Slashdot Mirror


User: worthawholebean

worthawholebean's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
58
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 58

  1. Re:print? on Google Offering Print Versions of Online Books · · Score: 1

    What often happens is they get donated to book bank-type programs which give away the books for free. I've been volunteering at one for a few years, and we get a lot of free books from publishers like that.

  2. Re:So let me get this right; on Professor Posts "Illegal Copy" of Guide To Oregon Public Record Laws · · Score: 1

    He can't challenge the validity in court unless he is harmed by the law - he has to have standing to sue. If he gets sued now, he can bring up the issues.

  3. Re:Unsafe at any SPEED on Parental Control Software Datamines Kids' Online Conversations · · Score: 1

    The Associated Press, apparently.

  4. Re:Privacy? Huh? on US Couple Gets Prison Time For Internet Obscenity · · Score: 1
    In fact, in Miller v. California, the following test was given for obscenity:

    • the average person, applying contemporary community standards (not national standards, as some prior tests required), must find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
    • the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions[1] specifically defined by applicable state law; and
    • the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

    This test is still in use today.

  5. Re:Privacy? Huh? on US Couple Gets Prison Time For Internet Obscenity · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but this does have a legal history in the US and is much better than it used to be. All these doom-and-gloom "what happened to the US" posts ignore that obscenity law used to be much, much stricter.

  6. Re:Hundred Millions or Hundred Thousands? on China Bans Gold Farming · · Score: 1
  7. Re:And how much money does Jimbo make? on Should Wikipedians Edit Stories For Pay? · · Score: 2, Informative

    My bad - he has not received money from Wikimedia ever. Even if he did have a salary, it would be to administer, not to create content.

  8. Re:And how much money does Jimbo make? on Should Wikipedians Edit Stories For Pay? · · Score: 0

    He does make his living off Wikipedia... it's called a salary.

  9. Re:This is what happens when... on Energy Secretary Chu Endorses "Clean Coal" · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA, the summary is pretty inaccurate. His shift on coal was at most relatively minor, from "I don't know if this can happen" to "If it can happen, it will take a long time to develop." On nuclear, his opinions haven't changed at all. I think his statements contain a remarkable amount of sense.

  10. Re:skibaldy on The Coming Censorship Wars · · Score: 1

    I don't have mod points right now, but this AC is quite obviously a troll (re: last paragraph).

  11. Re:Treason on Kentucky Officials "Changed Votes At Voting Machines" · · Score: 1

    The US Constitution defines treason as "levying war against [the US], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." This isn't it.

  12. Re:Election Fraud on Kentucky Officials "Changed Votes At Voting Machines" · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's not true at all. The U.S. has a long history of various forms of electoral fraud. See for example this book.

  13. Re:ex post facto on The Pirate Bay Is Making a "Spectrial" of It · · Score: 1

    Ex post facto has a relatively narrow legal interpretation in the U.S. - essentially, it only means you can't *increase* punishments in a criminal case retroactively. Decreasing punishments is (and should be) fine.

    See Calder v. Bull. Note that compulsory sex offender registration is not considered a punishment by SCOTUS.

    Disclaimer: IANAL

  14. Re:Books for students interested in competitions on Mathematics Reading List For High School Students? · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, it's probably a good idea to get kids interested in competitions. www.artofproblemsolving.com has an amazing forum for mathematically interested kids.

  15. Re:Sunshine on Wikileaks Publishes $1B of Public Domain Research Reports · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Watergate? If the offense is particularly egregious, getting it out in the open is usually enough to force change.

  16. Re:Let the CEO's work from India on IBM Offers to Send Laid-Off Staff to Other Countries · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, what generally happens in the US with eminent domain is an independent appraiser comes and the government then pays a significant premium OVER the appraised value. For example, in Kelo v. New London, the NLDC offered all the eminent domain'd people *twice* the appraised value of their homes.

  17. Re:"All traces of George W. Bush disappeared" on We're In Danger of Losing Our Memories · · Score: 1

    '"We haven't any use for old things here."
    "Even when they're beautiful?"
    "Particularly when they're beautiful. Beauty's attractive, and we don't want people to be attracted by old things."
    "But the new ones are so stupid and horrible... Why don't you let them see Othello instead?"
    "It's old. Besides, they wouldn't understand it."'
    -Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

  18. Re:Extracurricular activites on Class Teaches Nerds Social Skills · · Score: 1

    It is good to note, though, that colleges are far more selective than public high schools.

  19. Re:About time! on Black Hole At Center of Milky Way Confirmed · · Score: 1

    You're actually integrating one, not zero...

  20. Re:China on Obama Wants Broadband, Computers Part of Stimulus · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about that "slow giant" characterization. Consider the one-child policy, which will have absolutely wrecked their demographics by 2021, 50 years afters its beginning.

  21. Re:Could be fun on Google Was 3 Hours Away From DOJ Antitrust Charges · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the anti-trust laws are named that for a reason. They were originally written in the late 1800s to fight the monopolies and collusion created by "trusts" - secretive organizations of all the largest corporations in an industry. Honestly, the Google-Yahoo deal struck me as similar to these criminal trusts.

  22. Re:Idiots on New Massive Botnet Building On Windows Hole · · Score: 1

    Well of course if you have a rootkit, scanning for rootkits will show clean. Thats how they work.

    A rootkit modifies the kernel so that it intercepts all API calls, including the read() functions your scanner is using, and the rootkit feeds back false info such as directory listings omitting the rootkits files, and if one tries to open one of its files by name, the open() call now controlled by the rootkit returns a no such file error.

    Rootkits can be scanned for. See Rootkit Revealer. If you don't trust the kernel to accurately report the contents of the HD, just don't use it.

  23. Re:Lunatic Japan on Triple-Engine Browser Released As Alpha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's in alpha. You can't really expect it to have a fully-formed community or mature addons.

  24. Re:Christmas is early this year on Final Judgment — SCO Loses, Owes $3,506,526 · · Score: 1

    The very reason our do-nothing Congress "stood up" to the automakers is that it does nothing.

  25. Re:To Steve on Apple's New MacBooks Have Built-In Copy Protection · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I doubt this will ever happen. The fact is, hard drives (SSD or traditional) are and will remain a very efficient way of storing data. Maybe there would be some sort of mirroring, but I doubt we'll ever see computers just become thin clients.