Britain can trivially fork the EU regs and then carry on with rules they can tune better to how the British people want things. You're on a forum where this concept of 'forking' is common knowledge and yet you squee about vast unknown terribleness. So pitiful, it's difficult to believe you are being serious.
Kill Apple. Microsoft is already hobbled, plus the whole Microsoft leviathan was created by Apple's litigious adventures in the 80s - early 90s that ran gui competitors out of business. Killing all the lawyers would be an overreach. Killing all the Apple lawyers would be therapeutic.
Just look at AIPAC. They don't care about protecting the U.S. They care about protecting Israel. The U.S. is secondary in their overall aims.
Israel is far more vulnerable than the US. The organization is formed around the principles of defending Israel. You're accusing a brown rabbit of having brown fur.
You are't having a debate if you start out by calling them 'haters.' You're simply engaging in cult-belief reinforcement activities. To be fair, the people you are 'debating' with might also be in a cult.
I, for one, can clearly see that, everytime a Tesla car taken apart (for reverse engineering?), what found is innovation after innovation!
Design quirk after design quirk. What else would you expect when a bunch of SV Web developers set out to design a car? Some small fraction of whats thrown up at the wall won't slide off.
But all such study examines is the accidents. Obviously 'good driving' is difficult to define, but accidents are just artifacts. That is ALL that they are. Would you agree to assessing the quality of a software system by only examining any resultant core dumps?
You're kidding, right? Human pedestrians allowed on the special pathways that only AI directed cars are allowed on? That would mess up the whole scheme!
people are now going to build best in breed deployment workflows for specific applications and frameworks, and those become the de facto standard shared
"I want to make clear to the public that HealthCare.gov and the Marketplace Call Center are still available, and open enrollment will not be negatively impacted,"
Translation: "Please continue to put your personal information in our shitwagon."
The idea that people who have fallen out of the practice of even normal driving will be able to alert-up and be ready to maneuver through a driving emergency is so far gone that it's amazing it can exist as hype.
I am not an idiot. A portal that allows one-step comprehensive capture of everything gathered about them in a profile should simply not be available.
If all you have is the ID and password, in seconds you can have everything else. Certainly faster than some people will be able to change their ID/Password if they even realize it's compromised.
But go around calling people idiots. It really helps build your case in the discussion.
Is it because people right here in this discusison keep conflating UI/UX design with some sort of frilly artistic bullshit?
It's design of a user interface. Not it's artistic merit. Not what it looks like. That is widget design, which comes after UI/UX design.
The User Interface is the buttons, hierarchy of menu, graphical cues, etc. It can all be written as a guideline, which it actually for the most part has been designed and just needs consistent implementation. Everybody has their boutique obsessions, the CUA just needs a little updating.
It really isn't that hard. We need to emphasize the usability part of design, not the 'appearance' part. User interface and user experience have little to do with 'artistic' and much more to do with human factors. We do NOT need a free-software Jony Ives, for pete's sake.
Just some well designed guidelines that people can work from. Coherent, consistent, and intuitive. It's easy to toss those words out, much more challenging to actually accomplish, but it's the kind of thing that only needs to be done once or a few times.
Slashdot Mirror
Britain can trivially fork the EU regs and then carry on with rules they can tune better to how the British people want things. You're on a forum where this concept of 'forking' is common knowledge and yet you squee about vast unknown terribleness. So pitiful, it's difficult to believe you are being serious.
"The wrong side" won, and all the smartest people in the room will never get over it.
Plus, their globalist masters have immense wealth to support the hue and cry.
Kill Apple. Microsoft is already hobbled, plus the whole Microsoft leviathan was created by Apple's litigious adventures in the 80s - early 90s that ran gui competitors out of business. Killing all the lawyers would be an overreach. Killing all the Apple lawyers would be therapeutic.
There is a bit of American exceptionalism at play.
Just look at AIPAC. They don't care about protecting the U.S. They care about protecting Israel. The U.S. is secondary in their overall aims.
Israel is far more vulnerable than the US. The organization is formed around the principles of defending Israel. You're accusing a brown rabbit of having brown fur.
And when the EU is broken up everybody can learn to play nicely.
We'll have to see, though, if Germany is capable of that.
Blame the Democrats for nominating a turd and then scampering for two years to try to deflect the blame for Trump's electoral success.
Fuck off, you little pink. We're nerds here. Go troll on a sports blog or something like a nice little vanilla.
You are't having a debate if you start out by calling them 'haters.' You're simply engaging in cult-belief reinforcement activities. To be fair, the people you are 'debating' with might also be in a cult.
I, for one, can clearly see that, everytime a Tesla car taken apart (for reverse engineering?), what found is innovation after innovation!
Design quirk after design quirk. What else would you expect when a bunch of SV Web developers set out to design a car? Some small fraction of whats thrown up at the wall won't slide off.
But all such study examines is the accidents. Obviously 'good driving' is difficult to define, but accidents are just artifacts. That is ALL that they are. Would you agree to assessing the quality of a software system by only examining any resultant core dumps?
You're kidding, right? Human pedestrians allowed on the special pathways that only AI directed cars are allowed on? That would mess up the whole scheme!
You're apparently an expert in rhetorical argument, however.
So very clever. Shall we pick apart and quote snippets from your comments?
people are now going to build best in breed deployment workflows for specific applications and frameworks, and those become the de facto standard shared
yikes!
"I want to make clear to the public that HealthCare.gov and the Marketplace Call Center are still available, and open enrollment will not be negatively impacted,"
Translation: "Please continue to put your personal information in our shitwagon."
There isn't enough data yet.
All present findings are statistically insignificant. The reality has to scale out to the entire population before it means anything.
Yes. People for whom cars are an afterthought need to be included in the data, which at this point means many more people than current Tesla owners.
Apple produced the "wide brushed aluminum frame" version of the QuickTime Player for Windows long before Steve Jobs death.
Didn't that die when Apple was taken over by NeXT?
The idea that people who have fallen out of the practice of even normal driving will be able to alert-up and be ready to maneuver through a driving emergency is so far gone that it's amazing it can exist as hype.
Panasonic is building a gigafactory in China? I thought they already had a lot of production there.
It is if you're a third wave feminist or a 19th century Victorian.
Sounds like a core area of expertise for somebody like Putin who has climbed to the top of a huge heap of pigs.
I am not an idiot. A portal that allows one-step comprehensive capture of everything gathered about them in a profile should simply not be available.
If all you have is the ID and password, in seconds you can have everything else. Certainly faster than some people will be able to change their ID/Password if they even realize it's compromised.
But go around calling people idiots. It really helps build your case in the discussion.
Is it because people right here in this discusison keep conflating UI/UX design with some sort of frilly artistic bullshit?
It's design of a user interface. Not it's artistic merit. Not what it looks like. That is widget design, which comes after UI/UX design.
The User Interface is the buttons, hierarchy of menu, graphical cues, etc. It can all be written as a guideline, which it actually for the most part has been designed and just needs consistent implementation. Everybody has their boutique obsessions, the CUA just needs a little updating.
It really isn't that hard. We need to emphasize the usability part of design, not the 'appearance' part. User interface and user experience have little to do with 'artistic' and much more to do with human factors. We do NOT need a free-software Jony Ives, for pete's sake.
Just some well designed guidelines that people can work from. Coherent, consistent, and intuitive. It's easy to toss those words out, much more challenging to actually accomplish, but it's the kind of thing that only needs to be done once or a few times.