If you want to me take anything you say seriously then you best back up your words. I'm not doing the legwork for you.
The bullshit argument of the loser. You're uneducated on a topic to the point that you don't know basic facts about it, then when presented with those facts you raise objection because you don't like them, but you still refuse to learn anything about the topic you're bitching about. Instead, you expect everything to be spoonfed to you.
Try stepping out into the real world. You're expected to have a base level of competency and familiarity about something before anyone will engage in that thing with you. Or you can pay them for education / training.
Cucks don't get to fuck. Cucks also don't get fucked, least of all in any way that would make them moan. Your traditional cuck doesn't even get to watch, and typically doesn't even know when they're getting cucked. Any fucking a true cuck gets is a distraction / charity fucking. The cuck is oblivious to their partner having someone else they have real sex or breed with.
Your modern cuck fetishists know they're getting cucked and enjoy watching. They still don't get to participate. Someone watching while participating by themselves is not a cuck fetishist, but a voyeur.
Seems to me the math is on point. You, for some reason, want to ignore the losses as "capital investment" despite the fact that the investment is nearly entirely to build more of the cars they are selling at a huge fucking loss.
The correct and sane approach is to look at the loss per car and hope it shrinks (or switches to profit) as the benefits of that investment are realized. If the loss per car don't improve or they worsen, then the investment was a failure, will not be recouped (let alone generate a positive return), and should not be repeated.
By trying to separate the COST OF IMPROVING MANUFACTURING from the PROFIT PER CAR MANUFACTURED AND SOLD, you're just trying to hide the turd.
A Conduct Code does not means you had to accept source code from everybody just to don't hurt people feelings.
It does. If someone of a special snowflake group gets offended that their code is rejected / changed / has a not-nice comment added / whatever, you're fucking done. People will trawl through changes to find any data point matching the narrative that a certain group was disproportionately hit with code rejections or whatever else. They'll cherry pick the fuck out of everything to get one data point to stab you to death with. You will not be able to refute it by showing the larger trend wherein the data point is noise, nor will you be able to argue that the code was factually bad. You will be shouted down, kicked out, and harassed.
When you're fixing too many bugs in code submitted by a certain group, the code of conduct prevents you from fixing those bugs. Anyone in that group can complain that you're treating them differently and they'll win, and you'll be ejected. The quality of the code or the factual correctness of any change to or rejection of code doesn't matter. If a certain group isn't represented to the the degree they feel they should be, you will increase their representation or you will be removed.
It's not about Shakespeare winning. It's about the incorrect one losing.
Fast forward 500 years from now, and someone could point to this story as evidence that "all the sudden" was used in an attempt to justify it. That doesn't mean it was used CORRECTLY.
Pointing to past usage isn't an argument. They had idiots in the past, too.
You are free to use the correct form, but pointing out the inferiority of the newer, sloppier ones does not make you look particularly good, even to those who know where you're coming from.
Of course it does. I know because when others do the same thing they look good to me.
If you're a dominant FPS player right now on controller and you're worried that all the sudden you're gonna get swamped because a bunch of mouse and keyboard players are gonna get flooded into your game, that's not what we're doing.
I'm more worried that this overpaid knob, or the overpaid knob quoting him, considers "all the sudden" to be cromulent.
I have the correct definition. Go look up the meaning of "profess", go look up the history of what were considered to be "professions". The modern "dictionary" literally defines literally as figuratively.
We've been over this. It's not a profession unless it's regulated by the government (or some secret society like the free masons, I guess) to enforce membership requirements, competency, etc.
Lawyers, doctors, plumbers, electricians, etc. are all professionals. "Esports" players, software engineers, etc. are not professionals. Hookers in an area that allows and regulates it are professionals. Hookers in an area that does not allow for it, or that does not regulate it, are not.
Being a professional means you have officially professed to meeting the requirements of education, training, experience, sacred rites, secret handshakes, or whatever else and will uphold some set of standards. A while back you may have been professing to the Senate, or to your trade guild, or to your church.
Because CNET doesn't want you actually expressing your thoughts on privacy, I'll provide the goods: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/feder...
On behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is requesting comments on ways to advance consumer privacy while protecting prosperity and innovation. NTIA is seeking public comments on a proposed approach to this task that lays out a set of user-centric privacy outcomes that underpin the protections that should be produced by any Federal actions on consumer-privacy policy, and a set of high-level goals that describe the outlines of the ecosystem that should be created to provide those protections.
Written comments identified by Docket No. 180821780-8780-01 may be submitted by email to privacyrfc2018@ntia.doc.gov. Comments submitted by email should be machine-readable and should not be copy-protected. Written comments also may be submitted by mail to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 4725, Attn: Privacy RFC, Washington, DC 20230.
