She has a biographical page which claims trans, but I don't know if it's legit. According to the FBI report she was a "grievance collector", i.e., SJW.
What does any of it have to do with any shooting? Yes, that's the real question. We ignore the shooters politics and religion when it's left or muslim, and focus on it when it's not?
"Please don't let this be one of the gun channel people". It wasn't of course. Just a peaceful California vegan/animal rights activist nut bar angry over not enough people getting to see her homemade music and bunny rabbit videos.
A vegan trans immigrant SJW, in fact. Actually, I think I'll change my sig, as the irony is humorous.
Most things are radioactive, but bananas are more radioactive than most things (as are a couple other high-potassium foods). I don't understand what you're on about. If you measure the radioactivity of a banana, it's quite a bit higher than most things in daily life, yet still pretty small (a truck or shipping container of bananas can set of alarms in US ports that detect smuggling of radioactive material).
I did see a guy today clearly running errands while towing a boat. Not a problem as long as we drill, baby, drill. Though in reality hybrids and even full electric cars are becoming mainstream - fairly fast by the standards of change in the automotive world.
We care less and less about oil these days. We'll probably exit the Trump years with minimal oil imports, possibly as a net exporter of oil (as we already are for other fossil fuels). That should bring a welcome change to our foreign policy priorities.
Isn't it that there were economically stable times when currency had an intrinsic value, and quite to contrary - most big financial collapses happened under "modern" economy rules,
No, that's not true. There were some pretty brutal problems before fiat currency. Specie currency is particularly bad. First because the economy grinds to a halt when there aren't enough coins in circulation to mediate barter (this is one factor in the collapse of the Roman Empire - trade deficits mean you run out of currency). Second because the government waters down the currency by coining less pure coins, which makes day-to-day commerce a real pain in the ass. When e.g. a shilling coin has no specific value, but each specific coin must be bartered as to the amount of silver it may or may not contain, well, shopping won't be fast or convenient.
And of course the Great Depression and the previous US economic bubbles (railway, canal) all happened with gold-backed currency.
That's what people usually mean by the phrase, where "mass shooting" is the more general case. Of course, when I was in high school we had a shooting every year, but it wasn't newsworthy - low income inner-city school and all.
Sure, but that's everywhere. Bananas concentrate potassium, which happens to have a certain percentage of K-40. Not sure what point you're trying to make, but bananas are radioactive.
Has there ever been a mass shooting that wasn't in a gun free zone? I can think of only one, that assassination attempt against a senator with a lot of collateral damage.
A better question would be "what if most of the present intenet was DRM-protected?" I'd note that there are plenty of sites that use some JS BS to try to stop you from saving images. The answer of course is "people who cared about that would use the rest of the internet".
What do you do now if you don't want to consume DRM video? You stick with YouTube and torrents and avoid Netflix et al.
You clearly have zero interest in giving this any amount of critical thought. That's fine, you go off and live in your world and the rest of us will stay here, in this one, where reality dictates that technology can't speed up every process.
It might help if you gave an example. There are plenty of things we just dump into the environment because that's the cheapest thing to do, but when that stops scaling we'll have to take care of ourselves.
The first physical limit I see to population is power consumption: while given sufficient technology you can build orbiting solar arrays or fusion plants to enable arbitrarily high power consumption on Earth, the waste heat still gets dumped here. We could move all heavy industry off planet, but that only gets us so much, and personal power consumption (including the power needed to make fertilizer to make food) will eventually hit a wall. But that's vastly beyond the ~10B people the population is projected to crest at.
Which, just like everything else, can be mitigated by technology. Just because we haven't chosen to do so in some area thus far doesn't make it somehow beyond science, it's just means people are cheap.
Fair enough, lable it as GMO and label products made with it as GMO.
That falsely paints GMO foods as dangerous. Instead, let's label "organic" food as "organic", to make the hippies happy. Regulating that "organic" label was long overdue, and if "non-GMO" isn't one of the requirements, it obviously should be.
Bananas are not radioactive. There might be a region where bananas suck in Cesium... but if the soil where they grow have no such Cesium, they can not suck it in. In other words: the Cesium is radioactive. Would be the same with cow milk from the same area.
