Slashdot Mirror


California Lawmaker Wants to Ban Paper Receipts, Require Digital Ones (cnbc.com)

A California assemblyman has introduced a law barring retailers from printing paper receipts unless a customer requests one. Otherwise they'd be required to provide proof-or-purchase receipts "only in electronic form."

: An anonymous reader quotes CNBC: Stores that give out printed receipts without first being asked by the customer could be subject to fines [of $25 per day, up to $300 per year].... Proponents of the bill say the legislation would help reduce waste as well as contaminants in the recycling stream from toxins often used to coat the paper-based receipts... Up to 10 million trees and 21 billion gallons of water are used annually in the U.S. to create receipts, according to Green America, a green ecology organization. It said receipts annually generate 686 million pounds of waste and 12 billion pounds of carbon dioxide, or the equivalent of 1 million cars on the road...

Then again, the use of electronic receipts raises some privacy concerns since retailers usually require an email address for an electronic receipt and companies will then be able to potentially track and collect more data about customers.

If the bill passes, digital receipts would become California's default option on January 1, 2022.

300 comments

  1. Good ol Cali by bblb · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    California... where you shit in the street, find a state funded safehouse to shoot up, enter the country illegally and be protected, and knowingly give someone AIDS without any repercussions... but don't you dare use a plastic straw or a paper receipt.

    1. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second poster seems to have never been to the country. Let me tell you as a third party here, it is quite beautiful compared to the cities.

    2. Re:Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As compared to what, precisely? Your shithole red state where if you're not lilly-white and male you may as well just kill yourself? Where filthy air and filthy lead-laced water is YOUR problem, not the polluters, because CAPITALISM?
      Shut up, asshole. I'd rather put up with living here than in whatever hellhole you're posting from.

      Remember kids, always resort to name calling if you can't prove your point any other way.

    3. Re:Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you can just clean all that up using one of those free plastic bags you get at the grocery store.

      Ooops, they banned those in CA as well....

    4. Re:Good ol Cali by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was just in Florida, which isn't exactly liberal. They gave us paper straws with a drink because the plastic ones are banned by law (not sure if it's statewide or only local/county law). Nothing wrong with offering people a more environmentally friendly alternative by default, especially if the functionality is the same.

    5. Re: Good ol Cali by Whatsisname · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I've been to rural Arkansas and it was a litter filled shithole. I'll take the twin cities metro over that any day.

    6. Re: Good ol Cali by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      Yea welfare red states, that is funny considering 25% of the nation's homeless call California home.

    7. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldnt be a problem if we got back as much money that is paid into the federal government.

    8. Re:Good ol Cali by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Compared to a normal state AC.
      With clean streets with city laws enforced.
      No illegal migrants.
      No criminals wondering around doing crime.
      No open drug use.
      No homeless tent cities blocking city parks and pathways.
      A city that understands that a RV is not going to be parked for years blocking streets.
      No suggestions on employee cafeteria bans.
      No large amounts of city tax to pay to look after illegal migrants and random non US citizens.
      The ability to buy and sell with cash. To not have every sale stored by a company and looked over by a state and city government.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do, it's called the military industrial complex, largely located California. If you funded Calpers - already underfunded without ridiculous assumptions on rate of return, we'd be having to bail your sorry ass now now, instead of later when people expect to retire and find the well dry.
      Getting tired of hearing CA pulls more than its weight. Clean up the shit in the streets.
      Give us back the pension money of government workers who retired there.
      Suceed from the union, and see how it works when we pull our subsidies out.
      To quote a jerk who never had a real job - "you didn't build that".

    10. Re:Good ol Cali by careysub · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't worry, you can just clean all that up using one of those free plastic bags you get at the grocery store.

      Ooops, they banned those in CA as well....

      Which worked really, really well! With the success of that law, nine other states are currently planning on copying.

      As right-wingers love to lecture, nothing is "free", those "free" bags cost money, and since retail is a highly competitive, low margin business, those "free" bags had gotten so cr_ppy as to be almost worthless - requiring multiple bagging to hold anything of any weight, if they would even then.

      Now, if you need a bag, and don't want to pay $2 for one of those nice sewn waterproof fabric bags at the checkout counter that are indefinitely reusable, you can buy a disposable plastic bag for a dime. And that bag is so nice, being large and sturdy, that it can be reused indefinitely. Throwing away piles of flimsy one-use bags is a thing of the past.

      I would object strenuously if someone proposed going back. It is much better without those "free" bags.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    11. Re: Good ol Cali by jrumney · · Score: 3, Informative

      Paper straws instead of plastic is fine. But when the conversation in a shop goes: "do you want to sign up for our loyalty card"; "No" (I don't need more tracking, thanks); "OK, so what's your email address"; "Sorry? I said no"; "oh, I still need it, its for the receipt"... digital receipts are not about the environment I'm afraid.

    12. Re: Good ol Cali by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      My email is dontspam34EA550C@yahoo.com. So easy to create a burner account for receipts and other people who want to spam you.

    13. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to rural Arkansas and it's filled with beautiful lakes & forests. Where the hell did you go?

    14. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was when bubba was governor, it's pretty clean these days.

    15. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, heh, heh. I have a similar one. fuckyourspam@ on my server. I usually say "I'll write it out for you, it's pretty long." I either get laughs or a whole lot of blinking.

    16. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only time I've ever had to double bag is when I put sharp things in those bags, like pineapples. When I buy milk, I typically put it in those plastic bags, and they hold just fine. However, paper bags are prone to tearing because the condensation on the jug gets the bag wet.

    17. Re:Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California...where we have been carrying the rest of the country technologically, economically and creatively for decades.

      Here's an idea: How about you get off of your lazy, uncultured, uneducated, hick ass and start pulling your own weight. Sick and tired of funding destitute losers and nobodies like you.

    18. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's funny is how many places are "solving" their homeless problem with busing.

    19. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were people who came from one of your flyover states and couldn't cut it in California. Lazy and stupid people like you aren't welcome here.

    20. Re:Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California...where we have been carrying the rest of the country technologically, economically and creatively for decades.

      There has never been a single technology innovation to ever come out of California.

    21. Re:Good ol Cali by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I generate more paper waste every year from the amount of election and tax materials from the state than from the puny amount of receipts I guess. But this is typical politician fare - they have to do *something* so that during re-election they can say more than just what they voted for against.

    22. Re: Good ol Cali by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Hah, when I was in Arkansas, if you look between the trees you can see a bunch of rusting cars. Ok, maybe this isn't the "forest" but definitely just behind a few trees is someone's house with some old beater parked on the lawn, and this repeats over and over as you drive along and pay attention.

    23. Re:Good ol Cali by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I only paid for one bag, which I don't use much. Because I get tons of bags sent to me for free by various charities that I contributed to. Those grocery bags are the new tchotchkes to replace tote bags and pens.

      No wait, two bags. I had to buy one in europe when I went to get some groceries there. I still have that one too.

    24. Re: Good ol Cali by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      This is probably what killed Radio Shack finally. After an exchange like this I dumped the items I wanted to buy on the counter and walked out.

    25. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio Shack was asking for a phone number and physical address chainwide to buy batteries at least as far back as 1985, when they were still doing good business.

      They were done in by 1) surface mount manufacturing killing the demand for components and 2)responding to this by by changing their stores into just another generic cellphone retailer.

    26. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      admin@yahoo.com
      abuse@google.com
      info@hotmail.com

      Hey you're right, this is super easy!

    27. Re:Good ol Cali by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      Except there are a few problems with the bag ban.

      1. Homeless in San Francisco used those bags to poop in and tossed the waste; now they just poop on the street or are given free bags by the city.

      2. People don't wash the re-usable bags, so they built up bacteria and contaminants which cause people to get sick.

      3. People forget to bring the bags with them in the store, and instead buy the paper bags. Then they throw those away as well.

      4. The re-usable bags do break down. If you keep them in a clean dry place out of the sun, you can get about 5 years of use out of them. If you leave them in the back seat and the sun hits them, maybe 3 months. I used one as a sun shield, after less than 14 days it disintegrated when I touched it.

      In the end this ends up being more of a poor/stupid tax on those who can barely afford the prices at the local whole foods, or those who forget to bring a bag into the store with you. When this started in CA I would see people just throwing the items back in the cart and then unloading it all into their trunk.

    28. Re:Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet all of the cutting edge, multi-billion dollar, global tech companies are here...

      Sure thing, junior. Whatever you need to tell yourself to put off the realisation that you are a lazy, poor, pathetic loser living in an ugly, landlocked shithole surrounded by more poor, inbred people like you for another day.

    29. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who keeps receipts?

    30. Re: Good ol Cali by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Using a burner email for your receipts sounds like you dont want a receipt. Some of us do, asshole.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    31. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at a Canadian Radio Shack in 1975 and we asked for this info then! I honestly don't think it was used much then. If a customer was lucky then, they might have been sent a catalog.

    32. Re:Good ol Cali by zidium · · Score: 1

      Sounds like every city in Texas except Austin and parts of San Antonio.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    33. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd need to create a burner email account for each individual purchase to avoid being tracked. And you can't use your own domain because data mining will figure out that no one but you uses that domain.

      Plus the email provider will know exactly what you're buying as they'll be able to fully read your receipts (though to be fair they already do this with online purchases, so you're not losing too much here since you've already lost it). Grocery stories are bad at giving out this info so when you buy something from them, generally only they know what you bought. Email providers are already optomized for it, so now they'll know what you bought and they'll sell that information to the data curator companies.

    34. Re:Good ol Cali by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Ha! You think they banned plastic bags? They did no such thing.. You can still get plastic bags, you just have to pay $0.10 for each one (or bring your own). The $0.10 are mandated to be a certain thickness too. By the way, that thickness is significantly thicker than the average bags that were in use prior to the new law. So, more plastic in each bag...... The bags might last a bit longer, but they're still plastic and still prone to ripping.. So they go in the trash.. 100% of them will hit the trash at some point. More plastic in the landfills now...

    35. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? 'Cuz after the bag law I still saw a lot of plastic bag litter floating around SF. But now it was thicker, even-more-wasteful plastic bag litter.

    36. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them eat cake!

    37. Re:Good ol Cali by Kreela · · Score: 1

      Some countries have banned plastic bags outright. It tends to be the countries that receive exports of waste that lead on this, plus a lot of island nations. There's a map here summarising legislation in different countries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    38. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that address will still be used to track your purchases. Even if you create a burner for each retailer, your email provider will just sell it whole sale to advertisers, and because it's fricking obvious you're trying to hide your identity with so many burners, they'll sell the IP access logs with it. So advertisers will still be able to track you down.

      And for those of you who spout "VPN": Why should we have to resort to such extreme measures so just to keep a little of our privacy? Why is it that a corporations' desire to buy our personal data overrides our right to privacy? If your answer is: "Durr, tehy no it already..." or "My right to profit...." you need to go back to drawing board and try again. Whataboutism aside, Society is supposed to benefit everyone equally. Society is not supposed to enrich one person or group to the detriment of everyone else.

