They'll just make sure the people with least seniority get fired first.
As a member of a union, I can attest to this. Unions exist to protect the most senior, and its not just during layoffs. Everything goes by seniority once you unionize.
People keep saying that unions were demonized by republicans or whatever... wrong. They are demonized by themselves.
In society, is it the men or the women? Dont avoid answering questions just because its uncomfortable. You claim both and we know its not true. Men don't give a shit about colors.
No man is an island
This is exactly what someone says when they are trying to take away someones liberty.
Wait...government is violence? And then you respond with such a violent tone?
Yes, and its not a violent tone. Its a promise. Let me repeat this one more time. You. Do. Not. Get. To. Fuck. Up. My. Kids.
You do NOT get to be a self absorbed asshole who fucks things up for everyone else.
I am fucking things up for you,....by not letting you fuck up my kids?
See right here is your agenda in full nakedness. You are so self-righteous that you think that you know best for everyone else.
Let me repeat my promise and this is not a fucking joke. If you try to fuck up my kids I will fucking kill you. Remember that when you are trying to push one of your feel-good initiatives via government. People like me are legion. There is no corner of this country where you wont find someone who will fucking kill you if you fuck with their kids.
Or boys play with action figures of soldiers and astronauts and whatnot, while girls play with barbies and miniature houses.
This has of course been studied more than once on children before they could have been coerced by social stereotypes. You do know what the results of these studies were, right?
Girls ARE actively discouraged from pursuing careers in science and technology as they're more "masculine" occupations and steered towards more "feminine" occupations like teacher and nurse.
Who is doing the "active" discouraging?
I have an idea. You raise your kids, and I'll raise mine. If you fuck your kids up thats your business. If I fuck my kids up thats my business. If you ever try to tell me how to raise my kids I'll tell you to STFU, and if you ever try to force it through government coercion (violence) then I'll fucking kill you. If your kids try the same I'll kill them too. You do not get to fuck up my kids. Period.
You voted yourself up with your sock puppets, then more people than you have sock puppets modded you down. Deal with it. The system is designed to prevent you from gaming it. Its not unfair. You are just stupid.
I have been in the trenches for decades and for the most part professionals don't act like jerks.
Then there is no need for a code of conduct.
I think the real problem here is that people like you do not know what these social justice warriors are talking about.
They are talking about being able to take offense at whatever the hell they want. Statements such as "even my grandmother could use it" will be used against you, but only when they decide that you are next.
for light hearted technical information.
This is very offensive to people with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Its a medical condition and out of their control. You should be banned from the internet you insensitive neanderthal.
Anyone got the DOCS on this guy? Lets get him fired.
Greenland ice is not growing. In fact the decline in volume is accelerating
They said the same thing about Antarctic ice volume. Repeatedly. They were even saying it after those alarmists got themselves stuck in the growing ice in 2013 and needed an international rescue effort. They were saying it until this week.
Liberals are all about freedom, expression, tolerance, etc. until you do or say something that they don't like.
Democrats are Opposite People. Whatever they are saying is always the opposite of what they actually do in practice. Hell, look at what they were saying about health insurance and then look at what they did to health insurance. 100% opposite. Then look at who they blame for what they did to health insurance and how the House and Senate votes actually went. 100% opposite.
Its true for every single topic. These are the least generous of the two parties complaining about how selfish the other party is. They are the party that focuses on skin color while calling the other party racists. They are the party of womanizers complaining that the other party is sexist. They are the party of tax cheats complaining that the other party dodges taxes. They are the party that continually insisted that there wasn't a housing bubble and then blamed the other party for the housing bubble when it burst. They are the anti-vaxxers complaining that the other party is anti-science.
Its like the politician that cheats on his taxes campaigning on how bad it is that all the rich people are cheating on their taxes, the politician involved in black market arms dealing saying we need stricter gun control because its too easy to get guns, or the least generous political party complaining about how selfish they imagine that the most generous political party is.
The term in America is simply "projection." And if you havent picked up what I am putting down here, its Democrats.
It's not about you. Because you don't experience it or care doesn't mean it can be ignored or dismissed.
Actually it does mean I can ignore or dismiss it.
