Must be a nice feeling for companies knowing that you can rely on self-imposed unpaid slaves working in their free time to fix their very own screw-ups.
Just shows the inefficiency of the whole organisation.
Same thing with the downloadpanel mentioned below.
First mockups in 2010, Safari released in in 2011, and it got added in Firefox sometime in 2013.
Slashdot Mirror
"without any real warning at all"
Wrong. That time you added an exception back in 2013 was the warning. Now deal with it.
It also blocks autoplaying HTML5-videos, or at least did so some time ago.
Great, another reason to switch to Chrome.
Funny, how nobody seems to pick up this point. Indeed, we are already paying the 230 bucks.
Cyberlink PowerDVD, iirc.
It's bundling McAfee when you download the Flash player with Firefox, but it's bundling Chrome when you download it in IE. :)
"unauthorized tethering"
Land of the free!
and would pay for itself in power savings within a year.
Your math is way off.
Why is this rated -1?
Why buy a device with a broken OS which you have to fix yourself?
WebM?
The only things missing now are buyers and users.
They've also shot down the data retention directive recently, so it's really two for three.
Probably for the same reason they want to get cash from Google for registering their sites for Google News: Greed.
They disabled nothing, upcoming patches will just require 8.1u1.
This gotta be the third or fourth developer-focused FirefoxOS-device. When are there going to be some consumer-focused devices?
The more important question is: Why would you develop for FirefoxOS in the first place?
Last time I checked the iPhones had a home-button.
I'm definitely having a "prurient interest" right now.
Must be a nice feeling for companies knowing that you can rely on self-imposed unpaid slaves working in their free time to fix their very own screw-ups.
Just shows the inefficiency of the whole organisation.
Same thing with the downloadpanel mentioned below.
First mockups in 2010, Safari released in in 2011, and it got added in Firefox sometime in 2013.
No, why? Chrome was in it.
Considering the article, wouldn't it be kinda obvious why firefox got hacked? The source code is available.
So are most parts of Chrome, including the sandbox.
Released? None.
Sold to the highest bidder? Most.
Nice to see security-research becoming a racketeering operation.
Why are you using Flash for Youtube in Firefox?