Whenever they damn well please. Ethereum is a joke. I'm convinced "proof of stake" was a supposed to be the over-the-top absurdity in Ethereum put in just to clue even the dumbest people in on the fact that it's a joke. But people are still buying into it!
Feminism and other political nonsense have also infected the show. I hate when politics infect a show. I groan every time I get slapped in the face with political correctness, feminism, etc. It destroys the show.
Feminism: the belief that women should be treated equal to men.
So you're saying if a woman is treated equal to a man on a show it destroys the show? A show is only worth watching if women are treated like crap? OK... whatever floats your boat.
Feminism half a century ago was like that. "Feminism" today is a farce. It's so bad they had to retcon the whole thing and label feminism as "First Wave" feminism. Feminists of that era widely criticize and deride modern "Third Wave" "feminism" because it's lost the plot so badly. (With social media and the craziness it fuels, are we now in "Fourth Wave" "feminism"?)
Have you ever actually tried to help Mozilla / Firefox? Have you ever filed a bug report or commented on one?
Every time I have, Mozilla's goons either:
1 - Report it as a dupe of a related issue that was closed (closed as fixed, closed as won't fix / feature request, or closed as being a dupe of yet some other one).
2 - Close it as fixed without fixing it. Often, the issues marked as fixed are not actually fixed, or were fixed but have reappeared (what you're trying to report before getting marked as a dupe, see above).
3 - Close it as won't fix / feature request and lock the comments (see above). These are often issues where people are complaining that FF's latest change or injection of some bullshit no one wants has broken basic functionality and the mods on their bug tracker just stick their fingers in their ears and scream "LALALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" before locking the comments and marking everything as dupes that ultimately trace back to some completely unrelated issue.
4 - Report it as a dupe of a completely unrelated issue and chastise you for not using the broken and unwieldy search to find issues unrelated to what you're trying to report.
In a filing to the Supreme Court, the Trump administration said the question for the court was "whether the now-superseded 2015 order was invalid because it exceeded the FCC's statutory authority, was arbitrary and capricious, was promulgated without adequate public notice, or violated the First Amendment."
Sounds like they want clarification on how, exactly, the FCC fucked up so they can use that against them in the future.
I don't know what they have planned because I haven't been paying attention.
But in my book "space" starts well above the ISS. If they're just going up to that height and coming down, they're not going to space. You have to leave the magnetosphere.
Hipsters... buying hipster coffee... with hipster money... using their hipster phones... so they can sit their with their hipster Macbooks... using their hipster apps to post pictures to hipster social media... so that other fucking hipsters spending their hipster money in hipster coffee shops can all knowingly nod their hipster beards in what passes as a hipster gesture of approval before posting their own hipster drivel.
It's mother fucking hipsters all the way down, I tell 'ya.
Let me guess... you disliked hipsters before it was cool to dislike hipsters.
Impossible. It was always cool to dislike hipsters.
When this happened, the human volunteers were likely to refuse to turn the bot off. Of the 43 volunteers who heard Nao's pleas, 13 refused. And the remaining 30 took, on average, twice as long to comply compared to those who did not not hear the desperate cries at all.
1: 13 / 43 is less than half. That is not "likely".
2: Taking twice as long is probably a result of spending time hearing/reading the robot's pleas, laughing, and waiting to see if there was more to the joke.
3: The 13 who refused to turn it off probably did so because at that point they knew it was a test to see how they would act toward a helpful entity they had just engaged with. I'd wager most of them had heard of the tests involving triggering simulated shocks on the orders of someone else despite the receiver being in obvious pain or danger.
If you want to draw a real conclusion - how many tried to rescue the robot and break it out of the facility?
You make no sense. Anyone in a block chain can manage their own database if they want to track that shit. It doesn't have to be a central database. You can requiring signing for all messages in any form of database. You don't need block chain for message signing. You can have distributed copies of anything you want.
because it is difficult to agree on one central authority to store all the data. it is also insecure to have one authority. blockchain is a sort o distributed database - it's just a superior solution that is standardised, without counterparty risk and entirely in the cloud. why design some new solution when these things have already been figured out? there are many blockchain companies working on global supply chains - some prefer more centralised solutions and some less.
No. Stupid. Dumb. Stop. Shut the fuck up.
Text file. Product code. Serial. Location. Date. Some form of newline character (LF, CR, or both - I don't care). Hell, make it XML for all I fucking care. Sign it with a private key.
Let anyone in the world mirror it. Let anyone in the world throw it into a proper DB if they want to actively work with it.
Want to provide an API to access it? HTTP GET. Or maybe host your own database and let the world connect to it.
Block chains solve ZERO problems. Distributed block chains solve ONE problem. You don't need a distributed block chain to solve this problem. You need distribution. Public distributed block chains solve TWO problems. You don't need a public distributed block chain to solve these problems. You need public distribution.
