Open and use a shared mailbox in Outlook 2016 and Outlook 2013 Applies To: Outlook 2016 Outlook 2013 Office for business Office 365 Admin More...
A shared mailbox can be a practical solution for any business with groups of people working from different locations. With the right permissions, any person in a group can access a shared mailbox that appears in their address book. The shared mailbox is automatically available in the Folder pane in Outlook.
Note: A Microsoft Exchange Server account is required to use this feature. For more information, see What is a Microsoft Exchange Server account?
Only admins can create a shared mailbox and give users permissions to the shared mailbox. If you want to open a shared mailbox using Outlook on the web or Outlook Web App instead of Outlook, see Open and use a shared mailbox in Outlook Web App.
I hate MS plenty, but let's not resort to bullshit.
Directly underneath the opening paragraph which you bitched about is a note stating you need Exchange. After that there's a paragraph explaining that only admins can set them up for use in Outlook. They also have a link to another article for people who are using Outlook on the web or the "web app".
Further down the page is a more complete description. It's basically "If your admin gave you access, it shows up.".
ISP jerked me around for weeks reseting my modem which showed noisy / lossy line. Then they made me drive to an office of theirs to switch modems, new modem had same problem as old modem of course. Finally I posted on newly created twitter account with just the right hashtag to put my tweet in stream with their marketing spew, and presto, tech came and ran a new line (old one chewed up by squirrels) within 48 hours.
No you fucking aren't. Either shit or get off the pot. What, are you holding out for "change" (your preferred party winning) in the midterm elections? I mean, that's just a little over a year away! And if that doesn't pan out, well, it'll've been been 2 years. Surely the investigators are about to open the flood gates on info that will get the President impeached, and if not, you're about half way through their reign. Might as well stick it out and "make a difference" in the following Presidential election, right?
Quit kidding yourself. You're not leaving. And the President, however much of a buffoon and ass they may be, has very little impact on your day to day life. It's congress that you need to flush down the drain, yet none of you give a shit about midterm elections. You just want to whine and bitch and moan and blame someone for something, as long as you're not blaming yourself or your preferred party.
The above applies to all politards of all parties.
FYI: The word "further" is ambiguous in this context. Most American English speakers interpret it one way, and most British English speakers interpret it the other. As a result, there are endless flame wars on Slashdot about which interpretation is correct.
In this case, the argument is whether the original phrase "our available resources would stretch 10x further" by Baron_Yam means "10x" or "+10x" (i.e. "11x"). The grandparent AC is pointing out the correct wording for the alternate interpretation: "+9x" (i.e. "10x").
I'll let you decide which one you think is correct. Personally I think the only winning move is not to play == don't use the word further/farther, and just say "10x." That way everybody understands what you mean.
No, it's not ambiguous, and it doesn't matter which side of "the pond" you're from.
There's a multiplicative component and an additive component. The multiplicative component comes from the word "times", the additive component comes from the word "further".
10 is 1 times greater than 5. 10 = 1*(5) + 5 10 is 2 times 5. 10 = 2*5 10 is 100% more than 5. 10 = (100/100) * (5) + 5 10 is 200% of 5. 10 = (200/100) * 5
Note that if there's no value after "times", "percent", etc., the object being compared to is implied as the relative basis. X is Y times (Z) greater than Z.
The only reason this is an issue is because people like to bastardize math and statistics to lie. "Our product is 120% faster!" really means "Our product is 20% faster.". "Our product costs 2 times less!" really means "Our product costs half!" or "Their product costs one time more than ours.".
Idiot. Planned Parenthood is the problem not the solution. Look at the numbers. Birth control is 99% effective. Pretty good huh? That means that 1 out of 100 times you have intercourse it will result in pregnancy. So if you have sex a single time, once a week, you're good for two years before it fails and you get pregnant. If you are a more normal individual and have sex multiple times several times a week... well there's a reason so many women on birth control have to get abortions. You really want to prevent pregnancy? Then don't have sex.
