Not every design fad makes sense for everyone. I sometimes wonder if any of the managers that make the decisions to experiment with employees at their expense ever heard their mom say "... and if everyone else was jumping off a cliff, would you jump off a cliff too?" Let's hope someone comes up with a new office paradigm soon, or their won't even be chairs left nextime.

    --AC-- (comfortably seated in my nice chair from Herman Miller / at least for now ...)

  188. Re!--:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm!--mmmm

  189. Re:Don't be an idiot (2) by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes but most of the major projects like GNome and KDE have regular conf to hash out yearly plans which most of the big players attend.

  190. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  191. A different perspective by polikitti · · Score: 1

    Apart from the obvious cost-savings and giving the employees better freedom, this initiative also has a lot of other important perspectives.

    As a management student, one major challenge faced is the compromise on flexibility during growth. Typically in a startup, the advantages of flexibility, informal communication, etc., are tremendous. But growth often brings in heirarchy, structure and rigidness into an organisation. To have growth and retain the freshness of a startup has been till today very difficult. This is a move towards that. I've seen some videos of this being implemented in a design office in France. There
    the guys come with a laptop and they have a movable trolley/table which they move to an indeterminate work-place. this way they have better cross-department informal communication channels. This way they do not have any binding with heirarchy or structure. It'll make the organisation a lot more flexible.

    Another concept is that of focus, as an organisation, Sun should concentrate on building more computers and not on building campuses and
    providing good workplaces. - a step towards it.

    Most importantly, this goes hand-in-glove with sun's concept of "Network is the computer". there's no point in selling a concept to your customers, if you yourself don't believe in it. This has been practised in Sun for quite long, I believe all fixes go on a huge server that runs a lot of home directories, intranet servers etc., and that gives confidence to ship it to customers.

    --
    I am an atheist, thank God!
  192. I worked in that office too... by untulis · · Score: 1

    I've also worked in that office (Folsom and New Montgomery for the curious), though only for a week back in April as a contractor for a consulting company helping with Sun's web presence as well.

    Part of that office is "hotelling", part of it is permanent space, some of it two person offices, some of it more open plan space. In this part of the building, things were business as usual... one of the web team had quite an array of office decorations and a bunch of machines, Slowlaris, Macs and PCs. Apparently the lack of office decorations and not letting people use their own tools didn't apply to him.

    It was definitely mostly empty, except one day when there was a press event in the building, in which case there were a bunch of marketing flacks who parked there. (One slept, one yakked on the phone all afternoon setting up meetings, but not actually doing anything, one got seriously miffed that we had been in those spots for two days, but she was apparently able to book the spots, despite another one being right across the way.)

    One of the silly things was the networking setups. Each four port had one phone jack, one port for the SunRay, one 10BaseT jack and one other port I never found out what it was for. We all had Winblows craptops, so we used the 10BaseT ports. But we wanted to all camp in one conference room to allow us to minimize our impact on the office as well as making it easier to collaborate. Except there were only three ports in that conference room and more than three of us. When we brought in a hub, the network ports shut down! We were told it was because it was using "too much bandwidth". A bunch of crap. So we had to spread out and squat in some of the hotelling space. We tried to reserve our spots, but it didn't take (see miffed woman above).

    So long and short, interesting concept, works for some folks, doesn't work for other folks, not quite sure why she had the problems she did given what I saw in the permanent space.

    1. Re:I worked in that office too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe... you were from Niteo, right? I was the girl who helped you figure out what was wrong with the network ports and submit a Servicedesk request about it.

      My boss tried to force me to give up the laptop and the office about two or three weeks after you left, which was when I left.

      --SlashChick (Erica)

  193. Ke-rist! by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

    Man, I'd go nuts if I had to put up with that. And probably take out a few people with me.

    I'm back at school at the moment, but at my last job, I had a very particular set of requirements. They were absolutely necessary for me to work efficiently, and for me to be sufficiently happy with my job that I wouldn't just up and leave.

