You are a liar defending another liar. Just shut the fuck up already. Nobody gives a what what liars have to say because you have demonstrated that yours words cannot be trusted
Life is just going to keep getting harder and harder for you because you cant undo what you've done, which is to repeatedly ruin your own credibility.
It may not be a good game because of catering to the perpetually offended.
There is one fact I know: If you cater to the people that arent your customers at the expense of your customers, then you will absolutely lose customers, and the people you catered to will move on to fuck with something else.
The guy proposing the law is from San Francisco -- the locals tend to be fairly anti-corporate, even if the place is infested with techbros recently.
The locals also only care what politicians are saying, not what they are doing. Democrats, for instance, are always saying they are the party of the worker, meanwhile they repeatedly shove a giant corporate cock down everyones throat
He wants it to be true, therefore it is his truth.
This is where we fucking are now. Fuckers just make shit up (and yes, the fucker did just make shit up) and then argue how the world should change because his fucking lie is more important than facts.
Because they are part of the Department of Homeland Security and perform law enforcement duties.
You really really really dont want the DoD to be a law enforcement agency. Seriously. If the government ever moves to make that happen , then I implore you to march with me on Washington with rifle in hand.
If your first attempt to be right was just complete bullshit, then why should we consider your second attempt to be right genuine? Thats right, we shouldn't, because a fucking liar cant be fucking trusted, and your first attempt proved that you are a fucking liar.
Its the Democrats that are in the pockets of the banks. If the bailouts didnt prove it to you, then the fact that campaign donation databases are easily searchable should. The Democrats are the big corporate party going by the only important numbers... the money.
Not comparable to private industry surveys because anybody that admits that they would be willing to work harder for the same money in the private sector is a complete moron and will get exactly that.
I have a project for all those living paycheck to paycheck.
Get a spreadsheet for your smart phone or bring a note pad everywhere. Note down every expense you incur and what it was for, the time of day, etc.
Judging by what I know of the bay areas of California, I suspect a very large amount of people there spend significantly over $100/mo just in coffee shops and that they themselves have no idea that its as much as it is. Almost all of this money can only be attributed to convenience even if coffee is considered a necessity (I understand for some it may be) because you can just make a pot at home and bring it with you.
The first step to good budgeting is knowing what you are spending money on, and by knowing this does not mean guessing and ballpark figures.. it means knowing.
The autobahn is a limited access freeway system designed specifically for high speed
The department of redundancy department would like to inform you that freeways are designed for high speed, not just the subset you want to claim are the only ones designed for high speed.
Slashdot Mirror
You are a liar defending another liar. Just shut the fuck up already. Nobody gives a what what liars have to say because you have demonstrated that yours words cannot be trusted
Life is just going to keep getting harder and harder for you because you cant undo what you've done, which is to repeatedly ruin your own credibility.
It may not be a good game because of catering to the perpetually offended.
There is one fact I know: If you cater to the people that arent your customers at the expense of your customers, then you will absolutely lose customers, and the people you catered to will move on to fuck with something else.
Both of you are wrong.
Judges and Juries are determiners of fact. A trier of fact, or finder of fact...
The court is a body which adjudicates disputes and administers justice
Now both of you stop making shit up. Fucking disgusting.
Internal Wikileaks communications are not public data.
Everything is public data to the NSA.
Using a burner email for your receipts sounds like you dont want a receipt. Some of us do, asshole.
The guy proposing the law is from San Francisco -- the locals tend to be fairly anti-corporate, even if the place is infested with techbros recently.
The locals also only care what politicians are saying, not what they are doing. Democrats, for instance, are always saying they are the party of the worker, meanwhile they repeatedly shove a giant corporate cock down everyones throat
It's self-evident for those here, but not to the national media that came in when the caravan arrived and San Ysidro was closed briefly.
It is also self evidence to the national media, but they are dishonest fucks with an agenda.
I don't know how you could argue that.
He wants it to be true, therefore it is his truth.
This is where we fucking are now. Fuckers just make shit up (and yes, the fucker did just make shit up) and then argue how the world should change because his fucking lie is more important than facts.
because it was soooo settled that nobody disagreed at all... yet here we are.
I think one side IS inventing facts here, but in this case it's not who you seem to think.
More like its not who he is willing to admit.
The Democrats are the only ones acting honestly here.
You certainly arent. I see outright lies, one of them has been called out already.
Do you want to play the game of how many ways you have just proven that nobody should ever fucking trust you?
And if he people that patrol that border request additional funding for physical barriers to help them enforce our laws?
Stop making sense. The Democrats will never discuss what the border patrol wants, because the border patrol wants them to get the fuck out of the way.
For a project with no corresponding authorization bill?
Authorized in 2006, spending stopped in 2009 when Obama took office in spite of the bill authorizing the spending.
Because they are part of the Department of Homeland Security and perform law enforcement duties.
You really really really dont want the DoD to be a law enforcement agency. Seriously. If the government ever moves to make that happen , then I implore you to march with me on Washington with rifle in hand.
Narrative. Thats what it is.
As you have noted, they are generally more confident about things since Trump got elected.
Nice backtrack and goal post move you did there.
If your first attempt to be right was just complete bullshit, then why should we consider your second attempt to be right genuine? Thats right, we shouldn't, because a fucking liar cant be fucking trusted, and your first attempt proved that you are a fucking liar.
Its the Democrats that are in the pockets of the banks. If the bailouts didnt prove it to you, then the fact that campaign donation databases are easily searchable should. The Democrats are the big corporate party going by the only important numbers... the money.
Not comparable to private industry surveys because anybody that admits that they would be willing to work harder for the same money in the private sector is a complete moron and will get exactly that.
If they are essential since they have not been furloughed they do not since they are still employed and working.
Stop making stuff up. Its called partial unemployment and can be used whenever your income significantly decreases.
They had 60 days warning of maybe. If it were me, I'd just look for other work
Good on you. This makes it easier for the smart people that, you know, take advantage of the unemployment insurance they have been paying into.
But meh... to each their own I guess.. dont want to discourage you from stupidly leaving money on the table...
Because he doesnt know what he is saying.
I have a project for all those living paycheck to paycheck.
Get a spreadsheet for your smart phone or bring a note pad everywhere. Note down every expense you incur and what it was for, the time of day, etc.
Judging by what I know of the bay areas of California, I suspect a very large amount of people there spend significantly over $100/mo just in coffee shops and that they themselves have no idea that its as much as it is. Almost all of this money can only be attributed to convenience even if coffee is considered a necessity (I understand for some it may be) because you can just make a pot at home and bring it with you.
The first step to good budgeting is knowing what you are spending money on, and by knowing this does not mean guessing and ballpark figures.. it means knowing.
Go watch your town council in action some time. This is EXACTLY the stuff they mainly concern themselves with.
The autobahn is a limited access freeway system designed specifically for high speed
The department of redundancy department would like to inform you that freeways are designed for high speed, not just the subset you want to claim are the only ones designed for high speed.
The real solution for your school zone are inexpensive speed bumps.
The bullshit solution is speed cameras.