Slashdot Mirror


AOpen Debuts The Funniest Motherboard Ever

Anonymous Coward X-11 writes "Has AOpen gone flipping nuts by putting vacuum tubes on its motherboards? AX4B-533Tube No, it's not replacing logic ICs with discrete components. The tubes are part of the on board audio. Not sure if they are serious about this. April 1 was two months ago." As an owner of a tube headphone amplifier I applaud AOpen's move to accomodate the high-end audio enthusiast, while simultaneous wondering about the ability of a switched psu to properly drive a tube amplification stage cleanly. There's no way this is for real, right? Right? Here's a link that seems to work pretty well. And this looks pretty, well, real. Update: /. reader Jedi1USA noted that HardOCP has more pics of the board.

473 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Oh that's what I need... by spoco2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    More heat in my PC Box... that's a top idea. In fact, along with a couple of valves, let's throw in a few radiator elements, then you could have a PC case that you can cook mashmallows on.... mmmm, sweet, sticky goodness.

    1. Re:Oh that's what I need... by squarefish · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's only a matter of time before some mod bastard figures out how to water cool the tube!

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    2. Re:Oh that's what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and loads of harmonic distortion, microphonics from fans and disks, plus various parasitics. Excellent!

      I also hear that if you carefully go around the edges of the CPU case with a green feltmarker it'll take away some of the "grittiness" from the DACs on your soundboard. No lie!

    3. Re:Oh that's what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a PC case that you can cook mashmallows on....

      Maybe not marshmallows, but an Athlon-powered coffee mug warmer would kick ass.

    4. Re:Oh that's what I need... by j1mmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      sweet sticky goodness? my pc gets plenty of that, what with all the porn ...

    5. Re:Oh that's what I need... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      sweet sticky goodness? my pc gets plenty of that, what with all the porn ...

      ewww...I don't think we needed to know about that...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Oh that's what I need... by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      I'm waiting for the new pornMAC with the case which holds a tub of vasoline and a tissue box.

      --
      * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
    7. Re:Oh that's what I need... by ecarlson · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you water cooled the tube, it would stop working. The tube contains a heating element that heats it up so it will function.

      --
      - Eric, InvisibleRobot.com
    8. Re:Oh that's what I need... by PeolesDru · · Score: 1

      I especially like how the tube ends up near the bottom of a tower - such that it's rising heat keeps the processor in its optimal high-heat environment.

    9. Re:Oh that's what I need... by Phork · · Score: 5, Informative

      umm, there are water cooled tubes, uasualy they occur in RF amps, some older FmM broadcast stations used water cooled tubes in their finals. Water cooling a tube will let it work at a higher current than it is rated for. Basically the water cooling is to keep it from getting any hotter than it is supposed to get. The water cooling doesnt take it down to 50 deg F, it keeps it at the ideal operating temperature.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    10. Re:Oh that's what I need... by eddeye · · Score: 1

      > mmmm, sweet, sticky goodness.

      My pc already brings me sweet, sticky goodness. Oh wait, you're not talking about pr0n...

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
    11. Re:Oh that's what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water cooling a tube will let it work at a higher current than it is rated for.

      So you are basically overclocking a vacuum tube.

    12. Re:Oh that's what I need... by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Water cooling a vacuum tube would actually probably cause it to explode.

    13. Re:Oh that's what I need... by LightJockey · · Score: 1

      Yup, and I've seen 'em... they need about as much water as a large laser to cool, but DAMN, its an impressive sight.

      Besides, how ELSE do you keep a 200-kilowatt triode at its optimum temperature, seeing as how it has no thermally-conductive surfaces to attach a heatsink or some kind of TEC device? But its basically a thermos though, no air inside. If you think a normal tube gets hot on the OUTSIDE, imagine what the components INSIDE are going through, taking into account that a vaccuum will slow down the transfer of heat via radiation...

      --
      Mouse, Mice. Goose, Geese. Moose... Moose?
    14. Re:Oh that's what I need... by devilbat · · Score: 1

      My favorite conribution from the high end audio nutcases *HAS* to be the $100.00+ high end digital interconnect. Someone should splain' to them that with a digital signal, you either get it, or you don't get it. There is no in between.

    15. Re:Oh that's what I need... by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Water Cooled Tubes are in many high power modern RF transmitters ... I have yet to see a solid state high power AM transmitter. Semiconductors can just not take the power load.

      Water cooled tubes are designed and built to be water cooled. When I did college radio we had an Old Harris transmitter that use to melt the tubes on us (as in the tube would come out as a glob of glass). We replaced it with a prototype first generation Harris Solid State FM transmitter ... and was in 1995.

      Check out Harris for more information on high end RF systems. Hmmm... looks like they do have solid state high power AM transmitters now ... amazing

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
    16. Re:Oh that's what I need... by jovlinger · · Score: 2

      s/radiation/convection/

      and i'd agree with you.

    17. Re:Oh that's what I need... by ecarlson · · Score: 1

      I worked at a small AM radio station a couple of decades ago. I still have one of the dead tubes from the transmitter -- Impressive thing. But that station wasn't powerful enough to require water cooling (or maybe it was, and that explanis the dead tube I have).

      --
      - Eric, InvisibleRobot.com
    18. Re:Oh that's what I need... by WNight · · Score: 2

      Probably not, if you started cooling it before turning it on.

      The cracking of glass comes when part of it is hotter than the rest and the uneven expansion causes stress.

      Glass that can take quick heating and freezing isn't as tough as it is low-expansion over the normal heat range.

      However, water cooling a tube would probably be mostly useless. You'd be cooling the glass, the part that rarely suffers heat-related damage, and pumping more power to the inards, the stuff protected from losing heat to the glass by a nice vacuum.

    19. Re:Oh that's what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the iWank?

  3. My dad says... by ColGraff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My dad claims that some people like the sound of vacuum tube amps, so maybe this isn't nuts. But how do they deal with unfortunate tendency of vacuum tubes to burn out?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:My dad says... by Raven1 · · Score: 1

      Better sound comes at a price.

    2. Re:My dad says... by pryan · · Score: 2

      It's common knowledge with audiophiles and professional musicians that vacuum tubes are better than solid state technologies at reproducing sound. The highest quality amplifiers in the world use tubes. Most classical concert halls use tube amplifiers.

    3. Re:My dad says... by caca_phony · · Score: 1

      People like the distortion of tubes (everything that touches analog distorts) because it is closer to a natural distortion of a sound (like that caused by hearing damage or a wierd room or whatever) than transistor distortion (which, ironicly, has no natural analog to its distorting behavior).

      --
      ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
    4. Re:My dad says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be, but they are using a ac 97 chip and those suck more then p0rn stars

    5. Re:My dad says... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but tubes don't automatically mean better sound. Junk is junk with tubes or without. There are plenty of tube amps that sound like crap.

    6. Re:My dad says... by sopwath · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. While I do enjoy the sound of a nice tube amp, there are plenty of solid state devices that are many times more clear than anything a tube can produce. Music does tend to be an emotional experience, it should be IMO, so you might like the sound of tube to resistors. That doesn't mean they are better.

      sopwath

    7. Re:My dad says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Classical concerts are not electronically amplified. That's ridiculous.

    8. Re:My dad says... by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      Err... you replace them?

    9. Re:My dad says... by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, the thing is that tubes distort harmonically while solid state amps tend to distort rather dissonantly and horribly.

    10. Re:My dad says... by RadioheadKid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most classical concert halls use tube amplifiers.

      As someone who has worked in the sound re-inforcement business, yes tube amps sound great, audio-philes love them, but well designed transitor amps can sound great too, and are much more practical, power efficent, smaller and cooler (temperature) I'd like to see some evidence to back up your vague statement.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    11. Re:My dad says... by ShinGouki · · Score: 3, Informative

      same way you deal with tubes in amps when they burn out. simple 3-step process:

      1) buy new tube
      2) remove old tube
      3) insert new tube

      entire operation takes about 30 minutes (assuming you live 10 minutes from a music store with tubes ;P)

      i've got an ampeg bass head (1200 watts (!)) that i can re-tube completely in about 10 minutes total...not really that hard an operation :)

      --
      -dk
      Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
    12. Re:My dad says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, the normal method of repair, as I recall, is to replace the tube.

    13. Re:My dad says... by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'd like to see some evidence to back up your vague statement

      This isn't evidence, per say, but as a semi-serious guitar player I can tell you that solid state guitar amps tend to sound harsh and sterile, while tube amps have a warmer sound to them. Modern effects processing can simulate tube amps quite well, though. I've never heard of anybody prefering a tube amp in their home stereo.

    14. Re:My dad says... by EverDense · · Score: 1

      But how do they deal with unfortunate tendency of vacuum tubes to burn out?

      Mount them on the front of the case.
      Hope they'll light up, and look really cool.
      If one burns out, they'll be easy to replace.

      My Dad is bigger than your Dad.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    15. Re:My dad says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      per say

      I'll bet you think the phrase means something like "for each time spoken." Well it doesn't. And it's spelled per se.

    16. Re:My dad says... by norton_I · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, there is a difference between a guitar amp and a stereo amp. For a guitar, the amp is really part of the instrument. Tube amps definately do mess with the sound, but the player desires that to get the sound they want.

      For stereo use, the goal of the amp is (or should be) to reproduce with the highest fidelity possible the sound as recorded. There, while tube amps tend to be better than "cheap" solid state amps, a high end SS amp is at least as good as a high end tube amp.

      I do know people, however, who prefer tubes on their stereo for whatever reason (mostly snobbery, IMHO). A lot of audiophile companies make ones with tube pre-amps and a SS final stage and/or all tubes. I haven't found these systems to sound particularly better than some high end SS amps.

    17. Re:My dad says... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1
      I really wanted to take your post seriously, that is until I read the word "audiophiles". Audiophiles, i.e. morons who buy pure silver speaker cables and special sound-improving lotions to bathe their CDs in (I'm not kidding) at horrendous prices can't possibly be taken seriously.

      Back to the topic, yes, humans like the way tube amps sound, because they add a kind of distortion that makes the music sound "warm". On the other hand, Hi-Fi stands for High Fidelity, and tube amps aren't. If you want the music to sound like when it was recorded, get a decent solid state amp. If you want to shell out insane amounts of money for an inferior product, buy a tube amp and listen to it while you drive to work on your steam tractor. Info on audio, amps (and how to build your own): Rod Elliott's Pages.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    18. Re:My dad says... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      Almost every guitar amp you've ever heard is tube powered. All serious (or non-broke) guitarists use tube amps because of the warm natural distortion of tubes and the ability to punch up the gain to get a very distinct distorted crunch. Solid state sounds flat compared to the tube.

      In audiophile circles its pretty much the same deal, you can get a nice warm but low-keyed 'distortion' out of an amp that many audiophiles prefer to solid state.

    19. Re:My dad says... by phliar · · Score: 3, Informative
      And my dad says tubes suck, smoke signals made by an authentic wool blanket and damp mesquite is the only way to go. I bet my dad can beat up your dad.
      Most classical concert halls use tube amplifiers.
      Classical concert halls use no amplification -- what you kids would call "unplugged." (I am a musician. I also have season tickets to the San Francisco Symphony.)

      You can design a solid-state amplifier that has exactly the same distortion and non-linearities of tube amps (but why?) -- that's not good enough for golden-ear audiophiles though. They'd rather listen to their "Test LP" on their custom turntables and talk about sound-stage separation and the "special warmth" added by the special green CD markers and about how analog is obviously better than digital because what if the signal changes between those digital samples? Me, I'd prefer no distorion, and in any case I'd rather spend my time and money on music, not equipment.

      (There are a couple of reasons to use tubes, where solid state devices don't work very well: very high power applications, like broadcast radio and TV transmitters' final stage RF amplifiers; and microwave tubes, like klystrons and magnetrons.)

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    20. Re:My dad says... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      The highest quality amplifiers in the world use tubes. Most classical concert halls use tube amplifiers.

      They may in the US. The classical concert halls I am familiar with use live performers without amplification of any kind...

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    21. Re:My dad says... by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      And it should be noted that this won't improve the sound quality of your 112Kbps MP3's.

      Also, i want to know about digital capabilities. Does the board have a breakout box, or optical out / in? Plus when you plug a minijack into the back, you're getting a low level out (passive), and it gets sent to your Klipsch pro medias to be amplified, which are decidedly solid state. Isn't that going to degrade the sound.

      Don't get me wrong, i WANT this board, but i need to know more about it first, and the first link is down.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    22. Re:My dad says... by ninewands · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Quoth the poster:

      It's common knowledge with audiophiles and professional musicians that vacuum tubes are better than solid state technologies at reproducing sound.

      It's common knowledge (among audio engineers, because MOST "audiophiles and professional musicians" don't understand the electronics involved) that a vacuum tube power amplifier operated in a push-pull configuration and biased for Class A operation produces less distortion than the designs commonly used for solid-state power amps. HOWEVER, a solid-state PA operating under the same conditions will produce just as clean an output and waste just as much power and generate as much, if not MORE heat.

      That being said, I read the tech specs on the board and find it a woefully inadequate attempt to cash in on the "coolness factor" alleged to apply to tube amps for audio.

      The tube on the mobo is a dual triode. Since it's being fronted by a stereo sound circuit, push-pull design is out of the question. It's just a straight-up dual-channel, single-ended power amplifier. This coupled with the fact that (IIRC) most multi-section tubes are directly-heated (the filament IS the cathode instead of just a heat source), indicate that improvement in perceived audio quality will be minimal at best.

      Without seeing the schematic for the amp, I can't give an opinion about it's stability, but triodes tend to be fairly susceptible to parasitic oscillations if they are operated at more than moderate power gain without HEAVY bypassing. This hefty use of capacitive filtering is what gives tube amps their reputation for "warmer sound". The fact is that a lot of the higher frequencies are bled off by the bypass capacitors.

      Class A amps typically have a plate efficiency of 35 percent or less. This, coupled with the existence of the tube's filament (heater, for the Brits among us) indicate that the tube is going to produce PRODIGIOUS amounts of heat for a minimal improvement (if any) in true audio quality.

      In short, I see it as a "gimmick" mobo.

    23. Re:My dad says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will improve the sound quality of m 112Kbps MP3's? I have about 1000 of them from 5 or 6 years ago that I'd love not to have to throw away. Unfortunately they sound like complete crap compared to my CD collection I just ripped at 192Kbps. I tried VBR settings and even ripping at 320Kbps but it seems 192Kbps offers the best balance of excellent sound quality and small file size. 320Kbps file were nearly 80% bigger at no noticeable increase in sound quality.

      BTW: My Dad would have loved to see this. He was a real tube freak and grew up building radios out of vacuum tubes. He always thought transistors were crap and never touched computers. hehe. :-)

    24. Re:My dad says... by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      All serious (or non-broke) guitarists use tube amps because of the warm natural distortion of tubes and the ability to punch up the gain to get a very distinct distorted crunch. Solid state sounds flat compared to the tube.
      True, but I wonder why they don't digitize the signal, apply any distortion curve they want, then convert back to analog. All the benefits of transistors, but you can dial in any distortion and other effects you can imagine.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    25. Re:My dad says... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, audiophiles don't want any 'distortion' at all. My Karmon-Kardon tube integrated amplifier's chief virtue is it's very very low noise. Mediocre solid state design (as opposed to the good design in the Yamaha solid state Integrated amplifier I currently use), particularly in the preamplifier state, produces a 'hiss' noise.

      If I crank the volume up all the way on the H-K amp set to 'phono' there's no hiss noise at all. Then when the tone arm hits the vinyl cranked up like that it throws you across the room. It's all about Signal to Noise ratios.

      I retired the H-K amp a few years ago when I could (finally) afford a solid state amp that was of the same class. It needs new caps and probably a new set of tubes, and it's just not worth it. I should probably hawk it on eBay to somebody.

      Tube amplifiers for guitars are used specifically for the kind of distortion they produce. It's a 'cultural' thing, not a technical thing.

    26. Re:My dad says... by Eil · · Score: 2


      It's common knowledge with audiophiles and professional musicians that vacuum tubes are better than solid state technologies at reproducing sound.

      But it's not-so-common knowledge that solid state technologies can reproduce the exact same sound as tube amps. In fact, digital equipment can reproduce any sound with any quality distinguishable to human ears.

      Then why do we still keep hearing people remark about how tube amps are just "better" without offering any further explanation? The answer: tube amps add a defining "warm" quality to the sound, whereas solid state circuitry reproduces it quite a lot more accurately (but not always perfectly depending on your equipment, same goes for tube amps, actually) than tube amps. That is, without the "warm" quality.

      It's not about quality or which is better, it's about the characteristics that get added to the sound due to the type of components in the circuitry.

      I'm not bashing those who like tube amps, just pointing out that solid state and digital are not inferior, just more accurate. A lot of people don't want accurate sound, they want nice sound. I can't say I disagree with them, honestly.

    27. Re:My dad says... by Woek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Genuinely curious: what's not solid state about a tube amplifier?

    28. Re:My dad says... by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1
      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    29. Re:My dad says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you that solid state guitar amps tend to sound harsh and sterile, while tube amps have a warmer sound to them.
      Thank 2nd order, and even order harmonic distortion - much more pleasant than odd order distortion which is characteristic of most solid state devices and circuits.
      That, and the smoothly clipping amplifier output transformer of a tube guitar amp. Tubes rule guitar amplification and never really lost their dominance there even after the introduction of transistors. I am not a guitar player but everyone I've known who played, preferred tube amps and covetted and shelled out buxx for the sound. I knew the reason, which was meaningless to them and rightfully so. Tubes just sounded right, end of story and end of their interest in the subject.

      Now as to home audio amplification, again some people would rather have a tube amplifier set, provided it will adequately drive their speakers and provided they can afford what they want. I have personally sold tube amps from 1000 - 6000 dollars for a pair of stereo channels and worked in a store that even sold 13,000 dollar models occasionally. That was a few years ago.
      Tube amps have limitations and I've certainly heard some transistor amps I liked too (they were often even more expensive than the tube amps I found acceptable)but the tube magic is very real for audio, not a fairy tale.

      I no longer sell high end audio or follow it as a hobby after a series of illnesses wrecked the quality of my hearing.

      If someone said here's 35,000 dollars for you to do with as you wish, but you must spend it on stereo gear I might end up with a pair of tube amps, but it would really depend on the speaker I settled on. Tube amps have a high output impedance and some fine speakers with complex crossovers present funky loads that dip into the 1Ohm range and really don't deliver their best except with wickedly built solid state amps.

      Vacuum Tubes in a PC motherboard is a ridiculous concept, though.

    30. Re:My dad says... by lucius · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cathode rays.

    31. Re:My dad says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why do we still keep hearing people remark about how tube amps are just "better" without offering any further explanation?

      [...]That is, without the "warm" quality

      Really, the "warming" effect (compression) is caused by the output transformers that are needed because of the tube power amp stage. This type of signal compression produces a better sounding harmonic distortion (when overdriven) than the "clipped" type produced by solid state amplifiers. The "Bright" sounding preamp sections can be duplicated easily with transistors, but a tube amp allows you to change preamp tubes to "tailor" the level of capicitance to match the sound your after.

      ...So really, the tubes have little to do with the sound. Electrons don't care how they're amplified.

      I'll tell you that I think tube amps are better (for instruments), and the explanation is above.

    32. Re:My dad says... by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      It's common knowledge (among audio engineers, because MOST "audiophiles and professional musicians" don't understand the electronics involved) that a vacuum tube power amplifier operated in a push-pull configuration and biased for Class A operation produces less distortion than the designs commonly used for solid-state power amps. HOWEVER, a solid-state PA operating under the same conditions will produce just as clean an output and waste just as much power and generate as much, if not MORE heat.


      OK, I'm confused just a bit here: how can a push-pull amp be biased for Class A? Both drivers in the totem-pole would be on continuously. Wouldn't the varying current in one transistor affect the operating point of the other? I don't know much about amplifier design, but this seems odd.
    33. Re:My dad says... by TaliesinWI · · Score: 2, Informative

      I completely agree about the "gimmick" mobo moniker. This tube is going to provide a warm glow to the inside of the case more than it's going to affect the sound.
      I also can't imagine what kind of microphonics (surrounding vibration being transmitted thru the tube and ending up as noise) you'd have here.

      And although it's gratifying to see people pointing out the difference in what the tubes are "for" in a tube guitar amp and a home audio amp, there are the people coming out on the whole "pleasant distortion" thing, but then dropping it in the dust without really explaining what they mean.

      So, here goes (I'm grossly simplifying to try and keep this brief):

      Simply put, tubes add more distortion than transistors. However, tubes add most of their distortion in the even harmonics of a tone, whereas transistors add distortion in the odd harmonics of a tone. Why does this matter? Because the way we humans tell various instruments apart is in the amount of harmonics that the instrument produces for a particular fundamental (this is called timbre). This is why even though a flute and a guitar are both playing A440, they sound radically different. Naturally occuring musical harmonics are "even", that is, even multiples of the fundamental frequency.
      So, when a tube amp reproduces the sound of a saxophone, it _is_ distorting the signal by amplifying, for example, the second, fourth, and sixth harmonics. Our brain takes these "natural" harmonics and internally boosts the level of the fundamental tone - in other words, we are psychologically reconstructing the musical note as slightly "louder" than it actually is.
      In comparison, the transistor amps, while producing far less total harmonic distortion (the vaunted THD that we see in so many specs), are actually producing more "unnatural" distortion, because they are affecting the odd harmonics of a given tone, even slightly. Since these harmonics are not "naturally occuring", our ear-brain doesn't compensate for them in the same terms, so it registers as... well, kind of odd. More grain on the sound of a string. Harshness in wind instruments, etc.
      In some ways, the tube/transistor battle is "pick your poison", kind of like the whole digital/analog debate. Some people argue that music should be reproduced with as little distortion as possible, so transistor/digital is the way to go. Other take the position that distortion-free sound reproduction is impossible, so if you're going to have it, might as well make it the kind that is more "natural" - tube/analog.
      (Yes, I know I've trivialized lots of the debate - I'm not going to re-fight the audiophile wars here.)
      In the end, it's what Sounds Better to You.

      And for what it's worth, I own both tube and transistor equipment, and own a CD player and a turntable.

    34. Re:My dad says... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      But he was right. He stated that it's common knowledge among audiophiles that tube amps are superior.
      Just like they know that vinyl is superior to anything digital.

      That I'll agree with. Not that they are right.. but they definately think so.

    35. Re:My dad says... by JCMay · · Score: 1

      Tube amps are "vapor state" circuits, as the conduction path is a vapor.

    36. Re:My dad says... by shadowsong · · Score: 1

      Very true. For those of you who think vaccum tubes are old school, go see an orchestra concert, or better yet, an opera! Larynx, sinuses and the mouth: now that is an old school amplifier.

    37. Re:My dad says... by ninewands · · Score: 2

      how can a push-pull amp be biased for Class A? Both drivers in the totem-pole would be on continuously.

      That's true, the definition of Class A operation is that the stage passes current at all times. The 2 active devices of a push-pull amp operate 180 degrees out of phase to each other, but if the power supply is properly designed and regulated, they don't feel each other anywhere but at the output.

      BTW, most "audiophile amps" that use a push-pull output stage tend to be biased for Class B operation (each device conducts for exactly 180 degrees of the cycle. This operation induces switching transients into the signal when the devices switch off and on at the zero crossing, but they are minor and rarely audible, and Class B operation is MUCH more efficient in terms of power out vs. power drawn from the supply.

    38. Re:My dad says... by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But it's not-so-common knowledge that solid state technologies can reproduce the exact same sound as tube amps. In fact, digital equipment can reproduce any sound with any quality distinguishable to human ears.

      I'm on the whole "solid state is good for music" wavelength with you, but guitar amps are kinda a special case - they are designed to be driven past the "normal" limits, and it's that breakdown in fidelity that a tube provides (and which is unique to each variant of tube) that you're after. Sure you can model the whole thing, but at a certain point, getting the sound right when you're laying down a strong bass with harsh pops with your thumb while going up and down the high treble hammering and sliding... well, it really just is easier to use an "analog" devide like a tube. It's the subilty of the extremes that tubes get right - or rather, they get it wrong, and that's what's wanted. And to 99.9% of people who listen to the music, it makes no difference whatso*ever*. But, when you're performing, you can hear the difference between your fingernails at one length and 1/16th of an inch longer, and for a musician, it's all about the tiny little details. Hell, I play almost entirely acoustic nowadays, and I like listening to the sound slowly alter in the morning in the woods as the humidity changes as the sun burns off the fog and dew. Does that mean that I care? Hell no... I just *notice* - that's what musicians do when they play. Each musician cares about different things... some *really* care about their amp sound. More power to them.