    For example, I had to have a Mac, and it had to have the OS set up how I like it. The apps I like (e.g. Illustrator instead of Freehand, which is the vector program of the Devil), the preferences I like, and the file structure I like. I had to have a big ass CRT, and because I was a graphics person, I had to do a fair bit of work to ensure that everything was perfectly calibrated. (9300K sucks ass) I had to have the kind of keyboard that I like, despite the fact that they haven't been manufactured in years. (though it wasn't much trouble finding one) My headphones are too big to carry around with me ordinarily, so they needed to be left there, along with the extension cord for them.

    The desk had to be extremely deep, very large overall, and have no middle drawer because of the way that I like to sit at it. The chair had to be precisely adjusted, and I needed to control the lighting for my comfort and to preserve the color calibration. This means no florescent lights, and no direct sunlight in my field of vision or where it interferes with the screen.

    I had piles of notepads and sticky notes, which I needed to keep ideas handy. Not to mention several reference cards I made, laminated, and fixed to the desk surface for convenience. I needed to have certain reference books handy, since looking things up online would've been slower (I heavily tab and highlight my books, and I write and draw in the margins various useful things) and would waste valuable screen space that could be used to look at whatever it is that has me resorting to a reference book.

    Fortunately I never had a phone at my desk -- I don't believe in them and don't like to use them.

    And with all this, I was at my best. In a generic environment, where I am inevitably uncomfortable, because I haven't changed things to suit me (something humans tend to do, you know), I'd spend more time either trying to get things set up right, or slow because of conflicts with the surroundings (imagine getting direct sunlight on the screen for half a day!).

    OTOH, I very much enjoyed having an open floor plan, since I could conveniently talk to my co workers, and them to me, as well as move about. When cubicals started to come in, I managed to stay out of them, and have an open desk.

    This isn't to say that there aren't one or two good things about this. I'd like to be able to access my stuff as though I was sitting at my computer from another desk. But it wouldn't be my computer, or my desk, so it's not as though I'd ever make a habit of it.

    I can definately imagine if I were ever stuck with something like this, having to establish someplace as my area, and perhaps having to wheel around a shopping cart to keep my stuff.

    Given that business relies on human beings infinitely more than technology, I can't see that this is a good idea at all.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  194. Re:I worked in that office...But at Microsoft by cooldev · · Score: 2

    AC - you're missing the point. You can log onto your desktop via. Terminal Server and get your exact desktop, with all of the applications that you left running. It's pretty much the same as the description of the SunRay, except that you're remoting off of your own machine, not a central server.

    Also, people in core product groups usually have 2-4+ machines 2+ monitors in their office, so when you need to collaborate it's a mini lab. Someone else can just drop by and log in using a spare machine to reference source code or whatever else they need.

    (Is this new? No, X has been doing it for years. But it's still cool.)

  195. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are just now discovering this?

    I worked for Sun Microsystems on a contract period for the majority of 2001 and part of 2000 - their offices (at least, the one in Alpharetta, GA - Boston I never got a good look at) are all hotel-based. You've got a Sun Ray 1000 sitting in the office, to which a 21" monitor and keyboard/mouse is connected. You also have a smart card. You insert the smart card into the thin client and it logs you in with all your desktop prefs. (Alternatively, you can log in via the standard username/password). You would have to reserve space a few days in advance via a terminal in the hallways.

    Honestly, I thought the practice of it was horrible. It was a good idea on theory - it would save office space by having those who were at client sites the majority of the time not reserve "hotel" space, but it kept the work environment really sterile and doctor's office like. Kinda creeped me out. I remember a few emails going out about a few employees who would keep all their things in one "hotel" and keep reserving it, and how if they continued, their things would be removed for them.

    It just seemed rather impersonal. Plus, if you reserved space, and someone else came in your space and decided to use it, and that person had more senority than you -- well... you'd just be out of luck until that person decided to finish up whatever. I missed more than a few online/phone-based training sessions due to this :)

    Anyhoo, just my thoughts.

  196. why should she? by hawk · · Score: 2
    unless she gets there early enough to get the money collection job tomorrow, she doesn't get the benefit of the fertilizer.


    hawk, refraining from pointing out that there is no such job, and that that's just some lady who wandered in and takies advantage of gullible tourists :)