Birth control is much closer to 99.9% effective when used properly.
And the published failure rates tend to be for use throughout a year. So if a particular brand of pill claims 99.8% effectiveness, then 0.2% percent of users in a given year can expect to get preggerz, assuming they use it properly.
We all know how Rich Democrats feel about, "The Help".
Right... and Rich Republicans are so much more empathetic towards "The Help".
Conservatives and religious people donate more money (a higher percentage of their income/assets, not just in terms of raw dollars) to charities and non-profits than liberals and atheists.
I don't know whether or not they feel smug when doing so.
No medical "authority" claims that sex reassignment surgery changes a person's sex. If you're not able to engage in sexual reproduction as a male/female, then you're not really male/female, are you?
And yes, classically, children and post-menopausal women were considered differently. Boys and girls were often dressed and treated the same. Post-menopausal women were crones. That's not an insult - a crone could range from being considered a wise, respected member of society, or a crazy old cat lady depending on the person.
But hey, if you want to let political retards hijack the actual meanings of words, go right ahead. I've even seen them get their hooks into bees. They're not drones anymore, they're "females" now, despite the fact that bees don't work that way at all. You need that sweet, sweet royal jelly to be a queen bee. I mean, who are they to assume a bee's sex anyway?!
You can use quotation marks all you want. He was elected. He is the current President of the United States of America. You don't have to like it, but lets face i t- the "vocal minority" has been dictating the nation's policy and direction for decades.
Agree. Why should tech CEO's or celebrities be a better source of general political ideas than Joe Sixpack? Opinions are like assholes: everyone has one.
Because these particular assholes have agendas and PR images. Everything they do publicly is to bolster their PR image and further their agendas.
Their agendas include gaining wealth and gaining power, not helping the common man. In fact, screwing the common man is a common tactic.
Everybody dies. Some people get dealt a shitty hand. If you can't run with the pack, too bad. We can't drag the rest of society down for a handful of unfit (or stupid) people. Cold and heartless? Sure.
Can we force people who don't want to get vaccinated in order to indirectly protect the people who can't get vaccinated? I say hell fucking no. If people has baseless fears about vaccines, a general distrust of the government and corporations pushing them, or just plain don't want to, that's their fucking right. If other people are so infirm that the existence of unvaccinated people poses a threat to them, too bad.
Disease and death are the natural state of things, and we will never win that war. The majority of society needs to progress forward without being anchored by either group, but also without violating their rights (forced vaccines or euthanasia).
For every disease we eradicate, a new one will fill the void anyway. Nature abhors a vacuum, after all.
As a Californian, I read the same thing. As someone who went through the California public school system decades ago, I can tell you that schools funded this shit. They had "medical providers" do the doing, but it was on the school's dime. And in the case of shit like scoliosis checks, the "medical providers" were the lunch ladies who received 4 minutes of training.
The psychological and psychiatric professional communities overwhelmingly disagree with this. There is a disorder related to transgenderism, but not all transgendered people have the disorder.
No they don't. Most don't even recognize transgenderism / transexualism as anything but a symptom of mental disorder. Dial back the clock a few decades and look at homosexuals were considered. That's how the trans group is regarded today, by professionals.
One sperm is not enough, unless you're making a test tube baby. In the normal method, you need plenty of sperm to reach the egg and smash down the gates before a single sperm can get inside.
Slashdot Mirror
But mIRC let you slap people around a bit with a large trout.
You got whooshed, yes.
But even writing "Hello World" in assembly takes forever.
Nice try, liar.
Open and use a shared mailbox in Outlook 2016 and Outlook 2013
Applies To: Outlook 2016 Outlook 2013 Office for business Office 365 Admin More...
A shared mailbox can be a practical solution for any business with groups of people working from different locations. With the right permissions, any person in a group can access a shared mailbox that appears in their address book. The shared mailbox is automatically available in the Folder pane in Outlook.
Note: A Microsoft Exchange Server account is required to use this feature. For more information, see What is a Microsoft Exchange Server account?