    39. Re: Good ol Cali by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Mine: roundfile@

      In the past I had it set to a 100k mailbox size limit and then sent myself a 99k attachment all but guaranteeing a bounce message going back to any spammers

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    40. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya is a utopia of no crime or drug use.

      Oh wait actually the drug abuse epidemic is mostly in the mid west
      https://www.newsweek.com/opioid-epidemic-us-midwest-bears-brunt-drugs-crisis-cdc-says-overdoses-triple-833862

      And has the crime to go along with it as the top 10 highest crime areas are all in the mid west
      https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/blog/25-most-dangerous-neighborhoods

      Nice fantasy you got there, maybe clean up your own neighborhood first huh?

    41. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Practice what you preach. Pay your fair share.

    42. Re: Good ol Cali by mpercy · · Score: 1

      Baltimore MD is in the Midwest? I'm gonna have to rethink my image of the country...

      4 of the top 10 worst and 5 of the top 25 neighborhoods listed in that link are in Baltimore...

    43. Re: Good ol Cali by mpercy · · Score: 1

      They always go to this. But California paying in more than they get back is not a BUG, it's a FEATURE of California being the home of many of millionaires and billionaires who are the targets of the high tax rates demanded by the progressives.

      "In January 2017, the California Legislative Analyst’s Office said by several measures California is, indeed, a donor state, but just barely. It receives $0.99 in federal expenditures per dollar of taxes paid."

      "The LAO also cites figures from a March 2016 report by the Pew Charitable Trusts. It found the federal government spent nearly $356 billion in California in fiscal year 2014, for salaries and wages, grants, contracts, retirement benefits and other benefits. That same year, California paid about $369 billion in total federal tax -- or about $13 billion more than it received -- according to the Internal Revenue Service Data Book, 2014.

      https://www.politifact.com/cal...

      Note that the averages are wildly skewed by the federal spending in Virginia and Maryland, which is basically the paychecks of all the federal employees in D.C.

    44. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any in CA? Didnâ(TM)t think so...

    45. Re:Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet all of the cutting edge, multi-billion dollar, global tech companies are here...

      Facts say otherwise faggot.

    46. Re:Good ol Cali by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      I was speaking to the situation in California after the GP tried to claim CA banned plastic bags.. They didn't.. They banned FREE plastic bags.

    47. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitch Hedberg, but only for donuts.

    48. Re:Good ol Cali by bblb · · Score: 1

      First off, shit for brains... I'm posting FROM CALIFORNIA. Second off, I'm black so you can take your lily white bullshit and shove it you race baiting fuckwit. Thirdly, I've lived in Florida, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Utah, Connecticut, and California in my lifetime and California is by far and away the dirtiest, most polluted, most overpopulated shithole I've ever lived in. Whether where I was up until last year in San Francisco or where I am now in LA, this state is corner to corner trash and I've never seen a larger homeless population than here... I've also never experienced more overt and widespread racism than I've experienced here in the supposed liberal paradise. You may love the filth but I'll take the supposedly racist south over this shithole any day of the week and can't wait for my contract to be up to get the fuck out of here.

    49. Re: Good ol Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOW DARE YOU quote fabricated statistics from those liars in Sakramento!!

  2. Law needs some privacy protections ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (1) Paper receipts should be required if the customer asks
    (2) Electronic receipts shouldn't require the customer to provide any information other than an email address ("burner" emails are easy to get).

    Of course, this is only a proposal -- lots of things get proposed in CA without many of them actually becoming law.

    1. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one is going to type out their email address just to get a receipt. Just attach it to the credit card itself, and if you pay with cash, you get a paper receipt. Require credit card companies to give you the option to opt out for that card and then you always get a paper receipt. Done.

    2. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about a third option for the privacy conscious? Display a QR code and a alphanumeric locator code on screen along with the store name, URL, total, and timestamp. A photo of this screen is the receipt. Entering the alpha locator into the store's site would bring up an itemized receipt able to be printed. The QR code itself could be used for returns and exchanges.

    3. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Any solution that involves a QR code is automatically garbage. Nobody scans QR codes. They're annoying, hard to use, half or more of the people don't understand them. And it would require ever store to be hooked up to the internet and record every sale. Not to mention anyone else standing nearby could capture the QR code. I can't begin to count how many ways this idea is idiotic.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by IcyWolfy · · Score: 2

      Stores already record every sale; it's almost required.
      And they need to be connected to the internet to even process a credit card.

      Hence the string of codes at the bottom with the date, transaction number, till number, etc; to prevent someone from returning the same item using a duplicate receipt. Or to go to the back office and search by credit card. Even the 4-employee store I worked at had such a basic entry-level system.

      One just needs to take a photo of a 2D barcode, whether it be a bar-code, a QR-code, or some other variant, it doesn't matter. It just needs to contain the batch/transaction/till number to identify the system. 99% of this already exists in most every POS system with integrated CC processing. The only lacking element is the ability to pull up from an insecure location.

    5. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides the privacy issue of stores getting your email (and then losing it in the inevitable data breach), it'll be pain it will be to wait in long line with everyone putting in their email. It holds up the line long enough with someone fiddling around for exact change or picking out which card they want you use or complaining about a coupon that expired three months ago; this is just one more thing holding up the day.

    6. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      If your goal is to eliminate recipts, so companies don't have to care about quality control- then this helps that goal.

    7. Re: Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But now Google will scan your photos and track your buying habits just as if you used Google Pay. They will write it into their TOS and few people will truly care.

    8. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      Electronic receipts shouldn't even touch the internet. They should be beamed via NFC, Bluetooth, Wifi Direct, etc. from the register to your phone.

    9. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      What if I'm not carrying a phone or its battery is dead? Email should be an option -- it also allows me to collect business receipts in one convenient place.

    10. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not good enough for the privacy conscious as the store will be able to track whoever looks up the digital receipt and can associate that with an IP or whatever other information they can grab on top of that. It allows for cash transactions to lose privacy.

    11. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      You can ask for a paper receipt, just like the article states.

    12. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a modern phone? Just make the camera gesture and point the camera at the QR code, and it'll automatically pop up the URL. No special app needed! (There is no step 2.)

      Welcome to 2019, gramps!

    13. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      All the necessary data could be encoded in the QR code, or transferred via NFC (which doesn't require the phone to give up any identifiers etc.)

      It would be better for stores too as they could include a signature to verify the transaction and prevent the creation of fake receipts. In practice they probably won't enforce it though, because "computer says no" is not good customer service.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      QR is OK, but not NFC. I don't trust that to be free of stupid, trivially fixed security holes that blow the system wide open. Taking a photo seems relatively safe. However, you'd need a pretty big QR code to actually encode the entire receipt.i like the idea of providing paper receipt on request, with a fee for failing to provide it. A big one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Considering many people are now using NFC for payment anyway, it seems like you might as well send a receipt over at the same time. Obviously if you wrapped your card in tinfoil then a paper receipt (that you can easily burn after reading) is probably best.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re: Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is a camera gesture.

    17. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It allows for cash transactions to lose privacy.

      Cash transactions can ask for a paper receipt.

    18. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For privacy to work, it needs to be the default. Otherwise, asking for privacy publicly simply marks you for suspicision. In this case, it also shames the poor.

    19. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Requiring to loop in a third party for all my transactions is utter madness.

      --
      Good-bye
    20. Re: Law needs some privacy protections ... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Typically motorola phones have motion gestures to enable some functions. If you twist your wrist twice quickly on a moto phone, it will turn on the camera. Another one is you can do a small chop motion twice to turn on the torch/flashlight. Its a really nice feature.

      --
      Good-bye
    21. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I have a new phone. Doesn't do that. If it did, I'd find an immediate way to disable it- what a fucking security nightmare.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    22. Re: Law needs some privacy protections ... by Albanach · · Score: 1

      The receipt needs to come in human readable and a structured machine readable format.

      If we had apps that could analyze everything we buy - especially if we had anonymous price sharing - we could then have apps that tell you where to shop to minimize cost.

      Imagine an app that says " here's your typical weekly shop". You should buy it from Acme this week. With the option to add things you buy less regularly and then get updated advice on which nearby shop is best value.

    23. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a retard.
      Email is INSTANT full take data surveillance and control over your life.
      Don't be fucking stupid.

      If you're dumbfuck enough to go digital,
      then at least display the receipt on a screen for YOU to have the CONTROL to photograph it for YOUR records and CONTROL, NOT theirs. Or stick in any random USB to receive same, however see BadUSB for why even that is a MISTAKE.

      All you fucking brilliant fucks keep enabling the State and Corporations over you.

      When in THE FUCK are you going to start enabling YOURSELVES over them?

    24. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STUPID.
      As above... You'd be TOTALLY TRACKED and datamined SURVEILLED and propagandized and controlled. And you could not use TOR or VPN because they'd block that too.
      Dumb shits.

    25. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Electronic receipts shouldn't even touch the internet. They should be beamed via NFC, Bluetooth, Wifi Direct, etc. from the register to your phone.

      Ew. I'm not opening up my phone to pick up whatever some strange cash register is carrying.

    26. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it should be required that everyone be provided with internet access and a device as well as secure private storage for their entire life.

    27. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Hm. I was nodding in agreement with you, then this thought hit me: Frequently, the only reason to look up a receipt afterwards is to process a refund or warranty where your privacy is already tossed out the window...

      and then I thought, "Why does this ever have to be a QR code? Just take a picture of what the actual receipt would look like, fully itemized. Makes it simpler for turning in receipts for reimbursement by your company.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    28. Re:Law needs some privacy protections ... by GaryBright · · Score: 1

      If they embed HTML into the receipt email they could get info on you just because you viewed the receipt even from a burner email, at least for normal people that aren't privacy wonks with custom settings. Turn off WiFi on your phone, pay in cash, don't let the cameras see your face clearly, get a paper receipt, or forgo the receipt. It will remain a challenge to avoid the corporate pimps treating us as data whores.

    29. Re: Law needs some privacy protections ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typically motorola phones have motion gestures to enable some functions. If you twist your wrist twice quickly on a moto phone, it will turn on the camera. Another one is you can do a small chop motion twice to turn on the torch/flashlight. Its a really nice feature.

      Can't do that. Physically disabled. Use RSI devices. A quick twist of my wrists would cause me immense pain.

      So try again yung-in

    30. Re: Law needs some privacy protections ... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you are getting at...I was describing something that exists and is widely enjoyed, to the point its starting to become an expected feature.

      --
      Good-bye
  3. As long as the government pays... by EzInKy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...for the iPhone and internet connection needed to go digital I'd go along with it.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:As long as the government pays... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can still get a paper receipt if you ask, and you don't actually need a phone to have a receipt emailed to you.

