Slashdot Mirror


Netflix To Eliminate Profiles Feature

Donald Burr of Borg writes "One of my favorite features of Netflix, the video-rental-by-mail service, is 'profiles.' Profiles lets you create 'sub-accounts' for your friends/family, so that they can share in the video rental love. Each profile gets his/her own Netflix queue that he/she can manage with their own login/password. You can divide up how many movies get sent to you vs. the other profiles under your account. E.g. if you have a 6-out-at-once plan, you can choose to get 3 movies at a time, and have 3 other profiles each receive 1 movie. Unfortunately, the fun stops September 1, at which point Netflix is, for unknown reasons, going to terminate this feature. Why? To '...help us to continue to improve the Netflix website for all our customers.' Improvement indeed."

508 comments

  1. Yes, I received the same notice. by jggimi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do not understand what cost savings Netflix would achieve by this reduction in service.

    1. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd imagine a substantial portion of their customers will now pay for two accounts. The rest will make due with one queue for two people. It'll also reduce their maintenance cost. Pretty sleazy, nonetheless.

    2. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by deejsylvis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd assume that's the main reason -- they want to force people to sign up for additional accounts.

    3. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      I agree. I'll just rip the DVD for my mom and burn it to a DVD-RW and hand it to her, If I cycle between 2 dvd-RW's it will cover her needs. during the month.

      Netflix just encouraged me to rip and burn their discs.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      there's an up-side to this.

      lately, I've been THROTTLED (big-time). I just upgraded from a 3 at once plan to almost double that. and for the first few weeks, things came in the mail on schedule and on time.

      lately, though, things are being sent from far away centers; when I return discs directly to the PO, only some are showing up the next day at NF (I live in the silicon valley area and its ALWAYS a 1day hop from local to local!).

      there are many tricks NF is playing, but the short of it is: if you are a heavy renter, you get penalized.

      solution: go away and come back. at least that's what I have read. cancel for a month then re-join. you get a new slate and they stop throttling you (for a while, at least).

      lather rinse repeat.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by tgd · · Score: 1, Troll

      My first thought was someone sued them quietly for patent infringement and they settled.

      If that's the case, that's a big cost savings.

    6. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by malchus842 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, this feature is what makes Netflix make sense for us. I divide up our plan into two queues - one for me, one for the wife & kids. They get what they want, I get what I want (I have less time to watch, so sometimes I have a movie at home for a week or more) and we don't get in each other's way.

      Fundamentally, without this feature, Netflix becomes a pain in the butt to manage for us. Right now, I can be sure that when I send a movie back, I get one of my movies. The same goes for the others.

      I'm going to cancel on Aug 31 (and have told them so) if they don't keep this feature.

    7. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Immerial · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I'd assume that's the main reason -- they want to force people to sign up for additional accounts. Well, if you gonna do that... you should at least make it easy for people transfer their profile data to a new account. To, you know... encourage people to do it.

      NetFlix you are doing it wrong!
    8. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by BlowHole666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Netflix just encouraged me to rip and burn their discs. No you did that on your own. You just wanted some sort of justification. Your mother could just as easily get a Netflix account they are not that expensive.
      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    9. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by BlowHole666 · · Score: 0

      It is not that hard to have more then one person use the same queue. Just tell the rest of your family when they put their old movie back in the mail box to log in and select their next movie and put it at the front of the queue. So the movie the person wants is always at the front of the queue. If the movie they want is in you should have no problem. :)

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    10. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by lena_10326 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If that's the reason, why not just say "we need to charge for this now". Existing users get grandfathered in, new users must pay an extra small fee.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    11. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fozzyuw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd imagine a substantial portion of their customers will now pay for two accounts. The rest will make due with one queue for two people. It'll also reduce their maintenance cost. Pretty sleazy, nonetheless.

      Actually, from a pure consumer standpoint, this change makes no difference. Netflix already has a pricing model such that, the CHEAPEST plan is 3 DVD / time. If you move from 3 to 4 out at a time, you actually pay more and from 4 to any other number, the price is the same (per DVD at a time).

      If you had 6 at a time and choose to go to 3 at a time with 2 accounts, you'll actually save money (mere pennies, though). Since it was a separate login/password for each profile, there's no difference between having a separate account, expect for the "master user" having full view access. For those who allow their children to rent, they will still just use one account and they'll have to spend more time on their end managing their queue and that's an unfortunate hassle.

      But I think you're right. I think profiles are causing a real PITA for the site programmers to maintain code and scrapping it all together will allow faster and more flexible programming models. They're probably finding legacy code such that the programmers are like "we want to do this but the way profiles currently work, it's preventing us from doing it without a complete programming change to the profiles system".

      Instead of sinking a large cost into fixing profile code, they're probably just going to scrap it all together so they can implement whatever new and shiny features or improve database speeds or whatever.

      I thought the feature was awesome, but from a "money" standpoint, I don't see how Netflix is doing this to "screw customers" out of more money, as their current payment plans emphasis 3/time movies over any other. Unless there's some research that says that 3/time people keep their movies longer than 6/time people or something.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    12. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pretty sleazy, nonetheless.
      Why? NetFlix, as I'm sure you understand, is not some altruistic service for movie geekdom. It's a business. From their standpoint, if it is possible to increase their revenue by eliminating this "feature", then they should do it. They are in business to make money, it's not the public library.

      Any discomfort will soon be forgotten, and they may even be able to shed themselves of the dead-beat "customers" that cost them more than they make.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    13. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And everyone knows that every time you burn a DVD, your dead uncle is watching you. You know, that creepy one who always asked if you wanted your back rubbed when you took a bath. Apparently, he gets off on DVD ripping, too. So, you know, don't rip DVDs. It's bad for your soul, and pervy uncles like it.

    14. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

      I expect it's more customer retention. How many of you with siblings had this sort of conversation as a kid?

      Sibling A: But mom, I want more of Item X!
      Parent: But you already get the same amount as your brother, that's fair.
      Sibling A: But I'm older, I should get more!
      Parent: That doesn't matter, it's staying as it is.
      Sibling B: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling A: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling B: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling A: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling B: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling A: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling B: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling A: If he gets more then I want more!
      Sibling B: If he gets more then I want more!
      Parent: Right, that's enough, no Item X for either of you!

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    15. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      They have that already. It's called separate accounts.

    16. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by bryce4president · · Score: 1

      They will make more money from two accounts that receive 3 movies at a time then they will for a single account that receives 6 movies at a time. Step 3: Profit.

    17. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Hassman · · Score: 0

      What a cop out. Netflix is like 10 dollars a month for a 1 at a time. If she only watches 2 movies a month, get her a year subscription for Mother's Day or something.

      In the very least save the excuse for something that is actually unreasonably priced.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    18. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure it is. Recommendations. I love horror, my wife loves musicals. "Because you liked Saw II, we recommend Chicago". Sheesh, what a bunch of fucktards.

    19. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Gewalt · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I dunno, I'm more inclined to believe they were hit with some kind of patent lawsuit, and just folded. Netflix operates on razor thin margins, so if there was a good chance they would lose the patent suit, it could potentially obliterate that margin.

      That's not to say I would put the slimeball tactic outside of the realm of possibilities, but that just seems less likely.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    20. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CHEAPEST plan is 2 DVDs a month. =P

    21. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make roughly that much in a month supporting myself on minimum wage. No, I can't afford my own Netflix account.

    22. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      They have that already. It's called separate accounts.
      And if you want a single billing statement to 1 credit card?

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    23. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fnord666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any discomfort will soon be forgotten, and they may even be able to shed themselves of the dead-beat "customers" that cost them more than they make.
      I doubt that the customers using this feature are the ones they would like to eliminate from their customer base. I suspect that most of customers using this feature do so (like I do) in order to segregate out my selections and returns from my children's choices. They have a tendency to hang on to movies for a while before they watch them, or they watch them several times before sending them back. I didn't really care about it since it was their queue, not mine. Now it is everyone's queue and I will be sending things back in a shorter period of time. In addition, several of my friends have signed up for netflix for their households once I described this feature to them.

      This "downgrade" in service has reminded me to take another look at the market and see what other companies like Blockbuster are doing. If they are offering this service, I will probably send my Roku back and switch services.
      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    24. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God, I hate people like you.

      People who say things like, "Well, obviously, company $x is a business, so they can do whatever they want" or "Your boss pays you money to work, so you have to do whatever he says" are invariably idiots.

      NetFlix offered this feature. Some people bought the service in part because of this feature. Now it's being taken away. No discounts or temporary account upgrades or anything. Not even a way to migrate the old profiles to a new account. That's pretty sleazy.

      As for "dead-beat customers that cost them more than they make", that does not make someone a dead beat. That makes them thrifty.

      It is expected that both sides will act rationally. Customers will make the most out of their money, and NetFlix will cut features that cost them money. Calling their customers deadbeats is idiotic. But NetFlix is not handling this very well at all. They are taking something away without offering a thing. Customers are going to be pissed, and they've got a right to be.

    25. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Netflix email:

      Important News Regarding Netflix Profiles

      Dear (my name),

      We wanted to let you know we will be eliminating Profiles, the feature that allowed you to set up separate DVD Queues under one account, effective September 1, 2008.

      Each additional Profile Queue will be unavailable after September 1, 2008. Before then, we recommend you consolidate any of your Profile Queues to your main account Queue or print them out.

      While it may be disappointing to see Profiles go away, this change will help us continue to improve the Netflix website for all our customers.

      If you have any questions, please go to http://www.netflix.com/Help?p_faqid=3962 or call us anytime at 1 (888) 638-3549. We apologize for any inconvenience.

      - The Netflix Team

      My reply that I sent them:

      I am quite upset at your decision to remove Netflix Profiles. It is one of the features I use very often to queue movies for my daughter separately from ours. I fail to see how removing this valuable feature, which is most certainly NOT an improvement, will help you to "continue to improve the Netflix website" as your public relations doublespeak explains it. By removing it, you will cause me to have to manually shuffle my queue by hand every time she sends a disc back - what an inconvenience! That is NOT an improvement.

      I have been a Netflix customer for many years now, however this decision taken by you is causing me to reconsider that, and perhaps search out a competitor that DOES offer this feature. If there aren't any competitors currently out there that do offer it, I'm sure that will change shortly once they get wind of your ill-advised decision.

    26. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      The same situation here, except minus the kids. My wife will get movies to watch on her laptop while I am doing work or playing a video game. The movies in my queue are either things I would only watch, or we would watch together. She may go through 2-3 a week, I go through 1-2 a month.
      I also wrote Netflix an e-mail and really do plan on quit unless they reverse this policy. The feature is already implemented, I can't imagine it costs that much more to maintain as the code that manages the queues is already there and the mailing has got to be the same cost either way they go (profiles or not).
      Stupid move, it will surely cost them some customers (at least I hope so).

    27. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1, Funny

      I do not understand what cost savings Netflix would achieve by this reduction in service. FEAR. Customer relations is about causing FEAR in the customer. Confident customers will call the hotline all day and whine about shit. Scared customers will be grateful that some feature they like hasn't been DELETED, that the service is up and their credit card information hasn't been posted on a Russian credit card scammers mailing list.

      By deleting features, FEAR is inspired in the customers. FEAR makes them easier to handle. It's the same at home. My dog used to bark all the time and shit in the house but since I started beating it ruthless whenever I get snake eyes on my daily dice roll or see a SIGN in the shape of the clouds, it's been all sweetness and light. It's FEAR that made it better. FEAR that a fickle, heartless being with Godlike power will punish it.

      As the firedemon Machiavelli said when he was in foul human form "Let them hate, so long as they FEAR". Or the Dark Lord himself in the Language of Dark Power "Xsasoqdwho ascasfwef fhhdjso wewadsfaafop asoasocdszzzzzzzz...." I can't make the sounds in this puny human body. How I wish to be back amongst creatures of my own order.

      Hal "YHWH" Porter
      Customer Relations Manager
      Verizon
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    28. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by bilbravo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would mod you up if I could, I agree wholeheartedly. Not only does it make things more complicated to maintain for 2 people (I can't imagine 3-4) the recommendations are also going to be screwed up (even more so) now.
      Sure, it isn't difficult to maintain one queue for multiple people, but it's inconvenient. The entire purpose of Netflix is CONVENIENCE! I don't have to go to a store, I can put movies in a list and drop them in my office's mailbox after I'm done watching. Thus the allure. Now they took away a very convenient feature.
      Redbox on the way home is sounding a bit more tempting now, goodbye Netflix.

    29. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee that the separation of accounts from queues causes quite a bit of complexity (think about how that has to be implemented at the UI, class, database, and even fulfillment level). For the customer convenience of having just one billing statement to a credit card (which gets you what, exactly?) seems a little ludicrous.

    30. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by lbgator · · Score: 1

      You tell 'em Lumpy!
      damn kids... and their snot...

    31. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      Well, they're losing me and I'm sure they make plenty from me. While my wife goes through 2-3 movies a week at MOST, she normally might do 1 a week. I might go through 2 a month. We pay for 2 at a time, I'm sure we're an average customer but I can't imagine we're even remotely close to some people who rent and rip, rent and rip.
      This is truly a great feature, and I would even pay more for it. $16.99 or whatever I pay now for 2 at a time... I would happy pay a $2-3 premium if I could get the queues. To some people, it just makes sense to have them.
      Now, I know I could pay for two accounts and get the same feature for what I'm wiling to pay, but the fact is that's not as convenient and the entire point of Netflix for me is convenience. I can just stop at the Redbox and get movies on the way home now.

    32. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey - just improving the service you know!

      I love it when a firm says something this vague and contradictory when they basically realise that a thing that got people to use them is costing them too much money. I mean, if they really meant they were improving their service, then I'm fairly certain they'd say why.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    33. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?

      No. You'd probably do all your work but never save it.

    34. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious sockpuppet is obvious.

    35. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fozzyuw · · Score: 5, Informative

      The CHEAPEST plan is 2 DVDs a month. =P

      Wrong, the cheapest plan is 1 DVD with 2 per month. The cheapest per DVD plan is 3/time.

      • 1 at-a-time (2 a month) for $4.99 ($2.50 / movie flat rate)
      • 1 at-a-time (Unlimited) for $8.99 ($9/movie/time)
      • 2 at-a-time (Unlimited) for $13.99 $7/movie/time
      • 3 at-a-time (Unlimited) for $16.99 ($5.67/movie/time)
      • 4 at-a-time (Unlimited) for $23.99 ($6/movie/time)
      • 5 and up are all $6/movie/time

      The 3/time plan use to be $6/movie, but they dropped the price of that plan by $1/movie as a move to bring Blockbuster Online members back as Blockbuster raised their rates (twice) and by some plans, a massive amount (like 66%).

      Tossing out the limited number rental, lowest tier plan, the best deal for any Netflix user is 3/time, assuming you pick a plan that allows you to watch the same number of films a week as you plan allows per time. Meaning, 1 movie a time means you'll watch 1 movie a week, 3 movies at a time and you'll watch 3 movies a week. Which I think it probably about what Netflix expects you to watch and will throttle people to this degree.

      The difference is very negligible. That would amount to a cost of $1.41 a movie for 3/time and $1.50 per movie for anything above that. (Assuming the watching habits I described) To round out the numbers, it's $1.75 per movie at 2/time and $2.25 per movie at 1/time (based on a standard 28 day / 4-week month which obviously isn't an exact monthly schedule given most months have more than 28 days)

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    36. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from a pure consumer standpoint, this change makes no difference. Netflix already has a pricing model such that, the CHEAPEST plan is 3 DVD / time. If you move from 3 to 4 out at a time, you actually pay more and from 4 to any other number, the price is the same (per DVD at a time).
      [snip]
      I thought the feature was awesome, but from a "money" standpoint, I don't see how Netflix is doing this to "screw customers" out of more money, as their current payment plans emphasis 3/time movies over any other. Unless there's some research that says that 3/time people keep their movies longer than 6/time people or something. My family would be going from a 3 at-a-time plan ($16.99) to a 2 at-a-time plan ($13.99) and a 1 at-a-time plan ($8.99). How's that going to save us money? (And, no, we cannot just continue using the 3 at-a-time plan.)
    37. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by stever1975 · · Score: 0

      I really don't see how difficult it is to maintain the extra profiles feature. I think what it really comes down to is money. As of right now I have the 4 dvd plan. On that plan my wife has one of the four disc, I have the other three ( I'm greedy).
      With my current plan I'm paying:
      $23.99

      Once they switch over in september if I still want to have a seperate queue for the wife I'll have to get:
      3 disc plan at $16.99
      1 disc plan at $8.99
      coming to a grand total of: $25.98
      which is 2 dollars more than I'm paying currently. And I'm sure with their huge customer base this adds up. Very much doubt if it has anything to do with programming.

    38. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be a PITA to maintain. But if they want to implement more features and can't because of the legacy coding, would it not make sense to keep this feature until the new code is ready?

    39. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by lena_10326 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can guarantee that the separation of accounts from queues causes quite a bit of complexity
      My suggestion did not imply changing whatever core schema Netflix uses. Permitting profiles to remain would be less destructive.

      I don't have a netflix account so I have to fly blind here, but I fail to see why you would say that. Netflix is going to have a unique id tied to a customer account and several ids tied to profiles (1->N). The billing would be tied to the customer account and so would tables with a 1 to 1 relation to the customer. Billing usually consists of line items with everything broken down. A charge for an extra profile would simply be another line item. Enumerating profiles and appending them to the billing statement is not complex at all, assuming one didn't design a bass-ackwards schema.

      Cutting a bunch of tables out of the system and having to resolve broken dependencies is more complex.

      Also, some systems as a rule prohibit entering the same CC on different accounts. Of course, the reasons for doing so are somewhat arbitrary and debatable, but once a system implements that many dependencies wind up cropping up that require the credit info be unique (name/expiry/cc number).
      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    40. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by computechnica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The big problem is if you have seperate accounts the chances of renting the same movie goes up. With Profiles if you selected a movie that is already on another profile it would warn you of duplicates.

    41. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This cost analysis only makes sense under certain assumptions. My family, for example, is at the 3-out level. There's one disc allocated to the kids profile, two to my wife and me. Splitting those would cost substantially more. I wonder what the typical Netflix profile is. If a substantial majority of users are at the 6-out level, then you might be right, this might not be an attempt to get people to spend more money. If, however, 3-out is the most popular plan, then I think it's likely that this is exactly what's going on.

    42. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      NetFlix offered this feature. Some people bought the service in part because of this feature. Now it's being taken away. No discounts or temporary account upgrades or anything. Not even a way to migrate the old profiles to a new account. That's pretty sleazy. Sleazy would be canceling it 'effective immediately'. They sent out email to me (got it last night) saying 'Hey, in just over 2 months, we're not gonna offer this service anymore'. That's not sleazy. Somewhere a decision was made to discontinue it, and they are giving their customers fair notice.

      If people feel that strongly and that feature was a maker and breaker for them, they should cancel their service (aka: stop giving them money). When you do so, be sure to let them know why.. and unlike people that quit MMOs, do so in an intelligent manner.

      There are in fact other competing services.. I don't know if they offer the same feature. I guess you have a similar thing at Ye Olde Video Store where the person just sorta picks up what they want... a crazy idea I know.. but it worked pretty well in the past.

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    43. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I doubt people will sign up for two accounts. They'll just share one queue like most of us do anyway. I imagine that its being canceled because not many people where using it.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    44. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      As a consumer, it does make a difference.

      Our netflix setup:

      1 for me
      1 for wife
      1 for TV series (watched slower)

      We had dropped netflix for a while because we weren't watching enough and started considering it again. This torpedos it.

    45. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      I think you've missed my point. I mean they can simplify their system without this. As-is, you have multiple queues tied to a single account, so they are not 1:1. Also, DVDs that are sent out need to be marked with the queue, rather than the account. The UI is different for the profile accounts, and there are special things that the profile owner can do, such as change the split. All this code and complexity goes away if you get rid of this feature, and most people will probably realize that signing up for multiple accounts is only a little more expensive and do that instead.

    46. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      Your mother could just as easily get a Netflix account they are not that expensive. I'm not saying ripping dvd's is the answer, but "not that expensive" is rather subjective. Netflix is basically taking away a free account.

      If this were MySQL taking away the free version of their software, everyone would use PostgreSQL.
    47. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by imstanny · · Score: 1

      Actually, from a pure consumer standpoint, this change makes no difference. Netflix already has a pricing model such that, the CHEAPEST plan is 3 DVD / time. If you move from 3 to 4 out at a time, you actually pay more and from 4 to any other number, the price is the same (per DVD at a time). Indeed, which is why I am currently on the 3 DVD plan. However, I logged in last night to update my Que and I got an offer to upgrade my 3 DVD plan ($16.99) to a 4 DVD plan for an additional $1.86 -- which, if you do the math, makes the 4 DVD plan even cheaper. I'm debating on what to do, since I don't even utilize the 3 DVD plan very efficiently.
    48. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I hate people like you.

      I find it interesting that you comment on a guys post with a holier-than-thou attitude because the GP described the possibility of some customers being "deadbeat" for a company but feel perfectly fine stepping in and toss around words like "hate you" and calling a business "sleazy". Out of the two, I'd take him over you any day as his character is clearly more tolerant than your own as he didn't even specifically point fingers at anymore, like you are. Read a book on tolerance and then take some anger management classes because you have issues.

      No discounts or temporary account upgrades or anything. Not even a way to migrate the old profiles to a new account. That's pretty sleazy.

      That might be your biased subjective hateful opinion but in an objective view, there is nothing remotely "sleazy" about what they're doing. There was no back-handed promises or insinuations given. There was no marketed "we have profiles and will ALWAYS have profiles". There was nothing in their TOS about having to provide "profiles" to their customers, even at the cost of their business. They're not pulling any bait and switch tactics and they're not reducing your ability to rent movies. They're taking away a feature that I think a lot of people liked with very little clear explanation. That's unfortunate and bad business PR, but it's not sleazy.

      Get off your high horse already, learn something about life and grow up.

    49. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by BlowHole666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Netflix is basically taking away a free account. Netflix is not taking away a free account. If you had a 3 movie out account you are still paying for the 3 move out account. It just let you have two queues. So now you just have to manage your own queue rather then have netflix have software manage the other queue.
      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    50. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      Ive been using the feature for a while so set aside one of my 3 discs for my kids. i sure as hell wont get another account...and since it just subdivides an existing account, i have a hard time seeing how the maintenance or anything else could be that much of a problem. meh, ill keep netflix, i used it for a long time without having the profiles to start with, theyre just damn handy.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    51. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I won't hire you. By not inhaling you are showing that you make yourself deliberately incapable of utilising available resources in the best possible manner. This needs working on.

    52. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by roaddemon · · Score: 1

      As a dev lead, I would be ashamed to have to tell management that we have to remove a feature because we aren't competent enough to support it. Obviously any feature deserves a cost benefit analysis, and if cost trumps benefit then it's gone; otherwise that's just embarrassing.

    53. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Sancho · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's pretty disappointing.

      We share a two-disc plan with two profiles. We switched away from Blockbuster Online in part because of the profiles that Netflix offers. Without that, we're at least dropping down to a 1 disc plan, and we may drop the service altogether.

    54. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by SkyDude · · Score: 2, Insightful
      God, I hate people like you.

      People who say things like, "Well, obviously, company $x is a business, so they can do whatever they want" or "Your boss pays you money to work, so you have to do whatever he says" are invariably idiots.

      Hate? Wow, you must have a difficult life.

      A business can do as it pleases if there is a financial justification to do so. You as a consumer, can stop doing business with such a business if you don't like the change. It's not like NF has a monopoly on mail order rentals.

      That's called choice, and we all have the right to make it. In this case, a good thing is going away. A lot of comments on here have the change related to database management issues, but I'd guess that's a small part of the issue. Most likely, supporting multiple warehouses around the country and the rise in postal rates is putting pressure on their profits. The Netflix folks looked at the features that make the least amount of profit and decided to drop the profiles plan.

      It's not the end of the world. It's DVD rentals for gawd's sakes.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    55. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Kennon · · Score: 1

      I agree and disagree with you all at once. I became a Netflix subscriber after Blockbuster On-line jacked my rates twice in one year and limited me to 5 in-store envelope return rentals a month. The trade-off for me was the Watch it Now for the in-store rental returns. Well now Blockbuster On-line has lost a boatload of customers because of their crazy price structure they have again lowered their monthly rates and gone back to the online/in-store hybrid and started offering good incentives. IF I used this profile feature that Netflix was about to eliminate I would seriously consider canceling Netflix and resubscribing to Blockbuster. Sending in disgruntled letters and such is all well and good as long as it works but leveraging the market with your dollars is better. Let Netflix see 10,000 customers cancel within 30 days or so of ending the profile thing and then let them weigh the money lost versus the costs of maintaining that feature. In the end someone might get fired and they will rewrite something comparable to the profiles feature or just bring the old one back. Business is a gamble. The goal is to offer the best quality product/service you can afford to make for the price the most people are willing to pay. Companies like Netflix and Blockbuster are run by people who make mistakes. From a consumer perspective it is our job to make sure they realize when they've made that mistake. Don't feel like just because you have been a Netflix customer for X years you will just have to live with whatever they do.

