My understanding is that the blockchain can be forged if more than half of the network agrees
To be succinct, the blockchain that you currently see can be a forged if more than half the network that you can currently see conspires.
I think this distinction is just glossed over. Even if its hard to topple the global belief in the blockchain, its still possible to temporarily manipulate local beliefs.
C and C++ are the foundation because they give you the power to talk directly to the hardware with relative ease and flexibility.
You seem to be confusing pointers with something low level (even BASIC can read and write arbitrary memory.)
Do explain to us, which language feature of C or C++ gives you the power to talk to the hardware directly. All you noob C and C++ programmers that werent banging keys 30 years ago dont seem to have any idea what a phrase like "talk to the hardware" means but you guys sure seem to use it a lot when referring to your favorite language.
Let me explain things for you. The magic of C is that the myriad of algorithms and data structures a simple operating system needs can be expressed succinctly in it, making it a good but still unnecessary choice for writing an operating system. What you think is low level is actually just C's abstract machine, what C programmers target, which you incorrectly think is "hardware."
"Standard" libraries such as io implement common low level functionality through mixed-language measures (frequently inline-assembler) because the C abstract machine, the thing C code is targeting, doesn't have anything low level in it, and for good reason as otherwise it wouldnt be hardware agnostic like its supposed to be.
Instead they're helping people get where they need to go, and they're paying their own way in the process. Working helps your fellow man -- that's why he's glad to pay you for your work. It's good.
Exactly.
People seem to overlook the fact that when a voluntary trade happens that there are always two winners. Before any discussion happens it should be acknowledged that any interference has dubious utility, given that its hard to imagine society doing better than two winners through their interference.
A model will always predict higher or lower than the actual outcome. It will be one or the other, and actually it doesn't matter which, as long as the model correctly predicts within a useful percentile.
Your logic breaks down as soon as there are two models to choose from. If one does have this 50/50 property then the other, which is predicting a different future temperature window, cannot also have this 50/50 property.
Another option is that they carry "emotion" or more accurately to say, they ARE emotions.
I suggest this because I think emotions are a global process rather than a local one, and a simple network of neurons without a global influence would need to be extremely well arranged to mimic a global process.
Want to end poverty? Stop paying poor people to have children.
..and stop creating welfare "meccas" that are just an incentive for people to cluster up in the very areas that dont have enough jobs.
If your city has a lot of unemployed people, the last thing that you would want to do is to give people a reason to migrate into the city, but thats exactly what a liberal welfare policy at the city level will do.
They arent migrating to the north end of Hartford (for instance) because its such a nice area or because employment prospects are so promising.. they are migrating to the north end of Hartford because the city has a liberal welfare system, in a State that has a liberal welfare system, in a country that has earmarked extra federal welfare money for specifically the north end of Hartford (yes, this is for real.. thanks Obama.)
With a poverty level of 24.4% in 2013 (about the same as Jennings, MO), New Haven CT certainly has no fewer kids in need than it did in my time so I don't see the need for such homes decreasing - and if anything the opposite.
New Haven, along with most of the large cities in Connecticut, is a welfare city. The evidence is right in front of you. For instance the largest percentage of Puerto Ricans in the country is in Connecticut (7.1% vs the national average of 1.5%) because of how liberal Connecticut's welfare system is (people are motivated by incentives.)
What Connecticut doesnt need is more welfare. What it needs is (a) more low skill jobs, or (b) less low skill people. Those are the two solutions. The Democrats that run the State manage to continually enact policies that accomplish the opposite of both solutions.
but in areas where a significant part of the population is incapable of housing and feeding themselves
These areas should get less of the kind of dollars you suggest. Handing out money to "sustain" the situation just sustains the situation. It doesn't fix it. It doesn't do anyone any favors either.
Stop creating welfare cities. I'm talking to you, Democrats. I know you do it because the politicians told you its a good idea, but they only told you that because the local large factory owners wants inexpensive workers and make large campaign donations to them, and to seal the deal on this over-supply of workers the politicians you are parroting also pass laws that discourage or even prevent other factories from being built in the area.
Do tell us about what the people that create welfare cities say about worker rights, while ignoring what they actually do to make workers less and less valuable.
^^ a democrat once again proves that they are full blown autistic when it comes to money.
We are spending 393.2 Billion on welfare. Literally 1000 times as much as you think.
This is enough to give almost four hundred thousand people per year enough money to permanently retire on, 4 million people per decade, the entire population of the country in less than a century.
But my words are lost on you, because you can't even tell when 'million' is obviously the wrong unit -- full blown autism when it comes to money.. million.. billion.. no reason to care about the difference because money doesnt make any sense to you.
If 91% of the students are in charter schools it is hard to claim that they are only taking the cream of the crop, isn't it? And yet they are still making large gains in performance.
No fair bringing facts to a rant session against any disruption to the has-failed public school system. These fucks have been saying exactly what he just said again for over a decade now. It was a lie then, and its still a lie now, but the Statist liberal fucks have a narrative to sell so they keep repeating it even though they know they are being dishonest fucks in the process.
