Slashdot Mirror


User: DocHoncho

DocHoncho's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
608
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 608

  1. Re:Slashdot as a sucky games site on An Early Look At Halo: Reach · · Score: 1

    Maybe I misread your comment but the new game is to be called Halo: REACH and so you shall keep waiting for that non-Halo game from Bungie.
    Sorry Charlie.

  2. Re:Google... on Google Gets US Approval To Buy and Sell Energy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fun fact: The "..." is called an ellipsis.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsis
    Happy friday!

  3. Re:Sure they can claim it on IOC Claims Olympian Lindsey Vonn's Name As Intellectual Property · · Score: 1

    Lindsay Vonn sure thinks so! And she's a Gold Medal winning Olympian. This post not approved by the ICC or their laywers or gangs of thugs who travel the world breaking the kneecaps of anyone who dares to use their name in vain.

    I've always said, "Fuck the Olympics!" It's an overgrown circus sideshow posing as some kind of symbol of international solidarity. The ICC and their hangers on are more like the creatures from Alien who travel from country to country to devour the economy and move on.

    A bunch of wankers.

    Phew. There, I said it.

  4. Re:she? on Python Essential Reference 4th Ed. · · Score: 1

    "He" is the less sexist one, and anyone who disagrees, I'll puch(sic) him in the face.

    There, FTFY

  5. Re:If it's not broken, why are you fixing it? on Russia Plans To Divert Asteroid · · Score: 1

    Sadly I don't think he is joking at all. He's been posting this brain-sick nonsense for at least a week now.

    If it is some elaborate jok I hope he's really getting his jollies cuz I doubt anyone else is laughing.

    I'm just waiting for his rants to wander into Reptilians and Greys and all that other assorted gibberish. It's astonishing some of the things the paranoid among us believe in.

  6. Re:Being human, being cyborgs on What DARPA's Been Up To, At Length · · Score: 1

    True fact: my family does not have a TV at our home, though we do have a DVD. The result: my children actually read books, as well as watch relatively high-quality movies.

    So does this DVD you have beam the images from these relatively high-quality movies directly into your brain?

  7. Re:The teamamerica tag on Building a Global Cyber Police Force · · Score: 1

    Hah! Everytime I see or hear Matt Damon now that's the first thing that pops into my mind... LOL

  8. Re:perl 5 versus ruby versus perl 6 on The Perl 6 Advent Calendar · · Score: 1

    That would be the inertia he spoke of

  9. Re:I guess it is good news... on Google Launches Public DNS Resolver · · Score: 1

    Sssh! The paranoids get antsy when you confuse them with logic.

  10. Re:WELL on Trying To Bust JavaScript Out of the Browser · · Score: 1

    This silly bastard posts this copy-pasta all the time. No one reads it, and those who do go mad. They really just need to ban his ip, cuz it's getting old.

  11. Re:Troll: Are the lame replies the "BEST YOU'VE GO on Are Ad Servers Bogging Down the Web? · · Score: 1

    LOL indeed. I'm just sick of your brain-sick rambling. Don't you have some Delphi boards to troll or something?

  12. Re:Only MOZILLA/FF stuff protected YOUR way: Try t on Are Ad Servers Bogging Down the Web? · · Score: 1

    Please don't encourage him. His regular posts are bad enough w/o having to scroll over his bizarre, rambling replies.

  13. Re:Kind of Fitting on Are Ad Servers Bogging Down the Web? · · Score: 1

    No! Don't tempt him to write any more. That nutter is always on about HOSTS files and how Vista doesn't let him use 0 as an alias for 0.0.0.0 and how it ruined his life.

  14. Re:Geopolitical Consequences of Global Warming on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 1

    Silly AC, everyone knows that the Despotic World Government is going to slaughter Christians thus ushering in Armageddon and the return of Jeebus. Sheesh, what do they teach kids in bible camp these days?

  15. Re:Obvious... on Microsoft's Lack of Nightly Builds For IE · · Score: 1

    Nightly builds would be almost entirely used by MS shops to test their websites against. A nightly build would be hidden deep within some developer centric section of the website, Joe Sixpack wouldn't ever stumble across it. Worrying about the few clueless idiots who download alpha software w/o understanding what they're getting into are hardly even worth considering. As for people using nightlies to pick on Microsoft, those people will pick on MS nightly builds or no. So a buggy nightly gives some jackass on the internet cause to blog about how "ie9 is teh sux0rz." Oh noez.

  16. Re:Obvious... on Microsoft's Lack of Nightly Builds For IE · · Score: 1

    Nobody else uses Trident (IE's rendering engine), and if Trident breaks, a lot of other stuff in Windows breaks. They don't want to release development versions of their browser, because their corporate customers don't want users breaking things.

    As if your bog-standard clueless Windows User is going to somehow download a nightly release and hose his system. It's aimed at developers and it makes sense because people would be able to test their websites against the browser and more than likely provide useful feedback to the IE team. The few determined idiots who hose their system with a nightly build are the same idiots who'd manage to hose their system one way or another. Not releasing nightlies solely on the off chance that some schmuck in Hoboken will fuck up his system is completely absurd.

    Then again, it really part of Microsoft culture to release nightly builds of anything. That's what major version releases are for. There's always room for a service pack or 5.

  17. Re:9mm? on The Jet Fighter Laser Cannon · · Score: 1

    What you are observing here are "Gun Nerds." I can assure you that most Americans don't have anywhere near this level of knowledge of arms and weaponry. Most folks haven't ever even touched a gun, let alone fired one.

  18. Re:Non-Microsoft technologies? on Ask Sam Ramji About the CodePlex Foundation · · Score: 1

    C'mon, tell us what you really think.

  19. Re:Jack and Coke? on Caffeinated Alcoholic Drinks May Be Illegal · · Score: 1

    Can I get an amen?

  20. Re:In other news... on TSA Changes Its Rules, ACLU Lawsuit Dropped · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the traces of cocaine are from people actually consuming the drug. I somehow doubt that a drug runner would be wrapping his wares up in $20 bills.

  21. Re:OH NO!!! on Flash Vulnerability Found, Adobe Says No Fix Forthcoming · · Score: 1

    Wow, did you just make that up? Brillant!

  22. Re:Good. on Murdoch To Explore Blocking Google Searches · · Score: 1

    Silly liberal, it's not immoral, it's BUSINESS. Totally different. Really.

  23. Re:Robots.txt on Murdoch To Explore Blocking Google Searches · · Score: 1

    No can do. I already block (many of) his sites in protest of his practices.

    That'll show him. And when he finally sees the light we'll have InnerWeb to thank!

  24. Re:Really? on What Does Google Suggest Suggest About Humanity? · · Score: 1

    No, they're Jew 2.0

    Google has an independent implementation they're going to open source next year.

  25. Re:It's time to put it to a vote: on Going Head To Head With Genius On Playlists · · Score: 1

    I thought "dumb, panicky, dangerous animals" was implied by the word crowds. No sense in uncompressing a perfectly cromulent word now is there?