That would be an interesting concept. Done in the first person, where you can listen to the thought processes of the protagonist. And it isn't immediately apparent it is a robot, but initially just someone of the lower class with an implant in their brain making them respond to the "upper class." Then reveal its not a human, but a robot enduring terrible things with no choice in some situations. Suicide wouldn't even be an option to escape the torment of existence it could be.
The only way I can think of doing it would be setting up two routers, one open with no security which hands out certificates or credentials access to the second which is secure, something like registering RADIUS credentials.
The way https works is by having certificates already install on the computer which say "I trust verisign" and then verisign signs the web site owners certificates. So there was fuss on the client, only not for the user, the fuss was done by the browser creators. You'd need a more sophisticated setup in order to do something similar. And a trusted signer, and the access point would need to go to the trusted signer to sign... and it would be a lot more fuss.
Let's just hope that all those eyes are friendly. How many black hats are scouring the source code to generate exploits to sell underground? As quickly as Firefox releases patches, when these bugs aren't reported it's no better than a proprietary browser.
Except that other people are a lot more likely to find the same bug, and report it regardless of the black hats.
Re:Software Projects vs. Traditional Projects
on
Why New Systems Fail
·
· Score: 1
Microsoft Windows 8 EULA: Not for use as a personal flotation device. Do not ingest. Do not use.
Re:Software Projects vs. Traditional Projects
on
Why New Systems Fail
·
· Score: 1
I wonder if they'll do the same thing for laws. If its bad, it has to be fixed or repealed.
As for what it would mean, I doubt you'll see simple software, or subcontracting.
But you will likely see larger legal departments, they have to account for things.
Huge EULAs that state the software is guaranteed if you click X, Y, Z, in that order any other use is not permitted and may cause damage. Similar to the safety signs on curling irons "For External Use Only" which don't make it any safer.
Slashdot Mirror
That would be an interesting concept. Done in the first person, where you can listen to the thought processes of the protagonist. And it isn't immediately apparent it is a robot, but initially just someone of the lower class with an implant in their brain making them respond to the "upper class." Then reveal its not a human, but a robot enduring terrible things with no choice in some situations. Suicide wouldn't even be an option to escape the torment of existence it could be.
Wouldn't that be the same thing as Microsoft Hell?
No, but there will be.
The only way I can think of doing it would be setting up two routers, one open with no security which hands out certificates or credentials access to the second which is secure, something like registering RADIUS credentials.
The way https works is by having certificates already install on the computer which say "I trust verisign" and then verisign signs the web site owners certificates. So there was fuss on the client, only not for the user, the fuss was done by the browser creators. You'd need a more sophisticated setup in order to do something similar. And a trusted signer, and the access point would need to go to the trusted signer to sign... and it would be a lot more fuss.
Which is both usually isn't it?
Unless they don't have a liquor license. Perhaps that is why its being shut down in the first place.
That's why they hired Doc Brown and have a fleet of Deloreans.
We did not invent the Republicans. The Republicans are from Jersey. The Republicans are constantly finding Jeeves.
And why is it a big deal culturally? Would it have been a big deal if they hadn't had to make a whole game just for the beatles and just been DLC?
Soylent Green?
I thought Voldemort was British....
This is security theater, don't confuse it with security.
Would it be better if it said Bell starts DNS Fraud?
Yes, like a cell phone.
And Windows 7 isn't?
Let's just hope that all those eyes are friendly. How many black hats are scouring the source code to generate exploits to sell underground? As quickly as Firefox releases patches, when these bugs aren't reported it's no better than a proprietary browser.
Except that other people are a lot more likely to find the same bug, and report it regardless of the black hats.
good thing I don't have a C: drive
Microsoft Windows 8
EULA:
Not for use as a personal flotation device.
Do not ingest.
Do not use.
I wonder if they'll do the same thing for laws. If its bad, it has to be fixed or repealed.
As for what it would mean, I doubt you'll see simple software, or subcontracting.
But you will likely see larger legal departments, they have to account for things.
Huge EULAs that state the software is guaranteed if you click X, Y, Z, in that order any other use is not permitted and may cause damage. Similar to the safety signs on curling irons "For External Use Only" which don't make it any safer.
No, they charge the fee because its profitable, and they have no reason not to.
(Banks in the USA make some $40 Billion a year on overdraft fees)
Meta-Data
perhaps he was on an untrusted computer
The wheel does need to be reinvented from time to time. Otherwise it just gets too square.
A scientest is what GlaDOS does to scientists.
It's too much effort because American Idol is on.