Doesn't matter. That district will still be the target for "redistricting" because of racism in state government.
The only racist in evidence here is PopeRatzo (965947) who not only doesn't think that blacks can be republicans, but also thinks that blacks want their own segregated voting district.
Segregation supported by a Democrat. They just don't change.
and if you're black, you can expect to have your congressional district gerrymandered into the neighboring four Republican districts, thus diminishing your vote.
..because black people can't be republican.
I've got an idea, you racist fuck. Just fucking die.
No it wasn't, that law did not get written until after she was no longer Secretary of State.
No laws about taking classified information home with you? Lets say we buy your version of the laws..
...to get to this point, she also had to have that same classified information in her home, after she left the position.
Are you saying thats also not illegal you fucking shill?
Imagine for a moment that someone breaks into George Bush's summer retreat and finds classified material today in 2015. You would be 100% for sure telling us all about how god damned illegal that is for Bush to have that material, and how much of a hero the guy who broke in and found it was.
Its probably based on a negative income tax, which I support so long as its tied with a flat tax rate.
Key advantages include no need for minimum wage laws (the one and only exemption is a disincentive against low wages), is automatically progressive, is dead-simple, and eliminates the need for welfare programs.
The only tunable parameters are the tax rate, the exemption amount, and the exemption rate. This of course doesnt allow politicians to reward and/or punish, so they will never support it without corrupting it with additional shit.
It common sense to think that a flying something over someones property too high and too briefly to be taking pictures would be ignored by any rational human being.
yes, thats true. Too bad thats not at all what this case is about. Did you miss the part where the guy shot it down with birdshot which means that it was neither too high nor too brief?
Yeah... you just dont want to face the facts of the case, which is why you lie about them.
No, he made a valid point that you seem unable to refute.
If he had a valid point it wouldnt apply to both taxis and ubers... but wait.. he was just hand waving and tried to pretend that it only applied to uber...
I was in Barnes and Nobles last week and passed by the children's book section. One side was labeled boys books and had books about trains, cars and plane. The other was labeled girls books and was about princesses, fashion and poneys.
You seem to think the B&N is trying to create a divide between the genders, when in reality it is just accepting and tolerant of the differences that already exists.
Any alarm about there being both a boys and girls section at B&N is just your intolerance showing through. You seem to be unwilling to tolerate a difference between boys and girls.
When it comes right down to it, there are two primary reasons why a large company would not have a more or less proportional population of diverse worker.
1) straight up racism - but we are told that corporations are greedy to a fault, not racist.
2) cultural differences - but to change this you must argue that cultural differences (aka diversity) is wrong, which is racism.
The idea that Apple or Google is racist is clearly absurd, so we are left with those criticizing Apple and Google as actually being the racists that demonstrably believe that some peoples cultures are wrong. They clearly are arguing that Black culture is wrong for not being nerdy enough, that Asian culture is wrong for being too nerdy, etc. So much for diversity.
TA portrays Thalidomide as a simple case of 'superior' FDA gate-keeping in the United States that prevented a harmful drug from reaching the market, a drug company dismissing (with hubris implied) what turned out to be serious danger.
The thing is that we did have superior FDA gate-keeping. While Europe was worried about efficacy we (our FDA) at the time only cared about safety. Thalidomide passed the efficacy test with flying colors. It worked very well. It just wasn't very safe.
The sad thing is that it was this event that was used as an excuse to transform the FDA into regulating efficacy, the very thing that would not have prevented thalidomide from being sold (see Europe.) Since then, safety has taken a back seat. We are lesser because of it. The Statists shouted "think of the children" and corrupted another department of government. Now nearly all drugs come with a huge list of unsafe side-effects, but at least they "work."
The FDA would absolutely approve thalidomide today.
If you ask people to choose among candidates they don't know, and then manipulate the information sources that are available to them, what in the world would make you think that their opinions should remain random?
Clearly the world of Democrats, who apparently wouldnt change their opinion about candidates they were originally uninformed about, regardless of what information you then gave them.