It continued and expanded under his watch, and Obama went to bat for them by lying to the public, on camera, about it. Immediately after his lie, the truth was exposed widely (anyone with a brain already knew, but the general populace was willing to believe Obama and his media puppets).
They ARE listening to our phone calls. They ARE reading our emails.
The "cards" were introduced back when Google Now was its own separate thing.
The idea was you'd get cards relevant to you, such as weather, stock prices, sports scores, news, etc. The reality was you'd get weather and a bunch of shit you didn't want. Sure, you could tell it you weren't interested in sports, politics, celebrity news, etc. but you may as well tell your mother in law you and your wife aren't ready to have kids yet. Even the shit it was supposed to do well got drowned out by the nonsense. Oh, you wanted your parking location? Sorry, the latest news from TMZ bumped that off the list. Your morning commute notification didn't happen because we thought you'd be more interested in local theater listings at 8 AM on a Wednesday. Sure, we can tell you that your flight was delayed after snooping through your email to know all your travel info, but it won't do you any good because you'll already be in the TSA grope line by the time the airline even admits the possibility of the flight being delayed.
Then Google Now got killed off in favor of just being part of the Google "app". In the latest Android versions I believe you swipe to one screen left of the leftmost homescreen to get to it. I don't know because I don't use that shit. I do know you have even less effective control over it than you had over Google Now, and it's more of a pain in the ass to disable because it's more deeply integrated into the Google "app", which is basically a search bar slapped onto Chrome plus the always listening agent that feeds all of your audio to HQ. (And Google's voice assistant is a joke. Bitch will ask you "Which application?" but will NEVER actually react to your response despite showing that it recognized it, as evidenced by the text at the top appearing correctly.)
If you can reach out to another host, then you're on a network. If you can reach out to a host not on your network, then you're reaching to a different network. This means the separate networks are interconnected. An "internet" if you will. You may need to find a way to route data around.
The "web" is nothing more than the internet + a way to discover and navigate hosts and services.
Slashdot Mirror
If you want to me take anything you say seriously then you best back up your words. I'm not doing the legwork for you.
The bullshit argument of the loser. You're uneducated on a topic to the point that you don't know basic facts about it, then when presented with those facts you raise objection because you don't like them, but you still refuse to learn anything about the topic you're bitching about. Instead, you expect everything to be spoonfed to you.
Try stepping out into the real world. You're expected to have a base level of competency and familiarity about something before anyone will engage in that thing with you. Or you can pay them for education / training.
China has 4x the number of people that the US has
So? Does the planet care about that? Does your environment get less smog rolling over from China based on population?
That's not how cuckolds work.
Cucks don't get to fuck. Cucks also don't get fucked, least of all in any way that would make them moan.
Your traditional cuck doesn't even get to watch, and typically doesn't even know when they're getting cucked.
Any fucking a true cuck gets is a distraction / charity fucking. The cuck is oblivious to their partner having someone else they have real sex or breed with.
Your modern cuck fetishists know they're getting cucked and enjoy watching. They still don't get to participate.
Someone watching while participating by themselves is not a cuck fetishist, but a voyeur.
Seems to me the math is on point. You, for some reason, want to ignore the losses as "capital investment" despite the fact that the investment is nearly entirely to build more of the cars they are selling at a huge fucking loss.
The correct and sane approach is to look at the loss per car and hope it shrinks (or switches to profit) as the benefits of that investment are realized. If the loss per car don't improve or they worsen, then the investment was a failure, will not be recouped (let alone generate a positive return), and should not be repeated.
By trying to separate the COST OF IMPROVING MANUFACTURING from the PROFIT PER CAR MANUFACTURED AND SOLD, you're just trying to hide the turd.
How dumb do you have to be to have multiple?
You repeated yourself twice. The first instance isn't a repetition.
Any reference to master / slave IDE devices?
Any reference to WD Black drives?
A Conduct Code does not means you had to accept source code from everybody just to don't hurt people feelings.
It does. If someone of a special snowflake group gets offended that their code is rejected / changed / has a not-nice comment added / whatever, you're fucking done. People will trawl through changes to find any data point matching the narrative that a certain group was disproportionately hit with code rejections or whatever else. They'll cherry pick the fuck out of everything to get one data point to stab you to death with. You will not be able to refute it by showing the larger trend wherein the data point is noise, nor will you be able to argue that the code was factually bad. You will be shouted down, kicked out, and harassed.
When you're fixing too many bugs in code submitted by a certain group, the code of conduct prevents you from fixing those bugs.
Anyone in that group can complain that you're treating them differently and they'll win, and you'll be ejected.
The quality of the code or the factual correctness of any change to or rejection of code doesn't matter. If a certain group isn't represented to the the degree they feel they should be, you will increase their representation or you will be removed.
I'm guessing exactly zero.
With KeePass Droid, the clear clipboard timeout DOES NOT WORK on most phones.