      You can hear all sorts of things in high fidelity headphones while listening to Zeppelin or the Beatles - talking off to the side, older demo tracks, etc. They were never *intended* to be played on high quality speakers with a recording as good as the master. (And if you're listening _solely_ for those little things, you're doing what someone up above pointed out - audiophiles listen to noise, not music) Kinda like how SciFi props for TV shows look like painted crap in real life - they are intended to be shown on a really fuzzy NTSC or PAL screen. Fidelity is great to a point - movie soundtracks are much more clean than most albums simply because they *know* they are going to be played in a digital theater, whereas albums are (usually) meant to be enjoyed for the music.

      Let the musicians be anal about the sound - it's your job to get laid with the music going on in the background, or blare it while driving down main street with your buddies singing along, or sob into your beer about how that guy on the jukebox is singing about how she left you, or otherwise just make part of your life. I've spent my time in darkness in a comfy chair, eyes closed, listening to good headphones... the goal is still the same: Enjoy your music.

      --
      Evan "First got laid to Grateful Dead, was listening to the Brandenburgs when I found out about 9-11, listening to Crowded House, Kill Eye right now".

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  4. Re:w00t by TheProteus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bet you've got a 12AX7 on there, considering they said it had a 'dual triode' tube in there. They're also some of the cheapest valves out there.

    --

    Detachment 3 Media
    Exposed, Exploited, Exploded

  5. Re:Ahhh... by 3th3rn3t · · Score: 0, Troll

    next thing we will see will be "Coax display output" ... go figure , some people never learn !

  6. who are they kidding? by hifizen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As an audiophile and electrical engineer, I can tell you that no serious music (tech) lover will take this seriously. It's common knowledge amongst audiophiles that high quality audio can only be reproduced outside the electrically noisy environment inside a PC case. But more than that, audiophiles are a particular, fussy lot, and they all have their own preferences for this tube type or that.

    Who are you kidding, AOpen? Leave the high-end audio to the specialists, and leave it off your mobo!

    Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    1. Re:who are they kidding? by User+956 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can tell you that no serious music (tech) lover will take this seriously.

      Most musicians are not engineers, and vice/versa. (I happen to be both, so I'll be glad to translate). Musicians are interested in sound production, and everyone else in sound REproduction. These are two totally unrelated things. A guitar amp is SUPPOSED to add distortion and tonal coloration to the signal. In fact tests for frequency response and distortion as applied to Hi-Fidelity equipment mean nothing when done on a guitar amplifier. We WANT to modify the original sound. That's exactly what the designers at Martin were doing from day 1. An acoustic guitar has a resonating chamber, a sound hole, and a front and back surface that act as diaphragms. If we could plot the frequency response of a single string played back on a good acoustic guitar, we would see all kinds of nastiness. Violins... the same thing. Saxophones... ditto. Pianos... of course. The sound quality of an instrument, what we call timbre (pronounced tam'ber) is a highly desired characteristic. It's what separates the Steinways from the Wulitzer uprights and the Martins from the Hondos, you get the idea.

      In an electric instrument, there are no resonating chambers to add flavor, so we add it with distortion instead. Distortion, the crux of the biscuit..... sometimes we want it, other times we don't. That's what always bugs engineers and audiophiles alike. When you're trying to REproduce an already distorted sound, you don't want to add any additional distortion from the amplifiers. And you certainly don't want to add transistor distortion products. Sometimes tube distortion on a clean signal is OK. What, did I just contradict myself? No way, Jose'.

      Here's the point of this whole exercise:

      TUBE AMPLIFIERS SOUND DIFFERENT FROM TRANSISTOR AMPLIFIERS PRIMARILY WHEN THEY DISTORT!

      You can see it on a o'scope, hear it with your ears, and prove it on paper, so I know it's true. And here's why: Transistors and tubes use different principles of physics for operation. Valve amps (the original name for tube amplifiers) are basically voltage driven, so when they distort, even-order harmonics are produced (2nd, 4th, 6th, etc...) while transistor amps are current driven and produce odd-order harmonics (3rd, 5th, 7th, etc....) When you look at them both on an oscilloscope, the transistor amp flattens out the waveform, while the tube amp sort of makes a triangle wave. If we look at the inherent resonances of acoustic instruments we find that things like violins make lots of even order harmonics, while things like clarinets make lots of odd order harmonics.

      Now, do we want our guitar to sound more like a violin, or a clarinet? Ah yes, the violin is much more "sweet" sounding. That's because the human brain likes and will tolerate much more even-order distortion than it will odd-order. One of the great distortion boxes in recent history is the Aphex Aural Exciter. The guys who designed this thing were marketing geniuses. The original units were sealed boxes with tamper proof hardware. They were leased to studios for final mix down. Once a few big artists like Linda Rondstat and Fleetwood Mac used and liked them, their place in audio gadgetry was assured. Of course they just use a clever method of picking out the fundamental note of say a human voice, making a little distortion, and adding it back to the original signal. This adds "warmth" or "depth" to the sound that can be, well, exciting. Our theory about odd vs. even distortion holds up because while the first units made lots of odd harmonics, several years later I remember an engineering release that hyped a new distortion circuit with increased the 2nd order distortions, while reducing the 3rd order products. Sound's very interesting doesn't it? They made a way to produce "tube" sound in a device that's basically used on vocals and strings. Again, the brain likes even-order distortion while finding odd-order somewhat irritating.

      There's some tricks to be used for making distortion. You can get transistors that are voltage driven called MOSFETS. In my opinion, they can be made to sound like tubes if properly designed. Also, once a signal is digitized, it can be made to sound like anything in theory, if the proper algorithm is applied. The problem is, they've been working on the sound of a Strat going through a Marshall for a long time. It's hard to beat the sound of a well designed tube amp, but they're beginning to learn how. Some of the new Multi-EFX boxes like the Quadraverb do an amazing job at processing a guitar. But I've found that they still need to go through a speaker to smooth out the sound. (There's additional distortion, coloration and bandwidth limiting produced by all loudspeakers)

      Now for all you guys and gals who like their transistor amps and fuzz boxes, there's nothing wrong with what you do. Sometimes odd-harmonics are needed to cut through the mix. I sometimes purposefully loop a guitar track back into an overdriven channel on my board just to "dirty" it up a little. It can make a bland lead really stand out at times. But it's just a matter of taste. I really like the even-order distorted, bandwidth limited, compressed sound of a traditional tube amp for guitar.

      But REproduction is a different story. I've got preamps that are rated in parts-per-million distortion. I tweak all my tape decks for the flattest response possible, and work hard to get the best signal-to-noise ratio possible. That's because I like the final sound to be as faithful to the original as possible.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:who are they kidding? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "As an audiophile and electrical engineer, I can tell you that no serious music (tech) lover will take this seriously. It's common knowledge amongst audiophiles that high quality audio can only be reproduced outside the electrically noisy environment inside a PC case."

      True, and PCs themselves are acoustically noisy as well. What's the point of super high fidelity sound reproduction when you've got hard drives, dvdroms and fans whirring in the background?

    3. Re:who are they kidding? by hifizen · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, not to mention, tubes are also microphonic! That's right, folks - now you can listen to the hum of your PC amplified through it's audio circuits!

      Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    4. Re:who are they kidding? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      that was my reaction :) I have some tube-amps in my guitar rig and I can't get them *NEAR* my computer because they pickup the volumes of EM noise that are currently makeing me sterile :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    5. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there any specs on the site?

      with an external power suppply and good dacs. i think it could be done.

    6. Re:who are they kidding? by Shelled · · Score: 2

      Don't look at it as a stab at high end audio, but as a classic example of the wonderful lunacy of the Far East audiophilia. This is after all the region where audiophiles first went nuts over the sound of 1930's film-house Western Electric tube amplifiers, some powerhouses at 10 watts, spawning hundreds of lower power (!) iterations costing thousands per channel.

    7. Re:who are they kidding? by killerbobjr · · Score: 1

      No serious audiophile will take the D/A conversion of the on board AC'97 codec seriously either. The noise, jitter, and non-linearity of those cheap convertors make them only good enough for the beeps and boops of your system sound effects, no matter how many tubes you put on the motherboard.

    8. Re:who are they kidding? by tedDancin · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Tubes are a hassle and can cause problems heating up, and having to be replaced. Having used various tube guitar amps in my time, I can say having a VOX is great for getting that Beatles-esque sound, but god damn you don't need it on-board. Really, AOpen? I could spend my money on better things, like a gold plated hard drive, or a keyboard made of candy!

      ... mmmm candy....

      --

      Ladies, form queue here -->
    9. Re:who are they kidding? by SWTP · · Score: 1

      It use to be if you had a good charge could fry the logic of a board. Not it can fry you! ^_^

      PS: Edison is not the orginator of the amplified vacum tube but the light blub. A man by the name of Forester about 100 years ago did it.

      PSS: Guess I need to dust off all of that old tube knowledge and start packing that ancient tube checker on service calls now!

    10. Re:who are they kidding? by optikSmoke · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can tell you that no serious music (tech) lover will take this seriously.

      Though I am not too knowledgeable in the particulars of audio/music tech, I gather from your comments and others that this board is not geared towards people who actually know anything about sound, but rather those overabundant people who believe to their core they know everything about it, and don't..... I happen to know one or two. Blaargggh

    11. Re:who are they kidding? by paxil · · Score: 1

      PS: Edison is not the orginator of the amplified vacum tube but the light blub. A man by the name of Forester about 100 years ago did it.

      Dont you mean Lee DeForest?

    12. Re:who are they kidding? by MadCamel · · Score: 1

      I find, that for low-bitrate mp3's and other such digitaly degraded music, a tube amp is the best thing to sweeten up the sound. I run a low THD amp for everything below 300hz, everything above goes to a nice lil tube amp. Analog distortion does wonders for digitily degraded sound, it adds harmonics and generaly livens up the sound, removing that "flatness" that is otherwise quite hard to get rid of. A motherboard with a tube amp doesn't sound like such a good idea to me though, a shielded external [pre]amp would be a much better choice, tubes are EMI/RFI sensitive, and computers are *NOISY*.

    13. Re:who are they kidding? by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2

      Edison, however, discovered that a heated filament emmited electrons. In fact, this phenomenon (at the heart of all vaccum tube technology) is called the "Edison effect". AFAIK, it was his only discovery in pure science.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    14. Re:who are they kidding? by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > high quality audio can only be reproduced outside the electrically noisy environment inside a PC case

      Not strictly true--just use adequate RF sheilding. I use my PC for everything, including sound that would even be pleasing to audiophiles who didn't know where it was coming from. I use a modified high-end soundcard sheilded all around down to the sides of the PCI slot, and I've made a DIY Corda-type headphone amp (thanks, Head-Fi.org and Headwize.com!)inside a sheilded drive-bay box. Nothing is truly "external" to the PC, though it may as well be because the effect of the sheilding is the same.

      RF sheilding and Faraday cages, people! It *can* be done, with a lot of elbow grease.

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    15. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he didn't even discover that. he *did* improve it a
      lot, but at least a couple of europeans were ahead of him...

    16. Re:who are they kidding? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      If you are spending mucho dinero on your amp, why are you running low bit rate mp3s through it, surely you can afford a larger hard drive (for higher bitrate mp3s) or some CDs. Better yet a turn table and records.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    17. Re:who are they kidding? by plastik55 · · Score: 2

      What have you done about your power supply? The switching supplies usually found in PCs can produce a lot of noise which will find its way to the sound card no matter how well it's shielded.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    18. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By transistor remember, MOSFET just means MOSFE Transistor. You can find companies advertising MOSFET amplifiers from the low-end to the highest end.

      It all depends on the circuit design and personal preferences anyway.

    19. Re:who are they kidding? by Ogerman · · Score: 2

      Analog distortion does wonders for digitily degraded sound, it adds harmonics and generaly livens up the sound, removing that "flatness" that is otherwise quite hard to get rid of.

      You can do the same thing with DSP. Try the "Crystality" plugin for xmms. A little Freeverb might also help if it's a terribly flat recording. There are also some LADSPA plugins that might be useful.. tube sims, harmonics processors, etc.

    20. Re:who are they kidding? by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      The guy's long post above is dead on. Yes, MOSFETs are transistors (Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors, in fact: MOSFETs), but the point is that MOSFETs, like vacuum tubes are voltage amplification devices, while all other transistors are current amplification devices. This has huge consequences when the resulting signal goes through subsequent reactive loads (like the coils of the speakers, or the capacitors of filters).

      None of this of course has anything directly to do with the original article, which simply must be a joke.

      BTW, Even farther off-topic: know anyone who wants a professional tube tester? This thing is a classic, which changable modules of tube sockets, a scroll of tube types with test settings, vernier pots for setting the filiment and plate voltages, locking resettable push buttons that configure test signals, oscillators, reactances, etc. It belonged to my father, who was an electrical engineer for AT&T in the 60's and Control Data in the 70's and 80's. He had a commercial RT license (he did microwave transmitter maintenence for AT&T) and he was a ham. When I waqs kid he had a home business for Hi-fi and TV repair in his home. He had a complete electronics lab and parts shop down there. He died a few years ago and we're parting with the stuff we can stand to part with. The tub tester is way cool, but I have hardly any devices with tubes. Contact me if you are interested.

    21. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell me you're one of those people who thinks vinyl sounds better than plastic... Come on! At least technically speaking, there's a lot more signal bandwidth in even a 44.1kHz/16bit CDDA recording than most (all) vinyl/turntable combinations can reproduce.

    22. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually MOSFETs are not voltage amplifiers. They're better thought of (and modeled) as voltage controlled current sources.

    23. Re:who are they kidding? by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      This explains some things. I had a tube receiver about 20 years ago made by a company named "Scott". Even with really, really bad speakers, I thought it had a nice, sweet sound. I think there was a problem though, as a couple of the four main output tubes would glow red-hot! This receiver also made summers in Florida just a bit hotter.

      What's really odd though, is the only thing I remember listening to at the time, was REO Speedwagon. What's up with that?

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
    24. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean DeForest Kelly.

      "He's dead, Jim"

    25. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it doesn't have much effect.

      I use a M-Audio 2496 card (which has no special shielding) in a home recording setup. The noise is down below 85 dB (and other cards do even better).

      Worse is the physical (fan and hard disk) noise. Location or a bit of hacking (diskless, fanless, networked PC) solves that.

    26. Re:who are they kidding? by shoe555 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? Audiophile?

      As a musician who's watched the music world go from tube to solid state back to tube, I can claim with confidence that the majority of musicians worth their salt choose tube amps because they Sound Better. Period. Its that simple. They sound better. Any guitar player that would rather play through a lump of cold clay has never sat in front of an early seventies Marshall or Park with the dial on 11.

      I'll be obtaining a tube board as soon as I can.

    27. Re:who are they kidding? by Golantig · · Score: 2

      With regards to the violin emphasising even harmonics - it depends where the bow is playing on the string. If a string is bowed or plucked at an antinodal position, for a particular mode of vibration, then this mode will be accenuated e.g. bowing at the centre tends to accenuate the odd numbered modes (which relate to harmonics).

    28. Re:who are they kidding? by nolife · · Score: 2

      It's common knowledge amongst audiophiles that high quality audio can only be reproduced outside the electrically noisy environment inside a PC case

      Every time audio and computer are mentioned, you will always find a thread about computers making too much noise. Self proclaimed audiophiles will bitch about everything. I suggest that you try to make some music on the PC before jumping on the noisy bandwagon. I have made several hundred elctronica type audio files on my PC's over the years. I start with a midi file, record to wav and burn them as audio cd's. That's kind of the simple version, I do not make the original midi files but I usually spend 10 to 20 hours on a song tweaking the instuments, channel reverb, chorus and volumes etc... The only limiting quality factor is the initial instrument quality that you sound card has. Some of the best files I have were made with a generic $14 Yamaha chipset hardware wavetable card in combination with an old Soundscape Elite. The SB live is good also but I do not like the stock instrument definitions that come with the card.

      My home stereo consists of a recent Yahmaha reciever and a Yamaha M4 amp (old but good) for the subs. Driving roughly 10 year old Infinity's. The sound quality of my files is better then 99% of the cd's I have bought in the store and rival some of the DDD Telarc labeled discs like BachBusters and Beethoven Or Bustfor background noise, hiss, and dynamic range.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    29. Re:who are they kidding? by rknize · · Score: 1

      But REproduction is a different story. I've got preamps that are rated in parts-per-million distortion. I tweak all my tape decks for the flattest response possible, and work hard to get the best signal-to-noise ratio possible. That's because I like the final sound to be as faithful to the original as possible.

      That is all a matter of opinion. I believe the proper way to (re)produce sound is the method that sounds the best to YOU! Recordings dated from the early 80s and back tend to be mixed (when mastered) to produce a certain sound on the equipment that was available at the time. Therefore, to hear it as intended, perfect reproduction is NOT what you want. This is the same reason many of the earlier CDs made from old masters (used to cut LPs) sound so horrible. They were mixed to sound as intended after being replayed on the vinyl medium. This is why many LPs sound better than CDs. It's not that the LP medium is necessarily better, but rather that the master were not remixed for the sterile CD medium.

      Many triodes are far more linear than your typical BJT found in the opamps in your typical "hifi" equipment. I still haven't heard a FET circuit that I like. Manufacturers will never acknowledge this, as electron tube circuits are more expensive, need to be replaced periodically, and are inefficient in terms of power useage. Since they operate at high voltage and low current, transformers are required to match them to other modern equipment.

      As far as distortion goes, not all "tubes" can be lumped into a single catagory. The triodes used single-ended, as in the case of this MB, have the desired even harmonic distortion. However, you can do just as bad with odd harmonics as a BJT or FET with a pentode in push-pull. The human ear generates its own even harmonics, which is part of the reason why they are musically more tolerable than odd harmonics.

      Having friends and family in the recording industry, they can attest that having electron tubes at the mechanical-to-electrical interface can greatly improve the sound, since tubes overload softly. The signal coming off a microphone (or the load of driving a speaker) frequently goes FAR beyond its designed output level, most likely causing the annoying harshness heard in transistor amps. To put a triode preamp in a computer case is a little odd, but it may do some good cleaning up the annoying sound that comes from even the best DACs found on sound cards these days.

      Anyway, like I said, the right technology is the one that sounds the best to you. I grew up (no, I'm only 27) listening to all of my music through a tube amp. When I "upgraded" to supposedly higher-end equipment, I didn't realize what I was missing until many years later when I fired up those old firebottles in my old, mid-fi amp. I will never go back.

      Russ W. Knize

      --
      Russ W. Knize
    30. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part of this is that they use a switch mode power supply (as seen from picture) from the PC power rails (probably 12V) to the high voltage required by the tube. That got to be considered "bad" by the audiophile (TM) crowd.

      Wonder what they use for the filment supply ?

    31. Re:who are they kidding? by haggar · · Score: 2

      And here's why: Transistors and tubes use different principles of physics for operation. Valve amps (the original name for tube amplifiers) are basically voltage driven, so when they distort, even-order harmonics are produced (2nd, 4th, 6th, etc...) while transistor amps are current driven and produce odd-order harmonics (3rd, 5th, 7th, etc....)
      The fact that tranjo's are current driven while tubes are voltage driven is NOT the reason for the difference in distortion! The reason for it is, simply, in the difference of the transmission curve. The rest of what you said is OK, but it has no bearing whatsoever with the driving method of the device.

      --
      Sigged!
    32. Re:who are they kidding? by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      That's because I like the final sound to be as faithful to the original as possible.
      Maybe this is a silly question (about half of what you wrote is gibberish to me), but without actually having been in the studio and having heard the original recording, how do you know when your reproduction of a recording is faithful to the original? I mean, obviously we can assume that if you hear an A-flat on the record, the guitarist played an A-flat in the studio, but when it comes to subtle harmonics and exact timbre and whatnot, how do you know that you've got it right?
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    33. Re:who are they kidding? by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 2

      > The switching supplies usually found in PCs can produce a lot of noise which will find its way to the sound
      > card no matter how well it's shielded.

      First, better-quality power supplies are usually made of better components, and better sheilded from the start, producing a less dirty EM noise. I like Sparkle power supplies myself, though many others are as good or better.

      Second, I don't see the power supply as a big issue since my soundcard and headphone amp are sheilded--the soundcard with a little steel RF sheilding cut to fit around it and given a couple layers of nonconducting paint just in case it accidentally touches something, as well as a rubber "footer" at the bottom so that it can rest flush with the motherboard around the PCI slot. There's one hole (covered with mesh, anyway) in the RF sheilding on the side away from the power supply, with a duct leading to a fan mounted on the back of the case for venting so that the 24/96 soundcard can't overheat. The headphone amp is a Corda-type design built inside the drive-bay RF sheilding box from an old Creative 4224 CD burner that broke. The amp itself is in a small cardboard box wrapped in thin plastic, with a Faraday cage of metal mesh around that plastic, and another layer of thin plastic between the Faraday cage and the drive-bay box from the old broken CD burner. There's a hole in one part of the thin plastic layers (and through the cardboard, obviously) for an exhaust fan. It's fronted with a plastic drive-bay panel with holes for two headphone jacks (high-impedence and low-impedence) and the volume knob, and a vent hole for the small exhaust fan mounted on top of the front of the drive-bay panel. So, it's definitely better-sheilded from RF noise than almost any consumer amp.

      Since I listen with a pair of nice Beyerdynamic headphones, noise from fans and drives isn't an issue.

      The great thing is that anyone can do this on the cheap. Audiophile-quality headphones and headphone amps are very cheap compared to the money one would need to spend to get equivalent sound from speakers, especially since anyone with a willingness to learn to solder can build a great headphone amp for a very small price, and the plans are readily available from the two headphone sites I mentioned in my above post. The HRTFs in modern games and APIs even make headphones a good choice for gaming, too.

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    34. Re:who are they kidding? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      No, but most of the people who will blow more than 5000 on an amp are. I spent my cash on decent speakers, and a cheap amp and CD player and 14 gauge wire from wal-mart. I'm more than happy with the sound it all produces.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    35. Re:who are they kidding? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      I'd been looking for a new sig - thanks!

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    36. Re:who are they kidding? by plastik55 · · Score: 2

      Your sound card is powered, no?

      If your sound card is not powered then you can ignore your power supply as a source of noise. But if your sound card is powered, then it's got a direct electrical connection to your power supply through the PCI slot. The power lines lead directly out of the power supply and directly into your PCI connector.

      Ain't no amount of shielding going to help you, if there's noise on the power supply. Switching-mode supplies produce a godawful lot of noise.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    37. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not very funny. Just a hint.

    38. Re:who are they kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its funny.

      And edible.

      Mmmm, candy keyboards. I'll sit their skeltons right beside my candy watch and candy phone.

  7. Before everyone goes crazy... by saihung · · Score: 2

    making fun of this, please keep in mind that some of the best high-end amplifiers made today still use vaccuum tubes. Tubes are capable of making extremely high-quality sound, and whether this is because of their "warm sound" as enthusiasts claim or just because of sound degradation that sounds good to some people - well, that's just a matter of personal preference.

    That there are any options for high-quality on-board audio at all - this can only be a good thing.

    1. Re:Before everyone goes crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tube amps may provide good sound, but the keyword (as you wrote) as 'tubeS'. As in, more than one. I only see one tube in that pic of the motherboard on AOpen's site.

  8. Where did the ISA slots go... by rob-fu · · Score: 0

    will this obsolete/phase out ISA? What am I going to do w/my 3c509?

    1. Re:Where did the ISA slots go... by TydalForce · · Score: 1

      isa's been going away for a while... my mobo is a few months old and doesn't have isa.... and if you can't spare $20 to get a pci network card, then you prolly wanna look at a more affordable motherboard ;-}

    2. Re:Where did the ISA slots go... by TellarHK · · Score: 2

      I've got two boards that're probably designs a year or so old, and neither one of 'em has ISA on them. However, they all have AMR slots... Like that isn't going to be the next thing to go. Dumb idea in the first place.

    3. Re:Where did the ISA slots go... by SWTP · · Score: 1

      They need the room for a pair of 41000A RF power tubes for the wireless net connection!

      The tube fits but the filiment and the 2.5kv for the plate ate up the ISA slot.

  9. gonna wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A move in the right direction. I think I'm gonna wait for the version with a tesla coil on it tho.

    1. Re:gonna wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and an oscillation overthruster. "Where are we going?" "Planet 10!" "WHEN?" "REAL SOON!!"

    2. Re:gonna wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And one of those Jacobs Ladders that throws a spark up 2 thin rails.