They do not. You don't need a credit card. They even provide instructions on how to do this:
"If you're using the store for the first time with an existing Apple ID, you must provide a payment method. After you create the account, you can change your payment information to None."
Its OK to be wrong when you indicate that you might be, otherwise you are declaring something to be a fact that isnt actually as fact. In this case, it makes you a desperate fanboy fuck that happily swallowed what appeared to be a defense of what you covets, but it actually isnt a defense and that what you covet still needs your aid spreading misinformation that makes it look less bad.
I would like to understand how we have brought up some folks like, to take the worst example, weev.
I would like to understand how we have brought up some folks like Bruce Perens, who hate on us so much that they make up victims in order to bludgeon us with his sympathy-fueled hate.
Go fuck yourself, Bruce Perens. I never befopre today expressed any negative feelings towards you or generalized you, but then you did that very thing to me. Go fuck yourself, Bruce Perens.
Since they admit to not having the people to manage a system where you have to do something in return for the money, you are going to just give it away? No questions asked? And is there a system that requires you to be a resident for a minimum time before you are eligible?
First I will point out that I am a huge free market fan. Free To Choose and all that.
A mistake made by armchair economists and even some professional ones is a mistaken focus on money instead of goods and services. Currency is just a proxy for goods and services. All governments that I know of provide some basic level of goods and services, and yes its often through the violence of taxation (but thats another debate.)
The important factors are which goods and services, and how much to provide. The first factor is a big free market win here, because the answer is the goods and services that the people (rather than government) choose. The second factor is self-balancing, supply and demand, again decided by the people instead of the government.
The government is already handing out goods and services and you can't expect it to do otherwise any time soon, so a change to this new model is a big win for free markets.
Slashdot Mirror
More than 60% of all gun inflicted deaths in the U.S. are gun owners killing themselves
Nice dressing on the suicide statistic. This fucker is being disingenuous.
My understanding is that the blockchain can be forged if more than half of the network agrees
To be succinct, the blockchain that you currently see can be a forged if more than half the network that you can currently see conspires.
I think this distinction is just glossed over. Even if its hard to topple the global belief in the blockchain, its still possible to temporarily manipulate local beliefs.
A well-designed C++ class is almost impossible to use incorrectly or unsafely.
Code you guarantee Safe is Safe. Gotcha.
You've just moved the problem to the other side of the class wall and willed it away.
C and C++ are the foundation because they give you the power to talk directly to the hardware with relative ease and flexibility.
You seem to be confusing pointers with something low level (even BASIC can read and write arbitrary memory.)
Do explain to us, which language feature of C or C++ gives you the power to talk to the hardware directly. All you noob C and C++ programmers that werent banging keys 30 years ago dont seem to have any idea what a phrase like "talk to the hardware" means but you guys sure seem to use it a lot when referring to your favorite language.
Let me explain things for you. The magic of C is that the myriad of algorithms and data structures a simple operating system needs can be expressed succinctly in it, making it a good but still unnecessary choice for writing an operating system. What you think is low level is actually just C's abstract machine, what C programmers target, which you incorrectly think is "hardware."
"Standard" libraries such as io implement common low level functionality through mixed-language measures (frequently inline-assembler) because the C abstract machine, the thing C code is targeting, doesn't have anything low level in it, and for good reason as otherwise it wouldnt be hardware agnostic like its supposed to be.
Instead they're helping people get where they need to go, and they're paying their own way in the process. Working helps your fellow man -- that's why he's glad to pay you for your work. It's good.
Exactly.
People seem to overlook the fact that when a voluntary trade happens that there are always two winners. Before any discussion happens it should be acknowledged that any interference has dubious utility, given that its hard to imagine society doing better than two winners through their interference.
If the results are combined
I see. The logic works as long as there exists magic.
A model will always predict higher or lower than the actual outcome. It will be one or the other, and actually it doesn't matter which, as long as the model correctly predicts within a useful percentile.
Your logic breaks down as soon as there are two models to choose from. If one does have this 50/50 property then the other, which is predicting a different future temperature window, cannot also have this 50/50 property.
There you have it, AGW is responsible for terrorism!
Actually I think he was saying that terrorism proves AGW.
Seriously?
Are you suggesting that these companies are taking real losses for decades, yet have continued to produce movies?
Without that you'd better be in full compliance with the license...
Threats work better when they arent vague hand waving.
how do we approximate this new (slow) method of data distribution within a computational system?
Raise and lower activation thresholds (or the bias nodes that you are using to mimic a dynamic threshold.)
Another option is that they carry "emotion" or more accurately to say, they ARE emotions.
I suggest this because I think emotions are a global process rather than a local one, and a simple network of neurons without a global influence would need to be extremely well arranged to mimic a global process.
It's MKS (meters - kilogram - second). You got a problem with that?
Yeah, I got a problem with that. CGS forever!
For those that are unaware, centimeters-grams-seconds (CGS) was the predominant system used by scientists before Système international d'unités.
This is something that the state should decide.
Or we could go more narrow and have counties decide.
Taking this narrowing idea further its the cities and towns that should decide.,
Taking this narrowing idea to its conclusion and its the parents that decide.
Now according to the federal government, the parents now decide.