Need? Nothing. Then again you don't need a hybrid drive train adding more than 10% of the base cost to the car, that you then have to pay additional tax on.
I'm holding 4 $305p 8/3s at 16.98ea. The fourth contract was bought on margin by accident during the fiasco this morning. I'm going bankrupt.
How does it result in him going bankrupt? TSLA is 349.54. If he's short 4 at $305 a piece with a date of 8/3 that he paid $16.98 each for the privilege of, then he stands to lose:
4 * (349.54 - 305 + 16.98) = 246.08 tomorrow if the price stays the same.
Am I just not parsing his line correctly? Or is he a clown that can be wiped out by such a small loss?
Hey look, someone who read and understood the argument!
I don't know if the argument is true. It makes sense, but I haven't seen how the numbers wash out. However, the people bitching here don't even understand the argument.
And Trump only won due to a fluke in our electoral system that neither the Russians, nor anyone else, predicted.
It's not a fluke. It's a feature. It's by design. This is a union of states.
Further, many people did predict it. They were laughed at and ridiculed, but they were correct.
I myself thought Trump had no fucking chance. I thought Wolf Blitzer was going to have a short night as Hillary was going to be crowned faster than any other President. Nope! To watch it all slowly unfold, and to watch the news anchors admit to it even more slowly, was bizarre. Imagine being a fly on the wall in Hillary's dugout as it happened. Hell, she couldn't even come out and face her supporters to concede (not that I would have expected her to have a speech ready). She sent her lackey out to mumble about this going on into the night, so please go home.
Slashdot Mirror
when will they decide arbitrarily to do it again?
Whenever they damn well please. Ethereum is a joke. I'm convinced "proof of stake" was a supposed to be the over-the-top absurdity in Ethereum put in just to clue even the dumbest people in on the fact that it's a joke. But people are still buying into it!
Feminism and other political nonsense have also infected the show. I hate when politics infect a show. I groan every time I get slapped in the face with political correctness, feminism, etc. It destroys the show.
Feminism: the belief that women should be treated equal to men.
So you're saying if a woman is treated equal to a man on a show it destroys the show? A show is only worth watching if women are treated like crap? OK... whatever floats your boat.
Feminism half a century ago was like that. "Feminism" today is a farce. It's so bad they had to retcon the whole thing and label feminism as "First Wave" feminism. Feminists of that era widely criticize and deride modern "Third Wave" "feminism" because it's lost the plot so badly. (With social media and the craziness it fuels, are we now in "Fourth Wave" "feminism"?)
But don't they force you to PAY for it? The BBC is government-run, isn't it?
Balderdash.
Then as you get older they become the same old thing over and over again.
By the time you reach your 50's and 60's such media is considered threatening to your way of life.
Pick one. Either it's always been the same old shit or it's new and scary and threatening to your old way of life.
No, it fucking doesn't.
A SPECIES is a type of living thing that has SPECIALIZED itself in some SPECIFIC way.
That's what you get for using Windows 10!
Have you ever actually tried to help Mozilla / Firefox? Have you ever filed a bug report or commented on one?
Every time I have, Mozilla's goons either:
1 - Report it as a dupe of a related issue that was closed (closed as fixed, closed as won't fix / feature request, or closed as being a dupe of yet some other one).
2 - Close it as fixed without fixing it. Often, the issues marked as fixed are not actually fixed, or were fixed but have reappeared (what you're trying to report before getting marked as a dupe, see above).
3 - Close it as won't fix / feature request and lock the comments (see above). These are often issues where people are complaining that FF's latest change or injection of some bullshit no one wants has broken basic functionality and the mods on their bug tracker just stick their fingers in their ears and scream "LALALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" before locking the comments and marking everything as dupes that ultimately trace back to some completely unrelated issue.
4 - Report it as a dupe of a completely unrelated issue and chastise you for not using the broken and unwieldy search to find issues unrelated to what you're trying to report.
It's BeauHD, certified piece of shit.
Yes. This is what I was alluding to.
In a filing to the Supreme Court, the Trump administration said the question for the court was "whether the now-superseded 2015 order was invalid because it exceeded the FCC's statutory authority, was arbitrary and capricious, was promulgated without adequate public notice, or violated the First Amendment."
Sounds like they want clarification on how, exactly, the FCC fucked up so they can use that against them in the future.
I don't know what they have planned because I haven't been paying attention.
But in my book "space" starts well above the ISS. If they're just going up to that height and coming down, they're not going to space. You have to leave the magnetosphere.
Hipsters ... buying hipster coffee ... with hipster money ... using their hipster phones ... so they can sit their with their hipster Macbooks ... using their hipster apps to post pictures to hipster social media ... so that other fucking hipsters spending their hipster money in hipster coffee shops can all knowingly nod their hipster beards in what passes as a hipster gesture of approval before posting their own hipster drivel.