  10. This is like.... by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Buying a new car that has automatic transmission, 60mpg, dashboard computer, GPS, and also an 8-track player. And by the way, vacuum tubes and AGP slots were never meant to be in the same picture. I'm sorry, but it just ain't right.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:This is like.... by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      no... to an audiophile this is like getting automatic transmission, 60mpg, dashboard computer, GPS, and a live band in your dash.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    2. Re:This is like.... by Indras · · Score: 2

      Dude, don't diss the 8-track players. My first car had one, the best damned anti-theft device I've ever seen. If you really don't want your car stolen, buy an old 8-track player and put it in, then throw some 8-tracks around on your passenger seat.

      You could leave the thing unlocked with all four windows rolled down in a dark alleyway in Chicago, and nobody would touch it.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    3. Re:This is like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "vacuum tubes and AGP slots were never meant to be in the same picture"

      *PICTURE* TUBE maybe???

      Vacuum tubes are your friend, ok?

    4. Re:This is like.... by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      This is like Buying a new car that has automatic transmission, 60mpg, dashboard computer, GPS, and also an 8-track player. And by the way, vacuum tubes and AGP slots were never meant to be in the same picture. I'm sorry, but it just ain't right.

      Also incompatible with motherboards, tube sockets are six prong or octal, not hex or binary.

      Coming soon - core memory cards (1,000,000 wait states).

    5. Re:This is like.... by hplasm · · Score: 1

      I did this. When I came back, the damn car was full of 8-track tapes...;->

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  11. Tu-be or not Tu-be by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1, Funny

    That is the question.

    1. Re:Tu-be or not Tu-be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. that sucked. go to hell, demon.

  12. What kind of tubes? by cporter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The important question is, what kind of tube is it? There's only one, judging by the picture. Is it an output tube? Another question: cooling. Tubes get damn hot.

    A lot of audiophile tubes are sourced from Russian or Chinese factories. It would suck to blow the tube playing GTA3 and have to wait 12 weeks for a shipment from the far east!

    1. Re:What kind of tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they don't get THAT hot. Yeah, the interior glows that nice orange color where lives the filament. The surface of the tube is hot to the touch. On the other hand, so is any of the voltage regulator devices on the Mobo. (Speaking as an electrical engineer, ex Navy Radar Repair type (1 MW tubes, anyone?) and puller of more 6AU6A's than I can count.)

    2. Re:What kind of tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tube(s) get hot...but one low power tube isn't going to be that hot...actually transistor's can run alot hotter than some tubes can.

      I used to have a tube amplifier so I know what kind of temps they can get up to. 12ax7's are a low temp tiube which can be considered a low heat tube.
      I also like Aopen's doctor voice II (speech error messages)

    3. Re:What kind of tubes? by djdead · · Score: 1

      it's probably a 12ax7

      this is a super common pre amp tube used in a lot of 'hybrid' (tube preamp and solid state poweramp) music gear. they're also really cheap.

      --
      -1: flamebait should really be -1: inciteful
    4. Re:What kind of tubes? by Sleeper · · Score: 1

      Russian factory "Svetlana" was bought by american company. They actually have a website (www.svetlana.com). So I guess that wouldn't be a problem.

      Overall it is strange idea.
      Yes distortions make sound better (for guitar amp) but just to amplify transistors would be better because tubes have
      1)smaller dynamic range.
      2)more noise
      3)higher nonlinearity (althouth as it has been pointed out many times above it is better for guitar amps).
      4)heat (has been mentioned before).

      Besides, your regular vanila PCB is a bad "carier" for tubes. Good high end guitar amps are still built like in old days on a metal frame which also allows you to properly put a filament line (if you have several tubes).

      Making a good tube amp was and still is an art as much as scince. So high end (real) stuff is till made by manual labor. So try to massproduce this would be silly (people already tryed that and failed).

      But whatever. If the presence of tube will make some guy think that he/she is getting "better" sound let them have it. Perception is a wierd thing.

      --
      - Back off man. I am a scientist
    5. Re:What kind of tubes? by Sleeper · · Score: 1

      the main link www.svetlana.com does not show anything at the moment But you can still go to http://www.svetlana.com/docs/tubeworks.html and read about tubes how they work and where and why they are still used.

      --
      - Back off man. I am a scientist
    6. Re:What kind of tubes? by OzTech · · Score: 1

      It looks like Sovtek 6922 dual-triode tube, which will provide a 2 channel stereo output. This tube is quite common and can be sourced in the States from almost anywhere at about US$8-

    7. Re:What kind of tubes? by AJWM · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the pictures on harcop, it looks like a Russian-made Sovtek 6922 (aka E88CC aka 6DJ8). Here's the specs on a 6DJ8. Basically a dual triode like the 12AX7 but somewhat different characteristics.

      --
      -- Alastair
    8. Re:What kind of tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A close up image is here:
      http://www.hardocp.com/images/articles/1023 141382a QT8zHyDcL_1_14_l.jpg

    9. Re:What kind of tubes? by pz · · Score: 1

      Another question: cooling. Tubes get damn hot.

      Unlike silicon devices which work better when cold (especially CMOS) and are destroyed by excessive heat, tubes need to be hot to operate. While they do run hot, they do not dissipate that much heat: a 12AX7 (a common dual triode which is a good guess for the device in the photos) dissipates 3W max (filament plus max plate), a far cry from the 30W-plus a modern processor dissipates. Further, since the tubes need to be hot, the strong airflow typically found in contemporary cases is detrimental to proper operation. A cold tube just does not work.

      My two cents: this is a gimmick.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    10. Re:What kind of tubes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My two cents: This finally justifies those case window mod kits.

  13. audiophiles rejoice! by Moosifer · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a once snobbish, now reformed ex-audiophile, I cannot resist but slip back to the affected, bombastic days of my youth and exclaim "It's about freakin' time! Now when are we going to replace these markedly inferior CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs with the gloriously mellifluous LP-ROM?"

    1. Re:audiophiles rejoice! by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 2

      Dude, I was thinking the exact same thing! Check out my post. Now will it be USB 2.0 or 1394 connected...

      DL

    2. Re:audiophiles rejoice! by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Fuck LP-ROM. Let's replace DVD-Video with Vinyl Video!

    3. Re:audiophiles rejoice! by dublin · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "It's about freakin' time! Now when are we going to replace these markedly inferior CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs with the gloriously mellifluous LP-ROM?"

      Actually, it's already been done. In my garage, I have a copy of Interface Age Magazine, one of the early PC mags (back when PC meant IMSAI 8080 or Altair or SWTPC 6800 boxes with S-100 buses, or if you were really flush with cash, the incredibly slick boxes from The Digital Group or CompuColor!)

      This issue includes one of those LPs pressed on thin vinyl that were sometimes bound into magazines in the '70s. The interesting thing about this one (which they billed as the first "floppy ROM") is that instead of musical audio, it contained a BASIC interpreter (I think, I really don't remember what he program was, since I had no computer myself, I just read and dreamed) encoded on the disk in "Standard" Kansas City format - the same way data was commonly encoded on cassette tapes at the time. (Those of you that have never loaded a program from cassette have no concept of "slow" - I want no more griping about kernel build times on your 2 GHz P4s and Athlons!)

      Therefore, you could just hook your turntable and stereo (line level out) up to the cassette interface on your computer, and voila!, you had a BASIC interpreter, dumped directly into your computer from a magazine delivered via regular mail.

      This is so cool that it's one of the few magazines I kept from that era - I wish I had hung on to more, as the hacking was really far more adventurous back then than it is now... It's amazing how we're just now getting back to doing the things they were doing back then, things like voice recognition and such, which hasn't really improved all that much (perhaps 10-20x) despite CPU hardware that's 100,000 times faster.

      Makes you wonder where we'd be if the vibrant CP/M hacker community that was dominant prior to the IBM PC had been able to somehow survive and continue to grow.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    4. Re:audiophiles rejoice! by hawk · · Score: 2
      yes, they were much more interesting then, and you could build something from scratch that would keep up with anything commercial. And clever design still counted for a lot . . .


      Anyway, it goes back farther than that. Somewhere in my stuff is an entire LP full of morse code at various speeds for learing it . . . something I never got around to doing, and don't have time for now . . .


      hawk

  14. Don't see how it's possible.... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There aren't enough components on the board (that I can see) unless there is an external power supply.

    Most tubes are going to require abot 16,000 volts to the grid. You'll need a nice-sized transformer to step up normal line current to that. And if it's powered off the MB power harness.....well, I son't think that's even possible. What's the highest voltage there? 12v? That trnasformer would have to be huge.

    And all of that isn't even taking in to account the heat problems.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    1. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by jhines · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, that is for a CRT, standard audio tubes work on a few hundred volts.

      And it is the plate of a tube that gets the B+ high voltage, the grid regulates the current flow, and uses a modest voltage.

      A tube amplfier has 3 power supples:
      A- to power the filaments (6 or 12v AC)
      B- Hi voltage DC, in the 300 volt range
      C- Low voltage DC, to power the grid circuits

    2. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by TellarHK · · Score: 1

      Damn it's nice to see Commodore text these days. Brings me back yo the old days. Sigh. :) Now if only my Amiga 1000 was as cool as a C64.

      I never should have sold my C-128D.

    3. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by hifizen · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Most tubes are going to require abot 16,000 volts to the grid."

      um... try 160V, at about 5-10mA for your typical preamp tube. Then about 6 or 12V for the filament. Piece of cake for a switched power supply...

      The small tubes will contribute some heat, but we're not talking power output tubes, so the extra heat generation should be minimal - well within a PCs cooling limits.

      Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    4. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Didn't know that about audio tubes. I only know about RF amps, and assumed it was the same...and went brain dead on the grid/plate thing.

      So I still don't see 300 volts comming off of that board....do you?

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    5. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by xercist · · Score: 2

      What's the highest voltage there? 12v?

      Actually ATX supplies both +12 and -12, so the highest voltage is 24V. Not saying it would make a difference, but...

      --

      --
      grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
    6. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      >Most tubes are going to require abot 16,000 volts to the grid

      Wrong, that is the voltage enough for arcing
      and kill most living creature nearby.
      In addition, it is the plate(anode)
      needs high voltage(Preamp tubes 80-250V,
      output tubes 200~500V). Grid always needed low voltage(2V ~100V inmost case). Anything needs
      more than six thousand volts will be as large
      as a street lamp, and rated to few hundred Watts.

    7. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Nah - powering tubes with 12 volts dc is pretty simple.

      In the laser club we used to build power supplies to do this all the time. Convert the DC to AC, then have a few (small - maybe 1" by 1")transformers to step up the voltage to 10,000 or 25,000 volts. One thing to remember - to power a tube you don't need a lot of amps. I think the biggest problem was keeping the heat down on the voltage regulator.

    8. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      From the article:
      By incorporating a switching mode power supply for the tube circuitry that can truly rival solid-state amplifiers, then employing A Maxim 668 DC-DC voltage converter to provide ample voltage for the tube to function under optimal conditions

      ....with minimum 50,000 MTBF hours on the motherboard, and 35,000 MTBF hours on the tube circuitry (Tube itself will have about 4,000 to 5,000 hours, depends on operating conditions...

      If I got only 5000 hours of driving in my car before it went *(poof)*, I wouldn't buy it. I don't care if they gave me a traditional Geshia for 5000 hours, the MoBo isn't worth it.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    9. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by darkwiz · · Score: 2

      You apparently aren't an EE. There are a number of ways to do voltage multiplication without a (large) transformer (technically, you can do it without the XMFR, it just helps).

      Here is one way. I'm too lazy to try to find a better link with some theory attached, but if you follow the current path on the voltage swings, you should be able to figure it out.

    10. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, guy. Typical dinky tubes like that need 6.3 or 12.6 V (DC or AC) to the filament, some -10 or so to the grid, maybe 70-120 VDC on the plate, and 10 V or less than the plate voltage to the screen. Easy to make with random step-up dc-dc converters, especially since everything except the filament supply uses relatively low amounts of current. (Trannies run at low voltage, high current; tubes run at high voltage, low current). There are tubes around, kinda specialized, that only need 10-20 VDC on the plate, but that dinky one in the photo's not one of them. That's why the transformer: Takes an output impedance of 100 Ohms or greater and transforms it down to the 8 or 16 Ohms the speakers or what all need. You can capacitively couple them, but transformers work better.

    11. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Shelled · · Score: 2

      Not necessary. Tubes will run at relatively low voltages. The entire early history of radio was powered by low voltage batteries. It's why the power supply voltage came to be know as B+. Decades of car radios ran on tubes.

    12. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      16,000 volts? On the grid? Score:5, Informative?

      Kill me now.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    13. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      If I got only 5000 hours of driving in my car before it went *(poof)* ...

      ...then I would say you probably bought a car made by Verizon...

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    14. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by norton_I · · Score: 2

      I assume you don't buy lightbulbs, then? And it is shameful that you have to refill your gas tank every few hundred miles.

      I am pretty sure this is a joke some engineer at AOpen wanted to have at the expense of the particularly dumb crop of audiophile wannabes who think they can be leet by having a tube amp hooked up to their AC97 audio codec.

      But tubes burn out, and have to be replaced.

    15. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by vagn · · Score: 1

      > There aren't enough components on the board (that I can see) unless
      > there is an external power supply.

      Voltage stepup circuits are easy to make and don't take a lot of space.

      > Most tubes are going to require abot 16,000 volts to the grid.

      200 to 400 volts should be enough. Its audio, not a CRT, image
      intensifier, or X-ray machine.

      > You'll need a nice-sized transformer to step up normal line current
      > to that.

      Or a small transformer and a high freq. oscillator.

      > And if it's powered off the MB power harness.....well, I son't think
      > that's even possible. What's the highest voltage there? 12v?
      > That trnasformer would have to be huge.

      12 volts is plenty. Use a small transformer and a high freq. osc.

      > And all of that isn't even taking in to account the heat problems.

      There is already a fan in the box, so getting rid of the heat isn't
      a big problem. If they were clever they would put a little insulation
      and shielding around the the tube, and under-drive the filament.
      Same temperature cathode, less heat to dissipate.

      There are very small op amps available now. Were AOpen really insane
      they could run low voltage differential audio to a small op amp adjacent
      to the grid pin of the tube. Take some care with the traces and that
      answers the objection concerning noise coupling to the tube input driver.

      All in all it is an interesting idea. I wonder what it sounds like.
      I wonder how long before some hacks it to tweak the plate voltage ;-).

    16. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by ortholattice · · Score: 2
      Most tubes are going to require abot 16,000 volts to the grid. You'll need a nice-sized transformer to step up normal line current to that.

      I think others have already mentioned that most tubes require 100-300 volts on B+ for the plate. And -3v or so is typical for a control grid (although B+ is usually applied to the screen grid, which does not control the signal but has a different purpose). In the 1950's car radios had tubes that used 12 volts for B+.

      BTW the only power source mentioned on the data sheet is a 3v lithium battery. (I am tempted to joke that they neglected to mention that it was the size of a refrigerator and required 2-inch copper bus bars. Oops, I just did. Yeah, I know it's for the CMOS clock chip.)

    17. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Darby · · Score: 1

      Damn it's nice to see Commodore text these days. Brings me back yo the old days. Sigh. :)
      OK then... where did I get my sig ;-)

    18. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by ninewands · · Score: 2

      The "B" for the plate voltage supply was the source of the name of the B "cell" battery, which produced 120 vdc. Sorry, in my book that's NOT low voltage because I've taken some pretty nasty shocks from a 12 volt battery in a car on a hot (sweaty) day.

      Having read some of the other posts in this topic, I think this is a joke by the engineers at Aopen. I saw a reference to a 300 volt plate voltage in the writeup on their website. That sounds kind of high for a dual-section triode in a "miniature" envelope. 120-150 volts would be more reasonable, but it's STILL more voltage than I'd want on the same board as a $200 (or more) 1 GHz microprocessor.

    19. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZXKUQYB!

      (I'll bet that doesn't make it past the lameness filter)

    20. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get this... The only way there would be any benefit from having a tube on the motherboard would be if thats what is amplifying the speakers. Therefore, you'd have to use passive non powered speakers to gain any benefits. I don't think there are any high end computer speaker systems out there that aren't powered, and as soon as you use one that is, its own amplifier, which would typically be solid state would kick in. I guess its more of a sound effect than an actual audiophile device.

      What would an audiophile do? Probably get the cleanest digital signal running outside of his pc then amplify that with the highest quality amplifier, whether tube or solid state. Otherwise, you would only be able to run headphones of that thing.

    21. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2

      These days you can fit the necessary DC to DC stepup converter inside a package the size of a match box.

      Hamamatsu makes several Photo Multiplier and Photon Counting Tubes that run off of 5v and internally generate up to 1500 volts. The voltage is clean enough to run a photo counter. The step up converter is small enough to be hidden in the tubes socket... That's what Hamamatsu does.

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
    22. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by User+956 · · Score: 1

      I only know about RF amps, and assumed it was the same...and went brain dead on the grid/plate thing.

      I wouldn't expect the typical /. reader to know that. Your response is what I would expect.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    23. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Darby · · Score: 1

      ZXKUQYB!

      (I'll bet that doesn't make it past the lameness filter)


      Heh, it did and right you are ;-)
      Probably no more clear to the uninitiated though ;-)

    24. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Yes. Compact Flourescent. 50,000 hours lifetime. I do have to fill the tank, but I don't have to replace the motor every few hundred miles ethier.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    25. Re:Don't see how it's possible.... by hplasm · · Score: 1

      16,000 volts to the grid??? The national distribution grid perhaps..Besides, tube grids run at a negative potential, maybe -3v. The Anode might run at 16,000 volts, but only if your speakers can handle a Megawatt or so.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  15. looks like a hoax... by djtack · · Score: 2, Informative

    Neat photo, but a couple of problems:

    Chrisd's right on about the power supply, valves have pretty demanding power requirements, and the voltage is much higher (300+ volts is typical) than what's normally present in a PC.

    Also, most tube amps require output transformers, which is noticably absent from the photo.

    Thirdly, there's only one tube! Presumably, if they are really after the audiophile market, it would at least be a stereo amplifier. Not to say anything about the noise problems present near high speed digital circuits. This is bunk.

    1. Re:looks like a hoax... by hifizen · · Score: 1
      The little tubes are sometimes double valves - that is, there's actually two devices inside one glass envelope. At this scale, even 300V is too high. Typical small signal tubes will operate somewhere around 150V at low currents. As for an output transformer, they are typically used in the big power output stages. A small signal stage like this can be capacitor coupled or even DC-coupled (with some additional servo circuitry) without trouble.

      It may not be a hoax, but it certainly looks like a cheap gimmick.

      Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    2. Re:looks like a hoax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most tube amps require output transformers,"

      Only if they're driving a low impedance load, this would be line level.

    3. Re:looks like a hoax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um,

      1) Switching up an ATX supply rail to useable B+ can be done in about a sqaure inch or two of board space.

      2) Many preamp designs aren't transformer coupled to the load. Power amps, yes.

      3) Most preamp-grade tubes are dual. 12AX7, which is the most ubiquitous, is one of them.

      Doesn't change the fact that this is a pretty lame way to amplify compressed mp3 artifacts. Yuck.

    4. Re:looks like a hoax... by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
      This gets score: 3, Informative?

      Even a mid-power tube uses no more than a couple amps of heater current (usually 6.3V if I remember the standard correctly), which is about maybe 12 Watts. Your CPU uses more like 70 Watts. A little wussy general-purpose small-signal tube will only use a couple-hundred milliamps, so the whole thing would use just a Watt or two. No big deal for heat either (the wattage directly determines heat).

      I'll be the first to say that the absense of a voltage high enough to do the job is no problem, check my webpage for an example of a circuit that needed +12V on a board that was only supplied at +5V (under the PIC stuff). I even extended it later so it supplied -10 or so for an RS232 interface.

      A small tube will need 70 to 100V or so, which is not that difficult with a standard diode-cap cascade voltage multiplier. The whole circuit would completely lack transformers and probably fit in a space a centimeter on a side.

      The noise issues are NOT from the digital circuits, although I am a little surprised not to see a metal box around the tube. Microphonics from the moving parts in the computer and AF interference from the motors would be a problem.

      I agree with the people who call it a cheap gimmick, since the tube is almost certainly just a processing stage before feeding a standard solid-state power amp, but calling it a hoax outright... That I'm not so sure about.

    5. Re:looks like a hoax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get twin tubes...

      Motherboard sound sucks. This just sinks to a lower level.

      On the other hand, where are the extra tubes for 5.1 sound ? ;) (Audiophiles don't believe in 5.1)

  16. No market, technically undesirable... by Sontas · · Score: 1

    This can not be for real. Tubes tend to draw considerably more current than a darlington pair. They generate much more heat. In a PC case I would think that they would be far more susceptible to RF interference, as well. Not to mention, what would be the possible upside to doing this. There is next to no market for tube amps even in the Hi-fi market. Anything that has then cost a ton of money compared to solid state amps. This just seems really far fetched. Technical issues aside, there must be zero market demand for this. No audiophile would want this and it would appear that would be their only market for this.

    1. Re:No market, technically undesirable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez. What is WITH people? I have an old Admiral AM/FM 5-tube All American table radio downstairs. Got it when I was a kid in the 60's, and it still works just fine. No, the electrical system power generator does not come down the wires when it gets turned on. I think it might draw 50-60 watts. A similiar trannie radio could be built with the same number of transistors as tubes, and that would be around 5-10 watts, most in the final amp. The real power savings in tubes vs. trannies isn't in the signal side, it's heating up the filaments.
      On the other hand, if you need REAL power, the only stuff rugged enough for it tends to be tubes. Million watt transmitters anyone? The spare heat that gets into a tube simply gets it hot. So long as it's not hot enough to melt the metal they do quite well. Trannies, on the other hand, don't do well when the junction gets above 125 C; semiconductors turn into straight conductors about there and that's all she wrote. (i.e., a lot of current and a puddle of melted silicon). Yeah, and I remember those 6146A's glowing a nice dull red color when running RTTY. Boy, this stuff brings back memories!

  17. More interesting reading... by Incongruity · · Score: 3, Informative
    ArsTechnica ran a bit about this recently and they have some interesting discussion over there as well.

    You can also check out a IEEE story they link to about vacuum tubes and their uses in modern audio.

  18. New disk drive also in development for this board. by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    It uses physical forms actually cut into a vinyl disk to reproduce sound. Rather than a traditional 5 1/4 disk bay it will be a USB 2.0 periperal and look something like these devices. Analog audiophiles rejoice! I play guitar and I do have to say I enjoy the sound of a classic tube amp. I wonder how odd and expensive will it be to say... Uh yeah I need a vacuum tube replacement for my computer.

    Still, could be interesting for your HTPC

  19. its a waste! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think this could be a really cool move for people who want really high-fi/audiophile sound,
    BUT useing the ac 97 codec??? i have never heard very good sound out of one of them, and i have always found it to be just that codec, if they would do it with a good audio chip, it would be much better.
    just my thoughts...

  20. You can check out the product page by anti11es · · Score: 1

    Here is what the board looks like. It is not yet ./'ed so look quick. =)

  21. Umm.... looks like a wannabe IT7 or AT7? by Hollinger · · Score: 2

    Does this look like a johnny-come-lately AT7 or IT7? While the Abit offering looks like a smash hit (according to some review sites that I refuse to promote), this looks like it's a niche market at best. How many of these do they hope to sell? I understand that there are people who've spent more than the price of a cheap BMW on their stereos, but why, oh why, would they buy this for their computer? Can you get a DAT player for computers these days?

  22. Re:Ahhh... by edrugtrader · · Score: 3, Funny

    [Timeout expired]

    uh... so it the odbc connection timed out, or the time it allows to timeout expired?

    i think [ODBC fuckup] explains it much better.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  23. What exactly will this tube be doing? by handsomepete · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm honestly asking. Would a single tube of that size after digital processing really have a major effect on sound quality? I thought the neat thing about tubes were the warmth and natural distortion they provide (in the same way as analog recording). If it has already gone through digital processing with the inherently less forgiving limits and peaks, wouldn't that actually hurt the quality? And what's the deal with that power input near the tube?

    This whole thing seems kinda skimpy on details... I hope this doesn't give Creative any ideas. The last thing we need is a PCI SB Live card with this stuff on it:
    This quality Creative Sound Blaster(tm) product requires the space of four PCI slots and a special attachment for your power supply.

    1. Re:What exactly will this tube be doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Amplifier uses 12AX7 tubes, which are a little smaller than my thumb. Granted, it uses 7 of them, but the sound quality is great. However, there are so many great ways to add tube "warmth" after the signal leaves the case.

