The obvious solution is to dig only under your own property. Any two pieces of property can be connected by digging straight down from both of them until the tunnels intersect.
They conveniently intersect at his secret underground volcanic lair...
And even more important is the time you saved, you can watch a 45 minute show in only 23 minutes. I.e. without the fuckin' ads.
That's why I use DVR for practically everything I watch now, to skip the ads.
It used to be that there were 4 ads shown every 15 minutes. Now they are up to 6 ads, for some shows, and they have started showing mini-content (4 to 5 minutes) between two sets of ads. It's definitely at the point where a TV show is unwatchable in real time.
Seriously, stop accepting Microsoft excuses and accepting their constant excuses. Windows 10 FAILED. It's Windows Vista again, but this time they're doubling down instead of cutting their loses on the worse of it and fixing it in the next edition they're just doubling down.
You do know that they did the same with Vista? Right? Windows 7 is just a re-branded version of Windows Vista. In other words, Microsoft did double-down on Vista.
Vista flopped because the PC manufacturers didn't believe Microsoft on the release date so they dragged their asses in the development of Windows drivers for the new driver model. Then when Vista was released, manufacturers were caught with their pants down. People upgrading to Vista ended up with blue-screens or just couldn't get their hardware to work. Of course, everyone blamed Microsoft.
By the time Windows 7 was released, most people had upgraded to new hardware and manufacturers had Vista/Win7 drivers available. So it was a much easier transition.
Ok but admit that, given a choice, when your kid goes into anaphylaxis, you're not going to reach for the generic.
Given time constraints, I somehow don't think that Dad or Mom are going to run to CVS and browse for an Epipen. "Which one should we get Dear?" The only useful one is the one you have with you or the one in the ambulance.
Since there is no difference in what is in the pen and they have the same effect, there is no reason to buy the more expensive one. Either way, it's a temporary measure until you can get the person to the hospital.
Despite them not succeeding, you have to give them credit for at least refunding folks compared to other epic failures on Kickstarter. In the last year, we've also seen the number of consumer drones skyrocket leading to more "accidents" so maybe the market is starting to saturate.
This is why, in my opinion, Kickstarter, et al., should be investment based (i.e. shares). At least then you could write off losses due to failure on your tax return. What they could do is issue you shares and then provide an option to turn in those shares for the product when it ships or keep them in case the company succeeds. Of course, doing it this way would incur all kinds of legal costs, force them to make the books public, and complicate things. Which is probably why they don't do it.
Uh...you broke Law 365, section A, code D! Now we get a million dollars! Muahahahah
Laugh all you want, but there is a bit of validity to the complaint.
If you compare Amazon.com (US) to Amazon.ca (Canada) you will see that Amazon.com is like a superstore, with tons of choices and multiple price points for new, used, refurb, etc., and Amazon.ca is like your corner convenience store, you're lucky if you have one choice and it may or may not be marked up higher than retail. Yes, consumers should comparison shop but it could be confusing for less experience online shoppers.
Or, take a picture of something from 3meters away and see what you get when you load that image onto a computer and zoom in to it.
Obviously you have to enhance after zooming. If you continue enhancing, you can zoom in to any image indefinitely.
Incorrect... "enhancing" isn't anything like what you see in the movies. You can't enhance infinitely. You can enhance up to a point, but after that, there just isn't enough data and you start adding artifacts and inaccuracies. You might be able to get away with some inaccuracies depending on the fingerprint reader and the matching algorithm. That's why the researchers specified a limit in distance. They also don't go into the size of the photos, but the point is that now there is enough resolution provided by digital cameras (20MP+) and phones (10MP+) today to provide the necessary level of detail at 3 meters.
Unless someone starts producing ads like that, this Apple crap will have no chance of stopping.
PC is a Microsoft Surface with the same problems.
Nope... Microsoft Surface Pro 4 has standard ports and jacks, including a headphone jack. Maybe not enough USB ports, but it's a tablet.
Surface Pro 4 has a USB port, mini-displayport, headphone jack, Bluetooth, and Secure Digital card slot. The only thing proprietary are the charging and docking ports. You can use the USB port for a USB dock, if you need to. So that just leaves the charging cable that is proprietary.
Actually the EU already is after their blood money from VW
Well, the OP was complaining that whenever the EU goes after a US company, there are scores of complaints about how the EU is punishing American business for being American. This way round, there are always far fewer complaints for some reason, i.e. none.