      --
      "All those moments, will be lost in time...like tears in rain..."
    56. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't buy this crap about it being in the name of customer service ether. I call BullShit! If they really wanted to improve the customer service they would get rid of those fucking sliders / wheel / or whatever they are on the new releases page. I don't want to have to view new releases by clicking on arrows and seeing them 5 at a time. I want them flashed up on one page like they used to so I can view them all at once.

      Fucking pain in the Ass.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    57. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by rfunches · · Score: 1

      most people will probably realize that signing up for multiple accounts is only a little more expensive and do that instead

      2 DVDs at a time unlimited: $13.99

      1 DVD at a time unlimited * 2 plans = $8.99 * 2 = $17.98

      3 DVDs at a time unlimited: $16.99

      It looks like a marginal cost...until you realize it's $1 less for three DVDs.

    58. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by ubrgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (I'm sure someone in another post already pointed this out, but I'm too lazy to check.) The fact that this is happening is old news. Been the case for a few years, despite their claim that they were taking steps to fix it.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    59. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      Anger management? Who said I'm angry? I said I hate people like him.

      But OK, maybe I need a hate management course? Of course, I gave a reason for saying what I said. It's that the viewpoint is idiotic because it's way too simplistic. It ignores the fact that businesses need their customers to survive, and that even investors have morals. If you prefer toleration of idiocy, then be my guest. But please, try not to confuse people who don't suffer fools with people who are angry and bitter.

      Next up, about my "biased subjective hateful opinion" (as opposed to an objective opinion? ;-)) perhaps it would help if you consulted a dictionary. Sleazy means "mean, or contemptuously low". I think that taking away features that customers love is mean, it's bad PR, and they haven't offered any migration path or apology gifts. They have, in fact, tried to spin this as helping customers (check the wording of the emails). All together, it seems pretty low.

      (As a side note, they do reduce people's ability to rent movies (Google for NetFlix throttling), which is also kind of sleazy because they didn't actually mention that little fact until after they were sued about it, but that's pretty ancillary to my point here.)

      But I guess calling a spade a spade will always be considered hateful by some people. You'll note, of course, that I haven't said NetFlix isn't allowed to do this or even that they shouldn't. I'm just saying they should try to be a bit nicer to their customers so as not to alienate them. If you read some of the other comments here, you'll see that there are plenty of people who are either canceling their service or at least looking elsewhere.

      I bet if NetFlix had said that they would offer a discounted account for people using profiles so that they could continue to pay the same, but for multiple accounts, pretty much everybody would shrug and say, "I don't like it, but that seems fair." As is, it reads more like some underhanded way of getting people to pay more money for the same things.

      Anyway, I don't have a high horse. Never learned to ride one, really. If you take issue with why I singled out that post, please feel free to respond to my points after the first line. Until then, you don't have much grounds to object to my hatred.

    60. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Keyslapper · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm in full agreement here. I never tried BB Online, partly because I was in full backlash mode over their handling of late charges. Later, when they "eliminated" late charges, I was completely disgusted with the fact they actually just renamed them to "restocking fee". If I kept a movie for more than 10 days, they charged my account for the full value (or what they thought the movie was worth) and refunded it, less a restocking fee when I returned it.

      So, I'm taking it BB Online doesn't have profiles? I actually went online last night to see if I could find out for sure, but didn't find anything definitive.

      BTW, I also wrote a letter to Netflix letting them know how much I enjoyed their service, and the fact that profiles were the key ingredient in my decision to join NF. I also made it clear that without profiles, there was a very good chance I would no longer see much value in their service. My wife likes mystery, romance and Jane Austen, I like MI5, The 4400, Battlestar, Will Smith, Sci-Fi and psychological thrillers. Our daughter gets kids disks and will keep them for a week or two.

      We don't always cycle at the same pace, so profiles make it possible for us to enjoy it more.

      At the very least, I'll be dropping my service, but in all likelihood, I'll be dropping it. And probably not in favor of BB. I'm just up the road from a Hollywood Video, so who knows ...

      Cheers.

      Netflix, You're doing it wrong!

    61. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be a single billing statement? Do you save money if you have a single statement? Does your bank/other financial institution charge you per-transaction?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    62. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      It will also screw up one of their biggest claims to fame...the ranking and recommendation. When my GF was living with me she had her own queue. I didn't want her rating chick flicks with 5 stars on my account and she didn't want me ranking my movies on her's.

      What are husband and wife to do now? I have two co-workers who I introduced the feature to who now use it too.
      This is really LAME!
      Since you can move movies around on your queue fairly easily I hope someone comes up with an abstraction to NetFlix which lets you manage multiple queues and have that service manipulate your one real NetFlix queue to give you the same result. Although, that wouldn't solve the ratings / rankings...I guess only the main account would be able to do that.

    63. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it looks like I may have been wrong and this service is more popular than I thought it was. I guess they are really phasing it out is to get rid of dead weight and households sharing accounts. Several house holds get together and get one account with a high number of disks to be taken out. Then they just create a separate profile for each house hold and only pay for one account.

      I have to admit I though of doing just that for my dad who live across the road. He would have only gotten one dvd a month. He just asks what dvds I get now and if there is one he is interested in he'll borrow it before I return it or just come over and watch it with us.

      Netflix isn't losing any money off him though. He'll never sign up for a netflix account. I tried to give him one, he just wasn't interested.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    64. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NetFlix offered this feature. Some people bought the service in part because of this feature. Now it's being taken away. No discounts or temporary account upgrades or anything. Not even a way to migrate the old profiles to a new account. That's pretty sleazy.

      I don't understand why it's sleazy. It's rude, and it's a good reason to cancel your account, but it's not like you had to make some investment to use netflix. It's a monthly fee, they're free to change the terms of service, and you're free to stop using netflix.

      Customers are going to be pissed, and they've got a right to be.

      Agreed. But it still doesn't make netflix sleazy. Just stupid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    65. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      I use he same plan. 3 at a time unlimted. 2 for me, 1 for my wife. Keeping one account at 3 at a time with my tastes and my wife's i would be a mess. Switching to two accounts costs more.

      Not thrilled

    66. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by morari · · Score: 1
      We have to justify it nowadays? Geeze.

      I thought "because it's cheaper than buying twenty-four films a month" was a good enough excuse reason. I have the three-at-a-time plan however, so I generally manage to get two batches a week if I send them back the same day. ;)

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    67. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly. I have over 1000 movies rated under my own profile which is secondary to the main profile of my wife. Now if they do this, not only will we lose ability to maintain separate queues (which is very important, because our tastes are not completely overlapping), I will lose all the ratings which was essential to get new suggestions. New suggestions were one of the main resources for me to find new movies according to my taste.

      I am a big fan of Netflix for all the good reasons, but this decision is almost a deal-breaker to me. Give me a fucking chance to get my history and data back.

    68. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      Nope, I've got a pretty good life.

      I hate people who make statements like that, because those statements are idiotic. I've also got no problems with what NetFlix is trying to do. I'm just annoyed that they are trying to spin this as good for the customer while degrading their service. It's dishonest. They're doing this because it makes good business sense. They probably should do it, but they should try a little harder to be nice to their customers in doing so.

      Yes, it's just DVD rentals. But I don't like companies who try to spin everything, whatever their wares. But I have a NetFlix account and I'm not canceling it. I just like the company a little less than I did yesterday.

    69. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sending the mail out early is good psychology. People will get into an uproar over it now, but it will die down. They'll think, "We'll cancel our accounts on August 31!" but by the time that that date rolls around, even if they remember the issue, they'll probably have resigned themselves to it and will keep the service.

    70. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by morari · · Score: 0, Troll
      Shhh! Don't tell them that!

      I really hope that all of these people do quit because of this subtle omission of features. Maybe then I can stop being hit by "Very long Wait" tags throughout my queue.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    71. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be a single billing statement?
      Convenience. 1 bill to pay rather than 2. 1 less check to write or 1 less online bill to pay. OK, let's assume auto-bill pay. Fewer transactions junking up my billing history. If I want to search for a specific transaction, I have less history to page through. Also, fewer transactions means I'm more likely to spot something bogus.

      Do you save money if you have a single statement?
      I get paper statements, so actually it does. It saves the company less in postage and paperwork so their costs are slightly less. And 1 less stamp for me to mail them a paper check (I'm archaic).

      An explanation for above: I don't use bill pay for everything because it makes it difficult to plan when you forget when the bill pays will hit your account. I only use it for the biggies: phone bill and college loans. My other online bill pays are done manually so I can plan better.

      Also, fewer statements to archive in the filing cabinet. I file *everything*, that's why I like paper statements, and I know I've got access to them long after my account is deactivated.

      Does your bank/other financial institution charge you per-transaction?
      No.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    72. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      And, no, we cannot just continue using the 3 at-a-time plan.

      May I ask why not?

      From your stated purpose, you'll be inconvenienced for sure, but all you'll have to do is keep the movies that use to belong to the "one" queue at the bottom of the main queue. When the person who had the "one" movie finishes their movie and mails it back, they'll have to click the "move-to-top" button on their movie of choice, which will be sent out next. It will end up functioning fairly similar than before but take a little more effort on the part of the customer.

      It's your decision to pay more to get the convenience of multiple queues, but somehow I think you won't or you'll quit (at least for a short time out of anger, until your realize there's no better value for DVD rentals) and your (and other people's) current anger at Netflix is directed more at the fact that there's very little transparency as to why Netflix would remove a perfectly awesome customer favored feature to "improved their website".

      If they had better PR, they would have said "this feature is costing us "x", "y", or "z" and we're removing it to avoid a price increase due to the increase to our costs thanks to the sky rocketing energy costs and inflation."

      I'm sure it would pacify a lot more customers to have been given a good explanation. Otherwise, you'll just get what we're seeing, pissed off customers claiming "sleazy" and "underhanded" "evil corporate" policies to "screw the customer".

      Which, if any pissed off customer could calm down for a moment and think, makes no sense at all. What possible benefit could Netflix have REMOVING a favored feature that's already implemented? There's either some sort of excess cost it's causing Netflix (extra database servers? Man hours to maintain?) or this feature is causing some sort of legacy code issue that's preventing some kind of site upgrade (as possibly related to their "website improvement" excuse). Or, it very well could be the underhanded evil plan to get people to purchase more accounts. However, if it was pure malice, you'd have to believe that the people running Netflix believe the customers are dumb enough to fall for it, which I find to be a much harder premise to believe (for anyone not wearing a tin-foil hat that is).

      So, either we'll have to accept that fact that Netflix is stupid enough to just willingly piss of their customer base for no gain or a loss (because the pissed off customers won't fall for their malice and simply quit) or there's an actual reason why they're removing this feature, to save money, and possible prevent having to force a price increase upon their customers thanks to spiraling out of control energy costs and inflation.

      Cheers
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    73. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by FiveLights · · Score: 1

      I was very upset about this when I heard about it this morning. However, I've discovered that if the wife and I switch to two 1 movie at a time (2 per month) plans, we'll be paying less than we pay for our two movie at a time (shared with two queues) unlimited plan. I don't think we actually get more than two movies each per month so we'll switch and pay three or four bucks less each month.

    74. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk about the customers' right to be pissed, and at the same time, ridicule the GP for his "Well, obviously, company $x is a business, so they can do whatever they want" attitude.

      Netflix has the right to run their business the way they want to, just as the customers have a right to be pissed. Netflix doesn't owe the customers anything. They can piss people off and run their business into the ground at their will. And the people will move on to something better. So what's the problem?

    75. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Average · · Score: 1

      I doubt that the customers using this feature are the ones they would like to eliminate from their customer base. It's possible that, in aggregate, they are.

      They've kept the profiles feature pretty unadvertised and hidden. Lots of Netflix users seem to have never heard of it.

      Perhaps the profiles users are, statistically, the people most likely to rent, rip, and return the next day. The not-terribly-savvy users are, possibly, the ones who've never heard of ripping a DVD, and rent the same mass-market movie over and over, then forget to send it in for weeks at a time.
    76. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Read above:

      According to their customer support, this was a feature only used by 1% of subscribers If that's the case, there's no way "a substantial portion" will do anything different.
    77. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by The+Mad+Debugger · · Score: 1

      I agree. Unfortuantely, there doesn't seem to be a way to respond directly to their email, but they do have a suggestions page.

      I have "suggested" that they keep this feature, and "suggested" that I will cancel my service or significantly reduce it if they do not.

      I don't know if they will actually read and heed them or not, but it's worth a shot:

      http://www.netflix.com/Suggest?type=2&lnkctr=cu_suggest

    78. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by rthille · · Score: 1

      According to my account:

      Your current period price is $16.99 (plus any applicable tax) .

      That's because I'm 'grandfathered' in at 4 movies because I've been using NetFlix since 1999. Switching to two 2-at-a-times would up our costs significantly... Given that my wife doesn't do a good job of keeping her queue full, we'll probably just manually manage the single queue, but I'll still fire off a complaint to NetFlix about this.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    79. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I realize that there was a legal settlement a few yrs ago with NF.

      but they have NOT changed their ways, not in any significant way. read their TOS - they have the slipperiest weasel words possible.

      they STILL do ALL the things they were accused of. they have not changed one bit, other than their WORDING on their site.

      its deeply built into their business model, I guess. but its still WRONG to say 'unlimited' when its clearly not at all unlimited.

      I live 20 minutes drive from their los gatos main center. I drop my dvd's in the mail AT THE POST OFFICE early in the AM. I am 99.9% certain that each one does get from sunnyvale to san jose in a day. there is just no way in hell it can take more than that; so why do discs not show up as 'received' until about 2 days later?

      and even then, some of them 'downgrade' to shipping tomorrow over the course of the day. I check NF at 7am and I see that 2 have been received and are said to be shipping today. but later in the day, mysteriously they change to shipping tomorrow. yet my queue has over 300 entries!

      they are still throttling. and they are lying thru their teeth about it every time they deny it.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    80. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true, this doesn't "screw customers" moving from 1 account with 6 DVDs to 2 accounts with 3 DVDs each... but what about everyone who doesn't fit into that formula (and I would assume that many people are not currently at the 6 DVD plan, considering how expensive it is).

      For example, moving from the 4 DVD plan (23.99) with one queue of 3 and one queue of 1 (my house's current set up) would require two accounts, one paying 16.99 and one paying 8.99. Now our bill will be almost $26. Sure, it's only 2 dollars, but we'll be paying that extra money to be inconvenienced.

    81. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by zoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, if you gonna do that... you should at least make it easy for people transfer their profile data to a new account. To, you know... encourage people to do it. That would be openly acknowledging that the real reason they're making this change is to force you to have two accounts. They'd rather be able to claim they're doing it to "improve the Netflix website for all their customers", even if the reason makes no sense.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    82. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by theun4gven · · Score: 1

      Indeed, which is why I am currently on the 3 DVD plan. However, I logged in last night to update my Que and I got an offer to upgrade my 3 DVD plan ($16.99) to a 4 DVD plan for an additional $1.86 -- which, if you do the math, makes the 4 DVD plan even cheaper. I'm debating on what to do, since I don't even utilize the 3 DVD plan very efficiently. Check things out first. I had the same offer and found that the additional cost (in your case $1.86) meant they'd send you that extra disc for the rest of the month. After that you go up to the 4 discs at a time price which is about $7 more a month. I almost fell for that too until I kept reading and realized that was prorated through the end of this month only.
    83. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by niktemadur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whenever the bank, phone company or any other large corporation sends me a form letter that begins along the lines of "In order to provide a better service to you, our valued customer...", immediately I recoil, 'cause I know I'm just about to be hit with some sort of diminished service.

      Take the airliners a decade and a half ago. "In order to provide a better service to you, our valued customer, we will eliminate the olive from the salad in our in-flight meal", all because some smart ass junior exec figured out that the airliner could save up to twenty thousand dollars a year, from a budget of billions, by eliminating the olives. Slippery slope from there, pretty soon the whole salad was gone, and all we were left with was boiled peas, know what I mean?

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    84. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      I am similarly stuck. I usually set-up my queue once every few months. I prefer to just throw twenty movies I want to see in there and then just never login until I think I'm getting close to running out. Logging in and moving one of my movies to the top of the queue so that I get one back instead of my wife is *not* convenient. Might as well just go back to driving to the friggin' movie store. As soon as I got Netflix this was the first feature I looked for and I configured it immediately. Taking it away is just crazy. If they're trying to stop people from sharing accounts - just do it by preventing different addresses. Don't take away profiles. ugh.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    85. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      I really don't see how difficult it is to maintain the extra profiles feature.

      I admit that I don't see how much cost this feature is to maintain either, and speaking from a website and database programmer and developer. I think this is the point that Netflix should really have been more clear as to why they're removing it. They currently haven't been.

      I think what it really comes down to is money.

      It always comes down to money and Netflix isn't claiming differently. They claim they're removing the feature to improve their website. What kind of improvement? For it to cost them less money would be an improvement. For them and for you. Netflix keeping their costs down allow them to keep their prices down. I could continue to speculate as to other reasons, but I think that's the real point is that Netflix is not being transparent enough with there message and are blowing their PR.

      For all we know, there decision could be saving ALL their customers money, at the inconvenience of those who used profiles now having to spend some more time managing a single queue by moving movies around, instead of the set and forget features they had before, which I freely admit are a great feature (I'm not happy they're removing them, even when I don't use them).

      if I still want to have a seperate queue

      True, you'll have to pay for that convenience (a convenience that was once free). Ideally, I would hope they drop all their "unlimited" plans to be a standard price per DVD, such as "$6 per move at-a-time" no matter what plan you take. That would pretty much make this whole debate pointless as the lower 2 plans are not the same price per movie as the others.

      However, I think most people would deal with the extra inconvenience than pay more. I believe the inconvenience is being over blow. It's not hard to click the "move-to-top" button to make the next movie available.

      For your example, you're wife will have to keep all her moves at the bottom of the queue, which will require re-ordering some films once in a while, an easy process, and when she's done with her 1 movie, she'll have to log in and click the "move-to-top" button on her next movie in the queue. Her movie will be the next sent out.

      It definitely sucks,but I believe people will take the hit to convenience over a price increase.

      Of course, the real question is: what is Netflix's true motivation? I'd sure like to know! They're not being very open about it so far and if it is a malicious attempt to drive more people to the 1 or 2 at-a-time higher margin plans, then I hope they crash and burn. However, just like the American legal system, I prefer to assume their innocent until proven guilty, despite the court of public opinion preferring the other method.

      Cheers
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    86. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by harrkev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True, but managing your own queue takes time. Right now, I have my queue, my wife has hers, and we have a shared queue for things that we like to watch together. Not having separate queues will take a bit of juggling. I get one DVD at a time, and it may take me a week or two to watch it. My wife goes through three a week. It will be a pain to keep everything balanced.

      The separate queues is, to me, their chief advantage over Blockbuster. I don't really watch Netflix downloadable movies (and hate being forced into using Windows and IE even if I did), so that is no advantage there. Once the queues go away, I will re-examine which service I want to use. If Blockbuster wins on price, they will get my money instead. If Blockbuster takes advantage of this opporrunity and adds separate queues to their service, they score a slam-dunk and I will switch without a second thought or a bit of regret (I hope somebody from Blockbuster reads this). Being able to exchange one or two movies a month in the store is also very convenient, and a big plus in the Blockbuster column.

      1) Make customers angry and shoot self in foot.
      2) ???
      3) Profit.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    87. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 3, Funny

      Boiled peas?? Luxury! When I was young we got boiled SAND on airplanes. And we were thankful!

    88. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      There is no problem. I think we're in violent agreement. The problem comes when people say that "company $x is a business, so they can do whatever they want" without the necessary qualification that, if they do, they will "run their business into the ground."

      All I'm saying is that there are consequences, even for businesses. Basically, it's the people who forget the "enlightened" part of "enlightened self-interest". If it's not enlightened, then self-interest doesn't generally look out for your interests very well.

    89. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      It could be a PITA to maintain. But if they want to implement more features and can't because of the legacy coding, would it not make sense to keep this feature until the new code is ready?

      Which is a good point and not something I fully thought through on my first post. Which can only lead me to believe that a) the feature simply costs a lot more to maintain for the little, but appreciated convenience it offers some of it's customers or b) it is simply a malicious attempt to drive people towards the higher margin plans (unless they also plan on changing their lower plan prices to be inline with their higher plan prices but haven't announced it yet for some reason).

      Either way, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and demand greater transparency to their actions (as a customer myself) so I can make a better value judgment to just dump them all together for their actions, even if they're not affecting me.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    90. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Can you afford cable TV? I was once on cable TV until I realized I was paying $60 a month ($2 a day). Figuring I would have to watch a lot of TV everday (I only watched a couple shows), I realized I could just switch to netflix for far less, with movie quality and not tv show quality viewing.

      So that's how I made the trade-off to netflix and am currently happy with it. I may stop putting 3 DVDs in 1 envelope to prevent them saving money on postage though if they do this, just to offset their gains. I don't know how bulk postage works, but I assume its based on ACTUAL letters sent?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    91. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 1

      But NetFlix is not handling this very well at all. They are taking something away without offering a thing. A while back, Netflix did something that, in my experience, no other service provider has ever done--they sent me an e-mail indicating they were cutting the monthly rate on my current plan. For no reason.

      Maybe this was why?

      We may never know. I do think it's weird to jump all over NetFlix for cutting out elements of their service--companies do this all the time. It bothers me more when my phone company does it (and then raises its rates), since where I live there aren't really other telecommunications options. But NetFlix is a luxury service, not a utility provider, and they also aren't a monopoly. So yes, in that sense, "NetFlix is a business, so they can do whatever they want." If people purchased the service based on a particular feature, and that feature is eliminated, those people can cancel the service. They're not entitled to profiles, any more than NetFlix is entitled to customers.

      If you want to be upset, be upset about throttling--they did that without telling anyone. (That, I though, was pretty sleazy.) But here you get an e-mail several months in advance of a change being made above board, so that you as a consumer can decide whether their service will still be worth what you're paying, and can drop them if you think it isn't. Seems like they're making progress.
    92. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by mzs · · Score: 1

      until your realize there's no better value for DVD rentals


      Local library FTW, they even let me manage a queue online of movies I wish to see from libraries all over the state. I do have to actually go to the library though and when no library is willing to send the dvd, they often simply purchase it. That requires a phone call though.

    93. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      And everyone knows that every time you burn a DVD, your dead uncle is watching you.

      You bastard! I just ruined yet another keyboard. Goddamn it, why do I insist on drinking beer while reading Slashdot? While ripping the DVDs (about kittens and stuff, you really rather not know) I inherited from my uncle?
      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    94. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by bigdavesmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      I realize it's a small sample, but 100% of the 6 people I know who have netflix accounts use this feature, for a total of 13 profiles.

      I know that once Netflix drops profiles, I'll be dropping netflix in favor of Blockbuster.

    95. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by cshabazian · · Score: 5, Informative

      I also emailed them with my dissatisfaction with this choice. A good email campaign (no flames, just "I'm disappointed and will vote with my dollars type of email) can help.
      Here are the addresses I sent to:
      Leslie Kilgore - VP Marketing : lkilgore@netflix.com
      Reed Hastings - President: rhastings@netflix.com
      publicrelations@netflix.com

    96. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by cshabazian · · Score: 5, Informative

      oops, forgot the updated/correct email for Reed:
      reed.hastings@netflix.com

    97. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix is a service, and they're reducing the quality of their service. The way you defend their actions on here, I have to wonder what they're paying you ;)

      Lots of people use this feature, lots of people don't want to manually manage multiple queues, and it's not possible to manage multiple ratings. I've been paying netflix my $35 a month for a level of service, and now they're removing things from that service, that are either impossible to do, or I have to now do myself. If I wanted to pay people money to do nothing, I'd do my taxes!

    98. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by plasmasurfer · · Score: 0

      I don't either and they failed to explain it in their notice. I wrote to them explaining my displeasure though I refrained from threatening to switch to Blockbuster. Let's use our collective power as consumers and swamp them with our annoyance at this asinine "improvement". There is a link at the bottom of the NF page that says "Contact Us". Well *Contact Them*

      --
      To spot the expert, pick the one who predicts the job will take the longest and cost the most.
    99. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with renting the same movie more than once? If the people in different profiles don't watch the movies together, then let them both watch the movie when they want it. If they do watch them together (just have different profiles to balance who gets to pick the movie), then the one who gets it second will probably remember (hey, we just watched that, I'll take it off the queue).

