Slashdot Mirror


'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day (infoworld.com)

LichtSpektren writes: As you may recall, Microsoft has delivered KB3035583 as a 'recommended update' to users of Windows 7 and 8.1. What this update does is install GWX ("Get Windows 10"), a program which diagnoses the system to see if it is eligible for a free upgrade to Windows 10, and if so, asks the user if they would like to upgrade (though recently, the option to decline has been removed). Some users have gotten around this by editing Windows Registry values for "AllowOSUpgrade", "DisableOSUpgrade", "DisableGWX", and "ReservationsAllowed" in order to disable the prompt altogether. This advice was endorsed by Microsoft on their support forums.

According to a report by Woody Leonhard at InfoWorld, the newest version of the KB3035583 update includes a background process which scans the system's Windows Registry twice a day to see if the values for the four aforementioned registry inputs were manually edited to disable the upgrade prompt. If they were, the process will alter the values, silently re-download the Windows 10 installation files (about 6 GB in total), and prompt the user to upgrade.

720 comments

  1. ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is so damn annoying. I tried Windows 10 and reverted within a day or so. On two different machines.

    1. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I disable cortona, reskin the menu and do some minor tweaks (Windows Snap "Oh you can put these next to it" is annoying - disable Disable DISABLE!)...

      After that, Windows 10 is... Windows. You get used to the minor differences.

    2. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 0, Troll

      I use Windows 10 on a professional and personal level. I don't see a problem with adapting at all. If anything moving to 10 was something I hesitated to do and once I did all computers HAD to be moved over. I have yet to complain about anything but Edge.

    3. Re:ARGH by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Informative

      So you're OK with the fact that Microsoft will bypass your settings and download 6 GB without prompting you?

    4. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Is that why Ballmer wanted to turn MS into an advertising power (where most infections come from in openbid ad networks) serving up malware themselves in ads?

    5. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're OK with the fact that Microsoft will bypass your [computer access controls] and download 6 GB [with full knowledge that they are exceeding authorized access]?

      FTF CFAA.

    6. Re:ARGH by bondsbw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who likes Windows 10 and thinks more people should upgrade and give it a chance... no, I'm not cool with overwriting the options you knowingly set.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    7. Re:ARGH by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My office paid good money for several copies of Windows 7, because that's the only OS that our software is certified to run on. Microsoft has guaranteed four more years of security updates for Win7. So why exactly should we drop several hundred grand to update? Because you think we're geezers? Well, if you'd like to pay for the update yourself, by all means.

    8. Re:ARGH by mjm1231 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I had a family member who had a (smallish SSD) C: drive, with most data and applications on their D: drive. The C: drive had just enough free space to download the Windows 10 update, and then fail and crash attempting to install it. The update process is smart enough to check for and unset registry keys, but apparently not smart enough to check if there is actually enough disk space.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    9. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would say that let the upgrade happen, and while it's happening, adjust the onion on your belt and go outside and yell at some clouds.

      And I would say you're a moron.

    10. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't force updates.

    11. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

      First off, the download was 3GB last I checked. Second, I really don't think the bandwidth consumption is the biggest issue here. Invasion of the user interface is far more aggravating to most users. If it was only for the bandwidth I'd say no big deal. Anybody running on less than 5% disk space has bigger issues than this.

      And don't take me wrong. I'm not saying it's not wrong but the average /. user most probably runs torrents, Netflix or some other form of high bandwidth software. Those 3GB of download are a drop in the bucket.

      Being a big user of MS products this news is very disappointing to me.

    12. Re:ARGH by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software. They can't rely on people who won't run patches, so they are going the Apple route. They know what you need, just submit and deal with it.

      I like Windows 10, using it on my surface 4 right now. Edge isn't awful, but I still use FF and Chrome.

      I would say that let the upgrade happen, and while it's happening, adjust the onion on your belt and go outside and yell at some clouds.

      So I'm just curious, what would Microsoft have to do for you to say "That crossed the line, that's too much"? Because routing around your manual settings to avoid being forced an update and then attempting to force a 6 GB update on you apparently isn't it.

    13. Re:ARGH by arth1 · · Score: 2

      (Also note that the "STD" and "DST" strings are not unique - they cannot uniquely identify time zones. CST, for example can be either Central Standard Time (USA), Central Standard Time (Australia) or China Standard Time.)

      Reverting is broken (unless it's been fixed very recently). Any events in the task scheduler gets converted to Windows 10 format when going to Windows 10, but if you revert, they do not get converted back again. So depending on your system's complexity, you're left with dozens or more tasks that won't run, and even worse, if opening the task scheduler and browsing to Windows, you get focus stealing popups complaining that the entries cannot be read, and have to dismiss them one by one, after which another pops up, and another, and another.
      Observed on two very different machines.

    14. Re:ARGH by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 0

      Unless your IT department didn't bother doing their job you're not being cajoled into anything right now. Computers registered on a domain are not subject to the same update policies as standalone, personal PCs. As for the ${x}00K cost to upgrade your legacy software, you're going to have to eat it some time within the next four years...

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    15. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple does not force updates like this, in fact it possible to turn them completely off.

    16. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean, Microsoft is tired of supporting THEIR OWN old ass insecure software. True. And it is their fault, for writing woefully insecure software in the first place.

    17. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... just submit and deal with it.

      2016 Year of the rapist UX design.
      No more "No" or "Cancel" buttons to clutter up designs.

    18. Re:ARGH by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Oops - sorry for the misquote.

      The quote should of course have been about reverting from Windows 10, not timezone stuff. Too many windows on too many blogs open!

    19. Re:ARGH by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I installed Win 10 on my Surface 3. After the 'upgrade', every time i pressed the power button, it locked the screen requiring a password to unlock, NO MATTER WHAT I SET POWER SETTINGS TO.. Kind of kills its usefulness as a tablet with that function broken. Windows 10 made my device LESS useful, but please dont let me interfere with your trolling......

      --
      Good-bye
    20. Re:ARGH by magarity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software. They can't rely on people who won't run patches

      I can completely sympathize with this frustration. My problem is not the annoyware pestering people to update their old ass insecure version but in the pushing of the entire update. Plenty of people have to use their phone in hot-spot mode or whatever kind of metered link to get some work done and the background download is killing it. Next time you're on a flight paying $$$ for the wifi that's already dead dog slow over satellite, tell me you don't mind someone a few rows over getting a giant update pushed at them.

    21. Re:ARGH by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I created what I call an "unfuck script" that does this and a number of other things (such as moving the documents folder into a cloud sync floating profile folder, where I have a bunch of portable apps sitting so that I don't need to run a bunch of installers) that way installing a fresh copy of Windows on any of my machines and fully configuring it afterwards takes me about 5 minutes, and because it's all scripted I don't forget important things (such as using my upstream bandwidth for other people to get windows updates.)

      http://pastebin.com/MmKimr3H

    22. Re:ARGH by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless your IT department didn't bother doing their job you're not being cajoled into anything right now. Computers registered on a domain are not subject to the same update policies as standalone, personal PCs. As for the ${x}00K cost to upgrade your legacy software, you're going to have to eat it some time within the next four years...

      So, should we surrender the four years that we paid for to be hip and with the times? Or should we save our money and then spend the next four years migrating to an OS that doesn't forcefully seize control of our computers?

    23. Re:ARGH by johanw · · Score: 1

      We use it at work. I now know for sure I don't want it at home, it looks even uglyer as Google's material design.

    24. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bit the bullet and bought a Mac. It isn't completely better, but it doesn't nag me about anything unimportant. Windows is relegated to a virtual machine, where it belongs.

    25. Re:ARGH by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      I don't see a problem with adapting at all.

      That's an unfair blanket statement to say about anyone who does not want Windows 10 right at this very moment like Microsoft is pushing. There are many non-luddite reasons one might want to hold off upgrading an operating system. Also what about people who try Windows 10, but it doesn't work for them? I tried the Windows 10 upgrade, which gave me much slower loading times, display issues that did not go away after updating video drivers, and moments the whole system would lock up for a few minutes because I dared touch the bottom left master "window" menu button. Windows 10 was unusable for me, so I switched back to Windows 7. My PC is showing it's age these days, but it runs Windows 7 and my other programs very well. I do play games on my PC, so I expect in the next 1-2 years a game will come out that will prompt me to upgrade my computer and I'll go Win10 then, but in meantime I'd appreciate if Microsoft stopped bugging me to upgrade. I'm usually a Microsoft supporter, but this latest Windows 10 roll out is particularly annoying.

    26. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save your money and time by not purchasing software which is so delicate it breaks when a version number increments.

    27. Re:ARGH by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software.

      I read that and expected the "appers apping apps" guy.

      Frankly, I wish it had been - he's funnier and more intelligent.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or you know maybe i need to use my Cisco vpn. Win 10 just up and uninstalls it with no notice.

    29. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People are tired if supporting old ass software companies. They can't rely on companies that will ignore they needs so they are going the Linux route. They know what they need, just submit and let them choose.

      I like Linux Mint 17, using it all my laptops. Firefox isn't the best, but I can still use Chromium (not that malvertising crap Chrome).

      I would say let the Linux Revolution happen, and while it's happening, adjust the collar around your neck and let some oxygen get to your brain.

    30. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software. They can't rely on people who won't run patches, so they are going the Apple route. They know what you need, just submit and deal with it.

      I like Windows 10, using it on my surface 4 right now. Edge isn't awful, but I still use FF and Chrome.

      I would say that let the upgrade happen, and while it's happening, adjust the onion on your belt and go outside and yell at some clouds.

      No, Microsoft is tired of people using perfectly serviceable old software that is no longer a revenue source for them. Forget that it's a "free" upgrade...they make money on each and every installation by selling off YOUR data to third parties. It's NOT out of the goodness of their hearts that they want everyone to upgrade here.

    31. Re:ARGH by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Very useful. Thanks.

    32. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Everyone knows that modern App Appers App Apps. Only LUDDITES use operating systems that have been out for over a year!

    33. Re:ARGH by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Informative

      So you're OK with the fact that Microsoft will bypass your settings and download 6 GB without prompting you?

      This - especially this! For the majority of rural Internet users, 6GB represents roughly 50-60% of their monthly bandwidth allotment - and it ain't cheap ( a typical 12GB monthly plan runs around $50-60 or so.)

      I wonder if anyone has tried to sue Microsoft yet over being shorted on bandwidth? On my part (yeah, I live in the sticks), I have only Linux and OSX at home, and given Microsoft's recent intrusions, I've become rather happy with my OS choices...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    34. Re:ARGH by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software. They can't rely on people who won't run patches, so they are going the Apple route.

      1) it's not Microsoft's decision to make on behalf of the public

      2) OSX allows you to turn that behavior off and choose for yourself when to check for updates. I have a small AppleScript that checks for updates and downloads them on my behalf at 3am, when satellite Internet won't count it against bandwidth.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    35. Re:ARGH by xeoron · · Score: 1

      I loved how MS claimed one of my systems was fully supported, only to discover the video card driver was discontinued and super buggy with display glitches over areas that have font in the system related things or in MS Edge (so far other apps are fine). Intel refuses to release a fix. Makes the system unusable for using the start menu, system search or any metro App (including system settings). Lucky it is a parents old system and I merely use it to access old files.... sometime soon I will just upgrade it to Linux to make it more usable.

    36. Re:ARGH by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

      They know what you need, just submit and deal with it.

      You must be a fun date.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    37. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ive gotten used to it now, i already had to tweak Windows 7 quite a bit before i found it usable. It just takes double the tweaking for Windows 10 (most of it revolves around data collection and reporting to ms).
      Now granted, they have dumbed down a lot of the settings and hidden/disabled a lot of them. But dig deep enough and most of them can still be altered.

      Only thing i wish i could disable was that fucking Defender shit!

    38. Re:ARGH by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, should we surrender the four years that we paid for to be hip and with the times?

      What's fair and what's reality are two entirely separate things. The short answer is -yes- get with the times; IT is a moving target of progress. There are cheaper options however; you can virtualize old Windows 95 boxes if you require legacy 16bit code to run over a mapped RS232 port as an example. It's ugly, but VM-ing an obsolete OS that's bound to custom legacy applications is doable.

      Are you fucking kidding me? We should spend hundreds of thousands of dollars migrating to an OS that provides literally nothing useful to us, seizes control from our hands, and spies on us--for no reason whatsoever other than because it would be "with the times"?

    39. Re:ARGH by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Save your money and time by not purchasing software which is so delicate it breaks when a version number increments.

      Had I been with my current company a decade ago, I assure you, I would've strenuously advised this.

    40. Re:ARGH by bluelip · · Score: 0

      Windows? I didn't realize that was still around except for a few cases on 95 and 98SE floating around.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    41. Re:ARGH by danbert8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't help when Windows 10 has some significant removal of features. I run Windows Media Center on my Windows 7 HTPC. I'm not going to update to Windows 10 just to hack WMC back into it...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    42. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows doesn't force an update either...

      But I disagree with you. Yes they do.

      If you ever accidentally update, there's no possible way to go back. If one of your apps break from updating, there's literally nothing you can do on your i thing but wait for the developer to fix their app - assuming they're still around.

    43. Re:ARGH by Shaman · · Score: 1

      Clearly, whoever that is you're chatting with has never run a business or worked a serious job in IT.

      --
      ...Steve
    44. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm just curious, what would Microsoft have to do for you to say "That crossed the line, that's too much"? Because routing around your manual settings to avoid being forced an update and then attempting to force a 6 GB update on you apparently isn't it.

      Apple users tolerate it. Why wouldn't Microsoft users tolerate it?

    45. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better than 8 (but that's not saying much for it)...

    46. Re: ARGH by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      That's what it's really about the user is the ware. For that reason I have trust issues now when it comes to M$ and I have disabled the automatic updates. It may be a risk, but I see that as a lower risk than allowing Microsoft to fuck up my computer.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    47. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I cannot argue that but I was just stating that to me it wasn't a hard transition. Some of the issues you started I encountered but they have since been fixed for my system.

    48. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure this is a matter of perspective. I remember a few occasions when Java was not exactly out of date but had known vulnerabilities and Apple responded by force disabling java on all apple computers. In this case it wasn't a forced update, but a forced disable function. IMO these browser plugins should be authorized use only with a heavy emphasis on users only running them when they trust the requested site. Force disabling something is problematic when internal software requires it especially if there is no newer version.

    49. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      significant removal of features

      WMC to me was a waste of time considering all the great Linux based solutions out there.

      Many of the other features MS removed I though were just common sense like Floppy Drive Support.

    50. Re:ARGH by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software.

      No, Microsoft is tired of not being able to spy on its users the way Google can.

      Also, the fact that Microsoft's software is insecure is it's own damn fault.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    51. Re:ARGH by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      No floppy drive support - that's definitely going to be a killer for any upgrade since I have some devices still using floppies as the only common way of exchanging data.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    52. Re:ARGH by Tarlus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's just it, though. Windows 7 isn't obsolete.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    53. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawd, I hate idiot fanboys.

    54. Re:ARGH by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

      You're not going to be running the latest version of Quickbooks on Windows XP. And you won't be running the latest AutoCAD on Windows 7 in ten years from now. GET OVER IT!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    55. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the payroll going?

    56. Re:ARGH by jriding · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because they overwrote the options you knowingly set, wouldn't this be in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Could someone not take them to court as well as file a federal charge against them?
      This is being done with out proper permission.

      Thoughts?

      --
      love the taste, hate the texture
    57. Re:ARGH by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > I don't see a problem with adapting at all.
      Getting keylogged is not adaptation.

    58. Re:ARGH by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I'll take a look at that, thank you for doing the work and sharing it.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    59. Re:ARGH by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple users DON'T tolerate it. You can trivially and easily turn off automatic updates on Apple, and they don't push patches with godawful numbers to dick around in the godawful registry to unset the godawful hex values you painstakingly set.

      On Apple you tell it not to update and it doesn't.

      Also even if Apple DID suck in this way, it's not a reason for Microsoft to suck in this way.

    60. Re:ARGH by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      First of all, read the article. Yes, Windows forces updates. Especially Windows 10.

      Second of all, no, Apple does not force updates. Accidentally updating a Mac is not the same as being forced by Apple to do so. And if you are responsible and maintain backups of your system (i.e. Time Machine), it is very easy to roll back.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    61. Re:ARGH by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Apple has never forced an OS update into people's computers.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    62. Re:ARGH by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      You mean, Microsoft is tired of supporting THEIR OWN old ass insecure software. True. And it is their fault, for writing woefully insecure software in the first place.

      They want to replace their old ass insecure software with new ass insecure software.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    63. Re:ARGH by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      So why exactly should we drop several hundred grand to update?

      Several hundred grand for what? If Software Assurance was bought with those Windows 7 licenses, or they were bought through enterprise agreements, it should cost you nothing to update. Where are you getting this several hundred grand from?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    64. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft support load and costs for end users is probably close to zero. Your support comes from your OEM unless you bought the full version of Windows. If you call MS, you have to pay. I doubt that is a money losing operation for them.

      Microsoft may want to get rid of Window 7 but they still have to meet their published EOL dates and there will be many companies pushing to keep that going.

    65. Re:ARGH by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "I use Windows 10 on a professional and personal level. I don't see a problem with adapting at all."

      All conspiracy theorizing aside, I see it as an attempt to finally get at least most Windows users on one version again, which has not been the case since XP.

    66. Re:ARGH by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      Apple certainly disabled Java and will currently disable flash. They only do so when it is being exploited *and* a patched version is available. Personally, I think they shouldn't bother waiting for a patched version, but, hey.

      Google has a deal with Adobe (part of their "FU" to Apple, amusingly enough) so that Chrome is always up-to-date with Flash. Doesn't stop it from being exploited before an update is available, though.

      But, sure, go ahead and conflate OS major version upgrades with security fixes. I mean, its all the same thing, right?

    67. Re:ARGH by Drethon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of our friends had a five year old Acer netbook with Win 7 starter (a bit of a WTF in itself). They thought they had to upgrade to Win 10 so they said OK to the nag window. End result, the computer no longer starts. I tried pulling the HD and looking at it with another computer and the computer doesn't even know what to do with the drive.

    68. Re:ARGH by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > They know what you need, just submit and deal with it.

      Myopic much?

      Translation: Bend over, lube up, and take it up ass, because we have no balls to be anything other then Microsoft's bitch.

      There is only one appropriate response: Fuck You, Microsoft. I don't need nor want your shitty spy-trojan-laced GUI. I already have working computers with Windows 7, and Windows XP, OSX 10.9, and Linux 12.04 TLS. There is nothing I need in Windows 10. In contradistinction, there are lots of things I don't WANT with Windows 10.

      --
      Microsoft Windows 8 and 10, noun: A 64-bit compilation of 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition with 0 bit of understanding good UI.

    69. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a hardware failure.

    70. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't about W10's use.

      It is the privacy aspect. Yes, we all agreed to the EULA, but why is it that I have to hand over all the info on my computer to Microsoft? Where does that info go? Is it in a secure database, or a document that might wind up on pastebin sometime down the road?

      As stated above, Windows has its uses... but it is definitely going to be behind a firewall and DNS server so the telemetry data is constantly wants to phone home stays put.

    71. Re:ARGH by penix1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Computers registered on a domain are not subject to the same update policies as standalone, personal PCs.

      That's horseshit! I work in State government and our machines are nagging the shit out of us and we are on Enterprise version on a domain. Of course, that simply means that the Governor's Office of Technology are incompetent boobs and let this update through but still, it proves your statement false.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    72. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same issue at a previous job with insanely expensive software that runs on XP. The fix? P2V, and leave the software running on XP... on a VM. That way, the world can pass it by, it be moved from hardware to hardware, and disk to disk, no issues.

    73. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Citizen, you have been enrolled for re-education Thank you, and please have a pleasant life.

    74. Re:ARGH by localman · · Score: 2

      The problem is that not everyone is on an unlimited broadband. I don't expect Microsoft to cater primarily to the millions upon millions of people who still have slow and/or metered connections, but it would be nice if they didn't go out of their way to make our life hell.

    75. Re:ARGH by Painted · · Score: 1

      My $5000 HP plotter has Windows 7 drivers only. MS upgrading me to 10 renders that hardware useless. MS either owes me working drivers (it IS a postscript printer, it should work) or a new printer.

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
    76. Re: ARGH by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      Microsoft isnt going to pay to have some other companies software work properly on a brand new OS. The company this guy works for would have to pay to upgrade the software they are running.

    77. Re:ARGH by HiThere · · Score: 2

      When I decided to check the options for "get with the times" back around 1998, I started reading EULAs. Amazingly I soon switched to Linux (with a stopover at Apple) despite Linux not having a decent word processor. It was still the correct decision. Since around 2000 I haven't regretted it once.

      It took a bit longer to convince my wife, since she wouldn't read the EULAs, and also needed music score editing software (which still stinks on Linux unless you're a programmer). There were also problems when she was trying to sync sounds with cel animation. It was easier on the Apple. Apple fixed that, though, by updating their system in a way that broke the usability of the software we had bought. (Don't misunderstand. She was talking about animations for use by or with grade school children with the animation being adapted for the particular child. So it wasn't anything fancy. Sometimes html sound and gif animation was good enough.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    78. Re:ARGH by HiThere · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think he's talking about the cost to replace packages bought from 3rd parties.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    79. Re: ARGH by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      No. Now its called a feature that it spy's on you and sends info to microsoft.

    80. Re:ARGH by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      In some cases you don't have a choice - you may have a software that was developed a long time ago that do exactly what you want and is horribly expensive to replace - and it's tied to a specific OS version. Not unusual at all in some industrial solutions.

      There are also software with copy protection schemes that will no longer work if you upgrade, some even gets messed up if you do a defragmentation of your hard disk.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    81. Re:ARGH by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Apple may not force updates, but they've follows MS' lead before, but they have in the past mislabeled breaking functional updates as security updates. I don't know if they've done it in the last decade, as I've stopped using Apple devices that connect to the net.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    82. Re:ARGH by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You can't yet prove that the new software is insecure. I'll admit that that's the way I'd bet, but be less certain. What you can prove is that the new software is extremely invasive and assumes lack of privacy (in certain new ways).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    83. Re:ARGH by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure thats not happening ;).

    84. Re:ARGH by Drethon · · Score: 2

      5 years old, I think the HD was ready to go. Still, I blame Windows 10!

    85. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never trusted any reverting features on something as major as a major number OS upgrade. The time-tested thing to do is to do a backup or even better, an offline image via Clonezilla, then perform an upgrade. For a VM, pop a snapshot, power off the VM and back it up to a OVA file, or both.

      This way, when you do a restore, you are not dealing with cruft going forward... nor the cruft left by the newer OS rolling back. Nothing gets put back exactly the way it was left, it seems.

    86. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard 5, 6, and 10GB, but regardless of the exact download size, it's enough to be a big deal. Some people have metered connections or low data caps (yes, I know that's not the majority of users. That doesn't make it okay to shit all over the .5-1% of users who have that type of situation).

    87. Re:ARGH by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      other than because it would be "with the times"?

      That depends on how important the times are. Do your times support current hardware when your old one breaks? Do the times support the old software you run? Are you exposed to any security risks as a result of not being with the times?

      There are many reasons IT needs to "stay with the times" and very few of them have to do with just being old or upgrading for upgrade's sake.

    88. Re:ARGH by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That EULA wasn't just for the software - it was for the hardware too. You think you own the hardware?

    89. Re:ARGH by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 defaults to a GPT partition table on the HDD. I think this is the default choice if you chose to wipe and start afresh though I'm not entirely sure. If that's the case pulling it and inserting it into a computer with an older OS or older BIOS it won't be recognised properly.

      I think. Not entirely sure about that but it's a line of inquiry worth exploring if you're going to try and get something like this working in the future.

    90. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NOT TRUE!

      We have several hundred domain win 7 clients all running under open license and they have all tried to update. I have had to remove the appropriate updates to stop this behavior!

      The answer I got was "Oops, sorry. It was not suppose to do that!"

    91. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one instance.

    92. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The level of monitoring and metrics that is included with Windows 10 is not acceptable.

    93. Re:ARGH by Snard · · Score: 1

      significant removal of features

      WMC to me was a waste of time considering all the great Linux based solutions out there.

      How many of those "great Linux based solutions" support CableCard? I have TWC, and I want to be able to view and record programs. None of the Linux based solutions I looked at will support a CableCard-enabled tuner such as HDHomeRun Prime.

      --
      - Mike
    94. Re:ARGH by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Can't you use Windows 7 drivers on Windows 10? If not, that sounds more like HP creating a bad driver.

    95. Re:ARGH by peragrin · · Score: 1

      At work we have the opposite problem. Windows 10 downloaded to all the desktops but the crashes when it tries to start. Every single time.

      So we have a hunch of Windows 7 machines that can't accept the upgrade. Not the end of the world as your software is all on the server Which Everyone remote desktops into. Easy to manage and even easier to replace desktop when needed.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    96. Re:ARGH by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      bypassing manually set registry settings sounds like bypassing a computer security system. Downloading a massive file sounds like measurable financial harm inflicted. If this was a north korean company you'd be looking at criminal charges.

    97. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since it supports PS, you could most likely hook that plotter up to a $50 Debian box, share the printer to your other systems, and all work be well. I've done this with multiple expensive plotters in engineering offices. -PCP

    98. Re:ARGH by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      For those of us who live in Outback, Nowhere, with crappy DSL (some people still on dialup!) that bandwidth consumption is a pretty big deal. Worse, people who pay for X amount of bandwidth on a monthly basis, and get charged for overages. (not me - my download speed sucks but there's no limit on it)

      Unauthorized appropriatoin of resources - sounds like theft to me!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    99. Re:ARGH by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Observation 1 - ten years is ten years away. 2 - many shops don't need or want the latest AutoCAD - or any other software for that matter. 3 - many shops have no use for Quickbooks

      Our machine shop has all of the software they want installed on each and every machine they operate, and they will NOT want anyone tampering with them, in any way. Period.

      Maintenance shop, ditto.

      Those production machines that use Microsoft OS's are still NT4 - and they aren't connected to the internet anyway - so we can ignore those.

      Office machines are a whole 'nother story. The so-called IT department doesn't do squat with them anyway, they are all outsourced, and operate up there in "The Cloud". I don't really care what they screw up on those things, I have no responsibility for them. I hope they all crash and burn.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    100. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know what you need, just submit and deal with it.

      You must be a fun date.

      Sounds more like a serial rapist to me, than someone who "dates".

    101. Re:ARGH by Tharkkun · · Score: 2

      Unless your IT department didn't bother doing their job you're not being cajoled into anything right now. Computers registered on a domain are not subject to the same update policies as standalone, personal PCs. As for the ${x}00K cost to upgrade your legacy software, you're going to have to eat it some time within the next four years...

      So, should we surrender the four years that we paid for to be hip and with the times? Or should we save our money and then spend the next four years migrating to an OS that doesn't forcefully seize control of our computers?

      No. Your IT department should've done their job and disabled the update. We have 120k users, close to 200k machines and it took one 1 update behind the scenes to stop this upgrade across our company.

    102. Re:ARGH by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Unless your IT department didn't bother doing their job you're not being cajoled into anything right now. Computers registered on a domain are not subject to the same update policies as standalone, personal PCs. As for the ${x}00K cost to upgrade your legacy software, you're going to have to eat it some time within the next four years...

      That's incorrect also.

    103. Re:ARGH by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple users DON'T tolerate it. You can trivially and easily turn off automatic updates on Apple, and they don't push patches with godawful numbers to dick around in the godawful registry to unset the godawful hex values you painstakingly set.

      On Apple you tell it not to update and it doesn't.

      Also even if Apple DID suck in this way, it's not a reason for Microsoft to suck in this way.

      Instead Apple's IOS updates brick your machine, disable your 4g wireless calls until reverted, replace your google maps with one that drives you into a canyon, and turns on shit like "receive calls only from favorites" when you have no favorites selected.

    104. Re:ARGH by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Does Apple really have more bugs than Microsoft? And google maps is still available, it's just not the pack-in.

      Fixing Apple drama is really easy. Fixing Microsoft drama is literally impossible.

    105. Re:ARGH by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      That's what you get for buying Microsoft products. Maybe next time you'll think twice about buying anything from them.

    106. Re:ARGH by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You should surrender it because you made a stupid choice in vendor and product selection. If you don't like the way your vendor is treating you, maybe you could sue them. But the easier thing to do is simply avoid this vendor in the future.

    107. Re:ARGH by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is. If consumers are so dumb they'll continue to buy from vendors no matter how much the vendors abuse them, then why shouldn't the vendors take advantage of them for greater profit? What are the consumers going to do, switch to Linux? Apparently not. So MS might as well do this stuff if it makes them more money. It seems that no amount of abuse will drive their customers away.

    108. Re:ARGH by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Hahaha. I use Mint myself, but I'm sorry, I don't see anyone converting to Linux over all these Microsoft shenanigans. They just sit around and bitch endlessly about it, but they refuse to dump the vendor that abuses them.

    109. Re:ARGH by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "There are also software with copy protection schemes that will no longer work if you upgrade, some even gets messed up if you do a defragmentation of your hard disk."

      Are you exaggerating? Can you give a citation? I've never witnessed anything like a program stop working after defragging.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    110. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you need hundreds of thousands of dollars to upgrade 'several copies of windows 7' you have bigger problems than anything MS is doing to you.