I am responsible for me. You are responsible for you. Don't tell me I have to also be responsible for you, because thats fucking evil slavery you slaver asshole.
it is generally pretty likely that the implied probabilities determined by a balanced book are pretty good representations of the actual probabilities of the team success.
unless its a local team.. in which case the betting is so lopsided that balancing the action results in such extreme odds that few bettors wish to place any wagers on either side, because they are fans and wont bet against "their favorite team" no matter what the odds...in these cases the local bookie gets in touch with a bookie local to the other team and they pool up the action so that the odds they need to offer arent so extreme.
you've probably paid closer to $819.67. That's a pretty good deal for 17 years of space station.
Notice how this defender of the space station has decided to measure the benefit that the space station has given us by counting the years that it been up, rather than by counting the benefit the space station has given us.
Amazing how fucking fanboys can rationalize pretty much anything by throwing out meaningless numbers.
I've linked to the "Basic" explanation, but there Intermediate and Advanced explanations that go into more detail.
..and nothing about your link refutes what the GP said.
In fact, your link exactly echoes what he said:
Basic: "The "decline" refers to a decline in northern tree-rings..."
What the GP brought up is that these tree rings are trusted as proxies for measuring historic temperature, but for a fact (a fact so strong that it must be 'hidden') modern tree ring growth does not correlate with modern temperature measurements..
This undermines almost all the AGW climate science because all the AGW climate science requires those tree rings to show how much cooler it was in the past.
..and to really fuck over your rationalization:
Advanced: "It actually refers to a decline in tree growth at certain high-latitude locations. This decline began in the 1960s when tree-ring proxies diverged from the temperature record."
They claim that this decline began in the 1960s, and its just coincidental that the timing correlates to when we started getting good first-hand temperature data of the entire planet via satellites.
Money has to keep moving or civilization collapses, and when you guys that turn the screws and get ALL the money keep it, it gets sucked out of the economy and stuck in the Cayman Islands or some such place.
What a bunch of shit. All you armchair economists focus on the currency and because of that you come up with insane conclusions.
The facts are that an average person will always be able to trade a day of their labor for a day of another average persons labor.
See how I took "money" out of it and destroyed your argument?
Economics is not about money. Economics is about the allocation of resources.
You probably measure wealth in money too. Sorry pal. The measure of a mans wealth is the measure of the goods as services the man enjoys, not the enumeration of his money.
Pro-tip: If your argument about economics relies on there being "money" then its a flawed argument. The degree to which it is flawed depends on the degree to which you must depart from what money represents in order to make the argument.
Your argument required the largest possible departure from what money represents. Your argument is therefore flawed to the largest possible extent.
What do you propose? The death penalty for neck tattoos?
Why are you shits like this?
It is clear what he proposed as an answer to this question, yet you feign ignorance and ask the question anyways. The penalty for a neck tattoo is that you fend for yourself.
The reason that you feigned ignorance is because you dont like where this thought process is leading but dont have a good argument as to why things shouldnt lead there, but you really really really want to have such an argument. So here you are feigning ignorance and blathering on with the most extreme strawman you could muster. Your strawman is that the poster is suggesting DEATH TO NECK TATTOO OWNERS!!!!11!!11!
You are harmful to rational discourse because you arent rational and are intentionally dishonest. Yes I am saying your feigning ignorance was intentional. You are a dishonest fuck. Go fuck yourself.
Slashdot Mirror
Methinks you don't understand how 'magic' works.
You think wrong.
Since it is inside the file, it is far harder to change than a simple rename operation.
Luckily it doesnt work the way *you* think it should. Wrong thinking seems to be a pattern with you, tho.
UNIX systems have used "magic" for decades, and try to identify based on the actual file contents instead of its name.
That sounds terrible.
And then Microsoft came along, decided the extension was magic and reliable
Better to use the file extension than it is to load and execute dancingbunny.png.
They'll just make sure the people with least seniority get fired first.
As a member of a union, I can attest to this. Unions exist to protect the most senior, and its not just during layoffs. Everything goes by seniority once you unionize.
People keep saying that unions were demonized by republicans or whatever... wrong. They are demonized by themselves.
Doctor and Lawyer salaries are through the roof because those are two of very few jobs that can not be outsourced to a third world country.
