It's called a sunlamp. My wifes got Seasonal affective disorder, and we could never afford one of those ridiculous lamps they charged a fortune for at the doctors office soI built my own lamps. Now with the advent of the CFL bulb in the US I can put out 30,000 Lumens/m2 for under $100/meter and the power consumption is not that bad at all. The average amount of sunlight at sea level (diffused by the atmosphere) is about 10,000 lumans. So yes, you can get a sunburn off the lamps I build. The key is to enclose the entire lamp in a box, with clear plexiglass at the bottom to let the light out, and then put exhaust fans on it to dissipate the heat.
If Mr Assange would like me to turn his room at the embassy into the tropics, he can pay for my plane ticket and materials and I'll be there strait away. He could literally grow a palm tree in his room by the time I was done. I've nothing against the man, but this is a BS excuse.
How long until dead artists' heirs latch onto techniques like this to prove "substantial similarity" as part of a copyright suit to try to squeeze money out of working artists?
It's been going on in music since recording started.
The fact of the matter is, in music, There really is nothing new under the sun. You can't write a "new song" period. Every chord you use, has been used before. Every rhythm, every melody. In that case, Satriani knows what he's doing is BS... that guys always been a jerk. But the reality is. all music produced by all musicians is just a subtle variation on music they themselves heard elsewhere.
One of the most accused bands of all time was Led Zeppelin... why? Because they are, in essence, a blues band. And "The Blues" consists of probably less than a dozen melodies done a million different ways. Dazed and Confused, for example, is just one long Blues jam session. Phish, the grateful dead, The Black Crowes, they're all just Blues Jam bands.
I do Blues Jams all the time (you go to a club, walk on stage and just play) and I learned a trick a long time ago from a music teacher. I have 2, literally TWO, songs that if I know the root of the song... lets say A (most blues songs are in A) I just play one of those 2 songs in that key and viola, I'm playing along and it sounds great unless it's a couple of screwy songs I've run across.
In bluegrass, most songs are just some combination of the C and G chords. With maybe D thrown in. They usually don't even change key! Mostly because the standard tuning of a Banjo is Open G. If I jam with a Banjo player I just immediately star playing something in G and we're on our way.
I'm sure visual arts the same way, though I don't do painting or anything. All arts just minor variations on a theme. Over and over, throughout history. Occasionally you get several divergent themes that seem unrelated, and then you have a Genius that brings them all together and creates something that, at the time, seems entirely new. Like the guys at the turn of the century that took guitars and used them to play soul and gospel. Both existed before, but the 2 combined created the Blues.
Modern Example: Devin Townsend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Imagine Deathmetal combined with Opera, Yani, carnival music, and... um... showtunes? Yes, on the rare occasion I get to talk about music on slashdot I'm plugging my favorite guy.
2) "Model S" isn't a model that was ever produced by Daimler-Benz or Daimler AG.
3) 500 cars isn't very many and would merely be a drop in the bucket compared to how much money Daimler AG has.
4) Daimler AG has more than one person working for them.
5) Sane people make money to live their lives, not the other way around.
You clearly don't work in sales. A Sales person working for Daimler would think the following of your points: 1 through 4: Don't care, never let the stupidity of a customer get in the way of you and their money. 5) Sane people don't work in sales.
Trust me, Chicago is worse. The thing is, Chicago corruption is efficient. You pay this person X and you get Y. Very simple and strait forward. Things get done. It's an infection but it's not killing the host. What I've seen of New Orleans is corruption that doesn't work. Things don't get done.
Anything over 2.1 makes music sound Terrible. So I don't bother. Go 2.1, and spend the money making sure those 2 speakers and the sub are of quality, screw the surround.
Stop posting links to medium.com... the worst Science site I've ever seen short of timecube... wait, actually timecubes at least entertaining. All of their articles boil down to: Subject "Could *insert some inane scifi topic* really be??" 10 pages of images scraped from geocities homepages, font type and spacing worthy of a freshman English paper and then... No, not really, but thanks for reading!
What good is https going to be against the state? You think they can not coerce Verisign et al to hand over a copy of the root keys?