      Basically, you will never get a pure analog signal, so there's no real point. Anything you play will be digital ( games, MP3, etc. ), so you might as well use a standard audio cable out to a tube pre-amp or tube amplifier. I'm getting a tube pre-amp for my system, but I'm using a G4 PowerMac with ProTools audio software, where the sound quality really matters.

    2. Re:What exactly will this tube be doing? by SWTP · · Score: 1

      I would liie to see the guys that cooked up this thing when they presented the idea!

      Can just see ebay now. Tube testes are goign to sell like hotcakes! And RS will need to find all of those old stand up tube testes.

      Hum... Wonder if it is a Russan made tube. The US droped most of those decades ago.

    3. Re:What exactly will this tube be doing? by isaac · · Score: 2
      And what's the deal with that power input near the tube?

      That's no power input - it's the audio output header. See this HardOCP article (towards the bottom of the page) for a few more details.

      I still think it's a gimmick, though. Really, the D/A should be external in its own shielded enclosure for optimum results.

      Another gimmick of this board is that it includes a CD player application that you can boot into instead of Windows. Interesting, I guess.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    4. Re:What exactly will this tube be doing? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      My CD-ROM drive has a 'CD Player application you can boot into instead of Windows' too. It's that second 'play' button on the face of the drive. Hell, you don't even have to plug the power supply into the motherboard to use it!

    5. Re:What exactly will this tube be doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, so has your typical CD prior to being amplified (or pre-amplified) by your standard tube amp. I dunno if this motherboard is worth a damn, or if it's even real, but as a dyed in the wool audiophile, I think it's kinda cool that someone's making an effort... especially in these times of people claiming that lossy compression (mp3s) can reproduce the same sound as a CD, or as some claim produce BETTER sound than an analog LP... uh, hello??? you're own damn ear hears in analog, and you're telling me lossy digital compression sounds better to it??? right.

      flame bait, I know, but I felt like going on a tangent.

  24. Oh sure, and next thing you know. . . by kfg · · Score: 1, Troll

    Macintosh will be a computer.

    KFG

    1. Re:Oh sure, and next thing you know. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that +1 is sure useful, what a great fucking post!!!

    2. Re:Oh sure, and next thing you know. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er,

      Macintosh -> Computer
      McIntosh -> high-end HiFi Equipment

  25. Why your dad says that... by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tubes tend to produce even-order harmonics when they distort. Transistors (except MOSFETS -- others?) produce odd-order harmonics. Of the two, odd-order harmonics are much more annoying from a psycho-acoustic standpoint and lead to what many describe as a "harsh" sound. Tubes also have the advantage of not clipping hard (producing a DC output) because they have to run through transformers to drive speakers and, as we all know, transformers don't pass DC.

    That's a gross oversimplification that leaves out much that I know, some that I think I know but don't really, and stuff other people actually know that I don't know at all. But that's the gist of it.

    Is it of any use on a motherboard? Sure. It's great gimmick to sell to idiots. So how do they get stereo out of a single tube? It looks too small to be the two-tubes-in-one variety.

    1. Re:Why your dad says that... by Shelled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dual tubes aren't rare, and they are usually small (proper term: receiving tubes, probably from the original use in radios.)

    2. Re:Why your dad says that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up 12AX7. You'll find that it is a dual valve preamp tube.

    3. Re:Why your dad says that... by Una · · Score: 1, Informative

      So how do they get stereo out of a single tube?

      Well, Most likely it would be a Dual Triode tube such as a 12AX7.
      Dual Triode tubes are basically 2 tubes in one envelope.

      From the looks of the photo, It uses a 9pin octal socket, which means the tube is easily replacable to your favorate, and also, most 9pin tubes just happen to be dual triodes. Hint Hint.

      While it may not be standard practice to use a single tube for stereo operation, its easily accoplished with non-balanaced audio.

      -Una

    4. Re:Why your dad says that... by Tiroth · · Score: 3, Informative


      Two notes:

      1) many line level tube circuits do not pass through trannies. There are many reasons tube circuits do not clip "hard", but the most common one is that tubes are low gain devices, operated with low (or no) negative feedback. It is NFB that "squares up" the clipping, producing the high order (nasty) harmonics.

      2) I couldn't get to the site, but the most common tubes are dual triodes, which is quite sufficient for a stereo buffer.

    5. Re:Why your dad says that... by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Is it of any use on a motherboard? Sure. It's great gimmick to sell to idiots. So how do they get stereo out of a single tube? It looks too small to be the two-tubes-in-one variety.

      It's probably a dual triode...a 12AX7 or something similar. 2 sections of 3 pins each (cathode, grid, plate) plus three for the heater (center-tapped so you can run it on 6V or 12V) makes 9 pins total, which was fairly common.

      (I looked for clues that this might've been an April Fool's joke, but didn't see anything to say that was the case.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Why your dad says that... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Tubes tend to produce even-order harmonics when they distort. Transistors (except MOSFETS -- others?) produce odd-order harmonics

      So use twice as many transistors to get even-order harmonics.

      C'mon, people, I thought you knew math.

    7. Re:Why your dad says that... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      So how do they get stereo out of a single tube?

      It's just the beginning. By the anti-Moore's Law, in ten years, computers will be the size of a refrigerator, and ten years later, the size of a house.

    8. Re:Why your dad says that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, Its a Dual-Triode... 2 gain stages which can be used seperately, or cascaded for more gain.
      The 6922 used on this motherboard is a Medium Mu (gain) Twin Triode. The common 12ax7 is a high mu twin triode

      http://hereford.ampr.org/cgi-bin/tube?tube=6922

    9. Re:Why your dad says that... by andyr · · Score: 2
      So how do they get stereo out of a single tube? It looks too small to be the two-tubes-in-one variety.

      It seems the tube is a Sovtek 6922 - which this page references as followed by one Sovtek 6922 double triode per channel.

      Cheers, Andy!

      --
      Andy Rabagliati
    10. Re:Why your dad says that... by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      So how do they get stereo out of a single tube? It looks too small to be the two-tubes-in-one variety.

      It's a dual triode.
      Here's the specs on the tube here. Looks like it's good for 3W per channel.

      What do you mean "too small to be the two-tubes-in-one variety?" I've seen dual triode pencil tubes that were a lot smaller.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    11. Re:Why your dad says that... by LightJockey · · Score: 1

      I beleive your assumptions are correct... looks remarkably like the 12AX7s I have in my Tubeworks guitar preamp. But one thing I love about tubes is that different tubes from different manufacturers have a slightly different "sound" (i.e. Different operating characteristics) so I wonder if they've socketed the tube, or hardwired it... hopefully they've got it in a nice ceramic socket to isolate it from the board.

      I wonder if we can change out the stock tube (if it is a 12AX7) to maybe.. an old coke bottle sylvania or a squeeky clean russion SovTek tube :)

      --
      Mouse, Mice. Goose, Geese. Moose... Moose?
    12. Re:Why your dad says that... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected regarding the dual-triodes. It's been a long time since I dabbled with tubes and was thinking of power output tubes rather than line-level stuff.

      The comment about not having a transformer is well-taken and was one of my reasons for being so critical. One of the selling points of "tube" sound is the soft clipping from the output transformer. On a transformerless design, you obviously lose those advantages.

    13. Re:Why your dad says that... by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I wonder if we can change out the stock tube (if it is a 12AX7) to maybe.. an old coke bottle sylvania or a squeeky clean russion SovTek tube :)

      The pix at HardOCP include some closeups of the firebottle...turns out it's a Sovtek 6922, an industrial-grade equivalent of the 6DJ8 twin triode (the European equivalent is ECC88). Here's a page about the 6922 and friends from what sounds like an audiophoole perspective. (The historical info is interesting, though.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:Why your dad says that... by robhancock · · Score: 1

      The HardOCP pictures had some closeups of the tube, it appeared to be a Sovtek tube..

  26. For embedded market? by Xunker · · Score: 2

    One thing I noticed is that it has a watchdog timer -- that leads me to think they are posing it for the embedded market; specifically for those who want to integrate it as part of a high-end audio gear setup that requires minimal user interaction.

    As an aside, don't tubes kick out a lot of heat? Any bets as to when we're going to see a Thermaltake Golden Orb for tubes? :)

    --
    Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
    1. Re:For embedded market? by GoRK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude, probably about 50% of all new desktop/server/etc. computers have a watchdog timer in them these days. Every new Intel chipset has one including the 845E that this motherboard uses. Some of VIA's chipsets have one. It's really hardly any work at all to put a watchdog into a chipset.

      This board is about as useful to the embedded market as a 440hp straight-8 engine would be to a compact car manufacturer.

    2. Re:For embedded market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This board is about as useful to the embedded market as a 440hp straight-8 engine would be to a compact car manufacturer."

      But man, wouldn't you want one? ;-)

      I've seen small block v8s in Ford Escorts, (old) mazda 121, etc. So that doesn't mean that it is useless. Just niche.

    3. Re:For embedded market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called an AC Cobra and it is pretty good at kicking butt.

  27. Crack Smokin' by sfgoth · · Score: 2

    Why do companies cater to these Audiophile nutcases? Stuff like monster cable, tube amps, and 20 lb power strips. What a waste of money...

    Oh wait. Money. THAT's why companies cater to those nuts. I wonder how much extra this mobo will cost, and if they'll send out Jeves with while gloves and a new tube (for a sizable fee) when yours burns out.

    -pmb

    1. Re:Crack Smokin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree. Cable quality is VERY important in high end audio applications, ironically, because tube amplifiers will magnify the line noise of off-quality cables to unlistenable levels. I haven't had to use my noise gate since I replaced all of my cable with Monster guitar cable ( Jazz type )

    2. Re:Crack Smokin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would there be a monster cable for the power supply as well as the IDE and SPIF ?

    3. Re:Crack Smokin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      monster cable? MONSTER CABLE? a true audiophile would never use that shit. seriously. if you think monster is high end, you need to get out more!

  28. Well... by cirby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Compared to a high-end Pentium IV, a vacuum tube probably counts as a heat sink...

  29. Does the board include a socket for... by Snard · · Score: 2

    ... the Signetics 9046xN Write Only Memory? (which, as you recall, has V(pp) pins for the filaments)

    --
    - Mike
    1. Re:Does the board include a socket for... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I just want to know where I plug in my Light Emitting EPROM.

      (yes, I've done Light Emitting EPROMS a few times. Plug them into the breadboard socket backwards and bright light comes out of the quartz window for a little while)

  30. Only one tube? by ktakki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I see only one tube and, considering the specs mention 5.1 surround sound, I can't see how this tube could be part of the pre-amp/power amp signal chain. I've owned a few tube amps in my time (stereo, guitar, and bass) and usually there's a couple of 12AX7s in the pre-amp stage and a few 6L6s or EL-34s in the power amp stage per channel. This is one small tube for six channels.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:Only one tube? by blair1q · · Score: 5, Informative


      It's lower down on the page.

      The tube is a dual triode, basically two tubes in the same package. It's got one or two cathodes, likely a common heater filament, two grids and two plates. The input signals go to the grids and the output signals are taken from the plates. Common cathodes would be fine, they'd both be connected to the same supply anyway. A common filament is an advantage, because it ensures the cathode(s) get the same heat, since thermodynamics plays a significant role in tube operation.

      Answer your question?

      --Blair
      "Reading is fundamental."

    2. Re:Only one tube? by gsa700 · · Score: 1

      I see only one tube and, considering the specs mention 5.1 surround sound, I can't see how this tube could be part of the pre-amp/power amp signal chain.

      Unless they are sending the digital bitstream through the tube before decoding ;-)

      --
      "You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
    3. Re:Only one tube? by Maxwell_E · · Score: 1

      No fear, it's just the heating element to keep the CPU warm which as we all know, a warm CPU decodes MP3s much more, uh... Warmly.

    4. Re:Only one tube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, to "warm up" the bits!

    5. Re:Only one tube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 tubes.. 6 channels..
      eh?

    6. Re:Only one tube? by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      I'd guess that it's got SP/DIF 5.1 output intended for use separate from the tube-amplified stereo output.

    7. Re:Only one tube? by blair1q · · Score: 2

      2 tubes, main stereo signal.

      4-8 channel sound is a combination of the two main channels and some mixing and layering. The two front main speakers still carry most of the sound, minus some of the center channel sound. The rear speakers and subwoofer carry only a small portion of the sound, and don't need to have the same tonal quality as main sound.

      Multimedia and movie sound are far too fake, processed, and noisy for anyone to care.

      So you're not going to use pure stereo for anything other than audiophile music.

      The fact that this tube circuit is also there for movies is just a bonus point.

      One last thing: THX is a measure of minimal quality, albeit a necessary one in a world in which minimizing quality cuts costs and improves profits. They've already defined THX-Ultra to create a standard for low-to-moderate-but-loud quality. Expect THX-hyperultrasooperdooper before you see real audiophile quality, but again, the compressed, cut-up, foleyed, looped sound they put on movies (especially the shrieking, groaning, grinding crap Lucas considers sound) will waste the value of that kind of equipment.

      --Blair

  31. Segmentation Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Core Dumped

    ...wait! Mod me down because I'm anti-Linux! Thanks for your fairness, moderators.

  32. Analog Computing? by lostchicken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was really hoping for this to be for analog computing.

    In the field of chaos theory, and cryptography, and countless others, analog computing is great. To have an analog accelerator, much as one has a 3D accelerator, or floating point module, would be great. The tubes could be rewired on the fly, like an FPGA, allowing the programmer do all kinds of things. Imagine if the programmer could work in voltages, with chaotic effects giving true random numbers. Using this chaotic data, you could form clouds and other random events for games, perform neural network calculations and countless other things.

    The analog systems helping the digital ones would be quite a revolution.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:Analog Computing? by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Uhm, dude, grab yourself a geiger counter and a lantern mantle and read this site: http://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbits/

    2. Re:Analog Computing? by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      You don't need a full-blown analog computer just to generate true random numbers. The Intel i8xx chipsets include a random number generator. From the firmware hub datasheet:
      The Firmware Hub integrates a Random Number Generator (RNG) using thermal noise generated from inherently random quantum mechanical properties of silicon.
      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

  33. Re:You can check out the product page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^
    |
    Karma Whore

  34. Your PC is not a '59 Fender Bassman. by tarvo · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a muso who has always used Tube based amps for that rich warm tone that you can only get when those 6L6's and EL84's are glowing a nice red colour I know why you would want to do this as an audiophile. I just don't think it's very smart.

    Here's why;

    Heat - I never rest my beer on top of my amp, not because I'm afraid it will spill. I just don't like warm beer. Half-way through the first set and the top of my Bassman is warm enough to send my beer cool in a few minutes. And that's through 3/4" ply and some varnished covered tweed.

    Heat - A mate of mine who does repairs on guitar amps has cursed the fate of many Mesa Boogie amps of the early - mid 90's, tube tone was no longer passe' but unfortunately, anyone that knew anything about engineering electronics for tube use had become passe. The problem was that the tubes sockets for the Mesa's were soldered right onto the main circuit board - after a few short months of club use these amps were toast! The tubes had caused enough damage to the main board that they had to be replaced. Leo Fender designed his amps so that the tubes were mounted off the main board, and still does to a certain extent.

    Heat - Well kinda, guys, it's just not cool. If you really dig your tunes and are a true audiophile, you'll get yourself a device that is purpose built for the reproduction of music. Yeah, you're 'putey is kewl. But it's not one of these.

    I do think that this board is kinda funny.

    1. Re:Your PC is not a '59 Fender Bassman. by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Leo Fender died in 1991. Other than that, I agree with this post.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  35. TUBES ROCK!!! by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 2


    If they are serious (which I doubt), then they would be using a matched pair of tubes, not a single tube. Of course, they could also be reverting from stereo to mono. Anyway, tubes rock! I've got about a hundred of them sitting around for various projects, none of which involve motherboards.

  36. Ummm... why? by jbf · · Score: 2

    From the photo it looks like you're giving up two PCI slots for the tube and associated electronics, which are about as far away from the audio output as one could possibly place them. So you have to run the tube'd audio past all this noise, and they're not advertising balanced lines.

    For my two PCI slots in the ultimate audiophile machine, I think I'd drop in a ProTools board, and hang a 24/96 or 24/192 interface off of it. The analog audio would then all live inside a nice shielded box with a good power supply (computer power supplies aren't real clean), and I can hang outboard gear off of that box.

    Tubes are great for warmth and all, but there are much better places to put it. Like off the motherboard and in a separate shielded case. If they're serious about making their motherboards better for the audiophile, at least put a S/PDIF or ADAT out on the thing...

    1. Re:Ummm... why? by isaac · · Score: 2
      From the photo it looks like you're giving up two PCI slots for the tube and associated electronics, which are about as far away from the audio output as one could possibly place them. So you have to run the tube'd audio past all this noise, and they're not advertising balanced lines.

      According to HardOCP, that thing that looks like a power connector near the audio circuitry is actually the audio output header, so as least the signal isn't going quite so far on dinky traces.

      Agreed about the external DAC, though.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    2. Re:Ummm... why? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Ugh... try a real converter instead. Digi converters suck, and the recent ones suck so badly that they fall apart even when you just ask them to handle audio from a simple tape machine. They sound thin and small, and are so poorly designed that it sounds as if there's a bass rolloff when you try to do music signals. It measures flat with steady-state tones, but music isn't steady-state and the demands on the power supplies are VERY different from that.

      I mean, do what you want- but your idea of running an outboard DAC is good, it'd be a shame to see you waste it on Digi converters, especially the recent ones.

  37. Tubes in guitar amps: yes. Audio amps: no! by Blaede · · Score: 1

    I am a guitarist, and if you want the prototypical guitar distortion that comes to mind, a tube preamp (at the very least) coupled with a tube amp is the ticket. Why tubes, you say? Well you are CREATING a sound, not recreating one. The original guitarists were actually trying to recreate a a certain sound, and when transistor amps strted becoming more widespread, they found that the new "superior" gear didn't give them that sound they had gotten used to. In fact, it sounded "bad". Now, I am also an audio engineer, and the first rule of engineering is "any sound is usable". That's not to say that transitor amps for guitar work are unusable. As a guitarist, you go with what you like, and if a transistor amp is it, then so be it. But like I said, that prototypical heavy guitar sound (and even clean and slightly dirty) is best created with tube equipment. Decades of attempts with transistor gear have proven this. To those who are not guitarists, it seems backwards, but you have to keep in mind, sound creation is the goal here. The "inferiority" of tubes actually produces a pleasing result in this particular area.

  38. coming from the same r&d nutjobs by honold · · Score: 0

    that brought us the 'che che' motherboard - not surprised.

    search google for it and see for yourself! aopen's site is virtually dead, and i don't want the blood on my hands for direct-linking some reviewer

  39. basic electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To recap what's said a bit further down, a normal computer power supply could not put out the voltage needed to even warm up such a tube (do you really want to wait an hour for your audio to get up to speed? Consumers are impatient; they want everything NOW, which is why they have big capacitors in TV sets for this so-called instant-on that we take for granted.)

    As someone who's worked in music stores for years, and with computers even longer, i can say with some authority that a small onboard tube of the kind shown here (looks like a 12AX7) would be useless for output; you see this kind of thing more often in tube preamps for input, so it doesn't seem logical. others have noted the RF interference, and the fact that a *single* tube would only result in mono audio - a one-tube solution would be more suitable for an AM radio or a guitar distortion unit. I would point out the sheer size of the component (about 3 inches tall) and the fact that it gets as hot as a light bulb as factors that would mean *something* in the computer would start melting (even presuming the use of ceramic sockets) - it'll certainly put a damper on your overclocking.

    When it comes to audio and computers, the best solutions are high-end external A/D/A converters- the kind that support multiple sample rate options (the higher the better). If you want tube "warmth," you're not going to get it from one measly, underpowered preamp tube; you'll need a good tube *power amplifier* - not for loudness, but to provide more headroom before distortion sets in. These are about the size of 4U rack units and start at $3000 a pop....check www.audiogon.com for some listings :)

    More useful would be native support for super-high audio resolution formats like SACD; with over 100KHz frequency range it eliminates a lot of the audio artifacts present in 44.1KHz (current CD) audio, reproducing transient highs with exceptional fidelity, bringing back a lot of the "air" missing from consumer digital recordings. That and multi-channel ADAT Lightpipe i/o.....

    1. Re:basic electronics by unitron · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "...a normal computer power supply could not put out the voltage needed to even warm up such a tube..."

      Well, actually it's current that heats up a tube, not voltage, although it's the voltage that shoves the current through the tube's filament. Depending upon design of the tubes filament, the voltage necessary to deliver the filament current (A+) can range from 2 Volts for some "nuvistor" itty-bitty little tubes once used in TV tuners to 35 or 50 Volts for some tubes intended for "hot chassis" radios and TVs that have the various tubes filaments in series across the AC line so that you can drop 85 Volts across a couple of tubes and use the remaining 30 or so Volts for some 6 or 12 Volt tubes.

      Most of what are known as "receiving" tubes (tubes used in radios, TVs, and audio amps, including musical instrument amps, tend to use filaments designed for 6 or 12 Volts. If all the tubes in an amp use 6 Volt filaments and/or 12 Volt center-tapped filaments, you can heat 'em all with one secondary winding on the power transformer that they're connected in parallel across (sometimes with AC to DC rectification and filtering in between the secondary and the filaments).

      Perhaps you were thinking of the tube's plate voltage (B+), which can run from 40 or 50 Volts up to several hundred. However, not only can you build a switching regulator on a motherboard to change 5 Volts DC to 3.3, but you can also include one that'll step up the voltage. It may not amount to a lot of amperage (current), but it doesn't have to. You can use a transformer on the tube's output to change high voltage, low current to low voltage, high current because power = voltage times current on both sides of that transformer, although a little bit of the power does get used up in the transformer (turns into heat). That output transformer also provides isolation from the high-voltage plate supply.

      I only saw the top-down shot where you can almost fail to notice the tube, but it looks a little bit fat to be a 12AX7 or 12AU6 size envelope. I'd go find my old RCA tube manual and try to guess what they might be using, but it's old and falling apart (just like its owner :-), and doesn't need any unnecessary mileage put on it and besides I disremember just what it's currently buried under.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:basic electronics by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      I trust him a lot more than you, because HE works in a music store and can speak from authority! I doubt you can say the same, Mr. Smarty Pants.

    3. Re:basic electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unitron, thanks for clarifying my original post. I'm not an electronics whiz, I'm just smarter than the average Genesis fan. Which is not saying much. :) Indeed, it was the plate voltage I was thinking about. Still, I can't imagine that AOpen would spend the dough to put high-quality audio transformers and filter caps into the tube's power supply, so it likely would be noisy as all hell; and from an RF perspective, it can't be good for the computer unless they have a solid (i.e. SEAMLESS) Faraday cage around that whole section.

    4. Re:basic electronics by unitron · · Score: 2
      "...HE works in a music store and can speak from authority!"

      You are, of course, correct. I merely speak from nearly 40 years of knowledge and experience.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  40. Re:Ahhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be the Microsoft .NET Vacu-tron XP web server!

  41. who modded this garbage up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all you are dead wrong. 16,000 volts? Maybe a CRT or large neon sign. Ever look at the specs for small signal tubes like the one pictured? Look for yourself if you don't believe me:

    http://www.audio.com.hk/technique/vintage/html/1 2a x7.htm
    http://www.mclink.it/com/audiomatica/tubes /6dj8.ht m

    Max plate voltage 130, idiot.

    A flyback transformer in a tv generates around 30kv and is the size of a small orange. Hardly huge. It would be trivial to run 12vcd into an inverter and get 130 at 10ma which is more than enough.

  42. Does the Case Have a Window to See the Tube? by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...wondering about the ability of a switched psu to properly drive a tube amplification stage..."

    Five volts will make the filament glow nicely. That's all it will take to convince the tube enthusiasts that the sound is better. No need for the tube to actually do anything.

    To be somewhat less sarcastic, a small switcher could supply 100 volts or so for the plate, or they could use one of the 12 volt tubes that were developed for car radios.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Does the Case Have a Window to See the Tube? by gaudior · · Score: 2

      Brilliant! You are correct, Sir!

    2. Re:Does the Case Have a Window to See the Tube? by SWTP · · Score: 1

      I had totaly forgot the window people. Drop the neon and just the warm glow of a pare of tubes inside!

  43. My thoughts.. by zeno_2 · · Score: 2
    At first I thought it would be a good idea, but I looked at it for a moment and I find it to be somewhat useless. Why not buy a sound card of some sort that has an optical out to a real reciever? The sound card they use on that motherboard is an AC97 sound card, pretty much bottom of the line basic sound card. They did do a lot of stuff it looks like to stop the noise problems, but does this sound chip put out clean enough signals in the first place?

