More likely it is that what he thinks is important actually isn't.
The masters dont just write an algorithm, they prove metrics about it. They prove that its O(n log n) worst case complexity, that it only ever needs O(n) space, that it will recurse O(log n) times at most, that it handles all possible inputs, and so on.
When the worst thing that can happen is that you have to restore from backup and you lose a little uptime, then you arent working on important things. When the worst thing that happens is that you just sold a hundred thousand time bombs that will cost millions to recall or patch, then you are working on important things.
For those that dont get it, I present to you exhibit A: all the problems we have seen with SSD firmwares because they hired monkeys instead of priests.
Looks more like a story claiming there was "propaganda" on a Russian news outlet.
Pretty sure a Russian news outlet isnt targeting any propaganda at Americans, and in this case the "truth" behind the "propaganda" is that the girl in question was merely the victim of child abuse instead of..... rape?
I'm going to assume that your citation categorically represents what someone would find if they tried really hard to find evidence via google, and that everyone that tried really hard, but you, realized that they couldnt find any.
Gary Johnson was a good Governor (the only reason he isnt still governor of New Mexico is term limits) but a bad candidate. Sarwark would be a good candidate.
She didn't lose because of "fake news", she lost because people don't like her and because poor folks don't see Democrats in power and think "my problems will be solved" any more.
As has always been the case, its the economy, stupid!
You don't get voted in when people are getting fucked by the things you support.
The secret group PropOrNot also listed as "allies" many journalists and publications that have never heard of the group before the article. as is evidenced by their twitter responses.
When this came to light, PropOrNot edited their web page to list them only as "related projects."
To translate what really happened here is:
The Washington Post was duped by a fake article about fake news, and then other publicans were duped by the Washington Post's article about the fake article about fake news.
Journalism is now completely dead, or at least the kind the mainstream media used to produce. Its all now just lazy he-said she-said bullshit where the only filter is the bias of the Journalists and Publications.
Investigative journalism is now only done by independent folk with hidden cameras, and released on youtube. Thats what exposed Clinton's campaign tactics and voter fraud methods, its what exposed and subsequently destroyed ACORN, and so on.
because a nice feature of fingerprinting is that changing one of the variables changes the fingerprint, which means spoofing useragent and rotating between a couple dozen every 5 minutes is enough to throw browser fingerprinting off.
Translation: I've made my browser even more unique, therefore they have no idea who I am!!!!!1!!1111!1
I used to be one of the people that thought the increased alcohol content would ruin gaskets, hoses, and cylinder walls, but the auto industry has already addressed it years ago.
So it does do that, just not with your current car, so everything is cool?
Most decent journals have a process for appealing bad reviews, and in my experience, the editors tend to pretty quickly ignore reviews that are lazy or conflict with the paper.
You say this like its a good thing. The only reviews that get appealed would be the ones that stop a paper from being published. No author is going to appeal a review that gets his/her paper published.
The end result can only be more fake papers being published, not less.
You do realise that the idea of a peer review is for others to replicate the research and attempt to come to the same conclusions from their own datasets, right?
You literally just made that up, knew you were doing it, but didnt give a fuck that you were completely full of shit.
You also thought everyone else was completely stupid? For fuck sakes.... never post again.
NYT executive editor Dean Baquet recently released a letter to its readers on the subject of rededicating itself to truth, and you can't rededicate yourself to something you are already dedicated to, and I quote:
"As we reflect on this week's momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you." - Dean Baquet, Executive Editor, New York Times.
NYT is a bunch of biased fucks, but they've pathetically admitted it and promised not to do it any more. They did this because subscriptions started to plummet when its readers found out how big of a circle-jerk fantasy their reporting was about the election. Its damage control, and an empty promise. They've rededicated themselves to pretending they are honest for a moment.
Have you not noticed that ever since Trump won the election, the hacks stopped being from "Russia" are started being "State-sponsored" and from a "Nation-state" ?
There is one nation-state with the most incentive to influence our elections and hack its "prominent" people, and it isnt Russia. Its America.
Slashdot Mirror
Sigh, seriously is it necessary to use muti-drug resistant strain when common parlance is superbug?
When legislating, common parlance should be avoided every time.
"Well regulated" was common parlance when the constitution was written, and loosely meant "in working order."
Now the leftists argue that a ban on public gun ownership is consitutional under the premise that "well regulated" now means "State controlled."
So fuck off with your stupid ideas about how legislation should be worded. Before long, "superbug" will mean something different, moron.
Translation: I dont want to sell to literally half of my potential customer base, because I'm a fucking intolerant tool.
More likely it is that what he thinks is important actually isn't.
The masters dont just write an algorithm, they prove metrics about it. They prove that its O(n log n) worst case complexity, that it only ever needs O(n) space, that it will recurse O(log n) times at most, that it handles all possible inputs, and so on.
When the worst thing that can happen is that you have to restore from backup and you lose a little uptime, then you arent working on important things. When the worst thing that happens is that you just sold a hundred thousand time bombs that will cost millions to recall or patch, then you are working on important things.
