We need to hold the board of directors of the corporation legally responsible for corporate crime. Fining the company for killing people is a cost of business, putting the CEO in jail is a deterent.
The economics depends on what is cheaper, the fuel or the space plane. Currently the fuel is cheaper, so the Space Shuttle cost more than the Saturn 5.
Having armed FBI agents backed up by a platoon of special forces visit the main office and interrogate the senior management would discourage repetition.
Given the similar terms of the bills, it's likely they were written by the same person or corporate group. We are probably seeing the results of a concerted effort to enact spying provisions in every state. If you don't immediately oppose this publicly, you will see politicians in other states assume the public doesn't care, so they may as well take the lobbyist money. Having large tech companies publicly declare they intend to move their operations and jobs elsewhere might also help.
First they came for the criminals, and i said nothing because i'm not a criminal. Then they came for [long list goes here], and then they came for me, and there was nobody left to speak up for me. Attempts to destroy our freedoms always start with the worst of society and slowly move up to everyone else. This is why it's important to protect everyone (hence the phrase "human rights", instead of "good person rights").
Governments love having private companies do questionable things on their behalf, as this means they are not held responsible. Few people publicly complain about the cellphone companies willingly spying on us as agents of the government.
Information flows both ways in the open web. We get to try to "recruit" ISIS terrorists to leave the dark side and return to the light side. The biggest lesson we learned from decades of Cuba trade embargoes and political pressure is that evil thrives in the dark. Opening the door and letting the light shine in is an effective method of promoting civilized behavior. Ending the political isolation we imposed upon China has succeeded in turning them into people just like us.
There is very little factual scientific data on marijuana. A deliberate smear campaign by the US government kicked off the war on drugs, and it's been a hard sell to get actual scientists to study the stuff ever since.
Computer programming is a labour intensive job that can be done from anywhere. It's a perfect example of a job that is easy to offshore to the third world. I get that the president has to show he's helping keep America on top, but this won't actually do that.
The biggest problem with the NSA is transparency? How about they are not doing their job? They intercept and record all emails and sms messages, but they couldn't catch the Paris attackers. Even though several of them were on watch lists, and they openly planned their attack over (plain text) text messages.
If the UN had a standing army, you could make them do the job. All those third world expendable half trained troops would keep the country under our iron fisted rule forever. It would require coordination with Russia and China, however.
Islam doesn't specify how to dress, there is a huge range of "acceptable" clothing. Their goal might be a global state, but they have shown repeatedly they can't get along. Ex. Iran and Saudi Arabia are both hard core Islamic countries. Christianity did not become the dominant religion of South America by word of mouth.
It is reasonable to assume the NSA monitors all email traffic, so they would know who got copies already. The US Constitution requirements for a search warrant appear to exclude searching "everyone's mailbox" as a viable warrant, so your proposed search can't be legal. Would the police have to prove the file was important to their investigation or would you take their word for it? The US government has worked hard to destroy their credibility, but I don't know about the government of France.
This is why corporations need net neutrality. Info services should not be required to monitor their traffic, just respond to complaints. Anything else puts a massive strain and cost on business.
Old school investigative journalism was paid for by the TV station, not a product that was sold to cover costs. Much like old banks were expected to have fancy stone buildings, with pillars and stuff. In a world where the market avoids the toll booth economy it's hard to have one product subsidize another, so people expect the news to pay its own way. Quality journalism is expensive and requires a large enterprise to protect the investigative journalists. In the internet age, I don't see a roadmap to achieve old school investigative journalism.
They deliberately put oxygen in current incandescent bulbs to make them burn out. Also most of the wear and tear on the bulb is from turning on and off. And you can increase the life by using high voltage DC to eliminate the 60 hz thermal shocks.
The purpose of the right to bear arms is so rich men can shoot the poor thieves who try to rob them. The police state is to protect the rich men from the poor who try to rob them. The surveillance state is to find and catch the poor men who try to lead the poor to fight the rich men. I don't think rich men are having any difficulty justifying anything.
bypassing manually set registry settings sounds like bypassing a computer security system. Downloading a massive file sounds like measurable financial harm inflicted. If this was a north korean company you'd be looking at criminal charges.
The key requirement for a global communications system is interoperability. You need to be able to talk with anyone you want/need, without great difficulty. The traditional solution is a central command/control hub that is susceptible to spying. People are still working on a decentralized system that isn't.
Calling a country impotent because they can't get it up (missile into sub-orbital ballistic trajectory) is a foolish game. There are cargo ships from China every day of the year that could get it here. What keeps North Korea safe is China, standing behind them with a big club.
Slashdot Mirror
We need to hold the board of directors of the corporation legally responsible for corporate crime. Fining the company for killing people is a cost of business, putting the CEO in jail is a deterent.