    100. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by bigdavesmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wouldn't even mind paying more. The real problem with this, at least for me, is that they're basically lying to me as a customer. If I got a notice in my email that said "Hey, look, we're either going to have to charge you $3 more a month for this feature, or get rid of it because we're not making enough money." I'd be way cooler with it. Telling me they're improving my experience by ruining it is just plain treating me like an idiot, and I can get that kind of treatment just by driving down to blockbuster, which is where I'll be going September 1st if they seriously do this.

    101. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Funny

      Psah. We had to bring our own sand. Hot. And bags were strictly banned from flights, so you carried your sand in your hands.

      And that's the way we likes'd it.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    102. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's right, you're entitled. I forgot.

      Have you ever created a product that lots of people use but that you needed to change?

      Sometimes it's necessary to change the product even though some people will hate the changes. But to call them "sleazy" for doing it? C'mon! They're likely doing it for some genuine reason that they are painfully aware will upset some people. But they can't be bitched into doing what you want.

      *Some* customers will be pissed, sure, but be realistic in your views. If you think that Netflix is doing this to be assholes just realize that not everyone is like you.

    103. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      "In order to provide a better service to you, our valued customer...", immediately I recoil, 'cause I know I'm just about to be hit with some sort of diminished service.
      Come on, that's a sweeping generalisation.

      They might just be going to charge you more.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    104. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by rocketPack · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what compelled me to find this feature (and utilize it) in the first place! Dividing up the queue is a pain, but do-able. Dividing up the recommendations is impossible though!

      Like others have said: I'm going to Blockbuster if they implement this change.

    105. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "rent, rip, and return the next day."

      I really don't understand this mentality. Blank DVDs aren't free, and Netflix is so very inexpensive, and very few people over the age of six actually watch a movie more than two or three times.

      It is CHEAPER, if you use netflix, not to rip at all. Just buy the few movies you actually want to watch again. AND you get them with all the pretty packaging for your bookshelf.

      Not to mention that it doesn't make sense to buy any DVDs at all at the moment, since the DVD successor is already on the market, and therefore only a few years away from price-parity.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    106. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from a pure consumer standpoint, this change makes no difference.

      What?

      We have a 3-at-a-time service, for $17. Splitting that into a 2-at-a-time and a 1-at-a-time costs $14 + $9, or $23. $6 extra per month for the same service we have now is "no difference"??
    107. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by brucifer · · Score: 1

      Thank you for posting these. I was just in the process of trying to track down some sort of contact information.

      Hopefully people can limit their emails to constructive and well worded criticism of this plan and not flame.

    108. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by CottonThePirate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's more like now. When I was young I got a hot meal on a flight, even one that was 2 hours long, in economy class!

    109. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks to be you.

      I put my returns in my mailbox in the morning. The postman picks them up around 2 o'clock and takes them to the post office. They arrive at the local shipping center, 100 miles away, the next day.

    110. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Keyslapper · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, for those unsure how to begin, please feel free to take this (under the free as in air license) and modify it to fit your taste:

      Dear Netflix Team,

      I am writing to acknowledge an email I received regarding recent changes in Netflix service. Specifically, the fact that profiles will soon be eliminated from Netflix services.

      I would like to express my dissatisfaction at this decision. As a software developer, I realize that maintaining special services are often more costly than they would appear to those enjoying them, and I don't presume to know the efforts behind the excellent service my family and I have been receiving from Netflix thus far.

      However, I would like it to be known that the profile feature was the single most important deciding factor in my decision to become a Netflix customer. The ability for different members of my family to control the flow and content of their own queues is invaluable. The loss of this feature will very likely affect my decision to remain with Netflix. It is my sincere hope that this decision might be re-evaluated.

      Best regards,

      Etc.

    111. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be a single billing statement? Convenience. 1 bill to pay rather than 2. 1 less check to write or 1 less online bill to pay. OK, let's assume auto-bill pay.

      This is a really vapid argument because we're talking about a credit card number. You already have only one bill to pay (the credit card bill) or zero bills to pay (it comes out of your checking account via debit card.)

      Do you save money if you have a single statement? I get paper statements, so actually it does. It saves the company less in postage and paperwork so their costs are slightly less. And 1 less stamp for me to mail them a paper check (I'm archaic).

      In other words, you're hanging on to a ridiculous model that harms everyone (as computers become more efficient, the internet becomes more efficient, and trends in electronics are towards smaller size and lower power consumption per operation, but paper is pretty much paper and the USPS or their contractor still delivers it in an extremely inefficient internal combustion engine-powered vehicle) instead of getting with the program. Congratulations!

      Also, fewer statements to archive in the filing cabinet. I file *everything*, that's why I like paper statements, and I know I've got access to them long after my account is deactivated.

      I use gmail plus a backup (I am not concerned if the FBI knows how much my phone bill is.) I trust gmail to be around (if not private) and it would be incredibly difficult for me to tamper with so it provides a trail. You could also cryptographically sign records, if you wanted to establish a date; a cryptographic signature is legally equivalent to one written on paper with a pen, at least in the USA (federally.)

      I understand if you want to stick with paper (although I do not agree with you) and of course, it is your decision to boycott people if they don't do business the way you want to do business. On the other hand, you've got an antiquarian mentality that fails to embrace the present, let alone the future - at least in this area. It will only cost you time and effort. Again, it's your prerogative, but acting incensed when someone wants to do business more intelligently than you is less than compelling.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    112. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Keyslapper · · Score: 1, Informative

      So true.

      I'm in the same boat mostly, but our daughter uses the third queue. The thing I don't get is what the focus is. Are they pulling something out of their hats that really will seem better, or are they just reducing costs?

      The thing is, if they were to look at it from a profit standpoint, they could actually do this in a much more intelligent way.

      For instance: just charge $0.50 per additional queue per month. This way, they're getting tens of thousands of dollars (maybe more maybe less, but certainly enough) to put toward maintaining this feature, and nobody who just has one queue has to subsidize those with 2 or more. And those who do use profiles will be less likely to add them willy-nilly just because the guy next door wants one.

      Personally, I'd happily pay an extra buck a month for the convenience of a couple extra queues. And I'm a cheapskate.

      Cheers

    113. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Get a life: Go outside.

    114. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Thuktun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they should do it. They are in business to make money, it's not the public library. You're right. They are entitled to shoot themselves in the collective foot by driving customers away. It's a free market, after all.
    115. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by hazem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd imagine a substantial portion of their customers will now pay for two accounts.

      Well, here's a customer who just changed to paying for no accounts. I'll just go back to getting movies from the library.

    116. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Quikah · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can watch the rip without burning it to DVD.

      --
      Q.
    117. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have had 0% success with getting DVDs from the library. The failures fall into one of two classes:

      1. All the available movies suck. Everything watchable has been borrowed and all that's left are the Ishtar DVDs patrons donated after watching them once

      2. The DVD is damaged. Generally people aren't very careful with Library materials and I have yet to rent a DVD (my two-year-old daughter is much less discriminating about what she watches) that plays all the way through. Usually they're scratched so badly that there's a point on the DVD where it hangs the player.

      The library isn't a good solution if you actuallly want to WATCH worthwhile videos

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    118. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't mistake vocal complaints on Slashdot with the popularity of an opinion/software feature/anything at all.

      It's a terrible mistake, because the people around here are weird. Deliberately so, it seems.

      Not that I have an opinion about this particular story myself, just wanted to point that out.

    119. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by RoverDaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've used Redbox a number of times and I'm very happy with it. Much more cost effective for somebody who only rents a couple movies a month. The only problem with Redbox is they're space limited (of course) so they only provide new releases. If you want something from 6 months ago forget it.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    120. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      This is a really vapid argument because we're talking about a credit card number. You already have only one bill to pay (the credit card bill) or zero bills to pay (it comes out of your checking account via debit card.)
      It's not a vapid argument if the account isn't automatically charged to the card. You asked general questions. I gave general answers. Also, you didn't address the bit about it generating extra useless transactions on my credit card statement. Even if it's not an issue for you, it's an issue for me and thus it becomes part of my reasoning. We're talking opinions and behavior here, not science.

      In other words, you're hanging on to a ridiculous model that harms everyone (as computers become more efficient, the internet becomes more efficient, and trends in electronics are towards smaller size and lower power consumption per operation, but paper is pretty much paper and the USPS or their contractor still delivers it in an extremely inefficient internal combustion engine-powered vehicle) instead of getting with the program. Congratulations!
      When industry can get billing statements right every time, I will rely on electronic billing and online bill payments. Until then, I defer to paper printed on their corporate stationary.

      If we're going to cast aspersions about character flaws, then I'll tell you you're being naive placing your faith in corporations who have little incentive to maintain accurate records.

      The reason is they can always claim I forged the email and there is no ubiquitous channel for them to request a guaranteed-to-be-unmodified copy of an email from gmail, other than a court subpoena, which they have no motive to do. If the provider doesn't sign the email before sending it to you, then that forces you to sign them--that's work. Also, the billing corporation will not trust your signature, therefore forcing you to go to court to resolve billing issues. If you know of a way to automatically have gmail sign incoming messages, then that's great, but you still have to convince the provider to honor it. No guarantee.

      Not all providers email statements. Some host them on their servers. They can always alter statements hosted on their website. With those I have no recourse should they decide to double bill me or add an extra 0 on a line item.

      There is still a large amount of trust with paper documents. I can't say why this is so, but it's just how it is. I know if I walk into a bank with paper documents proving my case, my word will carry more weight than had I walked in with a CD containing emails. Given that, I still do online payment whenever possible thus eliminating a chunk of the paper correspondence, but for those cases the record of payment is with my credit card--a 3rd party.

      If you're going to argue the merits of paper consumption, then LEGALIZE HEMP PAPER. It has a much longer recycle capability and requires fewer chemicals to recycle it. It's also harvested from a fast growing plant which can repopulate quicker than trees.

      On the other hand, you've got an antiquarian mentality that fails to embrace the present, let alone the future - at least in this area. It will only cost you time and effort.
      You haven't completely considered the risks of all your statements resting in the hands of your service provider, where they're stored in a highly dynamic medium. My mentality hasn't cost me anything, really. Other than purchasing a file cabinet.

      Again, it's your prerogative, but acting incensed when someone wants to do business more intelligently than you is less than compelling.
      Don't project your moods on me. I'm not incensed at all. I only described my method..

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    121. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and lord knows she deserves that entertainment for free, because... um... I don't know. But she sure deserves it.

    122. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I guess calling a spade a spade will always be considered hateful by some people.


      No, saying you hate someone for something so ridiculous will do that.

      As is, it reads more like some underhanded way of getting people to pay more money for the same things.


      No, getting the movies still works, which is the primary function. Managing the queue is strictly support for the primary function. Nobody pays Netflix for their queue management, you know.

      I know that the Slashdot ethos is something like "I deserve whatever I want at whatever price I feel like paying, even if that means I want everything for nothing" but that's just not how it works in the real world.

    123. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by jdavidb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is expected that both sides will act rationally. Customers will make the most out of their money, and NetFlix will cut features that cost them money. Calling their customers deadbeats is idiotic.

      Given all of that, why are you calling Netflix "sleazy"? Is it only idiotic to speak of someone in a derogatory way for acting in their own self interest when they are a customer, but perfectly fine if they are running a business?

    124. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by residieu · · Score: 1

      Removing the olive from my salad IS providing better service. What do I want with an olive in my salad? ewww. Don't touch my tomatoes, though. I don't care what they're infected with, I'm eating them.

    125. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best we could manage was to suck on a piece of damp cloth.

    126. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that maybe netflix is having issues keeping with the volume of discs they currently are mailing and getting returned? It's VERY possible that the simple volume means they have a queue of incoming mail that takes 2 days to sort out. If you're not happy with it, think about how our family, on a 3 at a time plan, get "throttled"... We keep discs for a few weeks at a time. And it ALWAYS takes 3-5 days to get the next disc in. Boo netflix! I think the real problem, like I said, is the sheer volume. They probably didn't anticipate quite the level of growth they got.

      --
      ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    127. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you forked your OS project because you didn't like tabs in your source files.

    128. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As demonstrated elsewhere in the thread, one does not save money by having many-disks on one account.

    129. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Average · · Score: 1

      Some are just digital packrats. Some get far more out of their Netflix subscription that way (i.e., they have hours and hours to watch things, but only on two days a month). And, while I agree on movies (I know plenty of people who re-watch movies, but I can't stand to), DVDs are more than movies. TV series, Anime, and particularly music/concert vids have much higher rewatchability (to me).

    130. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Greg_D · · Score: 1

      At least you had hands. If we could afford dreams we would have dreamt of having hands. We had to carry the sand in our orifices. Do you know how uncomfortable it is to carry 20 pounds of wet sand in your bowels? We would, if we could afford knowledge.

    131. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      You could always switch to Blockbuster. It seems with the volume you're doing, Netflix would be happy for you to make the switch.

      /can't stand when people complain about $15/month services

    132. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by kingbilly · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the email addresses, I put them to good use.

      Hello, I am writing to send you my feedback about your announced removal of the profile feature. This feature made it possible for me to upgrade my plan to three discs out at a time, while allowing my family members to take care of adding movies to the queue. The separate profiles allow allowed me to keep important account credentials in my hands only. We will be canceling our subscription tonight. I hope that this feature one day returns. Until then I have no choice but to use my dollar votes and rent from the local video store. Regards, Richard

    133. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because you are an idiot.

    134. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, no, we cannot just continue using the 3 at-a-time plan. May I ask why not? Thank you for being cordial with me. I started writing a reply; but, after an hour of working on it, I decided to delete all of it. I don't have the time to fully respond to you in the respectful, well thought-out manner that you deserve. (That includes enough details so that you have a reasonable chance of seeing my situation.) That's life when it comes to conversing with strangers.
    135. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by jnana · · Score: 1

      There will also be a big spike in memberships as a result, which is always good on paper at least.

      Next year's marketing will be touting their amazing 20% increase in memberships last year as a result of their outstanding customer satisfaction.

    136. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reed is now at reed.hastings@netflix.com

    137. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Head. 'sploded!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    138. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by wizzy403 · · Score: 1

      Here are some more email addresses:

      nhunt@netflix.com, Neil Hunt, Chief Product Officer
      bmccarthy@netflix.com, Barry McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer
      pmccord@netflix.com, Patty McCord, Chief Talent Officer
      tsarandos@netflix.com, Ted Sarandos, Chief Content Officer

    139. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by wizzy403 · · Score: 1

      Neil's email has also changed to the new format of first.last.

      neil.hunt@netflix.com

    140. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went further. I placed my NF account "on hold" today and set the resume date for just after the first of September. Then I emailed the contacts provided above and told them that if they get rid of profiles as scheduled, they get rid of me too.

    141. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by jnana · · Score: 1

      Oops, I could have sworn that this was a reply to the grandparent post and not the parent post.

    142. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Tabernaque86 · · Score: 1

      People who say things like, "Well, obviously, company $x is a business, so they can do whatever they want" or "Your boss pays you money to work, so you have to do whatever he says"are invariably idiots

      I disagree. I see nothing idiotic about those statements.

      Provided the company isn't doing anything illegal, they very can well do anything they want. If you disagree with what they do, then stop doing business with them. If enough people stop doing business with them, they'll realize their mistakes and hopefully fix things.

      Same goes for an employer. Don't agree with the work they're giving you? Quit and find a new job. Wait for others to follow.
    143. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Keyslapper · · Score: 1

      At the very least, I'll be dropping my service, but in all likelihood, I'll be dropping it. You'd think I'd preview myself more carefully ...

      Naturally, I meant to say:

      At the very least, I'll be reducing my service, ... Cheers
    144. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how on earth it can be more efficent for them. All profiles should amount to is one table in a database. So you end up with an Accounts table as the parent for the Profiles table, and Profiles the parent for Queues, Rental History, Ratings, etc, and recommendations are calculations based of Rental History and Ratings. All that removing the Profiles table will give them, is one less link in the chain, which, in a properly normalized database, shouldn't mean diddly squat in terms of efficiency or cost savings.

    145. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      I don't have the time to fully respond to you in the respectful, well thought-out manner that you deserve.

      I completely understand... and relate. =)

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    146. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by operagost · · Score: 1

      The "get off my lawn" stuff has a sad irony in this context, as air travelers in the 20th century were treated like royalty compared to today.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    147. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      How the heck do you watch 6 discs at a time? Man, I've had the same three set of movies for about 3 or 4 months now and I just don't have time to watch them yet. I'm glad I don't have to worry about penalties though.

    148. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. I hope we don't look back in 5 years on uncapped DSL or the ability to record TV shows for later viewing the same way.

    149. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      their business problems are not MY problems.

      if they are growing too fast, well, that's a GOOD problem to have! and a good reason to HIRE more people.

      how much you wanna bet they are not expanding resources to meet the need? ie, they are overselling just like an ISP does when they oversell their network pipes.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    150. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I was on a higher tier than the $15/mo plan.

      and I don't feel one bit of guilt for USING the service I PAID FOR.

      its like the isp's trying to make you feel like a bad guy for USING your dsl/cable bandwidth. no one forced them to create an 'unlimited' dvd service. all I'm asking is that they HONESTLY HONOR THEIR PROMISES. I pay on time - I keep MY end of the promise. but they are clearly not keeping their side of the promise.

      maybe we should all pay late. yeah, that's it. our 'center' was too busy today; so I decided to write your check TOMORROW.

      (that should go over well. but do you see my point?)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    151. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I don't see your point. If you don't agree with their terms of service, DON'T USE THEM. Works with Netflix, DSL, Cable, or any other service out there.

    152. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have replied AC, then you could have linked back to this comment in five years when your predictions are reality.

      --
      ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    153. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the second of 6, I don't remember ever having such a conversation that went beyond the third line.

      At least not without the resounding echo of a very wide belt slapping the backside of a pair of jeans ...
      And well deserved, too. Talk about the height of snottiness.

      Damn, I'm glad my kids didn't inherit the "revenge" gene.

    154. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I always make myself watch at least one a week. Some weeks I'll watch more (two or all three), but I always watch and return *at least* one title a week. Otherwise, I'm not getting my money's worth out of the three-out-at-once plan. If you're not watching at least one a week, you had might as well downgrade your Netflix to one of the cheaper plans, or start renting titles individually from a local video store (4 titles a month at Netflix is about $4-$5 a pop for the rentals, or about what you would pay at a video store).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    155. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by lgw · · Score: 1

      I have Netflix instead of cable. The only TV I watch (beyond the news) is TV shows on DVDs from Netflix. I get good use of my 5-at-a-time plan every week, as I'll watch 5-6 hours of TV during the weekend and maybe an hour a night during the week, mostly while cleaning, working out, etc.

      It's vastly cheaper than cable in my area, and there's always something good on.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    156. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by fropenn · · Score: 1

      In my region (Plains states) they posted a notice that the shipping center in Iowa is temporarily closed due to the flooding and that this may impact my shipping experience. While this is certainly not related to your experience in California, there could be something similar impacting shipping in your region (locusts, fires, etc.).

      Who says natural disasters don't effect us all? I have to wait an extra day to get "Meatballs II."

    157. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Zen · · Score: 1

      All right - your point is the same as dozens if not hundreds of other people here. I have a completely honest (non troll) question. I've been thinking about signing up for netflix for a long time, but haven't gotten around to it yet.

      I've never heard of profiles before. I don't really understand how they add value other than simple separation. If you have three queues (yours/spouse/kids), and the kids hang on to something for a while nobody else suffers. I don't see how that would change if there was only one queue. You'd have the same number of DVD's out at a time, you send back two but your kids hang onto their movie. You then get your next two movies and the kids still have the one they wanted. Nobody loses anything. What am I missing? I was under the impression that you can reorder your requests on the fly, so all you do is just set the kids movies to be one every three or five in your request list or whatever you want your interval to be, and you're all set.

      As for recommendations, I don't really understand that difference either. It's all one account - people in your house have a myriad of tastes. So why isn't taking all those into account all at the same time a valid way to do it? Then you'll end up with movies that one or the other person likes, or even better, something that melds multiple types together.

    158. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Zerimar · · Score: 1

      I'm an existing user and I'd be GLAD to play $1.00 per additional profile to keep the feature. It's either that or drop Netflix - I let them know.

    159. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      I can't hate people who say stupid things? Yeah, that makes sense.

      The rest of your post is directly contradicted by other people in this discussion who have said that their primary reason for choosing NetFlix was queue management, and by the simple observation that you've now started attacking straw men. "I deserve whatever I want at whatever price I feel like paying"? Way to end any serious discussion. That's even more idiotic than the guy above.

    160. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. People who justify everything a company does with "they're trying to make money" are at best simpletons, and at worst total jerks.

      Everything anyone does is because they want something. I'm a business (both theoretically in that a person is a business of one, and actually) and while my ultimate goal is to make money it would be ridiculous of someone to state it. I mean - duh... of course I want to make money. But that doesn't justify me thumping you on the head and taking your money, so why bother mentioning it?

      I'm only hitting you because I don't like you - but it's okay because I've got a reason...

    161. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by sasdrtx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bullshit. The system is *already there*. It's been running for years. I can't figure out the real story on this, but fucking your customers to make life a little easier on your IT staff just doesn't fly in my universe.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    162. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logging in and moving one of my movies to the top of the queue so that I get one back instead of my wife is *not* convenient. Might as well just go back to driving to the friggin' movie store.
      Call me old-fashioned, but I wouldn't call something you can do in fifteen seconds while naked "inconvenient". It takes more effort to put the return envelope in the mail.

      Kids today.
    163. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I am the only person using my netflix account, and I use profiles. I have one for movies, and one for TV shows (e.g. season set collections).

      Part of it is because I had filled up my main profile (yes, I know I should get rid of 99% of the movies I'll never watch), but then I really got used to doing it that way.
      It's easier to manage this way.

      I think it's a big step backward, and will let netflix know about it. I have been a customer for a very long time, and am grandfathered into the 4 at a time plan.. Also, since I'm on a Mac, I don't get to take advantage of the streaming (if they gave me a free Roku device, that would be sufficient). I almost certainly won't totally
      cancel netflix, but I will very strongly consider going to a lower level plan, since I already Tivo tons and tons of stuff..

    164. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Well, they did build a whole bunch of separate distribution centers (rather than just having the one in Los Gatos).

      Perhaps they're sending you the one at the top of your list, making you wait a day, rather than sending you a lower priority one NOW?

    165. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hate"? For typing some innocuous things on the internet? Dude, you need to step away from the keyboard and take a walk outside.

    166. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by bradt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure that it will make NetFlix change their mind, but an online petition has been started at http://www.savenetflixprofiles.com/

    167. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, stop your whining! My nearest NF distribution center is about 150 miles away. If I drop a disc at the post office on Monday evening, I'm lucky if it shows up as received by Thursday. Then when a movie is shipped, it doesn't arrive until at least two days later. My average turnaround time is about 7 days. And, no, I don't think I'm being throttled because I often hold onto movies for 3-5 days before returning them. They call it their "fairness algorithm", because it provides smug city dwellers like yourself with the same service for your money as us country folk.

    168. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      their business problems are not MY problems. Cripes, man, no one claimed it was your problem--- they're just disputing your assertion that a 24hr+ delay between receipt and mailout is intentional throttling.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    169. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Batlord · · Score: 1

      Two words: Sweeny Todd

    170. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is simply not true. Originally, you could get around this by not returning as quickly, or leaving your queue empty up until the last minute, or changing your account, or switching your credit card or something. They penalize frequent returners because it costs them money.

    171. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

      The reason he's annoyed is those comments are incendiary. You create a false dilemma (America love it or leave it) that makes your only choices to choose nothing or something they don't want and tell the person to get stuffed. The whole point is that those options suck and consumers are upset and they have every right to complain. That's the way the market place is supposed to work. If you don't like the way we do things here, you're free to move to Russia.

      And a business can't do anything it wants to if there's a financial incentive to. Otherwise they'd be pimpin'.

    172. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

      Well, I understand the upset with the lack of queue profiles, but having to keep track of 5-star ratings and recommendations for each individual profile seems like asking too much, unless those evaluations lead to some revenue, but I guess they don't.

    173. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

      Also, to improve your experience, we're getting rid of the New Suggestions too.

    174. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their business problems are not MY problems

      Apparently whining is *your* problem. I have not read such a childish post in years. No understanding of how websites work, apparently.

    175. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by icsx · · Score: 1

      No cost savings, just more money from advertisers because now they can direct adds better and show stuff that adults would not show to their kids.

    176. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by orasio · · Score: 1

      No way. Five years from now, slashdot will be owned by Disney, and hotlinking to their sites will be against the law everywhere in the world, but North Korea. Or what will be left from it.

    177. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Don't touch my tomatoes, though. I don't care what they're infected with, I'm eating them. I like it, I like it. I just wish my tomato-hating boyfriend agreed with you. :(
    178. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I need to receive paper statements since my employer reimbursed me for DSL costs (I'm on call and expected to log in from home to fix things). They don't accept emailed transactions, only original bills (no photocopies).

