When someone tells you something is "countless", it usually means they want you to believe it's sufficiently many to accept their argument, but have no evidence to back that up.
How many people would this actually save? What is the potential for abuse?
Blame / fault / culpability for harming you: Whomever harmed you. Responsibility for your well-being: You.
It's not "victim blaming" to say people should be responsible and prevent these situations. Imprisoning a murderer or shaming people as "victim blamers" won't make anyone less dead.
Devils Advocate, don't get all mad at me. What if Monsanto had submitted the paper under its own name? Would it stand a chance at being published? Would anyone actual take it seriously? It sounds nefarious, but what if they actually wanted what they view as legitimate information to be actually read by someone?
If you want your research to be read, the last thing you do is submit it for peer review in a respected journal.
You're claiming conservatives want to not hire/serve certain people despite what the law says, then you're mocking them for expecting the law to be upheld. What's next - you're going to laugh at people who are against certain taxes for using the things funded by those taxes after being forced to pay those taxes?
The bot pretending to be an editor by the name of msmash did it again. If you scroll down on a reuters.com article and have a shitty modern browser, the site uses shitty javashit to change the URL without actually causing a navigating event for the active viewport.
They won't get in trouble because he is a white male.
They won't get in trouble because they technically have done nothing wrong. They fired a guy for not having the right political view point which, as I understand it, is not protected in the US like it is elsewhere.
The ironic thing is that they are missing the entire point of diversity which is that a disparate collection of world views leads to finding better ideas and solutions to problems. To put it in terms familiar to Slashdot it's like the Federation and the Borg and Google just showed they are the Borg.
It's illegal in California. Further, they fired him after he complained about hiring practices, gender bias, etc. within the company. That's retaliatory, and that's illegal everywhere. The cherry on top is that his claims count as whistleblowing because it's illegal to have hiring, assignment, and overall treatment favor race, gender, age, etc.
If Google was smart, they'd fire him for no reason, officially. Stating a reason opens you up to someone calling you out on that bullshit.
Further, when was the last time you had HR training? An incident like this doesn't rise to the standard of creating a hostile work environment. The legal test is that an isolated incident needs to be severe or egregious. For a pattern of incidents or a chronic issue, you need a documented history of the problem over time and the people that were targeted.
The dude writing that essay doesn't meet the standard for creating a hostile work environment. Further, once his employer becomes aware of an issue (he in fact is reporting on an issue), they are barred from any sort of retaliation. Complaining about hiring practices, gender bias, etc. in your company and then getting fired for it is a big fucking no-no on the part of Google.
The only hope Google has is to prove that this guy made his claims in bad faith and was out to get the company from the start.
Yet here we are. How many breaches do you hear about where passwords were stored in plaintext? Or where hashes were just MD5? Or where no salt was used?
How many companies get punished for not giving a shit?
I can and do memorize 16 random characters for many passwords.
And regardless, the issue isn't remembering one password, it's dozens (or hundreds). Passwords need to be unique to be secure, thus the problem of them being hard to remember applies equally to either scheme. So you use a password manager.
Anyone not using a password manager is doing it incorrectly.
"It" is being passed your current password when logging in. "It" can choose to do whatever it wants to with it, including broadcast it to the world. If "it" wants to keep it unhashed in memory for a while to make sure you don't do something stupid when choosing a new password, "it" certainly can.
A standard US keyboard has 96 symbols on it. A lot of systems won't let you use space or tab, or a handful of other characters for some reason. Call it 90.
An 11-character random password using a 90-character alphabet beats out a 4-word password from a dictionary of 170,000 words. The 170,000 word dictionary scheme has the additional problems of many passwords being identical (the meat sucks hit | them eat suck shit) and many of the passwords being too long to be used (a shitty limitation, yes, but a real one).
Regardless of what scheme you're going with, you need to remember multiple, unique, random passwords. You're going to want a password manager. Why not choose the generation scheme that's shorter, faster to type, and more secure?
Dictionary-based passwords are absolutely fucking retarded.
How DARE you demand that climate scientists perform actual science?! Experimentation is hard! We have to rely on models that haven't predicted a damn fucking thing, ever! We HAVE to "adjust" the temperature data because they data is WRONG. We KNOW the data is wrong because it doesn't fit the model.
The U. S. of A. has only declared war formally 5 times after the revolution. The U. S. of A. has never declared war on Korea. That shitfest was all at the behest of the U.N., with Americans providing nearly all of the meat for the grinder.
What if I want to drive more than 500 miles in a day?
Stop for lunch on the way?
I'm failing to see the problem.
The stopping is the problem. It takes less than 8 hours to go 500 miles in most of the country. 7 hours with the way most people drive.
I'd rather keep driving and just have some jerky or other snacks while in the car. Even stopping for gas (or an imaginary battery swap) is an annoying time sink. When I'm on a drive that long my first priority is minimizing the overall duration of the trip.
AMD is still contracted with GlobalFoundries (which was previously completely owned by AMD) for CPU production. Hynix makes the HBM2 chips for their Vega GPUs. Samsung and TSMC get overflow and second bidding.
