I was specifically referring to human evolution, and that no definitive proof has been produced that we have evolved from apes. I agree that evolution is an extremely good explanation and I firmly believe that it is fact, we just dont have the supporting evidence yet:)
Considering they just got a donation of $1 billion from a private donor, according to a/. Firehose entry (it must be said that this entry does not have any supporting evidence and follow-up searches return no evidence) http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=463124
And now we see the continued dumbing down of the school system. What will they be teaching in place of evolution? ID? Is there empirical evidence behind ID that i'm not aware of? I dont see how they can justify this. If they're not teaching evolution they shouldn't be allowed to teach anything on the origin of species, because neither popular argument (ID/evolution) is proven (although evolution makes FAR more sense, dont you think?)
As much as I hate microsoft I don't actually see a problem here. ALl they're doing is encouraging market competition. (also, on the Reply page I'm writing on, there is a blu-ray ad. I find that funny)
I don't see "Don't release an unfinished crappy OS" anywhere in there. Not sure why I'd expect that from a respectable software giant, but hey, a guy can dream right?
Why hasn't Tom Cruise responded a-la Chris Crocker with a video called "Leave Xenu ALONE!"
I was specifically referring to human evolution, and that no definitive proof has been produced that we have evolved from apes. I agree that evolution is an extremely good explanation and I firmly believe that it is fact, we just dont have the supporting evidence yet :)
Considering they just got a donation of $1 billion from a private donor, according to a /. Firehose entry (it must be said that this entry does not have any supporting evidence and follow-up searches return no evidence) http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=463124
And now we see the continued dumbing down of the school system. What will they be teaching in place of evolution? ID? Is there empirical evidence behind ID that i'm not aware of? I dont see how they can justify this. If they're not teaching evolution they shouldn't be allowed to teach anything on the origin of species, because neither popular argument (ID/evolution) is proven (although evolution makes FAR more sense, dont you think?)
M$ lies again. Is anyone surprised anymore?
As much as I hate microsoft I don't actually see a problem here. ALl they're doing is encouraging market competition. (also, on the Reply page I'm writing on, there is a blu-ray ad. I find that funny)
Hm, working in their Q&A department might be a nice cushy job! *rummages around his desk* WHERE'S MY RESUME?!
I can see it now: "Please step this way to the rollercoaWHERE IS SARAH CONNOR?!"
I don't see "Don't release an unfinished crappy OS" anywhere in there. Not sure why I'd expect that from a respectable software giant, but hey, a guy can dream right?