    179. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by triso · · Score: 1

      Whenever the bank, phone company or any other large corporation sends me a form letter that begins along the lines of "In order to provide a better service to you, our valued customer...", immediately I recoil, 'cause I know I'm just about to be hit with some sort of diminished service.
      [../] Of course that is followed by another recoil as you realize that it is now going to cost more to keep the level of service you had before.

    180. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Netflix operates on razor thin margins Where do you get this from? I did some quick searching, and they are consistently above 30%.
    181. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      "As for 'dead-beat customers that cost them more than they make', that does not make someone a dead beat. That makes them thrifty."

      This is America! We believe in Capitalism! That means that corporations should be thrify and people should be good (ie profligate) consumers!

      Suggesting consumers should be thrifty, pshaw! What are you, some kind of Commie?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    182. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Taking John Cleese, Peter Cook et al (circa 1964) to a whole new level, that's just about as audaciously geek-deep as one can get, and graces the human race with additional redemption points, I congratulate you, sir, on behalf of the rest of us.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    183. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dido to the RedBox idea, I canceled my account Friday as my pay cycle was coming up. I even told they guy on the phone I would comeback if they brought back the separate profiles / queues. They already has the software in place, seems odd they would remove the feature at an additional IT cost. Just beware of bugs in the new system continued users!

    184. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Why yes! I see by the news accounts that there has been a ground-swell and NetFlix has announced bankruptcy...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    185. Re:Yes, I received the same notice. by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      You're right. They are entitled to shoot themselves in the collective foot by driving customers away. It's a free market, after all. Why yes! I see by the news accounts that there has been a ground-swell and NetFlix has announced bankruptcy... Since shooting one's self in the foot regularly results in death. Huh?

      There's a continuum between fatal self-injury and no damage whatsoever. Feel free to jump to the far extreme.

  2. Probably a bug. by AltGrendel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would guess that it isn't working properly from their standpoint making it a PITA to maintain and deal with.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Probably a bug. by websaber · · Score: 1

      Or more likely they realized that people are sharing accounts. The best part is they can't come up with a reason why, they are trying to maximize revenue at the expense of their customer base.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    2. Re:Probably a bug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Chuck Willis of Mandiant made fools of them by using them as an example of a high profile site which is inherently vulnerable to perfectly simple cross site request forgery attacks by design, back at Blackhat Federal DC 2008, could it?

      http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-dc-08/bh-dc-08-speakers.html#Willis

  3. Not a good sign by Monoman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Based on the information coming out on this it doesn't look good. Did they research how much this would piss off the current customers? It is coming off like they don't care. Perhaps the profile feature is causing bigger problems behind the scenes. If it is the later then they should find better programmers to work around the problem(s).

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re:Not a good sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pretty sure Netflix CEO Reed Hastings knew this would go over badly.

      He exercised 2,500 options and then sold off 10,000 shares just last week.

      See: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/06/13/ap5115170.html

    2. Re:Not a good sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not good programming if you have to work around the problems; I would imagine, due to bad design, that the code base for the profiles have became too hard to work with, and besides sinking large resources and costs, which will be passed onto the customer, they are scraping the code. Maybe, later on, they have plans to re-implement the code; just right now it is not financially feasible.

      The question you should be asking yourself, do you want to pay higher rates, or would you rather the current cost sans one feature?

    3. Re:Not a good sign by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      why do they CARE about pissing off current customers?

      where are you going to go? there are NOT many other choices (some would say there are NO other valid choices).

      they know this. so they're fucking with us as much as they possibly can.

      I wish there was real competition. but there just isn't.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Not a good sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are good that they don't ever think about their customers.

      Really? Think before you write this shit. If you ever worked at a company like Netflix before you would understand that sometimes there are painful choices to be made wrt product changes. Of course you calculate the risks and the upside potential. If Netflix thought that the customer base would flee from these changes, they would likely not make them. Or, maybe they're pushed into dropping this feature for some other reason. But most of the time the reasons can't/won't be discussed publicly because it is a PITA to have your customers have too much control over product decisions.

    5. Re:Not a good sign by random256 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that insider trading? Shouldn't we be reporting him to the SEC? Correct me if I'm wrong.

    6. Re:Not a good sign by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? Blockbuster Online has a virtually identical service, with a virtually identical selection of movies and a virtually identical featureset. You might not like Blockbuster as a company, but to say there's not "real competition" is ridiculous.

    7. Re:Not a good sign by PLBogen · · Score: 5, Informative

      I called NetFlix and they informed me that it was a technical issue. The programmer's new upcoming features apparently are buggy when interacting with accounts with multiple profiles and instead of fixing the bugs, the programmers decided to axes profiles.

    8. Re:Not a good sign by residieu · · Score: 1

      And there's always going to the store to rent yourself, or Movies on Demand through your Cable/Satellite provider. They're not the same thing, and may be more expensive/less conveniant, but if the NetFlix service loses too much of its value they're still viable options.

    9. Re:Not a good sign by spicyjeff · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It was a pre-arranged trading plan so the timing in immaterial.

    10. Re:Not a good sign by Beefpatrol · · Score: 1

      I've been curious about the direct streaming feature. On the website, it says XP or Vista is required with certain service packs, etc. What format do they use for this and is Windows really necessary? Requiring Windows is sure to irritate customers as well.

    11. Re:Not a good sign by eeek · · Score: 1

      I called NetFlix and they informed me that it was a technical issue. The programmer's new upcoming features apparently are buggy when interacting with accounts with multiple profiles and instead of fixing the bugs, the programmers decided to axes profiles. So they aren't above lying to customers. No surprise there.

    12. Re:Not a good sign by abegosum · · Score: 1

      I recommend that we all write and let them know that we're pissed off:

      http://www.netflix.com/Suggest?type=2&lnkctr=cu_suggest

      If it's a tiny percentage that use this feature, as they claim, this won't be a nuisance. If they are lying and simply want people who use seperate queues to fork over extra for new accounts, well, then they'll be getting a lot of e-mail.

      Here's what I sent them:

      To Whom it May Concern:

      I've just recently read that you will soon be discontinuing your multiple profiles feature for Netflix.

      I have to say, first of all, that many of my friends who use Netflix chose the service because they could easily share it with their families in a manageable way (multiple queues). This feature sets Netflix apart from other online rental services that don't do the same. In essence it differentiates your business and thusly attracts customers who otherwise might go elsewhere.

      I think that removing this feature is a grave mistake and will significantly hinder the attractiveness of the service to myself and others. In fact, after September, I may consider moving to another service. I hate to say so, but I feel that removing this feature simply shows that Netflix isn't listening to its customers. Many already venting their frustration at popular websites: http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/06/19/0337233.shtml. To quote one commenter: "Did they research how much this would piss off the current customers? It is coming off like they don't care."

      I understand that this feature requires additional maintenance on the part of programmers; but, any feature that attracts people to one site versus another would require this effort. I'm hoping that this isn't a business push to try and get families to break their queues into separate accounts as a way to squeeze extra money from the customers, but without any justification for this move (other than "to better serve our customers"), I can only speculate that the decision has been made to drive up the bottom line at the cost of current members.

      Obviously, at some point a decision has been made, and there may be little that can be done to change it. Nevertheless, if come September my account will only support one queue, I will most likely take my business elsewhere.

      Sincerely,
      ~[name hidden to protect the innocent]

    13. Re:Not a good sign by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      You are probably right, but this isn't evidence. It sounds to me like they told him more or less the same thing as their announcement said.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    14. Re:Not a good sign by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      I thought Blockbuster had the reputation of editing out objectionable material (sex, religious references or "bad words") from the movies it rented. Or did they stop doing this?

      If they are still editing, then their service would not be identical to NetFlix.

    15. Re:Not a good sign by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      They've never done it on Blockbuster Online.

      In fact, I've never heard of them doing this in brick and mortars-- Wal-Mart has, but Blockbuster? That's a new one for me.

  4. I'm not sure how it improves things... by Inari · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My family uses it and its only been a positive. I'm betting a bean counter marketing type suggested that it might force me to get separate accounts if I couldnt use the separate queues.

    1. Re:I'm not sure how it improves things... by ArieKremen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We are using this feature to manage two queues: one for our kids and one for the adults. It has been a great feature. Before it was introduced we have to continually micromanage the queue, hold on to disks to 'work' the systems (postal and Netflix), and suffered the occasional disappointments.

      The profiles allowed us more flexibility and better service. I think that Netflix is trying to increase revenue without increasing their monthly fees. Downgrading our plan and subscribing to another minimal would cost us at least $2.00/month. It is definitely a hidden cost increase.

      Has anyone here had experience with the Blockbuster service? Does it support queues and how is their selection?

      --
      -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
    2. Re:I'm not sure how it improves things... by Invalidator · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yet another example of market-speak corrupting the language. But, blame belongs with the Nazis - they started it: the sign at Auschwitz read "Arbeit macht frei."

      --

      ~_~ Not tonight, dear, I have a modem.

    3. Re:I'm not sure how it improves things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the B'buster service, then again, I live across the street from a B'buster store. No sub-queues, but the selection is far better than in the store.

  5. You Can't Transfer Your Profile Data Either by Immerial · · Score: 1

    It says that you can't transfer your profile data to another account (from their FAQ). It's like they don't want customers! I expect them to lose a lot of customers over this. Glad I don't own any of their stock... it's gonna tank.

  6. Bad Move by bullet618 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think they're trying to get people to pay for more than one account. I don't know what features they could be adding that would warrant dropping sub accounts. I have a funny feeling this is going to backfire and they'll lose more people than they gain.

    1. Re:Bad Move by psy · · Score: 1

      They are definitely making people try and pay for more than one account.

      It's working too well, too efficiently and they are losing money on it.

    2. Re:Bad Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they will lose anyone. I also doubt the assumption that people will sign up for multitple accounts. There has to be some other reason not apparent to the end user.

    3. Re:Bad Move by Ydna · · Score: 1

      If they want me to create more (paying) accounts, then they should have provided a migration path other than printing out my sub-account queue and manually re-entering the selections into a new account.

      --

      "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

  7. This has been a life-saver by Diomedes01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has been a life-saver for me; rather than having to remember what movies my wife wants to see, and having my movies held up when she takes a week to watch one, I can set her up with her on mini-queue and then not have to worry about it. What Netflix fails to realize is that there is no way in hell I will pay for a separate account for this, and I doubt many other people will, either. I was fairly upset when I got the email, and am considering looking at the Blockbuster service, since I can also use it locally... anyone know if Blockbuster provides something similar to the Profile feature?

    --
    "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    1. Re:This has been a life-saver by Andraax · · Score: 1

      No, they don't have a profile feature, but with Blockbuster you can take a mailed movie into the store and get a movie out of the store to watch instantly. The store then mails your movie back to Blockbuster for you. In essence, you get double the number of movies that you sign up for - if you have a "three at a time" plan, you can return those three at a store and get another three from the store immediately, then you get another three in the mail a day or two later.

    2. Re:This has been a life-saver by frission · · Score: 1

      There is a limit to this though. It used to be unlimited and you could do what you describe, now you can only do it 5 times per month.

    3. Re:This has been a life-saver by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1

      I may end up switching to Blockbuster, then - because that way, my wife could just take one of my mailed-in movies to the Blockbuster 5 minutes down the road and pick whatever movie she wants, and then I get my next queued movie in the mail without having to do anything at all; if she doesn't want to rent anything, I just mail it back directly. I hate to lose all my ratings and recommendations, which is something I really like about Netflix, but trying to manage one queue for people with completely different tastes and viewing habits is a nightmare. Thanks for the info!

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    4. Re:This has been a life-saver by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      My wife and I still have unlimited, I'm not sure if we're just grandfathered in or what, but I think we pay a dollar or two more than the normal 2 at a time account any way. There may still be a way to get it. If you watch a LOT it's worth looking into.

  8. High Maintainence User by Aphoxema · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I canceled my NetFlix account because they never responded to me when I asked 3 times if they would ever have a way to view their streaming thing in GNU/Linux or at least Firefox instead of being forced to use Internet Explorer.

    Not a bad idea, mailing DVD's back and forth (the US postal service has to get SOME use now with the internet taking over), and the price wasn't something to cause any hesitation, I just couldn't stand getting ignored.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    1. Re:High Maintainence User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're trying to convince everyone you're a sock puppet for Twitter, you're doing a good job.

    2. Re:High Maintainence User by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I don't even know what Twitter is

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    3. Re:High Maintainence User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very clever, Twitter, trying to throw us off your trail like that.

  9. Netflix is losing a customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very lame. I got the same e-mail and it pisses me off. The profiles feature is what made my wife and I decide to try Netflix over Blockbuster Online. We have 3 out at once, I get my own queue, she gets her own queue, and then we have a queue of things we both want to see. Trying to maintain a single queue so things come to us the same way will be a nightmare, we will probably cancel our Netflix account, it just isn't worth the hassle anymore. We've had no problems with the profile system, it seems to me that canceling it just lets their web developers be lazy little babies.

  10. Obligatory by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I tagged the article "1984" and "bigbrother" because 90% of the idiots here will see the word "profile" and jump to the same conclusion.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for being one of the 90%.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for being on of the other 90%, spaztard.

    3. Re:Obligatory by Gewalt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow, so you decided that because "you" were dead wrong on something that 90% of the populous here would be at least as stupid as you and make the same mistake?

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    4. Re:Obligatory by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Troll

      So, which part of Germany are you from?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Obligatory by Gewalt · · Score: 1

      Virginia

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    6. Re:Obligatory by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Then how come you can't read or write English properly, and wouldn't recognise irony if it bit you?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Obligatory by Gewalt · · Score: 1

      I can and I did, and I will whenever it exists. Does that answer all your questions? Or are you going to continue this charade some more? Do you need a link to the definition of irony? 'cause clearly, you do no know what it means.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
  11. contact Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're as unhappy as this "improvement" in service as I am, then click on Contact Us button in Netflix and let them know that you will be looking to change to a competitor. A few zillion such complaints may cause them to reconsider.

    1. Re:contact Netflix by Jaegar · · Score: 1

      Their customer service number is 1-888-638-3549. The only recourse is to call and complain, I guess.

    2. Re:contact Netflix by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      I called and expressed my displeasure. It seemed like they had gotten MANY calls and e-mails, and may be re-considering this change. Here's the first entry in the Netflix Community Blog:

      Thursday, June 19, 2008 Profiles feature going away
      As a Netflix product manager I'm tasked with the wonderful job of helping members find movies they'll love. But today my job is more challenging as we've decided to terminate the profiles feature on September 1. Please know that the motivation is solely driven by keeping our service as simple and as easy to use as possible. Too many members found the feature difficult to understand and cumbersome, having to consistently log in and out of the website.

      Continuing to maintain the profiles feature for the passionate few who use it (including myself) distracts us from the mission of presenting to all our members the easiest way to find the best titles for them from the 100k plus on DVD and the 10k plus available instantly.

      We will do our best to find better ways for families to share accounts than the existing profiles feature and will continue to invest in improving the website experience in many different ways.

      - Todd

  12. Re:oh noes! by oodaloop · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Between this and the FCC not releasing how it classified broadband penetration, it's enough to drive me to drink.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  13. Someone will greasemonkey it. by FirstNoel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd give it a week and some skilled firefox hacker will create some addon to put it back in from the user side.

    Sean D.

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    1. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by Sleepy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only part of 'profile' that matters is the separate queues. That will be gone... web GUI tricks won't affect the Netflix shipping department.

      I DON'T think Netflix would have done this if Walmart was still alive in their DVD rental business.

      Last I checked Blockbuster's online store worked poorly in FireFox... and if the stores are any indication, probably all of their movies default to "full screen" (pan and scan).

      My favorite is GreenCine.com... but they only ship from the west coast, and movie turnover is VERY slow.

    2. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was my immediate thought. I have a handful of Greasemonkey scripts, and when I saw this article I wondered what it would take to re-create the feature. To do it right, you'd need a central server of your own that Greasemonkey could use to store which items were flagged as yours. Then you'd need to provide some kind of labeling feature to the page ("10 of the movies on this list are for me, 30 are for my spouse, and 20 are for my kids"), and finally a "rebalance" option that would take the single queue and intersperse your items with your spouse/kids items. That would roughly simulate the feature.

      There's a simpler way if you can assume that only 2 people are using one account -- you'd use Greasemonkey to store all the items you flag as your own, and then when you rebalance, it would just put your own items every-other-one in the list. It "assumes" that everything not flagged as your own would be from one other person, so it could split the list 50-50. No central server needed in such a case.

      Having thought it through, I think I'll leave it to others. I'd want to do it the "right" way with the central server, which would take more time to put together than I have. It seems very useful, though. I hope other Greasemonkey developers are considering it. Heck, maybe there is a better way that is less investment for the developer. Better minds will find it.

    3. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would still be possible. Basically the plugin would have to display two (or more) queues to the user, and be responsible for arranging movies in the real Netflix queue so that they would be sent out in the correct order. So, they just need to track which user queue the last move shipped was in, and movies from other user queues up. (Okay, I don't want to really think about how it would work, but I think it would be possible).

    4. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      Ok, so keep the queue on the browser side. Keep feeding the netflix queue one at a time to mimic multiple queues. It's not an ideal emulation of the real multiple queues, but it might be passable.

    5. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      If you have a large queue, then when viewing the full queue in Firefox it is pretty slow. Way too much AJAX going on. But I'm not even sure if they have full screen movies on their site, at least the default has always been widescreen for me. And I haven't seen a full screen movie in the store in years either.

    6. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One important part of separate queues is that when one profile is slow to view/return movies, the other profile(s) are not affected and can still keep getting the next in their list.

      So, to do this *on top* of a single queue, you'd have to force the user to log when they send a movie back in the mail, so you could rebalance and have Netflix send that profile its next movie.

    7. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      GUI tricks can separate the one queue into two queues, which is all that happens with profiles.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    8. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by MrMunkey · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would be all that hard. There are a lot of Netflix scripts out there that do different things with you queue. You could create sub-queues by having the addon use a modulus of however many sub-queues you have. Say you have a 3 out a month plan and three sub-queues. The addon would "shuffle" the master queue according to the order of the sub-queues. That way each queue would get one DVD at a time. There are a few more intricacies there, but in theory it shouldn't be difficult. You would, however, have to limit yourself to one mailing address.

    9. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      The only part of 'profile' that matters is the separate queues.

      The movie ratings matter to some people too. Lots of multiple profile users have very different preferences.

    10. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by Spril · · Score: 1

      How would an addon deal with Netflix's pending deletion of hundreds, if not thousands, of disc ratings for each profile?

      Netflix is going to take entire families and give them a single ratings and recommendation pool. "Because you liked 'Teletubbies' and 'Aliens', here's our suggested film..."

      The only way around that would be to create a plugin that lets you delete every one of your ratings, and then re-create a different set, whenever a different user wants to log in. Hmm... if someone did that, maybe Netflix would notice the load on their servers wasn't so bad with profiles!

    11. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by ViperOrel · · Score: 1

      Surprised I haven't heard anyone suggest writing a screen scraper to capture your queue and movie ratings and save them to be uploaded to the next service to offer profiles. Now that would put a bee in their bonnet wouldn't it?

    12. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by jnana · · Score: 1

      Yes, having mom and dad and 2 children all submit ratings into a single profile will ruin recommendations for all 4 users, and there's no workaround for that.

    13. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by DickBreath · · Score: 1
      We have two adults and one child.

      Will this hypothetical FireFox extension solve the following problems:
      • Should the adults no longer access mature material so that the child does not see them?
      • Should the child be allowed to see mature material, including items placed in the queue by adults?
      • Should the child no longer be allowed to use NetFlix?
      • Will this FF extension deal okay with the fact that I have 190 items in my queue alone?
      • Will it prevent NetFlix from recommending my interests, such as gay themed movies, to the child or other adult? Will I get recommendations based on the child's or other adult's interest?
      • When I return a disk, will this FF extension make sure that NetFlix ships the next disk in MY queue?
      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    14. Re:Someone will greasemonkey it. by usermilk · · Score: 1

      GUI tricks can separate the one queue into two queues, which is all that happens with profiles.

      Unfortunately that is not all that happens with profiles. Profiles allow me to create a queue for television series, return an episode disc and be garuanteed another television series. Instead I will now have to micromanage my queue and interweave tv series into movies.

      That doesn't even keep into mind the ability to separate ratings, parental controls, etc.

  14. The so-called reason by g051051 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to their customer support, this was a feature only used by 1% of subscribers, but was a significant drain on resources, increased maintenance difficulties, and slowed down adding new features. I don't particularly buy most of that, but if the 1% thing is true, then I can see how they'd make that choice. If more of that 1% convert to full subscriptions rather than cancel, it'll be a win for them.

    1. Re:The so-called reason by Anita+Coney · · Score: 0

      I personally never used it nor saw a reason to use it. If a family member wants a movie we add it to the queue. The only reason I could see an advantage in using different accounts is so the kids won't know you're renting porn. But since Netflix doesn't rent porn, that's not really a reason.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:The so-called reason by g051051 · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend and I have wildly different tastes in movies. So, she has her own queue, and watches her movies at whatever pace she wants, and always has one available and on the way. My queue currently has 50 movies, so if we want to share an account, we need to actively interleave the movies to make sure she gets some that she likes in a timely fashion. It's just going to be a really big hassle to manage a single account, or cost more money to establish a second one for her.

    3. Re:The so-called reason by es330td · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the problem with the profiles from the user's perspective is that the user had to log in as a different user to utilize the features of the queues. If they could set up folders within a single login to which movies can be added and discs assigned to then it would make using the queues much simpler. I just sent them a User Request outlining the importance of being able to group movies and assign discs to the groups. The profiles *were* a PITA to maintain but they did work once set up.

    4. Re:The so-called reason by faloi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess your family has homogeneous movie tastes. My wife and I have pretty radically different tastes in movies. Most of the movies she likes, I don't like. Rather than add movies and bump stuff she wants to see off the queue, I could maintain my own queue. The onus was on Netflix to keep up with it. Going forward, it's going to be on us. And the fall-back movies if the one of the ones at the top of or queue can't get shipped is going to be a craps shoot. Maybe she'll get a movie she enjoys, maybe all the ones that come won't interest her at all.

      The only thing I didn't like about the separate queues was that only the primary account holder could browse the instant movies. My wife never used the feature, and I avoided rating movies I watched for fear it would distort the movies picked as ones she'd like to see. Which brings up another point...how can multiple family members track movies they like nowadays and have accurate recommended features? "This one's a special case...apparently she like romantic comedies and really bad horror movies!"

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    5. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a reason: It is to guarantee that your family members get a movie that they like. It is so you do not get three horror films and little Susie does not get her my little ponies movie.

      If you been using the Netflix account long enough, you know that the movies do not come in the order of your queue. So it is impossible to set it up saying n and n+1 is for the parents and n+2 is for the kid.

    6. Re:The so-called reason by Anita+Coney · · Score: 0

      "I guess your family has homogeneous movie tastes. My wife and I have pretty radically different tastes in movies."

      That makes no freaking sense whatsoever. My wife and I could have completely different tastes in movies and we could add those different genres of movies to the same queue!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    7. Re:The so-called reason by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "It is to guarantee that your family members get a movie that they like."

      Once again, that makes no freaking sense. I have four family members. I can add movies to the single queue and adjust that single queue to ensure that each of us get movies. You do realize you can change the order of the queue, right?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    8. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but now if you want to be fair and evenly distribute between the two tastes you will have to micro-manage the queue and make sure you alternate between "husband" movies and "wife" movies all the way down the list. PITA. My wife and I use the current system and it works quite well. We have 2-at-a-time with a queue for each of us, so we know that we will always have one of her movies and one of my movies to watch. We usually watch them together, but neither of us gets irritated at having to watch 3 movies in a row that the other picked out. My sister has a 2-at-a-time account and she uses one queue for movies and the other queue for TV-on-DVD. Sure you can work around it but it's a nice tool to make planning movie delivery easier. It automatically ensures you don't get a bunch of similar items in a row if you set it up that way. It's a really nice feature and we will be irritated to lose it. Enough to leave Netflix? Perhaps - but not to switch to Blockbuster. I'm done with that model.

    9. Re:The so-called reason by TechHSV · · Score: 1

      But you couldn't use the rating feature correctly. What do you rate a movie she loved but you hated? This leads to obvious problems when Netflix suggests movies to you. Which is one of the best features for us, since we don't keep up with movies as they come out. My wife and I don't have scour all of the new movies and read their descriptions because the ones we are more likely to like are suggested to us.