    111. Re: ARGH by slazzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an apple share holder I just wanted to say thank you microsoft, you're making my retirement dreams come early.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    112. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3GB, over a metered connection?

      I didn't ask for their update. I expressly forbid it to be installed (moved the KB) because doing so would eat up my monthly allowance, and here they went and un-forbid it and then downloaded the 3 to 6 GB over my metered connection? Where do I send the bill?

    113. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about Ubuntu?

    114. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't tried it. Mostly because I just don't see the point of "upgrade now because new shiny". If I have an OS I don't hate (and to be honest for me pretty much any version of windows since xp (except the original version 8) satisfies that requirement), that seems stable and has been set up how I like it, then why on earth would I want to go through the pain of upgrading, with all its inevitable problems with software incompatibility, buggy and unpredictable install process, messing around fixing "improvements" and general time-wasting involved? If it aint broke...

      Actually I suspect Microsoft's motivation is precisely the increased prevalence of this attitude. They don't want the OS to fade into the background: they want it up front and center, walking the fine line between impressing with fancy new features and promising improved and "fixing minor irritant x" just over the horizon. And these days that basically boils down to jumping on the latest buzzword and shuffling the deck-chairs in a slightly annoying way (look, we have icons! And 3D animations! No, wait, flat tiles! And ribbons! Actually scratch that, let's try menus again! And look, we've reintroduced that feature we dropped a while back, only now it's $x extra for the super-extra-premium-gold version!)

    115. Re:ARGH by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      SE was okay. Except for the TCP/IP stack.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    116. Re:ARGH by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      The fuck?

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    117. Re:ARGH by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Disable what? 38 KBs and their brothers, and any newer one's the mothership demands you install? GWX is one update (that they've re-released a few times), but there are MANY others bringing parts of WinX into your system.

      (I suppose if that "behind the scenes" thing was "block all of Microsoft", then that would, indeed, work.)

    118. Re:ARGH by Cramer · · Score: 1

      That might work for the far simpler XP -- for which "activation" can be legitimately permanently disabled. Windows 7 (and beyond) have no such mode, and are far more aware of hardware changes. If the virtual hardware doesn't almost precisely match the physical hardware, re-activation will be required. OEM VLK's are a serious pain to use in a VM -- and you have to make damn sure the physical "fingerprint" follows that VM everywhere. Even a retail key will need re-activation if the hardware changes too much or too often.

      (I run into this all the time. XP: trivial to fix, Win7: fixable with a few tricks, Win10: those tricks don't work anymore)

    119. Re:ARGH by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge this update shouldn't be touching machines on a domain? It's not even about the IT group being bad, it simply isn't (supposed) to target domain attached machines.

      I just checked a couple of the machines on a small domain I manage, no sign of the files on the workstations.

    120. Re:ARGH by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Yes, YES MICROSOFT IS forcing people to "upgrade". They are hiding the "get windows 10" bullshit as a "recommended update" (and briefly tagged it "required"), and it's downloading (and by some reports INSTALLING) Windows 10 without even asking. And it's no longer giving users the option to say no.

      Yes, Apple will nag that there's an update, but they don't download it without your permission, and they don't pre-install it so you can reboot into the new version instantly.

    121. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux 12.04 TLS.

      Good ol' Linux 12.04

    122. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Games have kept me on windows. I just finished installing steamos on my gaming machine. Going to test it for a while see how it goes. If it looks good it will stay and ill be ditching windows at home entirely. I dont have the time or patients to fight the updates anymore. They want me off 7? Ok working on it.

    123. Re: ARGH by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Well hopefully there's a huge number of people out there just like you, and all the whiners saying they *must* have application X and will never leave Windows because of it are in the minority. But I'm not hopeful on that.

    124. Re:ARGH by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software.

      You mean the bug-ridden insecure software that they wrote, and then sold to you? And now you want to but the newest bug-ridden insecure software form the same company while everyone, including Microsoft laughs their asses off on how gullible people can be.

      My sides are splitting. As long as there are astoundingly stupid people like you in the world, there's no reason to improve software quality. It's much more profitable and fun just to sell you more bugs.

    125. Re:ARGH by magarity · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, the worst first world problem I have to deal with is self righteous condescending anon cowards who can't spell beyond a first grade level.

    126. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah it just nags you once a day to upgrade your mac, which would mean you have to buy new versions of any programs you have installed.

    127. Re:ARGH by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      You sound like a very unhappy, angry sort of person. Have you considered counseling? Might help you with your apparent perspective issues. Might even help you make a friend or two.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    128. Re:ARGH by lgw · · Score: 1

      I installed Win 10 on my Surface 3. After the 'upgrade', every time i pressed the power button, it locked the screen requiring a password to unlock, NO MATTER WHAT I SET POWER SETTINGS TO.. Kind of kills its usefulness as a tablet with that function broken. Windows 10 made my device LESS useful, but please dont let me interfere with your trolling......

      If anyone knows a fix for this, please post! I have no use for a tablet where I ever have to type in my password to use it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    129. Re:ARGH by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I use Windows 10 on a professional and personal level. I don't see a problem with adapting at all. If anything moving to 10 was something I hesitated to do and once I did all computers HAD to be moved over. I have yet to complain about anything but Edge.

      I agree w/ this, but I do think that Windows 10 should not be forced on people who are happy w/ either Windows 7 or 8.x.

      Enough of that, and you'll see more people either buying Macs, or switching to other things, like ChromeBook, Android, et al. Those who don't know about installing Linux or BSD

    130. Re:ARGH by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I like Defender - I've avoided buying separate anti-virus packages as a result.

      I used to think Classic Shell was just useful for Windows 8. It didn't do much for me there - did nothing about hot corners, but it's certainly a lot better for Windows 10. I've managed to make the laptop version of it as identical to Windows 7, Aero look and all. With the pulldown menu, and losing those icons.

    131. Re:ARGH by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I really wonder how it works on a computer that just has 16GB of SSD/Flash drive? Like a Winbook TW700. Windows 10 requires at least 14GB of storage, so there is no way that that thing will support it.

      They had utilities that could scan a computer and determine whether it was Vista ready. Can't they run this first before deciding to force the update nag button on the laptop?

    132. Re:ARGH by unixisc · · Score: 1

      My Winbook - I just got Microsoft to reset the installation, since the Location was locked at disabled - like I couldn't use Maps in conjunction w/ my location. They did that, and now the Windows button at the bottom of the screen no longer works. I tried googling, but couldn't find what would be a driver for that. Microcenter gave me a list of updates that WON'T work w/ this tablet.

    133. Re:ARGH by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      Virtualizing old versions of Windows is probably a breach of contract, as the OS is only allowed to be installed on the original computer. According to MS, only the original receipt is proof of license as well. Volume licensing could be different, but I imagine a valid volume license for Windows 95 doesn't exist today.

    134. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah thanks for the update MS - I spent 5 hours waiting for 'updating your machine' to finish only to spend the next 2 days diagnosing 'bad_pool_address' BSOD and reverting back to the just-fine, never ever crashes Win7. This experience of having crap rammed down my throat makes me want to look at a Mac next.

    135. Re:ARGH by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do your times support current hardware when your old one breaks?

      Seriously? You have to ask this?
      Using the magic of the internet, I can buy hardware going back 10+ years.
      Using the magic of my operating system, I can install hardware that is 10+ years old.
      The only real issues are DX10 and 11, and ram limits, if you can really consider those to be major issues.

      Do the times support the old software you run?

      Yes, because if I paid someone to make me custom niche software I likely need that software to keep doing what it's doing. Why pay someone to make it again when it isn't necessary?

      Are you exposed to any security risks as a result of not being with the times?

      You know, I probably am. However, Microsoft is now proving themselves to be another one of the security threats. So I can bend over and take it from Microsoft, or I can roll the dice. I think I'll take my chances.

    136. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you have to disable the autologon associated with your Microsoft account to get that password prompt to go away. Once that's done, there's probably a half-dozen other places where you have to tell it "No, do not ask for a fucking password on wake."

      This is what happens when everyone in Redmond with an IQ over 80 is either retired, or working for Google.

    137. Re: ARGH by Anubis350 · · Score: 0

      Given that payroll is probably done on those office machines you may want to care a little :p

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    138. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "protected"program would jot down a note to itself at the time of install about where physically did it get copied to and if it was found to be in a different area it wouldn't work. Any operation that altered it's location could therefore break the program.

    139. Re:ARGH by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think people are confusing OSX with iOS, desktop versus phone. But that's understandable, because Microsoft is also confused by the difference between a desktop and a smartphone.

    140. Re:ARGH by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I hate the registry. It causes places like Microsoft to overuse that concept to an extreme. On the other hand, I like the registry, because it makes it easy to overrule Microsoft's ridiculous decisions.

      If they wanted to force something on us AND if they had a clue, they wouldn't use the registry for this. But they're so married to the idea of using the registry to do everything that they've never considered the option of not using it.

    141. Re:ARGH by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, I've got 8.1. I don't mind it. But what's the point of going from there to Windows 10, other than the tried and true Microsoft marketing mantra of "you'll have to upgrade someday so you may as well get it done while it's still free"?

    142. Re:ARGH by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 0

      But why does EVERYTHING change?! It's not fair!

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    143. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more small businesses in the world than there are large corporations. Almost all of these small business don't have an IT department or even an "IT person." There isn't a domain to join for these computers. At best, some small businesses might have several computers connected in a workgroup.

    144. Re:ARGH by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      I use Windows 10 on a professional and personal level. I don't see a problem with adapting at all. If anything moving to 10 was something I hesitated to do and once I did all computers HAD to be moved over. I have yet to complain about anything but Edge.

      OMG ! You must be Donald Knuth. Nice to meet you sir.

    145. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software.

      Remind me again, who wrote that "old ass insecure software" ?

    146. Re:ARGH by cc1984_ · · Score: 1

      If you need hundreds of thousands of dollars to upgrade 'several copies of windows 7' you have bigger problems than anything MS is doing to you.

      It's probably the cost of upgrading the other software to be certified on Windows 10 rather than the OS itself.

    147. Re:ARGH by pereric · · Score: 1

      As for the ${x}00K cost to upgrade your legacy software, you're going to have to eat it some time within the next four years...

      Not certainly. In four years (which is quite a time), a legacy system might have been replaced with a web-based or portable system, so that your workstations could be simple chromeboxes or at least switching to free operative systems. Or the legacy system may be of less use and, run virtualized. Or the company switching to do something completely different.

    148. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or left his parents basement. Everyone should stop talking to him. Problem solved.

    149. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but you should have known that Microsoft does not care about you and that something like this could very well happen. You should also be prepared for a lot of things worse than this from the same vendor. Why do you think there are people who don't touch their products? Because they don't like the icons? No, it's because of things like this.

      It sounds to me like you didn't do your homework before you rolled out this system and now you are paying the price.

    150. Re:ARGH by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... Windows 10 is WAY more insecure than previous versions, because of all the "connected" crap.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    151. Re:ARGH by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      The desktop personalization on Windows 10 is also broken

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    152. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple let you select and decline updates and do not force you to upgrade so not even close to the same thing, To Microsoft YOU are now the product they are selling which is why they are forcing people to move over to their spyware type model

    153. Re:ARGH by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      It was not unusual in the early age of copy protection (Primarily under DOS) that the software stored key data for the copy protection in a hidden sector on the disk or past end of file in one of the data files for an application using an unused sector in an cluster but some defrag software only looked at used sectors and ignored the rest.

      And in some cases the copy protection was in sector or track metadata outside the physical sector. Sometimes found in copy-protected floppies.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    154. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm holding off on the update to Windows 10 until my next machine. I manually blocked the update and haven't seen any notifications about Windows 10 for the past 4 months. No company is flawless and Microsoft's actions lately may be a little misguided, but if you want to get fucked up the ass without lube, Apple is perfect. If you like a half-baked OS with a GUI the resembles an aborted fetus, GNU/Linux fits the bill. I'm glad to have a better choice.

    155. Re:ARGH by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Using the magic of the internet, I can buy hardware going back 10+ years.

      Oh god. You're not one of those people are you? The assumption that you can buy old hardware as a sensible solution to the problem of obsolescence is absurd at best and dangerous at worst. You not only have diminishing supply, but you face a rising cost, and increasingly less reliability.

      Yes, because if I paid someone to make me custom niche software I likely need that software to keep doing what it's doing. Why pay someone to make it again when it isn't necessary?

      Where did you get this idea from? One of the options discussed is virtualisation. As to why pay someone when it isn't necessary, well as I said necessary depends on your business case. I wish you good luck with buying 10+ year old hardware off the internet, but if it's important enough to keep running then it is usually important enough to keep up to date.

      However, Microsoft is now proving themselves to be another one of the security threats.

      Only if you're using a home OS. You do realise none of the Windows 10 problems we have discussed so far have applied to enterprise versions of windows or professional versions tied to a domain right? Something that is trivial to do.

    156. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd probably get caught up in the "Who owns the software?" nonsense. Remember, you don't actually *own* windows, you *lease* it. I doubt the license has changed just because it's free...

    157. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid Microsoft program doesn't even check if your CPU is supported. I clicked on Update to Windows 10, but then get the CPU not supported. It would be nice if the program checked to see if hardware is supported or not.

      At first, I used msconfig to disable this crapware, until I removed the update, and then hid it (option in Windows Update).

    158. Re:ARGH by craigtp · · Score: 1

      The first thing to install after installing Windows 10 is this very useful tool: Shut Up 10
      which will turn off most (if not all) of the spying within Windows 10. The utility gets fairly regular updates, too.

      Made by a well respected German company (who are a Microsoft Gold Partner no less - no figure).

    159. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh.. HP has given a perfect driver for Windows 7.

      Microsoft forced the update, against the user's will, and in the process made the hardware useless. It is NOT HP that has to do something in this case. It is solely Microsoft's unwanted (and my emphasis is on UNWANTED) action here that rendered the hardware useless, so Microsoft has to undertake action to compensate the user or at least make the hardware usable again.

      It would be different if the user did the upgrade him/herself, or has not taken action to prevent the update. But in this case Microsoft did act, while the user was actively and explicitly forbidding this action. It happened completely against the will of the user, and was forced upon this user. So, the user can't be blamed in any way, because he/she did everything possible to prevent the hardware become useless. There is only one party to blame.. And that is Microsoft.

    160. Re:ARGH by doccus · · Score: 1

      First off, the download was 3GB last I checked. Second, I really don't think the bandwidth consumption is the biggest issue here. Invasion of the user interface is far more aggravating to most users. If it was only for the bandwidth I'd say no big deal. Anybody running on less than 5% disk space has bigger issues than this.

      And don't take me wrong. I'm not saying it's not wrong but the average /. user most probably runs torrents, Netflix or some other form of high bandwidth software. Those 3GB of download are a drop in the bucket.

      Being a big user of MS products this news is very disappointing to me.

      I actually made the same argument as you.. and I was quickly corrected. It's a BANDWITH issue.. And I can see how that woiuld be a problem...

    161. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know what you need, just submit and deal with it.

      That is, honestly, the saddest thing I have ever seen on the internet.
      Ever.

      Not only do they not know what I need, but they have no idea what they need.
      You think monthly patches is normal, don't you? It's not. It's needed because they are so incompetent, so ignorant, so pathetic in their coding ability that they are the only solution.

    162. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what?

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software.

      Who wrote this "old ass insecure software"? And who proudly proclaims, with every new Windows release, "The most secure Windows EVAH!!!!"?

      Here's a hint: Microsoft. So if they're tired of supporting insecure software, maybe they should quit producing insecure software. They made their own bed here.

    163. Re:ARGH by vandamme · · Score: 1

      See if all your software will run on Linux under Wine. That would solve two big problems.

    164. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing to install after Windows 10 is Windows 7. FIFY.

    165. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where is this island #9?

    166. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to make a minor correction about your version of GNU/Linux.

      From the version number, I assume you're running Ubuntu GNU/Linux 12.04 LTS.
      Better to have proper branding as there are so many different distributions that it's mind boggling and not keeping track of which distro is what can be a nightmare

    167. Re:ARGH by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Was the hardware not recognized, or was it the partition that was not recognized? I see no way in which even Micro$oft could fuck up the hard drive without flashing the firmware of the drive, which is highly unlikely. Take it to a nerd, preferably one who uses Linux on a regular basis, and do not, under any circumstances, take it to "geek squad" or anything comparable.

    168. Re:ARGH by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Apple hasn't forced iOS updates either. Granted, they have their own tactics and the yearly update model has become a way of life in the Apple universe. But even with their artificially shortened OS lifespans, you never wake up in the morning to find your iToy suddenly rebooting to install an update you didn't want or approve.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    169. Re:ARGH by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software. They can't rely on people who won't run patches, so they are going the Apple route. They know what you need, just submit and deal with it.

      What do you mean "Going the Apple route?"

      Just like everyone else, Apple defaults their Updates to automatically download and install, but not only do they do a much better job of telling you what they are doing; but they also make it extremely easy to not have automatic updates.

      Quit assigning the name "Apple" to just any-old-thing you don't think is right.

    170. Re:ARGH by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Really? Because I had Windows 10 crash on a clean install less than a week after installing, with no software installed except for chrome and firefox, while sitting next to a Windows 7 computer that's been running 200+ days straight. Windows 10 is garbage. Necessary garbage, but still garbage.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    171. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I agree w/ this, but I do think that Windows 10 should not be forced on people who are happy w/ either Windows 7 or 8.x.

      I agree. I wasn't trying to say that the spamming was acceptable by any means. I just came upon a Windows 7 machine a work that is having this issue.

      Enough of that, and you'll see more people either buying Macs, or switching to other things, like ChromeBook, Android, et al.

      I'm only willing to believe this to a degree. MAC has no real entry level pricing and I can't tell you how often people come to me with a budget under $700 CAD which is nothing if you looking at Apple products. As for the rest well it depends what they want to do. Humans in nature pick the safe options and MS is a safe options because everyone and your uncle can support or at least assist. Corporate and enterprise is very different as their options are even further limited if they work with existing MS software or need compatibility with other companies that operate in MS. There's still a huge number productivity applications not available in Linux

    172. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      start menu isn't a "driver," it's a database, one which breaks constantly on Windows 10. I get laptops into my repair shop all the time because the start menu (and every other component that uses the same UI elements) stops working.

      Most reliable/fastest fix I've found is the repair-all-in-one from tweaking.com. Just install it, run the repair with the default options selected (takes about an hour generally) and it will most likely fix that problem for you.

    173. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of those "great linux based solutions" is Kodi, which also runs on Windows and should support your cable card that way. You'd probably like it quite a bit more than WMC.

    174. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I totally get that. MS only downloads if the machine is idle. My personal experience confirms this for me. Most people also have automatic updates setup so they are already obtaining a number of updates automatically (multiple gigs worth after every big office update). So where's the line? At what point can a company start assuming something?

      Why do we treat software different than home appliances? After all it's how users want their computers to work. Did the new appliance you just install ask you before consuming electricity to remain in standby mode? Did the application ask you before performing self maintenance?

      MS Should not spam any users and that's an obvious F*** Up. I hope they put their thinking helmet on and fix that ASAP.

    175. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      But we don't live in a barbaric system. Your money is the only real voice and leverage you have.

    176. Re:ARGH by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Start MENU works. What I'm talking about is a button at the bottom of my Winbook tablet, that looks like the Windows logo. When one touches it, it behaves identically to the Start icon at the south west corner of the screen. At least it did, under both Windows 8 and Windows 10, but the most recent update Microsoft did resulted in it no longer working. Microcenter was unable to fix it for me, and they have this particular model being compatible w/ some revisions of Windows update, but not others.

    177. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the registry is a part of Microsoft's operating system, it is probably against their license agreement to edit it anyways, so there is probably no recourse for people who have had this happen. Just turn off automatic recommended updates, uninstall the kb 3035583 update, then check for updates and hide that one when it shows up. Maybe even change your updated to check but don't automatically download/install them. Then manually look up each update when you do check to make sure it isn't a hidden GWX update.

    178. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      There are benefits to that as long as MS plays fair.

    179. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Well sir, you have managed to be the black sheep. You and the 12 others remaining should have a meet and greet. :)))

      I haven't see a modern board with floppy support in at least 5 years. USB floppy drives are impossible to find in retail stores.

      But honestly, if you need a floppy drive I would think just any other hardware other than the one you actually use day to day will do the job. We too have really old hardware that requires floppies in time of troubleshooting (once in a blue moon).

      So MS did good by removing old support which was needed by less than 0.001% of it's user base.

    180. Re:ARGH by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      How strange. Windows 10 is far superior to previous versions. And they haven't done any major changes to the interface that would put you off either. Why are you insistent on using outdated crap?

    181. Re:ARGH by macs4all · · Score: 1

      So, should we surrender the four years that we paid for to be hip and with the times?

      What's fair and what's reality are two entirely separate things. The short answer is -yes- get with the times; IT is a moving target of progress. There are cheaper options however; you can virtualize old Windows 95 boxes if you require legacy 16bit code to run over a mapped RS232 port as an example. It's ugly, but VM-ing an obsolete OS that's bound to custom legacy applications is doable.

      Another way is to run the old OS in another Partition (or another HD) and then use a bootloader. I assume that will work for Windows. That's how we do it in the OS X world when we have legacy software that is incompatible with a new OS X version, or just want to try out a new version of the OS.

      Of course, OS X makes that really easy, with its built-in bootloader, and the ability to resize partitions nondestructively. But, IIRC, NTFS will allow nondestructive repartitioning, too.

    182. Re:ARGH by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I personally decided not to fully turn off telemetry. The reason why is because I want Microsoft to see that I don't give a shit about the app store, cortana, Bing searches, or edge, and that I just want an ordinary desktop OS, not an Apple iOS wannabe.

    183. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 computer that's been running 200+ days straight.

      That's the problem right there. No drivers or OS updates and you went straight to 10... come on dude. (I'm being playful in case you didn't get it).

      Not all installs went perfect and MS was available at no charge to assist via chat and forums. For those still having access to their free call they could call in and get support until the incident was resolved. People make it sound much worst than it really is because they overreact to inconvenience or to what they don't understand.

    184. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is tired of supporting old ass insecure software. ....

      ....chomp...

      So I'm just curious, what would Microsoft have to do for you to say "That crossed the line, that's too much"? Because routing around your manual settings to avoid being forced an update and then attempting to force a 6 GB update on you apparently isn't it.

      My side bet is the astounding pile of national security letters involving the millions of
      hacked machines world wide being used to mount DOS and other infrastructure
      attacks caused spooky folk world wide to put their cross hairs on MS.

      For a US company to be the software vector for the world's largest infrastructure
      responsibility to not act in light of their historic sloppy ways risks jail time and
      extradition should any wish to travel to ski in Switzerland, to drink good whisky in the UK,
      to drink fine wine in France.... well stupid foolish..

      The desktop product does seem to have a well considered mandatory access
      control system to allow system management by IT departments and lacking
      an IT department by Redmond. Time will tell if they got it right. One of the qualities
      of the MS security model is that is is opaque at many levels. It is hard to discover
      what they have done and analyse the design. This makes it difficult for the
      peanut gallery to comment. Some do have the tools and the resources to explore
      it -- they may never disclose that they learn....

      Time will tell but what this does tell me is that the geeks that care would do
      well to establish a management domain that sits between MS and machines
      you care about and start learning this PITA stuff.

      Me -- time to dust off my Gentoo system..

    185. Re:ARGH by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1

      Same here. Windows 10 wouldn't see my NIC. I had no network access at all. Couldn't find the drivers online (checked from my Linux workstation) and ended up reverting after a day of trying to get it to work. Won't be trying that again!

      --
      The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
    186. Re:ARGH by mannd · · Score: 1

      Not only that, living in a rural area with only 3Mbps DSL internet available, the background automatic download takes hours and during it all other internet access is slowed down even more than baseline (and it sucks baseline). I knew I should have stuck with Vista (joke).

      --
      Sig expected Real Soon Now.
    187. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apps!

    188. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apps!!!

    189. Re:ARGH by Druegan · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering what kind of "support" Microsoft has had to offer to "old ass insecure software". I ran XP for years, and once I went into services.msc and turned off all of MS's fucking useless "features", 95% of my security problems disappeared. I didn't even run realtime antivirus or a firewall. Just a once a month series of scans and clean routines with a couple free programs. Very rarely did I wind up catching anything.

      Windows 7, same deal. Gut all the bullshit "features", Run noscript and adblock+ on a non-microsoft browser, Disable windows update, and in the year I've been running it, Zero infections on any of the same once-monthly scans.

      Seems to me, the biggest *disservice" Microsoft does to end users is "supporting old ass insecure software".. Their products work just fine when you strip all the crap out of them...

    190. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll much?

    191. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your blaming Microsoct because your internal software sucks?

    192. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You turned off all tbe security on your computer. Then thought you were more secure? Good one!

    193. Re: ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the internet and look up the updates that make this notification appear. There is 2 or 3 of them. Write down their numbers (eg. KB158546). It starts with a KB and then some random numbers. These update to Windows cause these notifications to pop up. Then go into the control panel and into Windows Updates. Look at what updates are installed. You can then uninstall the ones that cause this. Reboot computer and no more annoying messages. You do have to turn off automatic updates to keep it this way. The next time it would update, it sees they are missing and will put them right back on.

    194. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really care what they screw up on those things, I have no responsibility for them. I hope they all crash and burn.

      One way to infect an organization with an unsecured and secured networks, say a power company, is to crack into the office network, insert a harmful document used in the production and socially engineer the secure network user to download the "latest operating manual" version from the unsecured network. Isolate yourselves also from the burning office network.

    195. Re:ARGH by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Yeah I never got this. Releasing a "new and improved" operating system that lacks even the features of the old one... If they really want people to upgrade so badly, they should try addressing the missing WMC issue. That said I find I use WMC less and less simply because the supported codecs are so terrible. While I use VLC more and more, it is leaps and bound better as a player, it lacks a lot of the content management features. A few years ago I tried one of the skins/plugins to enable this sort of functionality to VLC, but it was pretty terrible. Since Windows 10 has come up, I've googled up some alternatives, and though I haven't tried them, many (at least on paper) seem to fit the bill. However I also have a WMC remote which I use, which would probably have to be hacked to use it with anything else or buy something new which I don't really want to have to bother to do... Most of which seem to be bluetooth, which I have had mixed results with (some devices it seems have a such a short range to effectively make them useless, even though they all say they support the 10m standard).

    196. Re:ARGH by Revarg · · Score: 1

      "if you are not the consumer, you are the product"

    197. Re:ARGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not installing itself without permission. That's an outright lie that's been perpetuated by a bunch of anti-MS trolls and people too stupid to disbelieve something so obviously BS.

      Yes, they're downloading it without permission, that sucks, but virtually every instance where someone has "claimed" it happened has been debunked as the bullshit it is. Stop pushing this lie.

    198. Re:ARGH by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Ah thanks for the TLS -> LTS fix. I swear I'm not dyslexic. :-)

      And yes, It is Ubuntu, but I don't think most people care which distro. others use.

    199. Re:ARGH by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is, it is OK for M$ to steal people's bandwidth because 'er' 'um' they are stealing from everyone with windows installed and they are 'er' 'um' not stealing that much on a individual basis but in total they are stealing millions of dollars of bandwidth. Mind you they are not stealing once but hugely invading your privacy with the install and stealing all your personal data, monitoring everything you do, key logger, network connections, files, emails, skype, invasively and pervertedly prying into every inch of your private life. As far as they are concerned no choice, bend over, drop your pants and pucker up the windows probe is ready to be inserted, want it or not. There is not defence for this abuse and they should be criminally punished for it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    200. Re:ARGH by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is, it is OK for M$ to steal people's bandwidth because 'er' 'um' they are stealing from everyone with windows installed

      I didn't say that. I said is wasn't as much a concern as say the invasion of the interface. 3GB for the average household is a drop in the bucket these days.

      Mind you they are not stealing once but hugely invading your privacy with the install and stealing all your personal data, monitoring everything you do, key logger, network connections, files, emails, skype, invasively and pervertedly prying into every inch of your private life. As far as they are concerned no choice, bend over, drop your pants and pucker up the windows probe is ready to be inserted, want it or not. There is not defence for this abuse and they should be criminally punished for it.

      I wasn't tackling that issue but regardless they have OPT OUT options. One could argue they should be off by default but it's not so...

      If you take 1 minute and portray MS as a good guy for once. Check this blog post that explains why they did this, how it's benefited the OS and how MS understands trust is required and needs to be earned...
      https://blogs.windows.com/wind...

      What most forget to include as part of their rant on MS is that no "sensitive" data is collected on purpose. It's the same as crash logs in Windows 7. A crash log report can be sent to MS and there's a chance sensitive data is included. That's reality but isn't the objective of the exercise. I think people reveal far more private information on social media than Windows 10 ever will.

  2. uninstall! by Sleuth · · Score: 0

    So, just uninstall that update?

    1. Re:uninstall! by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

      Exactly...works for me and keeps the nagging away. And while you're at it uninstall the updates that backported the data monitoring from Windows 10 as well.

    2. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can uninstall it and hide the update like I've done multiple times, but if you have Windows Update set to automatically install it will un-hide itself and install itself again.
      I think I read somewhere that Microsoft releases an "update" to that update, which un-hides it.

    3. Re:uninstall! by Sleuth · · Score: 1

      So wrong...

    4. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even close to the point.