That's not how it works. But of course, if they are inside Google, and Microsoft (and they are) then you're screwed. But, in my experience with keys, these sorts of attacks have to be very directed. You can't just "Hack everyone" it's an exploit you'd have to hack on an individual basis. Usually because most sites, and client computers are such unique devices. Most corporate websites have been developed over decades and are a mess of hundreds of different programmers over years. I'm involved peripherally in maintaining a couple of different large(ish) sites and the code makes me cry at times. But on the other hand, good luck hacking that without bringing the whole site down, we can barely maintain it ourselves!:-p
For years, Southern California Edison imported electricity from the Four Corners Power Plant, a coal-fired facility in northwestern New Mexico... [a few months after the carbon market took effect in 2013] the company sold its interest in the coal plant to an Arizona utility (APS, 2013)... this transaction will not reduce net greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere. The coal plant will keep emitting pollution just as before--only now it serves customers in Arizona, not California.
As other states follow California's lead, it will become more and more difficult for coal plants to stay in operation.
No it wont. Cap and "trade" will never work. They'll just trade their pollution to people less likely to report what they're up to. Remember Carbon Credits? Pay someone in Columbia to plant trees for you? How many of those trees do you think actually got planted? If you want to do something about CO2 output, the feds need to monitor and test power plants CO2 output yearly, then charge a tax for mitigation. You have to pay for CO2 sequestration or other mitigating techniques. The feds then need to hire/pay a 3rd party to scrub that CO2 from the atmosphere. Then the market will naturally shift away from CO2 as the costs of it become real. The feds will also need to charge for the CO2 expended to manufacture goods, refine oils outside the country. Otherwise industries will simply move out of the country to avoid the tax. Not that I think managing CO2 use will work all that well, but this is the only way it will have any chance at all.
It's kids being diagnosed with ADHD when the correct diagnosis is really poor parenting.
You're not a parent are you? I'd have a hard time calling anyone that didn't beat their kid a bad parent. That'd be like calling someone that fell off a bridge a bad sky diver. You do what you can, there's no way to do it right, and they landing's going to hurt no mater what you do.
I've got ADHD for real. My doctor used to joke that I was the only kid he knew of that definitively had it, the rest he was just pretty sure about. At the time they were heavily medicating children for it... much worse than they do now and my parents refused to have me walking around like a zombie. Like it or not that was probably the most instrumental decision my parents made in my upbringing. Without the medication, I was left to cope with the symptoms on my own. If given several tasks to complete, I'd spend hours bouncing from one to the other and never really start any of them. Eventually I learned to deal with it on my own but never really knew how until I got to talk about it with a few shrinks.
What I did was learn a type of "Hyper focus" they described as common amongst the afflicted. I would drive all other thoughts from my mind, almost like a Buddhist, and then focus exclusively on my task. If I allowed other topics into my mind, I'd wander and lose track of what I was doing, so I instead learned not to let myself think about anything else. This skill has it's upsides I was told. I was able to grasp larger, more complex tasks because my mind was not preocupide with other things. It also had it's downside. I'd be so focused on the task at hand that if someone interupetted me I'd fly into a rage: Me:WHAT?!?! Wife: Dinners ready. Is programming the thermostat really that frustrating? Me: um... sorry?:-)
I'm glad to see they may have a definitive test, and it seems superior drugs. I don't want to say I wish I had them... I wouldn't be me without ADHD, but I welcome any tools that help parents be more informed. I wouldn't give up being abnormal for the world, but I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy either.
I award you 9.5 out of 10 troll points for that post -- brilliantly subtle, and almost guaranteed to draw people into your semantic argument.
Bravo.
Good one:-D I don't mind being trolled, go for it. In my opinion it makes you a better person through embarrassment. I'm not immune to trolling but you're going to have to try a lot harder than that. If I were you I'd go to one of my other threads, get me there, then link back to it from here. You'd have better luck. I'm going to be way too wary under this topic to fall for it.
But I'm sure as hell not going to run my door locks over wireless with some consumer product that's produced as cheaply as can be for the mass market.
So, I know "hackers" are scary and everything... but you do realize that, rather than hack your network, they can pick up a rock from by your bushes, break the glass on the door, then reach in and manually unlock it... right? It's a lot less effort.