    I love stereo's, I used to be into car stereo's but now im more into home theater stuff. I enjoy a good system just as much as the next person. My computer right now is hooked up to a sony str-de825 receiver, paradigm phantom speakers, and a velodyne 12/15 sub. It thumps pretty good, and I can still hook my reciever up to my computer using an optical cable, but I need a pretty long one and they are expensive.

    I tried looking at this motherboard to see how it all works, but it doesn't mention much. Does it just use headphone jacks for the speakers, or does it have some way of accepting speaker cable? They say the motherboard is about 215 bucks, without the tube amp it would probably be about 150 bucks im guessing, so its a cheaper way of getting sound out of your pc vs. the external reciever/amp route. Here is a quote from their site:

    AOpen's hybrid AX4B-533Tube unquestionably is targeted to a very exclusive niche market - passionate audiophiles and extreme gamers who are interested in building their own ultimate entertaining PCs

    Id say that most passionate audiophiles also have enough money to buy equipment that would satisfy a passionate audiophile. So, that is a 'very' exclusive market, broke passionate audiophiles. The same goes for extreme gamers who want to build an ultimate entertaining pc (whatever that is supposed to mean. To me this includes a real home theater system =)

    Ah well, its something new, shouldn't knock it, its just not for me I don't think. Anyone here have the chance to see one of these in action?

  44. Electromagnetic noise.. the construction sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This extra add-on will increase the cost of the motherboard. But won't give you better sound!
    The motherboard is full of electromagnetic noise and certainly won't benefit from the extra heat nor hazardus voltages.
    Anyone serious about GOOD sound wants to keep those thoings OUT of the computer box or any digital circuits. That's usually translates to soundcard with S/P-dif or AES/EBU to a external A/D and ampfiler.

  45. Tubes=Distortion by occamboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a real live electrical engineer with a degree and everything. And, I listen to lots of music, mostly classical. And I have a pretty good ear -- I can often accurately identify the conductor when listening to a piece. Here goes: Properly designed transistor amps produce distortion that is below the threshold of audibility (0.1% THD). This is really easy to accomplish -- even $200 receivers routinely do it. Tubes produce very audible distortion, and they clip softly. I'm sure that it would be pretty easy to design a circuit to reproduce this distortion and the soft clipping for the fine folks who enjoy it.

    1. Re:Tubes=Distortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you do that, and you could sell a lot of amplifiers. Do that when those transistors are heavily overdriven, and you could sell even more.

      I agree that with enough components you could make a solid-state circuit with identical-to-tube sound, just that it would turn out to be cheaper to just make a tube amp in the end. Tube circuits are ultimately rather simple...

    2. Re:Tubes=Distortion by Sleeper · · Score: 1

      That has been tried already. Solid state guitar amps with dsp to try to emulate responce of the old tube amps in fact there are models such amps that give you a responce sellection of different "classical" tube amps. However musicians do not like them and still prefer real tube amps

      --
      - Back off man. I am a scientist
    3. Re:Tubes=Distortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many years ago (late 1970's ?) an audio designer named Carver (is he and/or his company still around?) did exactly what you suggest - a circuit to fake "tube" sound in an SS amp. Compared favorably to the real thing in double-blind (IIRC) listening tests.

    4. Re:Tubes=Distortion by occamboy · · Score: 1

      Figures. Good testing of audio equipment UNFAILINGLY shows that starnge mental constructs are more important than reality. I've yet to see a SINGLE double-blind test where ANY "golden-eared audiophile" could tell the difference between any two pieces of equipment, other than speakers or turntable cartridges.

      I suppose that wasting money on audio crap is marginally better than spending it on crack.

    5. Re:Tubes=Distortion by occamboy · · Score: 1

      Transistor circuits are even simpler. Bipolar theory is a bit tough to understand (or at least is almost always poorly-taught), but the actual circuits are simple. FETs are simple a lot like tubes in theory, and also require trivially simple circuits.

    6. Re:Tubes=Distortion by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm sure that it would be pretty easy to design a circuit to reproduce this distortion and the soft clipping for the fine folks who enjoy it.

      Very true. And there's a great story about it. Bob Carver, the amplifier designer, once took one of the much-touted High End tube amps into a test lab and characterized its transfer function. He then built a transistor amp designed to match the transfer function of the tube amp. In blind testing, listeners, even fanatical High End types, couldn't tell the difference.

      It didn't sell.

      So, partly as a joke, he designed the Carver Silver 7, the most overdesigned tube amplifier ever built. $25,000. All tube. Separate power supply, preamp, and power stage chassis. For each channel. Everything chrome-plated.

      It sold. Got great reviews. "Amplifier of the Decade" from The Absolute Sound. Carver must have laughed all the way to the bank.

    7. Re:Tubes=Distortion by occamboy · · Score: 1

      Given what I know about hearing (as it happens, my minor in college was neurobiology) I'm rather convinced that a well-designed DSP-based system will perfectly emulate anything you want it to as far as the ear is concerned -- that is, a well-designed solid-state system will not be distinguishable from a tube in a properly-designed double-blind test. A scientist. How cute.

    8. Re:Tubes=Distortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to listen a little closer. Tube guys like tube amps, because there's less distortion. Try actually listening to the music. Are you actually claiming that people spend tons of money on better components then use a tube amp to add distortion?

    9. Re:Tubes=Distortion by occamboy · · Score: 1

      I suggest that YOU listen closer. Stick some instrumentation in the chain and do some analysis. Yes, people spend extra money first to reduce already-inaudible distortion, and then pay more extra money to add loads 'o audible distortion. Some people also spend good money to get tied up, naked, with ball gags in their mouths and to perform various demeaning acts. I don't understand that either, but whatever turns people on...

    10. Re:Tubes=Distortion by SanLouBlues · · Score: 2

      The best makers of solid state tube imitations:
      http://www.line6.com/main/main.cfm

      But only insturment amps, not stereo amps.

    11. Re:Tubes=Distortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should quit whatever your current job is and get in the guitar amp business then.

      Because everyone has been trying to solve this problem for over 20 years... and hasn't yet.

      Nobody makes a solid state amp that sounds anything like the single channel mesa i've got sitting next to me.
      Lots of people have tried. There are lots of modelling amps that sound ... nice but the real deal is still an all tube amplifier...

      Millions of dollars every year is spent on amps that try to sound as good as tube amps and dont. Millions more is spent every year on real tube amps because as inconvenient and as bulky and as hot and as heavy as they are, they just sound unbeatable.

      Think of all those millions just waiting for you and your impressive degree!

    12. Re:Tubes=Distortion by luxaeterna7 · · Score: 1

      Hearing is one thing, but for a musician, FEEL is something else.

      --
      "the devil finds work for idle circuits"
    13. Re:Tubes=Distortion by multiplexo · · Score: 1

      Please step away from the crackpipe. Sir, put the crackpipe down and please step away from it. I have a Sunfire Signature Classic Tube Preamplifier, I picked it up a few years ago when I had some money and it was being liquidated by Magnolia HiFi in Seattle. It's a neat amp, it's built like a tank, has an impressive phono stage, does not have lots of useless flashing lights and has a neat window in the front so you can look inside and see the tubes. This amp, which lists for about $2000 and which I paid $900 for, has specifications that are almost identical to the $250 Onkyo preamp that it replaced. Does it sound better than the Onkyo preamp? Well, I would have to say, with ears battered by 13 years of working on armored vehicles and spending weekends at a firing range, that it doesn't, it just looks cooler. Compare the published specifications on any piece of tube gear with those of a similar piece of solid-state gear and you will find that the solid state gear performs better in terms of distortion.
      Also tube gear is horrendously inefficient. I was considering building a pair of tube power amplifiers a few years back. I was interested in a 200 wpc design, one of the biggest reasons I didn't build these was the fact that each amp would consume about 1Kw of power. Now, if the audio power output is 200wpc where are those extra 800 watts going? Well, they're making the room warmer, which is fine in the winter, when you can play your music and have a 1600 watt space heater, but is not so good in the summer.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    14. Re:Tubes=Distortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.1 percent THD would be rather high for a tube linestage even if is has no feedback, considering that tubes are much more linear than transistors. Build such a stage and wrap a bypass switch around it, you cannot tell from the sound wether it is on the signal or not. And clipping is irrelevant at line levels, perhaps 2V RMS, in a circuit that can swing perhaps 50V RMS.

      But I suspect that they do not use tube amplification because there is only one tube for both channels. They use an opamp and the tube is a meaningless cathode follower, just window dressing. For a good design I need more than one tube.

  46. Re:basic electronics (Fine print) by eXtro · · Score: 1

    I noticed right away that it didn't say it had tube output, it said it supports vacuum tube audio output. I imagine any tube on the device is there more for effect than anything else. The most important part would be the filter capacitors but I still wouldn't use this with anything other than the crap Creative puts out as amplifiers and speakers.

  47. this must be a joke by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    As other /.'ers have pointed out, this MUST be a joke. A single vacuum tube in an amplifier doesn't serve any purpose but as a heater (or maybe just amplifies the center channel??)

    I could imagine using a few (maybe fake) vacuum tubes in a case mod, that would be very cool. Or maybe build the power supply with tubes?? Has anyone tried that?

    Oh well. I wouldn't mind having a nice tube amp OUTSIDE the computer for listening to MP3s .. it might fend off the digital noise of those 128k encoded MP3s.

    What I really need to do is replace the 21-inch vacuum tube I stare into all day with a nice flat-panel model...

  48. Clearly a Joke by ChanxOT5 · · Score: 1

    A Very nicely done joke though :)

    Notice, the only working link on the whole page is the the AOpen museum?

    hmm... *cough* *cough* free advertising to the slashdot community, and even adbuster wont filter it :P

    ~ERTW.

  49. They're all harmonics! by Mr+Z · · Score: 5, Informative
    Absolutely, the thing is that tubes distort harmonically while solid state amps tend to distort rather dissonantly and horribly.

    Huh? They're all harmonics. Tube and certain kinds of FET (field effect transistor) based amps have a "soft limiting", so when they get close to clipping, they tend to generate even harmonics. Three of the first four even harmonics are exactly 1, 2, and 4 octaves away (2nd, 4th, and 8th harmonics), and so this form of distortion tends to be more melodic and pleasant. The 6th, 10th and so on aren't so melodic, but since the amplitude of the harmonics drops as you go to higher harmonics, you're ok.

    BJT (bipolar junction transistor) based amps (and other types of solid state amps) tend to clip rather hard. No soft-limiting, they stop right at the rails. This clipping action creates a boatload of odd harmonics. These harmonics are fairly dissonant, giving the harsh sound most people complain about.

    But they're all harmonics.

    --Joe
    1. Re:They're all harmonics! by mesocyclone · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Errr.... harmonics at clipping are all fun and that, but only if you have one sine wave in your amplifier. With real music, you have lots of signal in there. Then, any kind of nonlinearity, whether tube or solid state, will produce intermodulation which consists of sum and difference frequencies. Intermod is infinitely annoying and the real problem with distortion in amplifiers.

      The math of this is simple - and applies to RF as well as AF. Take two of the signals in the systemm and approximate them for as sin waves. The nonlinearity can be modeled as a power series, so you have terms of the form:

      f(a,b) = A*(a + b) + B*(a + b)^2 + C*(a + b)^3...

      Substitute

      a=sin(w1*t+phi)
      b=sin(w2*t)

      And do the trig and you can see that you end up with all sorts of neat frequencies such as

      w1-w2, 2*w1-w2, etc.

      Now, instead of f(a,b), imagine f(a,b,c,d,e,f,g...)_ and you can see the mess that intermodulation makes. It basically mixes (in the frequency domain) all of the signals AND all of their harmonics in all possible combinations!

      Tube amplifiers *do* sound different because their distortion curves are different than solid state amps. Why audio "purists" prefer one distortion curve to another is what I don't understand. What I want is minimal distortion overall!

      But then, audiophiles also buy gigantic cables because they imagine that their speakers will sound better attached to them... etc.

      Technical note: The coefficients on the various terms of the power series tend to go down with the order of the term. And, some configurations approximately cancel out all odd or even terms.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    2. Re:They're all harmonics! by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      I'm at least somewhat aware of intermodulation but I decided to not talk about it. Your tech note at the end sums up tube-lover's main argument though: And, some configurations approximately cancel out all odd or even terms. If you cancel out mostly odd terms leaving mostly even terms, at least the result is reasonably melodic, which was my main point.

      I personally agree that minimal distortion is best. If you want a "warmer" sound to your music, mix it, equalize it or otherwise process it that way up front.

      --Joe
    3. Re:They're all harmonics! by io333 · · Score: 0

      The word the poster was looking for was "harmoniously," and in that sense the poster would have been correct.

    4. Re:They're all harmonics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a "warmer" sound to your music, mix it, equalize

      Nooooo!!!! If you want a warmer sound, then get components that tend to color the sound that way or, even better, modify your listening room.

      Equalizers are bad. They add signal path and an extra gain stage. Boosting signals risks pushing the input of the next stage beyond its design and creating distortion, while cutting signals reduces S/N ratio. That's why equalizers just aren't used in high-end audio systems.

    5. Re:They're all harmonics! by stapedium · · Score: 1

      Nice explanation of intermodulation distortion.

      Don't forget that even using that $5/foot cable and tube amps that the major source of distortion in most sound systems is the speakers. Don't believe me. Just ask your high end speaker dealer to give you specs on the amount of distortion that $5000 pair of speakers produces. He won't tell you. Why? Because it is about two orders of magnitude larger than what even a $200 amp at BestBuy produces. Heck, even your ears produce more distortion than most modern transistor based amps. Look up distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

      Speakers are the weak link in any audio system, well maybe not one where the amplifier is placed next to a 400W switching power supply, but almost any audio system.

    6. Re:They're all harmonics! by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      I can't believe this isn't modded +5 yet (1AM est). Usually people that bust out equations on slashdot get modded up instantly. In fact, if i had moderator points, i'd probably glance at it, say "I don't understand that", and mod it up, because anyone that writes something that I don't understand is Insightful, right?

      This all looks legit, from the 5 times I attended my Engineering Fundamentals class before switching majors, i recognize some of this.

      But honestly, you could be bullshitting the entire thing, and about 4 people on slashdot would know it.

      I didn't know there were this many audiophiles that read slashdot.

      On a side note, i used to sell stereo equipment at best buy, and i was always skeptical of the "high end thick" cables (monster cable). I wondered how good it could really be if we paid mabey a buck more for it, but charged 35 bucks more for the RCA cables than the generic RCA cables, wondered where the extra quality was comming from if it was that profitable.
      Then one day, an electrical engineer came in and flat out proved to me with numbers, resistanace, etc, that you don't need anything more than 16 gauge wire for anything any amp we sold at best buy could put out into any pair of speakers we sold.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:They're all harmonics! by sigwinch · · Score: 3, Informative
      But honestly, you could be bullshitting the entire thing, and about 4 people on slashdot would know it.
      I'm one of the 4. ;-) The description of how nonlinearity causes "interesting" intermodulation in complex signals is spot on. BTW, RF engineers deal with multi-signal intermodulation all the time (cell phone base stations, cable TV amplifiers, etc.)
      Then one day, an electrical engineer came in and flat out proved to me with numbers, resistanace, etc, that you don't need anything more than 16 gauge wire for anything any amp we sold at best buy could put out into any pair of speakers we sold.
      And even if it did make a difference, heavy speaker cable should only cost a little more than jumper cables. You could even make an (almost) impedance-matched 8.3 ohm coax by putting six 50 ohm coaxes in parallel, and it still wouldn't cost as much as the ridiculous audiophile cables.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    8. Re:They're all harmonics! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      As a reply to your side note, my Sony STR-DE675 (sold at Best Buy, I'm sure) is more than powerful enough to overload 16 gauge wire. I had to drop to 12 gauge on my center channel (not sold at Best Buy, but not incredibly high-powered speakers) because the amp kept overloading on rather low sound levels. And a DE675 isn't even all that powerful a stereo. But I did buy that 12 gauge from Home Depot, cos I'm sure as shit not paying $10/ft for Monster cable. I see that 8 gauge gold plated crap and kind of wonder what people are thinking when they buy that stuff. Everyone knows it's all going fiber optic anyway. :)

    9. Re:They're all harmonics! by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      the whole high-end speaker cable thing amazes me as well, the big telling thing I learned was that monster cable is a price-fixing company, they dictate what prices vendors charge for their cables, place like best buy, and audio king are not allowed to put monster cable on sale, or give discounts. otherwise they loose the privilage of selling monster cable.

      what really got me was the $40 toslink (optical digital) cables. "GOLD PLATED" optical cables.. that's so much bullshit it's not even funny. the quality of optical cable needed for toslink is so low it's laughable. a 16bit stereo 44khz datastream is around 1.5mbit of data. and all of the toslink cables i've seen are PLASTIC.. it's not even real glass fiber. another odd note is that they arn't using infrared laser diodes to do toslink.. it's basicaly a focused cheap LED.. so you don't have to worry about reflection angles in the toslink cable.

      I personaly buy the cheap $12 toslink cable from best buy.. and it sounds 100% perfect.. I have yet to hear any signifigant bit loss (would sound like a scratched CD) in my stereo. (yamaha RXV-995, and definitive tech. BP-8b mains)

    10. Re:They're all harmonics! by ALecs · · Score: 1
      And even if it did make a difference, heavy speaker cable should only cost a little more than jumper cables. You could even make an (almost) impedance-matched 8.3 ohm coax by putting six 50 ohm coaxes in parallel, and it still wouldn't cost as much as the ridiculous audiophile cables.

      It does make a difference because of the frequency of the signal travelling down the wire. Jumper cables transfer DC...a LOT of DC. Speaker cables carry AC...very sensitively modulated AC. The two tasks require completely different cables. That's why high-grade audio cable (Tributaries, EAR, etc.) has lots and lots of very small pieces of wire.

      At AF frequencies, current travels better along the surface of the conductor than through it. So, having more conductors increases your surface area. This is also why radio transmitting equipment (like what I have in my HAM shack) uses grounding foil instead of heavy-guage wire (sometimes people even use copper braid!). You want better conduction of high frequencies to ground so they don't end up on your chassis. You want better conduction of the very subtle highs in your music to your speakers so you can hear them.

    11. Re:They're all harmonics! by nexthec · · Score: 1

      I used to sell home and car(and install) and I have some great stories. Tho one of my favorites is I had a customer that claimed he could hear the difference between different colored fiberoptic cables ;->. that or the guy who's car I installed. 3 MTX amps. one was rated at about 10A of continous draw and 40 peak.....the others were like 20 A continous and about 60 A peak. he was driving two kove audio 15's and a set of fronts (focal?) and his alternator output like 65 amps at peak RPM. to battle this he had us install a 15 farad cap. still dosent solve the problem when he is a full volume for a long time. but he loved to cruise at about 15 MPH, and full volume with his AC on. we kept telling him he needed a new alternator, didnt belive us. finally boom goes the alternator, and takes out 2 of the amps, the head unit, and both front speakers, and one of the 15's.

    12. Re:They're all harmonics! by nexthec · · Score: 1

      at 20 khz it not as big of a deal as say 2.4MHz

    13. Re:They're all harmonics! by wampus · · Score: 1

      Four words: gold plated optical cable.

      I just picked up a DTS receiver at Best Buy, asked the sales guy for a TOSlink cable for my CD changer. He came back and dropped a 12 foot cable in my cart. It was something like $50, but there wouldn't be any signal loss because of the gold plated connectors and the sheilding.

      I dropped the cable into a bin full of Brittney Spears CDs because I didn't feel like explaining why the very thought of that cable pissed me off.

    14. Re:They're all harmonics! by Sherloqq · · Score: 1

      ... You could even make an (almost) impedance-matched 8.3 ohm coax by putting six 50 ohm coaxes in parallel ...

      What a way to recycle old 10Base2 cabling and terminators... We could make million$! :)

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
  50. Re:Ahhh... by 1010011010 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Maybe the admin can just telnet in over a wireless connection and fix the problem!

    Windows is so cool!

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  51. Re:First-ish post! by ozzimark · · Score: 0

    There is somehting that everyone is leaving out of this, most of the tubes that are in use are used primarily for good distortion - note: DISTORTION

    I don't know why they are putting it in for audio, most people I know prefer to listen to stuff the way it was intended, not mushed up garbage disposal sounds. The sound is not richer at all, more like the same with multible reproductions of the same sound within itself.
    In addition to this, tubes put off a tremendous amount of heat, and must be replaced rather often. Think again if you want to say that tubes are an innovative idea in a PC.

    --
    C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg
  52. so lemme get this straight.... by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

    you're going to pay extra cash to have unreliable components (although tubes do sound much cooler....) put into a system that won't really allow for easy replacement so that you can listen to lossily compressed music (mp3s) .... . ... where do I sign up?? : )

  53. Ding Ding Ding.... by Silver222 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We have a winner!


    The most common argument the tube lovers trot out is that the best guitar amps use them. They seem to forget that when you are listening to music, you want something that accurately reproduces the sound on your source, you don't want something that changes the source.


    "Audiophiles", flame away.

    --
    "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
    1. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by scumm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not a semi-serious guitar players, I'm a pretty overly serious guitar player, and these guys are almost entirely correct.

      Since the late 70's (for the most part - some have never bothered to change) venues have tended to use solid state amplification for sound reinforcement, for the reasons listed above - more efficient power consumption, more reliable, etc.

      For guitars, tube amps just sound better. Digital modelling, etc., all try to REPRODUCE the sound of a tube amps, not best it. That's fairly telling. The reasons tube amps sound better for guitars are varied, but are mostly centered around overdriving the amp. The distortion comes on very smoothly as you roll the volume up, and responds to dynamics much better.

      For home stereo? Some of the best audiophile home stereos I've heard have been tube (mid 70's Marantz gear), and some have been transistor (late 70's Marantz gear). But tube amps are just NOT cost effective anymore, and almost all of the supposed advantages are just audiophile snobbery.

      Another problem with current tube amps is the downright sorry state of tubes. You have to search REALLY hard to find a really high quality 6L6, 12AX7, or EL34 nowadays, and those are the most common used in amplifiers. Hell, the only place to find really high quality ones, like Mullards or Telefunkens I've found is eBay. And they're expensive.

      Remember, audiophiles don't listen to music, they listen to noise, and therefore souldn't be taken seriously.

    2. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Tube amps give a "soft" or "warm" tone to music, and it is this exact thing that the audiophiles have tuned themselves to hear. Also tube amps take some time to adjust on the lead and trailing edge of a crest, so that say a digital recording like a cd can actually sound better on the tube amp as it is essentially doing interpolation between the samples. Most of these same effects can be had by doing supersampling and effects processing with a modern sound processor like the EMU10k2. While some of the features on their soundblaster cards are screwed (like digital imports, supersample a 16 bit 44.1 source to 48 and then dither back down to 44.1 for instance) the chips that they are based around are actually very good and go into other more robust products like the Korg Triton line.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      You're right, but you forget to mention even-order harmonics vs. odd-order harmonics.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    4. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fscking little tinear dweezle - the question is one of a non-linear transfer curve ... it's not a question of if - failure happens, but 'roll-off' of that failure --- fsckin' dweezle too usta bitzhostile *nix that rolls off like a $5 whore.

    5. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by scumm · · Score: 1

      Damnit, I knew I misses something!

      Harmonics on solid state amps are seriously wonky. Actually, that's not 100% true anymore. A high quality solid state guitar amp nowadays will produce proper harmonics.

      But yeah, you're right.

    6. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      IANAGT (guitar tech), but isn't the even vs odd harmonics issue in tube amps partly a product of how they're wired (ie class A vs class AB?)

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    7. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by scumm · · Score: 1

      While it's true that it's a product of wiring in most cases, it can be avoided.

      In tube amps, distortion is a result of the addition of even harmonics to the original frequency, or...

      base + 1/2sin(2x) + 1/4sin(4x) + 1/6sin(6x) etc...

      The same thing, incrementing the variable by 1, is how odd harmonics are generated. To the non-guitar players, this might look like a small difference, but it's the difference between a warm, horn-like vibrato and a buzz-saw sound.

      I'm not an expert on the latest in Trans amp technology, but a friend of mine who's designed and worked on a number of amplifiers claims that a few companies (Fender and Marshall, for instance) have found ways to artificially introduce even harmonics in their solid-state amplifiers. Without personal testing and intimate knowlege of the electronics, I can't comment on this (I'm pretty good with tubes. Transistors require too much specialized knowledge - I spend that brain space on programming).

      All of this, of course, can be completely faked with amplifier modellers (Line6 POD thingies, Fender Cyber series amplifiers, Roland stuff, etc), but they have their own set of problems.