It's indicitave of a double standard, not some fault on the part of the EU or the US.
No... It would be a double standard if the US went after an EU company for no good reason and no one complained.
In this case VW actually did something wrong. Or did you forget that they deliberately programmed their cars to cheat their way past emissions tests and breaking numerous laws while doing so?
There is probably a tiny bit more to it than that; nothing new in running against an application server, of course, but I suppose the real story might be that networking on mobiles is now considered mature and cheap enough for this architecture to be viable. And, I don't think you can equate www with "application servers".
My thought is that this is closer to how Citrix works. WeChat is basically the Citrix client...
When you said "nerd watch", thought you meant something like a "nerd alert"...
Don't wear a watch, haven't for 20 years. The Casios were cool, though.
I stopped wearing watches a long time ago, but recently started wearing them again. My thought is that you should have thee watches...
A dress watch (analog dial), for weddings, funerals, etc, a waterproof watch (dive style) for skiing, swimming, jetskiing, etc., and a nice casual watch for a night out on the town, work, etc. Because most people don't wear watches these days, people will come up and ask you what time it is and to comment on your watch (if it's a nice watch, not a cheapie plastic one) and it's a good conversation starter.
I'll probably pick up a Garmin watch for hiking because of the GPS and trail tracking capabilities. But that's as intelligent as my watches get. Smart watches don't appeal to me due to their clunky design and the lack of battery life. In addition, I prefer analog dials to digital, but that's just me...
if you buy an apple gadget it will be supported with apple software for at least 4 years. With 3rd party softwares even longer. My 5 year old desktop (ok now it's 6, also it's an ubuntu AFS server for my apple stuffs) can't install win10. Long gone are the times when you could install m$ software on old hw... Plus if as an IT tech guy you can't buy new gadgets every 4 years then change jobs. Pass down old stuffs to kids. Or to some elderly neighbors.
Windows 10 will install perfectly fine on almost any 5/6 year old desktop. My Dad has two generations of my old desktops and they are 7 and 10 years old and they run Windows 10 just fine. Granted, both were upgrades from Windows 7, but it proves that Windows 10 will run on older hardware just fine.
For some drivers, you may have to install the Windows NT/2K versions (i.e. turn off driver Signature Verification) and you may have to go through the process of loading them as part of the installation as it may not have them on the installation CD. But it works. You just need to do a bit of research and download the necessary drivers for the installation.
Apple has suffered from a lack of progress ever since Jobs died. They are treading water... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster. 'Predicting' that they will succeed and Microsoft will falter is dubious.
On the other hand they got a friend of mine who hasn't worn a watch since 1998 to buy an Apple Watch. Actually two, first he bought one for his significant other and then he got jealous and bought one for himself. I know anecdotes aren't data, but Apple doesn't have to defend every market they're in as long as they grow new ones. I could see Apple launching a 2-in-1 convertible like the Surface Pro and decide between that and iCloud they don't care much about having any other kind of Mac. It would be enough for a vast majority of the PC users and the rest would simply be a market Apple won't serve.
I'm willing to bet that your friend is an outlier, one of the few who can afford to spend $370 for a watch, not just once but twice. Yes, there is a market for the Apple watch, but it currently isn't anywhere near big enough to push apple device sales to the levels being discussed.
As for Apple creating a convertible laptop, why? All they really need to do is create an iPad that runs OSX, but then they would eat into the Mac market. In fact, Time Cook has already said that they wouldn't do this... http://www.macrumors.com/2015/...
As a former border patrol officer said in an interview a few weeks ago 1 in 10 illegals he took into custody had a voter ID card on him/her. Considering the low percentage of voters who carry their ID cards with them it would seem a huge percentage of illegals vote.
Unless the border guard can point to recorded statistics, it's purely an opinion. In general, most people suck at keeping accurate track of numbers and statistics in their head so they will say something that "sounds right", based on memory, but are usually way off base.
He may have believed what he was saying, but that doesn't make it true...
They never were a computer company (atleast not since their "rebirth"). They're a fashion company and they failed to make enough changes to remain fashionable.
Do you really believe that, or are you just regurgitating hater credo? Woz and Jobs fucking CREATED the individual computer movement. Microsoft created Word for Mac, not for DOS. Jesus, learn your history.