    5. Re:uninstall! by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      So, just uninstall that update?

      One would think. Unfortunately, even if one opts to decline and "hide" KB3035583, Windows 7 and 8.1 will try to reinstall it if the system's setting is "Install updates automatically". So basically, the only way to avoid the bastard is to turn off automatic updating, and manually opt to "hide" KB3035583 every time Windows wants to reinstall it. (I imagine that the reason it keeps popping back up in the update ledger is because Microsoft is changing it, i.e. "updating the update". I also am assuming that Microsoft is avoiding issuing it a version number to intentionally keep this whole matter obscure, but I can't say for certain.)

    6. Re:uninstall! by JDAustin · · Score: 1

      What about setting permission on the registry folder to read-only?

    7. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'silently redownloads 6 GB' - nice for people on a toll line. Each time they delete it, they get to pay another couple hundred bucks for something they didn't want.

    8. Re:uninstall! by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      It's not wrong. I have set KB3035583 to "Hidden" and it pops up in my update ledger again and again.

    9. Re:uninstall! by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

      They've done that dozens of times with Silverlight.

    10. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people allow Windows Update to install "Recommended" updates automatically in the first place? Turn that shit off!

      The "Important" updates is where you get the stuff you need, i.e. security patches. "Recommended" means "anything alse Microsoft wants to bung on your system"; if Microsoft wants to recommend that you upgrade to Windows 10, that's fair enough from their side. If you only install "Important" updates, then it's not an issue.

    11. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly...works for me and keeps the nagging away. And while you're at it uninstall the updates that backported the data monitoring from Windows 10 as well.

      I've tried. Repeatedly. Every time, after the computer restarts, all the crap gets shoveled back on my machine. Microsoft also changed my Windows Update setting from "never do anything, I'll check for and apply updates manually" to "always check for updates and install everything". B@stards.

    12. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is definitely unhiding and re-installing itself. It's a total PITA

    13. Re:uninstall! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Windows 7 and 8.1 will try to reinstall it if the system's setting is "Install updates automatically

      Well, that is fundamentally the problem.

      You simply cannot trust Microsoft here. If you allow them to alter your system as they see fit, they're going to .... and in the process they'll eventually take away your ability to stop them.

      They've also started lying about/concealing what updates do. They just say "this addresses issues with Windows", when what it's really doing it adding telemetry and other shit designed to benefit only themselves.

      With Windows 10, Microsoft have become malware, and the will keep trying to shove this up your ass until they succeed or you forcibly stop them. All they'll do it re-issue it with a different number and keep trying.

      I wonder if Microsoft understands (or cares) the extent to which they are pissing people off, and forcing people to start rejecting updates on the assumption they can't be trusted.

      It just seems like they have decided it is their computer, and you don't get a vote. This seems to me like it's a violation of the computer fraud and abuse act or whatever it is .. but apparently assholes with EULAs can do anything they want to.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:uninstall! by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, the default install of Windows 7 and 8.1 will have "Install updates automatically" on by default. And if you turn it off, the "action center" will warn you that it's a terrible decision and you should turn them back on. That will scare >90% of people into keeping them on.

    15. Re:uninstall! by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I uninstalled it and sure enough it appeared the next day somehow. I have Windows Update set to automatic download but I always actually do the update. I ended up installing GWX Control Panel and it seems to work somehow....also disabled automatic download.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    16. Re:uninstall! by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      So basically, the only way to avoid the bastard is to turn off automatic updating,

      When the unknown notification started showing up in my task bar, the first thing I did was see what the executable behind it was and ... delete it and the entire directory that contained it. Pretty easy, except for the two-stage permission change so I could nuke it.

      Never came back. gwx.exe.

    17. Re:uninstall! by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      So: your computer is acting against your instructions; a deliberate act by Microsoft. Time for a class action to recover those toll charges ?

    18. Re:uninstall! by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of people know fuck all about security and will never update anything on their own. The alternative to turning on automatic updates is them running an unpatched system that they'll have someone reformat and reinstall in a few months after they've managed to pick up a dozen different types of malware.

    19. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I have set KB3035583 to "Hidden" and it pops up in my update ledger again and again.

      There are two updates each called KB3035583.

      I have both blocked and don't see either. (There may be a third one now; haven't checked recently.)

    20. Re: uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then it gets reinstalled on the next update cycle.

    21. Re:uninstall! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You can uninstall it and hide the update like I've done multiple times, but if you have Windows Update set to automatically install it will un-hide itself and install itself again.

      Indeed. It's known as the Hotel California patch.

      It's also annoying that you get it on machines that cannot run Windows 10 due to lack of drivers.

    22. Re:uninstall! by johanw · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use this script to clean people's Windows 7 computers up:

      wusa /uninstall /kb:3035583 /quiet /norestart

      and the same for

      kb:2952664
      kb:3022345
      kb:3068708
      kb:3075249
      kb:3080149
      kb:3021917
      kb:3083324
      kb:2977759
      kb:3112343

      (sorry, I can't post a cut and paste script herre, get an error about a compression filter).

      Then I hide those updates in windows update, and uncheck automatic updates because MS keeps switching them on and I'm not sure they will eventually push windows 10 as a security update.

    23. Re:uninstall! by johanw · · Score: 1

      Installing an adblocker, virusscanner and click to play flash will solve most of that too.

    24. Re:uninstall! by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Updating Windows is too hard for some people (when they could just check 'install recommended updates'), so the suggestion is to have them download and install and update three separate things?

    25. Re:uninstall! by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I found it that update had managed to re-install itself as well, I think I've re-installed it twice. Back in December Microsoft said they were going to start auto-downloading Windows 10 so I disabled automatic updates all together. It's kind of annoying to have to manually install the updates for Windows Defender, but it's worth it.

      I'm not upgrading to Windows 10 because I have a software RAID and I have no faith in the upgrade process (and I don't have enough storage to completely back up the RAID). It's my last Windows PC anyway, once Apple comes out with a Thunderbolt 3 iMac I'll move to that plus an external RAID, until then I'm fine with Windows 8.1 Pro. I do wish that they would be a bit more respectful of their users, but I can't very well expect good treatment for someone who's leaving their platform anyway.

      I also handle IT purchasing for my company, Windows 10 takes about 3x longer to set up than Windows 8.1 machines did, so I'm hoping given the cost of my time I'll be able to convince management it's finally time to stop buying Windows machines. 90% of the users prefer Macs anyway, and you don't have to pay extra for HD encryption or fight with the printer driver to convince it the printer isn't "offline".

      One thing Microsoft really screwed up with on 10: I should be able to disable notifications for an app BEFORE it starts generating them. Right now every time I re-setup a Windows 10 PC I have to get the touchpad notification to trigger so I can disable it.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    26. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should know by now that microsoft can override ALL security settings you have.
      I tried this by locking down the GWX folder so tight that now even I cant mess with it anymore (even as fucking administrator) BUT GUESS WHO STILL CAN!!! YES FUCKING MICROSOFT!

    27. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still comes back next update, even if you deny all access to the folder, ms finds a way to fuck you in the ass.

    28. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's your issue if you install updates automatically.

      I set WinUpdate to manual, and easily instruct the Action Center never to bother me again when I turn it off completely (a 10+ year old Windows laptop with very low memory couldn't run with WU enabled on startup without killing performance).

    29. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also "pissing off" a very small amount of people (compared to their userbase).

      Non-nerds will take the freebie upgrade -- why not? You're saving 100s of dollars in upgrade fees. Others will just simply say yes because it's there (like the "OMG YOU'RE ABOUT TO DELETE EVERYTHING or VIRUSES LIKELY HERE ignored warnings")

    30. Re:uninstall! by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Except that I found out the hard way that the /quiet option means that any problems uninstalling will also be hidden. For some reason the script I made didn't uninstall any of the patches until I removed the /quiet option.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    31. Re:uninstall! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Same with that darn Silverlight feature that unhides itself all the time.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    32. Re:uninstall! by meadow · · Score: 1

      What the heck is Silverlight? I never checked that update for so long, then finally one time I was just sick of constantly seeing it and so checked it. I still don't know what it is and never saw anything about it.

    33. Re:uninstall! by sgage · · Score: 1

      That's what I've done, and I haven't had a trace of GWX stuff since. I have Update set to ask me before downloading and installing updates, so I can vet them. Is it really that hard? No. Should I have to do this? No. Is it a pain in the ass? Yes. But my Windows 7 is uncontaminated...

    34. Re:uninstall! by burtosis · · Score: 1

      With Windows 10, Microsoft have become malware, and the will keep trying to shove this up your ass until they succeed or you forcibly stop them.

      No means no. They really need to be brought up on computer molestation charges.

    35. Re:uninstall! by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      With Windows 10, Microsoft have become malware, and the will keep trying to shove this up your ass until they succeed or you forcibly stop them. All they'll do it re-issue it with a different number and keep trying.

      And here is the kicker - what will they do next? If you had posted a prediction of what the Window$ 10 roll-out would entail a year ago, and described all the deceptive, self-serving behaviors that Micro$oft has served up M$ apologists would have laughed at and mocked you for your paranoia. With M$, anyone who is not paranoiac is not a realist.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    36. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You simply cannot trust ANYONE here.

      Microsoft's vile attempts at ramming Win10 down our throats aside...

      This is like throwing yum -y update or the equivalent apt-get (or whatever) on cron, then complaining when you suddenly wake up to SystemD.

      Nobody on Slashdot should be stupid enough to blindly apply updates, to anything, from any source.

    37. Re:uninstall! by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "Hiding" the update does absolutely nothing.
      For another example, make sure you don't have Silverlight installed then scan for updates. Hide the "DERP PLZ INSTALL SILVERLIGHT" update, then scan for updates again.

    38. Re:uninstall! by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Silverlight simply unhides itself every time you scan for updates.

    39. Re:uninstall! by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      True, just installed 7 and that update keeps coming again, If only someone could provide an app to block the download and monitor urls in DNS. So far the host file is still respected in win7, right?

    40. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems to me like it's a violation of the computer fraud and abuse act or whatever it is .. but apparently assholes with EULAs can do anything they want to.

      According to Wikipedia, the only computers covered under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act are defined as computers

      exclusively for the use of a financial institution or the United States Government, or any computer, when the conduct constituting the offense affects the computer's use by or for the financial institution or the Government; or

              which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or communication, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United States...

      In practice this expands to any computer only when the justice department wants to persecute someone like Aaron Swartz. But like you also said, I'll bet there is something in the EULA that allows MS to "improve performance" or some such BS.

    41. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the heck is Silverlight? I never checked that update for so long, then finally one time I was just sick of constantly seeing it and so checked it. I still don't know what it is and never saw anything about it.

      It was their attempt to reproduce (and vendor-lockin) their own equivalent of Adobe Flash/Adobe Air.

    42. Re:uninstall! by tijgertje · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to get the windows pc's out of the business here. First trying the pc's downstairs (no MS-office) later the pc's in the office :) Die Microsoft, die.

    43. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for %%a in ( 3068708 3022345 2952664 2990214 3035583 971033 3021917 3044374 3080149 3075249 3068708 3021917 2976978 3112343 ) do start "" /w wusa /uninstall /kb:%%a /quiet /norestart

    44. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after that:
      - kill gwx process
      - disable autoupdates
      - in task scheduler remove /disable all gwx and telemetry entries (under TSL/Ms/Windows/customer experience inprovement program; under application experience disable the AITAgent and ProgramDataUpdater tasks. Look for GWX entries in another branches)
      - change owner of "c:\windows\system32\gwx" folder (or wherever you have it), than remove contents, set restrictive rights to folder (so eg no process/no user at all has access) or remove folder and make "GWX" file instead
      - in future do updates only some time after release, reading in the net if they are desired or not.

    45. Re:uninstall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running as limited user takes care of the rest..

  3. Fine by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This would be fine, if it actually worked. The Win 10 upgrade doesn't work on my system, for no other reason other than I converted from Spinning drive to SSD drive. The Win 10 Upgrade borks about half way through the install.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re: Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > "my system" :chuckle:

    2. Re:Fine by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

      Strange, it handled my upgrade just fine, though I had been running win7 on the SSD for awhile by that point, I did run a fresh win7 install when i installed the SSD, and even migrated that to a newer SSD just before the win10 upgrade. For the amount of time I spend at my desktop i haven't had any issues with 10 yet, all my apps worked, punkbuster was the 1 exception, the exe was in the wrong spot. It works fine, updates fine. I will admit that I'm getting tired to having to reset my privacy settings after updates, but whatever, it functions perfectly and in some instances, faster than win7 on the same box. That said, if I didn't want it, and it kept downloading 6 gigs over and over, I'd be opening a class action lawsuit against MS on behalf of anyone with metered internet, you could use up your data cap just pulling the update you don't want.

    3. Re:Fine by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      So you're fine with the fact that Microsoft sent down an update, with no description appended to it, which bypasses your settings and downloads 6 GB of crap without telling you?

    4. Re:Fine by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not fine with it. I accept it as part of being in the Microsoft ecosystem. Kind of like Android People are okay with Google Spying on them, and Apple's Walled garden.

      Life is full of compromises. If you don't want the compromise, run your own build of Linux you compiled yourself. Its the ONLY way to be sure (if you can be sure of anything)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:Fine by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People bought Google and Apple products knowing that there was telemetry and a walled garden. Nobody bought Windows 7 believing that Microsoft would forcefully seize control of their computers and disable their manually-changed settings.

    6. Re:Fine by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      i'm having that issue just trying to upgrade my windows 10 to the november update... going from 8.1 to 10 was fine -_-

    7. Re:Fine by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      You trusted Microsoft?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be fine, if it actually worked. The Win 10 upgrade doesn't work on my system, for no other reason other than I converted from Spinning drive to SSD drive. The Win 10 Upgrade borks about half way through the install.

      It failed for me also, don't know why, did a clean Win7 install, then update, then clean Win10 install, worked like a charm

    9. Re:Fine by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      This would be fine, if it actually worked. The Win 10 upgrade doesn't work on my system, for no other reason other than I converted from Spinning drive to SSD drive. The Win 10 Upgrade borks about half way through the install.

      Hah, I get this annoying notification on one of my systems. And then it says "Unfortunately this PC is unable to run Windows 10". Basically the graphics driver is out of date and there's no hope for it.

      So now I get bothered and the thing doesn't even give me the option to have it stop. Why nag me when the thing says Windows 10 won't even work?!

    10. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think this is what you meant to say.

    11. Re:Fine by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Nobody bought Windows 7 believing that Microsoft would forcefully seize control of their computers and disable their manually-changed settings.

      Well, it was just sort of assumed, wasn't it?

    12. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference being that I trust Google with my data. THEY don't sell off my info to 3rd parties. MS does.

    13. Re:Fine by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      I'm running a Samsung SSD. I had no issues upgrading from Windows 7 to Windows 10 or downgrading back to Windows 7 because Windows 10 is hideous to look at and massively violates your privacy.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    14. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope i tried to file a violation of the CFAA act against them but the local prosecutor laughed me out of the court house not even understanding my complaint.

    15. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, you think only Google is "spying" on you because they're the most transparent out of the bunch.

      How cute.

    16. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft spies on you just as much as Google. Cortana is their biggest information-gathering agent, but plenty is baked right into the OS now, and has been back ported to win 7 too.

      The moment you connect your pc to the Internet, you can just expect that everything you have done on it (even prior offline activities on programs that don't use the Internet at all) is known to Microsoft (and the NSA). There is no privacy *at all,* apart from Linux (and even then your privacy is limited).

    17. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody bought Windows 7 believing that Microsoft would forcefully seize control of their computers and disable their manually-changed settings.

      Verbiage reserving the right to that kind of thing has been present since Windows XP at least. If you failed to read your agreements for 10 years, you deserve what you get. i quit much earlier because of the absolutely ridiculous terms.

      People's apathy about reading and understanding licenses not just enabled the escalation in Windows licensing but also encouraged Apple to try going batshit insane with theirs. Microsoft is catching up, though.

    18. Re:Fine by Agent0013 · · Score: 2

      People bought Google and Apple products knowing that there was telemetry and a walled garden. Nobody bought Windows 7

      First of all, I never buy Windows. Pirating their OS is the only option as far as I am concerned. If they didn't manipulate the market to get themselves into a monopoly position I would have a different opinion. But I want to play the games that require powerful graphics cards and those work better on Windows. I do like that Steam is making it less of a requirement though.

      believing that Microsoft would forcefully seize control of their computers and disable their manually-changed settings.

      I fully believe that Microsoft will screw up my system. This is why I disable all updates. I have never trusted them and don't find that my system gets compromised from not being up to date on their updates. Safe computing goes a long way!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    19. Re:Fine by lurker412 · · Score: 2

      Well, not exactly. MSFT's "ecosystem" used to give end users more choices than Apple's walled garden. In my personal experience, it appears that MSFT has decided to limit the choices and start imposing their corporate will. I'm on Win7 Pro. I have now uninstalled KB3035583 three or four times. I had my Windows update preferences set to download but let me decide, but several months ago, it stopped letting me decide and just installed what it wanted at boot time. Now I have changed my preferences to let me know when there are updates and let me download and install when I want. Somehow, I doubt that it's going to do what I want. I have no opinion about Win10, but in the past I have always migrated to new operating systems at the same time as I bought a new machine. Win7 works just fine for me at the moment, so why should I run the risk that some of my older applications are going to break by installing a new OS? More than that--the last two times I bought a new machine, I went out of my way to install an older, more stable OS: XP when Vista was about a year old, and Win7 when Win8 was already predominant in new sales. I spared myself lots of grief that way. I may decide I want Win10 someday, but if Msft chooses to shove it down my throat, I will (reluctantly, as long time Windows user) tell them where they can shove it.

    20. Re:Fine by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      LOL ... perfect!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    21. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android telemetry is opt-in. It's off by default, and to even get the option to turn it on you have to install gapps.

    22. Re:Fine by meadow · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree with your line of thinking. As a consumer and a citizen you have rights and in civilized society we agree on certain sets of rules regarding what is acceptable and what is not. Even if you individually chose to waive your civil or consumer rights, it would not be considered valid nor acceptable from a legal standpoint.

      The European Union is much further along at recognizing and enforcing rights in the area of information technology. But just because you as a consumer are happy to accept violations of your rights does not vindicate the violation of those rights.

    23. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, I never buy Windows. Pirating their OS is the only option as far as I am concerned.

      And that means that you're part of the problem. If you don't like Windows, you always have the option of not running Windows. Running a pirated version of Windows does nothing but increase its market share.

      If they didn't manipulate the market to get themselves into a monopoly position I would have a different opinion. But I want to play the games that require powerful graphics cards and those work better on Windows. I do like that Steam is making it less of a requirement though.

      A big part of Windows being where it is is because people like you are pirating Windows instead of running Something Else(tm). Microsoft would, of course, prefer that you pay for your copy of Windows, but running a pirated version is better (for MS) instead of running literally any other Operating System. Game publishers aren't stupid, either. Of course they're primarily targeting Windows platforms, pirated or not, since that's where the bulk of their sales come from. So, running pirated Windows is hurting the case for bringing games to other Operating Systems.

      I fully believe that Microsoft will screw up my system. This is why I disable all updates. I have never trusted them and don't find that my system gets compromised from not being up to date on their updates. Safe computing goes a long way!

      Of course you don't keep up with updates. I'm no huge Microsoft fan, either, but not keeping up with security updates for a computer actively connected to the Internet and used every day is just dumb. Yeah, Microsoft screws up from time to time, but running an unpatched version of the most-targeted platform for malware in the world means that it's not a question if if you'll get compromised, it's when, no matter how safe you think you're being.

    24. Re:Fine by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      So you're fine with the fact that Microsoft sent down an update, with no description appended to it, which bypasses your settings and downloads 6 GB of crap without telling you?

      It only does this if you didn't configure your machine correctly.

    25. Re:Fine by ErstO · · Score: 1

      The part I cant figure out is why? whats so important that we all must upgrade to what is basically a free upgrade. I’m running Win 7 in VMware on my Mac and the commercial accounting program we use is not yet patched for Win 10 so I cant upgrade. Why is Microsoft insisting everyone must upgrade?

    26. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just 2 piss u of.

    27. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the error code, how new is your bios, which chip-set you have, did you have a default partition structure with sufficiently large system and recovery partitions, did you have to re-activate your windows after the ssd conversion, and so on and so on.. One system I upgraded didn't have a recovery partition at all. The install process had failed many times before I reduced the size of the whole disk OS partition and behold, the install had created a recovery partition, not on the newly freed space but instead it had reduced the OS partition again to hold the new recovery partition.

    28. Re: Fine by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Seminal work on chess by Nimzowitsch?

    29. Re:Fine by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Then those people are the same that would willingly buy a lemon car and ocean front property in Arizona. The reason why Google can get away with spying is Microsoft did it first.

    30. Re:Fine by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      running an unpatched version of the most-targeted platform for malware in the world means that it's not a question if if you'll get compromised, it's when, no matter how safe you think you're being.

      8 years and counting for me, last time I had an issue was when a friend with an infected flashdrive came over to use my computer.

      My secret? I don't download sketchy shit from GETDRIVERSNOW.COM or click on FREE GAMES AND MOUSE CURSORS ads.

      The one time in years I decided to use my legit copy of windows was a week ago. It immediately downloaded 300 something updates, started applying them on shutdown and hung for hours on update 279. A hard reset later and it's impossible to boot and inserting the disc and attempting to repair ended in failure. All this even though I had updates disabled.

      Thanks, I'll stick with my pirated copy. The legit copy can continue gathering dust on my shelf.

    31. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no huge Microsoft fan, either, but not keeping up with security updates for a computer actively connected to the Internet and used every day is just dumb.

      No, it's smart. I have updates disabled and I have never had any system compromised AND I don't have to deal with this forceful Windows 10 spyware shit. Most of the updates Microsoft push out are more buggy than the systems I already have in place. It's like the old saying goes "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".

      If you know how to properly configure a firewall and don't run random executables from shady sources, then you'll never have a problem. I don't even run active antivirus or malware, I just scan programs before using them and only get things from trustworthy and/or legally accountable sources.

    32. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My firewall prevents Microsoft from getting *anything* from my PCs.

    33. Re: Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're projecting. Some of us are smart enough to own our computers.

    34. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nobody".

      I assume by that you mean "people who don't think critically about who owns and controls the software you run on your hardware".

      As if anyone posting here would install Windows thinking Microsoft wouldn't exercise their ability to completely control the system if they thought it were beneficial to them.

    35. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The part I cant figure out is why? whats so important that we all must upgrade to what is basically a free upgrade. Iâ(TM)m running Win 7 in VMware on my Mac and the commercial accounting program we use is not yet patched for Win 10 so I cant upgrade. Why is Microsoft insisting everyone must upgrade?

      If it was your PC, you'd be right.

      Up until Win10, it was your PC. In the five years between Win7 and Win10 (and arguably the decade and a half between XP and 10), Microsoft has decided that it's not your PC, it's Microsoft's Phone.

      PCs - general purpose computing devices - run what the users tell them and can refuse updates from the manufacturer.

      Phones - appliances - require regular upgrading when Vendors drop support for them. Throw out your 1920x1200 monitor and get one with touch for Win8. Win10 is supported "for the life of the device."

      It turned out that there was more money in phones - the Vendor (MS, AAPL, GOOG) can make you buy a new phone (PC, iPhone, Android handset or tablet) simply by requiring an "upgrade" (Win10, OS X /Android n+1, where "n" is the last version your hardware supports, and so on) to render your phone either nonfunctional or exposed to unpatched security vulneratbilities.

      So no, the fact that you get no value out of Win10 means nothing to Microsoft, because you're no longer the customer, you're the product. You have my condolences. We're in the same boat.

      Fuck the concept of Services as a Software Substitute. And fuck all the Vendors who roll that way.

    36. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron if you don't apply security patches. Microsoft would probably be sued into oblivion if they maliciously backdoored a security patch, so you really should trust them.

    37. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pirated Windows 8.1 simply because retail copies aren't available in my area. Because it's pirated it can't be upgraded to Windows 10. Only had to remove the upgrade reminder once. Turing off Windows Updates entirely? Put bluntly, that's fucking stupid.

    38. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody bought Windows 7 believing that Microsoft would forcefully seize control of their computers and disable their manually-changed settings.

      Do you have evidence? Any anecdotes? Anything?

      Most folks I know are what I would call minimally tech savvy. They know there's a difference between Windows and Mac, they might have even heard of Linux. They associate Windows with affordable and Mac with premium (or maybe they buy into the Apple ecosystem). I doubt the give a rats ass about what the OS does or who controls it. They are only answering the question "I need a computer to get on the internet. What can I afford?"

      I bet there's a lot of purchases made because the words "Free OS upgrade" were mentioned.

    39. Re:Fine by Ikemeister · · Score: 1

      Have you tried adding an account yet? I installed and couldn't add accounts. Ended up buggering it and had to reinstall Windows 8 and upgrade to 8.8 -- not that I'm thrilled about the Windows 8.1 GUI though certainly way better than Windows 8. There's a long thread about the problem in the Microsoft Community forums http://answers.microsoft.com/t...

    40. Re:Fine by dakohli · · Score: 1

      I have two HP Stream Minis. One upgraded fine to Windows 10, the other did not. The one that did, is now running a couple of services on my home network, and the other is now running linux and is a media machine. To be fair, the Streams came with a 32G SSD with a recovery partition, so only had about 24G of drive space, which windows 7 took up a big chunk, and once the downloads started, they choked up pretty fast. In retrospect, I'm surprised that one of them did upgrade properly.

  4. Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, people, why would anyone tolerate this bullshit? It's being made amply clear that Microsoft doesn't give a good goddamn what you, the end user, actually wants to do, doesn't respect the fact that your computer is your property and not theirs, and is just pushing their way through to do whatever the hell they want. How is this even legal? Why is there not a massive lawsuit against Microsoft at this point? How is it that they think they have the right to shove Windows 10 down everyone's throat?

    1. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by mythosaz · · Score: 0

      You're not forced to use Windows at all. Run whatever you want on your hardware. ...but if you do run an older version of Windows - one that's going to stop being updated - it's going to remind you regularly to upgrade to the current version.

    2. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Ravaldy · · Score: 0

      IMO there are things far worst than the nagging MS is doing such as web site popup advertising, malware, spyware. Just so were clear, I'm not in agreement with their methods assuming the article and other comments are accurate. I personally didn't experience this because I moved to Windows 10 within 3 months of launch.

    3. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no different than our politics or cars or anything else, we will eat any shit that is put in front of us.

    4. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just one small user who wouldn't buy anything from their app store anyway, but this shit has driven me back to Linux for the foreseeable future, and all my development will now be done outside of the Microsoft ecosystem.

      "Why is there not a massive lawsuit against Microsoft at this point?"

      Any lawyers in the house?

    5. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      In no OS I have ever used, except Windows 7 and 8.1, can the user manually tune their system settings to avoid getting updates, but then updates being rammed down your throat anyway--in such a way, no less, that specifically routes around the advice that the company gave you to avoid those very updates.

    6. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      In the UK, this would appear to be an offence under the "misuse of computers act" or whatever its called. This is a criminal act.

      Failing that, we now have class actions here, so how about it guys?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

      What are you gonna do?

      Stop playing PC games?

    8. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Probably because use of the software implies agreement to their terms. This imaginary butthurt is the stuff I can't tolerate. 99% of this coming from people who don't even run windows. It's the same way Apple has basically full ownership of you, your itunes content, and your dirty socks. You agreed to it by not reading the agreement. That said..... I think we do have a class action case here, but only for those people on metered internet.

      I guess I am the 1%. I am the admin in an office that needs Windows 7 -- our legacy software *will not run* on Windows 10. And I live in constant terror that no matter what settings I alter or updates I decline, that I'm going to walk in some Monday morning and find that Windows 10 rammed itself onto every computer.

    9. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      And you're just okay with these bad agreements? What about the users who want to refuse but can't because they need to be able to run J Random Software?

      Also, "99% of you aren't on Windows here" is bullshit.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    10. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Forcing upgrade to Windows 10 is preparation for micropayments.

      Microsoft's next step after they get everyone onto Windows 10 is to start charging a little it for everything.

      Want to use a third party browser? $5.

      Want to save files that are open? 10 cents per file.

      Want to change your theme color? 99 cents.

      Want Windows updates? Those will be $2 each, and if you don't install them your operating system will cease to function.

      Pretty soon after that Microsoft will start force installing updates and debiting your bank account without permission, and you'll allow it because Microsoft spends more on lawyers in a year than your government spends on health care.

    11. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by ZipK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ut if you do run an older version of Windows - one that's going to stop being updated - it's going to remind you regularly to upgrade to the current version.

      End of extended support for Win7 is January 2020; Win8 in 2023. No one needs to be nagged for five years.

    12. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> web site popup advertising, malware, spyware
      Nah. That does not exist any more.
      At least if you install the two necessary extensions in your browser.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    13. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably because use of the software implies agreement to their terms. This imaginary butthurt is the stuff I can't tolerate. 99% of this coming from people who don't even run windows. It's the same way Apple has basically full ownership of you, your itunes content, and your dirty socks. You agreed to it by not reading the agreement. That said..... I think we do have a class action case here, but only for those people on metered internet.

      So I'm just curious, what would Microsoft have to do for you to say "That crossed the line, that's too much"? Because routing around your manual settings to avoid being forced an update and then attempting to force a 6 GB update on you apparently isn't it.