I think the large "American" multi-national corporations should be considered "Foreign Corporations", as they clearly don't care about the USA.
The economics depends on what is cheaper, the fuel or the space plane. Currently the fuel is cheaper, so the Space Shuttle cost more than the Saturn 5.
Spotting spelling errors and punctuation mistakes is a very useful trait for professional programmers, as it speeds up debugging.
Or you could ban them from government contracts for 5 years. Money talks with this crowd.
Having armed FBI agents backed up by a platoon of special forces visit the main office and interrogate the senior management would discourage repetition.
Given the similar terms of the bills, it's likely they were written by the same person or corporate group. We are probably seeing the results of a concerted effort to enact spying provisions in every state. If you don't immediately oppose this publicly, you will see politicians in other states assume the public doesn't care, so they may as well take the lobbyist money. Having large tech companies publicly declare they intend to move their operations and jobs elsewhere might also help.
First they came for the criminals, and i said nothing because i'm not a criminal. Then they came for [long list goes here], and then they came for me, and there was nobody left to speak up for me. Attempts to destroy our freedoms always start with the worst of society and slowly move up to everyone else. This is why it's important to protect everyone (hence the phrase "human rights", instead of "good person rights").
History is filled with examples of competition not working. Try starting a company to compete with Microsoft, for example.
Governments love having private companies do questionable things on their behalf, as this means they are not held responsible. Few people publicly complain about the cellphone companies willingly spying on us as agents of the government.
Information flows both ways in the open web. We get to try to "recruit" ISIS terrorists to leave the dark side and return to the light side. The biggest lesson we learned from decades of Cuba trade embargoes and political pressure is that evil thrives in the dark. Opening the door and letting the light shine in is an effective method of promoting civilized behavior. Ending the political isolation we imposed upon China has succeeded in turning them into people just like us.
There is very little factual scientific data on marijuana. A deliberate smear campaign by the US government kicked off the war on drugs, and it's been a hard sell to get actual scientists to study the stuff ever since.
Computer programming is a labour intensive job that can be done from anywhere. It's a perfect example of a job that is easy to offshore to the third world. I get that the president has to show he's helping keep America on top, but this won't actually do that.
The biggest problem with the NSA is transparency? How about they are not doing their job? They intercept and record all emails and sms messages, but they couldn't catch the Paris attackers. Even though several of them were on watch lists, and they openly planned their attack over (plain text) text messages.
If the UN had a standing army, you could make them do the job. All those third world expendable half trained troops would keep the country under our iron fisted rule forever. It would require coordination with Russia and China, however.
Islam doesn't specify how to dress, there is a huge range of "acceptable" clothing. Their goal might be a global state, but they have shown repeatedly they can't get along. Ex. Iran and Saudi Arabia are both hard core Islamic countries. Christianity did not become the dominant religion of South America by word of mouth.
It is reasonable to assume the NSA monitors all email traffic, so they would know who got copies already. The US Constitution requirements for a search warrant appear to exclude searching "everyone's mailbox" as a viable warrant, so your proposed search can't be legal. Would the police have to prove the file was important to their investigation or would you take their word for it? The US government has worked hard to destroy their credibility, but I don't know about the government of France.
This is why corporations need net neutrality. Info services should not be required to monitor their traffic, just respond to complaints. Anything else puts a massive strain and cost on business.
Old school investigative journalism was paid for by the TV station, not a product that was sold to cover costs. Much like old banks were expected to have fancy stone buildings, with pillars and stuff. In a world where the market avoids the toll booth economy it's hard to have one product subsidize another, so people expect the news to pay its own way. Quality journalism is expensive and requires a large enterprise to protect the investigative journalists. In the internet age, I don't see a roadmap to achieve old school investigative journalism.
They deliberately put oxygen in current incandescent bulbs to make them burn out. Also most of the wear and tear on the bulb is from turning on and off. And you can increase the life by using high voltage DC to eliminate the 60 hz thermal shocks.
The purpose of the right to bear arms is so rich men can shoot the poor thieves who try to rob them. The police state is to protect the rich men from the poor who try to rob them. The surveillance state is to find and catch the poor men who try to lead the poor to fight the rich men. I don't think rich men are having any difficulty justifying anything.
bypassing manually set registry settings sounds like bypassing a computer security system. Downloading a massive file sounds like measurable financial harm inflicted. If this was a north korean company you'd be looking at criminal charges.
The key requirement for a global communications system is interoperability. You need to be able to talk with anyone you want/need, without great difficulty. The traditional solution is a central command/control hub that is susceptible to spying. People are still working on a decentralized system that isn't.
Is he claiming he found a way to safely have backdoored communications?
Calling a country impotent because they can't get it up (missile into sub-orbital ballistic trajectory) is a foolish game. There are cargo ships from China every day of the year that could get it here. What keeps North Korea safe is China, standing behind them with a big club.