For the past 6000 years or so, the best made security system ever devised has remained the same: A big dog.
For Christs sake... stop misusing the word "Troll" It's has a very specific meaning, but everyone uses it now as a derogatory term for anyone on the internet they disagree with. That is not what a troll is.
A Troll, very specifically, lurks, and posts to try and get you to over-react. A troll will rarely overtly offend you. Often a troll will be on your side! Egging you on, to get you to blow up at others. Sometimes a troll will simply IM you to point out other people that are deserving of your rather. A troll is an instigator, troublemaker, rabblerouser, etc...
What a troll is not, is a contrarian. I'm a contrarian, I like to argue my point. I seek out those I disagree with or subjects I feel are incorrect (Like this post!) and I argue my point. I like having people disagree with me, and like to refine my arguments. It's something I enjoy. Contrarians enjoy debate.
Trolls do not care about debate, they care about the emotional anguish of their victim. I rarely, if ever, see a real troll anymore. There used to be clubs of them all over the net, but not really anymore. You can find them on Reddit at times. A troll, for example, may be African American and go to an African American forum and argue for white supremacy. Not because he supports it, but because he knows that's what will get a reaction.
And in regards to the main point of this article... It's total BS. Argument and Debate are good things. The internet is still relatively new. People that couldn't talk before, can now. That's great. By its very nature internet debate is non-violent, which is fantastic. Let the debate continue.
I support a lot of apps... some with lots of documentation, some without.
If management came to me an asked me to assure them that your application was secure enough to store sensitive data in it, and you had no documentation... how could I assure them of that? Does the application calculate financial data accurately? I don't know. What's the developers long term goals for the product? Does it support X format? How far along is the API? Are they getting rid of it?
Documentation is far more important than just "How do I save a file?" Without it, most businesses will never approve your product for use because they'll not be able to get answers to whatever questions they need answers for to approve it.
Anyone keeping torrent downloads going on a regular basis over LTE really is just mis-using the service.
Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Then come back here and and explain to me why it's silly for users to think they can use their connection for whatever they want to.
T-Mobile spent millions advertising lies and fraudulent claims just to sell service, and is now trying to cut off the users that actually used the service in the way they advertised it. If I were selling a moving service, and I put out ads showing us moving an elephant, how on earth could I complain when a customer actually asked us to move an elephant? That's what was advertised, that's what they should deliver. End of story.
You should look up what Treason means. Because that's not what it means.
I did... per the constitution: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court." Base on that definition, neither are traitors under the constitution.
Per the English dictionary: "the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government." The NSA is clearly, and without a doubt violating the constitution. So I'd say by that definition, they are guilty. But it's not a legal definition, it's just descriptive. The NSA behaves in a "Treasonous" manner but they are not guilty of legally defined Treason.
I didn't say "Why wouldn't you have a IPv6 capable network" I asked "Why would you use IPv6?" All my equipment/OS's can handle IPv6 just fine, but there's no reason to ever use it inside a local network. I can hit IPv6 outside my network just fine... http://test-ipv6.com/
Granted, that's entirely up to your ISP. But out-of-the-box equipment that's IPv6 capable equipment should support IPv6 as long as your ISP does as well.
Now that the technologies behind our servers and networks have stabilized, IT can look forward to a different kind of constant change, writes Paul Venezia.
He has no idea how to even use the thing he's invented?!?!
To be fair, the engineers behind the x-1 had chuck yeager use the thing they invented. I'm not sure how many could actually fly a plane.
But there were at least pilots involved in the design process, and at the presentation to the airforce. They didn't sit in a booth, wave at the jet and say "Well, I have no idea how to fly... and that one there is missing a wing... but I've seen a bird before... anyway, you guys have pilots right? Like lots of them?"