    14. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by rochrist · · Score: 1

      It has at least four years to go before they stop updating it, and in any case, that doesn't justify them fucking around with my system behind my back.

    15. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by sbjornda · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing we'll only be nagged during the one year period when the upgrade is "free".

      --
      .nosig

    16. Re: Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes no more games. MS has sucessfully made it more painful to own a windows clusterfuck than the pleasure gained from PC Multiplayer games. Fuck you Microsoft.

    17. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Join the computer to a domain and you won't get Windows 10 rammed down your throat.

      I would be willing to bet that you could even join your Win10 to a Samba domain and achieve the same result.

      Even as it is right now, you can decline the installation part.

      I agree that if you are on a metered connection, it is a problem to download 6GB worth of stuff without notifying the user.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    18. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Embrace, extend, extort.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we should all move to GNU/Linux, except switch "Pay $X" with "it's FOSS, make it yourself".

    20. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      End of extended support for Win7 is January 2020; Win8 in 2023. No one needs to be nagged for five years.

      Except that MS wants to start gathering all your data *now* and Windows 10 does that.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    21. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      Linux game support has gotten pretty big anymore...

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    22. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, most Windows users tolerate this just fine. And the lawsuit is prevented by the EULA that comes with every version of Windows, in which you gave Microsoft permission to do precisely this.

    23. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by firewrought · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're not forced to use [[Ford]] at all. Run whatever you want on [[the road]]. But if you do run an older [[Ford]]--one that's going to stop being updated--it's going to remind you regularly to upgrade to the current version.

      Umm... nope, doesn't pass the car analogy test. Microsoft is engaging in user-hostile behavior.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    24. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Not all advertising, malware and spyware is stopped by these addons. In addition I'm a bit of a purist (That's just me). If someone is willing to cripple their website or web service with that garbage, then I don't have time for it and will find a better one. More people just take that approach instead of this PATCH that is the ad blockers.

    25. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just that. Win10 removes your devices and attempts to create them again - incorrectly. My 18" HP laptop always reverts to 1024x768 after that fucking shit does an update, and doesn't even ask me about it. My main machine loses it's HP LP3065 rendering it unusable as win10 doesn't even create a usable device. My PC has no usable screen when win10 gets into fucking updates.

      Thank fuck I have a Debian drive to go back to. Win10 is a disgrace. MS, fuck you and your shills in the media!

    26. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah great. Oh but wait... I'm running tons of software that is known not to work on Windows 10, and Windows 10 is known not to work properly on my laptop either...

    27. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Failing that, we now have class actions here [in Great Britain]

      Do you also have "class actions are forbidden; use individual arbitration instead" clauses in End User Licence Agreements?

    28. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by tepples · · Score: 1

      What's the price for "Want to wipe it and put on Debian"?

    29. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched to ubuntu about a year and a half ago and, thanks mainly to SteamOS,just about everything I want to play runs fine.

    30. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You haven't used many systems then, in most Linux systems it's up to you to decide when you do the updates and you can also exclude updates if you want in configuration files.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    31. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I don't trust that joining a computer to a domain will prevent it from getting updated in the future because M$ has decided that "it's safe".

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    32. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And no version of a Microsoft OS has stopped malware.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    33. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      That EULA writing may actually not be legal outside the US.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    34. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The EULA writing allowing them to do whatever they like may not be worth the weight of an A4 paper outside the United States.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    35. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Want to use a third party browser? $5.

      Go ahead and let them try that shit, it'll trigger the anti-trust lawsuit to end all lawsuits.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    36. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by mlw4428 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The Windows OS that runs on your machine is not yours. It's Microsoft's, that's the point of a License. Furthermore the lack of not updating is a major security risk for the entirety of everyone else. Microsoft *will* stop updating Windows 7. It's already transitioned out of Mainstream support. The upgrade is free. There is literally no reason to not upgrade (outside of maybe hardware upgrades). The philosophy for this comes from a security focused mentality. IT security isn't like immunization...there is no herd mentality. There is, however, the potential for an unsecured machine to negatively impact other users on a network. To put it in an analogy, it's sort of like the flu shot. You might have gotten the vaccine, but your coworker didn't and now your boss is telling you to pickup the slack. While you might be protected, there is the potential for other impacts (DDOS, spam email generation, easier point of entry into a secured network).

      The days of allowing people to ignore updating their system should be over. Everyone should be updated with at least the security patches. If you have software that breaks...tough luck. We all have a hand in the pot, especially if you're hooked up to the internet. And Microsoft is removing your choice, because you only own a license (permission) to use their OS...you don't actually own it. At least that's the argument they've used in the past.

    37. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, Microsoft only sells mice & keyboards. It *licenses* its software products and the customer never owns them.

      In two years "free" Windows 10 will be subscription based.

    38. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join the computer to a domain and you won't get Windows 10 rammed down your throat.

      Nope. My computer is part of a domain, but Microsoft keep trying to shove Windows 10 down my throat at every opportunity.

    39. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Document it and talk to lawyers beforehand.

    40. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forcing upgrade to Windows 10 is preparation for micropayments.

      Microsoft's next step after they get everyone onto Windows 10 is to start charging a little it for everything.

      Want to use a third party browser? $5.

      Want to save files that are open? 10 cents per file.

      Want to change your theme color? 99 cents.

      Want Windows updates? Those will be $2 each, and if you don't install them your operating system will cease to function.

      Pretty soon after that Microsoft will start force installing updates and debiting your bank account without permission, and you'll allow it because Microsoft spends more on lawyers in a year than your government spends on health care.

      You are soo fired! I told you never, ever to let them know what's in store for them.

    41. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, "99% of you aren't on Windows here" is bullshit.

      It's perhaps less than 99%, since OS X is around 10%, and desktop Linux is around 2%. I'd estimate that the percentage might be 80%-ish. Of course, this percentage is just for desktops and excludes mobiles such as phones and tablets, as I'm not sure whether /. has pages for them (but probably collects browser strings, inter alia).

      Our home is 100% on Linux. That's all of our PCs (2), laptops (3), and headless servers (3). We're completely Microsoft-free, and have been since 2004. Dual-booting from 1998 to 2004, but not since 2004. We also have Android phones (3), which counts as a sort of Linux as well.

    42. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You forget that you are the product. The Win10 downgrade being free made that amply clear.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    43. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't give them ideas

    44. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a great idea. And on January 14, 2020 when Windows 7, and January 10, 2023 when Windows 8 lose support, I would expect to see something. Until then, quit messing with settings I explicitly changed on MY system. Quit trying to force me to do an upgrade. Quit trying to trick people who do not understand what is going on into upgrading.
      I have been running Linux for many years. I keep Windows 7 in a virtual machine to do Windows development work on. I am tired of having to very carefully go through each update to make sure they don't try to sneak another "Oh, Your GOING to update whether you like it or not" thing in there.
      Starting to make me think Microsoft is trying to get out of the Desktop / Workstation OS business and just sell SaaS.

    45. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Except as the install base size increases, the probability that said functionality will be implemented by *someone* approaches 1.

      (probably for free but with questionable support)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    46. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Why do you think they want to lock down bootloaders?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    47. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a problem. I can quit anytime I want! ;)

    48. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently did. I moved every computer in my house to Mint so that I would no longer have to put up with it. I run Mint at both home and work and haven't had any problems so far. You can even play games using Steam now so even that isn't an issue.

    49. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I do. You can piss on retail and OEMs all you want and they'll thank you for it. You screw over large enterprise customers and that could result in the end of your business. For all of the negatives we've heard about MS on various OSes over the last 2 years one thing has been consistent: they've not only allowed enterprise users to opt out of the shit they are hitting us with, but defaulted them to do so.

    50. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you gonna do?

      Stop playing PC games?

      No, but I'll stop playing Windows games. There's Linux Steam, and *gasp* consoles, which have a lot of games that are on the PC anyway.

    51. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what does Nadella's d*ck taste like?

    52. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I think we do have a class action case here, but only for those people on metered internet."

      I don't recall my SSD coming with a free 6GB of extra space.

    53. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you you piece of shit

    54. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 really isn't much different than 7. A slight adjustment in user interface, better performance, and privacy questionable features aside. Most of your programs will run fine in it. There are better reasons for why you don't want to upgrade to it and program compatibility is rarely one. Microsoft did an excellent job on that. In fact, there is a Dell machine here at work that has an issue where when I install Win7 I have to go to Dell's website and enter our warranty information to find the drivers. But, when I install Win10, it already has the drivers and it just installs. It is definitely a better experience in a lot of regards, they did a good job on this OS. The privacy issues are probably the most important problem and most concerning to me, however. If you are a business though, Enterprise edition lets you turn off forced updates, reporting and telemetry completely ruling those issues out.

    55. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or inside

    56. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not forced to use Windows at all. Run whatever you want on your hardware.

      Do I get refund? I was forced to buy Windows with laptop.

      it's going to remind you regularly to upgrade to the current version.

      remind is fine. Who will pay bill for 5GB of GPRS data? Can I send it to Microsoft?

    57. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Thanks OP for the KB number to remove the nags.

    58. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Hearing these conspiracies is like listening to right wing nuts go on about how everybody is eventually going to be driven into a FEMA camp.

      And as to $0.99 to change your theme color? Well, I guess that's not paranoid since that happened in 1996 with "Windows 95 Plus!" which mostly just added theme colors for a few bucks. So nothing new there. But "Want to install a third party browser?" 1. They would get sued out of existence. 2. only if the third party browser charged a price in the store which none do on any other platform. You don't see chrome on charging money so no it won't cost anything.

    59. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honda's been sending me "upgrade notifications" in the mail for a few years now...

    60. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EULA says you cant sue. It limits you to arbitration with a small amount recoverable damages even if it is successful. As people are finding out with stolen identities, damages are almost impossible to prove.

    61. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by tepples · · Score: 1

      The Supreme Court of the United States upheld binding arbitration clauses in CompuCredit v. Greenwood and DirecTV v. Imburgia.

    62. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Any flavor of Linux gives you that option...usually not very difficult to find (and it doesn't automagically turn itself back on "just cuz!")

    63. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EULA violates the law, therefore it is invalid.

    64. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the PS4 could guarantee keyboard and mouse support for all games, I would buy one right now and never touch Windows again.

    65. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You're not forced to use Windows at all. Run whatever you want on your hardware. ...but if you do run an older version of Windows - one that's going to stop being updated - it's going to remind you regularly to upgrade to the current version.

      But that's not what it's doing. It's trying to force only people who use 7 or 8. Not even Vista.

      If it did what you said, it would be nagging XP, NT, 98 & other users. But they can't, since they require at least 1GB of RAM to run, whereas XP, for instance, required 256MB. So they can't have Windows 10 replace older versions of Windows

    66. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I agree. I installed Classic Shell on my other laptop that has Windows 10, and made it look like Windows 7.

    67. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your computer being your own property is a pretty novel concept these days.

    68. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your P0rn collection far exceeds 6GB.

    69. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were those EULA (i.e. "after the fact contracts")?

      DirecTV sounds to me like something with a real contract (one defining a monthly payment even), not where you buy something and then when you get home, you find a piece of paper that says you didn't buy it anyway.

    70. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by tepples · · Score: 1

      not where you buy something and then when you get home, you find a piece of paper that says you didn't buy it anyway.

      The U.S. Supreme Court also upheld EULAs.

    71. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      No, this isn't why MS is wanting everyone to upgrade to Windows 10, even four years before Windows 7 expires support.

      They're getting into the same game as free mobile apps: collecting and selling your personal information. Windows 10 is not free; read the fine print in the agreement. You pay by giving them information on everything you do on your computer, which they sell to third parties.

      Open a file? Microsoft collects and sells.
      Visit a website? Microsoft collects and sells.
      Play a game or launch an application? Microsoft collects and sells.

      Everything you do on Windows 10 is collected and sold to third parties to boost MS revenue stream. If you need proof, start dumping network packets going to MS servers as you click around your desktop.

    72. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try using OSX then. It will sometimes nag you about upgrading iTunes, but the last 3 OS updates did not even download until I went into the App Store application and told them to.

      They do sometime artificially restrict what apps can run on older systems, but getting around that doesn't require more than editing a text file.

    73. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      People would need a decent alternative to say "that's too much". For much of what people do on computers, neither Mac OSX (which is also not available on low-end computers) nor Linux will do. Lots of people are stuck on Windows, because it's what runs the software they have. Perhaps they could run it under Parallels or WINE, but that's not likely to be a supported configuration.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    74. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      However, some versions include malware, like this stupid popup that appears fairly frequently now and forces me to deal with it. It seems to have something to do with Windows 10.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    75. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      And no version of a Microsoft OS has stopped malware

      What does that even mean? MS has thousands of security patches to avoid holes from being exploited for Trojan, malware and adware purposes. Same goes for iOS and Linux.

      BTW, malware can be obtained outside of ads in case you didn't know.

    76. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      It's not malware. Go read up on the definition of malware. You're are miss using the word. I would probably accept adware but malware is a completely different creature. It's ok for you to hate some company or a product but you should at bare minimum remain objective and use facts instead of whatever BS comes to mind.

    77. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by DedTV · · Score: 1

      Wooosh!!

    78. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Supposedly Microsoft's free upgrade offer is only good for a year anyway. So sometime this year, it should stop nagging you.

    79. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It interrupts what I'm doing and covers a lot of the screen until I tell it to go away. Adware is something that puts ads into my workflow without greatly disrupting it. Malware is my computer causing me problems. It includes trying to trick me into clicking somewhere to install software against my will. In what way does it fail the malware definition?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    80. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's awesome? Reading what a person said before replying.

      He didn't say no other OS lets you turn off updates, he said no other OS lets you turn off updates and then ignores the setting.

      Failure at reading comprehension is not "insightful" slashdot.

    81. Re:Why would anyone tolerate this bullshit!? by allo · · Score: 1

      They would install it without your consent, if they didn't know about the amount of lawsuits when it breaks anything. So they annoy you and hope you break the things yourself, if anything breaks.

  5. Media Center by sanosuke001 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a Home Theater with a CableCARD and NEED Windows Media Center for it to work. They removed Media Center from Windows 10. If they add it back in I'd be glad to upgrade. Otherwise, they give me no other option and they can go cry in the corner.

    --
    -SaNo
    1. Re:Media Center by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Loved my Media Center. Ran it for the entire life of the product.

      I surrendered this last year, moved to Plex and Sonarr, mostly spurred by the XB1 not being a MCE.

      Let me know if you want to double down and buy my cable card tuner :)

    2. Re:Media Center by stevel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Users have found a way to install Windows Media Center on Win10. I have done this (on my mom's PC) and it works. See http://forums.mydigitallife.in...

      I'd love to upgrade to Win10 on my home's primary Win7 PC, but the upgrade keeps failing and never tells me why. I tried to get help from the MS support forums, but just kept getting fed a form response with a scattershot list of things to "try". I have Win10 on several other PCs and I like it.

    3. Re:Media Center by Amouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't have a Cable Card, but we utilize Media Center 100% for TV watching. I'm annoyed that they Netflix plug-in was depreciated, but we live with that in the browser now (and their horrid interface).

      Media Center in a wonderful program, and the TV recording in it is better than anything else I've ever had (it's simple enough that my wife can use it, that says a lot).

      With it being removed completely, upgrading on that computer is not an option. Very annoying for this pop-up to keep coming up.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:Media Center by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Plex doesn't support encryped SDV cable channels or I'd have switched long ago (aka. when I got my CableCARD and already had XBMC installed I would have not installed Windows when it didn't work)

      --
      -SaNo
    5. Re:Media Center by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Why do you need Windows Media Center for the CableCard? Who would make a piece of hardware with no support for any other media software?

    6. Re:Media Center by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Users have found a way to install Windows Media Center on Win10.

      It's great that this can be done, and all well and good. But people who criticize Linux for making you figure out how to get things to work should take note. Windows is not necessarily "it just works."

    7. Re:Media Center by stevel · · Score: 1

      It's great that this can be done, and all well and good. But people who criticize Linux for making you figure out how to get things to work should take note. Windows is not necessarily "it just works."

      Microsoft removed the whole feature from the product. Enterprising users figured out how to add it back in, and without the need to go pull sources from github and build it yourself.

    8. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Home Theater with a CableCARD and NEED Windows Media Center for it to work. They removed Media Center from Windows 10. If they add it back in I'd be glad to upgrade. Otherwise, they give me no other option and they can go cry in the corner.

      I'm waiting for the Silicon Dust offering in this area... As soon as we get a Linux based replacement for Media Center that is fully blessed by the Cable Card industry to allow the recording and playback of protected content, my Windows 7 box is going to be kissed bye bye... Until then, I have to just turn off automatic updates...

    9. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need Windows Media Center for the CableCard? Who would make a piece of hardware with no support for any other media software?

      Silicon Dust - And they are working on a WMC replacement... I cannot wait.

    10. Re:Media Center by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      I get that.

      I moved to Sonarr to grab my TV. Then I moved back to a plain old cable box to watch live sports.

      The peace and sanity in my house of not being screwed every so often on a Sunday night by some PlayReady Can't Install fuckup has made me much, much, less likely to punch babies in the face in anger. ...not that Sonarr doesn't have problems, but they're less angering than drying to reset my DRM and lose shows when PlayReady completely shits the bed -- once or twice a year.

    11. Re:Media Center by captjc · · Score: 1

      Hauppage. They have one of only a few cablecard tuners that actually allow the recording of encrypted channels, because apparently Media Center is the only software that has encryption allowed by the media cartels.

      If you want to record HBO, Starz, etc. Media Center is the only game in town.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    12. Re:Media Center by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      CableCARD is encrypted, and nobody else supports it.

      Mostly nobody, at least as I understand.

    13. Re:Media Center by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Because certification of the path (so that content couldn't be copied) was really expensive and only Microsoft did it. So there are only Microsoft drivers that work.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    14. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. It will never be Year Of The Linux Desktop until they learn that people don't want to use package managers to get software they want; people want to download files hidden behind registration walls on shady pirate websites. It's 2016, Linux.

    15. Re:Media Center by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Plex doesn't support encryped SDV cable channels or I'd have switched long ago (aka. when I got my CableCARD and already had XBMC installed I would have not installed Windows when it didn't work)

      Yep. Same situation here. I'm experimenting with some other stuff, mainly the HDHomeRun DVR software. Unfortunately, most of their clients are not able to play anything but the "copy-freely" content. I've dumped most of the cable channels, but there are a few (NatGeo, which the wife watches a lot, comes to mind) that are still transmitted as DRM'd. For EVERY show. Supposedly the HDHomeRun Android client will play the DRM stuff, but the Kodi client still can't, and the Windows "View" client can't view the DVR recordings at all. So that stuff isn't ready to replace WMC yet.

      I'm hopeful that there will be some Android TV devices coming out soon that will work. So far, there are none running Marshmallow (Android 6), which is the first version that can do hardware-based MPEG2 decoding. Without that, there is no way to watch live TV or anything recorded in WMC or HDHomeRun DVR.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    16. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft removed the whole feature from the product. Enterprising users figured out how to add it back in...

      Until Microsoft forcibly removes their workaround. In Linux-land there is no such thing as removing software unless the user explicitly chooses to do so.

      ...and without the ability to go pull sources from github and build it yourself.

      FTFY

    17. Re:Media Center by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Why do you need Windows Media Center for the CableCard? Who would make a piece of hardware with no support for any other media software?

      It *works* with other software ... unless the cable company (or content providers) are transmitting channels / shows marked as either "copy once" or "copy none". These flags mean that the channel and any recording of them will ONLY play in a DRM "protected path". Microsoft's Windows "Play Ready" is the only descrambling method that will allow you to play those channels / shows or any recordings. There are some cable companies that have started adding DRM to almost ALL their channels. All the premium movie channels are protected. All the Nat Geo channels are protected. There are many more.

      I would say complain to the FCC, but in spite of their initial move to require all TV Cable providers to support CableCard everywhere, they have now even allowed that requirement to expire, and have no interest in having the TV providers play nice with their customers (like NOT requiring $25-$50 in additional "cable box rental fees" to actually be able to WATCH the TV).

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    18. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full user backup. Wipe. Full install from a Windows 10 ISO on DVD or USB. (This assumes you have already tried the non-Windows update method already.)

      Never failed to work on any OS, Windows or not.

    19. Re:Media Center by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Microsoft removed the whole feature from the product. Enterprising users figured out how to add it back in, and without the need to go pull sources from github and build it yourself.

      Funny thing is, from what i've read so far, that would actually be simpler.

    20. Re:Media Center by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This.

      Unfortunately it also proved to be quite the niche which is why they dropped support for it. The license fee was not just expensive it was borderline criminal. No software company considers it good business and Microsoft would unlikely have even broken even given their market share in the media centre market.

    21. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with a CableCARD

      Well, there's your problem.

    22. Re:Media Center by zachdms · · Score: 1

      My loose understanding is that this won't work for HBO via CableCARD, which means I for one am still dead in the water / stuck on Windows 7. I'd be happy to hear that that's solved, but until that point MS asking me to upgrade is pointless/annoying. :\

    23. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that installation survive through updates though?

      Someone on here had a story about installing the 'old' Windows games (Solitaire, that sort of thing) onto Windows 10. When the pseudo-SP1 came around, it saw them as components of 'old' Windows and deleted them from the system. Would it not do the same to this?

      Also, looking at the thread, they are currently on version 11 of the installer. Is this due to needing to create various ways of fooling the operating system into allowing it to install?

    24. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My HTPC runs Linux with XBMC, no need for that 'doze crap.

    25. Re:Media Center by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      It keeps failing because a critical driver you use is not on the win 10 list because its operates in a win 10 prohibits.

    26. Re:Media Center by indi0144 · · Score: 2

      I don't think any mildly competent user has ever said that "Windows just works", more like, "the software I need works on Windows"

    27. Re:Media Center by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      >Who would make a piece of hardware with no support for any other media software?
      The cable industry. They only produced CableCard under the direct order of the FCC, and even then deliberately made a product so bad that it was nearly unusable.

      The foot-dragging and sabotage by the cable industry is so bad, that even Wikipedia acknowledges it.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

       

    28. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technical details don't matter. Everybody is entitled to have his own reasons to not want Windows 10. One might want to run Virtual PC 2007, another hates the forced updates, third can't stand the constant privacy violations... forcing Windows 10 down the throat of people is just NOT right, and I, for one, will oppose Microsoft on this issue, even if I don't run Windows myself. Remember the old saying?

      "... Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
      Because I was not a Jew. ..."

    29. Re:Media Center by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you don't have CableCARD, MythTV can be configured to be simple enough for wife approval. We use a Roku for Netflix and it's so much better than a browser interface. And even though the new ones come with bluetooth remotes, it accepts infrared if you have a universal you can program.

      Right now, our MythTV is set up with an antenna and an HDHomerun box. All of our DVD and Blu-Ray rips are accessible with artwork/metadata. It's easy to set up a recording schedule from either a program guide or from a list of show names. And I have ours set up with games (that we own) from Atari to NES thru PS1 and DOS/Windows, all launched and exited from a universal remote on a cohesive menu system.

      I'll admit I have put a lot of time into setup, but I really like the end result. And not having Netflix on the same device is a complete non-issue.

    30. Re:Media Center by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can get a Visual C++ compiler for free from Microsoft. It has a lot of limitations, but it will compile stuff.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    31. Re:Media Center by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I moved to Sonarr to grab my TV.

      LOL! You really had me going there for a minute. Actually, several hours ... as despite the fact that I found a lot about Sonarr, there was nothing that actually introduced it with "What problem is Sonarr designed to solve?" It turns out, not much. Looks like a UI for a bunch of files you've managed to acquire through other means (usenet or bittorrent), with other interfaces on top of those, clients to interface between Sonarr and the client on top of your source, and then some "indexers", whatever options there may be for that, which I never even got to looking into.

      So ... seems to be nothing more than a pretty face on top of whatever files you've manage to store somewhere that were yanked from 3 or 4 other pieces of software and loaded into a directory. RTorrrent client? Oh, yea, it supports that! Now just add another interface on top (because Sonarr will only talk to a web-based interface on top of rtorrent), figure out how to get those communicating, and then ... I'm not really sure. Find a bunch of torrent sources for the show you want, throw them in there, and eventually, if it's populated, I guess Sonarr's "Add a series" feature will actually be able to find whatever files it want in whatever format it needs to add it to the list.

      Yea, totally perfect replacement for WMC. _

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  6. Really Perverse by bromoseltzer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the single worst thing Microsoft has ever done in my book. Basically, they are trying to gain control over every Windows PC out there. And it's not going to be optional if they have their way. Forcing you to download 5 GB of undesired files is just the beginning. Once you're locked in to Win10, all your data is theirs. They are transforming the desktop PC into a locked-down glorified cell phone.

    --
    Fiat Lux.
    1. Re:Really Perverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. They have really fucked up with this.

      I dont get it either, they were in a great position to refresh, and be the peoples os of choice and then did this shit. It is going to really hurt them, Im already considering mac os because of ms being jerks about this.

    2. Re:Really Perverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. They have really fucked up with this.

      I dont get it either, they were in a great position to refresh, and be the peoples os of choice and then did this shit. It is going to really hurt them, Im already considering mac os because of ms being jerks about this.

      Yeah, I'm sure they are really hurt

    3. Re:Really Perverse by rcase5 · · Score: 1

      This is the single worst thing Microsoft has ever done in my book.

      Yeah, although the release of Windows Me would be a close second, if not the worst. That piece of crap was pretty bad! Followed closely by Windows 8. The bottom line is they release these things because they can. Some people have no choice but to run Windows. There are a fair number of software packages that won't run on anything else. Factor in the large number of corporate customers who "live the Windows lifestyle" (Windows Server, etc.), and that means Microsoft can do pretty much whatever they want. And remember, while the computer belongs to you, the Windows Operating System belongs to Microsoft, and use of their IP means you agree to whatever they want to do.

    4. Re:Really Perverse by Threni · · Score: 1

      Everyone who's got windows updates enabled is burning through 5gigs in about half a year or so; this is not big deal. People are going to complain about every last thing that every last company does. When you get a computer and connect it to the internet there needs to be an expectation that it's going to have to keep updating itself - forever - and that this is going to use data, so if you're one of these people who've opted for a metered connection you need to take the initiative and manage it carefully. Everyone else is going to silently and conveniently get their their machine patched. As a linux user I want windows boxed patched, thanks, and if you have to pay then that's fine with me. Windows zombie botnets are getting old.

    5. Re:Really Perverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even calling it a glorified cell phone is underestimating Microsoft's appliance-led ambition. The model they have in mind is more similar to the XBOX console.

    6. Re:Really Perverse by chipschap · · Score: 1

      This is the single worst thing Microsoft has ever done in my book.

      And remember, while the computer belongs to you

      Does anyone remember the early IBM days, when the computer didn't belong to you, when IBM would only lease and not sell?

      (I better not speak to loud, Microsoft will get ideas .... )

    7. Re:Really Perverse by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >Does anyone remember the early IBM days, when the computer didn't belong to you, when IBM would only lease and not sell?

      They'd actually sell you an IBM, if you paid five years of lease up front. It was generally a much better idea to lease, though.

    8. Re:Really Perverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you're locked in to Win10, all your data is theirs. They are transforming the desktop PC into a locked-down glorified cell phone.

      Complete, hyperbolic bullshit like this is what causes you to lose all credibility.

    9. Re:Really Perverse by rcase5 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, it's not uncommon for corporations to lease their computers today. Basically everyone gets a new computer every couple of years. But that doesn't necessarily mean that you get the latest Operating System. For a while my largest client gave me a company laptop in order to log into their network. I received a number of computers over the years, and even though a computer was "certified" for the latest version of Windows, it actually contained the previous version. Corporations are very anal-retentive about the version of Operating System their personnel use.

    10. Re:Really Perverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree, it's badness.

      We're all nerds here. Up until now I've been willing to tolerate MS on some PCs (at home) cause that's what wifey was used to - albeit with LibreOffice, etc. It always left a bad taste in my mouth.

      Windows 10 is a great incentive for her to switch over to Linux. (Yay!)

    11. Re:Really Perverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the single worst thing Microsoft has ever done in my book.

      You mean, it's the latest thing Microsoft has done. Because with regard to user control over their computers, it has been a steady road downward, so pretty much everything they do in that category will be the single worst thing they have done at that time. I mean, plug'n'play was a nice idea until it was replaced by plug'n'reregister-if-you're-lucky. And the EULAs were an steady decline from Win95 on.

    12. Re:Really Perverse by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, Windows ME? Windows ME didn't spy on you. About the worst you can say is that it crashed a lot on most systems, and maybe that it was a bit dumbed down compared to Windows 98. However, it was a dead end, everyone knew it, so people just stuck with Windows 98 and waited for XP to come out. Windows 10? Well, that's the future of Windows. Don't like it? Well, you can stick with Windows 7 for now, but unless Microsoft does an about face on it, at some point you'll either have to accept it an upgrade or move off of Windows.

  7. The Art of Seduction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sometimes what turns one person on, turns others off...

    Dear Microsoft: I think we should break up.