    10. Re:The so-called reason by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "we need to actively interleave the movies to make sure she gets some that she likes in a timely fashion. It's just going to be a really big hassle to manage a single account"

      It takes about 5 freaking seconds to pick up a movie in the queue and to drop it somewhere else. Does your computer even have a mouse? Are you using some utterly complicated command-line version of Netflix?

      If you want to watch Die Hard, for example. Put it on the top of your queue and you'll get it in the next batch. If you wife wants to watch a chick flick, she can add that to the number two position. She'll get it in the next batch. Even if Netflix has a "one movie at a time" plan, having separate queues would not give you two movies at a time.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    11. Re:The so-called reason by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "This leads to obvious problems when Netflix suggests movies to you."

      Ah, that's the reason. We rent movies and shows we like. I've never relied on Netflix's system of pushing its movies on us. I've never found it to be even remotely accurate other than by random chance.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    12. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so assume you have family members: A, B
      You have the queue ordered like this:
      A, B, A, B, A, B, A, B, A, B

      This is my wife and I. It has happened more than once that one of us will get all 3 movies one week because the other one had new releases up there that were short wait long wait, whatever. The beauty of the profiles is that if I have a bunch of new releases at the top of my queue, I'm still guaranteed to get a movie that I want to see that week. Whereas when my wife gets 3 movies and I get none, I'm stuck watching chick flicks that week with my wife.

    13. Re:The so-called reason by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "Yes, but now if you want to be fair and evenly distribute between the two tastes you will have to micro-manage the queue and make sure you alternate between "husband" movies and "wife" movies all the way down the list."

      As I've said previously, it takes about five seconds to drag and drop a movie in the queue. If you're too busy to do that, you're probably too busy to even watch movies.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    14. Re:The so-called reason by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "The beauty of the profiles is that if I have a bunch of new releases at the top of my queue, I'm still guaranteed to get a movie that I want to see that week."

      Once again, that makes no sense. If the movie in your individual queue, that you're "guaranteed" to get, is available for mailing, than it is necessarily available for mailing when it is in a single and shared queue. Having the separate queue in no way increases its chances of the movie of being available.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    15. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it never occurred to you that someone might not want to log in to reorder the queue every time a disc is returned, or check to make sure the DVD at the front of the queue is currently available, etc. Using profiles, I can add dozens of titles to my kids' queue and dozens to the queue for my wife and me, and I don't have to think about it until I need to add more to the queues.

      Of course, you're right, the guarantee mentioned above is achievable manually, but in that case why not just eliminate queues altogether? You can just log in every time you return a disc and select a new video, right? Right, but one of the greatest benefits of Netflix is the convenience. They're eliminating a substantial component of that for many subscribers (I don't buy the 1% mentioned above), and trying to claim that it's for our own benefit. That's a little hard to swallow, and I, for one, can't imagine staying with them after August if they push this through without some better explanation or an alternative means of achieving similar functionality.

    16. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if they're all using the same queue, there is no guarantee that everyone gets a movie each week. Depending on the personalities of the kids, it can be hell if one kid gets two movies and the other kid gets none that week because there was a movie on short/long wait.

    17. Re:The so-called reason by faloi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your usage model is just that significantly different from those of us using queues. I have so many movies queued up right now that it's almost a surprise what movies show up. I like it that way. My wife doesn't have many movies queued up. With multiple movies, it doesn't matter. We each get movies we want to watch when we send movies back.

      Under the new scheme, assuming that we don't check our queues every day, or the day we send them back, or whatever time works best to make sure a movie isn't pushed back in the queue, there's not an easy way to control which movies are going to arrive to ensure we both get stuff we want to watch. And it's certainly not as easy as DOING NOTHING.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    18. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize you have no control over the order in which your queue is sent to you, RIGHT?

    19. Re:The so-called reason by faloi · · Score: 1

      It's a classic YMMV. A lot of movies that have been recommended to me by Netflix (as an aside, how is that "pushing" it's movies on you, it's not like it autofills your queue, but I digress), have turned out to be pretty good. A lot of the movies I like tend to not be powerhouse studio productions, and the quality on smaller houses and independent films can vary greatly. Netflix recommended movies are another resource I can use to figure out whether something might be worth watching, and it certainly brings some stuff to the fore that I wouldn't have heard of otherwise.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    20. Re:The so-called reason by sqlrob · · Score: 1



      Queue is A1B1A2B2...

      B1 is not available. Therefore, A2 comes. With the profiles, B2 would've.

    21. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about being busy - it's about not even concerning myself with Netflix. If you are already logging in to Netflix every day and checking/adding, sure, it's no big deal. We don't use Netflix that way. My wife and I already have 50+ movies in each of our queues - neither of us even needs to think about Netflix (or log on to the site) for months at a time. Going down to one queue and constantly checking to make sure we spread our movies out is certainly not going to be a huge hardship, but it takes away from the set it and forget it aspect that is one of the reasons we like Netflix.

    22. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. Sometimes movies are unavailable.

    23. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I've said previously, it takes about five seconds to drag and drop a movie in the queue. If you're too busy to do that, you're probably too busy to even watch movies. You're missing the whole point. The whole point of Netflix is convenience. That's it. Anything that detracts from their convenience makes them less attractive, no matter how negligible it seems to you. No, it's not about price. Netflix is cheaper than the local Blockbuster, yes. They're not cheaper than the local public library.

      Also, your "5 seconds to drag and drop" is a drastic oversimplification. As you know full well and as many have already pointed out here in comments, there's a lot more involved than simply moving a movie in the queue now and then.
    24. Re:The so-called reason by Lost0ne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They might not get the movies at the top of their queue that are long wait, but if each family member has their own queue, then it can be assumed that each member has movies they want to see in their queue. So when they return a movie, the next movie they get from their queue will be one they want to see, even if it's the 4th, 9th, or 20th movie down the list. But in a shared queue, with a huge mess of long waits and new releases at the top, it's a crapshoot as to what gets sent out in a given week. One family member might get all the movies that week because everyone else's movies at the top of the queue ended up being short/long waits.

    25. Re:The so-called reason by DrOct · · Score: 1

      Can you not see how separate queues are easier? Sure you can manage an account the way you mention here, but it's easier to just let everyone manage their own queue, and not worry about what other people are doing, or having to check what's up next on the queue every time you return a movie because someone else might have moved something else up.

    26. Re:The so-called reason by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It takes about 5 freaking seconds to pick up a movie in the queue and to drop it somewhere else.

      Once you log in and navigate to the queue, yes. How many times a month do you do that? With my own profile, I only need to do it every few months.

    27. Re:The so-called reason by Thornburg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does your computer even have a mouse? Are you using some utterly complicated command-line version of Netflix? Come now, this is Slashdot, you should know that nearly any task that can be performed on a command-line will be faster that way than with a GUI, if you know what you are doing. The only exception I can think of would visually-based artistic things like drawing or creating a complicated 3D rendering.

      I assure you that if there were a CLI version of Netflix, it would take less time to type:

      netflix /add "Die Hard" p=1

      than it does to load the GUI page and click on the "send to top" button. And certainly placing items at a specific location on the list would be much faster.

      GUI is more intuitive, and that is great, but CLI is faster and more powerful (with a very small number of exceptions).
    28. Re:The so-called reason by g051051 · · Score: 1

      So, you think it's acceptable to have to rearrange the queue every time we return a movie? We don't always watch them in the order they're received, and if you've got multiple movies being returned in a short amount of time, the order that Netflix receives, processes and ships replacements isn't predictable. It doesn't matter if it takes 5 seconds...the point is that right now, with the Profiles feature, it takes ZERO seconds and works exactly the way we need it to.

    29. Re:The so-called reason by DrOct · · Score: 1

      Actually I think people who are really busy are the people that Netflix is most helpful for (it certainly is for me as there isn't the stress about watching something quickly and I don't have to make trips to the video store), and probably the customers that Netflix would want to keep the most. Anything that can make the people who watch movies slowly happier and more likely to stay with you would be a good business decision.

    30. Re:The so-called reason by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I tried the feature just so the kids could have a their own queue and I could have mine. It turned out to me to be more of a pain that it was worth. Even after I set the parent ratings to restrict what they could watch I still had to manage their queue for them. There are just some movies that maybe rated G or PG that I still don't want them to watch. That spongebob movie comes to mind. I hate that little fucker.

      Even with two queues the kids would still ask me if they could get this movie and all I wound up doing is managing two queue. I found it easier just to load the stuff they want in my queue anyway and be done with it.

      Another plus to this is I've been able to turn them away from this mass market hollywood crap and on to some quality. They are old enough now they can start to appreciate high quality stories and animation. Ghost in the shell to name one, and Full Metal Panic would be another.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    31. Re:The so-called reason by tmalone · · Score: 1

      Half the point of Netflix and the queue system is that you can forget about it. You don't have to remember to stop by the video store, ideally you don't have to remember to reorganize your queue.

      My wife and I use it to keep movies and TV shows separate. Before we found the profiles option we had to constantly fiddle with the queue to make sure that we didn't end up with three movies at once, especially during weeks when we were too busy to sit down and watch a full movie. So, we liked to keep episodic things around for those times. Now we'll have to make sure that things are carefully interleaved and when we want something to be at the top we'll have to reorganize because it will screw up the order.

      For us, this is just one more reason to drop Netflix. They already pissed us off with the windows only Watch it now feature that I assume our membership fee subsidized. They've gone from being a company that I was loyal to (to the point of not accepting a free month of service from them when they settled a class action lawsuit a couple years ago) to a company that I view with suspicion.

    32. Re:The so-called reason by tmalone · · Score: 1

      If you're too busy to stop by the video store, you're probably too busy to even watch movies.

    33. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we need to actively interleave the movies to make sure she gets some that she likes in a timely fashion. It's just going to be a really big hassle to manage a single account"

      It takes about 5 freaking seconds to pick up a movie in the queue and to drop it somewhere else. Does your computer even have a mouse? Are you using some utterly complicated command-line version of Netflix?

      If you want to watch Die Hard, for example. Put it on the top of your queue and you'll get it in the next batch. If you wife wants to watch a chick flick, she can add that to the number two position. She'll get it in the next batch. Even if Netflix has a "one movie at a time" plan, having separate queues would not give you two movies at a time. Some people have time to micro-manage their queue as you suggest. My suspicion is that the people who use the profile feature do not, or find that a waste of their time. I found it to be a great feature, and if they drop it, I will fire them out of principle.
    34. Re:The so-called reason by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

      I can see why the feature is so unpopular. I think that it is more important to see on a single queue what my next videos will be than to have a separate queue for each family member.

      I congratulate netflix for saying no to non-strategic features.

    35. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That kinda takes away from the add-and-forget-about-it ability of "managing" ones queue that I and I'm sure so many others liked.

    36. Re:The so-called reason by BMonger · · Score: 1

      I don't use multiple profiles but here is why the above doesn't necessarily work. If you have one user that likes to watch the newest movies all the time and somebody that likes to watch old TV shows, odds are they will only have the old TV show discs in. Interleaving these two queues will result in Netflix skipping the new movies in favor of the discs that sit around. With separate queues you're more likely to get a popular movie and an old TV show instead of just old TV shows.

    37. Re:The so-called reason by malchus842 · · Score: 1

      "It takes about 5 freaking seconds to pick up a movie in the queue and to drop it somewhere else. Does your computer even have a mouse? Are you using some utterly complicated command-line version of Netflix?"

      Right now, I have 200+ movies in my queue. My wife and kids have about 40. Everything is on auto-pilot. About once a month I go in and mess with my queue, adding movies, changing the order, etc. Otherwise, I spend zero time even thinking about it. My wife and kids handle it the same way - queue a bunch of stuff once or twice a month and movies just show up.

      I don't want to have to update my queue every day, or end up with no movie to watch because the 'wrong' one shows up, which can not happen now. It's a very useful feature. Without it, Netflix doesn't make sense for my family and we'll cancel.

    38. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't that people can't manage multiple users in one queue, it is that it is a pain and a cause of contention. Such that Netflix offered a feature that works very well. It is easy to use, fair, and unambiguous. They were proud of the feature when they offered it and now they are taking it away with no real compensation. It is going to make customers unhappy. Unhappy customers are not good for the bottom line and they are not good for the recruitment of new customers.

    39. Re:The so-called reason by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Plus, that assumes that you always get the movie at the top of the queue. Which is not always the case.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    40. Re:The so-called reason by residieu · · Score: 1

      My queue isn't really set up in the order I want to watch things. How can it be? I don't know what I'll want to watch few months from now. It's mostly in the order of when I added things to the queue.

      When I return a movie, I give it a look over and bump what I want to see next to the top. The queue is useful as a place to record all the things I've thought of that I want to see, to save me from the problem I have any time I go to the video store, having to think "What was that movie I wanted to rent...?". I've got all the movies I've been thinking about right in this list

    41. Re:The so-called reason by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't tried to share a queue with someone. It's harder than it appears. My wife and I were essentially "founding customers" of Netflix; we joined within a few months of them starting up. We have some movies we both enjoy watching together, and some we only watch together if one of us is completely bored. We would alternate spots in the queue, but then one of us would get busy and not watch ours for a week or so, then when the other person returned their movie, another movie would ship for the busy person, and all our movies at home would be for the person too busy to watch for a while.

      If the non-busy person moved their movie to the top of the queue, that would mess up the alternation, because wherever they moved it from would now have two of the other person's movies in a row, which believe me is not easy to fix in a long queue if you have a particular order you want to watch them in. Plus the busy person would complain about the other one getting two or more in a row. Also, Netflix would sometimes ship the second movie in your queue to help speed up service, and that would mess everything up.

      There were also problems when one person's queue was longer than the other's, and the recommendations were all messed up when you went to look for more movies to add. There are also a lot of movies that one of us would enjoy watching, but would never pick for ourselves, so it was often unclear exactly whose turn it was to have their pick on top of the queue.

      Essentially, we spent way too much time maintaining our queue. I was the one who suggested separate queues to Netflix in the first place (okay, a few other people may have suggested the same idea). A while after making that suggestion, with nothing being done, we suspended our account, citing that as one of our primary reasons.

      A couple years later, we found out that Netflix had finally implemented profiles, and that their turnaround time was rumored to be much better (our other reason for canceling), so we gave them another shot. Now, I hardly ever have to think about my queue. I can return my movies in the mailbox in the morning on my way out the door, when I don't have time to log on and maintain my queue, and only bother with my queue every week or so when their new releases rss feed has a major update.

      Depending on what they replace it with, I may end up staying with Netflix, but this is definitely going to prompt me to explore other options. Heck, I'd probably be okay just going with pay-per-view.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    42. Re:The so-called reason by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does make sense. With profiles, no tedious queue adjustment is necessary--it just works. This is exactly what software is supposed to do: make tedious tasks (queue reordering to support multiple virtual queues) simple (real multiple queues). Just because I can reorder a single queue for a whole family does not mean I want to. Software should manage that.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    43. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next, to reduce the drain on resources and decrease maintenance difficulties, they'll remove accounts. Whee, now we don't have to track any users at all!

      I can't see how profiles as a feature would really increase the code's complexity so badly that it should be axed.

    44. Re:The so-called reason by PLBogen · · Score: 1

      Customer support has been quoting anywhere from 1% - 5%. Regardless if any of the customers find it essential than keeping it should be better than any new features. After all what else do you want NetFlix to do? If it was such a maintenance nightmare than maybe the problem is lousy programmers writing crappy code.

    45. Re:The so-called reason by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Folders would be nice, but doesn't really address the problem with recommendations. What happens when my child wants to give Alvin and the Chipmunks 5 stars and I want to give Saw IV 4 stars? "Netflix recommends 'Critters 2: The Main Course'."

      The profiles as they are now really don't work any differently than separate accounts, except the cost is rolled into one account. Splitting into second accounts will cost most people more money. Only people with 6, 7, or 8-at-a-time plans who split it into queues of 3 or more will be able to switch without a price penalty.

    46. Re:The so-called reason by ChrisLeif · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem with Amazon. My wife likes current events, politics, biographies and modern novels. I like science fiction, fantasy, classics, and computer non-fiction. Amazon's engine must go crazy trying to rationalize all those choices and some of its recommendations are pretty funny.

    47. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, it makes no sense to you because you just don't understand how Profiles work.

      It isn't for setting up separate queues and then having Netflix round-robin select from which queue a movie is selected.

      Instead, you assign a subset of your plan to each queue. We have the 4 DVD plan. I assign 2 DVDs to my queue and 2 DVDs to my partner's queue. Thus, it is assured that of 4 DVDs at home, 2 will be mine and 2 will be my partners.

      Without profiles, even if we interleave our choices, it is totally up to availability. If I have slot #1 and #3 and they are not available because they are new releases, a single queue isn't going to give me #5. It is going to send #2, #4, #5 and #6. 3 partner choices and 1 of mine.

    48. Re:The so-called reason by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1

      The only reason I could see an advantage in using different accounts is so the kids won't know you're renting porn. But since Netflix doesn't rent porn, that's not really a reason. So you're saying everyone in your family has exactly the same taste in movies? Seems unlikely. That you also ignore the "Movies You'll Love" suggestions? Too bad you don't use that feature either.

      And, most importantly, since Netflix doesn't rent porn, no one should be allowed to use separate profiles. Yeah, that makes perfect sense.

    49. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to their customer support, this was a feature only used by 1% of subscribers I think I heard about this feature by word of mouth. Maybe it was undermarketed. 'Cause it rocks.
    50. Re:The so-called reason by lgw · · Score: 1

      Wait - what? SpongeBob will ruin your kids' minds, but an adult-themed anime packed with realistic violence and occasional sex is fine? It's OK for your kids to see a serial killer who ties up naked women and skins them alive, while taping and distributing the "show", but SpongeBob is bad?

      I can't watch SpongeBob either, but WTF does that have to do with what's age-appropriate?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    51. Re:The so-called reason by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Spongebob is unsafe at any age. Anyone who lets their brats watch it needs to be flogged.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    52. Re:The so-called reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, what is your problem? If the chick flick isn't available, it switches to the next available which may not be what she wanted. Juggling a queue manually is an inconvenience and I don't think you're going to convince anyone otherwise by belittling, repeating yourself and being stubborn.

  15. First time for everything by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been a Netflix subscriber for over four years. This is the first time they've ever taken a step backwards. And their complete lack justification is very strange.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:First time for everything by Nef · · Score: 1

      Damn, I fed the troll...

      Anita, at least post your contradicting crap a few threads away from each other when you're going to troll. And yes, I'm the same AC that slapped you down above for your post that's exactly the opposite from this rant.

    2. Re:First time for everything by wsanders · · Score: 1

      My guess is they will integrate whatever comes after Profiles to address two other limitations that people I know complain about much more:

      - 500 limit on your queue
      - When your queue does get big, it takes forever to load.

      I'm also lobbying for an "Autopilot" feature I can turn on and off that will automatically send me recommended movies so I don't have to pick movies unless I want to.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    3. Re:First time for everything by linzeal · · Score: 1

      500 limit on the queue? I don't think I have watched 500 movies in my life and I'm 30. I pry have played 500 video games though.

    4. Re:First time for everything by Atario · · Score: 1

      This is the first time they've ever taken a step backwards.
      Not true. At some point they stopped stocking porn.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  16. For your convenience ... by richg74 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why? To '...help us to continue to improve the Netflix website for all our customers.'

    Touching. I'm reminded of a sign I once saw on the door of a bank branch, some years ago while I was living in Boston:

    For your convenience, this branch will be closed Monday, mm/dd/yy, a legal holiday.
    For my convenience. Heartwarming, isn't it, how these folks are always looking out for us.
    1. Re:For your convenience ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Why? To '...help us to continue to improve the Netflix website for all our customers.'


      Touching. I'm reminded of a sign I once saw on the door of a bank branch, some years ago while I was living in Boston:

      For your convenience, this branch will be closed Monday, mm/dd/yy, a legal holiday.

      For my convenience. Heartwarming, isn't it, how these folks are always looking out for us. Because the bank likes to screw their customers, they will be closed.

      For your convenience, they are telling you about it.
    2. Re:For your convenience ... by karmatic · · Score: 1

      "For your convenience, this branch will be closed Monday, mm/dd/yy, a legal holiday."

      For my convenience. Heartwarming, isn't it, how these folks are always looking out for us.


      Perhaps the sign was for your convenience, rather than the closing?

    3. Re:For your convenience ... by raddan · · Score: 1

      Oh, well, then you're also familiar with the litany of "conveniences" the MBTA lovingly provides for us on a daily basis. Like holding the train at Kenmore for screaming hordes of drunk Red Sox fans, making it a total crapshoot as to whether or not I can make my connecting commuter train from North Station. Recently, I've resorted to bringing a pair of running shoes and shorts and just hauling ass across the city, on foot.

    4. Re:For your convenience ... by LinuxIsStillBetter · · Score: 1

      Why? To '...help us to continue to improve the Netflix website for all our customers.' To serve man.
  17. Re:oh noes! by maxume · · Score: 1

    I just look for either sun or clouds. Both are enough to know that there is going to be weather that day and crack one open.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  18. Cost savings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they wanted to save cost why not leave their interface the way it was instead of making changes to it every two or three months. Seriously. All this web 2.0 crap is killing my old laptop computer and it is totally unnecessary. The site was wonderful a couple years ago when I signed up and now it's a damn iPod clone. Ugh.

    I'm writing them to say I disapprove of this and if they do not have a similar replacement feature then I will look elsewhere for DVD rentals.

  19. Lovefilm by Stephen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's strange because Lovefilm, the dominant DVD-by-mail company in the UK, has only recently introduced this feature.

    --
    11.00100100001111110110101010001000100001011010001 1000010001101001100010011
    1. Re:Lovefilm by mpcooke3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, when I saw the feature I was quite impressed because I figured it must introduce quite a lot of programming complexity with little benefit to underlying profits.

      I bet they did it to play catch up with netflix and now netflix has realised it's too much hassle to maintain!

    2. Re:Lovefilm by LinuxIsStillBetter · · Score: 1

      That's strange because Lovefilm, the dominant DVD-by-mail company in the UK, has only recently introduced this feature. Do they deliver to the US? ;-)
  20. Offtopic- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 0, Redundant

    On the comment of "improving customer relations" the local branch of the bank I deal with was recently closed down.

    A sign on the front door said "In order to serve you better, this branch has been closed"

    The branch wasn't *that* bad, but I thought the wording of the sign was funny.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  21. unknown reasons? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Looks clear to me from reading the summary, they get 2 paying accounts instead of one.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  22. Helping Some Students May Harm High Achievers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe too many customers is too "confuse", don't know how to use this feature. Too many support cost for the feature. Indeed, "No customer left behind".

  23. Maybe they will replace it by bay43270 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use the profiles feature, but not in the intended way. I keep a separate queue for different types of movies. I currently have 3 profiles. One for TV shows (so I always have 1 Torchwood disc at home), one for mindless action & scifi movies that I can watch without my wife, and one for movies for us to watch together. All the movies are for me, but I've had to create three profiles with fake names. Each time I switch between queues, I have to login again. Any since it thinks each queue represents a separate person, it doesn't remember any of my past rentals or movie ratings.

    Personally, when I got the email from Netflix, a little part of me thought 'good... maybe their going to try to do it right this time'

    1. Re:Maybe they will replace it by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your keeping one Torchwood disc at home at all times. Your sacrifice in reducing the availability of Torchwood to hitherto-unexposed innocents is touching. ;)

      I kid, I kid... but seriously, is Season Two any better than Season One? As a Dr Who fan, I was pretty disappointed by Season One of Torchwood.

    2. Re:Maybe they will replace it by tmalone · · Score: 1

      I would like to be able to 'tag' dvds in my queue. If it then let me filter by tags, or stagger the queue by tags, I'd be happy. I agree that the current profiles feature is a weird hack for the way I use it. Tags would be much more useful. The people who like to keep separate recommendations would be screwed though. At least it tells you why something was recommended.

    3. Re:Maybe they will replace it by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      Season 2 isn't out yet. I just finished season 1. I agree that Dr Who is better, but it fills the gaps. I also like it better than the Shara Jane series

  24. Now I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just called Netflix customer service to ask for clarification on how this helps improve the web site. The rep responded that they needed to free up programming space for better features, and that it's really a tiny, tiny percentage of people that use profiles to separate queues. (Slashdot and Gizmodo, the two sites I checked for reactions to this, are apparently chock full of tiny, tiny percentages.)

    When I told her that I'm a programmer and I don't understand what it means to free up programming space, she was quiet for a moment and then said, "This is really a decision that they've already made, so it's not like they're going to change their minds."

    I'm all for freeing up programming space. Statistics show that programming space will be all used up in the next 10 years if we don't start conserving it.

    1. Re:Now I get it by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have we reached peak programming space already?!

    2. Re:Now I get it by hopelessdeskmonkey · · Score: 1

      Well, now that programming space is getting close to $150 a barrel we all have to figure out how to conserve it, think of the children in the future who won't have any programming space at all. Oh the humanity.