Really? So the Commodore Pet (1977) doesn't count as a personal computer? Also, there was this thing called Wordperfect (1980) that came before Word (1983)... The only reason why Microsoft developed for the Mac first is that they saw a market where WordPerfect didn't have a foothold (i.e. ease of entry).
If you think that Woz and Jobs created the personal computer then you are seriously misinformed. There were a large number of other computer designs being developed and the Apple was no where near the most popular or most advanced.
I think that you need to read a few more history books yourself.
That's why we need these companies to get to the point where they can diversify their product lines. So they can make normal cars with sane performance, while also having a dedicated sportscar line for bragging rights. It may not happen until Tesla's next-gen roadster, or projects like the Rimac Concept One turn into mass-production vehicles, but it'll hopefully happen someday.
The surest way to fail is for a new, unknown car company to build economy cars. Who is going to pay $25K or more to an unknown car company with an unknown track record?
However, people are willing to pay a lot of money for custom cars, especially fast ones, even if it ends up being a collectors item. It's a way to recoup R&D costs while growing the business.
8K buys you nothing when human visual perception is limited to 4K! "Duh, bigger numbers better!" appears to be the new marketing mantra.
But... From what I can find, some estimates are that the human eye can see up to 15 Million pixels. 4K is only about 8.3 million pixels. So, there is some benefit of going to 8K, about 48 million pixels, as it finally exceeds what the eye can theoretically handle. If you cut that in half to provide for 3D, then you have two 24 million pixel pictures that the eye cannot distinguish between computer generated and reality.
For movies, not much. There's definitely a wow factor in some of them but you quickly forget about it and just enjoy the movie.
But for coding and web browsing, I found 4K to be a surprising win.
The extra clarity in text is absolutely wonderful. With low-res screens I often find myself wanting to zoom in on text despite being able to read the small text without straining my eyes. When I got my first 4K screen I noticed I was no longer tempted to do any zooming.
I disagree. For movies there is a good bit of difference, especially for 4K content with HDR. Is it a huge difference, nope. Is it enough of a difference to make it more enjoyable and more lifelike, yep! Is it worth upgrading just for the new format? Not yet. Not unless you have to (i.e. broken TV). I was planning on waiting another couple of years to go to 4K, but my Plasma died and it was under warranty.
Do you notice the difference? Yes, definitely. For content that is filmed in 4K and uses HDR. The big caveat is that most 4K HDR movies only have some original 4K content, the rest is up-scaled, perhaps with better color gamut and less compression. They were not originally filmed in 4K. As more 4K content comes out, the differences will be easier to see. X-Men: Apocalypse, for example, was filmed in 4K and it shows.
Of course, all of this assumes that you have your TV at the proper viewing distance for the size. If you have a 40" TV and are 8 feet away, a 720p picture will look fine. If you have a 65" and are 8 feet away, you'll notice the difference between 720p, 1080p, and 4K.
I'm waiting for the employee that knows how to do the job and can do it well and on time without management. I hear this is possible, but I suspect only as an academic premise.
At one job I went two years without a manager and the work still got prioritized, including adjustments based on business needs, and completed on time. Part of the feedback from my various managers is that I got a lot done, get it done on time, and keep everyone happy, but that I don't meet with the manager regularly enough to discuss what I am doing. And they think that they need to somehow "fix it".
My thought is that you have met such an employee. But that you think that you knew better and had to tell them what to do. More than likely they ignored you and went about getting the job done.
Ok, I can see where this is coming from, but if propaganda is out now, pretty much every news outlet along with every blogger would have to get banned. What's left is cat videos.
Then again... I doubt it would lower quality noticeably...
And you don't think that cat videos fall into the same CATegory? Cat videos are all about propaganda. It paints cats in a PURRfect light. But the TAIL is so much more duplicitous, they are pure evil and up to no good... At least, that's what my sister's dog tells me... Them and squirrels...
Slashdot Mirror
Wow, a single trivial feature that is already implemented in countless utilities being added to an OS deserves a whole story? Must be a slow news day.
And here I thought that Bias lighting was the better way to go....
http://www.howtogeek.com/21346...
The obvious solution is to dig only under your own property. Any two pieces of property can be connected by digging straight down from both of them until the tunnels intersect.
They conveniently intersect at his secret underground volcanic lair...
No, Magma lair...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
The last three JJ Abrams Star Trek movies (I think one of them may have been mis-labeled as a Star Wars movie) were beyond awful.