  8. Also unblocks the update by pavon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I uninstalled update KB3035583 and blocked it when MS first sent it out several months ago. Then when I installed the last batch of patches in December it installed KB3035583 anyway. Before Windows 10 was released I was looking forward to it as Windows 8 done right. I was a little concerned about the rolling release approach, but was cautiously optimistic. But given their heavy handed approach on forcing windows 10 on people, and all the spyware included in it, they have destroyed any goodwill and trust they built up in recent years. Trust they need if they expect people to buy into their new software-as-a-service approach. My wife's next laptop will be running Linux or Mac OS X, which is not a big deal as she has used both in the past.

    1. Re:Also unblocks the update by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      My wife's next laptop will be running Linux or Mac OS X, which is not a big deal as she has used both in the past.

      I was playing with Linux (and KDE) last night on my laptop. I'm currently looking through the various desktops to see which one fits my needs.

    2. Re:Also unblocks the update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I uninstalled update KB3035583 and blocked it

      You only blocked one of them.
      There are at least two updates called KB3035583, maybe more now.
      They have the same name, but are actually different updates.

    3. Re:Also unblocks the update by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      they have destroyed any goodwill and trust they built up in recent years.

      What "goodwill" and "trust" have they built up in recent years? Somehow a newly bought (about a year ago) laptop crashes hard during installation off Win7 disk. This has to be at least semi-intentional.

      if they expect people to buy into their new software-as-a-service approach

      Hopefully that will severely damage Office (one can dream). This idea of having cloud-based office documents and paying an annual subscription fee for the honor is not so great for the users. And they are pushing that hard too.

    4. Re:Also unblocks the update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any windows patch that gets changed after release and uses the same kb id will do this, it's not isolated to gwx or telemetry.

    5. Re:Also unblocks the update by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Got my wife a cheap refurbished Chromebook. She much prefers it over having to deal with MS bs all the time.

    6. Re:Also unblocks the update by bored · · Score: 1

      Before Windows 10 was released I was looking forward to it as Windows 8 done right

      Me to, its definitely a step in the right direction for desktop users, but its worse on tablets. I think MS totally has the right idea with the "tablet mode" setting in the charms bar. Its implementation though is 1/2 baked.

      The problem is that a whole host of things now suck for tablets. Take the replacement of IE with edge. Edge may be a great web browser for speed/standards etc, but it sucks to use because it lacks an ad blocker. The desktop version of IE had been stupefied so it doesn't understand running as a modern app anymore.

      Then there is the fact that modern and desktop apps get mixed, and a desktop app running maximized (a great idea) fails to pull up the keyboard for entry most of the time. So your forced to disable tablet mode to access the manual keyboard icon.

      I could write a 10k word article about all the good ideas with shitty implementations in windows, but whats the point.

      Frankly, I'm not sure what the advantage 8/10 have over 7 for desktop users, nor the advantage 10 has over 8 for tablet users. 10 is a bunch of half baked crap, maybe 11 will be better.

  9. Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by kosmosik · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try GWX Control Panel to disable GWX and OS updates entirely:
    http://ultimateoutsider.com/do...

    Also Spybot Anti-Beacon which disables telemetry:
    https://www.safer-networking.o...

    It works perfectly for me on Windows 7. And yes I know that all of what it does can be done manualy but these tools do their job and work well so why bother...

    1. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Gwx]
      "DisableGwx"=dword:00000001

      Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\WindowsUpdate\OSUpgrade]
      "ReservationsAllowed"=dword:0000000

      Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate]
      "DisableOSUpgrade"=dword:00000001

      Want a job done right? Do it yourself saving those as .reg files and you're done as long as you don't reinstall KB3035583 patch noted in this article's summary which does literally erase those registry entries above which nullify that patch.

    2. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by evolutionary · · Score: 1

      Nice find! Although I may also suggest moving to MacOS or Linux

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    3. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by PRMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      They turn these back on now.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Shiiiitt, so the running joke is true; Windows IS spyware!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to download Spybot Anti-Beacon but dropbox has disabled the download link due to "too much traffic".

      They should have used Mega instead...

    6. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the automated tool also remove %WinDir%\system32\GWX data? Doubt it. It takes Trusted Installer status (not even admins have it then, and you have to change the security on that folder + subfiles to do so - I suggest they add that and I am adding that to my suggestions of doing it manually also - ADVANCED SECURITY PROPERTIES, take ownership, assign full rights and delete it). You can add this right of ownership and full access ACL to any user mind you for this simple task on those to rid yourself of them (50 mb of useless clutter on your diskdrives).

    7. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by matbury · · Score: 3, Informative

      I previously tried changing registry settings and removing all traces of GWX entries and files manually. It worked but Microsoft changed them back and reinstalled GWX a few days later :(

      The latest version of GWX Control Panel can startup on boot and run in the background (appears in the system tray) and detects whenever GWX changes settings on your machine. It's been working for me on Win7 for a few weeks now but I hardly ever boot into the Windows partition any more (got dual boot). :)

      It's a short-term solution. Longer-term, I've gotta switch over completely to Linux but still need to run a few legacy Windows compatible only apps.

    8. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes I know KB3035583 puts them back in. It's why they'ren my last post: To remerge them in manually yourself minus kosmosiks automated tool I referred to. Also refer to my post on GWX folders the uninstall of KB3035583 leaves behind even AFTER UNINSTALL and what you must do to remove them http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... (In user rights and impersonation in ACL upgraded to the deleting user - one time only as the folder will be gone and so will 50 mb of diskspace uninstalling the offending KB the article refers to). I went thru all of this and tested it myself in fact, days ago. All of the above, works, which is why I suggested to kosmosik check if his automatic tool he suggested does the GWX folder removal. You can't impersonate Trusted installer typically in shortcuts afaik but you can admin and it's not considered good practice to do programmatic impersonation but rather to let a user set a shortcut for it checking off run as admin at most. Shortcut to such tools can be used but that only has "run as admin", not trusted installer to impersonate (admin's not good enough, trust me or try it yourself, and see what I mean).

    9. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone have a mirror for the Spybot Anti-Beacon installer? The Dropbox download has been Slashdotted....

    10. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Windows only programs are you using? Just curious.

    11. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Why are they using dropbox links??
      (which are disabled due to bandwidth usage)

      Anyone have any other download links one could try? (spybot publishes hashes so I can check them.)

    12. Re:Try GWX Control Panel & Spybot Anti-Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Wine. You might be pleasantly surprised. A Windows app I'm used to run works perfectly fine with Wine.

  10. Switched to fully-mannual updates last time around by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    With the way Microsoft was progressing it seemed only a matter of time before they started actually forcing users to upgrade. Looks like we're very close to that point.

  11. Come on by jwymanm · · Score: 1

    Ok, no matter what this is just frigging insane. I know for progress and what not proprietary has some better video card support and yadda yadda and I am running Windows 10 because of that.. but what the fuck. Been with Linux for 17 years and run it at work on every server I touch, as well as in vmware on my main desktop workstation, but this is making me want to inch ever so closer to full desktop Linux only. There is not a care in the world with companies about consumer opinion anymore and that means we are going to be SOL in the future if we keep choosing this path.

    1. Re:Come on by Average · · Score: 2

      Right with you there. Look, I've been a Linux user, one way or the other, for even a little longer than that (Slashdot ID checks out). I've been whatever-coexisting with Windows for the last decade or so. The period where sound and wifi were sucking on Linux (and IE ruled the web) coincided with me having enough income to buy new-out-of-box laptops. So, grew to live in a Windows desktop, Linux server peace. Actually didn't hate Win8/8.1 for my own needs (though I agree it was a UI disaster for non-power-users).

      Between the Win10 spycrap and the nag screens, though, I finally said 'fark it'. I'm back to 100% desktop Linux, 100% of the time, for the first time in over a decade. It's really, really refreshing.

    2. Re:Come on by chipschap · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is this. While there's the predictable (and justifiable) outrage on Slashdot, where's the outrage among the general public? Do they not care that Microsoft has taken over their computer? Do they not care about being spied upon?

      Or, maybe I do understand it, which would be sad ... the general public doesn't care as long as they can watch Lady Goo Goo and other so called entertainment ... sell their private data? their private lives? their souls? Who cares, the football game is on and I've got a couple of six packs!

    3. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win10 spycrap.

      Yeah, but a lot of that is hyperbolic bullshit spread by anti-Microsoft trolls. Even power-users are falling for it. Just like accredited medical doctors who also believe in Wi-Fi sickness or harbor Anti-Vaccination beliefs. Hats off to you if you can tolerate GNU/Linux, though.

  12. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

    Did you forget the sarcasm tag? (If not, no media center, background data bullshit, ads in my start menu by default, etc)

    --
    -SaNo
  13. Win10 is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can totally disclaim any responsibility for anything done with your computer because you do not have command and control of it. Everything is obviously Microsoft's doing

  14. Luckily by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 0, Troll

    I use Enterprise, which doesn't do any of this crap.

    1. Re:Luckily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First they came for Home Premium, and I did not speak out, because I was using Entreprise."

    2. Re:Luckily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I use Enterprise, which doesn't do any of this crap yet."
      TFIFY

    3. Re:Luckily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Then they came for the Klingons"

    4. Re:Luckily by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah. Unlike Joe Average User, there are several large enterprises out there with deep enough pockets and large enough fleets of lawyers to make M$ back off.

  15. GWX Control panel by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    After the first round of this nonsense, I found the GWX Control panel, which claims to disable the nagware. It also monitors Windows Update and alerts you when its settings are changed to 'install automatically'.
    I normally install updates once a week, so we'll see what happens in a few days.

  16. To upgrade or Not to Upgrade.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have run several upgrades with Windows 10, and have noticed that there are a multitude of registry entries as well as components the upgrade will break in the process. A good example of what I experienced after an upgrade was when i a fully upgrade Windows 10 Professional installation, and you attempt to change the lock screen background, and it does nothing. My recommendation is that if you are going to upgrade to Windows 10 backup your data, and do a clean install instead. this will save you a lot of headache in the long run.

    For those who use Windows 7, and do not wish to upgrade; make sure all other updates outside of KB3035583 are installed then disable Windows Updates.

  17. C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by ScooterComputer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't have a problem with Windows 10. Overall I like it, much better than 8, and clearly more "futuristic" than 7. Free is a great price.

    I am also very impressed with the "new" Microsoft under Satya Nadella. The company has done things I'd NEVER imagined they'd do, GOOD things...SMART things. Windows 10 being FREE was one of those things. There have been a few rocky issues, some high-profile like the Live One Drive storage space snafu. But overall, I've been impressed. The open source initiatives are just mind-blowing coming from Microsoft.

    But this thing RIGHT HERE... THIS has been a fucking mess. Abject "What the fuck??" failure. First of all, people have stuff to get done, and small businesses often work on cycles. This thing is happening RIGHT IN THE SMACK MIDDLE of Tax Season in the US. Any idea how rickety the software that runs tax prep is? Trust me, this stuff isn't Win7 material. There are A LOT of small, independent tax preparers in the US. A LOT. And they all use Windows. And they're all getting nagged like crazy right now. I know, I'm getting the calls. They're not the only ones. QuickBooks Pro users, CRM users, and the list goes on. They can't afford this, not now, and they're not on Windows Home...they PAID for a Pro product to support OTHER "pro" software which is more important to their income stream.

    It is bigger than that, even. Because Microsoft is nagging people running Win7 with hardware that just maybe SHOULD NOT be on Win 10. Core Duo CPUs, Intel Chipsets without driver support. And there is no opt out. No way to even say, "Hey, thanks for the offer Microsoft, but I'm just going to let this hardware which is running just fine on Win7 die with Win7." There is NO WARNING that Win10 will be incompatible with networking and wireless drivers, so that users' laptops will disconnect from the network after sleeping EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. There are NO WARNINGS that touchpads won't have similar levels of driver support, so people used to touch-tapping and driver-cobbled 2-finger dragging lose that. Nope. Nothing. And no way to simply say "This equipment just isn't ready and probably never will be...thanks, but please stop nagging me." And those aren't from little know vendors, mind you, that's from Intel! Synaptics! Broadcom!

    And worst: Microsoft is pushing this upgrade onto sometimes ancient hardware, the gross majority of which on the backs of 5-year-old 5400rpm spinning platters from the sub-terabyte generation, WHICH HAS NEVER, EVER--NOT ONCE--been backed up. Suuuure, you get that 30-day restore Window. Yeeeeeaaaaaah. Good luck with that. More spinning and intensive read/writing to sectors never tested or touched.

    So, WHAT THE FUCK, Mr. Nadella? Why? Just let users, especially Windows Pro users on older hardware, have a reprieve. Make it a year. Make it two. I don't care. But YOUR CUSTOMERS need the option to permanently stop the incessant nagging. You owe them THAT MUCH RESPECT for their business.

    --
    Scott
    "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
    1. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what's the downside for Microsoft? That those enterprise and business users miss the free upgrade and end up buying it? Oh no! Not a massive check from paying customers!!!!

    2. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a little of an overreaction? Twice a day is not that much.

      We both know that if they put in a check box to turn it off, so many people would just click "never" because they do not want to be bothered with it, but absolutely would benefit from an upgrade. In the general case they should nag about upgrading to windows 10 for the same reason that they nag about general [security] upgrades. Because their are far more idiots that will just click "never" without even reading it, than their are intelligent, informed people who would benefit from the chose.

      Please read the article. People tech savvy enough to edit the Windows Registry to avoid being nagged about an update are probably the "intelligent, informed people who would benefit from the chose [sic]". Yet Microsoft is bypassing their settings and attempting to force the upgrade on them.

    3. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that a little of an overreaction?

      No, it fucking isn't. That shit gets in the way and annoys the hell out of people who just want to keep using their computers. It's a landmine they have to avoid: One wrong click and they're basically robbed of a working computer. Let's face it, users pay people like us to remove GWX, because to them the steps which are necessary to remove the landmine from the task area and stop the nagging are completely incomprehensible. And then it comes back like a fucking zombie! No amount of CAPS and profanity is too much in a complaint about that abomination.

    4. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You work for MS don't you? identifying the target market as 'idiots' is exactly what the problem has been @ MS since the very beginning of time!

      I mean seriously 'twice a day is not much'? REALLY? That's 730 times in a year that someone has to break out of what they are doing to just tell the damn pop-up to go away! That is 730 times that a user will be muttering to themselves 'stupid fucking Windows'...and whether or not they actually equate this with MS is entirely unclear so they'll think that's the way all SW companies behave..

      Rather than 'never' how about at least 'bother me in 6 months', that at least reduces this to twice a year...if someone hasn't upgraded already they are in no hurry to do so and there are some very good privacy reasons not to do so...

    5. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twice a day is not that much? Really?

      I'd be pretty pissed if GWX nagged me even once a day. As it was, I found a way to permanently confuse its installer and make it fail to reinstall after it nagged me a couple of times a week.

      BTW, the secret is to b0rk the scheduled tasks via an incorrect de-installation from the registry. Task Scheduler will be out-of-sync with its own registry entries and the entries can't be "fixed" either through the UI or the registry. Seriously, it's clean-install time to get GWX working again for me. Huzzah!

    6. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a little of an overreaction? Twice a day is not that much.

      Maybe not...but the only other category of software that nags this much is malware, so...

      We both know that if they put in a check box to turn it off, so many people would just click "never" because they do not want to be bothered with it

      As is their right, on their hardware, to decide what software does and does not run on it. If they click 'never', it's not like the Windows 10 Media Creation Tool will cease to function. It's not like Microsoft couldn't do this in the form of a pinned start menu icon, and it's not like "Windows 10" isn't being discussed from time to time on Forbes and CNN.

      but absolutely would benefit from an upgrade.

      Maybe they would...but whether or not a given end user would benefit from an upgrade isn't for Microsoft to decide. Moreover, the GPP was referring to a number of hardware or software related cases where users *wouldn't* benefit from an upgrade, yet Microsoft doesn't treat them any different.

      In the general case they should nag about upgrading to windows 10 for the same reason that they nag about general [security] upgrades.

      The reason they nag about general security upgrades is because unpatched machines that contract malware end up infecting other machines or destroying data. Since those are not the core reasons for the Windows 10 upgrade, or the major benefits of running Windows 10, then no, it's not nearly the same thing.

      Because their are far more idiots that will just click "never" without even reading it, than their are intelligent, informed people who would benefit from the chose.

      Perhaps...but again, those same idiots will be screaming bloody murder because the start menu is different. Those same idiots will be upset because their software doesn't work (maybe not Word and IE, but there are a LOT of very important, corner-case software titles). Those same idiots will tell people like you and me to "get it back to the way it was". Those same idiots probably *shouldn't* be upgrading their OS by themselves to begin with. Having to Google "how do I upgrade to windows 10" or calling their technically inclined nephew is probably a GOOD THING for those idiots...and if not, then it's not like humanity is worse off because the technologically disinclined stick with their existing version of Windows.

    7. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Isn't that a little of an overreaction? Twice a day is not that much.

      Why don't you post your phone number so I can call you twice a day to remind you you said this.

    8. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who stands to benefit from a W10 upgrade?

      captcha: Mortify

    9. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... speaking of idiots.

    10. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, not the GP here, but I have to confirm that Microsoft are a bunch of stupid idiots. If they had any clue they would correctly assume that most of the people who persistently refuse to upgrade have very, very good reasons - known incompatibilities and confirmed problems with the upgrade process.

      Moreover, they absolutely need to get rid of the rolling upgrades without user intervention. This is insane! I have provably prevented Windows from totally bricking my machine and destroying data at least three times in the past by carefully checking for KB problems before updating.

    11. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a problem with Windows 10. Overall I like it, much better than 8, and clearly more "futuristic" than 7. Free is a great price.

      Windows 10 costs $119.99 to purchase.

    12. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So its cool if I swing by your office twice a day to talk to you about Jesus Christ? Really it should be a little less annoying than Windows 10...I promise to not pre-load several gig of files about church history even though it would probably help our discussions.

    13. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overall I like it, much better than 8, and clearly more "futuristic" than 7.

      We apparently have vastly different views of the future. Mine isn't full of ugly, hard-edged, gaudily-bright boxes, embedded ads and gratuitous spying.

      Free is a great price.

      You forgot the asterisk. Free* is not a great price when you understand the cost of that asterisk.

    14. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, same price as Windows 8's $119.99, so no change there. Since Microsoft is trying to force-upgrade everyone, they probably need this price to prevent someone from suing them for replacing their $119.99 Windows 8 OS with a lesser-valued product.

    15. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh this is hilarious...for giggles this got me to "Check for Updates" on my Win 7 machine. Windows update hasn't been working since November 2015. So it comes up with about 63 Important and 18 Optional...

      The only once checked to install of that list? Yep just the optional Windows 10 Home install. MS Morons.

    16. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, not the GP here, but I have to confirm that Microsoft are a bunch of stupid idiots. If they had any clue they would correctly assume that most of the people who persistently refuse to upgrade have very, very good reasons - known incompatibilities and confirmed problems with the upgrade process.

      No, they just don't give a **** because they think they don't have to, and that it's worth that risk to *someone else's* computer if they can force through Windows 10 onto users who don't have the appetite or knowledge to keep fighting this.

    17. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're going along reading this sentence and then POW! We got some CAPS LOCK up in your FACE!

    18. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Just let users, especially Windows Pro users on older hardware, have a reprieve. Make it a year. Make it two. I don't care. But YOUR CUSTOMERS need the option to permanently stop the incessant nagging. You owe them THAT MUCH RESPECT for their business.

      It says a lot about how far Microsoft's relentless and utterly shameless attempts to pressurise and browbeat Windows users into upgrading has distorted the debate when it seems like the reasonable thing to do on their part would be to "give" legitimate, paid Windows 7 users a "reprieve". From an update they explicitly don't want (and which might damage their computers' performance) and as if MS were the ones who had the right to force that onto people but can choose- out of the goodness of their hearts- to give these Windows 7 users a *temporary* reprieve of a year or two before they're once again forced onto Windows 10 on *their own* computers- which might not then support their hardware or programs.

      Or they might simply not *want* to use Windows 10. *That* in itself is perfectly reasonable, even if expecting MS to support it forever wouldn't be.

      Not intending this as an attack on the OP so much as on how MS's behaviour- and the increasingly ludicrous means required to get round MS's brazen attempts to spy on users and bully them into upgrading on *their own damn machines*- has become normalised in a way that would have been unacceptable even five years ago.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    19. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is NO WARNING that Win10 will be incompatible with networking and wireless drivers, so that users' laptops will disconnect from the network after sleeping EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. There are NO WARNINGS that touchpads won't have similar levels of driver support, so people used to touch-tapping and driver-cobbled 2-finger dragging lose that.

      The Windows update is clearly only meant for actual computers with a mouse and a keyboard, and not for these weird, book-like things people seem to carry around these days. /I'm-old Oh wait, one of the updates for the previous 10 build powered down my usb keyboard entirely at the login screen, so no, it is really not meant for computers with keyboards.

    20. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      The guys who understand business is retiring, and in their place are taking the idiots who make "social apps" with zero experience and even less good sense.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    21. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by indytx · · Score: 1

      This right here. Not only is it tax season, but a currently supported version of QuickBooks Pro (which you have to upgrade every 3 years to keep using their payroll service) has a pop-up notification saying it WON'T WORK WITH WINDOWS 10. If you're a small business owner, your accounting software is not a small expense, and the "free" update to Windows 10 will end up costing you all kinds of money. I'm running Windows 10 on one of my laptops, and it's installed on a receptionist's computer. It's fine, but it's just an operating system. There haven't been too many hiccups, but it hasn't changed anyone's life. It would be nice if business owners could still update for "free" when they're sure that all of the mission critical software will still work.

      --
      Make love, not reality television.
    22. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free" means that you are the product.
      If you're not paying for it, then the product is designed to gather as much data about you as it can, and sell it to whoever is willing to pay.
      That's what free means in this case.
      Choose wisely.

    23. Re:C'mon Microsoft! WTF? by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly! It's my as, and I don't want terisk it.

  18. disable windows updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All this does is make more folks switch off their automatic windows updates.

  19. MS, innovating new ways to piss off our customers by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to be a big fan of the Xbox. But then MS spent several years making one amazingly awful choice after another. They continued for years to insist that users have Xbox Gold to even watch Netflix (long after every other platform allowed it for free). They debuted the Xbox One with the promise that it wouldn't be about gaming but would instead be focused instead on a really kludgy TV overlay that no one gave a flying fuck about. They tried to force everyone buy a kinect with its creepy always-on mic. They tried to kill off used games sales. It's like they wanted to do everything they possibly could to turn every hardcore Xbox fanboy into a PS4 owner.

    Sometimes I think the leadership at MS just sits around all day thinking of new ways to fuck themselves. And not "fuck themselves" in a "Maybe I can wrap a belt around my neck and choke myself when I cum!" good kind of way. It's more of a "How can we personally insult and spit on every single customer we have?" kind of way.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  20. Eligible for upgrade? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

    Is there a way to set Windows 7 so that it's not eligible for upgrade?

    Or possibly to make it think that the hardware is incompatible with Windows 10?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apply an activation crack or join it to a domain. Either one will do the trick just fine.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    2. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Block updates.windows.com? or use a forging bootloader (eg DAZ) and a "bad" oem key?

      Also enable secure boot, generate encryption keys yourself. It works just as well at protecting you from vendors as it does in protecting vendors from you.

    3. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly the free update is only for a year... Go to Linux for a year, then come back to Windows 7.

    4. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What happens if you say 'yes' and then decline to accept the new license agreement. Does it give up with the new install, or does that leave you with a bricked PC ?

    5. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirated Windows 7 Enterprise will upgrade to Windows 10 just fine as if it was a legal copy. Just experimented this with a pirated Windows 7 on vmware (I need Windows 7 for PLC software). The whole thing upgraded to Windows 10 and now it considers it a legitimate copy. Microsoft really wants as much users on Windows 10 as possible, legal or not.

    6. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work. I've got a Windows 7 install that's been activated with DAZ Loader for years now and it's nagging the user to fucking death with those Windows 10 popups. However, several similar cracked OSs don't have the message.

      Even the Windows 8.1 install that has KMSPico on it is getting the W10 messages.

      All MSDN iso's with slipstreamed updates from March, 2015.

    7. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Love the irony of applying a crack to a legit software to prevent the forced upgrade to a free OS.

    8. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a way to set Windows 7 so that it's not eligible for upgrade?

      Or possibly to make it think that the hardware is incompatible with Windows 10?

      Make sure you have set "prompt me but do not download" as your update preference.

      Uninstall the relevant patches, then hide them so they do not reappear. -- ask Google

      Review all new patches as they become available.

    9. Re:Eligible for upgrade? by volmtech · · Score: 1

      I gave in and allowed my Win 7 system to install Win 10. After downloading some files it reported something about some incompatibility and it hasn't bugged my since. Lucky me.

  21. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    Because it spies on all your shit.

    Although admittedly they're doing their best to retroactively add that feature to the older versions people are staying on for this exact reason.

    Maybe I could find somebody who would surgically remove my lungs FOR FREE!!! but that doesn't mean it's a good idea.

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  22. The perfect virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS gets away with this because it's in the EULA. So then, just put a similar agreement, *by running this software, you agree...*, into the attack on your machine.

    There are no backdoors in Windows... no no no...

  23. Responses to this article are disturbing by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    Some people are outraged, but there's also a lot of comments to the effect of "so what" and "stop being a geezer and just update already". Thoroughly disturbing. Imagine if you told your dentist that you didn't really want your cavity fixed right now, and in response he said "Sure, no problem", proceeded to anesthetize you, do the surgery, leave you the bill, and threaten to detonate a grenade in your mouth if you disputed the bill.

    1. Re:Responses to this article are disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop being a sissy and get that cavity fixed!

  24. 'Linux by stooo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Just. Use. Linux :)

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:'Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's times like this when I'm thankful for RMS, fuck the haters. (if for nothing else than starting the conversation, or continuing it if someone else did whatev)

    2. Re:'Linux by mattventura · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, Poettering and friends are doing their best to turn Linux into Windows.

    3. Re:'Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just. Use. Linux :)

      Don't forget to pay your $699 licensing fees you cock-smoking teabagger!

  25. What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focus" by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How many times does a Microsoft customer have to tell Microsoft that the Windows 10 "upgrade" is not wanted?

    .
    How many times does a Microsoft customer have to actively stop Microsoft from hijacking the PC for its own nefarious purposes?

    At this point, I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft is no longer just asking if its customers want Windows 10. I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft is trying to trick its customers into installing Windows 10 via a never ending string of pop-up questions and misleading dialog boxes.

    I've also come to the conclusion that I no longer want to do business with a company that treats its customs in this manner.

  26. Win 7/8 users can block the bad updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a script here but I do it more or less manually:

    "Script for Win 7/8 to block all telemetry updates and Windows 10 upgrade components"
    https://voat.co/v/technology/comments/459263

    1. Re:Win 7/8 users can block the bad updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to mention, there are actually two updates (maybe three now?) called KB3035583, so just keep blocking them and it will stop.

    2. Re:Win 7/8 users can block the bad updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it will stop
      It will never stop.

  27. Even-Numbered Windows Version by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that all even-numbered Windows versions are rubbish. I was toying with the idea of installing Windows 10, on the basis that it is in reality Windows 9. But now I understand clearly the reason Microsoft skipped 9 and went straight to 10. I shall now resist the install to the utmost.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Actually, if they kept the numbering, wouldn't Windows 10 actually be Windows 6.4?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      So, then Windows 10 would be rubbish.

      Of course, the last good version of Windows, by your definition, would have been Windows 2000 - XP. And before that, Windows 3.0 - 3.51

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 2

      A lot of old software would differentiate if it was running on a Windows 95 or Windows 98 system by checking if the OS Name string began with "Windows 9". Microsoft jumped from Windows 8 to Windows 10 to avoid creating problems if someone tried to run one of these apps on a Windows 9 system.

    3. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      No, the version string has "NT" for a reason.

      Windows 95 was obviously Windows 4, Windows 98 was Windows 5, and Windows ME was Windows 6.
      Windows NT was NT 4, then Windows 2000 was NT 5.

      At this point, we had Windows ME, the latest and worst version of the old DOS -> Windows lineage, and we had Windows 2000 as NT 5, the last and final version of the server-only NT stuff.

      Microsoft then essentially merged the two lines in 2001. This was Windows XP, and it's 5.1 internally- basically they added support for the old Windows->DOS line. This got everyone on an NT version finally.

      Windows Vista was Windows 6, Windows 7 was Windows 7 (the NT version falls out of sync here), Windows 8 was Windows 8, and Windows 10 is Windows 9.

      The "avoid even windows versions" generally remains good. The old path, 3.X (good), 95 (shady), 98 (good), ME (terrible) had it as a nice rule of thumb, and the new stuff starting with XP (good), Vista (crappy), 7 (the best Windows to date), 8 (awful)...

      So we were all expecting 10 to be good. And if it wasn't some botnet keylogger bullshit, maybe it would be. But it's good they gave it an even number so we know to duck.

    4. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 95 was obviously Windows 4, Windows 98 was Windows 5, and Windows ME was Windows 6.

      If you look at the internal version numbers, Windows 95 was indeed Windows 4; Windows 98, however, was Windows 4.1, and Windows ME was Windows 4.9.

    5. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the official explanation. But we all know that what really happened was that the UX people presented their new GUI to the QA people, some shouting was heard through the walls.

      "You call this Windows 9? This is not an odd numbered release, it is utter crap. Call It Vista Plus. Call it Windows 8.2. Heck, call it Windows 10, but you don't call it Windows 9".