For those that dont get it, I present to you exhibit A: all the problems we have seen with SSD firmwares because they hired monkeys instead of priests.
Looks more like a story claiming there was "propaganda" on a Russian news outlet.
Pretty sure a Russian news outlet isnt targeting any propaganda at Americans, and in this case the "truth" behind the "propaganda" is that the girl in question was merely the victim of child abuse instead of..... rape?
I'm going to assume that your citation categorically represents what someone would find if they tried really hard to find evidence via google, and that everyone that tried really hard, but you, realized that they couldnt find any.
I think if the Libertarians had put up Nicholas Sarwark, their party chair, instead of Gary Johnson then they would have done much better.
The guy leaves a very good impression.
Gary Johnson was a good Governor (the only reason he isnt still governor of New Mexico is term limits) but a bad candidate. Sarwark would be a good candidate.
She didn't lose because of "fake news", she lost because people don't like her and because poor folks don't see Democrats in power and think "my problems will be solved" any more.
As has always been the case, its the economy, stupid!
You don't get voted in when people are getting fucked by the things you support.
The secret group PropOrNot also listed as "allies" many journalists and publications that have never heard of the group before the article. as is evidenced by their twitter responses.
When this came to light, PropOrNot edited their web page to list them only as "related projects."
To translate what really happened here is:
The Washington Post was duped by a fake article about fake news, and then other publicans were duped by the Washington Post's article about the fake article about fake news.
Journalism is now completely dead, or at least the kind the mainstream media used to produce. Its all now just lazy he-said she-said bullshit where the only filter is the bias of the Journalists and Publications.
Investigative journalism is now only done by independent folk with hidden cameras, and released on youtube. Thats what exposed Clinton's campaign tactics and voter fraud methods, its what exposed and subsequently destroyed ACORN, and so on.
"We're going to see refugee problems on an unimaginable scale, potentially above 30 million people."
There are currently 60 million war refugees according to UNHCR
So either our military commanders havent kept up with whats been going on the last decade, or they can't even imagine current reality.
because a nice feature of fingerprinting is that changing one of the variables changes the fingerprint, which means spoofing useragent and rotating between a couple dozen every 5 minutes is enough to throw browser fingerprinting off.
Translation: I've made my browser even more unique, therefore they have no idea who I am!!!!!1!!1111!1
Some of us like to call him the patron saint of thieves
In 2008 the media praised Obama for his campaigns social media genius.
In 2016 the media declares social media is the devil.
Are all cars over 20 years old "collector cars" in your opinion?
Because it seems to me that the vast majority of them are "poor people cars"
Perhaps the exponent of 2.0 is just an approximation .. an average
And it seems to me that if space isnt perfectly flat (and we know it isnt) then assuming "2" could be wrong.
The site you are referring to is sch-hub
and here is the paper
I used to be one of the people that thought the increased alcohol content would ruin gaskets, hoses, and cylinder walls, but the auto industry has already addressed it years ago.
So it does do that, just not with your current car, so everything is cool?
Is that why the word "domain" is listed?
The second one is just hand waving.
Most decent journals have a process for appealing bad reviews, and in my experience, the editors tend to pretty quickly ignore reviews that are lazy or conflict with the paper.
You say this like its a good thing. The only reviews that get appealed would be the ones that stop a paper from being published. No author is going to appeal a review that gets his/her paper published.
The end result can only be more fake papers being published, not less.
You do realise that the idea of a peer review is for others to replicate the research and attempt to come to the same conclusions from their own datasets, right?
You literally just made that up, knew you were doing it, but didnt give a fuck that you were completely full of shit.
You also thought everyone else was completely stupid? For fuck sakes.... never post again.
"Open Hardware" is definitely a lie.
You cannot build the chip from "source" yourself. Full stop.
Pretty sure Hillary promised the same thing.
Then its official. Trump is brain-damaged.
Democrats have not only recently rediscovered the virtues of limit government, but also the virtues of following rules?
NYT executive editor Dean Baquet recently released a letter to its readers on the subject of rededicating itself to truth, and you can't rededicate yourself to something you are already dedicated to, and I quote:
"As we reflect on this week's momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you." - Dean Baquet, Executive Editor, New York Times.
NYT is a bunch of biased fucks, but they've pathetically admitted it and promised not to do it any more. They did this because subscriptions started to plummet when its readers found out how big of a circle-jerk fantasy their reporting was about the election. Its damage control, and an empty promise. They've rededicated themselves to pretending they are honest for a moment.
translation:
"Even though me and my kind have been calling you and your kind racists since forever, its actually the russians that are out to get me."
Have you not noticed that ever since Trump won the election, the hacks stopped being from "Russia" are started being "State-sponsored" and from a "Nation-state" ?
There is one nation-state with the most incentive to influence our elections and hack its "prominent" people, and it isnt Russia. Its America.