Couldn't you just take any keyboard and write macros using http://www.autohotkey.com/ and do the same thing? Neither of his demo units are functional? He has no idea how to even use the thing he's invented?!?! I don't think I'll be investing any time soon.:-)
Slashdot Mirror
It's called a sunlamp. My wifes got Seasonal affective disorder, and we could never afford one of those ridiculous lamps they charged a fortune for at the doctors office soI built my own lamps. Now with the advent of the CFL bulb in the US I can put out 30,000 Lumens/m2 for under $100/meter and the power consumption is not that bad at all. The average amount of sunlight at sea level (diffused by the atmosphere) is about 10,000 lumans. So yes, you can get a sunburn off the lamps I build. The key is to enclose the entire lamp in a box, with clear plexiglass at the bottom to let the light out, and then put exhaust fans on it to dissipate the heat.
If Mr Assange would like me to turn his room at the embassy into the tropics, he can pay for my plane ticket and materials and I'll be there strait away. He could literally grow a palm tree in his room by the time I was done. I've nothing against the man, but this is a BS excuse.
How long until dead artists' heirs latch onto techniques like this to prove "substantial similarity" as part of a copyright suit to try to squeeze money out of working artists?
It's been going on in music since recording started.
If you're not an artist, if you're not a musician, it's easy to listen to something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
and assume plagiarism.
The fact of the matter is, in music, There really is nothing new under the sun. You can't write a "new song" period. Every chord you use, has been used before. Every rhythm, every melody. In that case, Satriani knows what he's doing is BS... that guys always been a jerk. But the reality is. all music produced by all musicians is just a subtle variation on music they themselves heard elsewhere.
One of the most accused bands of all time was Led Zeppelin... why? Because they are, in essence, a blues band. And "The Blues" consists of probably less than a dozen melodies done a million different ways. Dazed and Confused, for example, is just one long Blues jam session. Phish, the grateful dead, The Black Crowes, they're all just Blues Jam bands.
I do Blues Jams all the time (you go to a club, walk on stage and just play) and I learned a trick a long time ago from a music teacher. I have 2, literally TWO, songs that if I know the root of the song... lets say A (most blues songs are in A) I just play one of those 2 songs in that key and viola, I'm playing along and it sounds great unless it's a couple of screwy songs I've run across.
In bluegrass, most songs are just some combination of the C and G chords. With maybe D thrown in. They usually don't even change key! Mostly because the standard tuning of a Banjo is Open G. If I jam with a Banjo player I just immediately star playing something in G and we're on our way.
I'm sure visual arts the same way, though I don't do painting or anything. All arts just minor variations on a theme. Over and over, throughout history. Occasionally you get several divergent themes that seem unrelated, and then you have a Genius that brings them all together and creates something that, at the time, seems entirely new. Like the guys at the turn of the century that took guitars and used them to play soul and gospel. Both existed before, but the 2 combined created the Blues.
Modern Example:
Devin Townsend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Imagine Deathmetal combined with Opera, Yani, carnival music, and... um... showtunes?
Yes, on the rare occasion I get to talk about music on slashdot I'm plugging my favorite guy.
1) Daimler-Benz doesn't exist any more.
2) "Model S" isn't a model that was ever produced by Daimler-Benz or Daimler AG.
3) 500 cars isn't very many and would merely be a drop in the bucket compared to how much money Daimler AG has.
4) Daimler AG has more than one person working for them.
5) Sane people make money to live their lives, not the other way around.
You clearly don't work in sales. A Sales person working for Daimler would think the following of your points:
1 through 4: Don't care, never let the stupidity of a customer get in the way of you and their money.
5) Sane people don't work in sales.
Trust me, Chicago is worse. The thing is, Chicago corruption is efficient. You pay this person X and you get Y. Very simple and strait forward. Things get done. It's an infection but it's not killing the host. What I've seen of New Orleans is corruption that doesn't work. Things don't get done.
Real engineers don't size databases.
Real engineers do everything.
Anything over 2.1 makes music sound Terrible. So I don't bother. Go 2.1, and spend the money making sure those 2 speakers and the sub are of quality, screw the surround.
Stop posting links to medium.com... the worst Science site I've ever seen short of timecube... wait, actually timecubes at least entertaining.
All of their articles boil down to:
Subject "Could *insert some inane scifi topic* really be??"
10 pages of images scraped from geocities homepages, font type and spacing worthy of a freshman English paper and then...
No, not really, but thanks for reading!
You want real science news? Here you go: http://phys.org/physics-news/
What good is https going to be against the state? You think they can not coerce Verisign et al to hand over a copy of the root keys?