    2. Re:As long as the government pays... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now now... dont let facts and TFA get in the way of a good knee-jerk reaction.

      Hurr durr nutty librul californians are so stoopid omg!

    3. Re:As long as the government pays... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The customer shouldn't have to ask for a paper receipt, the merchant should ask. In fact, if this passes then the merchant should be required by law to ask.

    4. Re:As long as the government pays... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I think that's basically semantics. EIther the customer says "And I would like a paper receipt, please," or the clerk goes, "That'll be X dollars, do you want a paper receipt or email?"

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:As long as the government pays... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still get a paper receipt if you ask, and you don't actually need a phone to have a receipt emailed to you.

      Why would you need a phone for email?

      Some folks are happy to walk around unconnected, and can wait until they get to a desktop to "be online".

    6. Re:As long as the government pays... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Haven't you ever been required to show a receipt as you exit a store?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    7. Re:As long as the government pays... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So when they ask for a receipt as your walking out of a store you go home, print it out, and come back to show proof of purchase?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    8. Re:As long as the government pays... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Only membership clubs can 'require' it, and even then all they can do is revoke your membership. Regular retail stores have no power to force you to show your receipt after you have paid.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:As long as the government pays... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Is that the law in all states? I quit shopping at Best Buy for that very reason.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    10. Re:As long as the government pays... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Yes, very much so. A retail sale is a contract. Once you pay and receive a receipt, you are the owner of the property, full stop. Unless Best Buy is accusing you of a crime, they have no right to search your bags or look at your receipt. I want to caution you that too many people take this information to be an excuse to be an edgelord, please dont do that. When they ask me for a receipt i calmly but firmly walk by them. I dont yell or make a scene, i jsut go about my business and ignore anyone trying to examine my fully paid for and owned property.

      TL:DR - If you know you havent stolen anything, why would you stop and give them an opportunity to make an accusation?

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:As long as the government pays... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Easier for me was just quit shopping there.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  4. CVS receipts should be the first to be banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I got a five feet long receipt/coupon today.

    1. Re:CVS receipts should be the first to be banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!! That's the truth.

    2. Re:CVS receipts should be the first to be banned by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I know, it's not like anybody who hates their waste can shop elsewhere.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:CVS receipts should be the first to be banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I certainly do shop elsewhere. I only go to CVS/RiteAid as a last resort. Horrible customer experience not limited to the absurd receipts. Hopefully they will be the next to bite the dust after Sears.

  5. Alternative? by neonv · · Score: 1

    Ok, so they're going to force everyone to have a smart phone or laptop to bring to the store or other locations as proof of purchase?

    Do they think everyone has one or can afford to have one?

    Is that better than a small piece of paper, both recyclable and convenient?

    Is receipt waste a big issue in California?

    Are they really thinking this through?

    1. Re:Alternative? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      RTFA - paper receipts will still be legal, just not given by default. If you don't have a smartphone but have an e-receipt, you could probably still print it out (with some sort of QR code for authentication) to make a return.

    2. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cali politicos don't think things through. They react to any and all progressive left wing stimuli. Their only goal is not be MeToo'd out of office, not to be involved in any natural disasters, and definitely not holding the bag when Cali's economy craters due to high illegal immigration and dwindling tax base.

      The fact that anyone cares about paper receipts shows how little the elected reps give a crap about any real and important issues.

    3. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Ok, so they're going to force everyone to have a smart phone or laptop to bring to the store or other locations as proof of purchase?

      Do they think everyone has one or can afford to have one?

      Is that better than a small piece of paper, both recyclable and convenient?

      Is receipt waste a big issue in California?

      Are they really thinking this through?

      Paper is WAY more polluting than electronics. Because paper is non biodegrade and smart phones just recycle easily. I composted my iPad into my garden last year. I felt so Gaia. What a great idea!

      This bill brought to you by Apple Google. They can't wait to sell you LOTS of things to bring this in to compliance.

    4. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A blockchain for the e-tailers already requiring a customer login, with automatic purchase registration to the manufacturers registry for warranty and recalls. We would want to have a valid proof of purchase after the retailer goes under.

    6. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't about pollution, it's about privacy. Everything you purchase may soon be sent to your smartphone, where Google and other spy apps can siphon the data and send it back to the mothership.

      We want paper, because of privacy!

    7. Re:Alternative? by lsllll · · Score: 1

      RTFA - paper receipts will still be legal, just not given by default. If you don't have a smartphone but have an e-receipt, you could probably still print it out (with some sort of QR code for authentication) to make a return.

      And what about the burden it puts on small mom and pop shops, to have to send a digital receipt AND keep an electronic copy of the receipt (along with the backups, maintenance, etc of the data)? This is an extremely bad idea.

      --
      Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
    8. Re:Alternative? by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      All that burden already exists in order to accept CC transactions.

    9. Re:Alternative? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Mom and Pop stores are the LEAST of the problem. In Miami, at least, "Mom and Pop" neighborhood stores were using computers with cash register software and digital signature capture for credit card purchases YEARS before big companies like Walmart, Publix, and Blockbuster were.

      Why? A big company like Walmart, Publix, and Blockbuster has to make large-scale IT decisions that are nationwide in scope, require months of research and bureaucracy, and take lots of time to deploy. A small business owner says "fuck it", he's making one decision for himself, and if spending an extra $250 or so means he won't have to screw with paper receipts anymore when the credit card company does a chargeback on him, he'll spend it in an instant because it makes his life immeasurably easier. It's a lot easier for ten thousand small businesses to make ten thousand individually small decisions than it is for one very large company to make a very big decision that affects ten thousand locations.

    10. Re:Alternative? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      The quick answer to the last, given that it is the California State Legislature, is no, of course.

            Sacramento is like Mos Eisley - a wretched hive of scum and villainy.

    11. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, then I might as well just order from Amazon if they're going to make paying with cash the same as shopping online, fuck it, i'll stay home and get it delivered to my door. Fuck Cali.

    12. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CA's economy pays for your rambling inbred red state faggot act. You're welcome, poor toothless meth whores.

    13. Re:Alternative? by lsllll · · Score: 1

      Mom and Pop stores are the LEAST of the problem. In Miami, at least, "Mom and Pop" neighborhood stores were using computers with cash register software and digital signature capture for credit card purchases YEARS before big companies like Walmart, Publix, and Blockbuster were.

      Why? A big company like Walmart, Publix, and Blockbuster has to make large-scale IT decisions that are nationwide in scope, require months of research and bureaucracy, and take lots of time to deploy. A small business owner says "fuck it", he's making one decision for himself, and if spending an extra $250 or so means he won't have to screw with paper receipts anymore when the credit card company does a chargeback on him, he'll spend it in an instant because it makes his life immeasurably easier. It's a lot easier for ten thousand small businesses to make ten thousand individually small decisions than it is for one very large company to make a very big decision that affects ten thousand locations.

      Yeah, except the large companies are already doing shit like this. Every time I go to Home Depot, they ask me if I'd like an email receipt. Walmart doesn't (well, I don't shop there, but I've heard) ask because it'd just slow their process of making more money.

      And I don't buy your argument re: mom and pop shops being able to do this without any extra overhead (or as little as $250) because they already use computers to run their cash register. You're thinking of a "boutique" with millennial owners. When I go to the store in my town that repairs stained glass, they don't even use a register. They have carbon-copy paper receipts.

      The money "Walmart, Publix, Blockbuster" has to spend in order adhere to a law like this is miniscule as a percentage of their operating cost as it would be for a mom and pop shop. I don't know how you could argue that.

      --
      Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
    14. Re:Alternative? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I don't know how you could argue that.

      He wants it to be true, therefore it is his truth.
      This is where we fucking are now. Fuckers just make shit up (and yes, the fucker did just make shit up) and then argue how the world should change because his fucking lie is more important than facts.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    15. Re:Alternative? by the_povinator · · Score: 1
      Agreed, it's not thought through at all.

      There was a noticeably longer wait at places like Starbucks when they introduced those chip readers. Imagine what would happen if people had to say their email addresses.

      No, that's cocksucker seven eight nine then the number four spelled out at hotmail dot com

      --
      The .sig is dead, and I believe I had a hand in killing it.
    16. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you a Trump supporter? Isn't that like INCREDIBLY ironic for a Trump supporter to say? I mean off the scale? Bing bing, bong bong?

    17. Re:Alternative? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      It's minuscule as a percentage of their operating cost, but it's a HUGE amount of money in absolute terms. And mega corporations have a completely different set of priorities than small businesses. A large corporation will replace 75,000 24 month old laptops because their warranties expired and not think twice. A small business might have 5 laptops, each and every one of which is a different make & model. A mega corporation manages its computers remotely, using scripts and expensive utilities and management servers. A small business gets the owner's 17 year old son or daughter to reinstall Windows when somebody's laptop gets malware on it.

      There's a HUGE market for POS software for small businesses. And small businesses that DON'T use POS software (like my auto mechanic) use Square with an iPad or Android device.

      Small businesses are usually on the bleeding edge of technology, precisely BECAUSE running a small business requires that the owner wear multiple hats, be at least vaguely computer-literate if they want to function in the modern economy, and because there's no CIO and board of directors to either say "No" or demand a detailed 537-page strategy plan with multiple appendices comprehensively documenting its compliance with corporate governance standards, regulatory requirements, and everything else that's expected by large companies.

      The days of someone running a computer-free viable small business are rapidly coming to an end, mostly because the few who insist upon doing it are all approaching retirement age or death by now. Computers and small businesses aren't some new "Millennial" thing... small businesses have been using computers since the days of the Commodore 64 and Apple II (if not for POS, then for bookkeeping, scheduling, inventory-management, and supply ordering). Who do you think drove the MARKET for business software back in the 8-bit era? It sure as HELL wasn't large corporations like Sears... THEY had their expensive mainframes from IBM (which they didn't bother to start replacing until the 21st century, which is probably part of the reason why they're in the trouble they are now).

      It was small businesses who jumped on 8-bit computers, precisely because they WERE affordable, useful, and didn't require a priesthood of snotty gatekeepers to administer and manage. Computers and small businesses didn't start to become universal until well into the PC-era, but if you went back in time to 1989 and walked around an average strip mall, you would have found at least one computer in at LEAST half the small businesses at that strip mall... starting with the beauty salons and video rental stores (just to name two categories of small-business retail that ENTHUSIASTICALLY embraced computers almost from day one of the microcomputer era).

    18. Re:Alternative? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      There's no need for the government to get involved at all. Businesses will slowly transition to email because it's cheaper for them. If consumers hate it because it takes much longer to check out, then they will find some way to improve that experience, such as tying your email to your credit card or just switch over to mobile payments.

  6. Nearing the tipping point. by McFortner · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, the more I hear of stories like this out of California, the more I think Lex Luthor had the right idea in 1978 Superman movie.

