I don't know that we're far enough past the real estate boom to say that rich old people are the rule rather than the exception. Many of these people made much of their money selling their old houses to baby boomers. That's not necessarily going to be the case going forward.
For low incomes I thought the best was actually sticking water in discarded plastic bottles and slinging them onto the roof to cook out the nasties with free and plentiful sunlight.
No, there are not. There are ways to use fancy linear algebra like genuine fractals or lanczos to get more pixels out of your image without making it look absolutely horrible. What they will not do is increase the resolved detail of the image. The data simply isn't there to find.
Funny, I've never seen that "increase resolution" button in photoshop before. Either the copy they got for comparison is degraded or we're looking at a different picture, possibly composed from multiple images, with the same pose. Either way the AP did a crappy job of making their point here.
I always heard HP's linux inkjet drivers tended to be a little lacking compared to Epson's pretty much universal support. And your average consumer doesn't give a rats ass about the postscript support on the laser printers he never buys.
It's still cludgey and counterintuitive to have to remember to leave a window you're done with open while you start a new one. I have trouble getting into the habit. I do the same thing with Firefox 3 all the time now, closing out an old session and having to wait a few minutes for it to finish shutting down before I open it back up.
It still costs more than a Palm T|X which is smaller and can be loaded with the software to read just about everything. Convenience factor is difficult to work with so it's easier to just write it off if you're trying to run numbers on something.
Slashdot Mirror
I give up. Just mod me down.
Forget I said anything. Once you RTFA you realize the summary is totally bogus. This is all just a bunch of Arduino micro dev boards.
Not to mention 60 some-odd products is absolutely pathetic for an industry.
I don't know that we're far enough past the real estate boom to say that rich old people are the rule rather than the exception. Many of these people made much of their money selling their old houses to baby boomers. That's not necessarily going to be the case going forward.
I've tried Esperanto, but the compatibility's abysmal.
I think he's arguing that we're looking at one gigantic false positive.
Who says they aren't just bullshitting the entire thing.
We're nerds. Being insufferable smart-asses is par for the course.
Actually as far as fast food products go KFC does tend to look remarkably similar to it's pictures.
We're talking the aviation market. There's a snowballs chance in hell of anyone charging a reasonable price for these.
Forget that. Blazer has prior art from years before the patent was even filed! There's no way this patent should stand up.
Why, why did you have to mention that! Now I'll be stuck hunting down crysallids for the next week!
For low incomes I thought the best was actually sticking water in discarded plastic bottles and slinging them onto the roof to cook out the nasties with free and plentiful sunlight.
No, there are not. There are ways to use fancy linear algebra like genuine fractals or lanczos to get more pixels out of your image without making it look absolutely horrible. What they will not do is increase the resolved detail of the image. The data simply isn't there to find.
Fear of open spaces.
Funny, I've never seen that "increase resolution" button in photoshop before. Either the copy they got for comparison is degraded or we're looking at a different picture, possibly composed from multiple images, with the same pose. Either way the AP did a crappy job of making their point here.
That helmet-cam footage is positively agoraphobia inducing.
I'm not sure. The light display on the Eiffel tower got copyrighted, so it might be possible to copyright a car.
And a LOT of half functional GUI config tools.
I always heard HP's linux inkjet drivers tended to be a little lacking compared to Epson's pretty much universal support. And your average consumer doesn't give a rats ass about the postscript support on the laser printers he never buys.
Which is the problem with Vista: It works just enough different than XP in many parts to piss people off.
Sounds a lot like tracing typewriters to me.
What the right wing does has no bearing on my point. I don't particularly like either of the big two right now.
It's still cludgey and counterintuitive to have to remember to leave a window you're done with open while you start a new one. I have trouble getting into the habit. I do the same thing with Firefox 3 all the time now, closing out an old session and having to wait a few minutes for it to finish shutting down before I open it back up.
It still costs more than a Palm T|X which is smaller and can be loaded with the software to read just about everything. Convenience factor is difficult to work with so it's easier to just write it off if you're trying to run numbers on something.