      Buy the way, a piece of free, extremely valuable advice for anybody out there with a tube amp! COOL IT. You're Slashdot people, so you probably know all about cooling, but might not have though of cooling an amplifier. The #1 thing I've seen that destroys old tube amps is overheating. I have an old Fender Twin you could cook an egg on. I wasted a few tubes before I figured out that the incidental heat was destroying the tubes (and damaging who knows what else). I put in a few cheapie computer fans, to help move the hot air out the open back (do NOT leave the backs on tube amps, they turn into ovens), and I haven't replaced the tubes in over a year now.

    8. Re:Ding Ding Ding.... by luxaeterna7 · · Score: 1

      A well designed tube amp (like a Fender) shouldn't fry tubes unless there is something wrong with the amp. Have you biased the tubes correctly? Have you had the amp checked out by an experienced tech?

      I've owned many different tube amps over the years and I've gigged them heavily, I've never had one fry tubes due to overheating. Now, I know some of the bigger tube bass amps need some cooling like those Mesa Boogie 200+ watt jobs, but a Twin Reverb shouldn't get hot enough to fry tubes unless it's biased too hot.

      --
      "the devil finds work for idle circuits"
  54. Can you explain this to me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly is a *VACUUM* supposed to conduct heat??

  55. What's the point? by Poppageorgio · · Score: 0

    Anybody who would even be remotely interested in tube amps would use a digital out from the PC, and then into a preamp or tube amp to get away from the electrical noise going on inside a PC case.
    .

    --
    Me fail English? That's unpossible!
  56. Re:Information wants to be free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you guys just fix this damn page widening? Seriously, how hard could it be...

  57. Man, some people. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    didn't take their "irony pills" this morning.

    KFG

    1. Re:Man, some people. . . by Takeel · · Score: 1

      didn't take their "irony pills" this morning.

      Irony would be if your Windows boxed blue-screened just after you submitted that comment.

  58. [H] by Jedi1USA · · Score: 1

    There is some info on [H]ard|OCP showing what apears to be a functional board at Coputex right now.

    http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MzAy

    --
    My old sig was REALLY stoopid.
    1. Re:[H] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, mod this one up! gimme gimme, im a lemming!

  59. Possible? Yep. by Mark19960 · · Score: 2, Informative

    How? you ask?
    Easy. they state they have a switched mode power supply on board.
    for those that dont know, you can step up that meager 12 volts to 5,000 volts if you wanted.
    also, they state that it is a DUAL TRIODE tube.
    this may very well NOT be a joke. it can be done. issues I have with this setup include noise, heat, and if the tube is socketted.. or available if it dies down the road. todays power supplies are better filtered than the supplies of yesterday, and im sure that the tube is better made, as well.
    I may want one just for the hell of it, you have to admit... its pretty damned neat

    1. Re:Possible? Yep. by satterth · · Score: 1

      Yup, if you have a close look at the pictures posted on Hard-Ocp from Computex you will see that it looks like a socket for the tube.

      /satterth

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  60. Re:phirst fost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you mean the devils? 'Cause there ain't no BSD trolls
    ps cyb0rg m0nkey is my father

  61. Re:Ahhh... by edrugtrader · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Not that this is by any means acceptible, but at least they are trying!

    [quoting your link]
    To address this weakness, Microsoft modified the Telnet implementation that the company includes in Win2K. Win2K's Telnet server can handle not only clear-text authentication but also NT LAN Manager (NTLM) authentication. NTLM encrypts usernames and passwords as they cross the network so that they can't be discovered.

    However, there's a catch. To use NTLM to authenticate to the Telnet server, you must have a Telnet client that supports NTLM. The only client that supports NTLM authentication is Microsoft's Telnet client. So, if you intend to telnet into your systems only from Win2K's Telnet client, you can secure your Telnet service by restricting it to support only NTLM authentication. If you plan to accept Telnet sessions from clients that don't support NTLM authentication, you'll need to step down your security

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  62. AC97 was Re:its a waste! by foonf · · Score: 3, Informative
    BUT useing the ac 97 codec??? i have never heard very good sound out of one of them, and i have always found it to be just that codec, if they would do it with a good audio chip, it would be much better.
    just my thoughts...

    Really, what kind of sound card do you have? If you are using your computer for high-end audio production or music composition and are talking about truly high-end sound cards, that statement has some merit, no commercial AC 97 codec can probably produce what you would consider "good sound".

    Presuming this is not the case, its probable, unless you have in fact a very obsolete or low-quality sound card, that it in fact uses an AC 97 codec similar to those used by many onboard sound interfaces. AC 97 is just a generic standard defining an interface between the sound codec (which actually produces the sound) and the controller (which attaches it to the bus, and provides DSP and synthesis functionality is some cases). Even expensive consumer sound cards like the Creative ones and the Hercules Game Theater use codecs which are AC 97 compatible. Most of the criticism of motherboard audio either has to do with the lack of features (which given that even expensive consumer sound cards don't do hardware MIDI synthesis anymore, isn't terribly relevant except for video game players) or the poor sound quality (which doesn't have to do with the AC 97 standard per se, but low quality of individual codecs and poor electrical design. None of these things are universals, I have a notebook which uses the AC 97 codec interface of its motherboard chipset, but a Crystal codec (identical to the one used by most of the CS4630 cards like the Santa Cruz, Game Theater, etc.), and produces very nice output.
    --

    "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
  63. Audiophile/Computer Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    What is AOpen thinking? I have a few comments...

    First. The audiophile market is a small and
    discriminating bunch.

    Second. If they intended to capture a
    semi-professional audio recording market... they
    would have been better off teaming up with
    Apogee or Digidesign for a high quality D/A - A/D

    A poster mentioned odd order harmonics causing a
    "harsh" tonality; more accurately, the odd order
    harmonics cause ear fatigue. An instrument that
    produces odd order harmonics is a clarinet.

    Don't mod me down because I post anonymously...
    I rather like my privacy.

  64. Re:New disk drive also in development for this boa by SWTP · · Score: 1

    Actualy what is funny is that a CD is basicaly one long grove like a vinyl record.

  65. And also, on this mobo... by Lobsang · · Score: 2

    Instead of the traditional CD-ROM, you have a vynil LP player, a cassette players instead of a disk drive and a round tube black & white zenith TV as the monitor. The keyboard is clickety clackety and mechanic, with round keys.

    And the commercial is something like:
    "Easy to Use, easy as Hell"
    :)

    1. Re:And also, on this mobo... by bluenova · · Score: 1

      Maybe then I would have a way to listen to my collection of 15,000+ LPs and burn select ones to CD. I am one of those sick people that loves the way a Clean LP sounds on a good turntable, but until someone comes up with a way to play some in the car (reliably), I've been recording using an old reciever as a preamp and running through a Livewire!. I'll fight with anyone to say that an LP sounds better than a CD (waves vs. sampling, yada, yada), but CD's are just more convenient to pack around. Kind of like tubes vs. Solid state...

  66. Not tube amp, tube preamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can condition the signal before it gets amplified. And you can do it with one tube. Whether this has any real effect after amplification is in doubt. I was eyeballing the picture for a minute and it ceratinly look legitimate. Hell, it may be stupid but I bet they sell as many as they make.

  67. The RIAA put them up to it... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

    In their never-ending quest to turn back the clock, the RIAA has announced their latest tool to fight music piracy on the high seas and in your home - vacuum tube based soundcards. Not happy with preventing digital SACD and DVD-Audio playback on consumer stereo equipment much less consumer PCs, the RIAA is now forcing all motherboard manufacturers to support only the oldest functioning technology for audio playback known to man.

    Hillary Rosen was quoted as saying this hardware program will finally end the Napster menace once and for all.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:The RIAA put them up to it... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      The oldest functioning technology for audio playback is pure mechanical. The old gramophone recording systems had no electric amplification at all. When I was a kid, and had lots of grandma and grandpa's old records, I remember some of them from the early 20's saying 'recorded electrically' on them- those were the new leading edge discs.

  68. Re:Can you explain this to me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They radiate heat.

  69. Re:Can you explain this to me ... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

    You've clearly never seen a vacuum tube device in operation.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  70. Re:who are they kidding? Too noisy! by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    Note, too, that the amplifier's final section is on the opposite side of the board from where the ATX audio connectors are. I'm no analog guru, but I'd bet dollars to donuts (mmm... donuts) that those traces running right under the PCI slots will pick up a ton of noise on the way. Besides, with a P4 CPU, you can emulate the tube's distortion in software.

    Save the money and buy a good sound card with a high SNR (Turtle Beach Santa Cruz (plug,plug))

  71. Re: New disk drive also in development by edgarde · · Score: 1, Informative
    Incidentally, these disks are now writeable

    It goes without saying that tube-favoring audiophiles will use external devices for playing music. However, the tube amp is still be desireable for system beep tones.

  72. Great! Finally a use for all those... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuvistors I picked up on eBay!

    http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/what_the_nuvistor .h tm

    It would be cool if someone put Nuvistors on a mobo. I'll let you have the tubes, but I'll sell you the sockets... :)

  73. tubes are used in mics and preamps too by dickens · · Score: 1

    This is just too strange, and I have to suspect that it's a joke.

    But I should point out that not only are tubes used in guitar amps (like the 2 12AX7s and 4 6L6s in my '61 black-face Showman), they are also used in some of the big-buck microphone preamps.

    If you buy a $5,000 austrian or german condenser mic, it's like to have a tube *inside* it too.

    There must be a reason for that.

  74. Pictures by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    at HardOCP

    1. Re:Pictures by n6mod · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ahh, excellent link. From the photos, we can see that the tube is a Sovtek 6922. Google tells us that thetubestore.com calls the 6922 "Sovtek's premium version of the 6DJ8." Which everyone should recognize as a dual triode. Data here tells us that it has 6.3V filaments (perfect for coexistance with any 25120's that may be required by future DRM schemes), wants 90V B+ (plate voltage) and has a max Plate Dissipation of 1.8W.

      This is a preamp tube, which is appropriate, actually. Get those nice GloFET harmonics and then feed it to some decent SandAmp for actual power.

      Interesting concept. Twisted, and I don't think I want my preamp tube in the same faraday cage as my P4, but it is interesting.

      -Z

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    2. Re:Pictures by io333 · · Score: 0

      For the less tube savvy out there, that means it is a preamp that can drive six channels.

    3. Re:Pictures by n6mod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For the less tube savvy out there, that means it is a preamp that can drive six channels.

      Uhh, no. It's a dual triode. That means it has two sections each of which have three electrodes. Those three electrodes are Plate, Grid, and Cathode, which map roughly to Emitter, Base, and Collector. (I think...it's been a while) Actually, I suppose Source, Gate, and Drain are more appropriate, this being a GloFET.

      In any case, there are two devices, not six, so you get two channels, not six. In fact, I'm pretty sure the 6DJ8 was designed for balanced operation, not stereo. For the less tube savvy out there, that means it was designed for one channel, not two.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    4. Re:Pictures by ShoeHead · · Score: 1

      So... how many of you actually think this guy knows what he's talking about?

    5. Re:Pictures by rknize · · Score: 1

      The 6922 (E88CC to our UK friends) was originally designed for use as a cascode. However, since there is only one tube and it is likely (hopefully) a gain stage, then it is probably a single self-biased, common-cathode triode per channel. That would only require 6.3V (or 12.6V) for the heaters and an HT probably around 200V.

      This does beg the question about the output impedence of this preamp, which in general isn't very good for common cathode amps operating at low current. On the other hand, the output capacitors (Hovland Musicaps?) look to be quite large, which implies that it can drive a fairly low impedance amp.

      Properly shielded and assuming the inverter used to created the HT is electrically quiet, this preamp could make some nice sound.

      Russ W. Knize

      --
      Russ W. Knize
  75. Is it real - all signs point no by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    It bugs me a little bit that I have to sift through the comments to find out the existing, deterministic answer to a single question the article asks. From power req to heat generated, it looks like almost a unanimous "NO". The answer should be updated to reflect it.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  76. Firebottle, but not Firewire? by n6mod · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now, I was almost ready to buy one of these, GloFET and all, but there's no Firewire. And since that lovely firebottle takes so much room, there are only 3 PCI slots... One for FW, One for the HD tuner, One for Gigabit, One for SCSI... oops, no more slots.

    On the flip side, I've never been much for case windows...but this board NEEDS a window!

    -Z

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  77. Lee De Forest by FunkyRat · · Score: 2

    You're thinking of Lee De Forest who was the inventor of the audion tube, the tube equivalent of the transistor. De Forest is also one of the most fascinating men of the 20th century, one of the last great lone inventors whose invention spurred development of everything from the long distance phone network to the first digital computers.

    If you ever get a chance I highly recommend reading Tom Lewis' book Empire of the Air which profiles the three men probably most resposible for the modern age of communication: Lee De Forest, Edwin Howard Armstrong and David Sarnoff. IIRC, Ken Burns also did a documentary based on the book for PBS. These are truly three of the most interesting, and in many ways, most tragic men whom have ever lived.

  78. Big Capacitor by ReverendRyan · · Score: 1

    It looks like there is one hell of a capacitor next to the tube. (as big as the northbridge!!) It could be a 300+ volt cap. I have seen higher voltages in a smaller cap before.

    Still, like everyone else is saying, there is no point in *one* tube. But who uses onboard audio anyway?

  79. I don't get their logic by entity0110 · · Score: 0

    The reason tube based amps still have a following is because many people belive that tube based systems have more "punch" then digital based amp's meaning the amp can deliever more raw power when a sudden burst of vloume is required by the amplifier. Which is all good, but we are not talking about home audio we are talking about PC audio where the real power is produced from the Speakers internal amp/subwoofer . It is completly pointless to integrate a tube based amp on the mb unless Aopen plans to be driving the speakers themselves with this amp which I find highly unlicky with a stadard ATX power suppy

  80. Insightful? Shouldn't that be "Funny" by name_already_taken · · Score: 1
    While I really think this motherboard is some kind of delayed Taiwanese April Fools' joke...

    1) Cooling - You don't cool tubes, they like heat. That's why they're called thermionic devices. It would be nice to see a metal sleeve on the tube to act as a sheild against all the EMI from the motherboard though.

    2)Availability of replacements - Check the little ads in the back of any audiophile type magazine and you'll find plenty of tube suppliers. Or you could just go to the local electronics store and order a new tube. I've restored plenty of tube-based devices and never waited longer than a week for a tube.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  81. Re:Ahhh... by 1010011010 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    NTLM will help prevent your initial login credentials from being sniffed easily. But after that, everything is still in plaintext! And Windows has pretty bad packet sequencing (nmap usually says something along the lines of "trivial joke"), making insertion of data, or outright hijacking, easier.

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  82. 16,000 volts? by ecarlson · · Score: 1

    The only tube that needs 16,000 volts is a cathode ray tube (CRT, aka. picture tube, like in a TV or monitor). Anyway, it's easy to generate the 50-100v needed for the tube with a small dc-dc inverter.

    The thing I don't get is why is there only one tube? Is it a mono amplifier? Are there two tubes in the one tube casing for stereo?

    --
    - Eric, InvisibleRobot.com
  83. Is that big freakin ad part of your column or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashbloat?

  84. Obligatory pun jokes... by tcc · · Score: 3, Funny


    VACUUM tubes? isn't that the new name for Rambus memory that sucks even more?

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  85. There are low(ish) voltage tubes by name_already_taken · · Score: 1
    There are some rare tubes out there that are designed to work with plate voltages as low as 30V. They were used in portable radios.

    There is a 24V potential available on the motherboard between the +12V and -12V supplies (if PC's still have the -12V) but I don't think 24V is enough to do anything. A small inverter or charge pump along the lines of how the MAX232 works on the board would do the job too.

    There are also dual triode tubes that would take care of the stereo issue.

    That being said, I think this whole thing is a joke. If this were really an audiophile motherboard there would be a lot of metal shielding around the audio section, and the picture wouldn't look like a Fark photoshop.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  86. Physicaly, this is NOT an issue by ck42 · · Score: 1

    You have to remember guys, this is a LINE level valve amp....NOT a power amp. I have an ART DI/O(thing is about the size of a paperback book) that has a tube which runs off a meager 48V for the B+. The tube runs cool to the touch.

    So, making this tube circuit 1) work 2) stay cool 3) physically fit, is NOT an issue.

    1. Re:Physicaly, this is NOT an issue by flyneye · · Score: 1

      what a load!
      ive never encountered ANY vaccuum tube that ran cool enough that i'd wanna stick it in a tight box with a buncha stuff i was wanting to COOL anyway.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    2. Re:Physicaly, this is NOT an issue by ck42 · · Score: 1

      "Never ecountered"

      Exactly....but they do exist. Certainly there are MANY that only get warm enough to not even be considered a factor for even the most anal cooling freaks.

    3. Re:Physicaly, this is NOT an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JUst a quick comment -

      The typical computer sound card has a 1-2 WPC preamp in it, nothing more. This means the tube can easily run two channels at 2wpc in class "A" mode and still remain quite cool.

      Distortion is frankly not an issure either at these levels, but then again, it isn't for the typical SS preamp in most soundcards. Net effect - no discernable difference unless you turn the sound all the way up on the computer.

      Me? 1/3 volume into an old stereo amplifier, then into bookshelf speakers. Tubes wouldn't make this any better or worse.

  87. Wouldn't it be a better idea If .....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This idea came up in conversation a few years ago. However it involved a tube sound card (remember those) and not the mother board. Ulimately you could put the tubes outside the case.

    seems like a better idea to me ...

    How about you ?

  88. Even vs Odd Harmonics, Voltage amp vs current amp. by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Tube distortion is mostly even order harmonics. Solid state distortion is both even and odd order harmonics. Also tubes are naturally "voltage amps", transistors are naturally "current amps". Tube amps also have slewing rates that are orders of magnitude better than (bipolar) transistor amps.

  89. Expensive Tubes / Crappy Codec? by Ween · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would they go to so much trouble as to put tubes on a motherboard for quality audio output then use the super crappy Realtek ALC650 AC'97 CODEC. Maybe their engineers know something I dont, but that was a big dissapointement when I saw it.

    --


    Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:Expensive Tubes / Crappy Codec? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Doesn't ac'97 specify a 20 bit architecture for sound processing? is this not even higher than what is coming off a CD?

  90. old school by trb · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems that their server is slashdotted, perhaps it too is built using tube technology.

    1. Re:old school by octalman · · Score: 1

      Not really. It's just slow. Takes time for the filaments to heat up.

    2. Re:old school by geekoid · · Score: 2

      But if they where using tube technology, at least it would sound nice as it went down.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. Re:Even vs Odd Harmonics, Voltage amp vs current a by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    From what I distantly recall of my microelectrons course, your statement is true for BJTs (bipolar junction transistors) but not for FETs. FETs (field effect transistors) are very similar to tubes in their characteristics. Both employ an electric field to control the flow of electrons. In the case of the tube, it's from the cathode to the anode. In the case of the FET, it's from gate to drain.

    --Joe
  92. How they came up with this idea... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Sitting around one day)

    Bean counter: "You know, people are only willing to pay about $6 for a soundcard. How can we get back to the good old days when people spent great gobs of money replacing high-priced disposable components?

    Engineer: Let's stick a tube in there. Everyone likes the nice fuzzy sound that comes from tubes. Hell, that's why "Turbo Bass" and equalizers are so popular.

    Bean Counter: Sounds good, as long as we get the most outlandish design, so they can't just get parts or repairs from anywhere. We want them to come back to us.

    Engineer: Got it!

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  93. Re:TUBES ARE MEANT TO BE HOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a lot of posts withe the same thought.

    You don't want to cool down a vacuum tube, heat is essential to them working, hence the heating filament inside them. Its also why tubes have to warm-up before they are at their best.

    This should be exactly the next challenge many overclockers are looking for. How do you keep one component hot, but everything else cool, without the board dying from thermal/expansion stress?

    Have a go boys, maybe you can teach the audiophiles a lesson or two, considering the progress so far in just a few years on computer cooling.

  94. Comments in a Nutshell by Quadraphonic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    > Why?

    For the same reason some manufactures one-uped their competiors with volume controls from 0 to 11.

    > Could this give me the high quality audio I'm looking for?

    If you're looking for hi-fi (id est true to the source) sound reproduction, than no, it can't. High quality audio can not be reproduced in electrically noisy environments such as those found inside a PC case. If high quality audio were desired, one would remove all analog sound components from the computer. Obviously this would require using an external amp. (Have you ever considered why even plasitc cases have metal on the inside? Does the term "EMI shield" ring a bell?)

    It could be that you are looking for the "warm" sound delivered by tube amps. In this case a circuit could be designed to reproduce this [...] soft clipping.

    It can therefore be concluded that this is a "great gimmick to sell to idiots."

  95. I smell BS by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    There are many guitar effects, ect. out there that use a tube to sound "warmer". Crap. Gimmicks. Marketing dudes saying, "Tube amps are good, tube walkmans are better!" Blah.

    If you want real quality sound, you had better go out and get something that is made for it. This is the solution that I purchased, and it rocks. (I do not work for them, and my needs/wants may differ from yours, so YMMV.) Their soundcard is completely shielded, and silent. I love it.

    If you want "tube" warmth, go and get a real tube pre and/or amp. Tubes make a big difference, but not here.

    1. Re:I smell BS by Meowing · · Score: 1

      You do get different flavors of distorion from different amp circuits, and that's why some guitar players like to play with various flavors of tube amps. More toys, y'know?

      Funny thing is, while that guitarist is looking for mud and fuzz (that stuff the marketroids call warmth) out of those tube circuits, the golden ears think they're getting some sort of elusive added clarity (at the same time they are admitting that the old hum and what they like to call "microphoning" are present). Bizarre.

      Recently I was fixing up an old PA for a nonprofit, an ancient Western Electric amp, using what once were fairly generic 300B tubes. In the 1980s I could pick these up for $15 or so. Current price for the Westrex part? EIGHT HUNDRED FUCKING DOLLARS A PAIR. Even the clones out of Russia are a couple hundred a pop. We're not even talking about anything exotic, this tube is about as simple as they get.

      Oh, and it gets better. These people are gearing up to build essentially the same ancient PAs (in hideous new chrome cases) for EIGHT THOUSAND FUCKING DOLLARS.

      Jumping Jesus on a pogo stick, I'm in the wrong business.

  96. Re:New disk drive also in development for this boa by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1
    It's funny you mention the 5 1/4 disk drives.

    Might be a little offtopic but IIRC, didnt some people make Commodore 64 programs that would actually cause the 1541 disk drive to make music by scratching the disk and banging the heads? or am i smoking crack?

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  97. Here is a power amp made with a single 6922 by io333 · · Score: 0

    http://www.lammindustries.com/products/m2descr.htm l You don't want to know the cost, it will make your tummy hurt!

  98. minor spelling correction by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2, Funny

    As an owner of a tube headphone amplifier

    You misspelled "sucker." Hope this helps, have a nice day.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  99. Stick with a real headphone amp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Head over to Head-Fi.org where all they talk about is headphone hi-fi audio stuff. (no, they don't sell them, but at least you can find out about real headphone hi-fi)

    I mean, if you're that concerned about having quality analog audio output, you're not going to use the sound card integrated into that motherboard -- you'll just get way too much interference.

  100. The Hybrid Revolution is underway!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I have a Fender CyberTwin guitar amplifer on the way.

    The only two amps on the market combining a hybrid analog/tube/DSP design are Fender Cyber-Series and VOX Valvetronix. We can only hope someone produces a combination of Fenders preamp and interface with the VOX Valvetronix tube power amp design for the ultimate hybrid amplifier.

    This is truely the future of high-end audio manufacturing.

    1. Re:The Hybrid Revolution is underway!!! by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      A guitar amp is a different story.. the amp is part of the instrument. That's sound production, not reproduction.

  101. NOOooooooo.....! by vistic · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I own an Antique Sound Labs MG-SI15DT stereo tube amp (2x KT88 and 2x 12AX7).

    When I got it from a friend it had some nice Svetlana KT88 tubes which had a pretty hazy blue glow inside. So pretty.

    Well... I was cleaning off stuff in my room one day. And I was using windex. I guess I didnt wait too long before I had switched off my amp before I wiped stuff down because I heard a *crack*.

    Anyone ever set down a hot flask on a cold counter in science class?

    Well, I turned on my amp and a lighting storm was going off inside that tube! And it made a horrible noise. Freaky thing was my PC was turned on about 10 feet away and when I turned on my amp my computer started beeping nonstop and it froze up until I turned off my amp again.

    Some sort of freaky radiation.

    Anyway, with a crack in the glass your vacuum tube ceases to be a vacuum tube.

    I reccomend against water-cooling very strongly.