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
    1. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Native Californian (San Diegan) here and I agree with you about the tipping point.

      There are a whole host of factors going on here. I don't think it's irreversable (the pendulum always swings back), but we're reaching a tipping point of absurdity no doubt. In no particular order, some of the causes might be:

      * Silicon Valley tax revenue flooding the state budget, allowing it to undertake expensive projects w/o much thought
      * Progressive Millennials sorting themselves out of the rest of the country and wanting to stay in urban areas more than usual
      * Gen-X and Boomers moving out or cashing out their homes to retire elsewhere where money lasts longer
      * Trump fatigue lowering voter enthusiasm among moderate-conservative Californians outside the central valley
      * Trump anger increasing turnout among young progressives, turning the blue parts of CA really, really, really blue

      San Diego in particular is experiencing this. Although coastal CA from the Bay to LA has been pretty progressive for a long time, San Diego has traditionally been comparatively pretty moderate. A strong military presence and a very laid back attitude toward life has kept a moderate status quo in effect for a very long time. Compared to the rest of CA cities, crime is low, the pace is relaxed, commerce is good as a tourist town, and we're not directly connected to the urban morass of Greater Los Angeles, being separated from OC by 20 miles of Camp Pendleton and from the rest of the country by deserts, forests, and mountains. Our County Board of Supervisors went through about 15 years were all 5 incumbents kept getting reelected not because of advantage, but because everything was just going pretty well.

      That's changed just recently in 2016 and now much more so in 2018. Suddenly the city council is controlled by a veto-proof majority of 6/9 Democrats, and the regional planning council (SANDAG) was re-constituted after an accounting scandal to give the City of San Diego almost veto control over the other cities in the county when it comes to long term transit planning and the like.

      The result has been a swath of relatively left-wing movements that have left a lot of longer-term San Diegans slightly bewildered. Banning of styrofoam and straws; a completely laughable goal of having 20% of all commute traffic done by bike by ~2025 (which is insane -- San Diego is incredibly hilly without many flat biking routes) has caused the council to convert car lanes to bike lanes in a "build it and they will come" notion; and a few other notably questionable decisions have ensued.

      In contrast to the rest of the state, San Diego still officially has a realistic view on the border situation, but it may just be a matter of time until the council adopts an attitude more in line with the "sanctuary" position. I think *THAT* might be the last straw and cause a push back from the "silent majority" of San Diegans who would prefer the more moderate policies status quo ante, but it'll be hard to tell until then.

      What I can say right now is that a lot of California isn't as blue as the noisiest folks, and I'm hoping the tipping point into absurdity results in a reaction among the residents who think the state has gone too far, regardless of their views on the rest of national politics.

    2. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      I feel a similar way about red states. The difference is people exaggerate about what California does (presenting proposed law for example), while downgrade stupid stuff the red states. Of course, the fact that most red states have lots of land no population (for some reason .. smirk), also explains why we don't talk about their laws.
             

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by lsllll · · Score: 1

      Wow! So intelligent. Why don't you try and argue his points?

      --
      Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
    4. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      In contrast to the rest of the state, San Diego still officially has a realistic view on the border situation,

      What is a realistic view on the border situation?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In contrast to the rest of the state, San Diego still officially has a realistic view on the border situation,

      What is a realistic view on the border situation?

      That Operation Gatekeeper in the '90s was a success, and that barriers/fences/walls/whatever function as a deterrent to illegal crossing, which is not something that should be encouraged.

      San Ysidro is the busiest land border crossing in the Western Hemisphere. Any native San Diegan is well aware of border issues surrounding illegal immigration. (I used to attend classes in Otay Mesa, about 1/4 mile from the mostly-commercial crossing there.)

      The contrast with the official view of the State of California now ("sanctuary state!" "unlimited resources!" "walls are immoral and don't work") is absolutely stunning. We have a wall now. It works. Whether we should build more is a policy question, but anyone who makes a blanket statement about how horrible or ineffective walls are... does not live in San Diego or is under the age of 25.

      This has been part of the kerfuffle between one of the TV stations here (the only non-network affiliate with a local news team) and CNN, which blew up the other day. Criticism or accusations of it being "right wing" miss the point that *all* of the local reporting by TV stations has been a) pretty level-handed, and b) in agreement that borders are A Thing and that having border fencing helps. It's self-evident for those here, but not to the national media that came in when the caravan arrived and San Ysidro was closed briefly.

    6. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "lots of land no population (for some reason .. smirk)"

      What's that reason in your mind? Could it be low population density and a much higher quality of life for those living here as a result? Or just your own misguided smug sense of superiority (...smirk)?

    7. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      It's self-evident for those here, but not to the national media that came in when the caravan arrived and San Ysidro was closed briefly.

      It is also self evidence to the national media, but they are dishonest fucks with an agenda.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    8. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by McFortner · · Score: 1

      Homophobe much?

      --
      Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
    9. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? I don't want to talk to him. My days on this earth are measured and and precious.

      Don't engage idiots. Tell them to fuck off and leave.

      Try it! It works!

    10. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We have a wall now. It works. Whether we should build more is a policy question, but anyone who makes a blanket statement about how horrible or ineffective walls are... does not live in San Diego or is under the age of 25.

      It depends on what you're trying to solve.

      Trump and co are touting a wall to help stop the flow of drugs. Except that most drugs get through at official border crossings hidden in cars and tracker trailers, not in backpacks of people crossing deserts.

      Yes, a wall / fence was already built in some places (by Dubya and others) across the border. Perhaps all the low-hanging fruit where it is effective has already been plucked, and we're entering into the areas of diminishing returns?

      What is the problem/s Trump is supposedly trying to solve with the wall? Is it perhaps just to fulfill some bullshit campaign promise? And why is he asking Congress for funding when Mexico was supposed to pay for it? And it is worth having several hundred thousand people not being paid?

    11. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

      Fuck off and leave!

      --
      -- sigs cause cancer.
    12. Re:Nearing the tipping point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah bitch. You're stuck with me now.

      Nice posting history.

  7. Eight years too late... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 0
    The Great Nanny State of California is finally doing something about CVS receipts.

    CVS Receipts refers to point-of sale records printed by CVS Pharmacy, the largest pharmacy chain in the United States, which have gained online notoriety for their lengthy form since the introduction of ExtraCare rewards program in 2011.

    1. Re:Eight years too late... by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      The Great Nanny State of California is finally doing something about CVS receipts.

      CVS Receipts refers to point-of sale records printed by CVS Pharmacy, the largest pharmacy chain in the United States, which have gained online notoriety for their lengthy form since the introduction of ExtraCare rewards program in 2011.

      Yeah, but without CVS receipts, I'd have to buy toilet paper. /s

    2. Re: Eight years too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. In California you just shit in the middle of the street and then wipe your ass with a copy of The Communist Manifesto.

    3. Re:Eight years too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might think you're joking, but the plastic bag ban has already caused an upswing in disease because the homeless, surprise surprise, have no easy way to dispose of their shit.

      Imagine what'll happen when they're wiping their asses with their hands on top of shitting in the street.

      Mix in the derpy California anti-vaxxers, stir in a double helping of unvaccinated illegals, throw in the bonus of decriminalizing intentional HIV transmission and fuck, we need to stop Trump from building the wall - because it's in the wrong fucking location, it needs to be around California to protect the rest of us.

    4. Re: Eight years too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. In California you just shit in the middle of the street and then wipe your ass with a copy of The US Constitution, as any good Liberal demands.

      FTFY.

  8. Are all Californians mentally ill or something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one thing to encourage companies to reduce environmental impacts, but a law that attaches a penalty is just bound to increase cost of doing business and the cost of living in California. These sorts of laws are ripe for abuse by petty bureaucrats who want power. My own town in Keene, New Hampshire has a major problem with bureaucrats and power trips and we're not nearly as bad as California. ie Just go search for Pho Keene Great and you'll know what I'm talking about.

    1. Re:Are all Californians mentally ill or something? by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      Gotta remember this is a state that consistently votes in democrat's even though state has highest cost of living in the US and every year they find new ways to make costs higher.

    2. Re:Are all Californians mentally ill or something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pho Keene Great

      God damn I love Vietnamese pho restaurants.

  9. Californa and Ban in the same sentence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a surprise!

    1. Re:Californa and Ban in the same sentence? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 0

      California is known for lots and lots of sunshine. Sunshine is known to cause skin cancer. California requires any carcinogen to be properly labelled, then banned. California, at this point, needs to ban California.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  10. Will the electronic receipts fade like the paper? by aberglas · · Score: 2

    Come tax time, the thermal printed paper ones are just blank.

  11. Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A lot of stores have employees/guards check receipts as customers exit. How is this going to work if it passes? Will the employee have tablet and somehow receive their checkout information? Will it involve even more tracking? RFIDs on shopping carts?

    1. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Seems like a tablet combined with a take-a-number system would be just fine. Gate checks aren't really enforceable other than telling a customer not to come back. They need evidence that theft has occurred to detain you, you don't need evidence that payment occurred to leave.

    2. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Or just print out a gate check slip without prices. Without prices and payment info it's not a technically a receipt.

    3. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A lot of stores have employees/guards check receipts as customers exit."

      And that's illegal. Those of us over 25 years old understand how bad that is and refuse, even at the risk of them calling the cops (who then laugh in their faces). Grow the F up already and stop degrading the rest of our freedoms because of your inability to think for yourself.

    4. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A lot of stores have employees/guards check receipts as customers exit."

      And that's illegal.

      Citation Needed.

    5. Re: Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you will have to install each store's app - failure to do so will get you tackled and arrested after you make a purchase and don't show your e-receipt -- with these store apps installed, they will all get to monetize your private life

    6. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe it's illegal, but it's voluntary. I rarely stop for such people, if they ask for my receipt before leaving I generally cheerfully say "no thanks" and continue walking. Only once or twice have they even made any further efforts to stop me and it's has never gone beyond "you don't have my permission to search my belongings". They know that it's voluntary, and if you refuse to participate the receipt checker is unlikely to escalate the situation. In theory, they could tell you that you're not allowed to come back and have the police give you a trespass warning but that's highly unlikely.

      --

      Enigma

    7. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have never seen a store like this and would never shop at one. Sounds like Cali is more far gone than I thought.

    8. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

      Guess you never get out much.

    9. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory, they could tell you that you're not allowed to come back and have the police give you a trespass warning but that's highly unlikely.

      Actually no, they can't. As you correctly stated, the checks are only legal if voluntary. If refusing to participate in a check were to result in a ban from the premises, then that check would no longer be voluntary. Only businesses that are not open to the public, for example Sam's Club and Costco, can punish you (though unlikely without good reason to believe you actually committed a crime, as they like your money too much) for refusing to take part in a check. This is because you signed a membership agreement that stated you would stop for the check. By refusing you are in violation of that agreement, and thus they can revoke your membership.

