Wait, I don't get it. How was he wrong? The overflow doesn't happen in newer versions of IE, and it could also be argued that IE is one of the "bigger" programs at a higher risk, as it is not "simpler network code".
It's interesting that the article even points out the Keck, which not only can see the object, but made a more accurate assesment of the galaxy's red-shift. Is there anything the Hubble can do that Keck can't?
Re:Oh, you had to do it....
on
WB Cancels Angel
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Forget Farscape, what about Firefly?!?? (another show by the Angel director, with fan base that took out a full-page ad to try to get it back, canceled after 11 shows.)
My wife tells me all the time that this goes back to Women's Lib... All the women wanted to work, to be equal, etc. etc. Well, now the economy is geared for a two-income family-- it's expected.
We've been able to get by on just my income so she can raise our three kids... but it can be tough.
Not meant as a troll, just passing on one female's perspective.
Actually, yes. First google hit. Sadly (?), I didn't realize what the boat was until I had done the search... I thought maybe it was some lost war machine.
If such a simple thing as an elementary CA can give rise to universal computation, then universal computation and (most importantly) undecidability must be ubiquitous in nature. The world is fundamentally non-integrable and non-predictible.
I don't understand how it's proved "ubiquitous in nature." What's to keep it from being "ubiquitous in base-10"? How do we know this isn't a construct imposed by our rational thinking and arbritrary number systems, rather than a fundamental element of nature itself?
I know this was meant as a joke, but it appears that the printer/photoshop/copier/scanner people don't really care about false positives, while the vending machine people definitely would not want to identify a fake as real. If they used this technology, you would simply have to draw a few circles on a piece of paper to get your carbs.
Most digi-cams say that they are 3MP, but keep in mind that for any given pixel requires four elements (RGGB) to create. I believe the Spirit camera is only sensitive to light, and has interchangable filters (so it must make three passes to get full color) -- effectively tripling the "element count" of the sensor.
No kidding. In November I was able to get in on a great rebate deal at Circuit City, where I picked up.5TB of RAID-5 storage for $400 (including the $100 RAID card). At least that's level 5, instead of this level-0 non-redundant tripe.
Re:You know... things just don't amaze me.
on
Message in a Battle
·
· Score: 1
Keep in mind that, if this were to happen, you woud not realize that the actor you were watching was indeed computer generated. There may have been scenes that you are already "happy" with, but because the definition of quality is complete realism, you would not realize it.
I know I was thrown in Spiderman to find out that the entire wall-walking scene (the 1st one in the alley) was CG... I thought they did RL, with a CG transition 1/2 way through.
I've got a 10D, and it's great... but I started on an old Sears Chinon (manual everything, with a smidge of auto exposure). Film easily passes digital in quality, and is more flexible (IR, low-light films, etc). I would recommend practicing with a manual 35mm before jumping into digital... but do eventially jump into digital (The 10D makes incredibly detailed 13x19 prints).
I'm actually doing an Atkins/Hackers/Body-for-Life combination (protien/spreadsheet/portion size). I've lost 20lbs over the last two months, and feel great!
Actually, I read in an earlier article on this technology (can't find it now) that at least one envelope manufacturer was selling aluminium-lined envelopes, which effectively foil (haha) this technology.
At least our kids will be used to the idea when the government starts doing it to the populous. Trust me... it starts with the kids, and when they grow up to be politicians, they don't see what the big deal is.
In support of this, I thought that this article was rather enlightening, with a russian spacecraft expert saying that he did initially rule out the possibility of Kosmos 96, but that after further research determined that the Canadian impact could have been the booster, and this the actual satelite.
"A famous UFO case may actually involve a real U.S. government cover-up, but UFO buffs are on the wrong side. Instead of exposing the truth, they may be unwitting pawns in deception."
Slashdot Mirror
Always buy an 11-foot ladder. Perfect for straddling the perfectly 10-foot pits, and for climbing out ones you didn't spot.
Wait, I don't get it. How was he wrong? The overflow doesn't happen in newer versions of IE, and it could also be argued that IE is one of the "bigger" programs at a higher risk, as it is not "simpler network code".
