No American airline currently says anything about airplane mode, and neither has any Canadian airline I've flown. They all say the same thing, something to the effect of "Turn off all electronics"
They know how to do it. They just don't care. It's not going to affect the airplane and the loss of battery life is negligible, unless you have a phone with poor battery life, where it wouldn't make a difference in the first place.
It's hard to beat free.Wish the article had touched on "traditional tools" a little more. They didn't really go into specifics. I've got some experience there, but it would have been nice to see their take on it.
Hell it's legal to do it without the proper licenses -- minus NFA weapons -- as long as you don't do it for the purpose of reselling. If you do sell a weapon or two -- as long as you're not doing it as a means of living -- all you need to do is slap a serial # on there.
*I* didn't say anything. An AC posted that, so I'm going to assume you're either an idiot or cannot read.
You started with some general statements about telecommuting for work. Then you gave an anecdotal evidence in the form of yahoo. You then followed it up with more general statements about telecommuting. He gave anecdotal evidence from his experience, which contradicted the Yahoo telecommuting experience. His situation is directly comparable. It's telecommuting. Unless Yahoo invented a new way to telecommute, then his experience is just as valid as what you trotted out.
Just because you think some narrow window and company experience can't be contradicted or different from other situations, doesn't mean it shouldn't be compared to it. Get off your fucking high horse. You look like an idiot. There are a finite number of ways for workers to produce work and communicate it back to the company at a different physical location. You're basically saying something to the effect of "MPG only matters for cars, not trucks, because trucks don't do the *exact* same thing as cars. They can haul stuff AND people instead of just people. See they are totally different!!!"
You come off like a child who lacks any type of critical thinking skills, a drunk, angry child at that.
Telecommuting can work just fine for a large number of workers. It also helps if that someone can concentrate enough to properly spell. Quality of work and amount of work produced can suffer if someone telecommutes and they are not properly managed. If management remains engaged, the worker will produce or they shouldn't have been allowed to telecommute in the first place.
The OP makes no mention of New Zealand. The OP is referring back to this shit stain of a post, which is talking about the fifth amendment and the US. About three layers down, someone mentions New Zealand. He actually mentions the US before he mentions NZ. I can point you to the relevant passage if you want.
No you said a suspect, not an innocent person. Huge difference, and one you apparently don't understand.
Stick to mathematics and leave civics to people who passed it in high school.
For one glaringly simple reason, the defendant can and probably will get charged with a lot of other things (perjury, obstruction, et al) if they lie to a police officer instead of invoke their fifth amendment rights. It would also look a hell of a lot worse to see than interrogation play in court followed immediately contradictory evidence, definitely a lot worse than someone choosing not to testify or answer questions.
As much as I love the NSA looking through email and phone records, I would prefer that the had to *at least* work for it. Trusted Computing (What a crock BTW) says it can be turned off, but does anyone know how? Fosnez 07:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Way to aim high there. We went from the first uses of gunpowder to having a satellite leaving the solar system in under 1000 years. That doesn't even touch us landing on the moon and having multiple space stations orbiting earth at the same time.
If I'm not able to do the Kessel Run in fewer than 12 parsecs by the end of this millennium, I will be *very*disappointed.
Slashdot Mirror
Answer: Reinforced cockpit doors and an attitude of resisting the hijacker(s) instead of expecting a nice Cuban terminal vacation
I with I could edit that to add Mexico as well.
Cool. I've got ~25K miles or so this year, US and Canada. Still have yet to hear any airline mention "airplane mode."
No American airline currently says anything about airplane mode, and neither has any Canadian airline I've flown. They all say the same thing, something to the effect of "Turn off all electronics"
They know how to do it. They just don't care. It's not going to affect the airplane and the loss of battery life is negligible, unless you have a phone with poor battery life, where it wouldn't make a difference in the first place.
I know this is satire, but fuck you
It's hard to beat free.Wish the article had touched on "traditional tools" a little more. They didn't really go into specifics. I've got some experience there, but it would have been nice to see their take on it.
Hell it's legal to do it without the proper licenses -- minus NFA weapons -- as long as you don't do it for the purpose of reselling. If you do sell a weapon or two -- as long as you're not doing it as a means of living -- all you need to do is slap a serial # on there.
*I* didn't say anything. An AC posted that, so I'm going to assume you're either an idiot or cannot read. You started with some general statements about telecommuting for work. Then you gave an anecdotal evidence in the form of yahoo. You then followed it up with more general statements about telecommuting. He gave anecdotal evidence from his experience, which contradicted the Yahoo telecommuting experience. His situation is directly comparable. It's telecommuting. Unless Yahoo invented a new way to telecommute, then his experience is just as valid as what you trotted out. Just because you think some narrow window and company experience can't be contradicted or different from other situations, doesn't mean it shouldn't be compared to it. Get off your fucking high horse. You look like an idiot. There are a finite number of ways for workers to produce work and communicate it back to the company at a different physical location. You're basically saying something to the effect of "MPG only matters for cars, not trucks, because trucks don't do the *exact* same thing as cars. They can haul stuff AND people instead of just people. See they are totally different!!!" You come off like a child who lacks any type of critical thinking skills, a drunk, angry child at that.
Telecommuting can work just fine for a large number of workers. It also helps if that someone can concentrate enough to properly spell. Quality of work and amount of work produced can suffer if someone telecommutes and they are not properly managed. If management remains engaged, the worker will produce or they shouldn't have been allowed to telecommute in the first place.
How is it not comparable? You can't just say something is irrelevant without actually saying why.
The OP makes no mention of New Zealand. The OP is referring back to this shit stain of a post, which is talking about the fifth amendment and the US. About three layers down, someone mentions New Zealand. He actually mentions the US before he mentions NZ. I can point you to the relevant passage if you want.
No you said a suspect, not an innocent person. Huge difference, and one you apparently don't understand. Stick to mathematics and leave civics to people who passed it in high school.
I know this is a hard concept to grasp, but lying and invoking your right to avoid self-incrimination are not the same thing.
For one glaringly simple reason, the defendant can and probably will get charged with a lot of other things (perjury, obstruction, et al) if they lie to a police officer instead of invoke their fifth amendment rights. It would also look a hell of a lot worse to see than interrogation play in court followed immediately contradictory evidence, definitely a lot worse than someone choosing not to testify or answer questions.
Sure thing hoss http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/technology/29phones.html
Just the sheer number of flights without any interference (you know millions yearly) makes it pretty obvious.
What percentage of TOR traffic is US-based?
I will give you a hint: It's a lot. There's a reason TOR started out as a DARPA project
Retard Alert
Retard alert
If it gets named Trayvon, it will probably be the first asteroid ever shot down by NASA
The NRA isn't the lobbying organization for the gun manufacturers. That's the NSSF
From Wikipedia's TPM talk page in 2007:
As much as I love the NSA looking through email and phone records, I would prefer that the had to *at least* work for it. Trusted Computing (What a crock BTW) says it can be turned off, but does anyone know how? Fosnez 07:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
If I'm not able to do the Kessel Run in fewer than 12 parsecs by the end of this millennium, I will be *very*disappointed.
If it happens, there is not much you can do about it.