Security experts say that if you're using a fully patched system with up-to-date security software, you should be protected from these attacks. To date, they've worked by hitting the victim with malicious PDF or Flash files.
I'd gladly install or do anything technical for them cause I enjoy that shit, but I'm not going to spend my time + money to buy them shit that 1.
I for one hope that you spend the time gained by not shopping for your friends on developing your vocabulary. Then you can start forming sentences like this:
I'd gladly install or do anything technical for them because I enjoy doing that, but I'm not going to spend my time and money to buy them things that...
A bit like how the US invaded a Iraq (on false pretenses) causing billions of dollars worth of damage. Brought in US giant companies to rebuild the country and then starting whining about how the rest of the world should contribute to the reconstruction?
Could also be explained something like this...
1. Burn down your neighbours house.
2. Contract your Brother to rebuild it.
3. Get kickback from your brother.
4. Profit!!!
"encouraging manufacturers and retailers to purchase fewer (or even not stock) AMD processors."
How could that possibly be illegal?
How about this "In addition to providing rebates to manufacturers that bought almost entirely Intel products, the Commission found that the chipmaker had paid them to postpone or cancel the launch of specific products based on AMD chips."
The obvious did not seem very obvious when reading your response to AC. The EU do not have any limit on free speech as the fact that there are 15 Sovereign member states that do not have that limit clearly shows.
A series of defacements left little doubt about where the attack originated. "Beat down Imperialism of American [sic]! Attack anti-Chinese arrogance!" read the Interior Department's National Business Center site. "CHINA HACK!" proclaimed the Department of Labor home page. "I AM CHINESE," declared a U.S. Navy page.
Yep, that everything your read on the internet is true is a well established fact. Or, could this just possibly be psyops with the purpose of generating fear, fishing for funding and any other of a myriad of other possibilities beside that it is a Chinese attack, which of course that too is a possibility.
Of the two organizations, only one appears to be problematic.
SFU is basically an organization for people who want to keep up to date with IP law.
SFU is a bit more than that when you look at the supporting members" where you find AB Svensk Filmindustri (Swedish Filmindustry inc.), IFPI, STIM" and several other organisations who have direct interest in a the case going against TPB
No, the Swedish laws are not very different in that aspect. If a Judge find himself in a situation where there is a risk of bias or conflict of interest then he should inform the involved parties. At which time he voluntarily can choose to step down. If the judge do not remove himself then the involved parties can request his removal.
It is not like they are getting out of it. What will happen is that HovrÃtten (the Court of Appeal) will decide if there were bias or not. Depending on the decision it will either be a retrial or their appeals will go to HovrÃtten in due time. Not much of a change judicially, although PR wise it certainly benefits TPB.
What in the world makes you think that Google would want to fragment their app base into lots of little segments based on inane carrier licenses, and force devs to put out umpteen different versions of each app?
During a intercontinental flight a magazine won't do you much long. If you are a fast reader a standard paperback will be finished long before yo arrive, of corse that is if you are fortunate enough to be able to focus on something for more than 5 minutes at a time due to the annoying brat in seat 36A and the piss drunk idiots in the row behind you. At times like that internet access can be quite a neat thing to have as there are plenty of distractions (from brats and drunk idiots) that require little concentration, replying to/. comments for example.;-)
I care about privacy, state control issues and so on, but a lot less than I care about shutting down these monsters.
"In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist;
And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist;
And then they came for the Jews, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew;
And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up."
Slashdot Mirror
You insensitive clod, I am a 40 year old virgin and moved out of the basement a year ago!
Security experts say that if you're using a fully patched system with up-to-date security software, you should be protected from these attacks. To date, they've worked by hitting the victim with malicious PDF or Flash files.
+1 Funny, regardless of me being the target. :-)
I'd gladly install or do anything technical for them cause I enjoy that shit, but I'm not going to spend my time + money to buy them shit that 1.
I for one hope that you spend the time gained by not shopping for your friends on developing your vocabulary. Then you can start forming sentences like this:
I'd gladly install or do anything technical for them because I enjoy doing that, but I'm not going to spend my time and money to buy them things that...
Gah!!!, should have been Iraq, not "a Iraq".
A bit like how the US invaded a Iraq (on false pretenses) causing billions of dollars worth of damage. Brought in US giant companies to rebuild the country and then starting whining about how the rest of the world should contribute to the reconstruction?
Could also be explained something like this...