Only admins can create a shared mailbox and give users permissions to the shared mailbox. If you want to open a shared mailbox using Outlook on the web or Outlook Web App instead of Outlook, see Open and use a shared mailbox in Outlook Web App.
I hate MS plenty, but let's not resort to bullshit.
Directly underneath the opening paragraph which you bitched about is a note stating you need Exchange. After that there's a paragraph explaining that only admins can set them up for use in Outlook. They also have a link to another article for people who are using Outlook on the web or the "web app".
Further down the page is a more complete description. It's basically "If your admin gave you access, it shows up.".
ISP jerked me around for weeks reseting my modem which showed noisy / lossy line. Then they made me drive to an office of theirs to switch modems, new modem had same problem as old modem of course. Finally I posted on newly created twitter account with just the right hashtag to put my tweet in stream with their marketing spew, and presto, tech came and ran a new line (old one chewed up by squirrels) within 48 hours.
So now you know what to do.....
Kill the squirrels?
Yes, and as the President has demonstrated, it is an open platform to make yourself look like an ASS
It is not surprise to me that NOBODY wants to make themselves into a public spectacle like the Jack-ass in Chief does
NOBODY but the few million Twitter users.
(I believe they may have 100 million real accounts, but the number of active users is definitely far less.)
i am still considering leaving the nation.
No you fucking aren't. Either shit or get off the pot.
What, are you holding out for "change" (your preferred party winning) in the midterm elections? I mean, that's just a little over a year away!
And if that doesn't pan out, well, it'll've been been 2 years. Surely the investigators are about to open the flood gates on info that will get the President impeached, and if not, you're about half way through their reign. Might as well stick it out and "make a difference" in the following Presidential election, right?
Quit kidding yourself. You're not leaving. And the President, however much of a buffoon and ass they may be, has very little impact on your day to day life. It's congress that you need to flush down the drain, yet none of you give a shit about midterm elections. You just want to whine and bitch and moan and blame someone for something, as long as you're not blaming yourself or your preferred party.
The above applies to all politards of all parties.
Twitter died when it appointed a "trust and safety council".
.@Twitter Perfect digital rep of empty head sounds like when it rattles. Ill take this op2nity 2 point out ths post would make a good tweet.
SMT is "simultaneous multi-threading", not "symmetrical multi-threading".
FYI: The word "further" is ambiguous in this context. Most American English speakers interpret it one way, and most British English speakers interpret it the other. As a result, there are endless flame wars on Slashdot about which interpretation is correct.
In this case, the argument is whether the original phrase "our available resources would stretch 10x further" by Baron_Yam means "10x" or "+10x" (i.e. "11x"). The grandparent AC is pointing out the correct wording for the alternate interpretation: "+9x" (i.e. "10x").
I'll let you decide which one you think is correct. Personally I think the only winning move is not to play == don't use the word further/farther, and just say "10x." That way everybody understands what you mean.
No, it's not ambiguous, and it doesn't matter which side of "the pond" you're from.
There's a multiplicative component and an additive component. The multiplicative component comes from the word "times", the additive component comes from the word "further".
10 is 1 times greater than 5. 10 = 1*(5) + 5
10 is 2 times 5. 10 = 2*5
10 is 100% more than 5. 10 = (100/100) * (5) + 5
10 is 200% of 5. 10 = (200/100) * 5
Note that if there's no value after "times", "percent", etc., the object being compared to is implied as the relative basis. X is Y times (Z) greater than Z.
The only reason this is an issue is because people like to bastardize math and statistics to lie.
"Our product is 120% faster!" really means "Our product is 20% faster.".
"Our product costs 2 times less!" really means "Our product costs half!" or "Their product costs one time more than ours.".
Idiot. Planned Parenthood is the problem not the solution. Look at the numbers. Birth control is 99% effective. Pretty good huh? That means that 1 out of 100 times you have intercourse it will result in pregnancy. So if you have sex a single time, once a week, you're good for two years before it fails and you get pregnant.
