Chill... Going for a coffee that morning was not more important than your life either. That is not what people choose on the day of their accident. Its about convenience Vs risk otherwise... well there is no alternative.
Police know that. Once tested positive, you are asked to wait and retested. You then are taken to the police station and tested again. Listerine will not get you a conviction. Road side breath testing is just the beginning of the process.
Is this a case of reverse "think of the children" argument... !!
We have a case where a London judge is siding with the whole British Phonographic Industry.
Well well... what do you know, them London judges wanting to support the commercial exploitation of young women (and men and trained pets depending on what floats your boat) I think they should all be behind the same bars:P
Or create a bottle with two compartments, the top one being drinkable. I can think of a few ways to make the boundary invisible. Example... bottle in bottle, artwork on bottle and so on...
A minuscule percentage of the "break down in sunlight" bags actually do as they mostly get buried. In fact once buried deep enough nothing breaks down as no bacteria survive. They dug up a chicken bone meat and all after 50 years from a landfill.
This goes right next to these heavy green bags that replace the cheap disposable bags. The reality is that disposable bags get used again at least to hold rubbish. The reusable often do not and even they are 28 bags worth of plastic/energy most commonly used only a couple of times.
In every disaster you will always find somebody that predicted it and that includes clairvoyants. If these guys did not have a strong enough case, there where up against the others that made a better case then them. NASA should and has been held accountable for its wrongs. Do not forget that going to space is hard, real hard and NASA designed and flew the space shuttle which was the most complex machine by a margin and it hardly had any prototypes.
The other options are spend a hell of a lot more money ensuring safer rides or don't go (or possibly fix what is wrong with NASA).
I think NASA a has a good balance considering its successes and now the private sector is being baby stepped into taking some of the roles.
I downloaded it to try it out, and straight away I could not view part of a website I did not realise had flash. Its not an obsessions, I may not even like flash... I need it to traverse the internet
So what... they will offer 100 million or call it an Apad and be done. China is a world upon it's own... This is a game theory type gamble with Apple holding the most valuable card. The company can call the bluff and choose from 100 million and zero.
It will be called an Apad for about a year, and the company will come begging for 100 million. Then apple will give 60million just for the principal, and nobody will remember it.
Off course you can create mass. It is piss easy... all you need is energy. Mass energy appears to be conserved in the universe, but having one you can create the other.
Yea but then the adversaries are the most technologically capable in history as well. Scanners that can look through 6" of steel you say ? Does everybody have to take their shoes off as well ? Such statements tickle the fancy of hackers that have no negative motives but love a challenge.
Then again... getting on that wonder list for the sake of a prank might hamper their next flight to comic con.
1. Science does not know "why" in the way religions answers the question. It is a human need to answer the "why". Science comes up with a theory that can be used to predict events in a causal manner. That is it's job. The why predicates a motive/reason and nature from sciences perspective does not have motives. We should not mix the "how" something happens with the "why" something happens. It is a delicate difference.
2. Until a decade or so ago religion was picking a fight with science and science was not responding. In the last decade a small group in "science" has been fighting back and answering the attacks using logic and the scientific method as tools. It seems to be more and more effective with the rise of skepticism and rationality. Its a long way, but I think there's no stopping. I would say that the church is getting uncomfortable. If it doesn't fight it does not stand up to it's doctrine, if it does fight it stirs up a response it is not equipped to fight.
Israel developed nukes and nobody flipped an eyelid, and put them in Subs so no penetrating bomb can get to them. Isreal and the US use the word Iran quite often when talking military hardware. Case in point... our bomb is too small in case we need to go against Iran.
Iran would be nuts not to develop nukes and point them to Israel for no other reason other than the mad principal.
Actually... this is close to already the case. If you buys a car you get free keys thrown in. Try loosing one of those keys. I had to replace my Mazda 3 key. $700 later I had a shiny new key. At this point, I can sell the car with the key so we are not quite there yet... but we are close
I makes perfect economic sense, it does not make political sense. If political terms are only 3-4 years long and voters memory much shorter, their is no incentive to do things over the long term. On the other side, if you go to the hardware store everything has the word enviro in the name or in the body of the description. What the hell is an enviro-peg that is a half foot long sharp plastic stick ?!?!
Well does this mean that if a company takes out a bogus patent it runs the risk in the future of damages? This might be a fair mechanism to slow down patent trolls because the act of taking out as patent is also a potential risk as well as a reward.
Are you nuts... things made in the 80s where a lot more unreliable. You have natural selection bias. Everything you still have from the 80s still alive is the sample you draw your conclusion. Objects have become a lot more reliable and cost less money.
If I use Gmail, can my isp trace to whom I send emails ?
These guys are creating a network with waited relationships between us all.
If he is classified with a threat lever of 0.9 and my link to him is valued as 0.7 which is figured out by the frequency and timing of the emails and my relationships to other members he is related to that means I am a threat level of 0.63.
Bogus email accounts simply end up with very small threat levels although a bogus email account would carry some weight on account of the fact that you created it for a particular purpose.
If google can complete the search box in real time as we type, I am sure a tiny budget is required to calculate all out weightings.
Slashdot Mirror
> No, they checked already in 1960, there is nothing but bottom dwelling invertebrates there too.
lawyer convention ?
<insert rim shot >
Open heart surgery first happened in 1960, do you doubt that today's performances are not cutting edge ?
At one point in time ... every living thing will outlive you, think about that.
Chill ... Going for a coffee that morning was not more important than your life either. ... well there is no alternative.
That is not what people choose on the day of their accident.
Its about convenience Vs risk otherwise
Police know that. Once tested positive, you are asked to wait and retested. You then are taken to the police station and tested again. Listerine will not get you a conviction. Road side breath testing is just the beginning of the process.