    6. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by omnichad · · Score: 1

      But Windows 8.1 comes between Windows 8 and Windows 10. On the other hand Windows 8.1 Update came between those. They're trying to confuse even/odd to the ends of the earth.

      There's nothing wrong with Windows 10 at all other than the forced update. And that alone is what's going to keep IT/intelligent people recommending against it. It's approach to a start menu is much better for desktop than what 8 or 8.1 had, but you can still switch to tablet mode if you like it.

      OK - it also still has a split legacy/modern control panel that I thought they'd have solved by now.

    7. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Since when? The only even-numbered versions I can think of are:
      Windows 2.0
      Windows 98
      Windows NT 4
      Windows 2000
      Windows 8
      Windows 10

      Yeah, Windows 2.0 and 8 are kind of rubbish, but 98 and NT 4 are pretty well regarded and Windows 2000 would be one of Microsoft's greatest hits.

    8. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrhh the Willennium bug strikes again!

    9. Re:Even-Numbered Windows Version by xlsior · · Score: 1

      A lot of old software would differentiate if it was running on a Windows 95 or Windows 98 system by checking if the OS Name string began with "Windows 9". Microsoft jumped from Windows 8 to Windows 10 to avoid creating problems if someone tried to run one of these apps on a Windows 9 system.

      Plus they could probably forsee the never-ending deluge of "Windows NEIN!" plastered all over the internet.

  28. ok we get it, you're the captain now. by nimbius · · Score: 0

    Not since Shiah LeBouf barking "DO IT!" at the top of his lungs has such a relentless campaign been launched to drag windows users kicking and screaming into Microsoft Windows 10 appstore talking start bar moneytrain edition. As a member of the system administration community, allow me to expound upon the very many upgrade paths users should consider.

    Embedded: expect 32,768 unacknowleded and largely invisible notification windows for that CNC lathe or medical diagnostic machine to suddenly disappear. Once your ephemeral and wholly unverifiable upgrade is complete, the vendor will notify you of your lapsed contract, and you will have either declared chapter 11 for a manufacturing facility, or botched a heart transplant.
    laptop: a crescendo of fan noise and flashing lights will be followed by an undulating windows icon for the remainder of the physical life of the machine. Use this undulating logo as a night light on your way to the toilet, or keep it around for the cat to play with.
    desktop: unfortunately due to an oversight in the upgrade process, the system erroneously prompts you to upgrade to Windows 10. You should disregard this notice and instead, upgrade to a distribution of Linux.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:ok we get it, you're the captain now. by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      You know... you could simply not assign a gateway IP on the embedded (critical) systems or block them from reaching the Internet... like a sane person would do.

      I know of many CNC machines that still run on Windows 3.0/DOS... but you don't connect those to the Internet.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  29. Vandalize by ravenswood1000 · · Score: 1

    So now Microsoft is stooping to vandalizing consumer electronics?

    1. Re:Vandalize by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Oh, really good point. Has someone notified the authorities?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  30. The answer is simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number of people who will upgrade, in response to the nagging, is greater than the number of people who will abandon Microsoft in response to the nagging.

    Or at least, so Microsoft believes. And maybe they are right. But all they care about is maximizing their profits. They do not care about harming some of their customers (which this will do), so long as such harm doesn't hit their profits harder than the gain from the push.

    Microsoft doesn't care in the slightest if every customer hates them with a passion. They only care about whether or not they can make money. Making money off teeming masses of enraged users is perfectly fine with them...because they are making money.

    1. Re:The answer is simple. by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      The number of people who will upgrade, in response to the nagging, is greater than the number of people who will abandon Microsoft in response to the nagging.

      Either way it is a win/win for MS. They either get the user upgraded to a system that they want people to be on, or the user moves to a different OS.

      MS doesn't want to be on a desktop where it is not wanted.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:The answer is simple. by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't care in the slightest if every customer hates them with a passion. They only care about whether or not they can make money. Making money off teeming masses of enraged users is perfectly fine with them...because they are making money.

      This. So much this.

  31. Mixed feelings by lazarus2004 · · Score: 1

    After using Windows 10 on my work computer for a few months I was pretty happy with it - it seemed like the worst parts of 8 had been fixed and many UI improvements were made - multiple desktops, a taskbar that is duplicated on additional monitors etc. I was planning on updating my home computer with 10, but held off, so it's still running 8.1 which I finally have mostly gotten used to. Strangely, I haven't been bothered at all to upgrade to 10 on my home computer, though both of my wife's computers are telling her to upgrade from 7. If MS is forcing a 6GB download in the background, that might explain the odd slow speeds I have seen occasionally, and it's definitely a bad move by MS, but I'd say that the alternative is Linux, or live with the nags. Still better than apple!

    1. Re:Mixed feelings by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      After using Windows 10 on my work computer for a few months I was pretty happy with it - it seemed like the worst parts of 8 had been fixed and many UI improvements were made - multiple desktops, a taskbar that is duplicated on additional monitors etc. I was planning on updating my home computer with 10, but held off, so it's still running 8.1 which I finally have mostly gotten used to. Strangely, I haven't been bothered at all to upgrade to 10 on my home computer, though both of my wife's computers are telling her to upgrade from 7. If MS is forcing a 6GB download in the background, that might explain the odd slow speeds I have seen occasionally, and it's definitely a bad move by MS, but I'd say that the alternative is Linux, or live with the nags. Still better than apple!

      So I'm just curious, what would Microsoft have to do for you to say "That crossed the line, that's too much"? Because routing around your manual settings to avoid being forced an update and then attempting to force a 6 GB update on you apparently isn't it.

    2. Re:Mixed feelings by lazarus2004 · · Score: 1

      Honestly? I don't know. I'd be pretty pissed about the 6GB forced download if I knew about it and could see it happening, but I don't think it is on my PC. I have changed no registry settings, and my computer does run automatic updates. It does piss me off when it reboots without my permission occasionally to install updates, but not enough to get me to try to live with a Linux desktop. I am fluent in Linux. I can do just about anything on Linux that I can on Windows. But my home computer is a gaming rig, and for gaming, Linux just isn't there yet. I'm not too worried about any data Microsoft can harvest from my PC, as all it will let them know is that I buy humble bundles and haven't even played something like 75% of the titles I have purchased. I'll see if I can spot the download on my or my wife's PC when I get home, but like I said, I haven't been nagged or even suggested on my home PC to update to 10, and I think that is pretty interesting in and of itself.

    3. Re:Mixed feelings by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      In other words, "I don't care if I'm being spied on, I have nothing to hide." And also, "I don't care if the computer I paid for is forcefully seized from my control."

    4. Re:Mixed feelings by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      My guess is that it will use BITS to download in the background.

      You can find this out using the BITSAdmin tool

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    5. Re:Mixed feelings by lazarus2004 · · Score: 1

      In other words, "I don't care if I'm being spied on, I have nothing to hide." And also, "I don't care if the computer I paid for is forcefully seized from my control."

      I could easily install Linux and remove those problems, at the cost of lesser enjoyment of the programs I want - if Nvidia and AMD would make decent drivers for Linux, and game developers would support Linux (across the board!), then it would make me switch. Conversely, if MS decides to pull something like Apple's app store (I know, I know it's already there!) so that you cannot even install software not received through the store, THAT would be a final straw. The way I see it, I have a choice - an informed choice. I can use Windows and know that my personal data is being mined to target me for ads or who knows what else, the same way Google, Facebook etc. etc. do, and as a result, not have to worry about whether or not the new game I want to play will work, or I can be free of MS's data collection, take steps to prevent Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. etc. from getting any data about me, and pray that the available graphics card drivers will be good enough and Wine or whatever you have to work with now will work. I choose the former, and as a result I can spend that much more time enjoying my PC, instead of searching for workarounds and fixes. MS is evil for data mining? Sure, but by the exact same token, so are Google, Facebook and all the other companies who target advertising. I know Safeway is able to track what I buy when I use my club card, but the discount is worth it to me. I recently was browsing for certification training and now I get ads on just about every site pointing me to the trainer for the cert I was looking to pick up. Same deal with Windows, the "discount" of having less administrative work involved in performing the tasks I want to do is worth the nagging updates and data mining. The real point I was interested in, however is that I have done none of the above-mentioned registry edits to remove the nagging. I have, in fact, seen no nagging on my home PC to update to Windows 10 at all - so as you can see that makes it pretty hard for me to voice an opinion that they are hijacking my computer for their nefarious purposes. I have been debating whether or not to update it based on the fact that there are one or two games which I have been told do not work on Windows 10 and the headache of checking that all the settings of applications I use aren't going to be wiped out.

    6. Re:Mixed feelings by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Funny how in every post about MS theres always that guy pushing you to Linux without even knowing the work you do, the software or the reliability you need in the system. Like we don't know any better and we need their condescending illumination.

      Thats, if anything, is the thing that crossed the line and stopped me from trying Linux on the desktop, I don't care about the philosophical values of the rock, I need it to smash shit. I use Linux it where it works, in the server.

      And no I'm not on or planning to upgrade to 10, I have 7 and I'm writing this on a Macbook. I wish I could be a fan of any IT company, all suck equally IMO.

  32. I'm OK by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    Disabled auto-updates and uninstalled the Win10 ones months ago. My system isn't nagging me about Windows 10.

  33. All this hassle... by Voyaging_Mind · · Score: 0

    Sure MS would endorse the registry "fix" as they could've, and have, easily circumvent it. I never have bothered to remove the KB update, just booted from a Linux LiveCD and changed the name of the GWX executable so it never runs. Problem solved.

  34. Updates are and have been OFF by Gim+Tom · · Score: 2

    And people wonder why I turned off updates earlier last year. When (or if) I decide to check I will research each one before applying. Windows 7 is my last Microsoft OS and I will just give up anything I use that does not have a native Linux version or runs under WINE. My response in summary is not only NO, but HELL NO.

  35. I Will Call Microsoft Technical Support About It by DWDuck · · Score: 1

    I need help turning off the update and won't settle for anything else. They will help me or hang up on me. Who's with me?

  36. Possible actions to take re "possessed" OS by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    Folks, in my experience with M$ Window$ they have become aggressive to collecting data without our permissions to unacceptable levels. For those are hard core gamers and are not preprepared make MS feels their error by no longer using their "possessed" OS do the following: 1. Disable the "Windows Update" Service in services. This is the ONLY way stop MS windows from pushing their stuff on your computer without your permissions. If you need to install updates on Windows 7 research them before you install them. Otherwise you are better off installing a 3rd party firewall and an updated antivirus/maleware software. yes, there have been vunlerabilities found in antivirus/maleware products, and some spyware is whitelisted but it's better than an OS installing what is basically spyware or worse, updating components to the point you cannot remove the spyware. 2. Install a 3rd Party firewall. (not rely on Ms Windows firewall: if you can't trust the updates, how you can you trust their firewall). PrivacyFirewall has done well for me. You can uninstall the updates. I read that Windows 10 won't even describe what their updates do any more except to say "new features & enhancements"; creepy!. Haven't we all had enough? Of course the best thing to do is to use either Linux (Linux Mint is the most user friendly so far, but I also like Debian or Scientific Linux). Unless you are a gamer, or doing insanely complex spreadsheet tables, there is nothing on MS Windows you cannot do in Linux. Professional quality Word Processor: Free, LibreOffice 5.0 works very well. Email client: Most of use use Thunderbird anyway. Browsers: We all tend to use Chrome or Firefox anyway (I highly recommend the new Vivaldi browser, FAST!!). Multimedia for DVD/CD: Free VLC. AND....not region encoding enforcement and you can make backup copies (own the media, please I'm not endorsing piracy). So you can play your disks from the UK with nothing in your way. And...so spyware trying to install itself. I have noticed the CentOS update model is a little vague at time but you can check it or disable it. The need for Linux Antivirus is less (like mac) but there are viruses out there. F-Secure, ESet and Codomo has antivirus products for Linux. Oh, Itunes...humph.... RhythmBox does the job better in my opinion. Oh, there are WAY more games (including AAA games) for linux now, just not as many, but if more people switch that too will change. Yes you can also go to Apple. (although I suspect they will play their own games with collecting user data eventually) Anyway, point is, the only way MS is going to stop this is if we stop using them. The WGA was a test to see if we'd "take it up the butt" and most people did, so they want "full throttle". I'm kind of allergic of an OS that hijacks itself.So...vote with your minds, your hearts and your dollars. Otherwise things will get worse in this are, not better. I've had young kids from my classes use Linux Minx and they didn't even blink. One kid told me she was way happier with it because it was stable and faster. So usability is no longer holding people back from Linux (x-windows+ manager installed anyway). We have options, let's use them!

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Possible actions to take re "possessed" OS by evolutionary · · Score: 1

      Oh, a few typos, sorry. (Was in a rush..dumb..Linux does not install spyware unlike MS windows. ("so" instead of "no" and "went full throttle" not "want full throttle"..opps). Anyway, you get the idea. Hope it helps some of you out there wondering what to do who may think MS rules cyberspace.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    2. Re:Possible actions to take re "possessed" OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your screed hurts my eyes, learn how to divide your writings into paragraphs in the future.

  37. Antitrust? Class action? by phorm · · Score: 1

    So where the F*** is the anti-trust or class-action class on this. I personally know at least three people whom a Windows 10 installation has boned the computer of. At least one of those was an I'm-going-to-install-without-asking-you upgrade, and they all fail in their own unique and not-so-fun ways
    * Broken hardware drivers/support, USB won't work, etc
    * Corrupted software repository (can't uninstall, needed fresh install of Win7)
    * Ate the bootloader, blowing up both Windows AND the Linux install on another partition
    * Didn't complete install, wouldn't roll back.

  38. Damn Tedious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I want to add is that reading about every new feat of those MicroBastards is getting really tedious. Fuck Em. I just used Windows because of inertia and little handy programs that run mainly on Windows, but have one ARM Linux netbook and will use Linux as main OS from now on.

  39. This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not a Microsoft fan, far from it. But I am a Windows user, for the simple reason that the software I need to use runs on Windows. (Or in some cases, runs best on Windows). There are probably alternatives I could use (open source packages that do similar things, or Windows apps on WINE) but frankly, it's too much trouble. I'm not a zealot. I just want to get my work done.

    But after a disastrous stab at Windows 8 (fought with it for three weeks, ended up reloading 7) I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft has lost the ability to write an operating system. I have no intention to ever go to 10.

    I thought I had a few years before 7 expires, giving Microsoft time to maybe come to their senses, but now I'm getting plagued with these "upgrade to 10! It's fun!) popups and have heard rumors of some machines just upgrading themselves without a decision made by the user.

    And I'm done.

    I brought up Mint on a laptop I take into the field (I'm a photographer and make extensive use of the Adobe suite) and after fixing the inevitable wifi and other sundry problems that Linux never seems to be able to get right out of the box, had a machine that ran surprisingly fast, and was surprisingly capable. (It was my first experience with Mint. It was over the 2014 holidays, so probably 17.2. I see that 17.3 has just been released.) And then -- the acid test -- I actually got Adobe Lightroom running on Mint under Wine. Ok, I said once, in this very forum I think, that if Lightroom ever ran reasonably well on Linux, I'd drop Windows and never look back. Time to make good on that. My only remaining problem is that although the base version 5 installs and runs, the update (5.7.1) installs but does not run. I'm now experimenting with open source alternatives like lightzone (installs, but doesn't run correctly) and Darktable (no problems so far, but it's early).

    So anyway, the takeaways from all of this:

    1) Windows 8 has soured me to any new Windows OS for the immediate future.

    2) I *was* content with 7, but:

    3) Microsoft's os-so-clever nagware to upgrade to Windows 10 is getting on my nerves. And so:

    4) As a result, I finally made time to try Mint.

    5) I like Mint.

    6) I don't have a clear alternative to the apps I use regularly on Windows, but I'm a *lot* (repeat LOT) closer than I've ever been.

    7) Screw Microsoft. No, really. What the hell were they thinking.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      I should mention that, Mint boots significantly faster, is a lot snappier on the same hardware, and appears to have a much smaller memory footprint. (Test by: Install mint on existing hard drive on old laptop. Wow, that's fast. Ok, lessee.... what else can we do... swap in a solid state drive, reinstall Mint. OH MY GOD.) This was a laptop I used to take into the field, and now I think I will be using it again for that purpose.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      For work: OSX for system administration, Windows 7 for business apps running as a VM under Fusion.

      For home: Windows 10 and beyond will be my official gaming platform. I could give two-shits about any of the rest of the crap. In fact, just fork it and make it an "XBox PC OS"; all I need is core functionality for gaming.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually got Adobe Lightroom running on Mint under Wine. Ok, I said once, in this very forum I think, that if Lightroom ever ran reasonably well on Linux, I'd drop Windows and never look back. Time to make good on that. My only remaining problem is that although the base version 5 installs and runs, the update (5.7.1) installs but does not run. I'm now experimenting with open source alternatives like lightzone (installs, but doesn't run correctly) and Darktable (no problems so far, but it's early).

      Instead of using Adobe Lightroom with WINE, you might want to try Corel's Aftershot Pro 2, which has recieved nice reviews and compares OK against Lightroom. And most importantly, it runs natively on Linux. It is quite inexpensive as well.

    4. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > For home: Windows 10 and beyond will be my official gaming platform. I could give two-shits about any of the rest of the crap.

      Good point. I'm not a gamer, but I can see the logic. You use Windows for a single purpose. Your use of Windows reflects that.

      > In fact, just fork it and make it an "XBox PC OS"; all I need is core functionality for gaming.

      I thought I read somewhere that Microsoft is doing exactly that -- porting a stripped down Windows 10 to the XBOX, as part of their "windows 10 everywhere" project.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much. Will look into that.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm ok with Xbox users running Windows 10 stuff; no skin off my back. I love console gaming, but i'd prefer an open gaming platform (PC) in which I can drop in my own hardware. In fact, I'm open to the idea of going purely SteamOS. So MS either has me, or lost me, but I will not chase them.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar here. I've got around 1GB data per week available (living in a developing country) so googled for a list of the telemetry updates to uninstall, then disabled update altogether on my oldish but still powerful Win7 Thinkpad.

      Then my work situation changed such that I had a lot more leeway about the software required for my job (programming). These days I use quite a few tools that are free Open Source ("peasantware" ;-) ) and run on both WIN and NIX. The Linux production servers made the move to desktop Linux (development environment) seem somewhat more sensible.

      Although I did some basic stuff with command-line Linux on servers for many years now, I was a bit apprehensive about the desktop experience (I'm one of those types that just want to get things done so I can go home and maybe do something non-computer-related - definitely not the Linux Tinkerer type). But the Mint team went to great lengths to make things easy, and while it's obviously non-technical eye candy, the available themes do make a good impression. I especially like the speed improvement over Win7 on the same machine.

      Yes, I still have a dual-boot option for the Win7 partition. Which I've come to use less and less. MS Office and Sketchup are 2 tools I yet have to find an acceptable solution for on Linux. I only use them occasionally, but I do consider myself some sort of power user on Word, using a lot of the more obscure functions for my light desktop publishing projects, so LibreOffice doesn't really cut it. There's a lot of legacy documents that I still would need to update occasionally. And Powerpoint does have some nice themes that make a presentation look good without effort. Well, I could sit down and get Wine working (wasn't successful previously, although I have tried) but it's basically laziness keeping me from it, as I do have a workable solution for now. Let's just say my move to Linux is more evolution and less revolution :-)

    8. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been a PS and Lightroom fan for a long time. I just tried Photo Ninja. So should you. I may never tweak color and exposure again. I sure as hell don't seem to need to worry about chromatic aberration again. The out-of-the-box color is almost spot-on (slightly green for my most common shooting conditions), but if you use a ColorChecker Passport, it becomes perfect. And so easy to use the program! I continue to use PS, but might not be firing up LR very much in the future.

      The biggest downside, though? PN isn't available for LInux, so I probably won't ever get away from Windows. I don't have time to futz with wine any more. I tried. It worked, mostly. That unfortunately, isn't good enough.

    9. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the same. Wife's got a Macbook Air. I have a Mini. A PS2/3/4 for consoles (Haven't used my 360 in at least 2 years). Windows box to play PC games.

    10. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      If you need professional grade photography and color calibration why don't you consider a Mac? Yes, they are expensive but it supports colors that only Windows and MacOSX due and full Adobe support

    11. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      If you need professional grade photography and color calibration why don't you consider a Mac? Yes, they are expensive but it supports colors that only Windows and MacOSX due and full Adobe support

      I was on a G4 at one time. I switched to Windows partly because I felt Macs were overpriced, and partly because Apple and Adobe were at the time engaged in a pissing contest about, among other things, how a touchpad should operate. (In my opinion, it's not a good business plan to piss off the vendor of your signature application, but maybe Apple thought Aperture and iPhoto would take over the world? How did that work out?)

      But also, I gave up on Apple partly because I became increasingly uncomfortable with the unreasoning fanaticism of the Apple fan base. Let's face it, it got creepy. And I became less and less happy with being associated with it.

      So I built a Windows box, for a fraction of the cost of an Apple box, and have been using it ever since. There are things I don't like about it, but it's not necessary to like everything about a product.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    12. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I looked at Aftershot Pro 2 for Linux, and it seems to meet my needs. Thanks very much. I'm planning to order a copy tonight.

      I also ran across "Gimpshop", which uses the Gimp engine with a more Photoshop-compliant GUI. It's apparently so close to Photoshop in controls and terminology that most Photoshop tutorials will work with it. (Where has this been all my life??)

      Sorry, Adobe. I and others have been pleading for years for a Linux port, and we keep being told that there just isn't enough of a user base to warrant it. You had your chance.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    13. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >But after a disastrous stab at Windows 8 (fought with it for three weeks, ended up reloading 7) I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft has lost the ability to write an operating system. I have no intention to ever go to 10.

      Oddly enough, some of the most exciting developments in operating systems I've read about recently have come from Microsoft Labs. The Midori project was interesting, with some really good ideas coming out of it:
      http://joeduffyblog.com/2015/1...

      Really smart guys working on it, and they managed to pull off some really impressive feats with it.

      Microsoft killed Midori, though, so there you go.

    14. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      >But after a disastrous stab at Windows 8 (fought with it for three weeks, ended up reloading 7) I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft has lost the ability to write an operating system. I have no intention to ever go to 10.

      Oddly enough, some of the most exciting developments in operating systems I've read about recently have come from Microsoft Labs. The Midori project was interesting, with some really good ideas coming out of it:
      http://joeduffyblog.com/2015/1...

      Really smart guys working on it, and they managed to pull off some really impressive feats with it.

      Microsoft killed Midori, though, so there you go.

      Fair enough. Please allow me to rephrase. I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft has lost the ability to deliver an operating system.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    15. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only question is: what the fuck is wrong with you? I do a lot of work with Photoshop and After Effects on a daily basis as well as gaming and everything else on Windows 8.1. I have no problems at all. I don't even miss the Start Menu, which I'm willing to bet you never took the time to customize as much as I did. By all means, jump to Linux. If you actually had any extensive experience using it, you'd know that you need to be a zealot to tolerate the myriad of problems you'll encounter. Enjoy getting fucked by every kernel update.

    16. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      If you need professional grade photography and color calibration why don't you consider a Mac? Yes, they are expensive but it supports colors that only Windows and MacOSX due and full Adobe support

      I was on a G4 at one time. I switched to Windows partly because I felt Macs were overpriced, and partly because Apple and Adobe were at the time engaged in a pissing contest about, among other things, how a touchpad should operate. (In my opinion, it's not a good business plan to piss off the vendor of your signature application, but maybe Apple thought Aperture and iPhoto would take over the world? How did that work out?)

      But also, I gave up on Apple partly because I became increasingly uncomfortable with the unreasoning fanaticism of the Apple fan base. Let's face it, it got creepy. And I became less and less happy with being associated with it.

      So I built a Windows box, for a fraction of the cost of an Apple box, and have been using it ever since. There are things I don't like about it, but it's not necessary to like everything about a product.

      ... have you seen the Linux ones on slashdot :-). Even Windows has them on Neowin.net. Go check the news article about this there for some WTH moments:-)

        Shrugs shoulders. I never owned a mac so I can't talk but I am picky on color and buy premium hardware for Windows pcs like my MS Surface tablet. If I were a photographer it would be an investment. Not a status symbol.

    17. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Shrugs shoulders. I never owned a mac so I can't talk but I am picky on color and buy premium hardware for Windows pcs like my MS Surface tablet. If I were a photographer it would be an investment. Not a status symbol.

      Enh. This is a definition of "premium" which I personally don't understand. The Surface Pro (any model or generation) has modest cpu and memory for the price. Using a PC for content creation (processing photos in my case) vs content consumption, takes a more careful selection of components. Number of cores becomes important, as does the amount of supported memory and the number/speed of drive ports. Having a magnetic detachable keyboard and snazzy appearance is way WAY down on the list. As is trendy brushed aluminum and a fruit logo. A pox on both of them. I'm just trying to get work done.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    18. Re:This is driving me away from Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mint is good, but I switched over to Ubuntu Gnome after a month. Gnome3 is different, but I'm liking it as it's quick to hit a key on the keyboard and bring up all my active windows, organized by workspace.

  40. EU by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    I'd never expect any FedGov entity to stick up for US consumers about this abuse, but I'm surprised not to have read anything about the EU even looking into this (yet), but perhaps I've missed it.

  41. download 6GB of data w/o permission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is not just wasteful and rude, but outright *wrong*.

  42. Malware 10 by Microsoft by swschrad · · Score: 0

    in the state of Minnesota, it is a gross misdemeanor to install software without the owner's permission. two years in the clink and $5000.

    I do NOT want Malware 10. go away.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:Malware 10 by Microsoft by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and in TX you can shoot trespassers

    2. Re:Malware 10 by Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't own your copy of Windows. We have up that control in the EULA after XP.

    3. Re:Malware 10 by Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But thanks to the Faustian, Fascist EULA, you DID agree

  43. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Because it spies on all your shit.

    Just chuck these settings off during setup and you're good.

  44. Worse.. if you actually upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overall I like Win 10, but the updates process is a bitch. One computer is generally off unless my son needs to do work. He doesn't have an hour or more to wait while it installs updates after powering it back on, yet it always insists on doing so. Another computer stays generally on, but the last update it went blue screen on boot with a bad boot configuration which was fine before it fucked with it.. I had to download a new ISO, put it on USB, try that several times, and finally get a working boot recovery to fix it. That alone has put me off MS. I'm buying macs for the house going forward.

  45. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    False. Even with all the settings turned off, Windows 10 sends your personal information to over 100 domains. They have to be blocked from the router (Win10 bypasses its firewall and hosts file, so those don't work): https://github.com/WindowsLies...

  46. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

    It's superior to 7, 8, and 8.1 in every way that I can think of. Why do people not want a FREE upgrade?

    I've tried upgrading 3 times after Windows 10 was launched, and I reverted within a day each time.

    For one it BSODs every 20 minutes, even when just sitting there. For comparison, I've only had 2-3 BSODs with Windows 8.1 since I installed it shortly after launch, all game related.

    Secondly "apps" are a PITA because they do not follow my forced display language.

    A clean install should fix the BSOD issue, but until they sort out the apps I won't be touching Windows 10.

  47. Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this not ripe for a lawsuit? This is absolutely stupid at this point!

  48. It's not that hard to stop by P1h3r1e3d13 · · Score: 1

    Just uninstall the update and hide it.

    Of course, it will be unhidden in a month or so, but just check your updates before installing them and hide it again.

    Okay, that is actually pretty tedious, and MS are jerks for putting us through it. But it is doable.

    1. Re:It's not that hard to stop by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that no longer works. MS is even reverting manual registry edits intended to block GWX.

    2. Re:It's not that hard to stop by P1h3r1e3d13 · · Score: 1

      It's still working for me. Would you like a screenshot of my Win7 tray with no Win10 nagger?

      That's why I commented. I don't know why people are bothering with the registry to disable a program they can just not opt to install.

    3. Re:It's not that hard to stop by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You addressed the "no longer works" in your original post. They unhide it. I just replied without realizing you specifically mentioned it. So it's really no permanent fix. Especially if you want to hide/block all of the evil that is Windows 10:

      KB3035583 – pitches the free Windows 10 upgrade
      KB2952664 – is the Windows 7 nagware patch that touts the Windows 10 upgrade.
      KB2990214 – update that supports you to upgrade to a later version of Windows Win7
      KB2977759 – prepares system for upgrade to Windows 10, installs telemetry
      KB3021917 – prepares system for upgrade to Windows 10 in Windows 7 Service Pack 1
      KB3022345 – installs diagnostic/usage tracking service,
      KB3068708 – installs telemetry service, prepares system for upgrade to Windows 10
      KB3015249 – Telemetry, reports UAC prompt choices when making changes to the system
      KB3075249 – Telemetry, reports UAC prompts to Microsoft
      KB3080149 – Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry, CEIP

      Source: http://answers.microsoft.com/e...

    4. Re:It's not that hard to stop by P1h3r1e3d13 · · Score: 1

      Yep. They're jerks and this is stupid. Though hiding KB3035583 is (for now) enough to stop the nag.

  49. Really. by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

    I'm a little confused. Windows 8 users didn't upgrade at the first opportunity?

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Really. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 is a poor UI, but a decent OS. It doesn't have the keylogger in the EULA, so they really want to get you on the version with that.