This is exactly the kind of law that should be federal. The federal government should always be allowed to demand that its up to the people.
You seem confused about the meaning of the word 'spent.'
You have been corrected on this at least a dozen times over the years, but here today you are again repeatedly using this IGNORANT BULLSHIT.
We can only conclude at this point that mdsolar cares about everything but the facts.
We dont have time for you any longer. You are worthless.
Want to end poverty? Stop paying poor people to have children.
If your city has a lot of unemployed people, the last thing that you would want to do is to give people a reason to migrate into the city, but thats exactly what a liberal welfare policy at the city level will do.
They arent migrating to the north end of Hartford (for instance) because its such a nice area or because employment prospects are so promising.. they are migrating to the north end of Hartford because the city has a liberal welfare system, in a State that has a liberal welfare system, in a country that has earmarked extra federal welfare money for specifically the north end of Hartford (yes, this is for real.. thanks Obama.)
With a poverty level of 24.4% in 2013 (about the same as Jennings, MO), New Haven CT certainly has no fewer kids in need than it did in my time so I don't see the need for such homes decreasing - and if anything the opposite.
New Haven, along with most of the large cities in Connecticut, is a welfare city. The evidence is right in front of you. For instance the largest percentage of Puerto Ricans in the country is in Connecticut (7.1% vs the national average of 1.5%) because of how liberal Connecticut's welfare system is (people are motivated by incentives.)
What Connecticut doesnt need is more welfare. What it needs is (a) more low skill jobs, or (b) less low skill people. Those are the two solutions. The Democrats that run the State manage to continually enact policies that accomplish the opposite of both solutions.
but in areas where a significant part of the population is incapable of housing and feeding themselves
These areas should get less of the kind of dollars you suggest. Handing out money to "sustain" the situation just sustains the situation. It doesn't fix it. It doesn't do anyone any favors either.
Stop creating welfare cities. I'm talking to you, Democrats. I know you do it because the politicians told you its a good idea, but they only told you that because the local large factory owners wants inexpensive workers and make large campaign donations to them, and to seal the deal on this over-supply of workers the politicians you are parroting also pass laws that discourage or even prevent other factories from being built in the area.
Do tell us about what the people that create welfare cities say about worker rights, while ignoring what they actually do to make workers less and less valuable.
But we only spend 393 million on welfare.
^^ a democrat once again proves that they are full blown autistic when it comes to money.
We are spending 393.2 Billion on welfare. Literally 1000 times as much as you think.
This is enough to give almost four hundred thousand people per year enough money to permanently retire on, 4 million people per decade, the entire population of the country in less than a century.
But my words are lost on you, because you can't even tell when 'million' is obviously the wrong unit -- full blown autism when it comes to money.. million.. billion.. no reason to care about the difference because money doesnt make any sense to you.
If 91% of the students are in charter schools it is hard to claim that they are only taking the cream of the crop, isn't it? And yet they are still making large gains in performance.
No fair bringing facts to a rant session against any disruption to the has-failed public school system. These fucks have been saying exactly what he just said again for over a decade now. It was a lie then, and its still a lie now, but the Statist liberal fucks have a narrative to sell so they keep repeating it even though they know they are being dishonest fucks in the process.
They do not. You don't need a credit card. They even provide instructions on how to do this:
"If you're using the store for the first time with an existing Apple ID, you must provide a payment method. After you create the account, you can change your payment information to None."
Its OK to be wrong when you indicate that you might be, otherwise you are declaring something to be a fact that isnt actually as fact. In this case, it makes you a desperate fanboy fuck that happily swallowed what appeared to be a defense of what you covets, but it actually isnt a defense and that what you covet still needs your aid spreading misinformation that makes it look less bad.
We are supposed to be a nation of laws, not a nation of whatever-the-judge-feels.
I would like to understand how we have brought up some folks like, to take the worst example, weev.
I would like to understand how we have brought up some folks like Bruce Perens, who hate on us so much that they make up victims in order to bludgeon us with his sympathy-fueled hate.
Go fuck yourself, Bruce Perens. I never befopre today expressed any negative feelings towards you or generalized you, but then you did that very thing to me. Go fuck yourself, Bruce Perens.
Since they admit to not having the people to manage a system where you have to do something in return for the money, you are going to just give it away? No questions asked? And is there a system that requires you to be a resident for a minimum time before you are eligible?
First I will point out that I am a huge free market fan. Free To Choose and all that.
A mistake made by armchair economists and even some professional ones is a mistaken focus on money instead of goods and services. Currency is just a proxy for goods and services. All governments that I know of provide some basic level of goods and services, and yes its often through the violence of taxation (but thats another debate.)
The important factors are which goods and services, and how much to provide. The first factor is a big free market win here, because the answer is the goods and services that the people (rather than government) choose. The second factor is self-balancing, supply and demand, again decided by the people instead of the government.
The government is already handing out goods and services and you can't expect it to do otherwise any time soon, so a change to this new model is a big win for free markets.
But I really, really want everyone to know how much I care about things that don't affect my own life in any meaningful way!
My thoughts and prayers go out to those stricken by apathy.