Some stations consumed certain items to make others so over time their stock levels would drop and they would offer more and more money to restock.
Yet the price of what those stations produced didnt reflect the prices of the raw materials needed, and stations making what should be large profits just swallow the money into oblivion, and when stations should be out of money they magically have an endless supply anyways.
The elephant in the room is that its not an economy. In an economy the actors are each trying to benefit from their transactions, most transactions are wins for both parties, consequences when they aren't, motivation to eliminate losses, motivation to reinvest gains, and so on. Thats just not happening in these A.I. economies. Its not even close.
Now, I am a firm believer in duck theory. It doesnt have to work at all like a real economy, all it has to do is look like it does. But again these games fail for the same reasons I pointed out above.
The best simulated economy in a game that I am aware of was in Capitalism II released over 15 years ago, and even that had serious flaws, but at least the competing A.I. CEO's could go broke and tried not to.
With an evil misogynist at one end, and a crying feminist at the other. I think their head would explode trying to decide which was the more important issue to address.
Slashdot Mirror
Note he stated speeds in GBps instead of GB/s, which are different by a little over an order of magnitude.
Now you are confusing GBps with Gbps.
save a 5GB file in under 3 seconds
1.8GB/s x 3s = 5.4GB
Read speeds are up to 5.5GBps. Write speeds are up to 1.8GBps.
Your fast reads are impressive too, but you failed the comprehension benchmark.
fucking dumb much?
Doesn't matter. That district will still be the target for "redistricting" because of racism in state government.
The only racist in evidence here is PopeRatzo (965947) who not only doesn't think that blacks can be republicans, but also thinks that blacks want their own segregated voting district.
Segregation supported by a Democrat. They just don't change.
and if you're black, you can expect to have your congressional district gerrymandered into the neighboring four Republican districts, thus diminishing your vote.
I've got an idea, you racist fuck. Just fucking die.
How does that follow, was the server kept in her home?
She stated that the server was guarded by her secret service attachment. Hilary woudnt lie.. it must be in her home.
Notice how she made sure that you cant win this argument? Yeah....
No it wasn't, that law did not get written until after she was no longer Secretary of State.
No laws about taking classified information home with you? Lets say we buy your version of the laws..
...to get to this point, she also had to have that same classified information in her home, after she left the position.
Are you saying thats also not illegal you fucking shill?
Imagine for a moment that someone breaks into George Bush's summer retreat and finds classified material today in 2015. You would be 100% for sure telling us all about how god damned illegal that is for Bush to have that material, and how much of a hero the guy who broke in and found it was.
Its probably based on a negative income tax, which I support so long as its tied with a flat tax rate.
Key advantages include no need for minimum wage laws (the one and only exemption is a disincentive against low wages), is automatically progressive, is dead-simple, and eliminates the need for welfare programs.
The only tunable parameters are the tax rate, the exemption amount, and the exemption rate. This of course doesnt allow politicians to reward and/or punish, so they will never support it without corrupting it with additional shit.
It common sense to think that a flying something over someones property too high and too briefly to be taking pictures would be ignored by any rational human being.
yes, thats true. Too bad thats not at all what this case is about. Did you miss the part where the guy shot it down with birdshot which means that it was neither too high nor too brief?
Yeah... you just dont want to face the facts of the case, which is why you lie about them.
Its common sense to think that you can fly things with a camera over someones private property, particularly a home, and expect no consequences?
Everybody please notice how the liberals are all of a sudden libertarians as soon as there is a chance to argue against guns.
Is that really all it takes to upset you?
Yes.
Cope with it, spy boy.
^^this
...forced to take down the content regardless of the merits...
required by law.
... Vimeo to reactivate the content.
not required by law
Vimeo is required to remove content, but is never required to restore content.
No, he made a valid point that you seem unable to refute.
If he had a valid point it wouldnt apply to both taxis and ubers... but wait.. he was just hand waving and tried to pretend that it only applied to uber...
yeah...