If you are a more normal individual and have sex multiple times several times a week... well there's a reason so many women on birth control have to get abortions.
You really want to prevent pregnancy? Then don't have sex.
Birth control is much closer to 99.9% effective when used properly.
And the published failure rates tend to be for use throughout a year. So if a particular brand of pill claims 99.8% effectiveness, then 0.2% percent of users in a given year can expect to get preggerz, assuming they use it properly.
Fewer jobs.
We all know how Rich Democrats feel about, "The Help".
Right... and Rich Republicans are so much more empathetic towards "The Help".
Conservatives and religious people donate more money (a higher percentage of their income/assets, not just in terms of raw dollars) to charities and non-profits than liberals and atheists.
I don't know whether or not they feel smug when doing so.
No medical "authority" claims that sex reassignment surgery changes a person's sex.
If you're not able to engage in sexual reproduction as a male/female, then you're not really male/female, are you?
And yes, classically, children and post-menopausal women were considered differently. Boys and girls were often dressed and treated the same. Post-menopausal women were crones. That's not an insult - a crone could range from being considered a wise, respected member of society, or a crazy old cat lady depending on the person.
But hey, if you want to let political retards hijack the actual meanings of words, go right ahead. I've even seen them get their hooks into bees. They're not drones anymore, they're "females" now, despite the fact that bees don't work that way at all. You need that sweet, sweet royal jelly to be a queen bee. I mean, who are they to assume a bee's sex anyway?!
You can use quotation marks all you want. He was elected. He is the current President of the United States of America.
You don't have to like it, but lets face i t- the "vocal minority" has been dictating the nation's policy and direction for decades.
Agree. Why should tech CEO's or celebrities be a better source of general political ideas than Joe Sixpack? Opinions are like assholes: everyone has one.
Because these particular assholes have agendas and PR images. Everything they do publicly is to bolster their PR image and further their agendas.
Their agendas include gaining wealth and gaining power, not helping the common man. In fact, screwing the common man is a common tactic.
CDs are compact discs.
Not to be confused with 8" and 5.25" floppy disks, 3.5" floppy diskettes, or hard disks.
You need another M for Musk.
Huh? A Farnsworth Fuser can produce neutrons and can be made in most physics labs.
That's GOOD NEWS for EVERYONE.
PhD in theoretical physics
So, not an actual science, then?
Everybody dies. Some people get dealt a shitty hand. If you can't run with the pack, too bad.
We can't drag the rest of society down for a handful of unfit (or stupid) people. Cold and heartless? Sure.
Can we force people who don't want to get vaccinated in order to indirectly protect the people who can't get vaccinated?
I say hell fucking no. If people has baseless fears about vaccines, a general distrust of the government and corporations pushing them, or just plain don't want to, that's their fucking right. If other people are so infirm that the existence of unvaccinated people poses a threat to them, too bad.
Disease and death are the natural state of things, and we will never win that war. The majority of society needs to progress forward without being anchored by either group, but also without violating their rights (forced vaccines or euthanasia).
For every disease we eradicate, a new one will fill the void anyway. Nature abhors a vacuum, after all.
As a Californian, I read the same thing. As someone who went through the California public school system decades ago, I can tell you that schools funded this shit. They had "medical providers" do the doing, but it was on the school's dime. And in the case of shit like scoliosis checks, the "medical providers" were the lunch ladies who received 4 minutes of training.
PresidentMadagascar.jpg
The psychological and psychiatric professional communities overwhelmingly disagree with this. There is a disorder related to transgenderism, but not all transgendered people have the disorder.
No they don't. Most don't even recognize transgenderism / transexualism as anything but a symptom of mental disorder.
Dial back the clock a few decades and look at homosexuals were considered. That's how the trans group is regarded today, by professionals.
One sperm is not enough, unless you're making a test tube baby.
In the normal method, you need plenty of sperm to reach the egg and smash down the gates before a single sperm can get inside.