ok, I don't know anything about American law, but if the U.S. government does indeed purchase a quantity of 'Linux licences' from SCO then wouldn't that imply support for their claims by the government and therefore lend them some credibility in later court action?
However I think the real problem with a 'form fitting' suit, wet or not, would be when breathing out.
Consider for a moment, when you breath in you expand your chest and abdomen to compensate for the volume of air in your lungs. Conversely your chest and abdomen contract when breathing out.
It seems to me that you would end up breathing in very fast, and labour to breath out. You'd end up exhausted just from breathing. Either that or I'm missing something fundamental here.
It might take several more years before Gecko tape is made commercially available to the wanna-be Spiderman, but he will have to thank the Gecko for that, not the spider.
Oh I can see it now; 'Gecko-man...Gecko-man...does whatever a Gecko can...'
No, somehow it doesn't have quite the same ring to it. Oh well.
Top exhaust vent
on
Alien Case Mod
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
The top exhaust vent is made from a model of the space station from ST:DS9. In the bottem-left of the picture you can even see the landing pad for the shuttle crafts.
It's the same model as I have hanging from my ceiling.
So obviously he's either consolidating a number of his hobbies, or he's supposed to be cleaning out his garage.:-)
I saw Russell Crowe regenerate his cells last night in Virtuosity. Of course, he used glass rather than stem cells, but it was a neat party trick anyway.
In Australia I believe that non-compete clauses/agreements are null and void because of 'restriction of trade'. ie; if they cause you to not be able to obtain employment then it is construed as restricting your ability to trade.
So I suppose signing them (in Oz) is almost harmless, sans the nuicence value of defending the court case. *sigh*
Until recently I was working at a Melbourne company (ie; in Australia) run by a very well known entertainment industry celebrity. When fixing his computer I noticed he had quite a swag of mp3's which his secretary said he routinely downloaded from the various sites.
Not that it means anything I suppose, but it's amusing how blatantly obvious it is that it's not the entertainers (singers, etc) but rather the **AA who are out for blood.
I wonder what would happen if one of their own were found to have a collection of unlicenced music. Any bets on if it would even see the light of day?
However, if you exclude results for 'clear glass holes in walls' and simply search for 'Microsoft' then you get ~37,000,000 hits. As opposed to ~52,000,000 for linux.
sheesh, how'd you get past the slashdotting? It'll take me four hours just to download the first page - to say nothing of how long it'll take to read the rest of 'em.
At the extreme you have folks who want to eliminate all traces of sex and violence from the popular media against the movie industry who wants to eliminate all property rights of the consumer. Whose side would you take?
Whose side? I'd take the side of Clean Flicks any day, and not necessarily because I advocate censorship. If Clean Flicks offer an alternative 'version' of the film, then I have the choice of which to purchase (or hire?). If I prefer not to see certain content, then I may choose to purchase it from Clean Flicks, or I could still buy it from the usual channels if I want the original in all it's glory.
Heck, it's not as though you have no choice people! This is not censorship, it is choice.
Slashdot Mirror
At least, not any more.
And therefore there is just 'one type of person'. heh. Now my head realy does hurt. :-)
Therefore it would follow that;
Base3 _ Base10
00 ____ 0
01 ____ 1
02 ____ 2
10 ____ 3 (What I was looking for)
11 ____ 4
And so on.
Or have I mistranslated somewhere? How have you understood it?
But what if I do find a bug that I do report, is it then fixed if I do report it after I've reported it? Or something.
My head hurts, I think I'll go and lie down now.
Just a thought.
Oh yes... if you want a puppy, start out by asking for a pony.
Of course, this 'puppy' will no doubt grow into quite a large bull-mastif. *sigh*
Consider for a moment, when you breath in you expand your chest and abdomen to compensate for the volume of air in your lungs. Conversely your chest and abdomen contract when breathing out.
It seems to me that you would end up breathing in very fast, and labour to breath out. You'd end up exhausted just from breathing. Either that or I'm missing something fundamental here.
umm, yes I do. However I don't have the right to download nonfree music.
They had to dig down next to her, and then cut in with the water jet, through solid rock, before they could yank her out by her foot.
Amazing story.
It's gonna be like a wet tshirt competition, but without the tshirts.
heh.
Around about when they claim they don't have access to the underlying operating system.
Was that tagline specific for this story, or simply co-incidence? Very approproate! ;-)
Oh I can see it now; 'Gecko-man...Gecko-man...does whatever a Gecko can...'
No, somehow it doesn't have quite the same ring to it. Oh well.
It's the same model as I have hanging from my ceiling.
So obviously he's either consolidating a number of his hobbies, or he's supposed to be cleaning out his garage. :-)
;-)
*cut to scene of smoke seeping out of the side of the computer*
So I suppose signing them (in Oz) is almost harmless, sans the nuicence value of defending the court case. *sigh*
Are they just getting rid of execs, or overpaid prima donnas?
Not that it means anything I suppose, but it's amusing how blatantly obvious it is that it's not the entertainers (singers, etc) but rather the **AA who are out for blood.
I wonder what would happen if one of their own were found to have a collection of unlicenced music. Any bets on if it would even see the light of day?
Far more interesting, I would think.
I I think think this this might might be be a a duplicate duplicate
Whose side? I'd take the side of Clean Flicks any day, and not necessarily because I advocate censorship. If Clean Flicks offer an alternative 'version' of the film, then I have the choice of which to purchase (or hire?). If I prefer not to see certain content, then I may choose to purchase it from Clean Flicks, or I could still buy it from the usual channels if I want the original in all it's glory.
Heck, it's not as though you have no choice people! This is not censorship, it is choice.
By the way, censorship is evil.
I wonder if he's been hit by a Windows worm? That'd be funny.