    1. Re:NOOooooooo.....! by lommer · · Score: 1

      Actually, what froze up your computer was the massive amounts of EM radiation noise coming from the arcs in you busted vacuum tube.

      Actually, if you have spare CRTs or vacuum tubes lying around one of my favorite things to do is bust them and then plug them in to watch the arcing. I first discovered this when I busted a CRT in an old monitor that I was fiddling around with. The only thing to watch out for is that you don't run them for too long and that you run them in a very non-flammable/contuctable environment where you can stand a safe distance away. If you run them for too long, they fsck up your power supply, and, well the consequences of the other precautions should be fairly obvious. :-)

    2. Re:NOOooooooo.....! by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the water cooling that cracked your tube it was the sudden, uneven temperature change that stressed the glass. Water cooled tubes are quite common and are used in high power TV, radio and radar transmitters. Some amateur radio and audio enthusiasts also water cool their tubes. The trick is to maintain a constant temperature all over the tube and don't let the water and the high voltage get together. Search google for "water cooled transmitter tube" and you'll find quite a few.

      I've been waiting for 2+ years for a transmitter tube at a local radio station to fail and be changed out so I can have the old one. It's 2 feet high and a foot diameter and it'll look impressive sitting in the corner. The station engineer promised me the last one but he broke it taking it out so now I have to wait for the next one to fail. :-(

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    3. Re:NOOooooooo.....! by vistic · · Score: 0

      oooh... i wanna see... i spend a lot of time at places like www.thetubestore.com just admiring them.

      im thinking of getting or making a nixie tube clock too.

      theyre beautiful.

  102. Power Suply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a real live audiophile with a taste twards analog reproduction/recording. Looking at the board a few questions come to mind.

    No self respecting audiophile (is this an oxymoron?) would buy a tube based system to reproduce op-amp created sound. And while the sources for sound may have been carefully recorded with state of the art analog equipment, it is a certainty that they were not stored in this fashion.
    Next is the question of power. I am certain that that PC power supply is adequate for reproducing MP3's on soundblaster cards. However, again, tubes are usually accompanied by well engineered power supplies with very large transformers. This equipment is absent from the motherboard.
    Isolation of signals is vital in tube gear. Shielding a tube from outside electrical signals is difficult. Higher frequency signals are more difficult to shield from in general due to the fact that they implicitly are higher energy. Most audiophile grade tubes are designed to run in systems that produce very lower power, lower frequency signals, the exact opposite is found on a computer.

    If this PC is not a hoax, which it most likely is, then it appears to be a very ill-concieved product which I doubt will find a niche.

  103. Re:w00t by satterth · · Score: 1

    Here is a close up picture of the tube as taken @ Computex

    http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTAyMzE0 MT M4MmFRVDh6SHlEY0xfMV8xNV9sLmpwZw==

    --
    Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  104. Re:New disk drive also in development for this boa by jpmkm · · Score: 2

    what is even funnier is that cds are digital and lps are analog

  105. Interesting? by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
    OK, I'm complaining about moderation quite a bit today, it seems... This IS funny though.

    Analog computing DOES have a lot of uses, but it needs vacuum tubes about as much as bicycles need wood.

    These (LM741) do the job in an all-solid state way (you can, of course, use any op-amp you desire). Connect them with 4066's and you have your reprogrammable analog computer. Better yet, this can be built on an IC, and programmed just like an FPGA. In fact, Lattice and a few others make chips just like this.

    Analog computers are terrific for mathematic problems where an exact numerical answer is not as important as getting a good answer quickly. It really is too bad that they've fallen out of favor as of late.

  106. This could actually be dangerous... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    I've been bitten by the plate supply on a number of tube devices, including an HF transmitter. It's no fun! In fact, the last one to get me literally bounced me across the room and left a burn on my arm.

    I would be concerned about the "Joe Consumer" level of do-it-yourself folks, many of whom have probably never even HEARD of vacuum tubes, who misplace a screw or washer or something and, in doing so, manage to short the plate supply (which has got to be up around 300 VDC) to ground or to one of the low-voltage DC lines. I hope AOpen has got some enormous warning labels pasted all over this thing.

    Another thing to consider, along those lines. How many of us have accidentally dropped a screw, or similar metallic object, into a computer while it's being worked on under power? If you're really lucky, the screw won't bridge anything when it falls, AND you'll see where it lands. If you're not so lucky, well...

    I think anyone who wants to build a system using one of these boards should be required to take at least a couple of hours training on basic electronics safety, whether self-taught or in a class. Lord knows nobody reads manuals any more, so putting nine kinds of bright red 'CAUTION!' flag in the book isn't going to do any good at all.

    On a final note: I, like others who have posted already, just don't see the point of doing something like this. If you're enough of an audiophile to be a fan of Truly Great Sound, you're not going to use a PC to get it. You're going to run out and get a nice old Carver (or similar) tube-based amp from wherever one gets such things these days, and hitch it up to a real hi-fi system.

    Don't even get me started on running tube amps on switch-mode power supplies. The output filtering on said supply would have to be pretty amazing to keep the RF hash that any switcher generates out of the speakers.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  107. ACtually good? by gotak · · Score: 1

    The only time i got to listen to a tube amp was at the ECE open house day at my uni.

    It was playing from a cd out to some nice headphones. The thing is it had this annonying quite loud white noise. I didn't find it impressive at all.

  108. The Harsh Breath of REALITY by flyneye · · Score: 1

    now with all preferences to earthy clipping or steeley quantizing and unfounded fears of vaccuum tubes aside;I and I the flyneye,who not only owns
    tube audio sources,but have also built them from parts,can tell you certainly in this self referencial run on sentence,that only one thing is truely horribly wrong with this board,"vaccuum tubes are more f*&king heat than i care to introduce into a cramped space with any expen$ive sensitive electronics that i am trying desperatly to cool for purposes of longevity and performance".'smuch too hot folks
    (try saying all that in one breath like jack webb on dragnet!)

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  109. Single tube stereo- by rMortyH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey-
    Like IC's, there are usually more than one device in a single package with tubes. We're probably looking at a dual triode. Could (should) be quad triode, but I seriously doubt it.

    It's never gonna sound much better than the D/A, which is probably a runofthemill 44.1k by 16bit job, which just isn't all that great, especially with only one triode per channel instead of two.

    SO it's a sales gimmick. But, it's a DAMN GOOD ONE and I'd like to see more of this and I think it will succeed as it should!

    More crap like this, please! Give me swing meters and magic-eyes and nixies! Bring it on!

    =Rich

  110. Are you really serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell me you aren't.

    1. Re:Are you really serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably was, but that just means he doesn't know how a transistor works.

    2. Re:Are you really serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he wasn't serious at all and was just making a joke.

  111. Re:yea well... by zapfie · · Score: 1

    Shut up already, nobody cares.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  112. Re:New disk drive also in development for this boa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, but you'd only want to run it on someone elses' 1541. someone you don't like that is.

  113. PCI? by Perdo · · Score: 2

    I can see it now:

    Soundblaster Fried! X-audiophile

    or a new port instead of AGP, you can have AAP (Accellerated Audio Port) or a sound card that uses the AGP Port for audio while video is relegated to the PCI bus. I think ATI might like this last option since they still make PCI versions of their cards while Nvidia is exclusively AGP.

    Speaking of which.. Can the AGP port be used for applications other than video? Could a 10 gigabit NIC use the AGP bus? 16 channel input 144khz audio A/D converter card? What other applications could use a 2034Mb/s 8x AGP bus where 64 bit 66mhz PCI's 533Mb/s and PCI-X's 1024Mb/s fails?

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  114. And in other audiophile news... by marhar · · Score: 2

    CDR Sound Review tells us how various brands of CDRs stack up for different types of music:
    "Maxell 700 MB silver top for more detailed highs, Maxell Music gold for a fatter, more solid mid-to-bottom."

    1. Re:And in other audiophile news... by platypus · · Score: 1

      amazing link, thanks alot - meanwhile I'm going to clean my keyboard and monitor

    2. Re:And in other audiophile news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I would agree on is the difference between burning at 1x, 2x, etc for audio cds'. Why? Because it seems a number of audio players (car decks in particular) have a hard time reading the tracks accurately. Otherwise I think that site is hilarious.

    3. Re:And in other audiophile news... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Someone forgot to tell the guy that the color is totally irrelevant, and has nothing to do with the recording surface where the laser actually works.

  115. Ah, I get it now! by kfg · · Score: 2

    Forgive me for a momentary metal denseness.

    You are laboring under the misaprehension that I'm a punk kid who just posted a mindless anti Apple computer crack intending to imply that a Machintosh isn't a "real" computer.

    Far from it, if I had been I couldn't have posted what I did in the manner that I did.

    You see, I neglected to take into account that many of the more "youthful" of the /. audience wouldn't be aware of just what a Macintosh really IS and that if there were no such thing as a Macintosh computer I *still* would have made my orginal post, which would have still made sense.

    Macintosh, as it happens, was a, ( some would say THE), premier manufacturer of tube amplifiers for commercial and audiophile customers, as much a household word in their day as Teac is now.

    My orginal post was intended as a somewhat wry and yes, ironic, comment on the convergence of "media devices," hightened somewhat by the fact that there are audiophile tube amplifiers AND sophisticated home computers named Macintosh.

    In my own home the "stereo" and "TV" sit in the corners acting mostly as dustcollectors, as I use my "computer" for nearly everything, including as a "radio" and "tape deck."

    *Ironicly* I'm posting using Windows right now because my Mac isn't connected to the network at the moment and my Linux X-server has crashed and I'm not in the mood to reconfigure everything to make one post using Lynx.

    So, anyway, if I'm guilty of anything it's of being too opaque in my reference and too dense to realize it.

    Hell, as implied above I *use* a Mac, ( and used to use a Mac).

    KFG

  116. Interesting case mod for this tube ... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 2
    take the tube off of the MOBO ... and wire the socket that is left to a new socket on the top of the case.

    When the audio is working ... it'll make the computer look like it's thinking ... (lightbulb glowing)

    :)

    --
    Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  117. Pointless. Just use digital output. by TheLink · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's probably a joke. And will be a bigger one if anyone buys into it.

    As far as I know, most music/sound stored on a PC is digital not analog.

    So if you are an audiophile and somehow still want to pay extra to have better stuff coming out of your computer just use digital sound outputs (some soundcards have these) and use external DACs of your choice. And then the output from those DACs can go to whatever amplifier/preamp you like - tube, transistor etc.

    As for the DVD/CDROM drive's analog sound output - you don't want to use that - the drive probably has a cheap DAC (might be ok for people like me, but I'm sure those with golden ears won't be satisfied). So rip your CDs a few times to get as correct data as you can get, and use that. If after a few rips the data is still inconclusive (or conclusively bad), get a new CD.

    Cheerio,
    Link.

    --
  118. ObRef to The D by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    It seems that their server is slashdotted, perhaps it too is built using tube technology.

    JB: "Get the scientists ... working on the tube technology, immediately."

    KG: "Tube technology..."

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  119. Single tube... power amplifier? by dybdahl · · Score: 1

    Nobody addresses the fact that tubes are usually used for power amplifiers, not preamplifiers. Why would anyone use a power amplifier inside a PC? A good power amplifier weighs at least 4kg and doesn't fit into a PC case.

  120. Am I on the wrong board? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider myself one of those nerds to which a mobo with tube amp is stuff that matters and the related discusion is +5 informative... But how come everyone is arguing wheiter or not the product manager at aopen had a good right idea depending on wheiter tube amps are indeed better (my opinion, if its actually debatable then they are not worth their price). This discusion goes as deep as this part by mesocyclone(I am sure someone double checked those numers even before having breakfast, am I right ?)

    This leaves the obious questions one trusts to find on /. undebated like:
    - A board aimed at the hardware/audio "maniac" rather average overclocker for the pentium iv????(powerpc,athlon or crusoe would be my choice)
    - Does it run linux?? ,yes every intel chipset currently in production works nice
    - Imagene a beowulf of these!

  121. Re:My dad says... [OT] by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

    I really wanted to take your post seriously, that is until I read the word "audiophiles". Audiophiles, i.e. morons who buy pure silver speaker cables and special sound-improving lotions to bathe their CDs in (I'm not kidding) at horrendous prices can't possibly be taken seriously.

    Despite being completly off-topic (and also not being an audiophile) your description of Audiophiles would sit right next to my description of many Gaming enthusiasts / overclocker, who would spend $700 on a video card to give an extra 20fps (total of 150fps) on their 80hz monitor. Or even better someone who would spend even more on a liquid cooled case in order to overclock a cpu to give a 3% real performance increase!

    Of course im not implying you are such a person, just that in every 'hobby' there are such extremes that people will go to for probably not a lot of good reasons! :)

  122. tubes on m/b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a real (yes I went to recording engineering school) audio engineer working in the industry, I think this is a tremendous idea. Tubes have a wonderful warm sound to take the harsh edge of digital recordings. I haven't destroyed my ears listening to music too loudly and I'm just shy of 19khz in both ears and I'm 36. I can hear the difference between tube and transistor amps. I'll pickup a couple in my studio for listening to mixdowns for my clients, as sometimes musicians can be the real music snobs.

    Kudo's to aopen

  123. Switched power supplies are fine. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    "... while simultaneous wondering about the ability of a switched psu to properly drive a tube amplification stage cleanly."

    This shows ignorance of electronics. (No problem, everyone is ignorant of something.) If "psu" means "power supply unit", there is no problem. Switched power supplies output constant DC that is indistinguishable from the DC from transformer-rectifier-capacitor supplies, if both are regulated equally well.

    The old style supplies sometimes had huge capacitors that would provide energy for peaks in the output of power amplifiers. Switched power supplies could use huge capacitors for the same purpose, but in practice it is easier just to design the supply so it can provide all the power needed for the peaks.

    1. Re:Switched power supplies are fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that they are indistinguishible is not true for all frequencies. At audible frequencies it probably is true cause I'm pretty sure switching supplies probably switch well above audible ranges. However, when you get up into higher frequencies the fact that the supply is switching instead of linear will show up in the spectrum of the signals, even with large capacitors. In high dynamic range applications this can be quite bad.

    2. Re:Switched power supplies are fine. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


      In a well-designed system, this should not be true. Switching power supplies switch at 100,000 Hz typically, or above.

      It is important that the high-power system be isolated from the low-level signals.

  124. time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its time we started to talk about jesus

  125. Re:Pointless. Just use digital output. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people rip their CDs using Digital Audio Extraction tools (such as AudioGrabber or EAC) which does not touch any D/A converters. This software takes the digital information in a fashion close to reading a CD-ROM Data disc, and sorts it into a proper WAV file which is then repurposed by the audio encoder of choice. The only time when the D/A converters on the drive is invoked is when they press play on their CD Playing application. Also note that from Windows 2000 onwards, the operating system will allow the user to play music digitally in the same manner as ripping an audio CD, bypassing the D/A converter on the drive and merely allowing the sound card to convert the signal or to send it out through a digital connector.

  126. Big joke. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    It all seems like a big joke to me.

    It goes with 100 to 1 data compression and electronic super cooling.

    There are people who like science, but don't particularly want to know anything about it.

  127. Don't be a player hater by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    who would spend $700 on a video card to give an extra 20fps (total of 150fps) on their 80hz monitor.

    Nice try but the fps plays an intrinsic part of the control system, it's proportional to the latency. At lower fps the machine cannot respond to mouse events as soon. So having a high FPS is a metric to how well the machine will respond overall.

    Also, people use FPS in Quake3 as a guide. Okay one can say 'I got 3547' on 3dMark but Quake3 fps is something people can directly understand. Remember that play many games and not just Quake3. For instance I just got a GeForce4 ti4600. I get 220 fps in Quake3 (@1280x1024x32 :) with the default config but in Dungeon Siege I get 10fps @ 1024x768x32.

    I've never heard of anyone spending $700 for 20fps! (but that's not to say it's impossible)

    As for liquid cooled, if I could be arsed/afford it I'd buy it and take a 3% performance *decrease* just to show it to people at LAN parties.

    Don't be a player hater. The world would be a sadder place if people didn't play.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Don't be a player hater by DuranDuran · · Score: 1
      > Worst Episode Ever, ATOC is.

      Displeased, Yoda would be, at your incorrect acronym. AOTC, I think you mean.

      DD

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Don't be a player hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :) tnx

  128. Here's the detailed info by Syre · · Score: 1


    SAN JOSE, CA, June 3, 2002 -- AOpen Inc. announced today that it is introducing the world's first vacuum tube motherboard, coinciding with Intel's announcement of the Pentium® 4 845E chipset. The new AX4B-533Tube Motherboard incorporates the novel, modern-day adoption of an idea that was spawned by the invention of the electric light bulb by Thomas A. Edison back in 1879 - the vacuum tube. In taking this bold step towards audio perfection, AOpen's hybrid AX4B-533Tube unquestionably is targeted to a very exclusive niche market - passionate audiophiles and extreme gamers who are interested in building their own ultimate entertaining PCs. The motherboard is also certain to appeal to retailers that desire to cater to these two eccentric groups with custom-built PCs, delivered with matching speaker systems and the latest CD and DVD playback devices.

    Why The Vacuum Tube?
    The first logical question anyone - analyst, journalist, technician or consumer - would likely ask, is . . . why? AOpen engineers admit that their original notion to add the unmistakable sound of tube output to a modern-day motherboard was initially a lark. "We were all together late one night, kicking around lots of crazy ideas when I proposed it would be really cool if we could combine the warmth and depth - tonal realism, if you will - of the sound produced by an audio tube, with one of our state-of the-art motherboards" says Al Peng, product manager at AOpen America Inc., an audiophile for more than 10 years. "Laughter turned into raves a few months later when we did our first lab demo of our unique hybrid creation. The reproduced sound was absolutely amazing.

    It left everyone stunned. What we realized at that moment was how the limitations of typical audio output from a PC as we knew it, had come to an end - and what we were pioneering was a way to literally combine the best of two audio worlds - old and new."

    The Watts and Volts of Combining Solid-State and Tube
    Some skeptics may argue that even average solid-state amplification devices are often better than the best tube devices. However, in terms of tonality - that's where solid-state working alone falls short. Since the tube output stage of the AX4B-533Tube couples the two front digital stereo output channels with tube output, music lovers of all kinds will "feel" their singer, band or orchestra seemingly come alive, while gamers will find that sound-effects become far more convincing and "to your face". A brief look at what makes a tube work provides greater perspective to the overall concept of combining tube with solid-state.

    There are four principal elements in a modern vacuum tube that work together to make it function. The Filament (heater), Cathode, Grid and Anode (or plate). The filament is connected with voltage to boils the cathode, causing the cathode to emit electrons that pass through the grid and hit the Anode. Through this electron flow, the tube amplifies a small (AC) alternating current signal into a larger AC voltage, thereby amplifying it. By controlling the grid voltage, the current flow can be regulated, and create the desired electronic characteristics, while amplifying the signal (source).

    Tubes may date back to well over 100 years, but the AX4B-533Tube proves that even today, tubes shape the sound of many modern bands' characteristic styles. In fact, most electric guitar and bass amplifiers are tube-based. High-end professional audio equipment also relies on the tube as a preferred amplification device. Tubes are even found in digital-to-analog conversion equipment.

    Some Technical Considerations

    *

    SWITCHING POWER One of the more daunting challenges for AOpen engineering team in developing the AX4B-533Tube was the process of powering the tube circuitry that requires high voltage of up to 300V from the power supply to properly operate the tube. By incorporating a switching mode power supply for the tube circuitry that can truly rival solid-state amplifiers, then employing A Maxim 668 DC-DC voltage converter to provide ample voltage for the tube to function under optimal conditions - correct audio playback is achieved. As a result, the AX4B-533Tube performs brilliantly.
    *

    TUBE CIRCUITRY After careful study of many classic pre-amp circuits, AOpen decided to employ a single dual-triode (one tube with two front stereo channels) as the main amplification device. In addition, by following a long path to achieve signal amplification, straightforward amplification is achieved without the use of numerous coupling devices that could add unwanted coloration to the sound of the playback output.
    A separate input connector is also provided allowing users with existing sound card's output going through the tube amplification to achieve desire tube tonality. This design allows millions of users out there with their existing sound card to be working with AX4B-533Tube in tandem.
    *

    NOISE REDUCTION One of the inherent difficulties of utilizing tubes for audio output amplification has always been the dreadful by-product of noise. AOpen solved this problem flawlessly with a method of noise reduction called the Frequency Isolation Wall (FIW). The FIW is strategically placed at all regions throughout the motherboard that separates each operating frequency regions such as CPU, memory, AGP and PCI where the operating frequency ranging from 133MHz, 66MHz and 33MHz. Cross talk among each regions had been reduced greatly for overall system stability as well as minimize inherit noise that may go to tube amplification circuitry.
    *

    RELIABILITY A critical issue with any electronic device is reliability. When it comes to hybrid audio equipment, reliability plays an even greater role. The MTBF ratios for both the motherboard and the tube circuitry in the AX4B-533Tube are stellar, with minimum 50,000 MTBF hours on the motherboard, and 35,000 MTBF hours on the tube circuitry (Tube itself will have about 4,000 to 5,000 hours, depends on operating conditions)
    *

    COMPONENTS AND CONSTRUCTION To ensure accurate tonal quality for music playback and to fully enhance the gaming experience, AOpen engineers meticulously selected the finest components from the world's top-rated manufacturers in designing and building the AX4B-533Tube. In addition, the AX4B-533Tube is painstakingly and patiently assembled, piece-by-piece, then fully inspected and individually tested by AOpen technicians to ensure that each motherboard meets its desired peak performance levels without hesitation.

    The AX4B-533Tube Motherboard comes with latest Intel 845E chipset design and features DDR SDRAM memory channels delivering 2.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth to the processor - maximizing the full performance of the Intel Pentium® 4 processor with 533Mhz FSB offers best overall performance and longevity. It comes with a 4X AGP slots; with new ICH4, the AX4B-533Tube supports 4 ports of USB 2.0 and Ultra ATA/100 interface. With Intel 845E chipset, AOpen's AX4B-533Tube provides a revolutionary fusion of old and new technology, producing unsurpassed PC audio output that takes full advantage of the Intel Pentium® 4 processor's capabilities.

    Audio grade components are used throughout critical circuitry. By cooperating with Reliable Capacitors, high-end Rel MultiCap coupling capacitors were used. Cardas wires are also deployed strategically on the output to achieve faithful reproduction of music and sound effect. (Fred, We need to expand this portion a bit. Please visit www.capacitors.com and www.cardas.com for more information to emphasize the value we are providing to the gamers and music lovers. Thanks)

    The AX4B-533Tube has an estimated street price of $215 USD and fully supports ACPI 1.0 and APM 1.2 specs; comes bundled with Norton Anti-Virus 2002 software; and features AOpen's standard three-year warranty. The AX4B-533Tube is available through all authorized AOpen channel partners. Detailed specifications and photos for website posting or publication are also available by request. More information on the AX4B-533Tube may also be found at: product spec.

    About AOpen
    AOpen Inc. is the world's largest total component solutions manufacturer and a member of a $10 billion technology group. Leveraging more than 25 years of technology
    manufacturing experience and more than 1,000 Group patents, AOpen designs, develops and markets advanced PC motherboards, notebooks, optical drives, PC housings, peripherals, multimedia, telecommunications and networking solutions for resellers, system integrators and those who value reliability and performance.

    Editor's Note: More information about AOpen, AOpen products, services, and business partners is available on the World Wide Web at: www.AOpen.com.

    AOpen is a registered trademark of AOpen Inc. All other products, brand names or companies are trademarks or registered marks of their respective companies.

  129. Correctomundo! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    Sound cards need to have digital output, so that we can hook our computer into our THX-compliant monster system.

    Seriously, though, an external DAC unifies the sound from your DVD, MD and PC.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  130. Rock on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice thing to put on my guitar!!! :-p

    HEAVY METAL!!!!!!!!!!!!

  131. A PC box is the worst place for audio of any kind by pato+perez · · Score: 1

    It's kinda cool that they're making such a strong pro-tube statement, but really: What a lame-ass idea! Regardless of which side of the argument you fall on, whether tubes are the way to go or not, it doesn't make any sense to have *any* analog audio sources inside an inherently em-noisy box. If you want high fidelity, (or you just wanna be able to crank it), you've gotta have digital output and perform the digital-to-analog conversion outside the box. That's what the pros and serious amateurs do. Forget stinkin' soundblatters! Digital io cards and standalone a-d-a converters are the only serious way to go. What you do with the sound after conversion to analog is up to you. I'm personally kinda fond of the sound of tube amps but that's besides the point. I don't want a couple inside my pc given the heat that those tubes generate. The last place I need more heat is inside my pc!

