Slashdot Mirror


User: LMacG

LMacG's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
469
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 469

  1. About the available film on 1970s Polaroid SX-70 Cameras Make a Comeback · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The films from The Impossible Project work, but at this point still need to be considered "experimental". The biggest problem they have yet to conquer is the chemical layer that shields the photo from light immediately after ejection from the camera - aka the opacifier layer.

    All the current films require that you immediately protect the film from ambient light while it develops, which definitely kills some of the joy of the original SX70 experience.

    Still major amounts of mad props to TIP for saving the film manufacturing equipment from being scrapped and being able to create a whole new film that works even as well as it does, on a shoestring budget in a short amount of time.

  2. Re:Why aren't these still available? on 1970s Polaroid SX-70 Cameras Make a Comeback · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fuji still makes some instant cameras, the Instax and Instax Mini line. The blood-sucking leeches, errrrr, the company that currently owns the Polaroid name rebadges one of the Instax Minis as the Polaroid 300 and sells it at a premium.

    The Instax films are not compatible with older Polaroid cameras that use integral films, but Fuji also makes some films that fit the even older Polaroid pack film type cameras (pull the film out, wait 60 seconds, peel, wonder what to do with goopy negative portion).

  3. Re:read? on Kevin Kelly Answers Your Questions · · Score: 1

    While you are reading, you should look up "false dichotomy."

  4. Re:Roundabouts on SignalGuru Helps Drivers Avoid Red Lights · · Score: 1

    Look kids, Big Ben! Parliament!

  5. Bad summary is bad. on Digital Tech and the Re-Birth of Product Placement · · Score: 1

    >When you think of product placement on television you tend to think of cumbersome 1950s examples where the actor would cheesily turn to camera and hold up, say, a bar of soap

    No I don't. I think of a scene with the actors driving somewhere, and one says to the other "hey, this is that new CANYONERO with that great NAVISYNCSTAR system, isn't it?" And the dialog just gets worse from there, while the camera lingers lovingly on the vehicles console for a creepily long time.

  6. Could be worse . . . on Review: Rise of the Planet of the Apes · · Score: 2

    > was it going to be a Sci-Fi film, or an action film?

    As long as it's not a Syfy film!

  7. Facebook's "policy" on Facebook Exec: Online Anonymity Must Go Away · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's cute that she thinks everybody on FB uses a real name. I'll be sure to pass that along to my friend Charlie Unknown*, and many others.

    *Not the actual pseudonym, I wouldn't want somebody to get reported to the bureaucrats....

  8. Re:DUPE... again on Microsoft Suggests Heating Homes With "Data Furnaces" · · Score: 2

    It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.

  9. Re:May I correct your English? on Utah To Teach USA is a Republic, Not a Democracy · · Score: 1

    The choice of "a" or "an" is dictated by the sound of the following syllable, not based on the letter. Since "utopia" starts with the sound equivalent to "you", then "a" is the proper choice. Similarly, we would say an honor.

    (Insert argument about "an historic ..." here).

  10. Re:The Best of Philip K Dick on Blade Runner Sequels and Prequels Happening · · Score: 1

    "Roog" is one of the best stories, ever. I'm also fond of "The Short Happy Life of the Brown Oxford".

    And last night I read "The Eyes Have It", which I don't think I'd encountered before.

  11. Re:A better policy.... on Employer Facebook Password Requests Suspended · · Score: 1

    Wow, flamebait mod for a Stewie quote. Mod isn't a Family Guy fan, I guess.

  12. Re:Underwhelming achievement on Watson Wins Jeopardy Contest · · Score: 1

    Eddie Timanus wasn't amateurish.

  13. Re:As ken said: on Watson Wins Jeopardy Contest · · Score: 1

    Really? You think only Slashdot readers have ever watched the Simpsons?

    You might want to check out that big room with the blue ceiling.

  14. Re:Old news on Scientists Work To Grow Meat In a Lab · · Score: 1

    Yep, I was disappointed that there was absolutely no mention of Phil and Lem in this story.

  15. Re:Yay! on The Case of Apple's Mystery Screw · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think in this case they moved the extraneous vowel to the end, they're called ScrewU's

  16. Re:Yay! on The Case of Apple's Mystery Screw · · Score: 1

    *sings*
    Cellular, Modular, screws are Pentalobular.

    Bonus points to who gets the reference

    *sings*
    Make a circuit with me /*sings*
    I can't wait to spend my bonus points!!

  17. Re:Not a new problem on Auto Incorrect · · Score: 1

    Back in the early 90's I worked with Unisys desktop systems (oh BTOS, how I miss thee). The suggested correction for "Unisys" was "anuses." We filed a problem report, and the official response was "works as designed."

  18. Re:Generally speaking, all Mario Jump & Runs.. on Super Mario Bros. 3 Level Design Lessons · · Score: 1

    How what? How to display a left angle aka less than?

    HTML entities are your friends...

    &lt; becomes <

    Gotta have the starting ampersand and trailing semicolon.

  19. Re:HERE IS WHAT YOU NEED, KIDS !! on Mathematics As the Most Misunderstood Subject · · Score: 1

    Now go back to the original and look at the first line.

  20. Re:So? on Woman Sues Google Over Street View Shots of Her Underwear · · Score: 1

    +1

    (and unfortunately required additional text to get around the lameness filter)

  21. Re:Could someone kindly explain on Judge Declares Federal Healthcare Plan (Partly) Unconstitutional · · Score: 4, Informative

    At a very rudimentary level . . . A bill can be introduced in either the Senate or the House of Representatives. After being passed in one, it must then be passed by the other before it is sent to the President, who can sign the bill into law or veto it. If one chamber has added amendments that the other didn't, or if the two chambers have passed bills that are similar but not exactly the same, then the differences must be worked out by a conference committee and the compromise bill re-passed before it can be signed.

    Any law can be challenged as being unconstitutional - you just need somebody with standing to file the appropriate suit in the appropriate court.

    The judge is not "messing with the law", he is making a judgment on whether or not it violates the Constitution.

  22. Re:Floppy disk in the wash on Stunts, Idiocy, and Hero Hacks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think you understand the term "got lucky." Oh right, I'm reading Slashdot ...

  23. Re:Nirvana Quest on Google Go Capturing Developer Interest · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and I'm champing at the bit to correct another mangled idiom. And don't even get me started on forming plurals.

  24. Re:Just because you can... on I Use Twitter, Please Rob Me · · Score: 1

    Ah, thank you for that information. People aren't just being asshats inadvertantly, they doing it on purpose. Time to edit some lists, I think.

  25. Re:Just because you can... on I Use Twitter, Please Rob Me · · Score: 1

    And just because you can allow foursquare to barrage your friends with location updates (which is probably the default, based on what I've seen) doesn't mean you should. The issue isn't people sharing their information, it's people screaming "look at me, look at me".