    10. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If refusing to participate in a check were to result in a ban from the premises, then that check would no longer be voluntary.

      Sure it is. Going back is a voluntary choice. They can ban you from the premises for any reason (except protected classes) and not show a receipt is a legally exceptable reason. That said, they aren't going to ban you. I walk past all the time.

    11. Re:Receipt-checks when exiting stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If refusing to participate in a check were to result in a ban from the premises, then that check would no longer be voluntary.

      Sure it is. Going back is a voluntary choice. They can ban you from the premises for any reason (except protected classes) and not show a receipt is a legally exceptable reason. That said, they aren't going to ban you. I walk past all the time.

      I'm not going to take the time to get too detailed on this subject. It's been hashed out countless times in courthouses and on the internet. The correct information is out there, but sadly there are those who still hold incorrect beliefs about this and related subjects. Unfortunately, often the very people who are in charge of upholding the law are actually quite ignorant of the law themselves. Even outside of protected classes, no business open to the public (this is key) has the right to refuse service for arbitrary reasons. Banning someone for refusing to take part in a voluntary receipt check would classify as an arbitrary reason. And again, the threat of retaliation for refusing to take part in a supposedly voluntary receipt check makes it no longer legally classified as voluntary. At that point you are being forced to comply under duress or coercion, which makes it illegal.

      Things change a bit when there is legitimate reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe a crime has occurred. In that situation a business can invoke the shopkeeper's privilege and/or related shoplifting/merchant statutes, which give them a few more options. However, it must be a legitimate reason, because if isn't (refusing to take part in something voluntary isn't a legitimate reason), the business has opened itself to legal action.

      I too walk past them all the time, excluding places where I'm under a contract having agreed to participate. I'm always polite, and simply state "no thank you, have a good day". If you're exceptionally rude/rowdy/aggressive, then you could open yourself to being legitimately banned for interfering with the safety and well-being of other patrons or the business itself. However I have had a few instances where the checker was inadequately trained, and emboldened by their perceived authority, attempt to detain me solely on the condition that I refused the voluntary receipt check. I remained calm and polite (thought they often didn't), recorded the encounter (always do this), and in the end I still left the premises without ever submitting to their attempts to force me to submit to a "voluntary" check. I then sent out emails to corporate which resulted in managers calling me, apologizing, admitting the checker and any other parties involved were inadequately trained, and promising to train them correctly (which is all I wanted).

  12. I remember when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when democrats were all against computers because of the Digital Divide⦠They seem to have forgotten a lot in 15 years.

    1. Re: I remember when... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I think you're remembering some kind of straw man.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Well those that are still hanging on against Walmart and Amazon.

    It's funny I had someone here (likely from California or New York) go on at me how people don't make good decision's for themselves.

    This just shows you how really bad politicians making decisions for them can be.

    1. Re:The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      What's the problem? Assuming they can accept credit cards or ATM cards, they likely have an Internet connection that can be used to email receipts as well. If anything, it's less labor since the receipt roll doesn't have to be changed as often, and there's less wear-and-tear to the printers.

    2. Re:The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      I am sure their cash register is an IOT device

    3. Re:The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Home Depot already does email receipts. This legislation is designed to impose high costs on the corner hardware store and further decrease their profits against the big corporate competition, to ultimately make it so that each vertical is dominated by one megacorp - those are easier to control.

      The politician may say this isn't his goal, but don't believe his words - watch the liars' actions instead.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The guy proposing the law is from San Francisco -- the locals tend to be fairly anti-corporate, even if the place is infested with techbros recently.

    5. Re:The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Connected to the internet != supports SMTP. Now you have to pay for a new register, ask every customer for his/her email account, and make sure that your SMTP Server isn't misdetected as a spammer relay and blocked. Or maybe the register would send data to the provider which would send the receipt? That would be a huge privacy issue.

    6. Re:The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The guy proposing the law is from San Francisco -- the locals tend to be fairly anti-corporate, even if the place is infested with techbros recently.

      The locals also only care what politicians are saying, not what they are doing. Democrats, for instance, are always saying they are the party of the worker, meanwhile they repeatedly shove a giant corporate cock down everyones throat

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:The Mom and Pop stores are going to love this by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      This legislation is designed to impose high costs on the corner hardware store...

      What high costs? My local hardware store already has a computer and internet connection. What additional costs are needed to e-mail receipts rather than print them?

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  14. We need a good war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see Oregon, Arizona, and Nevada wage a war of conquest over California. Let the victors receive the spoils. The winners would get to rape all the hot California beach babes. They would also get access to all the smart people that are living in Silicon valley The winners could force the smart Asians to build new and better weapons so that they could continue to wage more wars.

    This would could end 99% of the silliness coming out of California. Silly problems disappear when real problems arise.

    Who is with me. Let's get a petition started to invade California. Kill all the males and give the females over as brides to the conquerors.

    War, and starvation are the engines of evolution.

    Actually thinking about it some more, this has already happened. Mexico has already invaded and conquered California. What we need now is a reconquest of California by USAians.

    Might makes right. Darwin if king

  15. How about sale taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea of these receipts is to force merchants to declare sales and pay taxes. Without receipts, they could not register the sales in the cash register and avoid paying taxes - they didn't sell anything hence no tax paid.

    1. Re:How about sale taxes by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't actually help that much. For cash sales of small items that aren't returnable, they still wouldn't be logged in the register, or would be rung up as a cheap item.

    2. Re:How about sale taxes by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      It's pretty hard to ring something on the register and not declare it in the total.
      On the other hand, if the customer isn't expecting a receipt, you don't have to ring it in, can pocket the cash and report an inventory adjustment/shrinkage, offsetting store income.

  16. No way. Now how. by ebonum · · Score: 4, Informative

    I need a receipt and there is no way in H*** you are getting my email.

    1. Re:No way. Now how. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      spam5A82DF01@gmail.com. Or just use a catch-all at your domain and type t43t2gr3g3@domain.com. Any receipts and spam resulting from them get directed to a "toilet" account.

    2. Re:No way. Now how. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      To be fair you can get a new gmail for free and use plus expansion all you want. If you don't want to pay for real email.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That works great until the stores wise up and begin storing in the spam database the e-mail address minus everything between + and @. You have a technological solution, and they too will have a technological solution.

    4. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing its optional you twat.

    5. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would require me to accept cookies from Google. Never going to happen.

    6. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuckyou@gmail.com has been taken. What should I do?

    7. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use a mail client and not a browser.

    8. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you'll just have to ask for a receipt. I know, it's painfully difficult.

    9. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you create a Gmail account using a mail client?

    10. Re: No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to give your cell # to Google first!

      FAR worse.

    11. Re:No way. Now how. by thogard · · Score: 1

      My email address has a + and ! in it. Most systems won't take those characters. The shortest email address I've ever seen used was 5 characters long as it was two letters @ a CC TLD.

    12. Re:No way. Now how. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use postmaster@gmail.com

    13. Re:No way. Now how. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I need a receipt

      What for?

  17. Re:Will the electronic receipts fade like the pape by ebonum · · Score: 1

    Photocopy the receipt a day or two after purchase and staple the receipt to the copy before the paper receipt fades.

    From someone who gets audited and passes. Auguring with the IRS never goes well, and they don't give a damn if you are right. If you are right, you get the privilege of paying an attorney to prove you are right.

  18. just another way by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    this is just another way to collect data - now includes those who pay in cash. one thing for sure, it will make checking out a whole lot slower if you have to type or voice your email address. It means you could also be forced to sign up for some type of loyalty cards. so just say no and ask for paper.

  19. Re:Will the electronic receipts fade like the pape by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I found some thermal receipts the other day from 2013 - they're all fine. The new ones disappear in six months.

    Somebody told me it's because of a BPA ban, but I'm not sure. I haven't tried eating any of the new ones.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  20. Paper cash payments is then linked to the cloud? by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did any think of the privacy situation of never been able to buy anything with cash again without a digital recored kept?
    Paper receipts ensure your privacy to buy anything you want without getting tracked on another device.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  21. Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that ass-emblyman is an utter idiot, high on "green" kool-aid that's actually worse than we have now.

    The true cost of paper receipts isn't in the paper. Just like letters and much else paper. For paper is reliable, dependable, cheap, and well-understood technology that can be had from sustainable sources and recycled into itself or a myriad other things. Electronic trash, by contrast, mostly just ends up in landfills in some other shithole country, leaching heavy metals into the groundwater if you're unlucky. Not to mention the nasty chemicals used in making electronics. Chemical trash that can no longer be openly burned at sea, so it get mixed in with the heavy fuel oil fueling tankers. It still ends up in the environment. And so on, and so forth.

    I'm pretty sure that if you look at the full picture, the paper is a net win in "green". But such conclusions don't help an ass-emblyman bent on looking good and green. And to him, the bottom line is counted in votes, not in actual results.

    1. Re:Lemme call names then by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      You have a cash register anyway, probably with Internet connection to accept cards. Adding the ability to send an email is software -- it doesn't really contribute to e-waste.

    2. Re:Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In practice, 99% of these cash registers do not support email and would need to be replaced because the manufacturer won't add support to old models (and quite possibly is unable to). Furthermore, sending out emails would require maintain a database of customers - with the attendant update/hacking mess, and hacked machines would probably just be thrown away.

    3. Re:Lemme call names then by IcyWolfy · · Score: 2

      They should be barred from creating that database of customers.
      There is zero reason after emailing a receipt for a purchase, for the e-mail to be kept any longer.

      I fully support this bill, so long as there is a strict 'No Capture receipt is issued" requirement.

    4. Re:Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so long as there is a strict 'No Capture receipt is issued" requirement

      Do you honestly believe that will happen? I do not. Is such a restriction **already** in the bill to be introduced? If not, why the hell not.

    5. Re: Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This legislation would cost businesses a great deal of money. Regulations like this seem to be counterproductive and in my opinion should not be allowed. State and federal regulations the cost businesses money are often morally wrong. If a state or federal regulation causes a business to spend money, shouldn't they fund that business for their new law?

    6. Re: Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, trees used for paper are bred specifically for the purpose of making paper. They yield higher quality pulp with higher output overall than wild trees. These trees also don't grow many branches, and they grow straight upwards with a very smooth bark, which makes them much easier and cheaper to harvest.

      It doesn't make any economic sense to cut down wild trees, and we're not going to run out of them any sooner than we're going to run out of potatoes.

      Here's a pic of a tree farm:

      https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQuUzpS9_cCbGJ8ptLOajl7CKop7r5iMH3QwmrbUabt1BZ64_tO

      The biggest cause of loss of woodland, by far, is clearing room for food crops. Agriculture technology has dramatically increased crop yields, so the US pretty much doesn't do this, but third world countries do. Except for organic, which pretty much rules out the use of much of this technology in order to be considered "natural", so on a per yield basis, it does need more landmass, nonetheless, organic fans think it's sustainable anyways.