I was in Barnes and Nobles last week and passed by the children's book section. One side was labeled boys books and had books about trains, cars and plane. The other was labeled girls books and was about princesses, fashion and poneys.
You seem to think the B&N is trying to create a divide between the genders, when in reality it is just accepting and tolerant of the differences that already exists.
Any alarm about there being both a boys and girls section at B&N is just your intolerance showing through. You seem to be unwilling to tolerate a difference between boys and girls.
When it comes right down to it, there are two primary reasons why a large company would not have a more or less proportional population of diverse worker.
1) straight up racism - but we are told that corporations are greedy to a fault, not racist.
2) cultural differences - but to change this you must argue that cultural differences (aka diversity) is wrong, which is racism.
The idea that Apple or Google is racist is clearly absurd, so we are left with those criticizing Apple and Google as actually being the racists that demonstrably believe that some peoples cultures are wrong. They clearly are arguing that Black culture is wrong for not being nerdy enough, that Asian culture is wrong for being too nerdy, etc. So much for diversity.
American Liberalism is racism.
TA portrays Thalidomide as a simple case of 'superior' FDA gate-keeping in the United States that prevented a harmful drug from reaching the market, a drug company dismissing (with hubris implied) what turned out to be serious danger.
The thing is that we did have superior FDA gate-keeping. While Europe was worried about efficacy we (our FDA) at the time only cared about safety. Thalidomide passed the efficacy test with flying colors. It worked very well. It just wasn't very safe.
The sad thing is that it was this event that was used as an excuse to transform the FDA into regulating efficacy, the very thing that would not have prevented thalidomide from being sold (see Europe.) Since then, safety has taken a back seat. We are lesser because of it. The Statists shouted "think of the children" and corrupted another department of government. Now nearly all drugs come with a huge list of unsafe side-effects, but at least they "work."
The FDA would absolutely approve thalidomide today.
If you ask people to choose among candidates they don't know, and then manipulate the information sources that are available to them, what in the world would make you think that their opinions should remain random?
Clearly the world of Democrats, who apparently wouldnt change their opinion about candidates they were originally uninformed about, regardless of what information you then gave them.
Who are these "many"? Horrible journalism.
Probably talking about people like me, who have saved many hours of effort multiple times per year since discovering it over a decade ago.
He doesnt understand the question. He thinks money is free.
Calling something with 3 BITS that has 8 LEVELS triple level is silly.
Especially since it only has 7 threshold levels... which was clearly explained to you hours before you made this reply. Typo, or dumbo?
Some stations consumed certain items to make others so over time their stock levels would drop and they would offer more and more money to restock.
Yet the price of what those stations produced didnt reflect the prices of the raw materials needed, and stations making what should be large profits just swallow the money into oblivion, and when stations should be out of money they magically have an endless supply anyways.
The elephant in the room is that its not an economy. In an economy the actors are each trying to benefit from their transactions, most transactions are wins for both parties, consequences when they aren't, motivation to eliminate losses, motivation to reinvest gains, and so on. Thats just not happening in these A.I. economies. Its not even close.
Now, I am a firm believer in duck theory. It doesnt have to work at all like a real economy, all it has to do is look like it does. But again these games fail for the same reasons I pointed out above.
The best simulated economy in a game that I am aware of was in Capitalism II released over 15 years ago, and even that had serious flaws, but at least the competing A.I. CEO's could go broke and tried not to.
3 levels is not the same as three bits.
You had posted that you just discovered that it is, and now you are posting that it isn't. Make up your mind.
AC poster is right. You must have thought that SLC stored 0 bits since it had only 1 possible "level."
Makes perfect sense to me. Maybe its because I understand binary.
It is basically just small vibrations that travels through your bones in your body
Anything that is vibrating while within the atmosphere is making sound by definition.
Putting SJWs into cages?
With an evil misogynist at one end, and a crying feminist at the other. I think their head would explode trying to decide which was the more important issue to address.