    3. Re:Now I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No big surprise that the customer service rep on the phone doesn't know the exact terminology, but as a programmer, you'd have to be stupid to not know what she means. If a large portion of the bugs, requests, and other issues that the programmers have to deal with come from a complicated feature (maybe due to implementation, but still) that only a minority of people use, then it's time to get rid of that feature.

      Personally I tried to use profiles with my wife, and we quickly gave up on it, because it had so many 'quirks'. I would prefer they drop the existing feature and come back to it when they have an idea how to do it better.

      I've been faced with the same decision many times before. Believe it or not, a small company I used to work for was still offering web-based e-mail just 6 months ago. This is a company whose business has nothing to do with web-based email, it was just a coincidental feature they added for subscribers back in 1999 or so, when they had very few users, and it was easy enough to keep it all on one server. Add tens of thousands users, a huge uptake in spam, and the emergence of excellent free e-mail services like Gmail, and wasting programmer and sysadmin time managing a service like e-mail was a major time sink for the company.

      Sadly it took 3 years to convince the business to get rid of it, and instead of providing a reasonable migration period with forwarding to their new address, they ended up just dropping it entirely with about 2 weeks notice. That company had a tendency, if it ever got around to doing the 'right thing' (that the entire IT team recommended) it was for entirely the wrong reasons.

      Anyway...not an exact comparison to the netflix profiles, but you get the idea.

    4. Re:Now I get it by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Netflix, 2008 -- "One profile should be enough for anyone"

    5. Re:Now I get it by btphelps · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Free up programming space?" This means save a dime. You might recall that Netflix is offering a $1 million prize to someone who can improve their recommendations engine by 10%, and on the other hand they can't afford to maintain profiles. Give me a break.

    6. Re:Now I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They'll soon have more 'programming space' than they know what to do with, as their users start canceling their service.

    7. Re:Now I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have probably figured out that the CS rep is not a programmer.

    8. Re:Now I get it by dysk · · Score: 1

      She meant free up developer time.

    9. Re:Now I get it by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I told her that I'm a programmer and I don't understand what it means to free up programming space, From the various snippets the customer service people have given out... if you read between the lines it sounds like Netflix's profile system was poorly written, doesn't scale, and takes up a lot of resources (all due to that "poorly written" thing again), and Netflix either doesn't have the man hours or the programming talent to rewrite the feature to make it work properly. They did a cost/benefit analysis of how much they thought it would cost versus the people who used the feature and figured out junking profiles was the best option.
    10. Re:Now I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for freeing up programming space. I'm a programmer too. Thank god they're saving the programming space. That's one less thing to contribute to global warming. We had more programming space at my office, but we had to cut back when the cost of oil went up.
  25. Consumer action by Mulligan · · Score: 1

    I just called and told them that I intend to cancel my account on the day they remove my ability to maintain separate queues.

    1. Re:Consumer action by kmsigel · · Score: 1

      I will cancel as well, though probably sooner just out of spite. I maintain one queue for me and my wife, and my kids each get a queue. We don't use it that much, so the benefit of the separate queues just barely tips it in favor of keeping the service. Without separate queues, it isn't worth the hassle.

    2. Re:Consumer action by richpoore · · Score: 1

      I'm canceling too. Probably sooner. I was thinking about it already but this just made my decision for me. It was nice for my son to have his own que. It was nice while it lasted. Hello, redbox.

  26. Anybody know a better service? by lcampagn · · Score: 1

    For those considering defecting, it does not appear that Blockbuster has a comparable profiles feature. Does anybody know of another service that might work?

  27. Send comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.netflix.com/Suggest?type=2&lnkctr=cu_suggest

    I sent mine to the effect of "...if this becomes a scheduling burden I'll have to look into other service providers, such as Block Buster."

    Anyone know if Block Buster has a "queue"-type functionality? And I said I would never go back to them...

  28. Didn't know by The+Aethereal · · Score: 1

    I didn't know they had this feature. With Blockbuster, my fiancee and I order one movie for her, one movie for me, and one for us. It can sometimes be difficult to manage. I would have switched back to Netflix if I knew about this. Too bad they are getting rid of it.

  29. Get off my lawn. by numbsafari · · Score: 1

    Get off my lawn.

  30. Netflix blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Netflix community blog discusses this. Still sounds like smoke being blown up our....

    https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2765056849626104020&postID=3792638994944169934&pli=1

  31. no reason to switch back now by sykkn · · Score: 0

    I am currently using Blockbuster Total Access, but have been thinking of switching back to Netflix because I missed the profiles feature. I guess I won't be worrying about switching back again, unless they come out with the XBOX 360 integration I have been hearing rumors about.

  32. AppleTV here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Profiles was an excellent feature of Netflix. It gave each member of my family their own queue and avoided any arguments about which disc was next. I'm shopping for a new HDTV. As soon as I get it I'm buying an Apple TV and getting rid of Netflix.

    I don't think Netflix is even providing an automated way to merge the individual queues back into one - each family member might need to do it manually. What a pain and a stupid idea from Netflix. Up until now I thought they were a good company.

  33. The ONLY reason I would have switched to Netflix by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Profiles is the only reason I would have switched from Blockbuster to Netflix. Blockbuster was great for my wife and I because we could return movies to the store and get more movies for free (my wife watches a lot of stuff on the days she has off). But we're moving away from any nearby Blockbuster stores this week so I was seriously considering switching to Netflix. I would love it if my wife and I each had our own queue. Then we wouldn't get 10 romantic comedies in a row or 10 action movies. Ah well.

  34. Just a guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to guess that they're ending it because it's complicating their data model too much. No, I have no evidence for that, but something very similar has happened twice with the application I work on. Early on we had a request for similar "subaccounts." If we had written the original application with that in mind, it probably wouldn't have been so awful, but instead we grafted them on, reusing "primary" account code as much as possible but finding lots of places where we had to add special-case handling for the subaccounts. When I inherited responsibility for the billing code, I found that roughly 15% was dedicated to subaccounts -- totally disproportionate to their adoption or usefulness. It got to where I had to put it to my boss: give me a month to clear up this mess or get rid of the feature. Now we're trying to phase them out, which turns out to be the worst possible way to handle it.

    Another very similar situation arose with a feature designed to let customer service reps temporarily assume customers' identity. Again the crux of the problem was the multiplication of special-case code: "if user.isRep() x; else y;" became a plague on the application. Again, it came down to refactoring a large part of the code base or discontinuing the feature.

  35. My Email to Netflix by Scyber · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I just wanted to share that I am extremely disappointed to see Profiles going away. Profiles have allowed my wife and I to share a netflix account without any marital discord. Now I will have to navigate the horrors of balancing my wife's desire for romantic comedies with my desire for action & sci-fi movies. I will be sure to forward you the transcripts of our arguments so you too can join in the discomfort."

    1. Re:My Email to Netflix by morari · · Score: 0, Troll
      Next time, perhaps you should try marrying someone with similar tastes.

      Furthermore, why not just sign-up for two accounts? Is the price of having two "one-at-a-time" accounts that disproportionate to the price of one "two-at-a-time" account?

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    2. Re:My Email to Netflix by danzona · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1 at a time: $9 / month
      2 at a time: $14 / month

      Proportionally, a 29% surcharge to have 2 x 1 at a time.

    3. Re:My Email to Netflix by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Next time, perhaps you should try marrying someone with similar tastes. Maybe he wanted to marry a woman.
  36. Cope by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think profiles are causing a real PITA for the site programmers to maintain code and scrapping it all together will allow faster and more flexible programming models.

    My boss' response to that kind of reasoning? backed up by the marketing department, CEO, and customers? "Cope."

    Massively degrading the user's experience is not excused by programmer's convenience.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:Cope by DrOct · · Score: 1

      Thank you! If the old code is causing a problem then they just need to wait longer and figure out how to work around it or re-implement it with new code that won't get in the way.

    2. Re:Cope by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      Massively degrading the user's experience is not excused by programmer's convenience.

      First you'll have to prove that it's a "massive" degrading of the users experiance. I'd argue it isn't.

      First, it doesn't effect all the customers. Second, it's a minor inconvenience to those that are effected. They'll have to move a few movies around in their queue, which is a simple enough exercise. Unfortunate? Definitely. Some sort of "massive degradation of user experiance"? Hardly. They'd have to remove your ability to even look at your queue all together if you want to claim that.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    3. Re:Cope by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 3, Informative

      First you'll have to prove that it's a "massive" degrading of the users experiance. I'd argue it isn't.

      Proof isn't necessary; if a user says that it's less convenient for them, it is reasonable to believe them.

      The profiles feature is what makes Netflix usable for my family. We have very different movie preferences, and this change promises to throw out all of the movie ratings except for those associated with the main profile. I'm not a heavy user, and I have 70+ movies in my queue, which will all be deleted (along with hundreds of my movie ratings) on September 1st. Netflix's advice is to print out the queue and manually add those movies to the main account's queue. Unfortunately, different family members watch movies at different rates, so without a lot of manual queue management (logging in every time we return a video) things will quickly get out of sync. Without profiles, there won't be much point in continuing the service for me, which is fine; it's just video, not something important.

      Netflix claims that only 1% of their users use this feature. Apparently they think that risking 1% of their business is worth the benefits of reducing software overhead, which tells me that their software must really suck.

    4. Re:Cope by bughunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First you'll have to prove that it's a "massive" degrading of the users experiance.
      A manager's next response: "Pardon Me?? You have the burden of proof here, not marketing. If you continue to demonstrate such arrogance, you'll be out of work."

      I'm an engineering manager, and agree with the grandparent. We're not in business for the convenience of the engineers. If you can provide a marketing analysis to support your argument, I'll listen. If you can produce a cost/benefit analysis to support your position, I'll listen. If you can produce an ethical/moral/legal justification, I'll listen. If you're whinging because "it's not convenient," all you will do is piss me off.

      This seems like a rather poor move, marketing wise. I'm annoyed that I have to move my wife's 200+ movie list over to my main profile, which is never used. But if its simply for the "convenience" of the engineers, I'll be royally pissed.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    5. Re:Cope by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Seriously. It sounds like their team wasn't properly taking time to maintain and refactor their code to ensure smooth future development.

    6. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your opinion highly relevant, given that you obviously don't even use this feature. Thanks for sharing.

    7. Re:Cope by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Then the engineers say "Look, the code sucks but it is what it is. It takes us 3 full-time engineers to maintain it as-is. It take 5 full-time engineers 3 months to re-write the system to reduce the required maintenance to 0.5 engineers per week. Also, that new Project X that is the next top priority will be severely impacted by this existing Profile code - so we either need to fix the Profile code for Project X or scrap it all-together. Those are the facts. Now's where you make your management decision on whether we fix profiles or disable profiles."

    8. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an engineering manager, and agree with the grandparent.

      dude, you have the coolest granny/grandpa on the block!
      let's have an off-topic discussion about grandparent-grandchildren relationships! slashdot-style!
    9. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not in business for the convenience of the engineers. No, you're not, but programmer inconvenience can have impact on your costs and your delivery capability. It isn't always (just) whining - it can be a persistent drain on your ability to implement new features, and you have to decide whether a feature is worth its cost.

      I'm sure this decision was not made by programmers alone. In fact, I would bet that like most advanced features, a rather small percentage of customers ever used it, or even knew it was there. If that's true, then the benefit is low.

      A feature like profiles would, I'd imagine, have complicating implications all over the site, bogging down every new feature they try to add. That's the cost.

      Assuming both of these are true, you're hurting the user experience of everyone in order to enable a feature for a few.

      If it IS widely used, they yeah, you have to suck it up, or find a better architecture. But if that's true, then this is a gross failure of management. Which frankly, from a business as successful as Netflix, seems unlikely to me.
    10. Re:Cope by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Or they were just finding it near impossible to scale queues up/out in the shipping department.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    11. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slightly degrading a tiny percent of users' experience IS excused by programmer's convenience.

      Fixed that for you. This is a minor change, not the frickin holocaust. It it frees up development time for more important business ventures, than everyone wins. The options aren't:

      "take it away or don't take it away"

      The options are:

      "take it away, hire more developers, or 'cope' with significantly slower development of new features"

      You can't wish away development complexity just because you're in that 1% or less that uses the feature.

      And yes, it's obvious that the people coming to the slashdot story and comment are the ones who use the feature. Most people who use netflix would skip the story and move on thinking "who gives a crap?". I'm only checking this story out because I tried the profiles when I started netflix, and stopped using them because they had too many issues. Good riddance - maybe after they refactor the code they can reimplement profiles in a way that makes more sense.

    12. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do most "as a manager" replies in Slashdot are antagonistic?

      A decent manager would inquire to see if there is a valid business reason for the complaint without alienating or intimidating the developer.

      A few simple questions like:
      - "I understand it can be inconvenient, does it affect the development cycle?"
      - "And how many hours does that feature take to test"?
      - "How many defects are related to that feature?"
      - "How many people are using the feature?"

      Inquiring with a curious tone can provide clues of valid issues that are making development more expensive than it needs to be.

      Countering employee complains with posturing and threats is not good for any business.

    13. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a cost-benefit analysis, to me.

    14. Re:Cope by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Amazon developers have a strategy called "ignoring the HiPPO". You ignore the highest paid person(s) in the office and focus on what the customer wants. Just because something's hard doesn't mean you scrap a feature customers have come to expect to do it the easy way.

    15. Re:Cope by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps someone needs to higher engineers who manage the code base a bit better.

    16. Re:Cope by bughunter · · Score: 1
      See, now you're not just telling me it needs to be removed because it's "inconvenient." That's a cost/benefit analysis, and I'll listen. With interest.

      In response, I'll probably tell you to go back and give me another estimate for rewriting it so that it *includes* affordably-managed profiles so that I can make a fully informed decision. If your first estimate has any accuracy, then even if you double it in order to offer profiles, it can still be justified in the long run, and show a return on investment in about a year.

      And if you want my admiration, in addition to simple respect, you'll also make a recommendation that is supported by a quantitative comparative analysis using valid assumptions and estimates. I'll even give you the credit for the idea when I pitch it to *my* boss.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    17. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a minor inconvenience to those that are effected [SIC]. You may consider a movie queue "minor" but in the context of what NetFlix is it's a dramatic loss in functionality.

      It'd be like MySpace no longer offering profile comments. "Comments? Ah, that's such a minor thing!" In context, it's huge.

      Unless they have some new amazing way for me to vote Saw a five-star and my wife a one-star and not have it mess up the rating system... I don't see how this could possibly be a "minor" change.

      There must be a ridiculously good reason for them to actually remove such significant functionality.
    18. Re:Cope by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      > Why do most "as a manager" replies in Slashdot are antagonistic?

      Because when we post, it is generally because we are exasperated by some bullshit engineer response/justification, hence the posts are generally antagonists.

      You wouldn't believe how many time I have been served bullshit arguments to drop useful features from a codebase because of some ego trip from an engineer. Like the "it is too difficult", "it produces support issues", "nobody uses it anymore", and, when you dig into it, you just discover that it is because it was written by a guy they can't fathom that just left the company (or have been promoted to management).

      > Inquiring with a curious tone can provide clues of valid issues that are making development more expensive than it needs to be.

      Note that the issue here is that you considering this as an employee complain. Well, having to actually perform the work they are paid for cannot be considered a complain. It is a suggestion, and should be treated as such. And, as a manager, you should already know the answers to the 4 questions you are asking him.

      But if you start asking for confirmations, you can easily end up where you don't want to go, because the guy may start spewing bullshit arguments. Like:

      * "Of course, it does affect the dev cycle, if we keep it we will miss the deadline". Translation is: "If you keep this feature, I will say that it is your fault when we'll miss the deadline (because I am not going to work hard if you don't agree to me)"

      * "This features is the longest to test". If you point at data that proves otherwise, the rest will be "Not everything related to that feature is taken into account, you have to factor in the cost of the ocmplexity on the other features, which I estimate out of my ass to 25%"

      * "While there are not a lot of defects about this particular feature [because it is not very used], 30% of all other defects comes from the fact that this feature exist. If we remove it the defect rate will come down"

      * "Nobody use the feature". If you point to the contrary, the answer will morph into "they don't really want that feature, but something very different that we will have the time to do if we drop that feature"

      And, at that point, as a manager, you are fucked. Because if you fight back, you'll be in much worse shape than if you politely said "No, we need to keep this feature because [...]". And the feature will mysteriously become buggier and buggier, and harder and harder to use, etc, etc.

      Now, if you carve under the threat, you'll have lost control of the development, the engineer will make you dance on your head, and will end up with a shitty product. You know that, most of the products around suffer form that.

      This is why, in respectable software companies, you have product managers that are busy with the marketing aspect "is the feature needed?", engineering managers that are concerned with the "how much does it cost, with everything take into account?" aspect, and architects that have the final say on the "does it technically make sense?".

      Note that the engineers have no product responsibility there. Of course, they have very useful input to the managers at stake, but as you don't want me to mess with your code, engineers don't have to mess with management decisions.

      And sorry if that post seems antagonist... :-)

    19. Re:Cope by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      Unless they have some new amazing way for me to vote Saw a five-star and my wife a one-star and not have it mess up the rating system... I don't see how this could possibly be a "minor" change.

      Ah, that's actually a very good point and a great example of functionality that will be lost. I haven't used a profile in many years and when I did, I don't recall there being separate rating systems. The other examples of separate managed queue is the minor inconvenience I was thinking of. A separate rating system is actually a big change indeed because it has no possible alternative other than separate accounts, which I think is ridiculous but doable for anyone who cares enough.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    20. Re:Cope by schwaang · · Score: 1

      Perhaps someone needs to higher engineers who manage the code base a bit better.

      Wait were you trying to reply to this thread?

      > I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?

      No. You'd probably do all your work but never save it.

    21. Re:Cope by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Long day. I've been up 28 hours so far. My mistake.

    22. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most managers are disposable and the result of the real manager [director or higher] being lazy and wanting someone else to do the paper work. If you are below the level of director and your title is manager watch out. Your just a glorified PowerPoint/excel monkey more easily replaced than those who work for you.

      Have you ever met a middle manager that was brilliant? Point in case is 7 digits obtuse response. As if being a manager gives you access to special manager only knowledge. Good decision making and solution option comparison is rarely done by the manager more likely some brilliant punk kid just out of college reporting to some dead ender manager.

    23. Re:Cope by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      If you only worked under incompetent managers, then I can understand that you are biter.

      But you can't hide from the truth: if the software is a multi-millions code line monster, you won't succeed without good management AND good coders. And not with everyone doing everyone else job.

      And about the "manager only knowledge", well, you know, the good engineering manager know the whole product, knows exactly the marketing requirements, the product roadmap, and align everything with the company strategy. He knows exactly the state of the development, its quality issues, support issues, etc. You know, because it is his job. That is the "manager only knowledge", that you are so fast to dismiss. Maybe all you ever got were bean-counters PHB managers, in which case, I feel sorry for you.

      Btw, my actual title had "VP" in it, but you don't have to believe me...

    24. Re:Cope by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they'd also use proper grammar.

    25. Re:Cope by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It's unfortunate, but I don't know if it's a massive degradation of service for most users.

      Heck, I didn't even know that feature existed.

      I don't think a decision about this is about convenience to the programmer, as you suggest, no one really cares about them. But a programmer's time isn't free. If the feature takes an inordinate amount of time to maintain and it's not used that much, then I don't see how the higher-ups would push it through unless it's a pet project. And if something about the feature causes instability to the service, the risk of having a service go down for everyone vs. a few percent of users could be too great.

      It could be a "feeler" to see how many people would object to losing it to the point that they'll cancel their plan, though that could blow back and promote a feature that they didn't market so well.

      That said, all this in this post and in this thread is highly speculative, they don't provide any details.

    26. Re:Cope by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      A manager's next response: "Pardon Me?? You have the burden of proof here, not marketing. If you continue to demonstrate such arrogance, you'll be out of work."

      Then I would show him that 2% of accounts use this feature, and this feature accounts for 20% of programming time. The manager would say, "wow, that is a real waste of money, kill it now. You get a promotion."

    27. Re:Cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think profiles are causing a real PITA for the site programmers to maintain code and scrapping it all together will allow faster and more flexible programming models.

      My boss' response to that kind of reasoning? backed up by the marketing department, CEO, and customers? "Cope."

      Massively degrading the user's experience is not excused by programmer's convenience.

      "Massively degrading the user's experience is not excused by programmer's convenien"

      AMEN!!

      I'm from the school of, ADAPT OR DIE!

  37. Me and my S.O. used this extensively. by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    We only have a two out at a time plan and it works great, at any given time we have two movies to pick from. No arguments over someone hogging all of the movie choices, options most of the time for either of us to watch (save for the 2 days between sending an old one out and recieving a new one in). But considering 1 in 5 discs I've gotten from them is bad and needs a replacement coupled with the loss of queues and having a blockbuster around the corner, I think I may be looking for a change. Their online unlimited movies just isn't worth it considering the mainstream movies are few and far between.

  38. Netflix, can we please give our friends aliases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 2 Netflix friends named "John". It's impossible to tell them apart on most screens. Can't you at least append the last initial to their names? Or let me give them a nickname?

  39. Ratings and Movies You'll Like toasted too by cydnub · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not only were profiles helpful for queues as stated here, but also for keeping the varied tastes of myself, wife and children separate too. Having gone through and rated a large number of movies, we are now getting *fairly* accurate predictions of movies we might like.

    If they actually follow through with this and family/friends merge into one profile, the prediction algorithm will be lobotomized since it will try to predict based on different people's opinions. We'll be back to getting notices like this one that I got before we had separate profiles: Based on your ratings, we think you'll like the following two movies: Bambi Platinum Edition and Scarface 20th Anniversary Edition.

    1. Re:Ratings and Movies You'll Like toasted too by emag · · Score: 1

      Based on your ratings, we think you'll like the following two movies: Bambi Platinum Edition and Scarface 20th Anniversary Edition. "Say hello to my little hopping friend!"?

      I'm already preparing the wife for the cancellation of our account, since we use profiles the same way so many many people in this tiny minority do, and it would increase our costs by $6/mo for the equivalent abilities using separate accounts. Not to mention all the screwed up and/or lost ratings & recommendations.
      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  40. I asked for a feature LIKE the one this one by HikingStick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was in the first wave to join Netflix, and I was a user who, early on, made repeated requests for better ways to manage the queue. What they implemented was a good try, but it was not that for which I was looking. As the account owner, I wanted to be able to manage all queues from a single screen. I despised the way I needed to manage each queue on its own screen (I gave up on profiles at least a year ago, so I don't know if they rectified this).

    What I envisioned originally was to be able to manage multiple lists on a single screen: lets call them List A, List B, and List C. When browsing and adding movies to the queue, you still have one button to add movies, but it would have a drop-down option that would let you choose another queue. Thus, the default button action would be the same, but you would have the option of diverting the request. For queue management, I had pitched a system similar to the one the adopted, allowing you to specify how to intersperse the movies from the other queues. For controls, I envisioned parameters only on the sub-queues. Using the names I provided earlier in and example, you could configure List B to send one movie after every three sent on the primary queue. I envisioned being able to drag-and-drop between the lists on the same GUI page. As for others adding their preferences to the queue, the account owner could specify users (by email address) who could logon and add to specific queues, much the way the service was implemented. For younger kids who may not have their own eddresses, Netflix could have allowed the account owner to create logon accounts that would be child accounts and have limited rights. If the owner's logon was thisuser@somedomain.com, for example, I envisioned secondary accounts that could be named subAccountName~thisuser@somedomain.com.

    Oh, and yes, I was this verbose in passing my comments on to Netflix. I was pleased that they opted for profiles, but was disappointed by how cumbersome they were to manage. Placing all profile management in a single page view would have gone far in making them easier to use.

    I guess I'm disappointed to see Netflix throw out the baby with the bathwater, but they can see that users like me have stopped using the profiles. It reaches a point where the amount of developer support hours and system maintenance tasks invested in a minimally used feature necessitates a pause to rethink the strategy. Hopefully we will see an improved queue management system in the future.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  41. What to say when you cant say ooops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone DID crack the Netflix database:

    http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~shmat/shmat_oak08netflix.pdf

  42. This is my reply to Netflix which I posted to them by Bazzible · · Score: 1

    On 1 September you plan on removing the sub accounts, I want to voice our families opinion on this and Remind you that we are the customer, and making it convenient for your Programmers to update code at the expense of your "CUSTOMERS" is unacceptable. If NETFLIX does indeed remove this feature, we will voice our concerns the only way that will matter to you. We will unsubscribe from your service as I am sure may others will do. So until September 1st.... Your current customer.

  43. "It's easy" vs. "It just works" by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is the iPod successful? It just works.

    Netflix Profiles "just works". I have my queue of 150+ movies, and without further effort the movies I want show up in the order I want, one at a time; ditto for my wife, who being home more than I am gets two a at a time. NO EFFORT.