  50. This is why I don't run Windows by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    I've been running Linux for nearly all of the last four years, and a majority of my computing hours since 1998, and this stuff's why. I won't let it touch baremetal anymore. Microsoft will download 6GB behind my back? I run on a connection with a 20GB monthly cap! That is completely unacceptable. I wonder when customers are going to cease handing control of their systems to something that's going to do MS marketing's bidding behind their back.

    1. Re:This is why I don't run Windows by nnull · · Score: 1

      That's great for you. But the majority of us have to rely on Microsoft Windows because the software we use only works on Windows. If all I did was web browsing or simple software programming, I'd be sitting on a linux desktop all day, but unfortunately that's not the case and some people need to get work done instead of spending a whole week trying to figure out why my wifi doesn't work. Autocad, Solidworks, Photoshop, PLC software, whatever pretty much run exclusively on Microsoft Windows. VMware is usually not a good answer to some of this software because of how piss poor the GPU drivers are in linux. The alternatives are even in a poorer state without commercial support.

      The linux/opensource community pretty much failed to grab the eyes of the professional software community, hardware developers and failed to even grab the consumer on it. And it's failing again to take advantage of the Windows 10 fiasco with a "I told you so". As much as I'd like to use a linux desktop exclusively, the reality is that, to do my work, I need Microsoft.

  51. Haven't seen these issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it just doesn't work on either Mac or Linux.
    Oh well, what the hell.

  52. Re:What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are 100% correct. While MS makes no money on the "upgrade" to Windows 10, they DO make money on your data, which Windows 10 mines, then they resell that data to 3rd parties. The OS isn't the product, YOU are!

  53. Talky Toaster by VAXcat · · Score: 2

    My PC's constant recommendations that I should install Windows 10 is starting to remind me of the Talky Toaster on Red Dwarf.

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  54. Re:Switched to fully-mannual updates last time aro by PRMan · · Score: 2

    At this point I'm expecting Microsoft Security to come to people's houses with guns...

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  55. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by taustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because the computer is ours, and not Microsofts? And that is really the only reason we need. But if you want more details:

    Because there are no hardware drivers for our cash register receipt printers for Windows 8 or 10, and no receipt printers supported by our vendor that do have drivers. It would cost us seven figures to change to a different POS system, and no other POS system is properly supported by our franchise.

    Ergo, if Windows 10 installs, we are literally out of business, with no viable options.

    We bought Windows 7 with an explicit, published promise from Microsoft that it would be supported until 2020. Now they are trying to take away nearly four years of usable life. That's fraud, plain and simple. Isn't fraud a predicate offense for RICO lawsuits? (Which, BTW, would treat any license provisions that prohibit class actions lawsuits as evidence of fraudulent intent, I suspect.)

  56. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until they decide to change or ignore them. This is the whole problem with their methods here, if they're willing to ignore your desire not to upgrade, they'll just as quickly ignore your choice not to be spied on. WHEN YOU 'ALLOW' THEM TO AUTO INSTALL SECURITY UPDATES THERE MUST BE A CERTAIN LEVEL OF TRUST THAT THE UPDATES WILL BE IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS, AND IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THIS THEN YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

    Changing those setting probably just flags you as someone to pay extra attention too.

  57. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by captjc · · Score: 1

    In the case of my Grandma, her crappy windows 7 system uses a low end onboard video card that will never be ported to Windows 10. There is no PCIe slot to install a new card, either. The updater service knows this and alerts that Win 10 can't be installed because of it. However, it doesn't stop it from flashing the notification every few hours to upgrade.

    In my case, I have a CableCard tuner that requires Media Center in order to record premium channels such as HBO. So until they bring WMC to Windows 10, no upgrade for me, either.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  58. Re:I Will Call Microsoft Technical Support About I by PRMan · · Score: 1

    They'll gladly charge you $29.95 to give you advice that doesn't work and will be routed around in less than 12 hours.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  59. Who Thinks This is a GOOD IDEA? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

    So people at Microsoft are sitting around, thinking about users everywhere and what they may be doing to keep themselves on Win 7 or 8 or 8.1, brain-storming how to get around whatever those pesky users have done to protect themselves (e.g., GWX_control_panel), and then ordering a team OS-level programmers to get it done. Perhaps this division of the corporate structure have a code name? Team Borg, perhaps? Do you get a pay hike if you're part of the spacial operation to assimilate users into the Windows 10 collective? Is this where you go to be a Big Swinging Dick at Microsoft?

    These managers and minions feel entitled to spend company time and resources thinking this kind of stuff up Reminds me of those guys at Comcast who say "they're our pipes" when they want to justify poor service, data caps, price hikes, or net non-neutrality. These people are not trolls in Mama's basement with nothing better to do... these are career suits who could be spending effort making Windows suck less. Instead, They're all Vladimir Harkonnen, scheming to fuck customers to... what? please the almighty god of Windows 10 penetration statistics?

    Power hungry fucks. Windows 10 sucks less than it did, but I, for one, do not want my PC penetrated.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  60. Presumably, it will eventually stop.... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

    MS originally said that the free upgrade to Windows 10 would be in place only for one year, and after that you'd have to pay.

    Therefore one of three things is definitely going to happen after the end of July of this year: Either 1) MS will start trying to collect money for these forced updates (After the update starts, it will not complete until you pay for it, effectively placing the "update" on par with ransomware), an option which I expect may have very unfortunate legal ramifications for Microsoft; or 2) Windows 10 will be available for free indefinitely, meaning that the so-called 'free upgrade' period that they were talking about last July was just a scam to encourage those who would fall for it to get Windows 10 for free while they could; or else 3) these messages will finally stop after the first year is up.

    1. Re:Presumably, it will eventually stop.... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      You missed the one where it will try to update you to a "subversion" of Windows 10, which will have a few arbitrary features disabled until you pay to upgrade. Then they can continue to do the same thing, but taking you to an even worse version of Windows.

      At this point, you can expect every version of Windows to be worse than before, so this goes along with that trend too.

    2. Re:Presumably, it will eventually stop.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it would be more correct to say then that at least ONE of those three things that I mentioned would happen.... What you suggest is actually a combination of both 1 and 2.

    3. Re:Presumably, it will eventually stop.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They won't do a ransomware situation, like you speak of. I doubt they will make people pay for the o/s at all, but even if they don't, a ransomware situation won't happen.

    4. Re:Presumably, it will eventually stop.... by moogaloonie · · Score: 1

      Maybe it'll be like the McRib sandwich... "You liked free Windows so much that we're bringing it back for a limited time only!"

    5. Re:Presumably, it will eventually stop.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, like, Windows 11.

  61. Obligatory meme by slapout · · Score: 0

    Glad I'm not the only one annoyed. Obligatory meme.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  62. Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 10, Its the worst virus to hit us windows 7 ultimate/pro users ever!

  63. Old news by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Hid GWX kb numbers, went to manual updates. Haven't had problems with it.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  64. Not just evil, incompetent evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has a long history of extremely incompetent management. For example, the cover of the January 16, 2013 issue of BusinessWeek magazine has a large photo of Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer (now replaced by Satya Nadella) with the headline calling him "Monkey Boy". See the BusinessWeek cover in this article: Steve Ballmer Is No Longer A Monkey Boy, Says Bloomberg BusinessWeek. The BusinessWeek cover says "No More" and "Mr.", but that doesn't take much away from the fact that the magazine called Ballmer Monkey Boy -- on its cover.

    Worst CEO in the United States: Quote from an article in Forbes Magazine about Steve Ballmer: "Without a doubt, Mr. Ballmer is the worst CEO of a large publicly traded American company today." Another quote: "The reach of his bad leadership has extended far beyond Microsoft when it comes to destroying shareholder value -- and jobs." (May 12, 2012)

    1. Re:Not just evil, incompetent evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same replier here and you're right: He forgot the simplest most effective sales point there is - give people what they want (not what they don't want). His very craftsmen in "developers, developers, developers" are working against the ad effort for the reasons noted above. He wasn't smart enough to concentrate on what MS is good at and the fundamentals of improving security. He's not a businessman. He's a guy that was given the reins of something big and got greedy and stupider than he was to begin with. Only thing saving him was his 'advisors' on financials (using tricks like net worth and market capitalization) vs actually sales generation. He was riding on the billions wave Mr. Gates made for him. Sometimes, I think they intentionally devalued MS stock to buy it up again (low price and they're showing 'gains' in buybacks too, another accounting trick) and then they will release the BEST windows yet, profiting. I refuse to believe Mr. Gates is not smart enough to do that plan. I don't refuse to believe Ballmer is a puppet that doesn't know how to run a business. Look at the results. Same with politicians as well. Look at their results.

  65. Windows update needs to have the time control come by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Windows update needs to have the time control comeback. Yes there is a kind of way that is hidden in the reg / gpo's

  66. Why should anyone trust Microsoft? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Is this a joke? Microsoft intentionally writing code to reset parameters people set to keep from being nagged into doing something they unambiguously indicated they want no part of?

    Seems clear Microsoft neither wants nor deserve my business.

  67. The "file blocks directory creation" trick by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Does the "delete the file and create a directory in its place, or vice-versa" trick work to prevent the Windows 10 Update package from successfully downloading?

    I haven't tried it myself. Yet.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  68. Recognize and don't accept abuse. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    People on Slashdot don't react appropriately negatively when they are abused. That amazes me.

    1. Re:Recognize and don't accept abuse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who say "Just do what Microsoft says" are the abused spouses who just give in to their abuser....

  69. Windows 10 takes about 3x longer to set up than Wi by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Any more info on that?

    And you are in IT and use windows software raid?

  70. What about incompatible "dummy" hardware? by BUL2294 · · Score: 2

    Stupid question, but one that should be explored... Since GWX analyzes your system to make sure you're compatible with Windows 10, does it refuse to install (or better yet, not download 5-6GB), if it finds an incompatible system? So, is there some sort of dummy driver that could be installed (that appears in Device Manager) that would cause GWX to determine that the system is incompatible? Someone with some Windows driver programming skills should be able to make that... Throw in some extra code that, if uploaded to Microsoft for analysis, would refuse to run on anything higher than Windows 8.1...

    --
    Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    1. Re:What about incompatible "dummy" hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure it matters much to Microsoft if you are compatible or not. I have a 100% incompatible Alienware laptop... (Will NEVER buy a Dell/Alienware again.) Windows 10 update notification came up and informed me it was available. I asked it to check compatability and it took me to a web page informing me that it had not yet determined if I was compatible, but since I had so much memory, a fast CPU and a graphics card with 2Gig memory (which can not be upgraded past drivers like 7.5XX or something 5+ years old... so no DirectX 11), I should be fine and oh, we already downloaded it for you go ahead and install.

      Installed GWX. It informs me it changed my windows 10 upgrade settings every time I boot, so I assume windows is still trying to upgrade.

      Note: before reinstalling Windows 7 it never nagged me, so maybe it will eventually figure out it is not compatible and stop trying... but it still nags me on my kid's Athlon 2000+ and it has failed the install 3 times now. (At least it does revert back to 7 nicely after wasting 4 hours of electricity failing to upgrade.)

      I love Windows 10 on my main computers, but the nagging/wasting bandwidth on my windows 7 machines should be criminal.

  71. Windows Vista by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

    If they're going to be that aggressive with updating, then they should provide the same type of upgrades for those running older operating systems. Especially those that shelled out a premium for WIndows Vista Ultimate and turned out to get surprisingly little.

  72. There's a name for this... by dark.nebulae · · Score: 1

    It's MALWARE:

    Malware, short for malicious software, is any software used to disrupt computer operations, gather sensitive information, gain access to private computer systems, or display unwanted advertising. Malware is defined by its malicious intent, acting against the requirements of the computer user, and does not include software that causes unintentional harm due to some deficiency. - Wikipedia.

    That's what this whole windows 10 upgrade thing is.

  73. Re:What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refusing to do business with Microsoft is pretty hard, as it turns out.

    That is precisely why they can get away with consumer-hostile behavior like this.

  74. not a free upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The "free" Windows 10 upgrade turns you Windows 7/8 Retail licenses into a license that is locked to the computer, so basically an OEM license.

    1. Re:not a free upgrade by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      This isn't true at all. BTW, all licenses of Windows 10 come in OEM (such as you'd find from Dell, Lenovo, etc), OEM System Builder (what used to be Retail and plain OEM you'd buy to put on computers you're selling or using), and Enterprise with sub-designations for Home, Pro, and Enterprise (OEM & System Builder OEM). Your former Retail key got converted into OEM System Builder, and has 1000 resets/activations, and can be phone activated if you decide to replace hardware or replace the machine entirely.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  75. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Can use an AGP or PCI slot for a video card or even an pci-e X1 slot

  76. Meh. by truck_soccer · · Score: 1

    I wish cortana would go away. Even after disabling it, it still shows up in the task manager whenever i press a key or move/click the mouse.

  77. Disable all updates by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    DISABLE ALL UPDATES

    The only solution is to disable all updates in Windows 7 and 8. Then, at your leisure, you can reference which kb numbers are safe to bring over, and manually choose them (a giant pain).

    But whatever, Microsoft is clearly willing to wrestle you very hard on this. It's obviously not in your best interest. People compare this to Apple, but if you tell your phone not to get an update, it fucking WON'T.

    This is overtly hostile.

    1. Re:Disable all updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next will be someone will make a independent service pack with the right upgrades for everyone (Someone did this for Windows 98SE - http://www.htasoft.com/u98sesp... ).

      And then be able to slipstream them into a install, I guess there probably some pirated versions out there that do this anyway.

  78. Only twice? by truck_soccer · · Score: 1

    I've had a handful of machines that would open that friggen nag window mere minutes after closing it, or after opening internet explorer, or running windows updates...

  79. So how would I build my own Linux laptop? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you don't want the compromise, run your own build of Linux you compiled yourself.

    In theory, I agree with you. In practice, not all computer hardware that one already owns is compatible with Linux, X11, CUPS, SANE, or other hardware-facing parts of the GNU/Linux system. One can build a desktop computer compatible with GNU/Linux by choosing all components carefully. But a lot of people need to use a laptop computer for some reason, such as making productive use of time as a transit passenger commuting to and from one's day job. As I understand it, it's impractical to build a laptop yourself if you're unsatisfied with the limited selection sold by System76.

    1. Re:So how would I build my own Linux laptop? by dakohli · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a bleeding edge laptop, then Linux will most likely work fine for you. I have an HP Elitebook which ran Windows 7 Pro, I dual booted it with Mint 17.1, It successfully upgraded the Windows to 10 without destroying the dual boot. I was impressed actually, although once I started looking at Windows 10 more closely, the less I liked it. So, when I upgraded to a SSD, Windows got dropped. Everything works out of the box.

  80. Re:What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focu by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Refusing to do business with Microsoft is pretty hard, as it turns out.

    So far, in the past few years, I've reduced the number of Windows licenses I use by 4. I've found FreeBSD to be quite useful for a lot of the server-type of things I used to do with Windows.

    .
    I migrated away from Microsoft Office eight years ago.

    Let's see, what other Microsoft software do I use? Nothing except for the the OS on the remaining Windows PCs.

    Not buying anything else from Microsoft is looking to be easy....

  81. It's high time..... by flightmaker · · Score: 1

    ....free thinking citizens of the world pulled together to put an end to this nonsense.

    Microsoft is nothing more than a money gathering machine, so the best way to attack it would be to cut off the money supply. The only legal way I can think of to attempt this is to spread knowledge of free solutions as widely as possible.

    My suggestion would be to approach some media production company, preferably one that depends upon open source because they might do it for free, and persuade them to work with a well known personality, perhaps somebody like Steven Fry (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ) who might also do it for free. Produce a short public information type film demonstrating how to use Windows to download a good Linux desktop OS and burn the ISO file to a DVD, then use that DVD to install Linux onto a computer.

    It might take a kick-starter campaign to raise funds to put it onto TV.

    Could it work?

  82. Nagging to buy new GPU or PC by tepples · · Score: 0

    Why nag me when the thing says Windows 10 won't even work?!

    It's nagging you to buy a new GPU. Microsoft gets a cut because the GPU manufacturer paid for certification. That's also why one of the options, if I remember correctly, is "Explore new PCs with Windows 10". Microsoft gets a cut of those too.

  83. Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, when's the class action/antitrust start?
    Oh yeah, you can't sue megacorps anymore.

    The only way their going to stop is when they are forced to.

  84. Steam for Linux, Steam for OS X, or consoles by tepples · · Score: 1

    Switch to GNU/Linux, and you can still play games in Steam for Linux. Buy a Mac, and you can still play games in Steam for OS X. Not all games for Windows are available for GNU/Linux or OS X, but games that aren't are also likely to be ported to PlayStation 3 or PlayStation 4.

    1. Re:Steam for Linux, Steam for OS X, or consoles by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I did this very thing back in 2010.. I had just retired from using/supporting MS products since Windows 3.11, and I decided at that time, I didn't care to use MS products any longer, and since I'd started using Linux around 1995 (Slackware), I decided ALL of my systems would be on Linux. In reality, the change was only to my Dell Precision workstation and laptop, both of which came with Windows 7 Pro from Dell, whereas my home server had been running Linux since I set it up back in 2005. Since I'm the defacto neighborhood tech-support, I still get pestered to clean up after neighbors Windows systems. I've been able to convert quite a few friends/relatives over to Linux, and have a couple more on the calendar to do, since the appearance of Windows 10 and its spyware ways. Over the holidays, I had two neighbors who bought new Intel i7 systems from CostCo come to me and ask about Linux, as they had heard what a privacy nightmare Windows 10 was. I gave them each a KUbuntu LiveCD and had them try it out. After several days both neighbors came and asked me to upgrade them... TL;DR... FUCK MS AND THEIR WINDOWS 10....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  85. Re:What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focu by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I've also come to the conclusion that I no longer want to do business with a company that treats its customs in this manner.

    Neither do I. But I would like to get four more years of extended support that I paid for without constant harassment. I figure that by then I'll finally go back to Linux (yes, I left again) and maybe a Wintendo if AAA games are still absent.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  86. CableLabs' DRM requirements by tepples · · Score: 1

    Who would make a piece of hardware with no support for any other media software?

    CableLabs, a consortium of the cable TV industry, controls which software is approved to decrypt subscription television signals. In theory, any program can be used so long as it passes a certification process that it meets CableLabs' requirements for digital restrictions management compliance and robustness. But among television recording applications for PC, the only certified application I know of is Windows Media Center.

  87. Apple doesn't do this by dfm3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple users tolerate it.

    No, we don't. Because Apple to the best of my knowledge has never overridden user-configured settings when it comes to downloading or installing automatic updates. For years now I have disabled all of the relevant "automatic update" checkboxes in System Preferences, and Apple has never reenabled them and has never downloaded system updates without my permission. I have several old iPhones with various versions of iOS 6-8 on them and apple has never applied an OS update without my permission. Okay, I do remember being asked once or twice during major OS upgrades if I wanted to enable some of the automatic update settings, and once (*once!*) got a notification popup on my Mac asking me if I wanted to download Safari, but there's a clear difference between displaying a one-time popup and downloading 6GB of data to my machine *when I specifically asked you not to*, or installing Safari anyway, or even changing settings that you *know* I set manually!

    1. Re:Apple doesn't do this by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Even though Apple never (or so far) force me to upgrade/update my device, sadly the iOS 9.2 seems to be a new annoyance to me. In the past, a pop up asking me to update/upgrade iOS version would go away if I denied it. Now, it will pop up EVERYDAY. First a pop up asks me to 1) 'Install Now' or 'Install Later'. If I select 'Install Later', it will have 3 more options asking me when I should be reminded. The longest time I can select is 'Tonight'. Everyday, the pop up will come back again, and this never happened before in previous versions!

      Speaking of changing user configuration, only certain configurations will be reset to their default set up when a device is upgraded/updated iOS. One configuration is Bluetooth. The setting will ALWAYS be turned back on after an update/upgrade. I always keep my bluetooth turned off and I have to do that every time I update/upgrade iOS...

    2. Re:Apple doesn't do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Apple does all the same things to the exact same degree. Microsoft didn't override any user specified settings (only internal hidden settings, which Apple also ignores during patches), and only downloads the update when configured do automatically download updates, which just happens to be default, just like on OS X.

    3. Re:Apple doesn't do this by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Really? Currrently, I've had a badge with a number on the Settings icon for a long time. It wants me to upgrade to 9.2, apparently, but I had one popup and a note on Settings.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Apple doesn't do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We must be using different versions of Apple software, because for a while now most dialog boxes Apple shows me don't have "Yes" and "No" buttons with a checkbox saying "Don't ask me again"; the usual set of buttons is now "Yes" and "Not now".

      After some time, the dialog will pop up again.

      I am already transitioning to XUbuntu. Both Microsoft and Apple are no longer relevant to my computing needs.

  88. can't update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I could update to Windows 10, but I have some legacy software that I need to keep Visual Studio 2005 around for. And Visual Studio 2005 supposedly has compatibility issues with Windows 8 and higher.

  89. Just hide the update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I uninstalled and then hid the update on all my Win7 systems and have not had any issues since. It's a pain to hide the update, because uninstalling it requires a reboot, and the reboot will reinstall it. So decline the reboot, then re-run the update scan and hide it. Then it will stay gone, at least it has on my systems. Reg edit not needed.

  90. Virtual Machine Useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know Windows 10 won't auto-install on a virtual Windows machine.

    Is there any registry entry that can be altered to trick windows 10 into thinking the OS is running in a virtual machine?

  91. C'mon wisnoskij! WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that a little of an overreaction? Twice a day is not that much.

    We both know that if they put in a check box to turn it off, so many people would just click "never" because they do not want to be bothered with it, but absolutely would benefit from an upgrade.

    I'm pretty sure that there are things you do not want to be bothered with, like exercising regularly in a particular gym, that you would absolutely benefit from. Should the police be dragging you there if you don't do it voluntarily?

    Could lower health care costs for everyone.

  92. Failed installer by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

    I tried to upgrade to W10 on my media center, an it failed miserably. Even the Install from disk just sends me back to Windows 7 to do the failed upgrade. Needless to say, I switched to kodibuntu.

  93. On a VM but not hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll run windows 10 on a VM that is running on a windows 7 but I don't trust windows 10 on my hardware. Too many key loggers etc... Windows 10 does things that an OS should never do

    Spy on the user.
    Take you data by force.
    Force Updated (a huge deal breaker!!!).
    Log key presses and send them to a server.
    Force the user to use cortana.
    Even if you turn it all off it still sends data!

  94. Windows is now nagware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I wouldn't mind upgrading my Win 7 Starter Edition Aspire 10 netbook to Windows 10 just to take advantage of the 4GB of RAM I put in my system (Starter is limited to 2GB). But Intel / PowerVR never created 64 bit drivers for the embedded graphics card, so I can't upgrade (at least via the normal route). So why is MS nagging me to install and downloading 6GB of data to my SSD which I'll never use?

    Anyone have any suggestions on a formal way to complain about this?

  95. Testing with Virtual Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that really drives me nuts about this whole thing is that I have Windows 7 and Windows 8 testing boxes (VM's). I DO NOT want to upgrade them, they are for testing. And yet I get these messages and secret downloads of the W10 package. Geez!

    1. Re:Testing with Virtual Machines by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      See above for which KBs to uninstall, you need to run it in an Administrator Powershell window, and don't use the "/quiet" option since I have discovered that it may cause the uninstall to silently fail.

      Also create an empty file named "$WINDOWS.~BT" in the root of your drives. It will prevent download of Windows 10 if the update still decides to go through.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Testing with Virtual Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon since I've modded this thread, but the saving grace of VMs is snapshots. Normally I'd say you shouldn't need to resort to snapshots in order to protect yourself from something that should never have been foisted on you in the first place, but they're a fact of life in virtualization for a lot more (legitimate) reasons. Snapshot your VMs when you get them setup the way you want them (or even right now, and then again when setup is done in case GWX rears its ugly head in the interim) and if you ever get the nagware and accidentally pull the trigger as it seems to love to deceive and cajole people into doing, revert to the snapshot and give it a proud one-finger salute.

  96. Re:Windows 10 takes about 3x longer to set up than by andymadigan · · Score: 1

    My home PC is not something I spend a ton of time maintaining (or I'd be using Linux). Yes, I'm using software for the mirrored RAID, mostly because I was more comfortable I'd be able to swap in a new drive with the software RAID than the hardware RAID, and the hardware RAID configuration was pretty painful. I *was* using the hardware RAID until there was an actual problem and it made it as difficult as possible to diagnose.

    The extra time from setting up Windows 10 mostly comes from disabling things. Setting the default browser takes a little longer, there are more pre-installed apps (like "Get Office" and "Get Skype") that have to be uninstalled - which requires finding them in the start menu, you can't search for them if you want to uninstall them. Even if OneDrive isn't configured it still decides to start with Windows and generate notifications, so I turn that off too (usually that gets delayed because it updates while I'm trying to disable it). Plus the trackpad notification. I also clear most of the junk out of the start menu, like Mail, Sports, Finance, and Candy Crush.

    I had Windows 8.1 down to about 30 minutes of interactive setup, Windows 10 is about 90 minutes. It would be much longer if we were buying direct from the manufacturer (more shovelware), but all of the PCs I assign out now are Microsoft Signature PCs. Of course Microsoft Signature doesn't exempt you from Microsoft's own shovelware (I really hate the 'Get Skype' app).

    --
    The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
  97. I don't understand why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...people are having repeated problems with this.

    Ever since MS started trying to force Windows 10 on unwilling users, I simply unchecked the Windows Update option that says something like "Give me recommended updates the same way I receive critical updates", and also set it to only notify me of updates and not to download or install them. KB3035583 then just sits there in the list of Recommended Updates where it is just ignored by me.

    I've never had to hide the update, so I've not had it mysteriously unhide itself, and I've never seen it move into the critical updates list and inadvertently get installed along with those.

    For me, steering clear of Windows 10 has been easy to do so far.

  98. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fear tactic anyone? Who cares, just don't run that software, period! On a side people who "know" left that train long time ago, whats left is the uniformed masses who don't care about that as long as they could watch football on 80 inch TV that every few seconds dish them daily dose of "programing"

  99. GWX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forced admin control over the GWX folder found in the system32 folder and renamed it. No more nagging. I tried to do it to the GWX.exe executable but was denied. I also tried to delete either the file or the folder but neither option was permitted.

  100. class action by Knut+K. · · Score: 1

    Do you suppose Satya Nadella would dig a class action suit?

  101. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Because you are not very smart and have overlooked a couple of important drawbacks of Win10?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  102. new policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nag them until they buy a product. Great. Microsoft is the biggest malware I have ever seen.

  103. Legal situation? by WoOS · · Score: 1

    I also wonder about the legal situation of manipulating registry entries to circumvent user decisions. There are a few laws in Germany which as if they could fit (but IANAL):
    303a Data Manipulation
    (1) Anyone who illegally deletes, supresses, renders unusable oder changes data shall be punished with imprisonment of up to 2 years or a monetary penalty

    303b Computer Sabotage
    (1) Anyone who significantly disturbs a data processing [process], which is of significant importance to someone else, by
    * an act according to 303a
    * injecting, entering or submitting data with the intention to create a disadvantage to someone else, or
    * destroying, damaging, rendering unsuable or changing a data processing system or data storage medium
    shall be punished with imprisonment of up to 3 years or a monetary penalty
    (2) In case the data processing [process] is of significant importance for a (different) business, company, or a civil administration the punishment shall be imprisonment of up to 5 years or a monetary penalty.
    (4) In especially serious cases of section (2) the punishment shall be imprisonment of no less than 6 month to 10 years. As a rule a specially serious case is if the culprit
    1)...
    2) acted businesslike or as member of a gang which formed for continuous perpetration of computer sabotage.

    And according to 202c distributing computer software which is intended to commits such crimes is punishable, too.
    [all my translation; definitely not authorative]

    So now the questions are:
    * Was the manipulation of the registry values illegal?
    * Was a company or civil authority hit? (Note that the law does not say "Void if they should have set up a Domain")
    * Is Microsoft's approach "businesslike"?
    Because if all is answered yes, then anyone involved in programming and distributing GWX.exe should better avoid Germany for some time to come (I don't know the statue of limitation on this).

  104. It's All About The Pentiums - Weird Al by Chas · · Score: 1

    It's all about the Pentiums, baby
    Uhh, uh-huh, yeah
    Uhh, uh-huh, yeah
    It's all about the Pentiums, baby
    It's all about the Pentiums, baby
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    Yeah

    What y'all wanna do?
    Wanna be hackers? Code crackers? Slackers? Wastin' time with all the chatroom yakkers? 9 to 5, chillin' at Hewlett Packard? Workin' at a desk with a dumb little placard?
    Yeah, payin' the bills with my mad programming skills. Defraggin' my hard drive for thrills.
    I got me a hundred gigabytes of RAM. I never feed trolls and I don't read spam.
    Installed a T1 line in my house. Always at my PC, double-clickin' on my mizouse.
    Upgrade my system at least twice a day. I'm strictly plug-and-play, I ain't afraid of Y2K.
    I'm down with Bill Gates, I call him "Money" for short. I phone him up at home and I make him do my tech support.
    It's all about the Pentiums, what?
    You've gotta be the dumbest newbie I've ever seen. You've got white-out all over your screen.
    You think your Commodore 64 is really neato? What kinda chip you got in there, a Dorito?
    You're usin' a 286? Don't make me laugh. Your Windows boots up in what, a day and a half?
    You could back up your whole hard drive on a floppy diskette. You're the biggest joke on the Internet.
    Your database is a disaster. You're waxin' your modem, tryin' to make it go faster.
    Hey fella, I bet you're still livin' in your parents' cellar. Downloadin' pictures of Sarah Michelle Gellar. And postin' "Me too!" like some brain-dead AOL-er. I should do the world a favor and cap you like Old Yeller. You're just about as useless as jpegs to Hellen Keller

    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)

    Now, what y'all wanna do?
    Wanna be hackers? Code crackers? Slackers
    Wastin' time with all the chatroom yakkers?
    9 to 5, chillin' at Hewlett Packard?