    7. Re:Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't create that database, than they'd have to ask for email each time and type it in manually. This would significantly slow down queues, and in the end customers would probably ask for the paper receipt just to go faster.

      Or maybe this could be implemented by registers connecting by bluetooth to your phone and transferring the receipt (not sure if this law allows this). I'm sure that you want to let random registers connect to your phone, and that there won't be any security issues or pairing problems with that.

      Either way, you will still to throw away 99% of current registers, creating far more e-waste than which might be saved by this proposal.

      IMHO, this proposal is technologically too early and would benefit from a far more incremental approach.

    8. Re:Lemme call names then by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Probably more electricity used to send the receipt electronically than just printing the paper.
      But I wouldn't worry about it, it's a common practice to create news about some crazy guy's plan that will never actually occur. It isn't that California is weird this way, go to any state or country and there's always that one guy that proposes something stupid.

    9. Re:Lemme call names then by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      In practice, 99% of these cash registers do not support email

      I get e-receipts from Walmart and Home Depot.

      If they can do it, why can't others?

    10. Re:Lemme call names then by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I fully support this bill, so long as there is a strict 'No Capture receipt is issued" requirement.

      So everyone in the checkout line has to re-enter their email address for every purchase? That is silly.

      The e-receipts that I receive are automatically tied to either my credit card or my phone. Swipe, tap, done.

    11. Re:Lemme call names then by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But I wouldn't worry about it, it's a common practice to create news about some crazy guy's plan that will never actually occur. It isn't that California is weird this way, go to any state or country and there's always that one guy that proposes something stupid.

      We said that about the plastic bag ban. Then, they passed it. Now, we have to buy trash bags for my house that use 10x as much plastic, use 10x as much fuel to deliver them to the store, and are basically worse for the environment in almost every other measurable way. And yet still, there's tons of trash blowing around our streets, because what the legislators didn't do is pass a law fining the garbage truck companies for overuse of automation in ways that result in trash littering the streets behind them.

      So no, we should not assume that any idea, no matter how bonkers, is beyond the level of bats**t-craziness that the California legislature is capable of exhibiting. We should always assume that any idea proposed by a politician, no matter how absurd, is likely to pass, and use every ounce of our strength to stomp the bad ideas squarely into the ground.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Lemme call names then by zidium · · Score: 2

      Hey, moron!

      Do you honestly think people are going to type in their email address at the counter every time they want a receipt?! No way!

      This is a huge leap toward a totalitarian police state. That's what this is. Cash or card, government will know.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    13. Re:Lemme call names then by zidium · · Score: 1

      Only statists (::cough:: Leftists) would ever force this on every store.

      Especially in the most populous state!

      Hey, California! Convince some poor low-population state like New Hampshire to test your bullshit ideas first! Jumping in head first as the largest state with the largest city is a good way to end up dead in the water.

      Just ask any competent engineer.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    14. Re:Lemme call names then by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      I get e-receipts from Walmart and Home Depot.

      If they can do it, why can't others?

      Are you fucking serious? Those are the two of the largest retailers in the United States. You think every goddamn quick-stop has a cash register that will send email?

    15. Re:Lemme call names then by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Largest city? Los Angeles? Yeah.. no..... *hint* NY

    16. Re:Lemme call names then by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Email is _not_ secure from broad government monitoring. The NSA's unconstitutional "Carnivore" email monitoring program still exists, it was merely renamed, to DCS1000.

    17. Re:Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Customer databases are *very* popular. Ubuntu has been doing it for a while, Lennart Pottering and the Fedora board want to build host UUID tracking features into Fedora "so they can track how many Fedora users there are". The data will never be secure, because there is no way to avoid people abusing it.

    18. Re: Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they are megacorps that already use the most expensive point of sale terminals on the market.

    19. Re: Lemme call names then by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      So instead of a receipt that takes less than a second to print, and is completely recyclable you want people at the checkstand to be typing in - or even worse, trying to get the checker to type in by dictation - everyone's email address?

      The old lady who writes checks and has a folder of coupons thinks this will slow everything down at a store's front end.

      It's a solution looking for a problem.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    20. Re: Lemme call names then by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Because Home Depot and Walmart are fortune-100 corporations with an army of IT people and budgets of millions of dollars?

      Please think every once in a while.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    21. Re: Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a solution looking for a problem.

      I was about to say, that would be the short and sweet of it. But on reflection: It's a solution looking for votes, and whether it actually solves anything is entirely besides the point.

      Retailers, especially large ones, will love it: More customer data to monetise. Heck, do away with the paper, they'll say, and force everyone who wants a receipt to register. That'll cause more spam, which isn't free of cost either.

      Over here in (a country in n/w) yurp, supermarkets and such ask me whether I want a receipt. Along with sometimes two or three other thingies I may or may not want.* Some shops print it anyway and throw it away if I don't want it. Others only print one if I answer affirmatively. Yet others I have to ask.

      I always get the paper receipt though I very rarely need it. But on occasion I do need it. Especially when I forgot to ask. So I ask.

      * Trading stamps, promotion stamps or gimmicks, what-have-you. I basically never want those.

    22. Re: Lemme call names then by Jadecristal · · Score: 1

      Statist is probably preferable.

      The left-right spectrum is NOT about politically liberal to conservative.

      Itâ(TM)s about âoeforceâ - just like this, âoedo what we sayâ - to âoenot-forceâ, i.e. freedom. The fact that political parties have co-opted and distorted this until âoewar is peaceâ-level cognitive dissonance is the minds of the general public is just another symptom of the problem.

    23. Re:Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ever try returning something with an e-receipt, especially at Wallyworld? Last 2 times I bought something in store and got own when I needed to return or exchange it I was told because I got it by email I had to go through the website as I had to have bought it there not in the store that is across the street from my road.

    24. Re:Lemme call names then by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      And how many times has Home Depot been hacked? They can't be trusted with data.

    25. Re:Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate this idea, but that's a poor reason. The smallest places now use apps such as Square to email you receipts, we see them in pop-up stores and people taking money for parking on special events here. The upscale places all have email as an option. The places that remain have usually been around for a long time and never updated their stuff, or they're cash-only.

      Actually having an email server and domain is super cheap... I think I pay $30 every 3 months for the server plus annual registration fees. All you do is rent a terminal that accepts email, it's an option when they rent it.

      Why do I hate this idea? I don't want to have to input my email address at POS ever. That's a stupid way to lose customers who don't want to wait while you educate someone who has never done it before. I also don't want my purchases tracked at yet another level, although I admit the only way to not be tracked today is to pay cash. Around here, that money has most likely been in a stripper's asshole once or twice, which is something I don't want to think about when I'm handing over $20 at breakfast.

    26. Re:Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In practice, 99% of these cash registers do not support email

      I get e-receipts from Walmart and Home Depot.

      If they can do it, why can't others?

      Walmart and Home Depot are multi-billion dollar corporations with huge IT departments. This proposal is a heavy unfunded burden on small businesses.

    27. Re: Lemme call names then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those plastic bags that you reused... cause havoc on recycling centers. The big garbage bag designed specifically for trash, doesn't.

    28. Re: Lemme call names then by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Normal people don't recycle trash bags. What happens in a recycling center if someone tries to do so is moot.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    29. Re:Lemme call names then by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      You have a cash register anyway, probably with Internet connection to accept cards. Adding the ability to send an email is software

      ...and your email address. What if you'd rather they not have it? I get enough spam as it is.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  22. Re: Will the electronic receipts fade like the pap by hey! · · Score: 1

    Plus handling them results in high blood levels of synthetic estrogen analogs.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  23. Why haven't CC's done this still? by Sebby · · Score: 1

    It still astonishes me that credit card companies haven't improved on this yet - statements are still cryptic line-items that sometimes lead to chargebacks because people don't remember/can't figure out what it's exactly for, nor is there some electronic means to verify the charge to some type of virtual receipt produced at the time of purchase.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:Why haven't CC's done this still? by thogard · · Score: 2

      MasterCard and Visa want to get in this business. All the systems they have been building over the last few years have had the capacity to include extensive order details in the records sent to them.

  24. Coming in the year 2025... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "California Lawmaker wants to ban paper receipts entirely, nationalize shopper tracking"

    Summary: It's important that we save millions of trees each year and also understand shopping habits so that we can later roll out a fully government controlled food economy. There's just too much choice in the inherently unstable marketplace and people can't be trusted to make their own decisions.

  25. Statute of Frauds by WorBlux · · Score: 1

    I'm sensing a conflict here for large purchases.

  26. Re:Will the electronic receipts fade like the pape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no. but the company will have a data breach or other 'incident' and won't be able to verify that the 'digital' one is unaltered and accurate, so they won't accept it anyway for a return or when the irs comes a knocking to verify during an extended audit.

  27. Produces CO2? by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It said receipts annually generate 686 million pounds of waste and 12 billion pounds of carbon dioxide, or the equivalent of 1 million cars on the road...

    Trees pull CO2 from the air to produce wood. The tree is cut down and the wood is pulped to form paper, which is then used to print the receipt. If the receipt is subsequently thrown away in a landfill, doesn't that remove CO2 from the atmosphere and sequester it underground?

    1. Re:Produces CO2? by careysub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Filling up landfills with carbon is a very inefficient way to deal with CO2 in the atmosphere. Landfill space, near urban areas (where the trash is generated), is at a premium. There is more than one pollution issue going on at a time. Filling up landfills with paper will scarcely make a dent in the CO2 in the atmosphere.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:Produces CO2? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Paper receipts are not a pollution problem though. They turn to dirt quickly enough that it really doesn't matter.

    3. Re:Produces CO2? by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      The water use required to manufacture the paper is one problem. Another is that any trees cut down that were still growing would've been able to suck in even more CO2 until they mature.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    4. Re:Produces CO2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's your opinion. The lawmakers in Cali decided that it is a problem. You aren't a lawmaker. No one cares about your opinion.

  28. Good ol' treasonous inbred Republican deplorables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yea welfare red states, that is funny" - It's a fact. What's "funny" is that your faggoty redneck traitors can't pay their bills, and more coal mines have closed under Trump than any other President. #Winning prison!

  29. Business will need to have published public key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would make every money transaction traceable as every receipt would have to be digitally signed and verified by a public key registered to the business.
    This is tracking everything.

  30. Re:Paper cash payments is then linked to the cloud by PPH · · Score: 2

    never been able to buy anything with cash again

    That's the idea. Cash is on the way out. All purchases will be tracked (now) and approved (in the future). According to your needs (as determined by The State).

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  31. No phone? Get out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like some stores refusing cash for purchases, this will adversely affect the poorest members of society.

  32. Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when Radio Shack was mocked ruthlessly here for years for wanting all your info just to buy batteries? Lets all welcome our new Democrat overlords!

  33. Home Depot already does this by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    This isn't rocket science... if you purchase with a credit card, Home Depot ALREADY DOES this.