It's interesting that the article even points out the Keck, which not only can see the object, but made a more accurate assesment of the galaxy's red-shift. Is there anything the Hubble can do that Keck can't?
Forget Farscape, what about Firefly?!??
(another show by the Angel director, with fan base that took out a full-page ad to try to get it back, canceled after 11 shows.)
Some changes, however, are actually for the better.
My wife tells me all the time that this goes back to Women's Lib... All the women wanted to work, to be equal, etc. etc. Well, now the economy is geared for a two-income family-- it's expected.
We've been able to get by on just my income so she can raise our three kids... but it can be tough.
Not meant as a troll, just passing on one female's perspective.
Actually, yes. First google hit. Sadly (?), I didn't realize what the boat was until I had done the search... I thought maybe it was some lost war machine.
If such a simple thing as an elementary CA can give rise to universal computation, then universal computation and (most importantly) undecidability must be ubiquitous in nature. The world is fundamentally non-integrable and non-predictible.
I don't understand how it's proved "ubiquitous in nature." What's to keep it from being "ubiquitous in base-10"? How do we know this isn't a construct imposed by our rational thinking and arbritrary number systems, rather than a fundamental element of nature itself?
Maybe this is a troll, but there were no known casualties: the blast took place "in the Siberian wilderness."
I don't know, maybe there were some reindeer around...
I know this was meant as a joke, but it appears that the printer/photoshop/copier/scanner people don't really care about false positives, while the vending machine people definitely would not want to identify a fake as real. If they used this technology, you would simply have to draw a few circles on a piece of paper to get your carbs.
Most digi-cams say that they are 3MP, but keep in mind that for any given pixel requires four elements (RGGB) to create. I believe the Spirit camera is only sensitive to light, and has interchangable filters (so it must make three passes to get full color) -- effectively tripling the "element count" of the sensor.
No kidding. In November I was able to get in on a great rebate deal at Circuit City, where I picked up .5TB of RAID-5 storage for $400 (including the $100 RAID card). At least that's level 5, instead of this level-0 non-redundant tripe.
Keep in mind that, if this were to happen, you woud not realize that the actor you were watching was indeed computer generated. There may have been scenes that you are already "happy" with, but because the definition of quality is complete realism, you would not realize it.
I know I was thrown in Spiderman to find out that the entire wall-walking scene (the 1st one in the alley) was CG... I thought they did RL, with a CG transition 1/2 way through.
Thanks. It was an IRC conversation between Sig11 and Taco.
Sig11 had been running an experiment, which Taco didn't take to kindly to.
Master Chief himself!
I've got a 10D, and it's great... but I started on an old Sears Chinon (manual everything, with a smidge of auto exposure). Film easily passes digital in quality, and is more flexible (IR, low-light films, etc). I would recommend practicing with a manual 35mm before jumping into digital... but do eventially jump into digital (The 10D makes incredibly detailed 13x19 prints).
Heisenberg may have been here.
I think I've had one person that got it.
You would be more familiar with the Coffee Cam.
I think you've pretty much guaranteed that inorganic LED technology will now prevail, thanks to the fact that "It's impossible." :)
I've had the TDK 840G for a week or so, but no one carries the 8x media. In fact, production isn't even supposed to start for another month or two.
I'm actually doing an Atkins/Hackers/Body-for-Life combination (protien/spreadsheet/portion size). I've lost 20lbs over the last two months, and feel great!
And how many journals would contain references to the person that made the leap to farming?
Actually, I read in an earlier article on this technology (can't find it now) that at least one envelope manufacturer was selling aluminium-lined envelopes, which effectively foil (haha) this technology.
At least our kids will be used to the idea when the government starts doing it to the populous. Trust me... it starts with the kids, and when they grow up to be politicians, they don't see what the big deal is.
In support of this, I thought that this article was rather enlightening, with a russian spacecraft expert saying that he did initially rule out the possibility of Kosmos 96, but that after further research determined that the Canadian impact could have been the booster, and this the actual satelite.
"A famous UFO case may actually involve a real U.S. government cover-up, but UFO buffs are on the wrong side. Instead of exposing the truth, they may be unwitting pawns in deception."