I tried the same thing for the same reasons, and I found the weight loss stopped after about a year. And more exercise didn't help at all. Eventually I had to go to calorie reduction and actually more sugar in order to shed the last 40 pounds.
It is true we understand so little about how the whole thing works. My experience has been exercise is not a very big factor. I exercised a LOT and never lost a pound. Then I got a leg injury and lost 40 pounds (~18 kg) while having no exercise at all. It was all diet. My diet wasn't bad before, but perhaps I was eating too much to try to sustain all the exercise. That's speculation. I did eat a lot fewer calories with the injury. Then I have known other people with a very different experience. So now my best advice is simply, keep trying and be honest with yourself. And always bear in mind that your body weight is not the only reason you are alive.
some 1.5 million workers would be needed in to take part in decontamination efforts in the event of a nuclear mishap, with cleanup costs surging as high as $1 trillion.
So what is the problem? This is called "economic stimulus".
Not correct. I know medical vendors like to use this as an excuse. But the FDA continues to state that software does not need to be recertified except in cases of major changes to the functionality. The manufacturer is still responsible for quality testing however.
Ordinarily, FDA will not need to review software patches before a device manufacturer puts them in place. FDA views most software patches as design changes that manufacturers can make without prior discussion with FDA.......For example, manufacturers need to seek FDA's approval or clearance before installing a software patch if it would change who it’s for, what it does, or how it works (a change in the indication for use), and/or it would make the device less safe and effective.
Just because I can't think of something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I, for one, look forward to the incredible prosperity and freedom possible by using these technologies. And we will think of plenty of new things for these "useless" humans to do.
Rudeness isn't useful. I'll let it go though and point out this isn't an anology. This is a statement that current case law cites previous cases involving combination safes.
The SC has never RULED this. It was mentioned in a different case. However, there is clear precedent in the US in the case law regarding combination safes. The defendant can be compelled to open/unlock in cases where there is clear evidence that relevant items are held by the lock. e.g. if the guy wrote in an email "I keep all that illegal porn on this encrypted volume". One cannot be compelled for a fishing expedition or under the rubric of a more general search warrant. I would guess from the invocation of All Writs that this isn't what happened in the case at hand. Or perhaps as others say it is an attempt to leverage All Writs for a wider precedent. I didn't read the case details, though.
There is the possibility of fraud however, if the party membership (as defined by the party) feels this took place they can take responsible parties to court. Also as private individuals. Sadly, the Big Two parties are practically government funded entities, which muddies the water a bit.
And well it should be, if you substitute "populist demagogue" for "grassroots candidate". This isn't the only feature of our government and electoral system that is intended to prevent a movement of mass hysteria from taking over everything over a short period. If all the Sanders supporters care about their issues, they can join the party for a longer period of time, pay their dues, and enact change over time. There are a lot of bad aspects to the notion that some candidate could stir up a lot of people who rush to register as party members for the primary at the last minute then get the nomination.
how long until you can't turn down the volume on them either, even globally? "We're so sorry, this video cannot be viewed with the volume on your device turned below 50%"
Isn't this a bit like saying: I wish I could get the NFL from someone other than the NFL? At a certain point, the content producer has a kind of monopoly because no one else can make or sell it. I mean, I could put on a football game (of whichever sort) in my backyard but it wouldn't be the same.
He just expressed an opinion on Twitter, and did some other stuff. he isn't the one making a "news" story out of it. That said, I really want to know how his bowel movements are going. Way to go for leaving that out, submitter.
It is the same problem with movies. Even if everyone wants something better, everyone thinks 'better' is something different. A producer might make something better, but the audience shrinks. So instead they pander to the lowest common denominator in order to have sufficient viewership. Eventually the producers reach the point where they say, why put in the effort to do something better when they will pay $X each to watch this garbage instead? Hence JJ Abrams' stupid Star Wars|Trek movies.
They explicitly call the government 'socialist' (she hui) and the ruling party is Communist (gong chan). But as you say, the name is irrelevant, the results speak for themselves.
I thought the same thing: "Today, for every $1 earned by men, our female employees in the U.S. earn 99.8 cents at the same job title and level." Isn't this illegal? I wonder if MS will face charges for openly acknowledging illegal gender discrimination.
I didn't see any evidence for this statement. I suppose it is reasonable to assume that if the Internet gains one million users, some small percentage of them will be jerks. But TFA also says:
She said the evidence from the meetings was that social media was overwhelmingly positive for the women and girls
Thomas Jefferson was also convinced there was something wrong with the climate, due to observable changes over his lifetime. And now that I re-read that, I'm not quite sure what my point is.
Slashdot Mirror
I tried the same thing for the same reasons, and I found the weight loss stopped after about a year. And more exercise didn't help at all. Eventually I had to go to calorie reduction and actually more sugar in order to shed the last 40 pounds.