Bananas are radioactive, mostly from the potassium 40. They aren't very radioactive, which is why the "banana-equivalent dose" is more than just a joke: it helps put radiation exposure in context.
Or, you know, just have sufficient investments to pay the rent. If you want to be successful in life, you need to understand investing - don't be the guy who can only manage to save money as equity. Renting or owning then becomes a decision on its own merits as an investment. Even owning a house outright has a lot of fixed costs.
Rule of thumb: if houses in the area sell for 100 months' rent (for a reasonably-equivalent place), buy ASAP. If houses in the area sell for 200 months' rent, keep renting. In between? Depends on the deal you can get on the house.
Real estate speculation is a whole different topic, but I prefer investment to speculation.
There is no problem with a shortened URL. You're just inflicting your OCD on others. You seem to believe that you can somehow tell if a URL is safe by looking at it. You're wrong. And kinda dumb for believing something so obviously wrong.
But I feel you also missed my point, it's also a matter of choice. Considering that the circadian rhythm of humans isn't dictated by time zones, a person can choose to adjust work habits to 'reset' their circadian rhythm to match a responsible pattern that's inline with a standard work day
Easy for you if it's 24 hours. Not so easy if it's 25 hours. Think it through - that's why some people are natural night owls, and morning always seems to come an hour early.
. If a person can't be creative during a standard work day, an intelligent employer would simply seek out an employee that can be creative during the standard work day.
If you're running an assembly line? Sure, it's more important that everyone is productive collectively than individually. But those jobs are better done by robots. If your employees do something even vaguely creative? The best people are 10x as productive as the average people, and if you're a dick about working conditions, you'll be lucky to even get average people.
Slashdot Mirror
She has a biographical page which claims trans, but I don't know if it's legit. According to the FBI report she was a "grievance collector", i.e., SJW.
What does any of it have to do with any shooting? Yes, that's the real question. We ignore the shooters politics and religion when it's left or muslim, and focus on it when it's not?
"Please don't let this be one of the gun channel people". It wasn't of course. Just a peaceful California vegan/animal rights activist nut bar angry over not enough people getting to see her homemade music and bunny rabbit videos.
A vegan trans immigrant SJW, in fact. Actually, I think I'll change my sig, as the irony is humorous.
Most things are radioactive, but bananas are more radioactive than most things (as are a couple other high-potassium foods). I don't understand what you're on about. If you measure the radioactivity of a banana, it's quite a bit higher than most things in daily life, yet still pretty small (a truck or shipping container of bananas can set of alarms in US ports that detect smuggling of radioactive material).
I did see a guy today clearly running errands while towing a boat. Not a problem as long as we drill, baby, drill. Though in reality hybrids and even full electric cars are becoming mainstream - fairly fast by the standards of change in the automotive world.
We care less and less about oil these days. We'll probably exit the Trump years with minimal oil imports, possibly as a net exporter of oil (as we already are for other fossil fuels). That should bring a welcome change to our foreign policy priorities.
Isn't it that there were economically stable times when currency had an intrinsic value, and quite to contrary - most big financial collapses happened under "modern" economy rules,
No, that's not true. There were some pretty brutal problems before fiat currency. Specie currency is particularly bad. First because the economy grinds to a halt when there aren't enough coins in circulation to mediate barter (this is one factor in the collapse of the Roman Empire - trade deficits mean you run out of currency). Second because the government waters down the currency by coining less pure coins, which makes day-to-day commerce a real pain in the ass. When e.g. a shilling coin has no specific value, but each specific coin must be bartered as to the amount of silver it may or may not contain, well, shopping won't be fast or convenient.
And of course the Great Depression and the previous US economic bubbles (railway, canal) all happened with gold-backed currency.
That's what people usually mean by the phrase, where "mass shooting" is the more general case. Of course, when I was in high school we had a shooting every year, but it wasn't newsworthy - low income inner-city school and all.
Sure, but that's everywhere. Bananas concentrate potassium, which happens to have a certain percentage of K-40. Not sure what point you're trying to make, but bananas are radioactive.
Has there ever been a mass shooting that wasn't in a gun free zone? I can think of only one, that assassination attempt against a senator with a lot of collateral damage.
Some are.
Let me guess: "the Jews"? Or did you mean some other group of people who you have a final solution in mind for?
