is scrutiny from A better and/or more reliable than from B?
will multiple scrutinizers provide better data just because they're *more*?
my position is: inviting more to the party invites more of absolutely everything.
Scrooge McDuck here: if i can't own it and hold it while i count it and then weigh it before storing it in my safe, then i don't accept it. all y'all go ahead.
so socialism is a retort to capitalism.
ok. i get that. if wealth concentrates
into ever fewer hands, maybe they
WIN. maybe they Deserve It. maybe
socialism is a "we can't win" didactit.
if we go 'off the grid': that's a special qualification.
bottom line: do the very least 'on the grid' and most
of everything else off. throw the dogs off.
the sponsor which pays for the broadcast paints over the stadium
ads for the sponsor's competition. for example: in an auto
race, the TV sponsor, Budweiser, paints the Miller car.
it makes us all of that.
good/bad/ugly.
we're all that.
bring everything to the table
and present your side with evidence.
convince a sample of the population.
yes, it's been done before.
1. some folks see the camera/microphone and 'clam up': stage fright. 2. other people are very protective of their words/image (politicians, preachers, bloggers).
3. as for me, no. i've been recorded. the result was factual and awful.
Slashdot Mirror
is scrutiny from A better and/or more reliable than from B? will multiple scrutinizers provide better data just because they're *more*? my position is: inviting more to the party invites more of absolutely everything.
Lane paves HP's path to a Kodak moment.
Scrooge McDuck here: if i can't own it and hold it while i count it and then weigh it before storing it in my safe, then i don't accept it. all y'all go ahead.
Undefeated.
maybe the taxpayers are paying for this?
POtential is the new PROfiling. care because your online friend is Your Profile.
so socialism is a retort to capitalism. ok. i get that. if wealth concentrates into ever fewer hands, maybe they WIN. maybe they Deserve It. maybe socialism is a "we can't win" didactit.
if we go 'off the grid': that's a special qualification. bottom line: do the very least 'on the grid' and most of everything else off. throw the dogs off.
the sponsor which pays for the broadcast paints over the stadium ads for the sponsor's competition. for example: in an auto race, the TV sponsor, Budweiser, paints the Miller car.
young people into consideration. i really don't like what these old guys..... Iron Age/Bronze Age/Stone....etc.
yes, Simpsons derivation.
nah, nah. boo, boo.
why are they a special class? and how to tell the difference? do blogs count?
just imagine an integral shock absorbing modular skull. of course, a helmet protects more than the brain, but this is good news. i needed some.
life finds a way.
it's all the same to us. USA rocks!
it makes us all of that. good/bad/ugly. we're all that. bring everything to the table and present your side with evidence. convince a sample of the population. yes, it's been done before.
zero is the number.
prototypes at Kinkos, then large-scale in the garage. or vice-versa.
1. some folks see the camera/microphone and 'clam up': stage fright. 2. other people are very protective of their words/image (politicians, preachers, bloggers). 3. as for me, no. i've been recorded. the result was factual and awful.
remote monks....well you get the idea... then Central Church Control...and all that.... my point being: dis ain't a new thang.
hey! they admit it. newspapers and movies.
y'all just add to the hype.
yeah. Fred Brooks handled that last millennium.
after my wife returned from China, and told me about the red air, it seems like a possibility now.