Is this a case of reverse "think of the children" argument ... !!
... what do you know, them London judges wanting to support the commercial exploitation of young women (and men and trained pets depending on what floats your boat) I think they should all be behind the same bars :P
We have a case where a London judge is siding with the whole British Phonographic Industry.
Well well
I don't think you know what this word suffer actually means. Suffering through maths class is not da same as Muscular dystrophy.
Or create a bottle with two compartments, the top one being drinkable. I can think of a few ways to make the boundary invisible. Example ... bottle in bottle, artwork on bottle and so on ...
The green movement is so full of cow dung.
A minuscule percentage of the "break down in sunlight" bags actually do as they mostly get buried. In fact once buried deep enough nothing breaks down as no bacteria survive. They dug up a chicken bone meat and all after 50 years from a landfill.
This goes right next to these heavy green bags that replace the cheap disposable bags. The reality is that disposable bags get used again at least to hold rubbish. The reusable often do not and even they are 28 bags worth of plastic/energy most commonly used only a couple of times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reusable_shopping_bag#Research
In every disaster you will always find somebody that predicted it and that includes clairvoyants. If these guys did not have a strong enough case, there where up against the others that made a better case then them. NASA should and has been held accountable for its wrongs. Do not forget that going to space is hard, real hard and NASA designed and flew the space shuttle which was the most complex machine by a margin and it hardly had any prototypes.
The other options are spend a hell of a lot more money ensuring safer rides or don't go (or possibly fix what is wrong with NASA).
I think NASA a has a good balance considering its successes and now the private sector is being baby stepped into taking some of the roles.
I downloaded it to try it out, and straight away I could not view part of a website I did not realise had flash. ... I need it to traverse the internet
Its not an obsessions, I may not even like flash
So what ... they will offer 100 million or call it an Apad and be done. China is a world upon it's own ...
This is a game theory type gamble with Apple holding the most valuable card.
The company can call the bluff and choose from 100 million and zero.
It will be called an Apad for about a year, and the company will come begging for 100 million.
Then apple will give 60million just for the principal, and nobody will remember it.
Off course you can create mass. It is piss easy ... all you need is energy.
Mass energy appears to be conserved in the universe, but having one you can create the other.
Yea but then the adversaries are the most technologically capable in history as well.
... getting on that wonder list for the sake of a prank might hamper their next flight to comic con.
Scanners that can look through 6" of steel you say ?
Does everybody have to take their shoes off as well ?
Such statements tickle the fancy of hackers that have no negative motives but love a challenge.
Then again
I have made two realizations
1. Science does not know "why" in the way religions answers the question. It is a human need to answer the "why".
Science comes up with a theory that can be used to predict events in a causal manner. That is it's job. The why predicates a motive/reason and nature from sciences perspective does not have motives. We should not mix the "how" something happens with the "why" something happens. It is a delicate difference.
2. Until a decade or so ago religion was picking a fight with science and science was not responding. In the last decade a small group in "science" has been fighting back and answering the attacks using logic and the scientific method as tools. It seems to be more and more effective with the rise of skepticism and rationality. Its a long way, but I think there's no stopping. I would say that the church is getting uncomfortable. If it doesn't fight it does not stand up to it's doctrine, if it does fight it stirs up a response it is not equipped to fight.
Israel developed nukes and nobody flipped an eyelid, and put them in Subs so no penetrating bomb can get to them. ... our bomb is too small in case we need to go against Iran.
Isreal and the US use the word Iran quite often when talking military hardware. Case in point
Iran would be nuts not to develop nukes and point them to Israel for no other reason other than the mad principal.
Actually ... this is close to already the case. If you buys a car you get free keys thrown in. Try loosing one of those keys. I had to replace my Mazda 3 key. $700 later I had a shiny new key. At this point, I can sell the car with the key so we are not quite there yet ... but we are close
I makes perfect economic sense, it does not make political sense. If political terms are only 3-4 years long and voters memory much shorter, their is no incentive to do things over the long term. On the other side, if you go to the hardware store everything has the word enviro in the name or in the body of the description. What the hell is an enviro-peg that is a half foot long sharp plastic stick ?!?!
Well does this mean that if a company takes out a bogus patent it runs the risk in the future of damages?
This might be a fair mechanism to slow down patent trolls because the act of taking out as patent is also a potential risk as well as a reward.
Are you nuts ... things made in the 80s where a lot more unreliable. You have natural selection bias. Everything you still have from the 80s still alive is the sample you draw your conclusion. Objects have become a lot more reliable and cost less money.
If I use Gmail, can my isp trace to whom I send emails ?
These guys are creating a network with waited relationships between us all.
If he is classified with a threat lever of 0.9 and my link to him is valued as 0.7 which is figured out by the frequency and timing of the emails and my relationships to other members he is related to that means I am a threat level of 0.63.
Bogus email accounts simply end up with very small threat levels although a bogus email account would carry some weight on account of the fact that you created it for a particular purpose.
If google can complete the search box in real time as we type, I am sure a tiny budget is required to calculate all out weightings.
One that reviles the contents, ... once entered destroys the contents ?
... it is ... "BIG RED BUTTON"
:-)
and one
My password, sure
In your next comment you tell the cop he is in trouble for destroying evidence
Dead spot on ... vote up moderators. How can the above post have a "0".
...
Replace sheep with dude with gun that wants to run red lights when he chooses ?
Have gun, will travel
(a) Sharks don't have sonars;
But they have lasers
(b) Would you really want to train a shark?
Yes
So hang on a second, how come I can't virtualise mac os x on my windows PC then ?