Those are high schools then, are they?
A better question would be "what if most of the present intenet was DRM-protected?" I'd note that there are plenty of sites that use some JS BS to try to stop you from saving images. The answer of course is "people who cared about that would use the rest of the internet".
What do you do now if you don't want to consume DRM video? You stick with YouTube and torrents and avoid Netflix et al.
And why is the population projected to crest at that point? I could give you the fish, but it'll be better for you if you learn to fish for yourself.
You're an arrogant little fuck, aren't you. Protip: you're kinda dumb, and shouldn't try to school your betters.
You clearly have zero interest in giving this any amount of critical thought. That's fine, you go off and live in your world and the rest of us will stay here, in this one, where reality dictates that technology can't speed up every process.
It might help if you gave an example. There are plenty of things we just dump into the environment because that's the cheapest thing to do, but when that stops scaling we'll have to take care of ourselves.
The first physical limit I see to population is power consumption: while given sufficient technology you can build orbiting solar arrays or fusion plants to enable arbitrarily high power consumption on Earth, the waste heat still gets dumped here. We could move all heavy industry off planet, but that only gets us so much, and personal power consumption (including the power needed to make fertilizer to make food) will eventually hit a wall. But that's vastly beyond the ~10B people the population is projected to crest at.
OK, sure, at some point the physical volume of the Earth becomes the limiting factor, but that's not the sort of limit we were talking about.
Which, just like everything else, can be mitigated by technology. Just because we haven't chosen to do so in some area thus far doesn't make it somehow beyond science, it's just means people are cheap.
Wait, so "proteins" are the new "chemicals"? Well, you can be sure that all your chemical-free foods are also safe from proteins.
Fair enough, lable it as GMO and label products made with it as GMO.
That falsely paints GMO foods as dangerous. Instead, let's label "organic" food as "organic", to make the hippies happy. Regulating that "organic" label was long overdue, and if "non-GMO" isn't one of the requirements, it obviously should be.
Bananas are not radioactive. ... but if the soil where they grow have no such Cesium, they can not suck it in.
There might be a region where bananas suck in Cesium
In other words: the Cesium is radioactive. Would be the same with cow milk from the same area.
Bananas are radioactive, mostly from the potassium 40. They aren't very radioactive, which is why the "banana-equivalent dose" is more than just a joke: it helps put radiation exposure in context.
The number of people the planet can support is limited only by technology. Technology grows exponentially. Population looks to be leveling off.
Or, you know, just have sufficient investments to pay the rent. If you want to be successful in life, you need to understand investing - don't be the guy who can only manage to save money as equity. Renting or owning then becomes a decision on its own merits as an investment. Even owning a house outright has a lot of fixed costs.
Rule of thumb: if houses in the area sell for 100 months' rent (for a reasonably-equivalent place), buy ASAP. If houses in the area sell for 200 months' rent, keep renting. In between? Depends on the deal you can get on the house.
Real estate speculation is a whole different topic, but I prefer investment to speculation.
There is no problem with a shortened URL. You're just inflicting your OCD on others. You seem to believe that you can somehow tell if a URL is safe by looking at it. You're wrong. And kinda dumb for believing something so obviously wrong.
Well, go on being an abusive prick then, if you're just too dumb to understand that not everyone is the same as you.
If it goes to some web site you're not familiar with, then what?
If your PC is secure, you can click on anything safely. If it's not, then the banner ads on the most familiar website will infect you.
But I feel you also missed my point, it's also a matter of choice. Considering that the circadian rhythm of humans isn't dictated by time zones, a person can choose to adjust work habits to 'reset' their circadian rhythm to match a responsible pattern that's inline with a standard work day
Easy for you if it's 24 hours. Not so easy if it's 25 hours. Think it through - that's why some people are natural night owls, and morning always seems to come an hour early.
. If a person can't be creative during a standard work day, an intelligent employer would simply seek out an employee that can be creative during the standard work day.
If you're running an assembly line? Sure, it's more important that everyone is productive collectively than individually. But those jobs are better done by robots. If your employees do something even vaguely creative? The best people are 10x as productive as the average people, and if you're a dick about working conditions, you'll be lucky to even get average people.