  132. Re:New disk drive also in development for this boa by Beowulfs_Ghost · · Score: 1

    I had a program for the C64 called, "The 1541 Sings".

    I would bang stuff around in the drive and produce a noice that sounded something like "Danny Boy".

    Why 5 1/4 bays reminded you of that is beyond me, as these drives where the size of a shoe box.

    --
    Silence is Foo!
  133. MAudio plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want good audio get a nice soundcard with a breakout box. Like the MAudio Delta series. There is Linux drivers for the thing as well (both OSS/pay-us and ALSA, I think the OSS stuff works better). All this tube nonsense.

  134. But they love it ! by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Pedantic self proclaimed audiophiles LOVE crappy sound ! They love crappy vinyl ! They love stupid analog tube amplifiers ! If engineers were to develop the same mobo, but without the EMI issue and the fan noise, they would complain that the sound is Trop artificiel.

  135. Harmonica Lewinski's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it it true, even order harmonics sound rich and full, odd order harmonics sound dead and lifeless. Solid state devices will always produce shitty harmonics. Tubes are analog, and just like your ear, are what we hear best. Once again Slashdot folks are Blowing Goats(tm). Audio, audio and more audio. People that think they are getting good sound out of digital stuff, are deaf to certain frequencies. DEAF.

  136. Re:My dad says... [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the point to be had here is that with gamers/overclockers you at least get a performance increase. Tube amps not only cost more, but add distortion to the sound, making them inferior by the definition of hi-fi.

  137. Audiophile DirectSound by Seska · · Score: 1

    As a game programmer, I look forward to the changes coming for DirectSound: CreateSnobbyAudiophileDirectSoundBuffer().

  138. You're on to something by Susky · · Score: 1

    I noticed that if I load Doom onto my machine from different download sources, the creatures actually look different! And the flaming skulls just aren't as "crisp" if I save the distribution for more than a week.

  139. EXACTLY! by Susky · · Score: 1

    There is so much friggin' voodoo science in the audio biz (both pro audio AND home audio) that it isn't funny. But it's such a metaphysical battle that those who try to use REAL science and common sense need not apply.

  140. Re:Ahhh... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The NTLM authentication is susceptable to dictionary attacks like any other hash. But like you said... it prevents credentials from being sniffed easily

    There was an advisory about a year ago where they found out that by tricking IE or Outlook into activating a telnet:// URL, they could have a Win2k system automatically send the hash of the userid and credentials for the current logged on user.

  141. CD Player in BIOS by p3d0 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Now this is cool:
    Another interesting software feature that will be shipped with the board is CD Player software. While this does not seem to be anything new, AOpen's solution can run the CD player without booting into a Windows OS. The CD Player loads immediately after the BIOS.
    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:CD Player in BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My computer can play CD's, MP3's, DVD's, surf the internet, etc. without booting into a Windows OS. What's so new about that?

  142. Audiophiles, do a blind test by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    "I use my PC for everything, including sound that would even be pleasing to audiophiles who didn't know where it was coming from" (italics mine). That last bit is quite telling. If you have a friend who is an audiophile, do a few tests with him!

    Audiophiles usually have good hearing, and they can tell the difference between the sound color produced by two different amps. Do a blind test with your audiophile friend and a couple of high end and mid-range amps/speakers, and ask him to give each a rating. At some point throw your computer into the mix and see what rating it gets. I got my speakers from a shop that works like this: they let you hear the speakers first and ask which ones you preferred, and only then did they start to talk prices. You'll find that the audiophile often will not pick out the most ridiculously priced equipment as "best".

    Oh and don't get me started on cabling. Show me the person who can justify (or distinguish in a blind test), the $500 cinch leads to connect equipment, or the $150-a-meter loudspeaker cable, as opposed to a good $20 cinch lead and simple LS cable.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Audiophiles, do a blind test by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Yup.
      Because many audiophlies have average hearing.
      If anything, they may be a bit more practiced.

      THe mind is a powerful thing. It's hard to listen to two pieces of equipment and compare fairly if you know that one is supposed to be better. The mind plays tricks.

      And regarding cabling...

      Those audiophiles who blow amazing amounts of cash on their setups often have far better equpimetn than the sound engineer who produced the album in the first place. Now, given that, what is it exactly that they are trying to reproduce exactly? The mastering engineer's equipment? You can't, you don't know what it was.
      The original performance? YOu can't, the mastering engineer has already tweaked the recording repeatedly to get it so it sounds the way HE wants it to sound on average equipment.

    2. Re:Audiophiles, do a blind test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a true audiophile would never agree to a blind a/b/x test in the first place. we all know its bunk, see.
      if youre gonna spend $X000 on a piece of equpment, 5 minutes of in-store listening is worthless. weeks of listening in your HOME SYSTEM would be more appropriate.

    3. Re:Audiophiles, do a blind test by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      Well, I bet audiophiles probably run a spectrum rather than be fit into a neat little category. There are smart ones that let their ears do the listening and then there are ones that will pay more simply because they are told that it is better by a salesman or an ad.

      I don't think I'm an audiophile, but I generally demand something just a bit better than what Best Buy offers for speakers and the reciever. I ended up getting a speaker set that was the cheapest that the hi-fi store sold, and quite frankly I haven't been let down, either in the listen test or at home.

  143. could not be a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can easily power the plate with a dc-dc converter.

    and tubes are more reliable than most people think, they will usually last a good five years, or even longer if handled very carefully and not power cycled everyday.

    many people like the fuzzy sound of tubes, although they could just route the card through their favorite amp.

    as for the problems i'm not sure an atx supply to have enough current to light the heater filament.

    the heat from the tube could easily match the heat output of an athlon

    i doubt the tube would survive a usps shipping

    and more people wil make even more of those stupid window mods.

  144. Re:Ahhh... by sjlutz · · Score: 1

    Because we all know that it couldn't be the developer's fault or anything like that. Blame Microsoft? No.. blame the developer first.

  145. Small point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The amp company is "McIntosh", not "Macintosh".

    I still use a 29 year old McIntosh.

    1. Re:Small point by geekoid · · Score: 2

      because, if its not Scottish, it's CRAP!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  146. Re:Can you explain this to me ... by markhb · · Score: 2

    • How exactly is a *VACUUM* supposed to conduct heat??

    • You've clearly never seen a vacuum tube device in operation.


    Not to mention, lived on a planet heated by a star which is c. 92 million miles of near-vacuum away.
    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
  147. Beowulf Cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these badboys...

  148. Thanks for propagating the myth. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Look. For a guitar amp, I can see it.. the tube amp is as much part of the insturment as the guitar. It definately does mess with the sound.

    How ever, as with many things that 'audiophiles' think, tube amps are NOT better than solid state at reproducing sound. Tubes mess with the sound. Yes, they sound good. But not as accurate as a good solid state amp.

    Now, I'm not saying there aren't extremely high quality tube amps.. there are. But companies make these things so they can sell them at rediculous prices to audiophiles who mistakenly think tube amps are more accurate.

    Guess what. The recording engineer who mastered the thing didn't use a tube amp.

  149. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just us a tube based external amp?
    Why put a tube in your case?

  150. Forget the tube, did you notice the caps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who think this is a joke, did you notice the big white things attached to the motherboard? Those are Hovalland cpacitors; very expensive (US$4 apiece vs US$0.10 for standard el-cheapo) audiophile caps designed to sound better than your average cap. (Yes, capacitors DO sound different)

    I couldn't see the ratings from the picutres, but they're about the right size for coupling the output from a triode like the 6922 (Russian 6DJ8 nockoff). And I saw a third, but smaller, Hovalland that is probably a low value bypass cap for that 400V Japanese electrolytic pictured.

    As far as I can see from the pictures, we have a pretty classic tube pre-amp circuit with top quality caps.

  151. huh? by epiphani · · Score: 1
    But then, audiophiles also buy gigantic cables because they imagine that their speakers will sound better attached to them... etc.

    They will. Audiophiles buy gigantic cables for two reasons:

    • The magnetic interference from electrical current running anywhere near the wires will distort the signal. If you're familiar with car audio, think alterator whine in your speaker. (That can also be due to a bad ground on one of your amplifiers, but there are a billion things that can cause it.) Bigger cable are better insulated against these things.
    • If you want minimal distortion, that means providing sufficiant power to the speaker. The bigger the speaker wire, the more power you can shove through it without melting it.

    You have to understand, distortion isnt confined to the amplifiers. Speaker distortion works like this...

    For the sake of simplicity, imagine a perfect sine wave. It goes as much up as it does down. Speakers do exactly the same thing as the wave, moving back and forth. Now, when you're doing this at any significant amplitude, theres issues of air pressure to take into account. You've got the forward push which creates a vacuum behind the speaker, and higher pressure in front of the speaker. Since the higher pressure in front usually disapates forward, you've really only gotta worry about the vacuum behind the speaker.

    Now, moving on to the second half of the wave, that vacuum behind the speaker has air very quickly rushing to fill that space. As a result, on the back swing of the wave, you require a lot of power to fight against the incoming wave of air.

    At about 160db, its phyically impossible to have sound without distortion (half the wave is flattened out!).

    So yah.. 'gigantic cables' accually do make the speakers sound better. (If you like it loud.)

    --
    .
    1. Re:huh? by mesocyclone · · Score: 2
      A comment... The magnetic interference will be the same regardless of the size of the wire (within limits). So larger wire has no effect on that interference.

      As far as supplying power to the speakers, you simply need wire large enough to carry the peak currents, and low enough resistance that the impedance (hopefully resistive) of the speaker is quite low compared to the resistance of the wire. However, even if this is not the case, you do not increae the distortion (as long as the amplifier is not mismatched), but rather simply reduce some of the power available to the speaker which does not produce distortion, but rather produces simply slightly less power. Everything else you say about speakers is simply irrelevant.

      Thus if you are running, say, 1000 watts RMS (enough to break your ears easily), and the speakers are 4 ohm impedance, you have an average current of 16 amperes. This current is easily carried by normal house wiring for a hundred feet! So no problem with the wire melting.

      Now, to make sure you don't loose a significant amount of power to resistive heating in the wire, let's say that you are willing to sacrifice only 1/10th then you need the resistance of the wire to be less than 1/10th the equivalent resistance of the amplifier - i.e. you need it to be less that .4 ohm. If your wire is 20 feet long, then it can be as small as 19 gauge (convenient, since you need 18 gauge wire to carry 16 amps without getting too hot). So by this analysis, 18 gauge (smaller than "zip" cord - extension cord - wire).

      Another reason that you failed to mention is the impedance of the wire. If the wire is not purely resistive, it will cause a rolloff with frequency - the pwr to the speakers will decline with frequency. Here is a table showing the rolloff at 30KHz for a 20 foot cable of varying widths:

      Wire Gauge ... Diameter inches ... Rolloff at 30 KHz(dB
      ?... 10 ... 1.8dB
      ?... 2 ... 2.18dB
      1... .29 ... 2.5dB
      10... .1 ... 2.7dB
      18... .04 ... 2.9dB

      Finally! An effect that we can measure of small wire. But note: with a wire 3 inches (!) in diameter, you have almost as significant rolloff as you do with a wire of .04 inches in diameter. Not a major effect, in other words.

      But... if you really care about the difference in rolloff between 1.8dB and 2.9dB, you are much better off with 10" WIDE cable than big fat cables.

      Of course, a much simpler and perfectly adequate approach to this is to use an equalizer (very simple in this case) to compensate for the inductive rolloff.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

  152. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "Dobbs", not "Dob".

    Remember--it ain't a prob if you've got Bob!

    1. Re:Your sig by flyneye · · Score: 1

      yeah it usta be until slashdot shortened my sig over time
      im just too damn lazy to change it so get slack

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  153. It's not a hoax... by HardCase · · Score: 2
    Chrisd's right on about the power supply, valves have pretty demanding power requirements, and the voltage is much higher (300+ volts is typical) than what's normally present in a PC.


    It really wouldn't be much of a problem to step up the voltage to 180v-300v. Obviously there wouldn't be a tremendous amount of current, but since this tube is designed to drive the output of a preamplifier, little current is required.


    Also, most tube amps require output transformers, which is noticably absent from the photo.


    There are scads of output transformerless (OTL) amps on the market. They're designed to drive low impedance loads. Even so, this is a preamplifer, so it will be driving a relatively high impedance, thus no output transformer is required.


    Thirdly, there's only one tube! Presumably, if they are really after the audiophile market, it would at least be a stereo amplifier.


    This is a dual triode tube, perfectly suited for stereo. As I recall, it would work great as a common-cathode amplifier.



    Not to say anything about the noise problems present near high speed digital circuits.


    That's where I'd be concerned. I think that this is really nothing more than a gimmick. I suppose they can say that it's aimed at audiophiles, but in reality I think that its true market will be for the case modding crowd to take advantage of the "gee whiz" factor.


    This is bunk.


    Never underestimate the power of a marketing department.


    -h-

  154. And to this high-end audiophile equipment... by germinatoras · · Score: 1

    ...the users will attach their 2-watt, 3-inch no-name-brand computer speakers?

  155. Saw it also at NTCW by Papineau · · Score: 1

    Saw it in the frontpage of NTCW, which is a retailer in the Vancouver area. Looks like it's more solid than it first appeared...

  156. Ah.. but that's not the point. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    The point is that it has a tube on it so they can jack up the price and sell it to wannabe audiophiles for lots of greenbacks.

  157. Oh geez... by Moridineas · · Score: 2

    As an owner of a tube headphone amplifier I applaud AOpen's move to accomodate the high-end audio enthusiast

    Hooray!! You're amplifying crappy on-board audio!! But who cares, it's a TUBE AMP.

  158. Capitalizing on Nostalgia by cwilkins · · Score: 2, Funny
    The next AOpen mobo features:

    More Tubes!

    Coal Fired & Steam Powered!

    Comes in 330lb "Floor Standing Console" case, with beautiful oak finish and mother-of-perl inlay!

    Options:

    5 inch Round-Screen B&W Monitor (shipping weight: 190lbs)

    Latest High-Tech "Keypunch" style keyboard (your neighbors will hear you type)

    Mouse

    Mouse Food

    Preorder yours today!

    And remember: Real Computers Glow in the Dark! (apologies to fellow hams)
    -

    --
    -- Charlie Wilkinson Freelance Deity - Fire & Brimstone in Stock - Smiting While-U-Wait!
  159. I like tubes because... by geekoid · · Score: 2

    ...with out them, I couldn't cook my hotdog under 30 seconds.
    and I'd have to use a crappy flatscreen.(i.e. all of them).

    Not to mention, that with out them I wouldn't know that She'll give you ev'ry penny's worth
    But it will cost you a dollar first.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  160. Really. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    So you mean a computer at home is not the same as home audio...
    and you assume tht everyone hookes their compute rup to one of those subwoofer/2 tiny speakers deal?

    Interesting.

    This is not a tube amp! It's is a preamp tube.

  161. High power broadcast rigs by pyser · · Score: 1

    Nautel has been making solid-state high power AM rigs since the 1970s. They started with a 1 kW transmitter and now they make them up to 300 kW. FM up to 40 kW as well. Largely air-cooled. They are all built around hot-swappable power MOSFET modules that deliver a couple hundred watts each, fed into hybrid combiners. For more power, just build a cabinet that can hold more modules. Beauty is if you lose a module you don't go off the air, you only drop from 50 kW to 49.8 kW.

  162. Woo Hoo! LAST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you, thank you.

  163. I don't mind the heat... by JCCyC · · Score: 2

    ...because Tubes Rock!

  164. But Audiophiles like components by andreass · · Score: 1

    Seems everyone has discussed the pros and cons of tubes vs. solid state for various applications. Most audiophiles don't own a boombox, and for the same reason, would not want this piece of junk.

    Audiophile equipment is all broken out into its individual components, the higher end, the more pieces (separate pre- and power- amps, dual mono amps for driving two channels! etc.)

    So, to get great sound out of your computer, you would want to take the digital signal and run it straight to a high end D/A converter (not the cheesy crap you'll find on any retail sound card) then take that signal and put run it to your high end hi-fi system or studio monitors.

    1. Re:But Audiophiles like components by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this up, you modders. this is the crux of the matter right here.

  165. The one thing I learned from this /. post... by gosand · · Score: 2
    The one thing that I learned from the slashdot post was...

    audiophiles are DORKS! :-)

    Man, I thought some of the other discussions on here get a little in-depth sometimes, but I can't understand a damn thing that most of these people posted. Is all that crap in your heads all the time? How do you function on a daily basis, when you understand how your ear is hearing sounds at a microscopic level?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:The one thing I learned from this /. post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya!, No one seems to care that they are only buying half a board to get a tube. Where'd all the pci slots go? i want room for more components not less. only 3 pci slots kill the expandability. Sounds like a fancy mp3 player to me.

    2. Re:The one thing I learned from this /. post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just fine, thanks for asking!
      Oh, wait, you called me a dork! Now,now, theres no need for this to get ugly, lets just calmly....WHAM! SHASAM! TAKE THAT YOU DAMN PUSSY.
      WHAM! AND THAT! AND YO MAMA TOO!

      On a serious note, slashdotters arent audiophiles, they just think they are. Witch makes them really annoying.

    3. Re:The one thing I learned from this /. post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scratch that. slashdotters think they know better than audiophiles, witch make them REALLY REALLY anoying.

  166. LP-ROM by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    The music industry is likely to squash any attempts to create or market an LP-ROM. Check out this site.

  167. to those wondering what kind of tube it takes... by vistic · · Score: 0

    This is the exact tube they show in the pictures at HardOCP: a Sovtek 6922.

  168. what about the lack of board? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This tube stuff is all fun and good.(I guess) but what about sacraficing half a motherboard for some breakable sound stuff? Where the hell did all the pci slots go. My six are already full. i pick one up by tossing a sound card. I want More not less.

  169. Re: anode voltages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The high voltage anode supply is not a given. Many aircraft receivers were designed to use the 28V battery supply on the tube anodes, specifically to avoid the need for a vibrator or motor driven HV supply (big, noisy, unreliable...). The tubes don't deliver as much power that way, but they do work (especially some types intended for such use).

  170. Re:TUBES ROCK!!! the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and there is a shirt to prove it.....

    http://www.geekculture.com/geekculturestore/webs to re/tubesrock.html

  171. Totally cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, this is the best motherboard I have never seen! Now if only the server would stop timing out, I might actually be able to look at the veebeetzing thing....

  172. Re:phirst fost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ShoutOuts To all my VMS niggaz.Word!!!

  173. Re: anode voltages by unitron · · Score: 2

    Weren't most aircraft electronics from "back then" designed for 400 Hz AC (not Volts, cycles per second, as opposed to 60 cycle household current)? The higher frequency was so that transformers and filter chokes could use smaller, lighter iron cores.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  174. tube testers and Wire recorders by hawk · · Score: 2
    >know anyone who wants a professional tube tester?


    Me, but I already have one :)


    Know anyone who knows how to fix a wire recorder?


    This thing uses a five or ten pound "cassette" to hold the wire spool it uses for audio recording. I even have a second (but broken) cassette for it.


    hawk

  175. instant replay by hawk · · Score: 2
    ABC originally pulled off INstant Replay by using computer hard drives as analog devices . . . I forget how much time they held (not a lot!), but it was pretty much just an analog recording on the disk surface, allowing them to instantly go back a few seconds . . .


    hawk

  176. It's... by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

    Totally tubular, dude!

  177. High Fidelity Tube Amps versus Guitar Amps by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    Agreed!

    For guitars, tube amps just sound better. Digital modelling, etc., all try to REPRODUCE the sound of a tube amps, not best it. That's fairly telling. The reasons tube amps sound better for guitars are varied, but are mostly centered around overdriving the amp. The distortion comes on very smoothly as you roll the volume up, and responds to dynamics much better.

    A very big point with guitar amps is microphonics. Since the amplifier chassis tends to be built into the same cabinet as the speaker, all the tubes are vibrating with each note. This does all sorts of neat things to the sound, since the elements (plate, grid(s), cathode) are all vibrating with respect to each other. In REproduction, microphonic tubes are a very bad thing. But in a guitar amp, the amplifier is absolutely part of the instrument.

    Some of the best audiophile home stereos I've heard have been tube (mid 70's Marantz gear), and some have been transistor (late 70's Marantz gear). But tube amps are just NOT cost effective anymore, and almost all of the supposed advantages are just audiophile snobbery.

    Agreed. Most of today's tube fascination is unjustified.

    A tube output amplifier is *not* a high fidelity device in this day and age - by using tubes, you're forcing yourself to deal with the nonlinearities in the behavior of the tubes and, more importantly, of the output transformer which impedance-matches the tube to the speaker. Building a transformer to be a "straight wire with impedance matching" at any sort of power from 20Hz to 20kHz is non trivial, from the core up. (Power transformers from 50/60Hz are big and heavy, full of laminated iron sheets. Transformers for 15kHz (TV flyback transformer) are ferrite-cored. Hugely different magnetic properties of the core, and both of those devices are *within* the audio range!) There is no logical or rational reason, in this day and age, to use a tube output stage in a non-guitar amplifier.

    However, in small signal stages, things are different. Since tubes run at higher voltages than comparable solid state components, induced noise is less significant. If your audio signal is floating around on a DC offset of 140V and you're inducing 500mV of noise into it, that's a hell of a lot less obtrusive than the same 500mV of noise induced on a 12V offset. Never mind that the interstage amplitudes also tend to be higher. There are a couple of issues, here, though. Tubes are larger, meaning that they have larger areas of conductors to pick up noise than, let's say, a surface-mount MOSFET on a ground-plane PC board. And vibration is strictly verboten; we don't want to color the music.

    And tubes amplifiers tend to have high input and output impedances, which makes them ideal for pre-amp stages.

    Audiophiles like tubes for the wrong reasons. If tubes add "warmth" to your music, the amplifier is probably driving them too hard and you're attenuating the high end (ie. poor design). But if a tube amplifier is indistinguishable from a semiconductor amplifier except that there's less hiss, then the tubes are doing their jobs.

    As I told an "audiophile" once, they don't use Monster Cables in the recording studio... Balanced line XLR. Good engineering is always better than cheap crap sold in shiny blister packs. :)

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:High Fidelity Tube Amps versus Guitar Amps by scumm · · Score: 1

      Agreed on all points.

      Funny thing, though - Monster Cable is pretty crappy cabling, but for guitar cables, the D'Addario PlanetWaves cables are actually exceptional. And they come in shiny blister packs (or rather, you CAN buy them in shiny blister backs, or in braids).

    2. Re:High Fidelity Tube Amps versus Guitar Amps by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      Funny thing, though - Monster Cable is pretty crappy cabling, but for guitar cables, the D'Addario PlanetWaves cables are actually exceptional. And they come in shiny blister packs (or rather, you CAN buy them in shiny blister backs, or in braids).

      Feh. I'll stick with the stuff the pros use: light duty work (recording studios, etc.) is HPN heater cord. About 6 cents per foot at Home Depot. :)

      Rigging arrayable speakers for use in stadiums (rock concerts), we'd run tin-plated copper stranded distribution cable (pole-to-house wire) for long runs and 8 or 10 AWG 2-conductor jacketed cable. The distro cable was used primarily for heavy metal concerts at smaller venues like the 50,000 seat SkyDome. [grin] Anything bigger and you'd fly the amps in the rigging, too.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    3. Re:High Fidelity Tube Amps versus Guitar Amps by scumm · · Score: 1

      No arguments. I tend to use 10 gauge balanced gold speaker cable for most high-end stuff. So many people are afraid of soldiering irons, it's silly. Attaching phonejack heads isn't exactly difficult.

      My comment about the PlanetWave cables is that they're pretty good, not great. The neatest thing I've seen about them is the spring-loaded locks they have that help keep you from yanking yourself unplugged (although you can accomplish that easily enough with a little duct tape, which is generally what I use, because I'm cheap and lazy).

      By the way, where the hell are you wiring that you need THAT much distance?

  178. MOSFETs==Transconductance amplifiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It begs the question:
    If tubes & FETs work on the same amplification principle -- voltage in begets current out (transconductance)--
    why not use efficient, low-cost FETs?

    1. Re:MOSFETs==Transconductance amplifiers by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      If tubes & FETs work on the same amplification principle -- voltage in begets current out (transconductance)--
      why not use efficient, low-cost FETs?


      Many people do use FETS, MOSFETS usually, for just that reason. The MOSFET, as a direct-coupled output stage, does not exhibit the soft clipping of a tube amp's transformer output.

      You also get into the concept of "euphonic distortion" -- distortion that people like. For instance, the tight bass associated with a high damping factor, direct-coupled output actually does not sound as good to some people as the looser bass from a transformer output.

      The above just a few examples.