    Now you, and Netflix, pull the "quit whining, it's EASY to get the same thing, just go reshuffle the mutual queue..." without realizing that now that we've _made_ our lists (over 300 movies total), now we have to go _update_ that list every day. That doesn't "just work", that takes constant fiddling when we've got plenty of other things to do.

    On top of that, our wildly different tastes (sappy chick flix vs. sci-fi noir & grusome action) means that the "suggestions" tool is useless. One of us gets on to review suggestions, and half the stuff suggested will be undesirable (never mind any bizzare half-breed "because you liked '27 Dresses' and 'Akira'...").

    Profiles worked. It's extremely useful to some customers. Fix the code; don't wreck the customer experience.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:"It's easy" vs. "It just works" by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      I agree it sucks to lose this feature.

      But the answer for you is to go make a separate account. Considering all the little nuances about your family's renting habits, that convenience HAS to be worth the potential $1/month extra it will cost you.

      Sadly you can't preserve is your ratings and recommendations, so that part kind of sucks.

    2. Re:"It's easy" vs. "It just works" by IceFox · · Score: 1

      The first part yes, the second part kinda. A number of the new recommendation algorthms such as pearsons (an implemention of it I have coded here http://icefox.net/programs/?program=NetflixRecommenderFramework) can deal with two seperate personalities sharing the same account. I am not justifing the actions just saying that the new algo's kick the old netflix one and they can actually deal with this problem reasonable well while before they couldn't.

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    3. Re:"It's easy" vs. "It just works" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get 3 out at a time. Two for my husbands queue, one for mine. Seperate accounts:

      $8.99 a month for 1 out unlimited
      $13.99 a month for 2 out unlimited
      = $22.98 a month for seperate plans

      vs

      $16.99 a month for one plan currently

      Thats six extra bucks a month or micro-managing the queue so that my husband and I both get what we want. Goodbye Netflix, hello being able to pick out movies at the local Blockbuster.

    4. Re:"It's easy" vs. "It just works" by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      iPod is a bad example. Reed Hastings is on the board of Microsoft, a company known for eliminating features customers want.

  44. Does Blockbuster offer profiles? by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know if Blockbuster's movie-rental-by-mail program offers separate queues?

    1. Re:Does Blockbuster offer profiles? by Garc · · Score: 4, Informative

      They do not. The profile is the reason my family switched back to netflix after leaving them for Blockbuster.

  45. Ask slashdot tag??? more like rantslashdot tag... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    So, someone is unhappy with the modification of a service in a site... shit ScreenSelect got bought by lovefilm and the service sucks [about 2 years ago]... did I posted a story on slashdot ranting about it?? no, I just stopped using the service...

    seriously

    rantslashdot

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  46. Alternative queuing methods by digid · · Score: 1

    I can see the reason to get rid of profiles(to get people who are friends doubling up on one account when they could each have their own) but I highly doubt they are completely ridding themselves of preferred queuing. Virtual queuing can be done in one profile via different methods. You could have a single profile with tagged movies. Imagine you could tag a movie saying this one's for me and this one the whole family will love. The profile could then be configured to prioritize the way movies are shipped out based on tags.

    1. Re:Alternative queuing methods by DrOct · · Score: 1

      That seems like a lot of extra work for the customer to get at best partial functionality. I don't know about you but I have hundreds of movies in my queue, I wouldn't want to go through and tag each one with who it's for, just so I could get some of that functionality back.

  47. Overhead by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1

    it takes about five seconds to drag and drop a movie in the queue

    That's if you've got your Netflix queue up.
    Which is if you've gone to the Netflix page.
    Which is if you've interrupted whatever else you were doing on-line.
    Which is if you've got the computer turned on and browser started.
    Which is if you've stopped doing something else to do all the above.
    Which is if you've realized you just sent something back and need to adjust what comes next when Netflix receives it.
    Which is if you've realized that the other queue-user either won't like what's up next or has already done the above to trump your choice.
    Which is if you've got the inclination to coordinate the delivery of several hundred queue contents.
    Which is if you've decided to even keep the Netflix account after the wonderful tool, that saved you from even having to think about any of the above, was abruptly canceled and now you have to go from "no effort" to "daily fiddling & aggrivation".

    Profiles is good. It works. Leave it alone; I've got a lot of other "5-second" tasks to fill not enough time.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:Overhead by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Well you know, it seems to me that if you people like them you are bitch'n at the wrong people. Write to netflix and tell them how you feel. Enough people bitch then they might change their mind.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  48. Duh by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course the suggestion system doesn't work for you: trying to generate suggestions from a hodgepodge of two different peoples' tastes doesn't work.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  49. Won't this mess up their recomendation system? by DrOct · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Netflix is pretty obsessed with improving their recommendation system (or at least they act like they are with their prize and such). Won't this make that significantly more difficult? Sure a few people who use this feature will get separate accounts, but I'd be willing to bet the majority will either cancel or just make due with one account. Suddenly having 2 or 3 or more people's queues merged is going to make it a lot more difficult to figure out what individual people actually want and like.

    1. Re:Won't this mess up their recomendation system? by person_man01 · · Score: 1

      DITTO!! Suddenly all the effort into accurate recommendations become pointless when family members with different tastes are all consolidated to one profile. It will not be targeted correctly, and so to whoever sees the recommendation, it's as good as random, if it's not one based on their movie interest!

  50. A DIFFERENT way to improve their interface by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    Netflix drives me NUTS.

    I can't find things without a lot of work, and I can NEVER be sure I've found everything. This, frankly, makes me mad.

    Let's say you want a comedy from Thailand. You can search for Thai, you can search for Thailand, but if you search for both, it gives you all comedies AND all Thai movies. WELL THAT'S HELPFUL.

    What about running time? I want a short movie. Nope. I want a G-rated movie. Nope. I want a movie that was added to their stock since April 8th, since that's the last time I checked all the new Thai comedies they got. Nope. I want an animated film in black and white. No way. I want to see only films which are not and have never been in my queue. Ha Ha! No.

    Advanced search.

    How long has their website been up and used, and yet still no advanced search? Long enough to mean it's not a "getting around to it" thing.

    While it's not trivial to implement, it's not that hard, and they've had plenty of time to do it and yet they haven't done it.

    It's clearly a business decision. They don't WANT us to be able to find what we want. They want us to follow a tree of behavior so they can predict usage/copies to own. They put us in a maze with a little cheese at the end and make US do the work.

    This pisses me off.
    This makes me angry.

    The less able to find what I want I am, the less enthusiastic I am about Netflix, the longer the movies I do get languish, because I'm settling, rather than getting what I want, and HEY! the happier Netflix is.

    Bastards.

    1. Re:A DIFFERENT way to improve their interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, unhappy person: Unsubscribe, already.

    2. Re:A DIFFERENT way to improve their interface by Gideon777 · · Score: 1

      The example you give is like shopping for a TV at Best Buy. On the day you intend to you buy it. There's really better ways to do your research.

      Of course the medium of selling/shipping is going to try to steer people in a certain direction. This isn't diabolical, it's capitalistic. These are human rights violations, they're movies. People went to see Speed Racer, so it's not like we have an aesthetic superiority to appeal to either.

      There are better places to do research. IMDB. Metacritic. Yahoo movies. Google, even. These provide some great insight into niche films as well as the blockbusters.

      Now obviously if Netflix wants to set itself apart from other mail-ordering movie sites, they need to continue to implement better recommendations, reinstitute better multiple queues, and obviously add excellent advanced search. But, when it comes down to what they're built to do, which is ship movies, they do it. Do they have the best interface possible? No. Does it get us our movies? Yes. They just need to be better at helping us find the movies we want to get.

    3. Re:A DIFFERENT way to improve their interface by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      There's only a limited amount of search they can offer. They're not in the business of picking out each and every category you could possibly apply to a movie (shot with exactly 2 cameras, filmed on location in the southern hemisphere, less than 3 curse words spoken per hour, no mention of real-world politicians).

      If you want to find movies to rent, go to some site that specializes in really granular movie categorization. Once you find them, look for them on Netflix. If Netflix doesn't have them, write their customer service asking to stock that movie, or pick a different movie from your list.

    4. Re:A DIFFERENT way to improve their interface by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      I agree that it would be nice if Netflix had a more robust database that could be queried by users. I offer this suggestion as a possible partial workaround, as the movies in the IMDB are do not coincide with the films inventoried by Netflix. The advanced option costs money, but at least the option exists.

      Have you considered imdb's regular search page or their keyword search (click in the "Areas to Search" sidebar)?

      My guess is that a Pro membership will allow you to boolean your searches.

      Good luck and hope this helps.

      --
      blog
    5. Re:A DIFFERENT way to improve their interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, sorry, he's not asking for all that. He's asking for a smarter search. The Netflix search feature is very primitive. You have a good idea to search another site though, but it would be easier to actually search from Netflix' available movies.

  51. Problem: recommendations by Insightfill · · Score: 1, Funny
    In our house, my wife, I and my children each have 'sub-accounts'. Recommendations from Netflix have been pretty intelligent. Under the new plan, all of our viewing habits will be lumped together, with the result that we'll start getting recommendations for hospital drama/scifi/children shows. What will that leave us? Poor recommendations. Darn: it was just starting to flush out the children recommendations from my sub-account from way back a long time ago when they were combined.

    Well, at least my Tivo doesn't think I'm gay.

  52. never used it, but it's stupid to get rid of it by TheAngryIntern · · Score: 1

    I honestly didn't know the feature existed until today when I read the news that they were getting rid of profiles. It's always just been me on my Netflix account so I never had a need for profiles, but for couples and families I can see how this would be a great feature. I'm sure most of the commenters I've seen so far are right: NF is betting that most people will open a 2nd account and therefore give them more money. It's pretty shady of NF to do this. If I actually used the feature I would definitely cancel my account.

  53. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not trying to troll here, but do people actually still go through all the trouble of ordering rental movies, waiting several days for the movies to arrive, and after watching packaging them again and sending them back? It's been so long since the last time rented an actual physical disc that I can't even remember.

    I never buy anything digitally though (not talking about renting here), because owning and/or having a license to a file on my computer doesn't feel like owning a product at all. Also, it's way too easy to lose a digital file. Whenever I buy something, I want a physical disc, be it program/game, movie or music. But even then I don't use the discs for anything, I usually don't even open the plastic wraps. I go to the internet, find an "official" scene release, use/watch/listen to that instead, and I don't feel bad about it because I own the original. In many cases the scene releases are already in a format I would convert the originals to anyway, so I don't have to go through all the trouble of converting everything myself, finding the optimal quality settings etc.

    In the end, I never really touch the discs at all anymore, even though I want to have them. Maybe I'm just crazy? :)

  54. Re:The ONLY reason I would have switched to Netfli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then we wouldn't get 10 romantic comedies in a row or 10 action movies. Ah well.

    ...Does Blockbuster make you powerless to interleave romantic comedies and action movies?
  55. DRM by jswinth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My guess would be that this is DRM related. It probably became very difficult to limit or explain the limit per account. When little Johnny with a separate profile installed the Watch Now feature on 5 of his friends' computers then Dad would be upset with Netflix when he called up trying to make his new Roku work. Or worse, the profiles where allowing people to get around the Watch Now limits. I don't know what the limits are but you can bet that the movie studios require them. With Netflix's push into streamed content, anything that gets in the way is likely to be cannibalized.

    1. Re:DRM by LinuxIsStillBetter · · Score: 1
      There used to be a limit of n hours per month (where n was about 1 hour of viewing per $1 spent per month), but they removed this restriction a while ago.

      There is still a non-revokable 8 computer license limit per account (http://www.hackingnetflix.com/2007/09/watch-now-limit.html)

      The main limit though, is the meager selection of available movies.

  56. Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had netflix back when they first offered the service (about 8 years ago). I was a loyal customer for over two years until they changed their pricing scheme one day. They wanted 35% more for fewer discs than were included in my previous plan. I asked their customer service department how they justified forcing me to pay more for fewer rentals. They responded by saying that they didn't care and I could leave if I didn't like it.....and so I did. I don't believe the company cares too much about long term user retention. Their customer base is growing quickly, and they don't seem bothered by existing users that are less than fully satisfied. This may not be a problem for them in the short term, but is not sustainable in the long term. Look at Sprint.....another company notorious for the service they provide to existing customers.

  57. I can tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so can anyone in a management position at the US Post Office. Netflix is about to cancel their contract with USPS. They're doing this because QUEUES AND DISCS IN THE MAIL ARE GOING AWAY, TOO. You'll get a Netflix set-top box and will essentially watch streaming video on your television. http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/05/review-roku-net.html

    1. Re:I can tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop spreading bullshit rumors kid

  58. My theory by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been a Netflix subscriber for over four years and I've never used the profiles. I never saw a reason for them. But, in reading through the threads here, apparently they are widely used. (Even though I still don't understand why.)

    Anyway, here's my theory. Netflix will bring the profiles back but charge a "nominal" fee each month for each profile. Like maybe 50 cents per month. Overtime the fee will be raised to actually increase Netflix's profits.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:My theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even though I still don't understand why"

      Then you haven't read the responses to your original comment. Nobody's arguing with your assertion that you can do this all by hand, but some people don't like spending time micro-managing DVD queues. I like to stock my multiple queues and let the system manage getting the right proportion from each (one for the kids, two for the grownups) to my mailbox. Moreover, the fact that you don't find recommendations useful surely can't make it impossible for you to see that others might find them useful; if my kids want to rate TMNT with four stars, that's their business, I don't want recommendations based on that.

    2. Re:My theory by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "some people don't like spending time micro-managing DVD queues."

      And like I replied already, it takes seconds to drag an drop movies in the queue. And as I've also replied previously, if you don't have mere seconds to do that, you probably don't have time to watch movies in the first place.

      "Moreover, the fact that you don't find recommendations useful surely can't make it impossible for you to see that others might find them useful"

      I must be small minded because I simply cannot imagine an intelligent adult relying on machine generated suggestions for movies. Don't you have actual friends to recommend movies to you? Can't you read movie reviews written from actual people?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:My theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And like I replied already, it takes seconds to drag an drop movies in the queue. And as I've also replied previously, if you don't have mere seconds to do that, you probably don't have time to watch movies in the first place."

      I'll happily stop watching movies for the rest of my life if you can show me just one place where I said I don't have time to micro-manage my Netflix queue. But I'm really surprised that you can't distinguish between "some small amount of time" and "no time at all," or agree that "no time at all" is more convenient than "some small amount of time." I do have the few seconds, it's true. Does that necessarily mean that I want to spend the few seconds on this particular task that has previously been taken care of for me? No.

      "I must be small minded because I simply cannot imagine an intelligent adult relying on machine generated suggestions for movies. Don't you have actual friends to recommend movies to you? Can't you read movie reviews written from actual people?"

      I do have actual friends, and I do accept recommendations from them. And I can and do read reviews written by actual people. What does either of these thing have to do with whether I also choose to pay attention to Netflix suggestions? Why should I limit myself to only the sources you prefer? Have the Netflix suggestions always been great? No. Have my friends' suggestions always been great? No. Neither have the written reviews. The cool thing is that I can take the advice or not. Eliminating profiles and mixing together all the reviews of the members of my household effectively eliminates one source of recommendations. How could that possibly be a good thing?

      I think maybe you're confused about what it means when someone says, "Here's why I use profiles." You seem to think that means, "Here's why everybody should use profiles." I don't care whether you use them or not. But don't pretend that I don't have good reasons for doing so. The fact that they don't apply to you is irrelevant.

  59. Any way to email complaints to Netflix? by lconover · · Score: 1

    I believe that 'the squeaky wheel gets the grease' - if Netflix hears from enough customers affected who truly love the profiles feature, they may reconsider killing it. Especially if those customers make it clear that they won't be ponying up for another subscription, and in fact, might reduce their subscription to a lower level.

    Anyone know of any way to email Netflix support?

    1. Re:Any way to email complaints to Netflix? by badlikeacobra · · Score: 1

      They have a blog post about the change with a string of angry comments. You could try leaving a comment there. It will probably do as much good as anything else.

    2. Re:Any way to email complaints to Netflix? by jlindsey · · Score: 1

      This is what I was looking for too. And what annoys me as well is that as a user of a secondary profile, I was in no way notified that my profile would be discontinued. There isn't even anything on the website or on my queue warning me that I'm about to lose it all. As far as I know, messages were only sent to the primary account holders.

    3. Re:Any way to email complaints to Netflix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.netflix.com/ContactPR

      I see it as a PR issue. Besides, it's the only NetFlix form I can find on the site.

    4. Re:Any way to email complaints to Netflix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  60. Re:The ONLY reason I would have switched to Netfli by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    Of course you can, and I was exaggerating, but it would be nice to have an equal share at all times. Plus, Blockbuster is rather bad at sending the movie at the top of the queue, even if it is "Available."

  61. And this is exactly why they are eliminating it. by essinger · · Score: 1

    This has been a life-saver for me; rather than having to remember what movies my wife wants to see, and having my movies held up when she takes a week to watch one, I can set her up with her on mini-queue and then not have to worry about it.


    Netflix actually loses money on accounts that return movies too quick. If eliminating profiles slows down the rate at which people return movies, then their margins go up. My guess is they found they weren't making any money off accounts that used profiles.
  62. The answer - 2% usage by scuba_steve_1 · · Score: 1

    Netflix claims that only 2% of their users utilize multiple queues...and they also state that maintaining them is a burden.

    2% usage? Man, I am consistently amazed at the ineptitude of the average consumer. This is a FANTASTIC feature...and I cannot imagine that the majority of Netflix customers who have more than one movie-watching individual in their household would not benefit.

    My wife and I use it for my teenage daughter. We have a separate "one movie" queue for her that allows her to select her own movies...and manage that movie without interfering with our queue. We are never stuck in line behind her and vice versa. We have also defined her queue such that she can only add movies rated between G and PG-13.

    I know other folks who use this feature so that husbands and wives (or boyfriends and girlfriends) have similar autonomy.

    My wife and I have contacted NetFlix. I have also signed the petition (http://www.petitiononline.com/netflix0/petition.html)...but frankly, if we are only 2% of the population and maintenance for some odd reason (poor implementation perhaps?) is onerous, it may be to their benefit to take their chances and see if we will really jump. Dang, I am just amazed that more people do not see the benefit of these queues...but then again, probably only 2% of people did not have a blinking 12:00 on their VCRs when that technology ruled the family room.

    Oh well, I really will go to Blockbuster if this occurs. The option of a brick and mortar rental for impulse viewing trumps NetFlix when they get rid of queues. I suppose NetFlix is focusing on online content delivery now...and they may just not care as much about silver disks at this point...even though they represent 99.99% of their business.

    1. Re:The answer - 2% usage by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      2% is ridiculously low but I'm not too surprised. They didn't exactly advertise the feature when I first set it up. I had to read some sort of FAQ to figure out how to set it up. Although, it was definitely a selling point for Netflix for me and it's one of the reasons I've stuck with them. Unless you're single, there's no reason you wouldn't want to have two or more queues.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:The answer - 2% usage by scuba_steve_1 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more...assuming that you have a plan with at least two disks at one time. It allows everyone to be happy...and avoids fights between siblings and/or partners.

      In fact, if NetFlix was smart, they would aggressively market this feature to motivate users to have a plan that has at least as many disks as the household has family members. I imagine that most NetFlix users don't see the need to have a plan that supports having more than 2 or 3 disks out at once...but if NetFlix marketed queues properly, a 5 member household might immediately see the need to upgrade to a 5 disk plan.

    3. Re:The answer - 2% usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, even if you're single. My single friends use them to separate TV series from movies.

    4. Re:The answer - 2% usage by bughunter · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't call it ineptitude, either. It's more like apathy and/or laziness.

      It takes some clicking and some data entry just to set up a secondary profile. Not a lot, but enough to create a barrier.

      Additionally, if a family is already sharing one queue, then it *is* a lot of work to distribute the primary queue entries among the secondary profile queues. This creates another disincentive to adding a secondary profile. Netflix doesn't have a tool for moving queues between profiles.

      They should have made one, however, before announcing this. I don't know a single netflix user who is happy about this.

      (I bet I will soon, however...)

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  63. My response to netflix... by FunkyELF · · Score: 1
    Disclaimer : I copied someone's "because you liked Saw II, we recommend Chicago" line from here.

    What the hell are married customers with two different tastes in movies supposed to do once you remove profiles? That was a big selling point for me and a couple of co-workers who I turned on to netflix. Will your recommendation system shit itself? If I like horror and my wife likes musicals will I start to see "Because you liked Saw II, we recommend Chicago?" This is utter crap that you're stopping this. It won't stop multiple households from using a single account either...good luck. This just looks like you're alienating your real customers.

    I'm paying $18.10 a month for you guys to drag your asses shipping me 3 DVDs a month. I know you do it on purpose too. It sometimes takes a full week to get a movie after I return one. Blockbuster's pricing is looking pretty good. I can get 3 at a time for $15.99 or I can get 2 at a time plus in-store exchanges for $16.99.

    Way to screw your customers for no good reason.

    Also, your silly Movies on demand stuff is worthless for multiple reasons. 1, you only put crappy movies on it, and 2, it only works with Windows...what are customers who use real operating systems like Linux, Mac OSX, or Solaris to do? I was looking for a reason to stop paying for Netflix after you made it clear you only cared about the moron customers who run Windows, you just gave me another reason.

    Goodbye Netflix.
  64. News to Me by cparker15 · · Score: 1

    I've never taken a solid look at Netflix as an option for movie rentals. Actually, I don't remember the last time I rented a movie, but that's beside the point.

    Having heard about this Profiles feature exclusively from this story, it sounds like a good reason to start renting movies. This story probably just advertised one of Netflix's best features. I'll bet Netflix will reverse this decision. Who knows? It could have been a strategic move. If Netflix does reverse the decision, I know I'll probably end up being a new customer just to make use of this feature (it would beat buying new movies, and our library runneth over, so we're running out of places to put the DVDs).

    I really can't imagine a software department of a big corporation whining that something is too hard to implement or maintain.

    --
    Have you driven a fnord... lately?

    You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

  65. Seconds add up, and it's a lot more than you think by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    My guess is that you are single.

    I cannot understand how you cannot grasp why this matters.

    I set up a queue, and then do not touch the Netflix website for months at a time. I have over 20 movies in my queue right now for example.

    With profiles, my wife and I could have the same arrangement for each profile. We just set up our queues, and then don't think about it for months on end.

    Now it might take only a few seconds to go and change the queue - but with no profiles we'll have to check the queue EVERY SINGLE TIME WE SEND BACK A MOVIE. It might take only a "few seconds" to reorder the queue. but it takes longer than than to go to a computer, fire up a browser, and go to Netflix to spend the few seconds. Even worse, you must remember to do this EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU SEND BACK A MOVIE.

    What if every time you wanted to start your car, you had to sprint fifty feet away, press a series of buttons, then sprint back to your car? That would also only take a few seconds. Yet it would be annoying as hell. And for those of us who have figured out to have automation remove an area of attention in our lives, it's really annoying to think that we'll have to start constantly thinking about queue ordering EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU SEND BACK A MOVIE. If I have to do that, I might as well just go to Blockbuster where I also have to think each time I want a movie.

    Another aspect you may not grasp is that two people watch movies at different rates. If we both watched movies with equal frequency we could, in theory, simply interleave placement in the queue. But this would not work as soon as one person sends back two movies while the other has not watched one.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  66. And it angers key customers by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I know I for one would recommend Netflix to anyone thinking about using it, because I really enjoyed features like Profiles.

    But if Netflix is going to take away anything that makes it different from other services, I see no reason to continue to recommend it.

    They may lose a lot more than just the smaller percentage of people that used this feature. They may lose a ton of future subscribers as people stop recommending them.

    Any business would kill to have customers that are a champion for what you sell. And now Netflix is stomping all over the people that helped grow the service to what it is today.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  67. The inside view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I used to work at Netflix. I can tell you that profiles are used by a vanishingly small percentage of the customer base (albeit I predict it will be a rather vocal percentage) and cause a painful "How does new feature X work with a profile?" diversion for just about every product management cycle. In the end, the cost:benefit ratio is just too high.

    1. Re:The inside view by LinuxIsStillBetter · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Netflix. I can tell you that profiles are used by a vanishingly small percentage of the customer base (albeit I predict it will be a rather vocal percentage) and cause a painful "How does new feature X work with a profile?" diversion for just about every product management cycle. In the end, the cost:benefit ratio is just too high. Hmmm. I wonder what it would take to come up with a perl/python/ruby/whatever front-end to netflix that would provide functionality comparable to netflix profiles. The main reason I entered a rating was to keep track of what movies I've already seen. If I have my own app on my PC, I don't need to pass that information to Netflix.

      They're treading on dangerous ground here....