AMD is targeting 7nm with GloFo for 2018 on a "performance" node (the Zen architecture is on the "low power" node). If this pans out, late 2018 and early 2019 will be very interesting.
Further, Intel doesn't earn money by leasing its manufacturing out to others (I believe they actually do some of this now, but it's a drop in the bucket). Intel makes money by cutting out the middle man (the 3rd party fab) and selling their chips at high prices, keeping all of the profit.
What's happening now is AMD is coming out with many-core chips that scale perfectly. Intel can't make many-core chips without sacrificing clock speed and throttling to shit. AMD is still at a significant disadvantage when it comes to single threaded performance. But for most people the performance is more than adequate, the price is great, and the multi threaded performance is amazing. You also get the stability of an AMD platform (no need to change motherboards and sockets every 6 weeks), and you don't get the "fuck you"s that Intel loves to dish out (restrictive number of PCIe lanes, heat spreaders with paste instead of solder, anti-overclocking behavior and lockouts, etc.).
My understanding is this eclipse should be blocking a good deal of the sun all over the continental US. So no matter where you are, you're going to have a pretty damn good show. Go buy your eclipse viewing glasses.
Fuck glasses. I just wait until the eclipse happens to look at it.
Next on the list is that she has never seen Star Wars. And I need to figure out what order to introduce it to her in. I am thinking. Rogue one episodes 4,5,6, 7 Then 1,2,3 for a bit of campy background
4, 5, 6, Ewok Christmas Special, Safe Sex PSA, done.
I came here to laff at your folly and ridicule you heavily, but harperska got you good so I'll keep it short.
Book nerds would be pretentious assholes about ASOIAF, not GOT. What does that make you? You're not a pretentious GoT asshole, or a pretentious "the books are better, have you even read the books?" asshole, you're just an asshole.
The "advanced persistent threat" is the outside actor trying to get in, the angry employee, etc. Command and control software has 2 components - command and control. You install the control portion on the victim machines, and command them from the outside. In some cases the control portion contains a chunk of the command portion as well, to ensure a decentralized, resilient network of pwned boxen.
Slashdot Mirror
When someone tells you something is "countless", it usually means they want you to believe it's sufficiently many to accept their argument, but have no evidence to back that up.
How many people would this actually save?
What is the potential for abuse?
Blame / fault / culpability for harming you: Whomever harmed you.
Responsibility for your well-being: You.
It's not "victim blaming" to say people should be responsible and prevent these situations.
Imprisoning a murderer or shaming people as "victim blamers" won't make anyone less dead.
Devils Advocate, don't get all mad at me. What if Monsanto had submitted the paper under its own name? Would it stand a chance at being published? Would anyone actual take it seriously? It sounds nefarious, but what if they actually wanted what they view as legitimate information to be actually read by someone?
If you want your research to be read, the last thing you do is submit it for peer review in a respected journal.
Hypocrisy? That's you.
You're claiming conservatives want to not hire/serve certain people despite what the law says, then you're mocking them for expecting the law to be upheld.
What's next - you're going to laugh at people who are against certain taxes for using the things funded by those taxes after being forced to pay those taxes?
Get a brain, moran.
The bot pretending to be an editor by the name of msmash did it again.
If you scroll down on a reuters.com article and have a shitty modern browser, the site uses shitty javashit to change the URL without actually causing a navigating event for the active viewport.
Google may not have a choice if the feds/Trump want to send a message.
Clicking the Amazon Associates stripe to get an affiliate link to spam on Slashdot doesn't count as "computer programming".
They won't get in trouble because he is a white male.
They won't get in trouble because they technically have done nothing wrong. They fired a guy for not having the right political view point which, as I understand it, is not protected in the US like it is elsewhere.
The ironic thing is that they are missing the entire point of diversity which is that a disparate collection of world views leads to finding better ideas and solutions to problems. To put it in terms familiar to Slashdot it's like the Federation and the Borg and Google just showed they are the Borg.
It's illegal in California.
Further, they fired him after he complained about hiring practices, gender bias, etc. within the company. That's retaliatory, and that's illegal everywhere.
The cherry on top is that his claims count as whistleblowing because it's illegal to have hiring, assignment, and overall treatment favor race, gender, age, etc.
Checkmate.
If Google was smart, they'd fire him for no reason, officially.
Stating a reason opens you up to someone calling you out on that bullshit.
Further, when was the last time you had HR training? An incident like this doesn't rise to the standard of creating a hostile work environment. The legal test is that an isolated incident needs to be severe or egregious. For a pattern of incidents or a chronic issue, you need a documented history of the problem over time and the people that were targeted.
The dude writing that essay doesn't meet the standard for creating a hostile work environment. Further, once his employer becomes aware of an issue (he in fact is reporting on an issue), they are barred from any sort of retaliation. Complaining about hiring practices, gender bias, etc. in your company and then getting fired for it is a big fucking no-no on the part of Google.
The only hope Google has is to prove that this guy made his claims in bad faith and was out to get the company from the start.