1. Burn down your neighbours house.
2. Contract your Brother to rebuild it.
3. Get kickback from your brother.
4. Profit!!!
"encouraging manufacturers and retailers to purchase fewer (or even not stock) AMD processors." How could that possibly be illegal?
How about this "In addition to providing rebates to manufacturers that bought almost entirely Intel products, the Commission found that the chipmaker had paid them to postpone or cancel the launch of specific products based on AMD chips."
Hey, thanks for pointing out the obvious..
The obvious did not seem very obvious when reading your response to AC. The EU do not have any limit on free speech as the fact that there are 15 Sovereign member states that do not have that limit clearly shows.
France and the EU are not the same thing, what you can and can not say vary between the different EU member nations.
A series of defacements left little doubt about where the attack originated. "Beat down Imperialism of American [sic]! Attack anti-Chinese arrogance!" read the Interior Department's National Business Center site. "CHINA HACK!" proclaimed the Department of Labor home page. "I AM CHINESE," declared a U.S. Navy page.
Yep, that everything your read on the internet is true is a well established fact. Or, could this just possibly be psyops with the purpose of generating fear, fishing for funding and any other of a myriad of other possibilities beside that it is a Chinese attack, which of course that too is a possibility.
Of the two organizations, only one appears to be problematic.
SFU is basically an organization for people who want to keep up to date with IP law.
SFU is a bit more than that when you look at the supporting members" where you find AB Svensk Filmindustri (Swedish Filmindustry inc.), IFPI, STIM" and several other organisations who have direct interest in a the case going against TPB
I forgot to point out that IANAL and that the above is a simplification of the procedure ahead.
No, the Swedish laws are not very different in that aspect. If a Judge find himself in a situation where there is a risk of bias or conflict of interest then he should inform the involved parties. At which time he voluntarily can choose to step down. If the judge do not remove himself then the involved parties can request his removal.
It is not like they are getting out of it. What will happen is that HovrÃtten (the Court of Appeal) will decide if there were bias or not. Depending on the decision it will either be a retrial or their appeals will go to HovrÃtten in due time. Not much of a change judicially, although PR wise it certainly benefits TPB.
Erm
no one uses this site
Just wait for the Streisand effect to kick in. ;-)
To scan you network quickly for Conficker infections before the next variant breaks this new techinque[sic], we recommend this command:
nmap -p139,445 --script p2p-conficker,smb-os-discovery,smb-check-vulns --script-args checkconficker=1,safe=1 -T4 [target networks]
If you have time for a slower but more comprehensive scan, use this instead:
nmap --script p2p-conficker,smb-os-discovery,smb-check-vulns -p- --script-args checkall=1,safe=1 -T4 [target networks]
You are proposing that we kill all humans?
Just in case you experienced a Woosh moment.
The bandwidth ain't the only reason I'd like to move there, if you get what I mean.
Would the other reason have something to do with tentacles?
If this were a FUD campaign, then which of those is Joe Public more likely to get worked up about, do you suppose?
I don't know about Joe Public. But, for Joe the Plumber terrorist and communist probably are synonyms.
Given that we sustained almost 100 KIA and nearly 600 WIA
FTFA "November 2004 battle in the Iraqi town of Fallouja that left dead 38 U.S. troops and an estimated 1,200 insurgents."
So, those of us who barely ever use Youtube should subsidize Rickrolling.
What in the world makes you think that Google would want to fragment their app base into lots of little segments based on inane carrier licenses, and force devs to put out umpteen different versions of each app?
"A Google spokesperson tells Ars, "We inadvertently unpublished the applications for all carriers, and today we have corrected the problem so that all Android Market users outside the T-Mobile US network will now have access to the applications. We have notified the affected developers."
During a intercontinental flight a magazine won't do you much long. If you are a fast reader a standard paperback will be finished long before yo arrive, of corse that is if you are fortunate enough to be able to focus on something for more than 5 minutes at a time due to the annoying brat in seat 36A and the piss drunk idiots in the row behind you. At times like that internet access can be quite a neat thing to have as there are plenty of distractions (from brats and drunk idiots) that require little concentration, replying to /. comments for example. ;-)
only do it if you don't mind the Soviet Russia listening to your traffic.
So, that's what they call The Land of the Free nowadays. ;-)
I care about privacy, state control issues and so on, but a lot less than I care about shutting down these monsters.
"In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist;
And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist;
And then they came for the Jews, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew;
And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up."