  68. I don't think it's about maintenance costs. by freakmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the reduction of maintenance costs is minimal since the feature is already supported by their software & db. Keeping it going should be very small cost. Taking it out, in fact, will cost b/c they will have to test the changes to the system. Sounds to me like they want to encourage > 1 paying account per household, unfortunate.

  69. Come on, Apple by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hurry up and increase your library size, because I'm canceling my Netflix at the end of August.

  70. Recommendations for you both by quokkapox · · Score: 2, Funny
    • Little Shop of Horrors
    • Rocky Horror Picture Show
    • The Crow

    Should I keep going? Okay, I cheated and got The Crow from Google Sets :p

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  71. Reduced complexity? by porneL · · Score: 1

    * Sales department wants to see higher bars on 'accounts sold' chart

    * Reduced code complexity - get rid of cases where code has to look for sub-accounts within account. When you forget that account sometimes is 1 account, sometimes many accounts, bugs creep in. It must be awful for reporting and data mining.

    1. Re:Reduced complexity? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      * Reduced code complexity - get rid of cases where code has to look for sub-accounts within account. When you forget that account sometimes is 1 account, sometimes many accounts, bugs creep in. How the heck does software "forget"? Or are you saying it's too hard for a programmer to have a freakin' integer variable that called (say) CurrentSubqueue that lets him select the appropriate queue? You obviously don't program. This is trivial stuff. Their code may be a nightmare, but "remembering" which queue is being referenced is a no brainer.

      It must be awful for reporting and data mining. You're suggesting it's easier to get accurate and meaningful data about three people when they're all randomly pulling movies from the same queue than it is when they all have individual queues? You're completely daft.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Reduced complexity? by porneL · · Score: 1

      are you saying it's too hard for a programmer to have a freakin' integer variable that called (say) CurrentSubqueue
      Yes. Simpler code has less opportunities for bugs. If you have 500 places where you have to use such variable and use it only in 499, you've got a bug. "Hello World" is trivial. In everything else you need to care about reducing complexity and preventing errors to avoid ending up with unmaintainable buggy code.

      You're suggesting it's easier to get accurate and meaningful data about three people when they're all randomly pulling movies from the same queue
      No, I had in mind that it might be easier to get data about an account when it's always an account, not account-or-three.

      You're completely daft.
      Thanks for enlightening me.
  72. Immediate impact on my use by wangerx · · Score: 1

    This announcement has had an immediate impact on my use of the service. I got notice this morning that they received my returns and that I could rate the returned selections. I cringed (in anger) and figured rating them would be completely pointless. There is no way their suggestion feature will even come close with three profiles rolled into one. The signal-to-noise ratio will be pathetic with the induced noise from my wife and kids profiles.

    "Fix" one part of the service and break another. Oh, and piss off your customers too.

    Perhaps some miracle movie selection algorithm has evolved from their netflix prize contest, requiring all movie ratings be rolled into one profile. (Yeah, right.)

    Motivated by money? Surely. Careless with greed? Likely.

  73. Expensive telcos by mrslacker · · Score: 1

    Just changed from $55 analog cable to $30 digital cable myself (TWC both times). Oh, and ditched AT&T DSL + Phone and got those from TWC too. That's $40/month saving.

    As for the Netflix thing, I didn't even know the profiles thing exist, and would not likely have used it had I done so. I suspect that apart from getting people to have multiple accounts, there's some other as yet unguessed feature they'll roll out. We'll see - I still think that 6-7 DVDs/month + unlimited online viewing (even if it doesn't work in Linux, grrr) for $9.60 is exceptional value.

    1. Re:Expensive telcos by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get the Roku box that lets you watch Online Viewing on your TV. It's fantastic. I was using a desktop hooked up to my 52" Samsung LCD to watch Dexter and Law and Order via DVI. With two Roku boxes (one in the bedroom, one in the living room), I rarely watch cable anymore. Netflix: $15/month, Comcast: $65/month. The choice isn't that difficult. Supposedly, Roku will be partnering with Hulu as well to get additional content to the boxes.

    2. Re:Expensive telcos by mrslacker · · Score: 1

      Probably will eventually. I just spent $60 on my MythTV box to get it handle digital + HD, and not flush with cash this month (and its HDD is about to die, so that needs to be replaced first).

      I'm not the biggest fan of DRM (see many previous threads) like most here, and I'd prefer that my Linux box handle it directly - the Netflix movies themselves are just standard WMV files if you can strip the DRM (time consuming, and no longer seems to work).

      No, I don't watch that much actual television either, although seeing various documentaries in HD is great stuff.

    3. Re:Expensive telcos by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Planet Earth in HD is an amazing show.

    4. Re:Expensive telcos by schwaang · · Score: 1

      Last night I went to watch something on Netflix (on my desktop) and got a "sorry, maintenance downtime" message. This was like 11pm pacific. It made me wonder if the Roku would have been affected.

  74. re:yes, i received the same notice by ed.han · · Score: 1

    what i'm failing to understand here is what maintenance costs are there to be reduced? i mean, the code's already written, it's been developed & deployed...so what costs do multiple profiles impose?

    ed

  75. my anecdotal $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    There are so many flaming posts here about how much netflix sucks and how many features it lacks, etc. etc. etc.

    My wife and I have been using netflix since December of 2002. We both share the same queue, and have slightly different tastes in movies. We have not had a single problem or complaint about netflix since day one (except for 2 or 3 bad discs out of 400+). We have over 200 movies in our queue at any given moment. Every few weeks we log in and do a little rearranging to make sure we don't get a big block of serious films or something. Other than that: zero problems. We've never even considered using any of the extraneous features on the site, who needs the hassle of learning all that crap?

    Are we alone here?

    1. Re:my anecdotal $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're not alone. I'm pretty happy with Netflix, too--right now. But I do use the profiles feature, and I'll definitely look into switching if they follow through on this "final" decision. The "hassle of learning all that crap" was a one-time cost that saves me having to even think about my queues except every couple of months without having to deal with receiving a handful of kids' movies and nothing for the grownups to watch. It's great that the system works well for some people without the extra features, but I'm really surprised how "useless" those who don't use the feature find it. Do I think everybody would benefit from profiles? Of course not (although the posts above indicate that many who hadn't known of the feature immediately see a use for it), but that simply *can't* lead one to conclude that they're not useful to anybody.

    2. Re:my anecdotal $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who needs the hassle of learning all that crap?"

      Cuz counting to five to rate movies when the starts are directly under every movie listing on every UI on every page presented is HARD. I can't count to 5, boo-hoo.

      How do people like you even get online?

    3. Re:my anecdotal $0.02 by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      "How do people like you even get online?"

      The same way you do:

      1) go to school nurse
      2) get excuse pass from phys-ed due to my weight^D^D^D^D^D glandular problem
      3) stop by the cafeteria for some twinkies
      4) waddle down to the school computer room
      5) log in

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  76. Re:The ONLY reason I would have switched to Netfli by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Blockbuster is rather bad at sending the movie at the top of the queue, even if it is "Available."

    See, this is a big difference between Blockbuster and Netflix. I've been with Netflix for about a year on the 2-at-a-time plan, and have NEVER gotten anything but the movie at the top of the queue. True, I don't often put major recent movies on my queue, so those might get bumped occasionally. But a friend of mine was complaining that he had the full series of The Prisoner in his queue, and one of the discs had been at the top for months, claiming to be available but never getting shipped. This kind of thing just doesn't happen with Netflix.

    Personally, I didn't even know the Profiles feature existed. I control Netflix, and my husband is only here on weekends b/c of work, so I have to make sure we've got ST:TNG or BSG on the weekends to watch together and then I can watch House and Scrubs myself during the week. It hasn't been that hard to maintain the queue. If I never knew whether I'd be getting the video in the #1 or #2 spot, it'd be a lot harder.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  77. If this affects you, then call them by Change · · Score: 1

    If you're pissed about this like I am, then give them a call. Explain to them that you find this feature extremely useful (or even necessary for your continued use of their service) and the removal of the feature will likely result in you leaving their service. I called last night, and the CSR I spoke to said that she was upset about the removal of the feature as well, it was something she used.
    1-888-638-3549
    The FAQ entry about this is at http://www.netflix.com/Help?p_faqid=3962
    If you hit that link while logged into your Netflix account, it will show your customer ID, which you can enter while calling.

  78. Re:oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's enough to make me drink till I drive.

  79. Re:The ONLY reason I would have switched to Netfli by cpotoso · · Score: 1

    Then we wouldn't get 10 romantic comedies in a row or 10 action movies.
    Darn, you can now start enjoying the action movies you were trying to avoid :-)
  80. Multiple accounts? by scuba_steve_1 · · Score: 1

    Multiple accounts isn't working for me...or many others who use queues for their children. I can now create a profile for my child that only allows her to rent movies listed at a certain rating or below. NetFlix labels this attribute "maturity rating." A dedicated (more expensive) account for each child isn't cutting it for many of us...especially since it also gives the child access to account management settings.

  81. Call customer support (1-888-638-3549) by BiggerBadderBen · · Score: 1

    I just called and spoke to a very nice woman named Wendy. She seemed really worn down... The party line is that their customer base has grown so big that profiles aren't scaling very well and that they think they can provide faster service without this feature. I told her that they might not have the 'big customer base' problem much longer. Too bad, I've been really happy with this service til now, but this is one of the most bone-headed decisions I've seen in a while.

  82. Add another to the WTF Crowd? by wdavies · · Score: 1

    I was just about to post about this - this makes me FURIOUS. The profiles are a godsend - my wife and I have 3 queues, one for movies, one for a TV series we are watching and one for my trashy action tv series I watch.

    It was a nightmare to manage these before, as you constantly had to interleaf the TV shows. Frankly I have NO idea how it improves the Netflix Service - in fact it will make it worse I'd say, as they wont be able to predict what I will do so easily - as it stands I barely Queue anything now - I set up say Veronica Mars seasons, and leave it alone.

    So WHAT THE F*CK Netflix? Yes I'm using my real name, I am one PISSED off customer. I dont usually chose to threaten action, but if this goes through I am simply going to go to 2 movies at a time, because frankly,I cant be bothered to manage 3 simulatanously.

    Good job, hope your stock falls through the floor.

    Winton

  83. You're killin' me, Netflix... by ahow628 · · Score: 1

    September 1st, 2008: The day the movies died...

  84. call them , email them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If enough people complain they might change their mind

    I already email their customer service and investor relations

  85. There is an online petition to Netflix. by plasmasurfer · · Score: 0

    An online petition is already available, with signees agreeing to either move to a cheaper plan, put their account on hold, or cancel their accounts entirely. Netflix must be banking that the improvements to its web site will offset the ill will and lost subscribers that this news has engendered. Let's get our derrieres in gear and sign this petition. So far there are only 462 signatures collected. I'm sure that we can do better than that.

    --
    To spot the expert, pick the one who predicts the job will take the longest and cost the most.
  86. A shame by LihTox · · Score: 1

    This is a shame; I was just thinking the other day that such a feature would be useful, and here they go.

    They should consider doing one of two things:
    1) Keep the Profiles option, but charge a fee for it to recoup whatever added expense exists. Make it cheaper than getting two separate accounts, but not quite as expensive.
    2) Give a small discount when you have more than one account set up to the same address.

  87. Write to them to complain by greendoggg · · Score: 1

    I sent them some feedback saying I will miss the feature and hoping they'll reconsider. If enough people do the same, maybe they'll decide not to kill it.

    To send them feedback, I followed the "contact us" link at the bottom of their homepage, went to "suggestions", and wrote them a quick, but polite, note about how I will miss this feature.

  88. Re:Netflix giveth... by bradyh · · Score: 1

    I gave my daughter her own queue for her birthday. And now Netflix is taking it away. Good thing I didn't get her a pony or Netflix would probably come shoot it in the head.

    But seriously, 1%? Most of the people I know use these things to separate their queue from their significant other or their kids. The 1% number makes no sense.

  89. Profiles aren't just useful for families. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live alone, but I maintain 3 profiles. One for TV shows, 1 for movies, and 1 for the occasional house-guest to use. Typically, I have it set so I have 2 TV show discs and 1 movie disc at a time but it fluctuates based on my mood. I only turn on the house-guest account when someone's going to visit, and it's been extremely convenient to offer them a way to log in, browse the selection and choose their own movies without messing up my queues.

    I don't rent enough to justify a second account. To me, the benefits of the profiles are huge. So much so, that I'd be willing to pay a few extra bucks a month to keep it.

  90. add comments to the Netflix blog post by IronyChef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even though they've said the decision is final, I suggest commenting directly on the Netflix blog post as hundreds of others are doing...

  91. online petition here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  92. Didn't work that well anyway by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

    I have Netflix and I use a second profile to partition my queue by movie genre. I have to say, I cheered when the feature was introduced, but it was never well implemented. Switching from the alt back to the main account, I have to reenter my password. There's no way to send movies from one queue to the other. It's basically a whole second account that is loosely tied to my main account.

    If killing off this half-baked feature makes it possible for Netflix to come back in 6 or 9 months with a replacement DONE RIGHT, then I'd call it a big win for all concerned.

    1. Re:Didn't work that well anyway by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      So... you had two profiles both for yourself? You're doing it wrong.

      It's basically a whole second account that is loosely tied to my main account.

      Careful! You may have another flash of the blindingly obvious if you keep thinking!

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    2. Re:Didn't work that well anyway by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'm doing it wrong. If you wanted to make sure that one of your (n) Netflix movies was always an adventure title, how better would you do it than assign one slot to another profile and populate its queue with all your adventure picks?

  93. (Official "Wah, me too" post) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was blown away when I got the email about this feature being removed... It's such a great feature, why remove it?! Are there patents on queuing or something?

    I love that feature! Arg.

  94. I was wrong about the whole thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to improve the Netflix website for all our customers.
    Since I won't be a customer after I cancel my account, technically they aren't lying to me. They should have also put in a line about the $17/month that they are going to save me. And think of all the extra free time I will have because I won't be occupied with watching movies and adding to my queue. Gosh, Netflix, you're so swell that I think I'm going to wet myself.
  95. My new theory... by TimothyDavis · · Score: 1

    ...is that this is a PR stunt (advertising without spending money).

    When looking through the data for the Netflix Challenge http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netflix_Prize, it has become apparent that many of the userIDs are more than one user. The same person who is watching horror films is probably not the same person renting the Teletubbies.

    By "taking away" (wink wink) the feature, and having tons of people freak out about how a cool feature is being removed - Netflix gets free advertising.

    Outcome? More people use the feature.

    1. Re:My new theory... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Leaving a bad taste in the mouths of your current customers is not good advertising. "Netflix is removing a useful feature" is not going to gain them a single new customer, and it will cause some customers who were already on the edge to cancel.

  96. Tell THEM about it! by binarybum · · Score: 1

    The only way Netflix can get away with such a downgrade in service is that they've calculated the number of people that actually utilize that service and use that number to estimate the impact on general customer satisfaction and attrition - apparently it is a small percentage of users that employ multiple profiles. This is not surprising, most users probably have no idea how to set up multiple profiles and may be intimated by the added layer of complexity. The /. cohort represents a heavily biased but likely very small proportion of power-users that enjoy the profiles feature (I sure do!/did). There are a lot of insightful comments on this post, but I wonder if we're also taking the time to be as (if not more) outspoken where it matters. We're clearly a small cog in the Netflix machine, but perhaps if we squeak loudly enough we'll garner some attention.

    --
    ôó
    1. Re:Tell THEM about it! by Tronster · · Score: 1

      Agreed.... just called them this morning and told them my displeasure with eliminating profiles.

      One interesting point to me was that the customer service rep pointed out to me was that profile picks are not kept seperately when performing suggestions. I am a bit disappointed in this, but even more shocked I didn't realize it when I received suggestions. (I'm told this frequently is masked by people not-showing movie genre's they don't typically watch.)

    2. Re:Tell THEM about it! by binarybum · · Score: 1

      That is both surprising and dissapointing. Fortunately the person i share an account with does not do much rating so i still get plenty of suggestions about samurai movies, anime, and surrealist cinema. Since the rating and suggestion system is one of my favorite features of netflix, and I'm not willing to either purchase a completely separate account that would hardly get used or to risk diluting the quality of my suggestions by ratings from the person i share the account with (I've spent the time to rate nearly 1000 films, and I feel that I am able to put quite a bit of trust into the output of the algorithm at this point), I wonder if there is a separate online (perhaps free) service that simply makes suggestions based on user ratings (not a rental service per-se)?

      --
      ôó
  97. How to write or phone NetFlix by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    You can also call us at 1-877-638-3549 so that we may assist you. We can be reached 7 days a week. We can be reached 7 days a week from 7:00 AM to 12:00 AM Eastern Time.

    Have your customer number handy. There is a "click here" link to get it at the bottom of the NetFlix page.



    We can write a paper letter to:

    NetFlix
    100 Winchester Circle
    Los Gatos CA 95032

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  98. Mad at Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been a netflix subscriber since 99 (yes I have been paying them monthly for 9 years... scary) and I have never been this pissed.

    I have my queue, my wife has hers and my kids have another. All of us are very upset. My wife was able to manage her own movies and get new ones when necessary, I wasn't continually bugged by my kids to watch a movie I was holding on to, so that they could get the next kids movie they wanted, and I was able to rate my movies without worrying that it would influence the suggestions for the others.

    This is a HUGE failure in customer service for netflix, and I have never considered leaving before. Their service will be so much less functional for us in the future. We will be back to the old days, which admittedly were good then, but this will be a feature we will really miss.

    Really mad at Netflix.

  99. Never heard of this feature by pudding7 · · Score: 1

    Geez, I didn't even know this feature was an option. I wish I had, it would have been nice to have my wife get her own queue so I didn't constantly get a copy of Desperate Housewives - Season 1 when I was expecting to watch Firefly for the 89th time.

  100. Alternative way to handle profiles by bnelsonsl · · Score: 1
    Netflix should add a profile tag to the items in the queue. That way there's only one queue, but the items in the queue will be associated with different profiles. Something like this:

    Movie [Profile]
    Star Wars [Dad]
    27 Dresses [Mom]
    3:10 to Yuma [Dad]
    Nemo [Kid]
    ...

    When Netflix gets a movie back, it determines which profile that movie came from. It the ships out the next movie with that same profile. So when "Star Wars" comes back, the next movie to ship is "3:10 to Yuma".

    This doesn't solve the problem of all the recommendations being mixed together, but it does save the functionality of many people sharing the same queue.

  101. Re:And why is this a problem? by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    Netflix says unlimited in the number of times you can return the movie for a new one, but the speed of the post office puts a practical limitation on that. Where does Netflix commit to a turn around time they are not meeting?

    I think the more appropriate discussion is by how much are they delaying your TAT and is that a reasonable amount based on how fast you return and what you pay? Twenty four hours extra TAT when you are viewing 21 movies a month for $20 on a 3 a month plan seems reasonable to me. You are probably costing Netflix more than your monthly fee with post office and movie studio fees, not to mention their administrative costs.

    I have 2 a month agreement for $15 and I'm lucky if I get them returned fast enough to see 6 movies. I don't want to subsidize your movie addiction any more than I already do. And I appreciate Netflix gives me some queue and processing time priority over you when I do return movies, since I do it infrequently and I am such a good customer for them.

    What would be really interesting is if Netflix uses heavy renters to subsidize catalog balancing between its warehouses. Say Dallas has lots of 'Back to the Future' and The Valley needs more. When Mr Heavyrenter in The Valley rents 'Back to the Future' it gets sent from Dallas knowing that will slow Heavyrenter down, and it will get returned to The Valley warehouse.

  102. Just kill the queue altogether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean if they really wanted to provide the level of customer satisfaction this move is aiming for, why not go the whole 10 yards!

  103. I always thought... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    I always thought that the profiles feature was in preparation for Netflix to introduce video games and porn. maybe they have finally decided that they will never offer games and porn, so they are now discontinuing the code base.

  104. Scratched DVDs with Blockbuster (Netflix?) by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    I tried one of these deals with Blockbuster, and quit b/c of the extreme annoyance at missing the end of movies due to a scratch. Is everyone else having the same issues? I mean, that happened to me several times... and personally twice is too much. So i quit the service and won't go back until I find out some fool proof way things won't be scratched.

  105. Re:And why is this a problem? by lgw · · Score: 1

    You are probably costing Netflix more than your monthly fee with post office and movie studio fees, not to mention their administrative costs. Why would there be any movie studio fees, unless Netflix went out of their way to create a contract to owe them? Maybe for the new releases that Neflix burns themselves they might have agreed to pay a per-rental fee (as an alternative to just paying to buy the movie), but any DVD that Netflix buys they can rent out all they want with no more money owed the studios.
    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  106. Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this many people are really upset over this and Netflix does not seem to care, tell them with your loudest possible voice: your money.

    I am not saying everyone should up and leave Netflix forever, but cancel it for a month or two. Maybe even use that time to try out a competitor you've wondered about.

    I'm sure even if only 1% of their users used this feature, if they all up and left for a month or two that would make a pretty loud statement.

  107. Sign the Petition! by abegosum · · Score: 1

    The same day as the notice, an internet petition to save the profiles feature has 900+ signatures! If you're pissed, add your name to the list:

    http://www.petitiononline.com/netflix0/petition.html

    Also, don't forget to send Netflix a personal "suggestion" letting them know just how upset you are by this supposed "improved customer experience:"

    http://www.netflix.com/Suggest?type=2&lnkctr=cu_suggest

  108. 1 Account, Multiple Queues by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I agree, it doesn't make sense to have multiple accounts when you really just want to have multiple queues.

    I'd love to setup 4 queues - Adult, Kid 1, Kid 2, and Just for me. There are discs my wife and I watch together, discs the younger and older kids each watch separately, and discs that only interest me. I'd love to set Queues 1,2 and 3 to round-robin upon return, and Queue 4 on hold until I manually release (when they go visit the in-laws I get to watch old movies and IMAX).

    The current implementation would have me signing in and out all the time so I just don't use it, but that means I need to sort my One Big Queue manually, which isn't a task that humans are better at than computers.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  109. http://www.savenetflixprofiles.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.savenetflixprofiles.com/

  110. Re:And why is this a problem? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    Your catalog balancing idea is interesting, but aren't the return addresses preprinted on the red envelopes? I sure think they are. (Obviously *your* address is on a sticky.)

  111. they suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, it shouldn't be hard to manage multiple "sub-accounts" anyone with any database knowledge could tell you that, it may take a couples extra miliseconds to pull from the database, but really loose the ugly interface (which slows it down more than any database) and you'll be golden, my "new releases" are almost always mostly old, I was on the fence to leave from this alone, I called customer service and they told me to look at other websites to find a movie then search for it on Netflix!!! haha I told them why don't I just find/rent elsewhere, and if this happens I guarantee I'll be going elsewhere, not sure if there is another option except BlockBuster, but hey I'll go to whoever wants to treat me as if they care about the customer!

  112. Y'all can't do basic math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CHEAPEST plan is the 1-at-a-time for $4.99. Your credit card will be billed for a higher amount if you use the other plans.

    You could argue that another plan is a better value but cheapest? Use common sense!

  113. Its not a bug its a feature! by ShadoeKnight · · Score: 1

    I used the profiles to set up 2 queues. 1 so I could rent movies and the other with 2 TV show discs at a time. That way I didn't have to do the constant interleaving of the movies and TV shows so I didn't accidentally get 4 movies or 4 TV discs at once. Now I'll have to constantly manage my queue again. Thanks, that's a real bonus. Its so bonusy that I may have to go to Blockbuster instead...

  114. WMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be happier if they made it so I could watch movies online with my Mac. Requiring Windows Media Player is a big disappointment since I can watch media on ComedyCentral.com, AdultSwim.com, Nick.com, and YouTube.

    But my wife is ticked about having to share a queue with me again.

  115. Petition by hoyosa · · Score: 1
  116. typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took the time to call them and the reason I was given was their weekly updates were taking 3-4 hours instead of 15-30 minutes. So basically they have shit code and rather than fix it, they're making the problem go away. NICE!

  117. Not a good sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My family will also suffer due to this change. We rent 4 at a time, with 4 separate queues. Yes, the rate of returns that varies among my family could be offset by manually adjusting the queue each time, but this inconvenience shouldn't even be happening.

              More importantly, and what many posters seem unable to grasp, is my 24 year old, my 15 year old, my wife, and I have widely varying tastes in movies. The recommendations will cease to be relevant, and yet this very feature is what they are offering a prize for improving.

              My suggestion? If they insist on forcing this change down our throats, lets force one down theirs: After the change occurs, continue to use the recommendation feature sparingly. BUT, even if it recommends a movie you decide to rent, and you enjoy it, give it the worst possible rating you can. This would trhow their recommendation system into total disarray, as they'd no longer be able to tout the accuracy of their all-important feature.

  118. Show Netflix how you really feel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show netflix and the world how you really feel! Spread the word!