Personally, I rather enjoyed the reboot movies... Much better than any of the Enterprise episodes...
And even more important is the time you saved, you can watch a 45 minute show in only 23 minutes. I.e. without the fuckin' ads.
That's why I use DVR for practically everything I watch now, to skip the ads.
It used to be that there were 4 ads shown every 15 minutes. Now they are up to 6 ads, for some shows, and they have started showing mini-content (4 to 5 minutes) between two sets of ads. It's definitely at the point where a TV show is unwatchable in real time.
Seriously, stop accepting Microsoft excuses and accepting their constant excuses. Windows 10 FAILED. It's Windows Vista again, but this time they're doubling down instead of cutting their loses on the worse of it and fixing it in the next edition they're just doubling down.
You do know that they did the same with Vista? Right? Windows 7 is just a re-branded version of Windows Vista. In other words, Microsoft did double-down on Vista.
Vista flopped because the PC manufacturers didn't believe Microsoft on the release date so they dragged their asses in the development of Windows drivers for the new driver model. Then when Vista was released, manufacturers were caught with their pants down. People upgrading to Vista ended up with blue-screens or just couldn't get their hardware to work. Of course, everyone blamed Microsoft.
By the time Windows 7 was released, most people had upgraded to new hardware and manufacturers had Vista/Win7 drivers available. So it was a much easier transition.
Ok but admit that, given a choice, when your kid goes into anaphylaxis, you're not going to reach for the generic.
Given time constraints, I somehow don't think that Dad or Mom are going to run to CVS and browse for an Epipen. "Which one should we get Dear?" The only useful one is the one you have with you or the one in the ambulance.
Since there is no difference in what is in the pen and they have the same effect, there is no reason to buy the more expensive one. Either way, it's a temporary measure until you can get the person to the hospital.
Despite them not succeeding, you have to give them credit for at least refunding folks compared to other epic failures on Kickstarter. In the last year, we've also seen the number of consumer drones skyrocket leading to more "accidents" so maybe the market is starting to saturate.
This is why, in my opinion, Kickstarter, et al., should be investment based (i.e. shares). At least then you could write off losses due to failure on your tax return. What they could do is issue you shares and then provide an option to turn in those shares for the product when it ships or keep them in case the company succeeds. Of course, doing it this way would incur all kinds of legal costs, force them to make the books public, and complicate things. Which is probably why they don't do it.
Uh...you broke Law 365, section A, code D! Now we get a million dollars! Muahahahah
Laugh all you want, but there is a bit of validity to the complaint.
If you compare Amazon.com (US) to Amazon.ca (Canada) you will see that Amazon.com is like a superstore, with tons of choices and multiple price points for new, used, refurb, etc., and Amazon.ca is like your corner convenience store, you're lucky if you have one choice and it may or may not be marked up higher than retail. Yes, consumers should comparison shop but it could be confusing for less experience online shoppers.
Or, take a picture of something from 3meters away and see what you get when you load that image onto a computer and zoom in to it.
Obviously you have to enhance after zooming. If you continue enhancing, you can zoom in to any image indefinitely.
Incorrect... "enhancing" isn't anything like what you see in the movies. You can't enhance infinitely. You can enhance up to a point, but after that, there just isn't enough data and you start adding artifacts and inaccuracies. You might be able to get away with some inaccuracies depending on the fingerprint reader and the matching algorithm. That's why the researchers specified a limit in distance. They also don't go into the size of the photos, but the point is that now there is enough resolution provided by digital cameras (20MP+) and phones (10MP+) today to provide the necessary level of detail at 3 meters.
Unless someone starts producing ads like that, this Apple crap will have no chance of stopping.
PC is a Microsoft Surface with the same problems.
Nope... Microsoft Surface Pro 4 has standard ports and jacks, including a headphone jack. Maybe not enough USB ports, but it's a tablet.
Surface Pro 4 has a USB port, mini-displayport, headphone jack, Bluetooth, and Secure Digital card slot. The only thing proprietary are the charging and docking ports. You can use the USB port for a USB dock, if you need to. So that just leaves the charging cable that is proprietary.
Colour me fucking stunned.
You got a Pantone chip for that?
Just curious.
Yes, "fucking stunned" is #0089af... The look was created by Derek Zoolander as a follow-up to Magnum... (grin)
Actually the EU already is after their blood money from VW
Well, the OP was complaining that whenever the EU goes after a US company, there are scores of complaints about how the EU is punishing American business for being American. This way round, there are always far fewer complaints for some reason, i.e. none.