    If you want to return things:

    * Give the items you want to return to the clerk.

    * Clerk scans the items, and gives back all the stuff you bought at Lowes and forgot where it came from.

    * You swipe all the credit cards you might have used to purchase the returned items.

    * Home Depot uses the card data to look for receipts associating a purchase of one or more returned items using that card, and automatically credits the price back to the card.

    * For everything else, you provide your ID, and they give you a store credit (the ID is needed to limit the ability to brazenly shoplift items and return them later... if you start returning TOO MANY big-ticket items without a receipt, they'll restrict your ability to get receipt-free refunds of cash purchases in the future.

    1. Re:Home Depot already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting. A co-worker of mine had his identity stolen by contractors (probably undocumented) and they got some kind of credit at Home Depot and bought a ton of shit in his name, and now reading your post I realize they probably returned it before he could report the incident. Sneaky.

    2. Re:Home Depot already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Home Depot has jumped the shark. They used to have great customer service and back then I would spend money there any day over Lowes. Now they have eliminated most of their knowledgeable staff and the checkout lines are completely devoid of employees. The whole place is self service only. I cannot believe that I purchase lumber and I am only able to check out myself by scanning plywood and 2x4s. Their prices aren't any lower to compensate either. The last time I spent 30 minutes shopping only to leave my merchandise at the checkout lanes when there was nobody to help. If I wanted to scan and bag merchandise, I'd get a fucking job doing it.

      Fuck 'em.

    3. Re:Home Depot already does this by MeNeXT · · Score: 2

      You are only addressing the part that protects the store. What about the part that protects the consumer or the government?

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    4. Re:Home Depot already does this by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      As someone who generally sucks at keeping receipts, and who usually finishes up a home improvement project with several hundred dollars worth of stuff that was bought 15 minutes before closing time (just to make sure I'd have everything I needed to finish some project after the store closed, but before going to bed) or purchased for the sake of having enough extra to avoid having to make 3 trips per day to buy one more {whatever} after the last one was [fucked up | dropped into a hole | not quite enough to finish the job], I'd say being able to make returns without needing a receipt is a pretty HUGE benefit for consumers.

    5. Re:Home Depot already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate that actually.

      Plastic bags and emailed receipts. Please just REQUIRE paper bags and ban plastic ones, WAY higher positive environmental impact.

    6. Re:Home Depot already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who coerced Home Depot into doing this? Nobody? Ok yea let's keep it that way. This is a convince many customers will want so business will provide it anyway without the government making yet another regulation. I use a similar system at micro center and I can log into the site and see receipts and rebates and what not from anything I buy in the store automatically linked to my card without having to give them my email over and over again.

      However I don't want to do this with all stores I shop at. Sometimes I just want to pay cash and get a paper receipt.

  34. Pretty much everyone does this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in Canada anyway. It's been that way for a number of years now.

    I've made it a habit to ask for a receipt when I see a clerk not printing one off for me. Usually he or she will ask and that's an invariable "yes" from me in response. I either toss it in the trash (yep, the trash) or it winds up going in my to shred pile at home, which also winds up in the trash eventually, or the fireplace.

    I WANT that written record, even if I don't always need it.

  35. Seashells, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably time to stock up on and learn to use the three seashells!

  36. Easy way for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would be for it to be implemented at the bank/credit union level. They already have your email, it shouldn't be hard for them to either send you an email or just keep the virtual receipt in their system for 5 years.

    1. Re:Easy way for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could only print out the amount you paid, but not what you paid it for, and that's not enough - unless you want to transfer information on essentially everything you buy to them so they could print out the full receipt.

  37. Go back to paper receipts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can be recycled. Ban the thermal receipts. Why should citizens be forced to provide email to have receipts sent? Opens us all up to SPAM, identity theft, etc.

  38. Great.. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    1) All digital banking.
    2) Shady algorithms to maximize bank fees.
    3) All digital receipts.
    4) Shady algorithms to round up to target profit margins when banks and merchant account providers (other banks, basically) start colluding.
    5) Years/decades/forever of people being perpetually poor as the algorithms decide how much they need of their own money before they would otherwise sue.

  39. Digital wallets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... some privacy concerns ...

    A receipt really details total expense and the total taxes. It would be easy to change the current EFTPOS system to include that sub-total. In the real world, many receipts also include the invoice, which is a much larger chunk of data.

    We have digital cash, in the form of an ATM card. We need a digital wallet to hold digital receipts. For integrity, it could be parallel to the current EFTPOS system, with the bank receiving a receipt (via the payment processor) they can't decrypt. Then it's something that can't be targeted for spam, or sold as tracking data.

    Digital cash was originally envisioned to be contained in portable, digital wallets: As something that could be moved from digital wallet to digital wallet. So a digital wallet (containing digital cheques) would be a great step towards monetary privacy. That's something the government doesn't want consumers to have.

  40. Faked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cant wait until the ffirst receipt is faked...

  41. Re:Paper cash payments is then linked to the cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think there's no record when it's a cash payment? You are very stupid.

  42. No problem just use the right email address by n2hightech · · Score: 1

    Give the store the email address of assemblymember Phil Ting who proposed the bill assemblymember.ting@assembly.ca.gov. No inconvenience at all.

  43. Re:Paper cash payments is then linked to the cloud by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Buying a book, music, a political meme as art work is still a bit more private with cash than a direct connection to a smart phone AC.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  44. Total Opposite by QuebecNerd · · Score: 2

    Since a few years here in Québec/Canada, Restaurants are obligated by law to give a paper receipt in hand even if the customer doesn't want it. They need to throw it out themselves if they don't want it. A special section is added to the receipt by the black box of the gouvernement and they don't even compensate for the additional paper and wear and tear of the printer! Inspectors are visiting restaurants and handing out penalties if those laws are not respected... Total Opposite...

    1. Re:Total Opposite by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that's to prevent tax evasion?

    2. Re:Total Opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes indeed.

  45. Max Length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather see a law that had a max length per line items. If you only buy 2-3 items the receipt should be a small stub not a 3 foot long monstrosity.

  46. Where are they stored? by bjwest · · Score: 1

    Not only stored, but how do I know I've "collected" all my receipts at the end of the year (or up to seven years later), and, most importantly, will the IRS accept these during an audit?

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
  47. Another leftist bubbleboy moron outed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This idiot apparently thinks that everybody is as tethered to electronic pacifiers as he and his idiot friends are.

    There are millions of Americans who do NOT walk around with brain-killing "smartphones" aneasthetizing them. Not everybody is in a position to accept an "electronic receipt" and there's certainly no Constitutional requirement that all Americans become slaves to shiny baubles made by Apple or Samsing.

    It's less and less surprising to see the huge political gap opening up between the zombies in the big cities and everybody else. The former fancy themselves super-smart but would be unable to feed themselves and get safe drinking water, to say nothing of clothing and shelter, if their big city systems ever failed - they're really less equipped to live as independent adult humans than the average 12 year old was a century ago. California's government has become quite a hallucinatory freak show in the past few years. These people would die of panic if they could not get to Facebook or Google on their phones.

  48. Only if its QR codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not giving any company my email or phone number. If you want to give me a digital receipt then it must be a QR code that I scan at the POS; otherwise fuck you!

  49. Dry cleaners and etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They give you a ticket to redeem your clothes. Will that be considered a receipt? There could be many edge cases like this which will have unintended consequences. Forcing mom and pop businesses to no paper receipts will increase their costs, setup and maintain paperless system, and put them at a disadvantage to the big boys who'll only take local money out of the area. What about rural areas with poor cellular and wired internet access? How will they give a digital receipt to customers.

  50. Not just "no"... by Chas · · Score: 2

    Yep. Because we have such a good history with completely electronic systems. Where physical access allows pretty much anyone to do anything.

    And no paper trail means that it's just that much easier to cheat.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  51. Legally required spam by rossz · · Score: 2

    No thank you. And don't tell me the law could prohibit using the email address for marketing. When has that ever stopped them?

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  52. e-Waste is more polluting than paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does paper contain lead or other heavy metals? No. Does your electronics contain lead and/or other heavy metals? Hell yeah.

    Paper doesn't use any electricity once it's been printed. Your electronics need electricity all the time, and that means you're polluting once more.

    These tree huggers need to get an actual education on trees. Real conservationists know that you prune trees from time to time to keep them healthy. I chop my trees down to just above my head level every single year, and every year they grow right back again, as big and strong as ever. There is no need to try to reduce the use of tree products to save trees when trees simply grow right back again.

  53. Good luck on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Demanding that the poor and homeless pay up to go digital. Like that is epic. Maybe they should be told to eat cake as well.

  54. Nfc by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    Could NFC technology be used for delivering a digital receipt to your phone without you having to hand over your email address (and thus get spammed)? It would also be a lot faster than waiting in line for people to spell out their email addresses.

    Any time I'm asked for my email address so they can send me the receipt, I refuse. And I'll continue to refuse. So if this is to be forced, then a better way than email or SMS is needed.

    Oh, and can you guys sort out those CVS receipts, as that one chain is probably responsible for half of all receipt paper...!

    1. Re:Nfc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely. Nfc has distance, speed and in practice, size limitations (e.g. type 4 is limited to 65K, but a receipt PDF can easily pass that once you add signatures, encryption, images etc.). It would add significant amounts of time to checkouts and you'll have to stand rather close. There's a reason why large file transfer on phones always uses bluetooth or Wi-Fi - and why Google just deprecated the Android Beam API which was used to transfer files over NFC...

  55. Nope by aepervius · · Score: 3, Informative

    Paper usually decompose quite well , and most of it return to the atmosphere under the form of CO2, possibly methane both which are not sequestered, it just seep up. But the whole cutting wood, pulping it, producing paper cutting it to rolls, producing ink, delivering that ink/paper, all cost CO2. So this is not carbon neutral, even if your paper was not decomposing.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  56. 10 million trees by Don9999 · · Score: 1

    10 million trees just to print receipts. They completely logged the side of a lake we are on for 42 miles. Even if someone of the paper is made from recycled paper, I refused to use paper towels to dry my hands. Your hands dry anyway. Shake the water off your hands and then give your arms a moisturizer as you walk out of the washroom.

  57. Re: Good ol' treasonous inbred Republican deplorab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The message above was brought to you by the Committee to Reelect Donald Trump in 2020.

    Remember voters - Democrats are deranged, mean-spirited wingnuts whose idea of political debate is hurling childish insults. Compared to Democrats President Trump is grown up, kind hearted, and a serious intellectual.

    Vote TRUMP in 2020 - for common decency!

  58. It's UV or sunlight in general. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got receipts from 10-20 years ago, and ones from just a year or less ago.

    If you get them out in full sunlight they can fade out within a few days. Some will 'brown' causing outlines of some of the text to still be visible, but the majority will fade to white.