It's mother fucking hipsters all the way down, I tell 'ya.
Let me guess... you disliked hipsters before it was cool to dislike hipsters.
Impossible. It was always cool to dislike hipsters.
When this happened, the human volunteers were likely to refuse to turn the bot off. Of the 43 volunteers who heard Nao's pleas, 13 refused. And the remaining 30 took, on average, twice as long to comply compared to those who did not not hear the desperate cries at all.
1: 13 / 43 is less than half. That is not "likely".
2: Taking twice as long is probably a result of spending time hearing/reading the robot's pleas, laughing, and waiting to see if there was more to the joke.
3: The 13 who refused to turn it off probably did so because at that point they knew it was a test to see how they would act toward a helpful entity they had just engaged with. I'd wager most of them had heard of the tests involving triggering simulated shocks on the orders of someone else despite the receiver being in obvious pain or danger.
If you want to draw a real conclusion - how many tried to rescue the robot and break it out of the facility?
You make no sense.
Anyone in a block chain can manage their own database if they want to track that shit. It doesn't have to be a central database.
You can requiring signing for all messages in any form of database. You don't need block chain for message signing.
You can have distributed copies of anything you want.
because it is difficult to agree on one central authority to store all the data. it is also insecure to have one authority. blockchain is a sort o distributed database - it's just a superior solution that is standardised, without counterparty risk and entirely in the cloud. why design some new solution when these things have already been figured out? there are many blockchain companies working on global supply chains - some prefer more centralised solutions and some less.
No. Stupid. Dumb. Stop. Shut the fuck up.
Text file.
Product code.
Serial.
Location.
Date.
Some form of newline character (LF, CR, or both - I don't care). Hell, make it XML for all I fucking care.
Sign it with a private key.
Let anyone in the world mirror it.
Let anyone in the world throw it into a proper DB if they want to actively work with it.
Want to provide an API to access it? HTTP GET. Or maybe host your own database and let the world connect to it.
Block chains solve ZERO problems.
Distributed block chains solve ONE problem. You don't need a distributed block chain to solve this problem. You need distribution.
Public distributed block chains solve TWO problems. You don't need a public distributed block chain to solve these problems. You need public distribution.
Need? Nothing. Then again you don't need a hybrid drive train adding more than 10% of the base cost to the car, that you then have to pay additional tax on.
I'm holding 4 $305p 8/3s at 16.98ea. The fourth contract was bought on margin by accident during the fiasco this morning. I'm going bankrupt.
How does it result in him going bankrupt?
TSLA is 349.54. If he's short 4 at $305 a piece with a date of 8/3 that he paid $16.98 each for the privilege of, then he stands to lose:
4 * (349.54 - 305 + 16.98) = 246.08 tomorrow if the price stays the same.
Am I just not parsing his line correctly? Or is he a clown that can be wiped out by such a small loss?
Talking to someone using your voice? That's a micro aggression.
A hybrid Fit model would be over 20 grand easily. The regular Fit gets up there if you choose anything but the bare bones, poor person package.
Honda tried a pure electric Fit in (model year) 2014, but they abandoned it.
Hey look, someone who read and understood the argument!
I don't know if the argument is true. It makes sense, but I haven't seen how the numbers wash out. However, the people bitching here don't even understand the argument.
despite that said premise is not yet supported by hard evidence.
It is supported by hard evidence, but it points to Hillary and the DNC being behind it all.
Seems to me you wouldn't pass your own proposed "emotional/mental stability testing" and you wouldn't be allowed to vote.
And Trump only won due to a fluke in our electoral system that neither the Russians, nor anyone else, predicted.
It's not a fluke. It's a feature. It's by design. This is a union of states.
Further, many people did predict it. They were laughed at and ridiculed, but they were correct.
I myself thought Trump had no fucking chance. I thought Wolf Blitzer was going to have a short night as Hillary was going to be crowned faster than any other President. Nope! To watch it all slowly unfold, and to watch the news anchors admit to it even more slowly, was bizarre. Imagine being a fly on the wall in Hillary's dugout as it happened. Hell, she couldn't even come out and face her supporters to concede (not that I would have expected her to have a speech ready). She sent her lackey out to mumble about this going on into the night, so please go home.
I expected Trump's victory speech to mirror Sideshow Bob's - https://www.youtube.com/watch?... .
Oh look, it's the NYT crying about the Russians again!
F A K E
N E W S
You're under the assumption that fish don't reproduce. I've got some news for you.
If we consumed *all* the fish in the ocean in one year, as the GP stated, which fish in said ocean would be left to reproduce?
The fish you consumed in the second half of the year.