Yet here we are. How many breaches do you hear about where passwords were stored in plaintext? Or where hashes were just MD5? Or where no salt was used?
How many companies get punished for not giving a shit?
I can and do memorize 16 random characters for many passwords.
And regardless, the issue isn't remembering one password, it's dozens (or hundreds).
Passwords need to be unique to be secure, thus the problem of them being hard to remember applies equally to either scheme. So you use a password manager.
Anyone not using a password manager is doing it incorrectly.
"It" is being passed your current password when logging in. "It" can choose to do whatever it wants to with it, including broadcast it to the world.
If "it" wants to keep it unhashed in memory for a while to make sure you don't do something stupid when choosing a new password, "it" certainly can.
A standard US keyboard has 96 symbols on it. A lot of systems won't let you use space or tab, or a handful of other characters for some reason. Call it 90.
An 11-character random password using a 90-character alphabet beats out a 4-word password from a dictionary of 170,000 words.
The 170,000 word dictionary scheme has the additional problems of many passwords being identical (the meat sucks hit | them eat suck shit) and many of the passwords being too long to be used (a shitty limitation, yes, but a real one).
Regardless of what scheme you're going with, you need to remember multiple, unique, random passwords. You're going to want a password manager.
Why not choose the generation scheme that's shorter, faster to type, and more secure?
Dictionary-based passwords are absolutely fucking retarded.
Nononono
THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED
You're a DENIER
How DARE you demand that climate scientists perform actual science?! Experimentation is hard! We have to rely on models that haven't predicted a damn fucking thing, ever! We HAVE to "adjust" the temperature data because they data is WRONG. We KNOW the data is wrong because it doesn't fit the model.
You mean the Korean Conflict.
The U. S. of A. has only declared war formally 5 times after the revolution.
The U. S. of A. has never declared war on Korea. That shitfest was all at the behest of the U.N., with Americans providing nearly all of the meat for the grinder.
Stop for lunch on the way?
I'm failing to see the problem.
The stopping is the problem.
It takes less than 8 hours to go 500 miles in most of the country. 7 hours with the way most people drive.
I'd rather keep driving and just have some jerky or other snacks while in the car. Even stopping for gas (or an imaginary battery swap) is an annoying time sink. When I'm on a drive that long my first priority is minimizing the overall duration of the trip.
No, the troll for this says "my DAMN balls".
They've even doubled down on the "up to" for clock speeds.
There's a base clock, TurboBoost 2.0 clock, and a TurboBoost 3.0 clock.
To be fair, AMD does the same thing now, I believe, with the base clock, all core turbo clock, and max, single core turbo clock.
Seems to me he's got it pegged exactly.
AMD is still contracted with GlobalFoundries (which was previously completely owned by AMD) for CPU production.
Hynix makes the HBM2 chips for their Vega GPUs.
Samsung and TSMC get overflow and second bidding.
AMD is targeting 7nm with GloFo for 2018 on a "performance" node (the Zen architecture is on the "low power" node). If this pans out, late 2018 and early 2019 will be very interesting.
Further, Intel doesn't earn money by leasing its manufacturing out to others (I believe they actually do some of this now, but it's a drop in the bucket). Intel makes money by cutting out the middle man (the 3rd party fab) and selling their chips at high prices, keeping all of the profit.
What's happening now is AMD is coming out with many-core chips that scale perfectly. Intel can't make many-core chips without sacrificing clock speed and throttling to shit. AMD is still at a significant disadvantage when it comes to single threaded performance. But for most people the performance is more than adequate, the price is great, and the multi threaded performance is amazing. You also get the stability of an AMD platform (no need to change motherboards and sockets every 6 weeks), and you don't get the "fuck you"s that Intel loves to dish out (restrictive number of PCIe lanes, heat spreaders with paste instead of solder, anti-overclocking behavior and lockouts, etc.).
My understanding is this eclipse should be blocking a good deal of the sun all over the continental US. So no matter where you are, you're going to have a pretty damn good show. Go buy your eclipse viewing glasses.
Fuck glasses. I just wait until the eclipse happens to look at it.
Worked out so well when we went into Iraq a second time with proof of WMDs.
The public absolutely needs to be shown proof before the country goes to war.
We haven't had an actual reason to go to actual war since WWII.
Next on the list is that she has never seen Star Wars. And I need to figure out what order to introduce it to her in. I am thinking. Rogue one episodes 4,5,6, 7 Then 1,2,3 for a bit of campy background
4, 5, 6, Ewok Christmas Special, Safe Sex PSA, done.
I came here to laff at your folly and ridicule you heavily, but harperska got you good so I'll keep it short.
Book nerds would be pretentious assholes about ASOIAF, not GOT. What does that make you? You're not a pretentious GoT asshole, or a pretentious "the books are better, have you even read the books?" asshole, you're just an asshole.
Damn, u wrong.
The "advanced persistent threat" is the outside actor trying to get in, the angry employee, etc.
Command and control software has 2 components - command and control. You install the control portion on the victim machines, and command them from the outside. In some cases the control portion contains a chunk of the command portion as well, to ensure a decentralized, resilient network of pwned boxen.