On Android, all apps have access to the clipboard (or "Clip Tray").
It's not about Shakespeare winning. It's about the incorrect one losing.
Fast forward 500 years from now, and someone could point to this story as evidence that "all the sudden" was used in an attempt to justify it.
That doesn't mean it was used CORRECTLY.
Pointing to past usage isn't an argument. They had idiots in the past, too.
You are free to use the correct form, but pointing out the inferiority of the newer, sloppier ones does not make you look particularly good, even to those who know where you're coming from.
Of course it does. I know because when others do the same thing they look good to me.
If you're a dominant FPS player right now on controller and you're worried that all the sudden you're gonna get swamped because a bunch of mouse and keyboard players are gonna get flooded into your game, that's not what we're doing.
I'm more worried that this overpaid knob, or the overpaid knob quoting him, considers "all the sudden" to be cromulent.
I have the correct definition. Go look up the meaning of "profess", go look up the history of what were considered to be "professions".
The modern "dictionary" literally defines literally as figuratively.
We've been over this. It's not a profession unless it's regulated by the government (or some secret society like the free masons, I guess) to enforce membership requirements, competency, etc.
Lawyers, doctors, plumbers, electricians, etc. are all professionals.
"Esports" players, software engineers, etc. are not professionals.
Hookers in an area that allows and regulates it are professionals. Hookers in an area that does not allow for it, or that does not regulate it, are not.
Being a professional means you have officially professed to meeting the requirements of education, training, experience, sacred rites, secret handshakes, or whatever else and will uphold some set of standards. A while back you may have been professing to the Senate, or to your trade guild, or to your church.
that need voiced
[] To be
[x] Not to be
That answers that, I guess.
CNET is a farce, yes, as are Slashdot's "editors".
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/feder...
Because CNET doesn't want you actually expressing your thoughts on privacy, I'll provide the goods: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/feder...
On behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is requesting comments on ways to advance consumer privacy while protecting prosperity and innovation. NTIA is seeking public comments on a proposed approach to this task that lays out a set of user-centric privacy outcomes that underpin the protections that should be produced by any Federal actions on consumer-privacy policy, and a set of high-level goals that describe the outlines of the ecosystem that should be created to provide those protections.
Written comments identified by Docket No. 180821780-8780-01 may be submitted by email to privacyrfc2018@ntia.doc.gov. Comments submitted by email should be machine-readable and should not be copy-protected. Written comments also may be submitted by mail to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 4725, Attn: Privacy RFC, Washington, DC 20230.
It continued and expanded under his watch, and Obama went to bat for them by lying to the public, on camera, about it.
Immediately after his lie, the truth was exposed widely (anyone with a brain already knew, but the general populace was willing to believe Obama and his media puppets).
They ARE listening to our phone calls. They ARE reading our emails.
Yup, this. Steve Jobs was a shitlord assclown but he would NEVER have taken Intel's bribe money to use their vastly inferior shit.
The "cards" were introduced back when Google Now was its own separate thing.
The idea was you'd get cards relevant to you, such as weather, stock prices, sports scores, news, etc.
The reality was you'd get weather and a bunch of shit you didn't want. Sure, you could tell it you weren't interested in sports, politics, celebrity news, etc. but you may as well tell your mother in law you and your wife aren't ready to have kids yet. Even the shit it was supposed to do well got drowned out by the nonsense. Oh, you wanted your parking location? Sorry, the latest news from TMZ bumped that off the list. Your morning commute notification didn't happen because we thought you'd be more interested in local theater listings at 8 AM on a Wednesday. Sure, we can tell you that your flight was delayed after snooping through your email to know all your travel info, but it won't do you any good because you'll already be in the TSA grope line by the time the airline even admits the possibility of the flight being delayed.
Then Google Now got killed off in favor of just being part of the Google "app". In the latest Android versions I believe you swipe to one screen left of the leftmost homescreen to get to it. I don't know because I don't use that shit. I do know you have even less effective control over it than you had over Google Now, and it's more of a pain in the ass to disable because it's more deeply integrated into the Google "app", which is basically a search bar slapped onto Chrome plus the always listening agent that feeds all of your audio to HQ. (And Google's voice assistant is a joke. Bitch will ask you "Which application?" but will NEVER actually react to your response despite showing that it recognized it, as evidenced by the text at the top appearing correctly.)
Your email system has a quota?
Make an alt coin based on neural net / deep learning / AI bullshit. (NeuralCoin, DeepCoin, AICoin, etc. probably all already exist).
If you can reach out to another host, then you're on a network.
If you can reach out to a host not on your network, then you're reaching to a different network.
This means the separate networks are interconnected. An "internet" if you will.
You may need to find a way to route data around.
The "web" is nothing more than the internet + a way to discover and navigate hosts and services.