It's indicitave of a double standard, not some fault on the part of the EU or the US.
No... It would be a double standard if the US went after an EU company for no good reason and no one complained.
In this case VW actually did something wrong. Or did you forget that they deliberately programmed their cars to cheat their way past emissions tests and breaking numerous laws while doing so?
Congratulations - you invented the World Wide Web
There is probably a tiny bit more to it than that; nothing new in running against an application server, of course, but I suppose the real story might be that networking on mobiles is now considered mature and cheap enough for this architecture to be viable. And, I don't think you can equate www with "application servers".
My thought is that this is closer to how Citrix works. WeChat is basically the Citrix client...
Except that the entire thing is unibody and if a cable goes bad between "servers", it's cheaper to replace the entire rack.
And next year's rack will be so awesome that it will only support official Apple PDU accessories and require new magnetic power cords...
When you said "nerd watch", thought you meant something like a "nerd alert"...
Don't wear a watch, haven't for 20 years. The Casios were cool, though.
I stopped wearing watches a long time ago, but recently started wearing them again. My thought is that you should have thee watches...
A dress watch (analog dial), for weddings, funerals, etc, a waterproof watch (dive style) for skiing, swimming, jetskiing, etc., and a nice casual watch for a night out on the town, work, etc. Because most people don't wear watches these days, people will come up and ask you what time it is and to comment on your watch (if it's a nice watch, not a cheapie plastic one) and it's a good conversation starter.
I'll probably pick up a Garmin watch for hiking because of the GPS and trail tracking capabilities. But that's as intelligent as my watches get. Smart watches don't appeal to me due to their clunky design and the lack of battery life. In addition, I prefer analog dials to digital, but that's just me...
if you buy an apple gadget it will be supported with apple software for at least 4 years. With 3rd party softwares even longer. My 5 year old desktop (ok now it's 6, also it's an ubuntu AFS server for my apple stuffs) can't install win10. Long gone are the times when you could install m$ software on old hw...
Plus if as an IT tech guy you can't buy new gadgets every 4 years then change jobs. Pass down old stuffs to kids. Or to some elderly neighbors.
Windows 10 will install perfectly fine on almost any 5/6 year old desktop. My Dad has two generations of my old desktops and they are 7 and 10 years old and they run Windows 10 just fine. Granted, both were upgrades from Windows 7, but it proves that Windows 10 will run on older hardware just fine.
For some drivers, you may have to install the Windows NT/2K versions (i.e. turn off driver Signature Verification) and you may have to go through the process of loading them as part of the installation as it may not have them on the installation CD. But it works. You just need to do a bit of research and download the necessary drivers for the installation.
Apple has suffered from a lack of progress ever since Jobs died. They are treading water... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster. 'Predicting' that they will succeed and Microsoft will falter is dubious.
On the other hand they got a friend of mine who hasn't worn a watch since 1998 to buy an Apple Watch. Actually two, first he bought one for his significant other and then he got jealous and bought one for himself. I know anecdotes aren't data, but Apple doesn't have to defend every market they're in as long as they grow new ones. I could see Apple launching a 2-in-1 convertible like the Surface Pro and decide between that and iCloud they don't care much about having any other kind of Mac. It would be enough for a vast majority of the PC users and the rest would simply be a market Apple won't serve.
I'm willing to bet that your friend is an outlier, one of the few who can afford to spend $370 for a watch, not just once but twice. Yes, there is a market for the Apple watch, but it currently isn't anywhere near big enough to push apple device sales to the levels being discussed.
As for Apple creating a convertible laptop, why? All they really need to do is create an iPad that runs OSX, but then they would eat into the Mac market. In fact, Time Cook has already said that they wouldn't do this... http://www.macrumors.com/2015/...
As a former border patrol officer said in an interview a few weeks ago 1 in 10 illegals he took into custody had a voter ID card on him/her. Considering the low percentage of voters who carry their ID cards with them it would seem a huge percentage of illegals vote.
Unless the border guard can point to recorded statistics, it's purely an opinion. In general, most people suck at keeping accurate track of numbers and statistics in their head so they will say something that "sounds right", based on memory, but are usually way off base.
He may have believed what he was saying, but that doesn't make it true...