Yep, it has nothing to do with the intentional artificial scarcity created by the AMA and BAR associations.
Both, because it's society as a whole.
In society, is it the men or the women? Dont avoid answering questions just because its uncomfortable. You claim both and we know its not true. Men don't give a shit about colors.
No man is an island
This is exactly what someone says when they are trying to take away someones liberty.
Wait...government is violence? And then you respond with such a violent tone?
Yes, and its not a violent tone. Its a promise. Let me repeat this one more time. You. Do. Not. Get. To. Fuck. Up. My. Kids.
You do NOT get to be a self absorbed asshole who fucks things up for everyone else.
I am fucking things up for you, ....by not letting you fuck up my kids?
See right here is your agenda in full nakedness. You are so self-righteous that you think that you know best for everyone else.
Let me repeat my promise and this is not a fucking joke. If you try to fuck up my kids I will fucking kill you. Remember that when you are trying to push one of your feel-good initiatives via government. People like me are legion. There is no corner of this country where you wont find someone who will fucking kill you if you fuck with their kids.
You know, like how boys are blue, girls are pink.
Is it men, or women, that are perpetuating this?
Or boys play with action figures of soldiers and astronauts and whatnot, while girls play with barbies and miniature houses.
This has of course been studied more than once on children before they could have been coerced by social stereotypes. You do know what the results of these studies were, right?
Girls ARE actively discouraged from pursuing careers in science and technology as they're more "masculine" occupations and steered towards more "feminine" occupations like teacher and nurse.
Who is doing the "active" discouraging?
I have an idea. You raise your kids, and I'll raise mine. If you fuck your kids up thats your business. If I fuck my kids up thats my business. If you ever try to tell me how to raise my kids I'll tell you to STFU, and if you ever try to force it through government coercion (violence) then I'll fucking kill you. If your kids try the same I'll kill them too. You do not get to fuck up my kids. Period.
You voted yourself up with your sock puppets, then more people than you have sock puppets modded you down. Deal with it. The system is designed to prevent you from gaming it. Its not unfair. You are just stupid.
I have been in the trenches for decades and for the most part professionals don't act like jerks.
Then there is no need for a code of conduct.
I think the real problem here is that people like you do not know what these social justice warriors are talking about.
They are talking about being able to take offense at whatever the hell they want. Statements such as "even my grandmother could use it" will be used against you, but only when they decide that you are next.
for light hearted technical information.
This is very offensive to people with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Its a medical condition and out of their control. You should be banned from the internet you insensitive neanderthal.
Anyone got the DOCS on this guy? Lets get him fired.
Greenland ice is not growing. In fact the decline in volume is accelerating
They said the same thing about Antarctic ice volume. Repeatedly. They were even saying it after those alarmists got themselves stuck in the growing ice in 2013 and needed an international rescue effort. They were saying it until this week.
What I can;t stand is the implication that republicans are somehow better.
There was no such implication, therefore we know something about you.
Looks like a list of the American Far Left to me.
Liberals are all about freedom, expression, tolerance, etc. until you do or say something that they don't like.
Democrats are Opposite People. Whatever they are saying is always the opposite of what they actually do in practice. Hell, look at what they were saying about health insurance and then look at what they did to health insurance. 100% opposite. Then look at who they blame for what they did to health insurance and how the House and Senate votes actually went. 100% opposite.
Its true for every single topic. These are the least generous of the two parties complaining about how selfish the other party is. They are the party that focuses on skin color while calling the other party racists. They are the party of womanizers complaining that the other party is sexist. They are the party of tax cheats complaining that the other party dodges taxes. They are the party that continually insisted that there wasn't a housing bubble and then blamed the other party for the housing bubble when it burst. They are the anti-vaxxers complaining that the other party is anti-science.
They are completely despicable.
Just because you see some soi-disant "liberals" touting the political correctness line doesn't mean they're liberals.
So Not True Scotsman's?
Its like the politician that cheats on his taxes campaigning on how bad it is that all the rich people are cheating on their taxes, the politician involved in black market arms dealing saying we need stricter gun control because its too easy to get guns, or the least generous political party complaining about how selfish they imagine that the most generous political party is.
The term in America is simply "projection." And if you havent picked up what I am putting down here, its Democrats.
