I agree, but that doesn't change the fact that your initial response of "Ridiculous" to the claim that "playing content requires the ability to duplicate that content" was misguided.
Because those are technologies aimed to protect the path of those necessary digital copies. The photons from the screen still need to travel through the air though, and there's nothing stopping you pointing a camera at it.
It may benchmark well, but it just feels so damn slow. The UI is often unresponsive when I try to scroll after initially loading a page, and any time something uses flash (usually ads), the UI hangs long enough that I get a brief "not responding" notification.
Except the electron actually can tunnel to the other side even when the transistor is turned off. Arguing whether you can or can't observe it passing through the blockade is moot, when all you care about is failing to stop the electron from passing through.
Lack of mainstream support pretty much just means that new features won't be backported. Most businesses operate on a 3 year cycle, as long as they start migrating to a newer OS for new machines by 2017 then there shouldn't be a problem.
What's the power density? (Amount of energy delivered over time)
That's not power density. That's just power. Power density is how much power (energy delivered over time) it can deliver per unit volume of battery. That's really only of concern for high power applications such as an electric race car. For most usages, energy density is far more valuable.
The difference between project hosting and a "service to host and edit source code repositories" is a few wiki pages for a description and documentation.
So your service will randomly fail to start, depending upon whether the local system's "init" just happened to start the services yours depends upon before your's?
That... doesn't seem like a good idea to me. While I'd certainly ensure my scripts handle the non-startup of dependencies gracefully, I'd definitely want a sane init system to actually know what to start up, and in what order.
Uh, no, the whole point is that the service checks for the dependency, and if it's met, then all good, and if it's not met, it requests the dependency to be started.
Microsoft needs to pay royalties on the codecs included in WMC for every copy they ship. Very few users actually use it, so Microsoft was spending a ton of cash on codecs they don't need. That's why WMC was removed from Windows 8 by default, requiring an upgrade code (for tracking the codec royalties). Perhaps the demand for the Windows 8 upgrade code was too low to make it worth their effort, so they dropped it completely.
Slashdot Mirror
No. If that's what you're after, you'll need to skip Broadwell and wait for Skylake.
That's why I always just open links in new tabs, and if I get an interstitial, I just close the tab.
I agree, but that doesn't change the fact that your initial response of "Ridiculous" to the claim that "playing content requires the ability to duplicate that content" was misguided.
Or you could run the software in a VM and have the host OS capture the screenshot, if they manage to implement invasive DRM.
Because those are technologies aimed to protect the path of those necessary digital copies. The photons from the screen still need to travel through the air though, and there's nothing stopping you pointing a camera at it.
It may benchmark well, but it just feels so damn slow. The UI is often unresponsive when I try to scroll after initially loading a page, and any time something uses flash (usually ads), the UI hangs long enough that I get a brief "not responding" notification.
Except the electron actually can tunnel to the other side even when the transistor is turned off. Arguing whether you can or can't observe it passing through the blockade is moot, when all you care about is failing to stop the electron from passing through.
They are still compulsory, eventually. You only get to delay the upgrade.
Google even tried a free email replacement called Wave. That didn't catch on either.
Look at Intel, for crying out loud. Has there been anything really interesting / exciting coming out from Intel for the past decades??
The Core micro-architecture was within the last decade and that was very interesting and exciting. Sandy Bridge was also a pretty good milestone.
Judge Hellerstein is on a roll.
The timing is awful, this was essentially just banned in New Zealand.
Lack of mainstream support pretty much just means that new features won't be backported. Most businesses operate on a 3 year cycle, as long as they start migrating to a newer OS for new machines by 2017 then there shouldn't be a problem.
Which doesn't help me if the phone doesn't last 2 years.
What's the power density? (Amount of energy delivered over time)
That's not power density. That's just power. Power density is how much power (energy delivered over time) it can deliver per unit volume of battery. That's really only of concern for high power applications such as an electric race car. For most usages, energy density is far more valuable.
I'm not sure why you view changing a battery once or twice a year as such a big deal.
It's because it generally means replacing your whole phone these days.
The difference between project hosting and a "service to host and edit source code repositories" is a few wiki pages for a description and documentation.
You're forgetting about an issue tracker.
They're not really implying that, you're inferring that. You're not entirely wrong, though.
Surely it's pretty obvious that they're implying the mid range cards can't do 4k in a usable fashion. If you want 4k, you want the 4k offerings.
The water cooled Fury X and the Nano both look to put less strain on the PCIe slot than the previous generation cards.
They already have a levy on media such as CDs and DVDs as they are assumed to be used for copyright infringement.
So your service will randomly fail to start, depending upon whether the local system's "init" just happened to start the services yours depends upon before your's?
That... doesn't seem like a good idea to me. While I'd certainly ensure my scripts handle the non-startup of dependencies gracefully, I'd definitely want a sane init system to actually know what to start up, and in what order.
Uh, no, the whole point is that the service checks for the dependency, and if it's met, then all good, and if it's not met, it requests the dependency to be started.
That has absolutely nothing to do with whether a given major OS version had a dedicated SKU for WMC.
Windows 8 had a special WMC SKU too.
Microsoft needs to pay royalties on the codecs included in WMC for every copy they ship. Very few users actually use it, so Microsoft was spending a ton of cash on codecs they don't need. That's why WMC was removed from Windows 8 by default, requiring an upgrade code (for tracking the codec royalties). Perhaps the demand for the Windows 8 upgrade code was too low to make it worth their effort, so they dropped it completely.