    Uh, uh, loggin' in now
    Wanna run wit my crew, hah? Rule cyberspace and crunch numbers like I do?
    They call me the king of the spreadsheets. Got 'em printed out on my bedsheets.
    My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks. But it was obsolete before I opened the box.
    You say you've had your desktop for over a week? Throw that junk away, man, it's an antique.
    Your laptop is a month old? Well that's great. If you could use a nice, heavy paperweight.
    My digital media is write-protected. Every file inspected, no viruses detected.
    I beta tested every operation system. Gave props to some, and others? I dissed 'em.
    While your computer's crashin', mine's multitaskin'. It does all my work without me even askin'.
    Got a flat-screen monitor forty inches wide wide. I believe that your says "Etch-A-Sketch" on the side.
    In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, "alt.total-loser".
    Your motherboard melts when you try to send a fax. Where'd you get your CPU, in a box of Cracker Jacks?
    Play me online? Well, you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll control-alt-delete you.
    What? What? What? What? What?

    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    It's all about the Pentiums! (It's all about the Pentiums, baby)
    Now, what y'all wanna do?
    Wanna be hackers? Code crackers? Slackers
    Wastin' time with all the chatroom yakkers?
    9 to 5, chillin' at Hewlett Packard?
    What??

    I basically look at this as Microsoft's major problem. Instead of building a stable ecosystem of products, they're constantly (and consistently) in "churn and burn" mode. As such, as a Good Little Consumer, you should buy the sam

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  105. Startup folder + batch file + taskkill by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

    ... which fools MS into thinking it's still nagging you as designed. It's in the startup directory (yes, Windows 8.1 still has one). I opted for this instead of uninstalling the update or changing registry values since it was the option no one else was doing. I'm not at home right now, but it's easy enough to figure out on your own.

  106. Not Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real damage will come with the small businesses that have no IT department. The psychologist office whose printers and customer service programs all get borked when the server magically upgrades. The restaurant office that can no loger use their quickbooks and almost loses their company file when the server upgrades. The pizza parlor front end and cashier program that does not work with 10. The Insurance company software that does not work. The verizon store applications that don't function with anything beyond internet explorer 8. The dentist software and camera assist programs for working on patients that no longer works because of windows 10. The software for running mill machinery that only works on 7 and won't function on 10. These are all customers that I have worked on. These are all REAL people who have REAL businesses that will unexpectedly lose hundreds, if not thousands of dollars of money for an upgrade they've already opted out on. Make no mistake folks, the scale of the damage will be huge. Microsoft is playing Russian Roulette with the market and the law and it is very likely they will blow their own brains own in front of everyone.

  107. Antivirus vendors to the rescue? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Honestly. I think that the BEST option would be for AV vendors to classify GWX is malware.
    It basically IS malware. It sets up on a system more or less without user request. It performs a lot of unauthorized tasks under the hood. It's misappropriating system resources to do this. And it actively fights user-mandated removal from your system.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Antivirus vendors to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I was literally thinking, "can't one just flag gwx.exe as malicious and let their antivirus/malware/spyware software do it's job? Why should anyone have to protect themselves from malicious intent from a product they purchased in the first place?" ...fuck Microsoft. Buncha sorry motherfuckers...

  108. Re:What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times does a Microsoft customer have to tell Microsoft that the Windows 10 "upgrade" is not wanted?

    Always. kzzzzt Uh, never!

    How many times does a Microsoft customer have to actively stop Microsoft from hijacking the PC for its own nefarious purposes?

    Always. kzzzzt Uh, never!

    At this point, I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft is no longer just asking if its customers want Windows 10. I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft is trying to trick its customers into installing Windows 10 via a never ending string of pop-up questions and misleading dialog boxes.

    Shhh. Don't even say those things! Especially not if they're true.

    I've also come to the conclusion that I no longer want to do business with a company that treats its customs in this manner.

    Does anyone?

  109. I went back to Mythbuntu, never happier by mfearby · · Score: 1

    I don't know why I got rid of Mythbuntu the last time a few years ago (installing Win 7). Windows became such a dog lately that it was easier to put ol' faithful back on the box instead. Mythbuntu is so snappy and responsive; no CPU spikes slowing down playback, and it does what you want at the time you press a button (there's a novel concept, Microsoft!). I can see why Microsoft ditched Windows Media Centre in 10 because they've proven that it's just too hard for them to get it right. My household is now completely Microsoft-free (with my main computer being a Macbook Pro :-)

    1. Re:I went back to Mythbuntu, never happier by nnull · · Score: 1

      Playback is great with mythtv, but the UI is still God damn awful. Setup is also still awful. The only reason I still stick with MythTV because it plays everything you throw at it because it uses mplayer, vlc, whatever you want. All the others have playback issues.

    2. Re:I went back to Mythbuntu, never happier by mfearby · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The setup was most definitely not a walk in the park (had to change various permissions on things and couldn't even adjust the volume by default), but after the initial day's tinkering, it's rock solid, and won't suffer the gradual rot that Windows gets.

      I had to install some Shark codecs or whatever they're called just to play MKV files on Windows and it was very buggy. If you've got the time initially, the long-term investment well and truly pays off. There are various themes but I still find the default Mythbuntu theme the best (once you go and disable fanart backgrounds, which are just distracting).

  110. Replace the downloaded files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would it be possible to just replace the downloaded files with dummy files with the right name? So when MS checked to see if they needed downloading, they would appear to be there, but not take up much space?

  111. WTF This article NOT on mobile site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know since when contents have not been same?

  112. Think like a hacker fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just promo your box to a DC. Then disable the DC services. No more updates...

  113. Nothing we say will matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...microsoft will do what it wants. Now I can understand that at work you may have to use Windows but at home you should probably only use it for games and use Linux/BSD for everything else.

  114. Re:Windows 10 takes about 3x longer to set up than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, you work in I.T. and you haven't setup a script to take care of this...

  115. Windows 10 is Broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, why are the AV developers not treating GWX as a virus - it is behaving exactly like one.

    Secondly, Windows 10 does not work work well to begin with. I have tried it on current hardware and older, and I have seen more BSODs with it than I have with any previous Windows OS.

    Third, using the proverbial Lemmings' argument to justify consumer as a product without their consent goes beyond simple privacy violations.

  116. Re:What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focu by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    How many times does a Microsoft customer have to tell Microsoft that the Windows 10 "upgrade" is not wanted?

    .

    How many times does a Microsoft customer have to actively stop Microsoft from hijacking the PC for its own nefarious purposes?

    At this point, I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft is no longer just asking if its customers want Windows 10. I've come to the conclusion that Microsoft is trying to trick its customers into installing Windows 10 via a never ending string of pop-up questions and misleading dialog boxes.

    I've also come to the conclusion that I no longer want to do business with a company that treats its customs in this manner.

    Look!! 200,000,000 installs in just 4 months?! Customers MUST LOVE IT SEE OMG

    Marketing can brainwash alot of executives

  117. This will STOP WIN10 infection by Announcer · · Score: 1

    There is an excellent 3'rd party utility that SO FAR, has successfully prevented MotherShip from forcing it's malice upon several Internet-facing WIN7 machines that are under my care. This utility is basically a watchdog to keep MS's fingers out of your Registry.

    Here is where you can find it:

    http://blog.ultimateoutsider.c...
    (I hope his server won't melt! Too bad the CORAL mirroring system is no more.)

    You're welcome. ;)

    --
    Willie...
  118. Here, protect your computers with this... by Announcer · · Score: 1

    I posted about this elsewhere in this topic, but wanted to make sure you saw it. It's a 3'rd party utility that has, so far, (knock on silicon) prevented MS from forcing their malware onto any of my Internet-facing WIN7 machines.

    http://blog.ultimateoutsider.c...

    --
    Willie...
  119. My machine(s) "ready to go, tested ok!" not so by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I'm getting nagged on my HP Microservers (N36, N40, N54L) and I know for a fact if you don't have the latest BIOS update on them, the network card doesn't work. I know someone who's done it and I've seen the "why doesn't server 2012 work on my HP Microserver" articles.

    I sure as shit hope these things don't auto install this thing.

  120. RMS was right by tarlek1234 · · Score: 1

    "If the users don't control the program, the program controls the users. With proprietary software, there is always some entity, the "owner" of the program, that controls the program—and through it, exercises power over its users. A nonfree program is a yoke, an instrument of unjust power." https://www.gnu.org/philosophy...

  121. In the meantime... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    I have had nothing but great success getting Windows software to work with Wine under Linux. I just installed Photoshop today. Granted, some apps, especially Java based (getting an app to work with JDK without replacing OpenJDK system wide), require some finagling , but it can be done. I realize we are largely talking about the corporate sector, but for those at home who are running Linux primarily and have a backup Windows machine for those apps that are Windows only...

    Hard to say if this will get modded up or down. This late in the game, probably nowhere.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  122. Install Fresh Instead! by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

    That's the tragedy of all this nagware... upgrading is not guaranteed to work and can lead to a hosed system.

    Best thing to do is mothball your old drive, get a new SSD, and install fresh. All you need is here to create a legit installable DVD or USB stick, and a license key from any of Windows 7, 8, 8.1 or 10, and you don't really even need the key because unlicensed Windows 10 doesn't do much to bitch at you except put up a water-mark on the desktop and present an alert from time to time about how great it is to have a fully legal copy. Unlicensed Windows 10 does none of that auto logout or shutdown nonesense (at least, not for now).

    If you think you have too much installed cruft on your machine to start fresh, well, all that cruft is more likely to fuck up the magic upgrade process. Catch-22. Back up your shit, find your old install media, check out ninite for installing free software and Steam or Gog for installing games. Besides, new SSDs these days are way good and affordable. Better than taking a chance at some hit-or-miss upgrade routine. Even Linux distros haven't perfected major in-place upgrades. Always safer to start over fresh, and your rig will thank you for it.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  123. No more updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've turned updates off on hundreds of computers. Their owners are happier without these nags, so they don't get updates at all. Fuck MS for giving us the choice of doom or bullshit.

    Picking doom because when they call and say the PC is dead I'm showing up with a Linux disk and nothing else.

  124. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an infoworld article, that is based on third hand information from some dude selling a "disable windows 10 updates" tool. Nowhere in the article does it even claim that anything silently redownloads 6GB, submitter seems to have added that to an already dodgy piece of clickbait.

    You guys are fucking hilearious.

    ARRRRR FUCK YOU MICROSOFT I AM SO MAD WHAT YOU DID I HAVE BEEN A COMPUTER PRO FOR MY ENTIRE LIFE AND LET ME TELL YOU

  125. Well you basically have no choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The nags finally caused me to give in. I bought a Macbook Air.

    1. Re:Well you basically have no choice by nnull · · Score: 1

      I actually wonder how many people did switch to Apple products because of Windows 10.

  126. Just give in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are going to run windows, you are going to run 10, and you will not have a choice. Eventually the nagging will get to the point they will either just disable your older install, or just upgrade you.

  127. Followed directions here: seems to work by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    After reading the first hundred or so messages in this thread I decided it was time to tackle this issue once and for all. I did this on three different machines all running Win 7. YMMV but this appears to work.

    1. Turn off auto updates
    2. Uninstall KB3035583
    3. Restart
    4. Uninstall KB3035583 again (2nd time)
    5. Restart
    6. Uninstall KB3035583 again (3rd time)
    7. Restart
    8. Check for Updates. It will show KB3035583
    9. Hide KB3035583

    I know it's a little strange, but that damned update needed to be uninstalled three times before I could get it to gone. The first time I thought I might have mis-remembered exactly what I did, but by the third machine it was a definite pattern.

    FYI

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:Followed directions here: seems to work by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I think that running processes prevents the uninstall so you need to kill them first.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  128. Re:Switched to fully-mannual updates last time aro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "At this point I'm expecting Microsoft Security to come to people's houses with guns..."

    I have guns too, They wouldn't dare to do that

  129. Yar har fiddle dee dee! by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Being a pirate is all right with me!

    no

    more

    windows

    UPDATES!

  130. Re:What has happened to Microsoft's "Customer Focu by nnull · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately a lot of business and even mission critical software now runs Microsoft products. Your choice is pretty much Apple OSX with their problems or linux with half assed desktops, office suites and their issues. And if you're using professional products that only work on Windows (Solidworks, Autocad, the vast majority of PLC programming software), your best bet is to use vmware on top of either OSX or your favorite linux distribution.

    It's very hard to get away from Microsoft, believe me I'm trying and I get very disappointed at the alternative options. And you think that's bad, Microsoft is getting into the industrial safety world and Industrial PLC's (Beckhoff's all run Windows 7 embedded and crash all the time, bricked at least 10 of them doing firmware upgrades). Imagine your safety being relied upon Microsoft. Also doesn't help that the mass influx of Chinese products is using Microsoft or some messed up Android version.

  131. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure 10 is a perfectly fine OS. As was 8.1, 7, vista (once it stabilised), hell even xp. Which is the point. An upgrade will, like previous ones, offer some minor gains, some minor losses, a bunch of slightly annoying changes for change sake that we'll more or less get used to, some lost productivity doing the upgrade, and a lot of time and effort down the drain fixing the problems that always arise (program x no longer works, I lost these settings, why won't it talk to my hardware... that kind of thing). So, to turn the question around: why would people WANT a free upgrade? What, really, is the benefit?

  132. Open Secure Boot by tepples · · Score: 1

    Ostensibly to prevent malware from installing itself into the boot process as a hypervisor. Such bootkits date back to the days of booting from floppy disks, when they were called "boot sector viruses". The original idea was that you'd add the public key for whatever operating system you plan to run to a PC's UEFI settings.

    UEFI Secure Boot can be deployed in two ways: open, where the owner of a machine can add new public keys or turn off Secure Boot entirely, or closed, where the owner of a machine can do neither of these things. Manufacturers of PCs and motherboards certified for Windows 8 (x86) or Windows 8 (x86-64) were required to include open Secure Boot, relegating closed Secure Boot to Windows RT. True, as of Windows 10, Microsoft began to allow PCs to ship with either open or closed Secure Boot. But in practice, what fraction of PCs are sold with closed Secure Boot?

  133. predatory faggot shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    distrowatch.com

  134. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Yup... A supposedly fully "castrated" copy of Windows 10, (local account only, all of the spyware switches turned off, several other settings in gpedit.msc disabled) STILL constantly blabs away to many of the listed domains. Just to show a couple of neighbors who doubted the fact that Windows 10 was such a privacy nightmare, I used a previously unused Windows 7 productkey to install the latest build (November update) on a spare laptop drive. I turned off all the bullshit, used a local account, cruised thru gpedit.msc and turned more shit off.. Then loaded rpcapd on my router and pointed a copy of wireshark at it... Oh my god... I saved the packet capture for use to show other neighbors/friends WHY friends DON'T LET FRIENDS use Windows 10...... After 19+ years supporting/using MS products, I quit in 2010, and after seeing what a nightmare Windows 10 is, I couldn't be happier.... KUbuntu FTW!!!!!

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  135. wow that is crap by CTU · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the warning. I hid that update and not going to get it.

  136. This is great! by DraKKon · · Score: 1

    I'm so glad that my wife's labtop, which cannot handle Windows 8.1, let alone, Windows 10, will get nagged 2x daily to install an OS that WILL NOT WORK on the laptop. I've tried. Netowrk drivers, touch screen and touch pad all fail and the lap top maker says it will not support windows 8.1 or Windows 10. This is total BS form M$FT.

    --
    "It's not like your minds are as open as the source you love..." - Me to the majority of Slashdot.
  137. My List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is my remove/no install list so far, some are gwx, some are telemetry, some are crap I just don't want.

    971033 (if you use cracks/loaders to activate W7)
    2952664
    2976978
    2990214
    3012973
    3015249
    3021917
    3022345
    3035583*gwx
    3044374
    3050265
    3050267
    3065987
    3068708
    3073218*gwx
    3075249
    3075851
    3080149
    3083324
    3102429
    3112343

  138. KB3035583 shows as optional on my Win 7 system by khelms · · Score: 1

    Windows update categorizes patches as either important or optional. The KB3035583 one is in the optional list. I've got updates set to "let me know, but I'll decide when to download them".

    Am I safe to download the important updates and ignore the optional ones, or are there trojan horses among the important updates also?

    1. Re:KB3035583 shows as optional on my Win 7 system by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      There's a number of updates that you shall worry about, not only the Win10 nagger.

      My list so far:
      wusa /uninstall /kb:xxxxxxx /norestart

      replace /kb:xxxxxxx with the following one at a time: /kb:3083325
      /kb:3083324
      /kb:2976978
      /kb:3075853
      /kb:3065987
      /kb:3050265
      /kb:3050267
      /kb:3075851
      /kb:2902907
      /kb:3068708
      /kb:3022345
      /kb:2952664
      /kb:2990214
      /kb:3035583
      /kb:3021917
      /kb:3044374
      /kb:3046480
      /kb:3075249
      /kb:3080149

      optionally also the following, but it's a hit&miss if it's a good idea to uninstall:
      /kb:971033

      Don't run the /quiet option because then you don't know if it's successful or not.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  139. Uninstall KB3035583 and disable RECOMMEND UPDATES by ahowlett · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, the correct way to get rid of the windows 10 nag is:

    1. De-select recommended updates in Windows update
    2. Uninstall KB3035583
    3. Re-boot
    4. Uninstall KB3035583 again (yes, it is still there! have to uninstall twice)
    5. Re-boot
    6. Check Installed Updates, KB3035583 should be gone

    De-selecting recommended updates is important because selecting that basically says "Microsoft can install whatever updates they want"

    Uninstalling KB3035583 twice is important, because it is usually still there if you only uninstall once.

  140. really looks like unstoppable electronic spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It kinda makes one wonder how this could be viewed under the Canadian so-called "anti-spam" laws....especially since the terminology used in said laws is "commercial electronic messages", and not strictly "email".

  141. Secret plan? by simpz · · Score: 1

    And maybe not even MS's. Use the telemetry to report use of non-authorized versions of movies, TV shows, music to MPAA etc. They can send you the bill...

    Or just blocking 'piracy' software that they consider unacceptable...EAC etc

    Not this year, not next, but 5 years time?

    Once MS has this data and everyone is over to these Malwared versions. Even if MS don't want I can see them being sued to enable this.

  142. Scrolling thru posts and don't see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....where anyone has tried setting permissions on the registry.

    Seriously? You didn't know you could do that just like on a file system? Locate the manual change M$hit is reversing, then right-click, Permissions, set the Permissions to a locked down that only you can control. Try removing 'System' as an authorized FullControl account from that Key if you have to, but try it and let the rest of us know.

  143. Ok, we know it was spyware... by Rainwulf · · Score: 1

    Its now also officially malware, modifying the registry to force you to download something. This is the realm of drive by downloaders and malware authors.

    Why is it ok that microsoft does this?

  144. Microsft must REALLY need your data to sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are their books looking so grim they have to pull this kind of thuggery on there users so they can sell there data to advertisers? Sure sounds like things are getting really bad inside of the finance department at Microsoft.

  145. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let Windows 10 install and fuck Microsoft in court with your machines as physical evidence.

    You will recover your losses and more in the settlement far faster than you will recover losses in other court venues.

  146. Class Action Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It only takes 1 person to step forward and start a Class Action suit. Surprisingly easy.
    I have a cracked win7, so this doesn't affect me for reasons that I don't care enough to research.

    Regardless, there are a multitude of reasons why people do not want to, or can NOT upgrade. Forcing someone, 5 years early yet, is a steaming load.
    Time to make them care.

  147. It's not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, it does not fetch and install systemd...

  148. Get Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn I'm glad I use Linux.

  149. 3 GB is only 1 percent of Comcast's 300 GB cap by tepples · · Score: 1

    And don't take me wrong. I'm not saying it's not wrong but the average /. user most probably runs torrents, Netflix or some other form of high bandwidth software. Those 3GB of download are a drop in the bucket.

    3GB, over a metered connection?

    I think Ravaldy is trying to claim that the average Slashdot user is on a connection that is not metered so tightly that 3 GB would make a significant difference. It's only 1 percent of Comcast's monthly data allowance, for example. Cellular and satellite are metered far more tightly, but the consensus on Slashdot[1] appears to be that if the only Internet options are available to you are cellular and satellite, you ought to move within the service area of a less harshly metered option.

    [1] See comments by sglewis100, AC, AC, AC, Zero__Kelvin, allquixotic, AC, Bengie, Bengie again, and FlyHelicopters.

  150. The VM will still do this by tepples · · Score: 1

    Even if you do manage to buy a PC whose hardware Linux fully supports, the copy of Windows 7 that you buy to run work-necessary, Wine-incompatible applications in a virtual machine will still pull this shit and try to upgrade itself to Windows 10.

  151. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by tepples · · Score: 1

    Secondly "apps" are a PITA because they do not follow my forced display language.

    Would you prefer that an app be made entirely unavailable for download if its (often small) developer has not yet translated the app to your "forced display language"?

  152. simple: Linux by Mr_Nitro · · Score: 1

    I am already at my 4th computer Os conversion to linux (mint/ubuntu). I must use window for work purposes but anything else (and family/older relatives) are being converted to linux. Watch out M$..

  153. msft missing an opportunity by feldmark · · Score: 1

    In case Microsoftee's read slashdot, they are missing an opportunity. I love my Windows 7 machine but am VERY uncomfortable with the idea of upgrading to Windows 10. But... I still run a copy of XP and Vista on Windows 10 compatible hardware which I would gladly upgrade to test it out. (When Vista goes unsupported I currently plan to migrate both to Linux.) But give me a free upgrade on XP and Vista (which you dont want around any more either) and maybe someday I'll say yes to the upgrade nagware on 7.

  154. Windows 7 updates discontinued? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincident with Microsoft's more aggressive Windows 10 update campaign, I have not received - even when manually checking - any "important" or "optional" (other than two Windows Security Essentials and the default selected Windows 10 upgrade) Windows 7 updates. Has anyone else experienced this? Is there a known solution?

  155. Get GWX Control Panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to take some measure of control back, visit http://blog.ultimateoutsider.com/2015/08/using-gwx-stopper-to-permanently-remove.html and download the GWX control panel. It works (at least so far).

  156. Where is the FTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is the gov going to step in and investigate this crap? They are not probably because the government has a stake in the data collection going on. this is far worse than the monopoly crap that they were sued for a over a decade ago.

  157. It still amazes me... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    After years and years of complaining about Microsoft doing this to your system or changing policies or putting a new "feature" it's still humorous to see the outrage.

    1) Microsoft is a company. A company in this case which is a profit making entity. They will bundle "features" tying you to their system and will do "noncompetitive" things to retain and enhance market share. When you install your O/S there's T's and C's that you agree to or were agreed to on your behalf.
    2) Yeah, forcing downloads of multiple GB multiple times is unscrupulous behavior but refer to #1 above. Nagging you all the time is a firing squad offense in my book.
    3) There's alternatives, use them instead of MSFT products. If you don't like the MSFT bullshit, don't use it or keep your system and disable all automatic updates and get Autopatcher. Autopatcher can keep you up to date without all the phantom re-installs of disabled patches.
    4) If you're an end-user who doesn't know what's going on, carry on get the upgrade or pay Geeksquad to upgrade you. If you're so inclined just buy a new machine with it already installed and transfer your files. This commonly known as the "if you like your Microsoft, you can keep your Microsoft" strategy.
    5) MSFT will only start changing its cultural/instrusionware policy if enough customers walk away or they get hit by a Class Action lawsuit. Again refer to #1 above.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  158. Re:I Will Call Microsoft Technical Support About I by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    You may as well watch Clippy dance on your screen, it's about as effective as calling MSFT tech support.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  159. YES by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    I am so happy :'D

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  160. Windows 10 nag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well you can always give yourself all permissions on the \windows\system32\GWX folder and delete it once you have shut down the GWX.exe process.
    Then go to Computer management, Task Scheduler, Microsoft, Windows, setup and delete al tasks in the gwx task subfolder......seems to do the job.
    I suppose you can also delete tasks in the other subfolder named GWXTriggers but I haven't bothered to work it out yet !

  161. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by captjc · · Score: 1

    You don't say? This is a bargain basement PC with no expansion slots. There is no reason for her to upgrade when Windows 7 works fine for what it is used for: recipes, pictures, Facebook, and browser games.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  162. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If windows 10 is going BSOD constantly when earlier versions of windows aren't, it's not windows 10, it's your shitty hardware.

    I have a laptop which does a BSOD on windows 10 every 20 minutes because the wireless card is a piece. Changing out the drivers with older versions fixed the problem

  163. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

    Would you prefer that an app be made entirely unavailable for download if its (often small) developer has not yet translated the app to your "forced display language"?

    My forced display language is English. And why is using my keyboard layout language somehow a better choice than the display language I've explicitly told it I want?

  164. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by tepples · · Score: 1

    My forced display language is English.

    Thank you. I was trying to infer what you meant; the best I could come up with at the time was "I speak Lithuanian; why aren't all the apps available in Lithuanian?" Now the best scenario I can come up with is that you might get apps intended for use in a particular locale outside Five Eyes that are available only in the official or majority language of that locale.

    And why is using my keyboard layout language somehow a better choice than the display language I've explicitly told it I want?

    If an app ignores the display language in favor of the language for which your keyboard layout was intended, then that's either a bug or DRM. Have you reported it to the developer of each affected app? Or does it affect all apps system-wide?

  165. How many remain vulnerable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many computers MS has made insecure by causing people to shut off automatic updates?

  166. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No worries. This link shows you how to recover the 6 GB of downloaded 10 files and how to get rid of the nag screen once and for all. It works and I have cleaned up 3 machines. Just make sure that after you uninstall those 3 KB updates for Windows 7 that you change the windows update settings to NEVER CHECK FOR UPDATES. Only then will you restart the computer. When done, manually check for windows updates and then right click on those files and "hide them" After that, you can select download windows updates automatically. The only way it will come back is if MS decides to repackage those KB updates in a different name or file size. They already did that earlier in the year but I'm thinking they might hold off now. Mainly because if somebody is willing to go through all that work to hide and delete all the W10 files they will be majorly pissed if MS sneaks them in anyway. It will cause allot of bad PR with the public. And in the end, those users will still avoid it anyway if they have gone to that much trouble to avoid W10. So my thoughts on this is this remedy will probably hold.

    I'm also wondering what MS will do once the free upgrade period ends? Obviously, at this rate they will no way hit their 1 billion install base. They will probably extend the offer? Or will the nag still be there saying you can upgrade for X dollars? It will be interesting to see what happens.

    http://betanews.com/2015/09/11/remove-unwanted-windows-10-upgrade-files-from-windows-7-and-windows-8-x/

    The main reason I really like W7 is that no matter what MS does, the user still has control over windows update in the end. You still have the ability to uninstall and hide KB updates. This is the main reason I am avoiding Windows 10. I would rather pay for a copy of Windows 10 if it gave me the tools to control windows updates. But as it is, W10 will update automatically with no user control or consent to whatever they want moving forward. I don't care how good W10 is. Giving up this much user control over their PC is unacceptable. I simply don't agree to the TOS on this one MS.

  167. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

    Now the best scenario I can come up with is that you might get apps intended for use in a particular locale outside Five Eyes that are available only in the official or majority language of that locale.

    No idea what the Five Eyes are, but my situation is this: I live in Norway, I cannot stand having anything but english as the display language in my OS, but I want to be able to type my name, emails, documents etc using norwegian keyboard layout as the norwegian alphabet contains æÃÃ¥.

    Have you reported it to the developer of each affected app? Or does it affect all apps system-wide?

    It affects all the _apps_ that are installed by default, so I'll say it's Microsoft. Note that the desktop, and all desktop-related programs, correctly respects my language choice.

    And I'm not alone, social.microsoft.com has several posts on the issue from other people.

  168. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

    Ãf¦ÃfÃfÂ¥

    Gah forgot slashdot is in the technological stoneage... The norwegian alphabet contains three letters not found in the english alphabet.

  169. Re:Why would you not want to upgrade to Windows 10 by tepples · · Score: 1

    No idea what the Five Eyes are

    The Five Eyes are the major Anglophone countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States), which also happen to be part of a signals intelligence cooperation treaty.

    [Use of keyboard language rather than display language for display] affects all the [UWP] _apps_ that are installed by default, so I'll say it's Microsoft. Note that the desktop, and all desktop-related programs, correctly respects my language choice.

    Then you've found a genuine defect in the UWP subsystem, and yes, it should be reported to both Microsoft and the public.

    And I'm not alone, social.microsoft.com has several posts on the issue from other people.

    Do you have a blog, a social media account, or other means through which you can raise awareness of this defect in order to encourage other users to put pressure on Microsoft to fix it?