I have first aid training and am a fire fighter.
After reading your posts, one of two things is true:
(a) You are lying.
(b) You should be fired.
Either way, STFU.
That's your problem. Accurate information is almost never available in news stories.
and making stuff up is better than reported information?
Translation: I am biased and choosing to stick my head in the sand on this issue.
It's not about you. Because you don't experience it or care doesn't mean it can be ignored or dismissed.
Actually it does mean I can ignore or dismiss it.
I am responsible for me. You are responsible for you. Don't tell me I have to also be responsible for you, because thats fucking evil slavery you slaver asshole.
it is generally pretty likely that the implied probabilities determined by a balanced book are pretty good representations of the actual probabilities of the team success.
unless its a local team.. in which case the betting is so lopsided that balancing the action results in such extreme odds that few bettors wish to place any wagers on either side, because they are fans and wont bet against "their favorite team" no matter what the odds. ..in these cases the local bookie gets in touch with a bookie local to the other team and they pool up the action so that the odds they need to offer arent so extreme.
you've probably paid closer to $819.67. That's a pretty good deal for 17 years of space station.
Notice how this defender of the space station has decided to measure the benefit that the space station has given us by counting the years that it been up, rather than by counting the benefit the space station has given us.
Amazing how fucking fanboys can rationalize pretty much anything by throwing out meaningless numbers.
I've linked to the "Basic" explanation, but there Intermediate and Advanced explanations that go into more detail.
In fact, your link exactly echoes what he said:
Basic: "The "decline" refers to a decline in northern tree-rings..."
What the GP brought up is that these tree rings are trusted as proxies for measuring historic temperature, but for a fact (a fact so strong that it must be 'hidden') modern tree ring growth does not correlate with modern temperature measurements..
This undermines almost all the AGW climate science because all the AGW climate science requires those tree rings to show how much cooler it was in the past.
Advanced: "It actually refers to a decline in tree growth at certain high-latitude locations. This decline began in the 1960s when tree-ring proxies diverged from the temperature record."
They claim that this decline began in the 1960s, and its just coincidental that the timing correlates to when we started getting good first-hand temperature data of the entire planet via satellites.
You mean, right-wing bald-faced lies about Mann.
You are clearly a denier and should be investigated with RICO.
You wanted the opposition to AGW to be investigated with RICO? Well I want the climate scientists investigated with RICO.
You didnt answer the question. Where do you think this will end?
Money has to keep moving or civilization collapses, and when you guys that turn the screws and get ALL the money keep it, it gets sucked out of the economy and stuck in the Cayman Islands or some such place.
What a bunch of shit. All you armchair economists focus on the currency and because of that you come up with insane conclusions.
The facts are that an average person will always be able to trade a day of their labor for a day of another average persons labor.
See how I took "money" out of it and destroyed your argument?
Economics is not about money. Economics is about the allocation of resources.
You probably measure wealth in money too. Sorry pal. The measure of a mans wealth is the measure of the goods as services the man enjoys, not the enumeration of his money.
Pro-tip: If your argument about economics relies on there being "money" then its a flawed argument. The degree to which it is flawed depends on the degree to which you must depart from what money represents in order to make the argument.
Your argument required the largest possible departure from what money represents. Your argument is therefore flawed to the largest possible extent.
What do you propose? The death penalty for neck tattoos?
Why are you shits like this?
It is clear what he proposed as an answer to this question, yet you feign ignorance and ask the question anyways. The penalty for a neck tattoo is that you fend for yourself.
The reason that you feigned ignorance is because you dont like where this thought process is leading but dont have a good argument as to why things shouldnt lead there, but you really really really want to have such an argument. So here you are feigning ignorance and blathering on with the most extreme strawman you could muster. Your strawman is that the poster is suggesting DEATH TO NECK TATTOO OWNERS!!!!11!!11!
You are harmful to rational discourse because you arent rational and are intentionally dishonest. Yes I am saying your feigning ignorance was intentional. You are a dishonest fuck. Go fuck yourself.
You are just an ignorant fuck that likes to pretend that he knows something, even when you know exactly zero.
It's unlikely we even know all the different types of neurons that exist.
There are 8 types you ignorant fuck.