    On the other hand, not all that different from optical writeable media, if you keep them in the dark and relatively cool, you can dig them out a few years later and they will look just as good as new.

    Really, *ANY* light on them seems to fade them. I am not sure if it s a certain amount of exposure, or a certain time, but if they are exposed to light (possibly ONLY sunlight) they will fade to white.

  59. Paper till receipts were to protect the shopkeeper by AntisocialNetworker · · Score: 2

    When mechanical tills were first introduced, shopworkers would ring up the wrong amounts and pocket the difference. So they introduced a till roll. That didn't stop the fraud until they gave the customer a copy, since then the customer would complain if the receipt showed the wrong amount. (Any benefit to the customer's right to complain was probably incidental).

    We're already seeing electronic receipts a lot in the UK. At least I get asked if I want a paper receipt. And email ones make sense for "click and collect" purchases where they already have my email address.

  60. $300/year max fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the $300/year max fine is just a way to effectively tax all the large companies that see paper receipts as a good way to advertise to you. do you think CVS really cares about spending $300/year to keep printing 26" receipts filled with ads?

  61. Idiots like idiots by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Who voted for that idiot?

  62. Re:Will the electronic receipts fade like the pape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Auguring with the IRS never goes well

    Which animal would you recommend for reading its entrails?

  63. one liberal spot in a ultra conservative country by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Yeah, how terrible is it that we have a few liberal states? We need ALL of the country to be 100% in lockstep with whatever Rush Limbaugh says. Anything other than that would be terrible. Imagine... People with different ideas and different ways of life living in the same country? Madness! We really should just have one political party, and kick out anybody who doesn't agree. Great idea.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  64. Do we are androids or humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a smartphone to "get" the receipt, I want to keep "classified" my email (right ! - now every shop can be "cracked" and more chances of span), so I have to buy an USB stick to get the receipt on it.
    Do the shop allow for an USB to be used ?
    Do the shop have a soft to vizualize my receipt if I return item ?
    Do I believe they won't "peek" to my other receipts, after all they can copy all my receipts and create a profile, no (?), after all this is the world after...
    Well, my only clear and also classical is to get a paper receipt, and since as always it is perishable I will have to make a "xerox" type copy on a paper who will resist for an year or more... (some warranties are 2-3-5 years !).
    What a wonderfull waste of time (was this ideea submitted on paper?) !

  65. NFC? by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

    So I know there are some NFC security factors what probably need to be tightened up before I want something pushed to my phone, but isn't this a perfect opportunity for NFC on the pay terminal? We already have CC terminals with touch to pay. As a first step, well before we start mandating and/or banning anything, what about passing contactless payment receipts back to the customer's device and then displaying it? Second step, even for CC contact payments the customer would hold their phone to the terminal and get the receipt.

    Just an idea of how to do it without giving out email addresses, which take time, rubs me the wrong way, and does seem like a bigger add to the terminals than NFC.

    --
    If you can't be good, be good at it!
  66. I love this idea. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I mean go buy an item from any large grocery store and pay with a card, and you can't get away without having like 3 bits of completely useless paper forced on you.
    That badly needs to end.

    1. Re:I love this idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree it's largely a waste, but at the same time, I don't want a receipt at all unless I'm buying something of worth like electronics that I may need to return. I also don't want a "relationship" with stores. I do my level best to always pay cash, never give out email, phone, name, or address. Buying thing like alcohol, tobacco, junk food, etc., should always be done in cash, because the stores and even banks will actually sell purchase info to various companies like insurance companies, etc.

      Yesterday's story about the new crop of cars that will track you while you drive is further proof that the rich and those in control want to further control the masses. I don't want people knowing anything about me unless I decide they should know. We are headed for a nanny state controlled by corporations who will willingly hand this info over to governments, thus defeating the entire need for a warrant. A certain large social media company already shares info with insurance companies. Imagine you have friends in your circle using the same social media company and they feature tons of photos with partying, alcohol, lewdness, etc. You are, by dint of being "friends", now tainted. Background checks look heavily into this aspect of people and it can and will come back to haunt people. We are moving into a seriously dystopian future: cashless, control at every turn, personal time being monopolized by employers, ID badges at work that track bathroom breaks, movements, etc. All of this really leads me to looking for and more at being self employed to take back what little control I can exert over my life.

  67. Obligatory Seinfeld by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  68. Thermal Paper: Bispenol A/S Must Go by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    I don't agree with making a cellphone mandatory for shopping, but people have to make receipts that are safe for handing and disposal. I've lost too many people to cancer to disregard its causes.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Thermal Paper: Bispenol A/S Must Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Receipts are toxic and most people don't even realize that fact. I do and tell stores I don't want the receipt except for expensive purchases like electronics and then I ask for the receipt to be put in the bag, where it stays for 30 days to ensure I don't need to return something.

      I also don't want an electronic receipt, which is not done for your convenience, it to gather data. I refuse to play this game. I can see a time where failure to disclose something results in no sale. I will simply choose another vendor. I'm in Texas, where there are literally tons of Latin grocery stores who prefer cash, since most of their patrons are day laborers and usually that's all they have. Their produce selections are far better than the big chains, since Latin peoples eat loads of fruits and vegetables.

      NYC now has cashless stores, which is discriminatory, because not everyone can afford a phone and also have a cashless app, which requires a bank account.

      Brave new world...

  69. I'll pass, thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I shop, I take the pragmatic approach; I don't want a relationship with you. I'm giving you CASH tangible goods like bread, cheese, and milk. The push for a cashless society is is borne out of one of control, not convenience. Retailers have to pay merchant fees and and most still prefer cash. I prefer cash. I don't use supermarket loyalty cards and never will. The odd time when I have to shop at Kroger because they have something I need that nod other vendor has, I notice that even when I say "no" to the loyalty card, the cashier still scans the store's card to "tie in" your debit card (I didn't have cash the last two times I went). I will NEVER buy alcohol or tobacco with anything other than cash. The tracking that stores and banks do in the background is insane. People fall into two camps here: they either don't care because they are saving a feew pennies or they care deeply. As one of the latter, I think it's just a matter of time before the tracking is so insidious you cannot escape it. Some stores actually track your phone, which is one reason I have disabled everything on my phone when out in public.

    I'm not paranoid at all, but THEY are out to capitalize on people and the rich and those in control do want to control the masses. I have seen this coming since forever. Being in IT makes this more of a priority for me because I understand how it all works and where the tie-ins are. Now they want to track eyeballs in cars. Every store wants a "relationship" with you. Doctors' offices ask if there are firearms in your home. Employers want to monopolize your time even when off the clock. My last employer tried this. I told them when I'm off the clock, I'm unemployed and my time is my own. I refuse to be controlled and shepherded by those who want only to control me physically, emotionally, mentally, whatever.

    Brave new world doesn't even begin to describe it. I fear for my young children and wonder just how dystopian it will become for them and will they have the presence of mind to understand it and fight back.

  70. Re:10 million trees - and are replanted by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    You have a horrible misconception.

    The trees used for paper are called "softwood" and are replanted. Fact, the paper industry replants more than they use. The paper industry does not destroy forests.

    You are whining about logging for lumber, not paper. Different trees.

    Stop being stupid, those paper towel makers are helping.

  71. Re:Paper cash payments is then linked to the cloud by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    You're essentially asking if a politician thought about the consequences of the legislation that they voted for. They barely get time to read what they're voting for, let alone think about it.

  72. wtf is wrong with the water in california by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is wrong with the water in california? there's no other explanation for the stupidity that gets thought there.

    1. Re: wtf is wrong with the water in california by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing is wrong with the water in california. theres is none, they have steal, errr "acquire" it from other states

  73. cost of digitally storing by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    what's the cost of digitally storing and making available only to the purchaser all receipts for perpetuity ?

    --
    Go well
  74. Swim little shee^H^H^H^Hfishies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet they still have a shithole state with sidewalks full of shit, criminal gangs running the cities, rampant illegal immigration, drug abuse, political entities on every level out of touch with their constituents, corruption, not to mention geographic instability. can't even clean up your own state and you're presuming to tell others how important your shithole state is to the welfare of the other states? hahahaha you deserve the stupidity thought up there.

  75. Re:Paper cash payments is then linked to the cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fact: This announcement is that they have printed it to be read, then at a later date, when everyone has had time to read it, it will be discussed and voted on.

  76. no, without suitable technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, we can't do this without suitable technology to replace paper receipts. An anonymous application to transfer data to and device no longer exists. Perhaps in the PalmOS & Nokia era of handhelds we could have beamed them over IRda. But currently devices lack the interfaces and protocols to do this.

    Displaying a QR code would work, but the infrastructure required for vendors to store receipts isn't here in a scalable way.

  77. Save the crops! by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Most paper in the US is made from trees grown on tree farms. Yes, trees are a crop, planted and raised by farmers, like any other crop. They just have a longer harvest cycle than seasonal crops.

    http://www.ecology.com/2011/09...

    Why do we want to put tree farmers out of business?

  78. So so satisfying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please cry more. Your tears sustain me. Fun fact: Conservatard tears are 10 times saltier than the other leading brands.

  79. Old much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faggot no longer refers to gay people. There's a South Park episode from, like, 10 years ago explaining it to you with a Harley Davidson metaphor. You really should keep up with the times, you faggotty grandpa.

  80. privacy solved: Take a picture of the screen by Gunstick · · Score: 1

    The reciept-less tellers will have a big e-paper display facing the customer which shows the complete reciept.
    It includes a fingerprint certifying that it's signed by the shop's private key.
    The customer uses his phone to take a picture of the reciept. Done.

    If the customer does not have a camera, he pushes a button and gets a printout.

    See... there is no email address involved. Completely anonymous.

    This solution is visibly so simple that nobody will even think about it.

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  81. Warranty scam in the making? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So store say they've sent you a digital receipt, then you find they haven't when you get home....

  82. Signed with your chip card's private key by tepples · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that a computer file fixed in a tangible medium (such as the SSD of your mail server) was "written". At least that's the case in copyright law. Moreover, a document whose hash is encrypted with the private key on your payment card's chip is digitally "signed". Is there case law on the statute of frauds to the contrary?

    1. Re:Signed with your chip card's private key by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Copyright specifically says fixed in tangible form. The Statute of frauds just says written. There's still a few questions around legal procedure of electronic documents. At least in the U.S. no state agency is handing out ID's with an embeded smart-card chip. And even if it were accepted in a court it only proves the card was present, and even if accepted as signature, signature/acceptance is only one element of a valid contract. Even a simple sale, you still would need to describe the offer and consideration (the specific thing sold, any special terms, and the price). An e-mail after the fact is exactly what the statutue of frauds doesn't like. If the terms were clearly presented or displayed at the point of sale and the purchaser was given an opportunity to accept than then an option to email a receipt, That
      probably be fine. Just something to keep in mind when designing the system, that high-value sales may need an extra step.