That's not how it works. But of course, if they are inside Google, and Microsoft (and they are) then you're screwed. But, in my experience with keys, these sorts of attacks have to be very directed. You can't just "Hack everyone" it's an exploit you'd have to hack on an individual basis. Usually because most sites, and client computers are such unique devices. Most corporate websites have been developed over decades and are a mess of hundreds of different programmers over years. I'm involved peripherally in maintaining a couple of different large(ish) sites and the code makes me cry at times. But on the other hand, good luck hacking that without bringing the whole site down, we can barely maintain it ourselves! :-p
As other states follow California's lead, it will become more and more difficult for coal plants to stay in operation.
No it wont. Cap and "trade" will never work. They'll just trade their pollution to people less likely to report what they're up to. Remember Carbon Credits? Pay someone in Columbia to plant trees for you? How many of those trees do you think actually got planted? If you want to do something about CO2 output, the feds need to monitor and test power plants CO2 output yearly, then charge a tax for mitigation. You have to pay for CO2 sequestration or other mitigating techniques. The feds then need to hire/pay a 3rd party to scrub that CO2 from the atmosphere. Then the market will naturally shift away from CO2 as the costs of it become real.
The feds will also need to charge for the CO2 expended to manufacture goods, refine oils outside the country. Otherwise industries will simply move out of the country to avoid the tax. Not that I think managing CO2 use will work all that well, but this is the only way it will have any chance at all.
It's kids being diagnosed with ADHD when the correct diagnosis is really poor parenting.
You're not a parent are you? I'd have a hard time calling anyone that didn't beat their kid a bad parent. That'd be like calling someone that fell off a bridge a bad sky diver. You do what you can, there's no way to do it right, and they landing's going to hurt no mater what you do.
I've got ADHD for real. My doctor used to joke that I was the only kid he knew of that definitively had it, the rest he was just pretty sure about. At the time they were heavily medicating children for it... much worse than they do now and my parents refused to have me walking around like a zombie. Like it or not that was probably the most instrumental decision my parents made in my upbringing. Without the medication, I was left to cope with the symptoms on my own. If given several tasks to complete, I'd spend hours bouncing from one to the other and never really start any of them. Eventually I learned to deal with it on my own but never really knew how until I got to talk about it with a few shrinks.
What I did was learn a type of "Hyper focus" they described as common amongst the afflicted. I would drive all other thoughts from my mind, almost like a Buddhist, and then focus exclusively on my task. If I allowed other topics into my mind, I'd wander and lose track of what I was doing, so I instead learned not to let myself think about anything else. This skill has it's upsides I was told. I was able to grasp larger, more complex tasks because my mind was not preocupide with other things. It also had it's downside. I'd be so focused on the task at hand that if someone interupetted me I'd fly into a rage: :-)
Me:WHAT?!?!
Wife: Dinners ready. Is programming the thermostat really that frustrating?
Me: um... sorry?
I'm glad to see they may have a definitive test, and it seems superior drugs. I don't want to say I wish I had them... I wouldn't be me without ADHD, but I welcome any tools that help parents be more informed. I wouldn't give up being abnormal for the world, but I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy either.
I award you 9.5 out of 10 troll points for that post -- brilliantly subtle, and almost guaranteed to draw people into your semantic argument.
Bravo.
Good one :-D
I don't mind being trolled, go for it. In my opinion it makes you a better person through embarrassment. I'm not immune to trolling but you're going to have to try a lot harder than that. If I were you I'd go to one of my other threads, get me there, then link back to it from here. You'd have better luck. I'm going to be way too wary under this topic to fall for it.
But I'm sure as hell not going to run my door locks over wireless with some consumer product that's produced as cheaply as can be for the mass market.
So, I know "hackers" are scary and everything... but you do realize that, rather than hack your network, they can pick up a rock from by your bushes, break the glass on the door, then reach in and manually unlock it... right? It's a lot less effort.
For the past 6000 years or so, the best made security system ever devised has remained the same: A big dog.
For Christs sake... stop misusing the word "Troll"
It's has a very specific meaning, but everyone uses it now as a derogatory term for anyone on the internet they disagree with. That is not what a troll is.
