Do you? Or are you just parroting Apple's marketing bullshit?
Neither - but you'll notice that I made no claims in my comment, so attacking me on those grounds is pretty damn stupid of you.
Also, it's nice to see someone replied to you and shot your whole argument to shit. I always like when a loudmouth asshole gets ripped to pieces by the masses.
The thing is, with your reasonable interpretation of the facts, there isn't any controversial stupidity that so inflames the nerd rage. Without that wouldn't be so many interestingly indignant comments for me to read with an air of intellectual superiority, granted by understanding the reality of the situation.
Essentially, that would remove about 90% of the reason I come here, so for my sake, begone with your foul logic.
You obviously missed the point of this story. Would you walk into a friend's bedroom while he's masturbating and stand there criticizing the porn he's using for stimulation? Cause that's what you just did here.
Perhaps Garmin or TomTom are supplied by the same company as Apple? Just a thought, I don't really know, but a little logic applied to the situation pokes a big old hole in your righteous indignation.
I'm not entirely sure why a person bringing an action that may or may not succeed to a Maryland court is reason to deride the state. Don't get me wrong, like every good NOVA resident, I'm pretty sure Maryland is the root of all stupidity - but this isn't why at all.
Well shit, you've convinced me. You need handholding, so I should be restricted too. It's all come clear now. I must suffer the loss of personal freedom because you're incapable of making decent decisions.
Thank you for ending the debate. We all can go home now.
Say by legislating you into a criminal for acts that aren't harming anyone but yourself (if that!), then throwing you into prison and making you a ward of the state? I feel safer already. Thanks mama gov't. Thanks papa gov't.
Face it - the War on Drugs has nothing to do with drugs and everything to do with control of the populace to funnel certain types of money to certain lobbying groups. It's an economics war. If it had anything to do with drugs in reality, the numbers are already so bad they would have given up years ago.
LSD could kill with one use, if you took enough. It would be damn hard to find that much unless you synthesize it yourself, but it does have a toxicity level.
But so what? It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves. That's a religious point of view that has no place in a country supposedly run according to a secular constitution.
Your attitude makes almost no sense to me. Could you explain it a little further? I started off assuming it was the usual geek-bullshit "I don't like anything anyone else likes" but your examples don't really fit with that too well.
Slashdot Mirror
As Stewie Griffin once said, "apparently the razor wasn't invented until the late 80s"
Choke that chicken!
Whip that weasel!
Spank that monkey!
Crank that shaft!
I do so love these articles. You rabid anti-Microsofties never disappoint me.
Neither - but you'll notice that I made no claims in my comment, so attacking me on those grounds is pretty damn stupid of you.
Also, it's nice to see someone replied to you and shot your whole argument to shit. I always like when a loudmouth asshole gets ripped to pieces by the masses.
Lighten up, Francis.
I have to wonder why people with no sense of humor bother to comment in the idle section.
Do you have anything in the way of facts to back up your statement, or are you just spouting an uninformed opinion about a technical matter?
The thing is, with your reasonable interpretation of the facts, there isn't any controversial stupidity that so inflames the nerd rage. Without that wouldn't be so many interestingly indignant comments for me to read with an air of intellectual superiority, granted by understanding the reality of the situation.
Essentially, that would remove about 90% of the reason I come here, so for my sake, begone with your foul logic.
I suspect when you look at things, you see exactly what you were looking for in the first place.
You obviously missed the point of this story. Would you walk into a friend's bedroom while he's masturbating and stand there criticizing the porn he's using for stimulation? Cause that's what you just did here.
So when you buy multiple services from them, they offer a discount? My word, the nerve, trying to make money like that.
Complaining is fine, but at a certain number of posts, it becomes whining.
Perhaps Garmin or TomTom are supplied by the same company as Apple? Just a thought, I don't really know, but a little logic applied to the situation pokes a big old hole in your righteous indignation.
I'm not entirely sure why a person bringing an action that may or may not succeed to a Maryland court is reason to deride the state. Don't get me wrong, like every good NOVA resident, I'm pretty sure Maryland is the root of all stupidity - but this isn't why at all.
The web disagrees with you, and given the nature of logic, the web wins the argument.
No, you're supposed to not stream Netflix to your device.
Not sure where your attitude of entitlement comes from, but since you have it, just pirate. This is a lovely justification for people like you.
And you can't tax a distillate you can make in your bathtub.
Please don't be on my side of the argument and put forth such retarded statements. I hate agreeing with stupid people.
Well shit, you've convinced me. You need handholding, so I should be restricted too. It's all come clear now. I must suffer the loss of personal freedom because you're incapable of making decent decisions.
Thank you for ending the debate. We all can go home now.
Say by legislating you into a criminal for acts that aren't harming anyone but yourself (if that!), then throwing you into prison and making you a ward of the state? I feel safer already. Thanks mama gov't. Thanks papa gov't.
Face it - the War on Drugs has nothing to do with drugs and everything to do with control of the populace to funnel certain types of money to certain lobbying groups. It's an economics war. If it had anything to do with drugs in reality, the numbers are already so bad they would have given up years ago.
LSD could kill with one use, if you took enough. It would be damn hard to find that much unless you synthesize it yourself, but it does have a toxicity level.
But so what? It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves. That's a religious point of view that has no place in a country supposedly run according to a secular constitution.
So what if it did? That's a personal choice, not a gov't one.
The war on drugs makes a lot of money for a lot people on both sides of the law.
Your attitude makes almost no sense to me. Could you explain it a little further? I started off assuming it was the usual geek-bullshit "I don't like anything anyone else likes" but your examples don't really fit with that too well.
How long before we see anti-patent people come up with a new joke formula?
It's only irrelevant if your purpose is upholding ideals rather than making software.
You must really like those hair care products