They never were a computer company (atleast not since their "rebirth").
They're a fashion company and they failed to make enough changes to remain fashionable.
Do you really believe that, or are you just regurgitating hater credo? Woz and Jobs fucking CREATED the individual computer movement. Microsoft created Word for Mac, not for DOS. Jesus, learn your history.
Really? So the Commodore Pet (1977) doesn't count as a personal computer? Also, there was this thing called Wordperfect (1980) that came before Word (1983)... The only reason why Microsoft developed for the Mac first is that they saw a market where WordPerfect didn't have a foothold (i.e. ease of entry).
If you think that Woz and Jobs created the personal computer then you are seriously misinformed. There were a large number of other computer designs being developed and the Apple was no where near the most popular or most advanced.
I think that you need to read a few more history books yourself.
That's why we need these companies to get to the point where they can diversify their product lines. So they can make normal cars with sane performance, while also having a dedicated sportscar line for bragging rights. It may not happen until Tesla's next-gen roadster, or projects like the Rimac Concept One turn into mass-production vehicles, but it'll hopefully happen someday.
The surest way to fail is for a new, unknown car company to build economy cars. Who is going to pay $25K or more to an unknown car company with an unknown track record?
However, people are willing to pay a lot of money for custom cars, especially fast ones, even if it ends up being a collectors item. It's a way to recoup R&D costs while growing the business.
8K buys you nothing when human visual perception is limited to 4K! "Duh, bigger numbers better!" appears to be the new marketing mantra.
But... From what I can find, some estimates are that the human eye can see up to 15 Million pixels. 4K is only about 8.3 million pixels. So, there is some benefit of going to 8K, about 48 million pixels, as it finally exceeds what the eye can theoretically handle. If you cut that in half to provide for 3D, then you have two 24 million pixel pictures that the eye cannot distinguish between computer generated and reality.
For movies, not much. There's definitely a wow factor in some of them but you quickly forget about it and just enjoy the movie.
But for coding and web browsing, I found 4K to be a surprising win.
The extra clarity in text is absolutely wonderful. With low-res screens I often find myself wanting to zoom in on text despite being able to read the small text without straining my eyes. When I got my first 4K screen I noticed I was no longer tempted to do any zooming.
I disagree. For movies there is a good bit of difference, especially for 4K content with HDR. Is it a huge difference, nope. Is it enough of a difference to make it more enjoyable and more lifelike, yep! Is it worth upgrading just for the new format? Not yet. Not unless you have to (i.e. broken TV). I was planning on waiting another couple of years to go to 4K, but my Plasma died and it was under warranty.
Do you notice the difference? Yes, definitely. For content that is filmed in 4K and uses HDR. The big caveat is that most 4K HDR movies only have some original 4K content, the rest is up-scaled, perhaps with better color gamut and less compression. They were not originally filmed in 4K. As more 4K content comes out, the differences will be easier to see. X-Men: Apocalypse, for example, was filmed in 4K and it shows.
Of course, all of this assumes that you have your TV at the proper viewing distance for the size. If you have a 40" TV and are 8 feet away, a 720p picture will look fine. If you have a 65" and are 8 feet away, you'll notice the difference between 720p, 1080p, and 4K.
https://www.avforums.com/artic...
I'm waiting for the employee that knows how to do the job and can do it well and on time without management. I hear this is possible, but I suspect only as an academic premise.
At one job I went two years without a manager and the work still got prioritized, including adjustments based on business needs, and completed on time. Part of the feedback from my various managers is that I got a lot done, get it done on time, and keep everyone happy, but that I don't meet with the manager regularly enough to discuss what I am doing. And they think that they need to somehow "fix it".
My thought is that you have met such an employee. But that you think that you knew better and had to tell them what to do. More than likely they ignored you and went about getting the job done.
Ok, I can see where this is coming from, but if propaganda is out now, pretty much every news outlet along with every blogger would have to get banned. What's left is cat videos.
Then again... I doubt it would lower quality noticeably...
And you don't think that cat videos fall into the same CATegory? Cat videos are all about propaganda. It paints cats in a PURRfect light. But the TAIL is so much more duplicitous, they are pure evil and up to no good... At least, that's what my sister's dog tells me... Them and squirrels...
Valued at $0.0003 per Yahoo user?
They're over-optimistic.
There is probably more value in buying a delinquent credit sheet that has been through 3 other collection agencies....