I can and I did, and I will whenever it exists. Does that answer all your questions? Or are you going to continue this charade some more? Do you need a link to the definition of irony? 'cause clearly, you do no know what it means.
Well, it's too bad life isn't more like a good video game. If it were a video game, we'd be given a mission to fix the problem, the guns to do it with, and conveniently, dropped off right outside the gates. ah, sigh... that would be nice.
No. Super computers tend to not have much in the way of graphics cards. Vista will not use software rendering. But for a mere 500$, you could upgrade the beast so it could.
No, afaik, the problem of instability comes from getting the infrastructure in place, not the act of leaching energy. See, they have to dig these giant holes... Now, combine unnatural geo-formations with the act of leaching thermal energy (inserting massive cold spikes, wrt to the planet), and you wind up with a scenario where it is increasingly likely that you trigger something bad.
I dunno, I'm more inclined to believe they were hit with some kind of patent lawsuit, and just folded. Netflix operates on razor thin margins, so if there was a good chance they would lose the patent suit, it could potentially obliterate that margin.
That's not to say I would put the slimeball tactic outside of the realm of possibilities, but that just seems less likely.
Wow, so you decided that because "you" were dead wrong on something that 90% of the populous here would be at least as stupid as you and make the same mistake?
That having been said, I personally consider the television itself to be an utter waste of time (or a "lockdown" if you will) but do I post messages on Slashdot about it? Uh, ya. Apparently you do.
I can't get the script to successfully run anything other than "whoami". Has anyone else found this to actually be exploitable... or is this just a silly "hey lets make terminal output scary characters" game?
In their OEM licensing agreements, they will no longer be allowed to use disk images of for mass installation of XP. So they literally have to do a real install of XP for the customer.
If you don't know what the VM size in OSX represents, then you should not be reporting it to others. If you do know what the VM size in OSX represents, then you would know better than to ever consider it a metric, and as such, you would not be reporting it.
Wait a minute... Did you just post on a blog that some other blog doesn't like its competitor blog and that somehow this other blog is supposed to be able to decide which blogs are harmful to me?...whiney fanboy indeed...
It's not a troll. His data is not what google trends reports, and isnt even remotely comparable to what google trend reports. In short, his results do not have any use at all. So really, can anyone explain why this matters?
I find it highly unlikely that someone who can make the page in question would not be smart enough to also understand what it is that google/trend is really doing, and as such, I choose to believe instead that the author is being intentionally deceptive.
Google trends plots how popular a search phrase is. This mashup of google results is not that at all. it is nothing more than a mashup of the count of pages in google's database. it has nothing to do with how often a phrase is searched for.
Maybe what the world needs is a religion based on masturbation. They've tried volcanoes, funny underwear, pork, and lightning bolts; but never one based on The Holy Yanker. Apparently, you've never seen a study of Ancient Egyptian Mythology that wasn't censored for high school.
Slashdot Mirror
I can and I did, and I will whenever it exists. Does that answer all your questions? Or are you going to continue this charade some more? Do you need a link to the definition of irony? 'cause clearly, you do no know what it means.
Well, it's too bad life isn't more like a good video game. If it were a video game, we'd be given a mission to fix the problem, the guns to do it with, and conveniently, dropped off right outside the gates. ah, sigh... that would be nice.
gDefine: Intrepid
No. Super computers tend to not have much in the way of graphics cards. Vista will not use software rendering. But for a mere 500$, you could upgrade the beast so it could.
What happened to Blue Gene M, N and O?
Virginia
No, afaik, the problem of instability comes from getting the infrastructure in place, not the act of leaching energy. See, they have to dig these giant holes... Now, combine unnatural geo-formations with the act of leaching thermal energy (inserting massive cold spikes, wrt to the planet), and you wind up with a scenario where it is increasingly likely that you trigger something bad.
That's not to say I would put the slimeball tactic outside of the realm of possibilities, but that just seems less likely.
Wow, so you decided that because "you" were dead wrong on something that 90% of the populous here would be at least as stupid as you and make the same mistake?
What uh... what were they expecting? Web use to decline in the past 4 years?
well, ya, Kennedy's the one who corrupted it.
My IQ is 162 and I didn't get your joke. Just how smart do you have to be to get that one?
I can't get the script to successfully run anything other than "whoami". Has anyone else found this to actually be exploitable... or is this just a silly "hey lets make terminal output scary characters" game?
How bout we call it 'FF3 world record attempt' instead?
In their OEM licensing agreements, they will no longer be allowed to use disk images of for mass installation of XP. So they literally have to do a real install of XP for the customer.
ya, cause noone uses iTunes... (which incidentally, includes a front end for quicktime, which does all the media playback for itunes)
If you don't know what the VM size in OSX represents, then you should not be reporting it to others. If you do know what the VM size in OSX represents, then you would know better than to ever consider it a metric, and as such, you would not be reporting it.
Wait a minute... Did you just post on a blog that some other blog doesn't like its competitor blog and that somehow this other blog is supposed to be able to decide which blogs are harmful to me? ...whiney fanboy indeed...
It's not a troll. His data is not what google trends reports, and isnt even remotely comparable to what google trend reports. In short, his results do not have any use at all. So really, can anyone explain why this matters?
I find it highly unlikely that someone who can make the page in question would not be smart enough to also understand what it is that google/trend is really doing, and as such, I choose to believe instead that the author is being intentionally deceptive.
Google trends plots how popular a search phrase is. This mashup of google results is not that at all. it is nothing more than a mashup of the count of pages in google's database. it has nothing to do with how often a phrase is searched for.
wow, um...congrats I think? I mean, after you get over your pat on the back, can anyone explain why this matters?
Once again, I find myself rather glad that I don't know who some random celebrity is.