I saw the light suits in use at a Blue Man show a year or two ago. Even in the nose-bleed seats they looked laser-light-show good. So if they wanted old Tron level glow I'm sure it could have been done. But I didn't mind as the suits fit with the rest of the scenery.
Well men don't really have anywhere near the options women do in most dress codes (and men's clothes generally don't have clevage/cut/hemline issues) so it follows that most of the dress code would be about what the women can and can't do.
Automobiles really went down hill after they replaced the tiller and manually adjusted carburetors. Now any idiot (with no servants to walk in front carrying flags) can operate a horseless carriage!
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem."
Actually, if you're not part of the solution you are part of the precipitate. Saying someone is either part of the solution (x)or part of the problem ignores people that are completely neutral to the situation. Of course narrow-mindedness and binary thinking is the new enlightened so maybe I should just get with the times.
If it's not bullying then why all the hype about upcoming releases and the insurance file? Why not just do what they are theoretically supposed to be doing an release them without all the grandstanding and saber rattling?
Ahh, the old "It isn't violence if it isn't physical". I'd expect as much from people who have twisted stealing similarly when it eases their conscience.
And their demand is making the other makers play the "me too" game.
Why anyone would want a V-twin shakemonster over a smooth-as-glass boxer engine is beyond me, but apparently enough people want the rumble so Honda dropped the Valkyrie for the VTX.
The rise of Wal-Mart is a sign that when people are exposed to the Sam Vimes theory of boots they don't go "wow, you can save money by being rich by being able to buy the $50 boots that last ten times longer" and instead go "wow, you can buy boots for $10".
"Then why are jurors ever permitted to be educated adults?" Perhaps so that they can use their prior knowledge and experience in interpreting the evidence presented to them?
"What is the difference between looking up and knowing a definition prior to the trial and looking up and learning it during" One is before the trial, the other is during. That is the difference. The court is responsible for presenting evidence during the trial so they don't like someone going off and gathering their own that hasn't been run past them first. Whatever a person brings with them is screened before they are admitted to the jury. If either side has an issue with them they are not picked for the jury. Once on the jury the court has to control the evidence.
Ouch, bad thing to say around here. Someone in charge is someone that call tell you what to do and the groupthink here says that's a bad thing. The only thing that can tell you what to do is the GPL and only because that is the word of RMS (blessed be his beard).
Considering that many here demand to get noise they barely consider music (and don't even like it) for free the person that copied your work and gave it away for free would be lauded as a hero of the people.
I pay for many services I could normally get for free. Both because I want to reward them monetarily and because I wish to use their services in the future which necessitates their continued existence.
Slashdot Mirror
I saw the light suits in use at a Blue Man show a year or two ago. Even in the nose-bleed seats they looked laser-light-show good. So if they wanted old Tron level glow I'm sure it could have been done. But I didn't mind as the suits fit with the rest of the scenery.
Option B: Get yourself tested after waiting long enough for the disease to have a chance to show up on the test.
If you find out a partner has had tests you get the results instantly. Some things have an incubation period.
Well men don't really have anywhere near the options women do in most dress codes (and men's clothes generally don't have clevage/cut/hemline issues) so it follows that most of the dress code would be about what the women can and can't do.
Automobiles really went down hill after they replaced the tiller and manually adjusted carburetors. Now any idiot (with no servants to walk in front carrying flags) can operate a horseless carriage!
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem."
Actually, if you're not part of the solution you are part of the precipitate. Saying someone is either part of the solution (x)or part of the problem ignores people that are completely neutral to the situation. Of course narrow-mindedness and binary thinking is the new enlightened so maybe I should just get with the times.
If it's not bullying then why all the hype about upcoming releases and the insurance file? Why not just do what they are theoretically supposed to be doing an release them without all the grandstanding and saber rattling?
Ahh, the old "It isn't violence if it isn't physical". I'd expect as much from people who have twisted stealing similarly when it eases their conscience.
*Tries* to DDoS them.
Their attempt at Amazon went so well that they said they never tried it in the first place.
And don't forget the damning one about Medvedev being Robin to Putin's Batman. That one really exposed the corruption in our government.
Inferred, not missed. The main point was Wal-Mart people buy only on price.
So Achilles can never catch the tortoise?
And by boxer I mean horizontally-opposed. Not that /. is full of pedants...
And their demand is making the other makers play the "me too" game.
Why anyone would want a V-twin shakemonster over a smooth-as-glass boxer engine is beyond me, but apparently enough people want the rumble so Honda dropped the Valkyrie for the VTX.
The rise of Wal-Mart is a sign that when people are exposed to the Sam Vimes theory of boots they don't go "wow, you can save money by being rich by being able to buy the $50 boots that last ten times longer" and instead go "wow, you can buy boots for $10".
"Then why are jurors ever permitted to be educated adults?"
Perhaps so that they can use their prior knowledge and experience in interpreting the evidence presented to them?
"What is the difference between looking up and knowing a definition prior to the trial and looking up and learning it during"
One is before the trial, the other is during. That is the difference. The court is responsible for presenting evidence during the trial so they don't like someone going off and gathering their own that hasn't been run past them first. Whatever a person brings with them is screened before they are admitted to the jury. If either side has an issue with them they are not picked for the jury. Once on the jury the court has to control the evidence.
"No but the judge is in charge."
Ouch, bad thing to say around here. Someone in charge is someone that call tell you what to do and the groupthink here says that's a bad thing. The only thing that can tell you what to do is the GPL and only because that is the word of RMS (blessed be his beard).
It's a "we didn't lose, they cheated" thing.
Considering that many here demand to get noise they barely consider music (and don't even like it) for free the person that copied your work and gave it away for free would be lauded as a hero of the people.
Some ip addresses and MACs won't be spoofed. Someone will slip up. And then that everyone shrinks to someone.
With all the hype they should really drop the humble.
I pay for many services I could normally get for free. Both because I want to reward them monetarily and because I wish to use their services in the future which necessitates their continued existence.
The examples were deemed original research and non-notable thus flagged for speedy deletion.
So it's like how the Tea Party doesn't exist because there's no central leadership?
Scotland Yard is probably interested in if someone *was* in Anonymous, which can't be changed on a whim.
Leaking documents that are equivalent to "Water is wet, the sky is blue, and fire is hot." is not productive.
How about if I say Assange is an egomaniac and Palin, Liberman, and every other politician at the federal level are all egomaniacs? Is that better?
Wikileaks should stop Assange's little feud with the US and get back to doing something productive.