Of course, the term "healthy" is somewhat subjective as well.
It is true we understand so little about how the whole thing works. My experience has been exercise is not a very big factor. I exercised a LOT and never lost a pound. Then I got a leg injury and lost 40 pounds (~18 kg) while having no exercise at all. It was all diet. My diet wasn't bad before, but perhaps I was eating too much to try to sustain all the exercise. That's speculation. I did eat a lot fewer calories with the injury. Then I have known other people with a very different experience. So now my best advice is simply, keep trying and be honest with yourself. And always bear in mind that your body weight is not the only reason you are alive.
Yes, it wasn't clear that I was being tongue-in-cheek
That's a stimulus for medical businesses
some 1.5 million workers would be needed in to take part in decontamination efforts in the event of a nuclear mishap, with cleanup costs surging as high as $1 trillion.
So what is the problem? This is called "economic stimulus".
I would suggest that either you or your partner are just plain doing it wrong.
I have it on good authority that it is me.
Ordinarily, FDA will not need to review software patches before a device manufacturer puts them in place. FDA views most software patches as design changes that manufacturers can make without prior discussion with FDA. ......For example, manufacturers need to seek FDA's approval or clearance before installing a software patch if it would change who it’s for, what it does, or how it works (a change in the indication for use), and/or it would make the device less safe and effective.
Or maybe just suggest an alternative: "When freed from one thing, humans will do other things instead"
Just because I can't think of something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I, for one, look forward to the incredible prosperity and freedom possible by using these technologies. And we will think of plenty of new things for these "useless" humans to do.
Rudeness isn't useful. I'll let it go though and point out this isn't an anology. This is a statement that current case law cites previous cases involving combination safes.
Server versions don't use it by default. There is an option to enable it however.
The SC has never RULED this. It was mentioned in a different case. However, there is clear precedent in the US in the case law regarding combination safes. The defendant can be compelled to open/unlock in cases where there is clear evidence that relevant items are held by the lock. e.g. if the guy wrote in an email "I keep all that illegal porn on this encrypted volume". One cannot be compelled for a fishing expedition or under the rubric of a more general search warrant. I would guess from the invocation of All Writs that this isn't what happened in the case at hand. Or perhaps as others say it is an attempt to leverage All Writs for a wider precedent. I didn't read the case details, though.
There is the possibility of fraud however, if the party membership (as defined by the party) feels this took place they can take responsible parties to court. Also as private individuals. Sadly, the Big Two parties are practically government funded entities, which muddies the water a bit.
And well it should be, if you substitute "populist demagogue" for "grassroots candidate". This isn't the only feature of our government and electoral system that is intended to prevent a movement of mass hysteria from taking over everything over a short period. If all the Sanders supporters care about their issues, they can join the party for a longer period of time, pay their dues, and enact change over time. There are a lot of bad aspects to the notion that some candidate could stir up a lot of people who rush to register as party members for the primary at the last minute then get the nomination.
how long until you can't turn down the volume on them either, even globally? "We're so sorry, this video cannot be viewed with the volume on your device turned below 50%"
That's why this is just a call for discussion or something like that. No bans or regulations
Isn't this a bit like saying: I wish I could get the NFL from someone other than the NFL? At a certain point, the content producer has a kind of monopoly because no one else can make or sell it. I mean, I could put on a football game (of whichever sort) in my backyard but it wouldn't be the same.
He just expressed an opinion on Twitter, and did some other stuff. he isn't the one making a "news" story out of it. That said, I really want to know how his bowel movements are going. Way to go for leaving that out, submitter.
Another reason I get my phones from China, where all I have to worry about is the Chinese government spying on me.
It is the same problem with movies. Even if everyone wants something better, everyone thinks 'better' is something different. A producer might make something better, but the audience shrinks. So instead they pander to the lowest common denominator in order to have sufficient viewership. Eventually the producers reach the point where they say, why put in the effort to do something better when they will pay $X each to watch this garbage instead? Hence JJ Abrams' stupid Star Wars|Trek movies.
They explicitly call the government 'socialist' (she hui) and the ruling party is Communist (gong chan). But as you say, the name is irrelevant, the results speak for themselves.
I thought the same thing: "Today, for every $1 earned by men, our female employees in the U.S. earn 99.8 cents at the same job title and level." Isn't this illegal? I wonder if MS will face charges for openly acknowledging illegal gender discrimination.
the scale of abuse online continues to increase
I didn't see any evidence for this statement. I suppose it is reasonable to assume that if the Internet gains one million users, some small percentage of them will be jerks. But TFA also says:
She said the evidence from the meetings was that social media was overwhelmingly positive for the women and girls
Thomas Jefferson was also convinced there was something wrong with the climate, due to observable changes over his lifetime. And now that I re-read that, I'm not quite sure what my point is.