A Troll, very specifically, lurks, and posts to try and get you to over-react. A troll will rarely overtly offend you. Often a troll will be on your side! Egging you on, to get you to blow up at others. Sometimes a troll will simply IM you to point out other people that are deserving of your rather. A troll is an instigator, troublemaker, rabblerouser, etc...
What a troll is not, is a contrarian. I'm a contrarian, I like to argue my point. I seek out those I disagree with or subjects I feel are incorrect (Like this post!) and I argue my point. I like having people disagree with me, and like to refine my arguments. It's something I enjoy. Contrarians enjoy debate.
Trolls do not care about debate, they care about the emotional anguish of their victim. I rarely, if ever, see a real troll anymore. There used to be clubs of them all over the net, but not really anymore. You can find them on Reddit at times. A troll, for example, may be African American and go to an African American forum and argue for white supremacy. Not because he supports it, but because he knows that's what will get a reaction.
And in regards to the main point of this article... It's total BS. Argument and Debate are good things. The internet is still relatively new. People that couldn't talk before, can now. That's great. By its very nature internet debate is non-violent, which is fantastic. Let the debate continue.
I support a lot of apps... some with lots of documentation, some without.
If management came to me an asked me to assure them that your application was secure enough to store sensitive data in it, and you had no documentation... how could I assure them of that? Does the application calculate financial data accurately? I don't know. What's the developers long term goals for the product? Does it support X format? How far along is the API? Are they getting rid of it?
Documentation is far more important than just "How do I save a file?" Without it, most businesses will never approve your product for use because they'll not be able to get answers to whatever questions they need answers for to approve it.
The IPhones biggest security threat is the US Federal Government.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
But the Friedman-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker model is based on the Einstein-DeSitter model:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
They're even credited and referred to multiple times.
It's not evolution it's erosion, we are losing the original meaning and gaining nothing.
If that were true we're still be speaking Sumerian.
Anyone keeping torrent downloads going on a regular basis over LTE really is just mis-using the service.
Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Then come back here and and explain to me why it's silly for users to think they can use their connection for whatever they want to.
T-Mobile spent millions advertising lies and fraudulent claims just to sell service, and is now trying to cut off the users that actually used the service in the way they advertised it. If I were selling a moving service, and I put out ads showing us moving an elephant, how on earth could I complain when a customer actually asked us to move an elephant? That's what was advertised, that's what they should deliver. End of story.
You should look up what Treason means. Because that's not what it means.
I did... per the constitution:
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."
Base on that definition, neither are traitors under the constitution.
Per the English dictionary:
"the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government."
The NSA is clearly, and without a doubt violating the constitution. So I'd say by that definition, they are guilty. But it's not a legal definition, it's just descriptive. The NSA behaves in a "Treasonous" manner but they are not guilty of legally defined Treason.
I didn't say "Why wouldn't you have a IPv6 capable network" I asked "Why would you use IPv6?" All my equipment/OS's can handle IPv6 just fine, but there's no reason to ever use it inside a local network. I can hit IPv6 outside my network just fine... http://test-ipv6.com/
Granted, that's entirely up to your ISP. But out-of-the-box equipment that's IPv6 capable equipment should support IPv6 as long as your ISP does as well.
Now that the technologies behind our servers and networks have stabilized, IT can look forward to a different kind of constant change, writes Paul Venezia.
I don't think Paul Venezia works in IT.
Why on earth would you ever use IPv6 on an internal network?
He has no idea how to even use the thing he's invented?!?!
To be fair, the engineers behind the x-1 had chuck yeager use the thing they invented. I'm not sure how many could actually fly a plane.
But there were at least pilots involved in the design process, and at the presentation to the airforce. They didn't sit in a booth, wave at the jet and say "Well, I have no idea how to fly... and that one there is missing a wing... but I've seen a bird before... anyway, you guys have pilots right? Like lots of them?"
Couldn't you just take any keyboard and write macros using http://www.autohotkey.com/ and do the same thing? :-)
Neither of his demo units are functional?
He has no idea how to even use the thing he's invented?!?!
I don't think I'll be investing any time soon.