The laws/contract surrounding this are at fault. Either these are legal, authorised deductions, or they are not.
It seems entirely perverse that Banks will accept and action unauthorised charges to your account. I would suspect that in many countries other than the US, the complainant would have been covered for the total losses.
Blame the system that allows this, as the contract/laws which protect the bank, not the punter account holder.
Slingshot is unlimited between 1am-7am. I am moving around 130Gb-150gb for around $130, including phone.
You get i think 15gig for 'peak' use, and can buy more at $1 a gig (if you buy 50gigs). Unused data is 'banked' not lost.
I'm guessing given the volume of sites which say 35gbp, that was converted to 77USD, which was mis-reported by the BBC as 77GBP, and was converted by/. to $140.
Depends how the VPN is setup, and whether or not it sets itself as the default IP gateway. It could be that it's only routing VPN destined traffic across it. Presumably when she mis-typed, she was routing across her normal gateway, which Rogers then 'improved'.
This may well mean that despite whatever you do, encypt etc, someone can sniff the password and then simply come in and delete all your files.
i.e, whatever other steps you take, this is inherently worthless.
And surely the public/investors in view of a lack of a full disclosure have the right to sack/not elect politicians/CEO's who will not disclose potentially pertinent information about their ability to work in their role.
For me it's not about replacing my battery after a year or two, but being able to swap out for my spare, fully charge battery when i am caught out, away from a charger.
It also is very limited to 3G Frequencies it supports. No MMS, No AD2P, No Bluetooth file transfer.... No Bluetooth DUN...
It's not so much the Jesus Phone as the 'Brian' phone if you ask me. It's missing far too many basics.
Assault is illegal. There is a legal defence of self-defence.
So you may defend yourself against a 'street thug' but not continue to beat him (to the point of e.g punishment or to 'teach him a leasson'.)
This is not true. Way off topic, but in a broader view:
It was illegal to hit any individual, including your own children. There was a defense in law of reasonable chastisement for parents/guardians. This was not defined clearly. A few juries had found defendants not guilty due to a lack of definition, when the defendant had clearly beat their children with instruments (not the musical kind either). There was a clear and obvious need to change the law, but a total lack of willingness from any party to write into the law exactly what would be acceptable, given that e.g, 30 year back, smacking the hell out of your kids with a leather belt or a rod was more socially acceptable.
Bradford's bill wnet through parliment with the eventual support of both main parties. There was a clear will on both sides for it, but National took the opportunity to hand it around Labour's head as a noose. Most people if you asked them would now say National voted against it.
There simply was no political will to amend the (current) bad law to define what was acceptable, and thankfully there is now no legal defence for hitting children.
Slashdot Mirror
Innit. How low can the front page go?
The laws/contract surrounding this are at fault. Either these are legal, authorised deductions, or they are not. It seems entirely perverse that Banks will accept and action unauthorised charges to your account. I would suspect that in many countries other than the US, the complainant would have been covered for the total losses. Blame the system that allows this, as the contract/laws which protect the bank, not the punter account holder.
Slingshot is unlimited between 1am-7am. I am moving around 130Gb-150gb for around $130, including phone. You get i think 15gig for 'peak' use, and can buy more at $1 a gig (if you buy 50gigs). Unused data is 'banked' not lost.
& you're going to guarantee the service you hosted with will still be around how?
I'm guessing given the volume of sites which say 35gbp, that was converted to 77USD, which was mis-reported by the BBC as 77GBP, and was converted by /. to $140.
According to many sites, he actually paid 35GBP! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2622495/A-million-bank-customers-details-sold-on-eBay-for-35.html
Given the ANC undertook politically motivated bombings in the 70s/80s, is that surprising?
RAL are saying they can see being open till November.... so plenty of time yet.
They're certainly in flux. Feed from the snow field to the glaciers is estimated at 5-6 years, so that's anyones guess.
we're seeing the best ski season since 1992. There are now around 4.5 metres of base snow at Mt Ruapehu http://www.mtruapehu.com/winter/turoa-report/
There is no deterrence element in being able to deliver a nuke by UPS.
surely if they live with you, they can gain physical access. So passwording is useless?
Depends how the VPN is setup, and whether or not it sets itself as the default IP gateway. It could be that it's only routing VPN destined traffic across it. Presumably when she mis-typed, she was routing across her normal gateway, which Rogers then 'improved'.
This may well mean that despite whatever you do, encypt etc, someone can sniff the password and then simply come in and delete all your files. i.e, whatever other steps you take, this is inherently worthless.
See how many phone calls/emails you get complaining.
helpfully, the url: contains the template! https://iphone-services.apple.com/clbl/unauthorizedApps { "Date Generated" = "2008-08-11 09:19:37 Etc/GMT"; "BlackListedApps" = { "com.mal.icious" = { "Description" = "Being really bad!"; "App Name" = "Malicious"; "Date Revoked" = "2004-02-01 08:00:00 Etc/GMT"; }; }; }
Here's a interesting DoS to cost people money with DNS poisoning.
apparently actually reading helps; that is for one month....
Per Month? For the duration of the games?
And surely the public/investors in view of a lack of a full disclosure have the right to sack/not elect politicians/CEO's who will not disclose potentially pertinent information about their ability to work in their role.
Rackspace provide Managed Hosting, not co-location. Different beasts.
For me it's not about replacing my battery after a year or two, but being able to swap out for my spare, fully charge battery when i am caught out, away from a charger.
It also is very limited to 3G Frequencies it supports. No MMS, No AD2P, No Bluetooth file transfer.... No Bluetooth DUN... It's not so much the Jesus Phone as the 'Brian' phone if you ask me. It's missing far too many basics.
Assault is illegal. There is a legal defence of self-defence. So you may defend yourself against a 'street thug' but not continue to beat him (to the point of e.g punishment or to 'teach him a leasson'.)
This is not true. Way off topic, but in a broader view: It was illegal to hit any individual, including your own children. There was a defense in law of reasonable chastisement for parents/guardians. This was not defined clearly. A few juries had found defendants not guilty due to a lack of definition, when the defendant had clearly beat their children with instruments (not the musical kind either). There was a clear and obvious need to change the law, but a total lack of willingness from any party to write into the law exactly what would be acceptable, given that e.g, 30 year back, smacking the hell out of your kids with a leather belt or a rod was more socially acceptable. Bradford's bill wnet through parliment with the eventual support of both main parties. There was a clear will on both sides for it, but National took the opportunity to hand it around Labour's head as a noose. Most people if you asked them would now say National voted against it. There simply was no political will to amend the (current) bad law to define what was acceptable, and thankfully there is now no legal defence for hitting children.