Perhaps, the 9.3 people per square mile contributes to that. and it had a murder rate per 100,000 people of 1.9 in 2007 with a population of 640,000 many dense suburban areas with heavy gun controls see similar rates
No, a trial is where they determine innocence of guilt with the assumption of innocence. An officer of the law only needs reasonable suspicion. A judge granting a warrant only has to believe that legally valid evidence is present. A grand jury only has to say this evidence could mean he did it. Only at the trial phase is guilt the question at hand. I am not a lawyer, but i play one on slashdot.
While the private school may be more efficient, it really isn't a fair comparison. Private schools can cherry pick students and avoid ones that add costs or just difficulties. Consider the cost of one student with moderate learning disabilities. It will be a hell of a lot more expensive to educate them than to than it will be to educate a healthy student. A private school can be more selective. A public school has to take any kid in the area.
Name a major city without any gang violence. Sure it can be reduced to background noise levels, but it will always be there. So you are right they are similar and perhaps taking draconian measures to prevent either is silly.
We need either trials, releases, or conditions under which this war could be won or lost. i would rather have a few nuts running loose killing people than a massive erosion of the concept of due process.
We have no way to win a war on terrorism. It is a tactic, not an enemy. Holding someone until the end of hostilities with no charges in an endless war is a pretty bad idea.
Perhaps he stole at a retail level.
Perhaps, the 9.3 people per square mile contributes to that. and it had a murder rate per 100,000 people of 1.9 in 2007 with a population of 640,000 many dense suburban areas with heavy gun controls see similar rates
Yes, but they couldn't even agree on whether the supreme court should be doing that. Look at Marbury vs. Madison.
http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4873.html
In many places the fact that the weed was in two bags can make any amount intent to distribute.
No, a trial is where they determine innocence of guilt with the assumption of innocence. An officer of the law only needs reasonable suspicion. A judge granting a warrant only has to believe that legally valid evidence is present. A grand jury only has to say this evidence could mean he did it. Only at the trial phase is guilt the question at hand. I am not a lawyer, but i play one on slashdot.
A good lawyer is one you can contact at 10:00 on a Tuesday if needed.
While the private school may be more efficient, it really isn't a fair comparison. Private schools can cherry pick students and avoid ones that add costs or just difficulties. Consider the cost of one student with moderate learning disabilities. It will be a hell of a lot more expensive to educate them than to than it will be to educate a healthy student. A private school can be more selective. A public school has to take any kid in the area.
Anything over $250= getting ripped off in Cleveland.
Get an herb dryer or turn on the oven at low heat with the door open.
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/tinker.html The supreme court disagrees.
or at that point get your own magical copy machine and stop worrying about money
Name a major city without any gang violence. Sure it can be reduced to background noise levels, but it will always be there. So you are right they are similar and perhaps taking draconian measures to prevent either is silly.
I was unaware I had also been stealing cars and computer chips. I need to lay off the Ambien.
rural hospitals
We need either trials, releases, or conditions under which this war could be won or lost. i would rather have a few nuts running loose killing people than a massive erosion of the concept of due process.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_streetcar_scandal
We have no way to win a war on terrorism. It is a tactic, not an enemy. Holding someone until the end of hostilities with no charges in an endless war is a pretty bad idea.
Yes.
Health and safety codes can only verify sanitation at the time of inspection. It may have even been unsanitary at the time of the visit.
Cashiers usually still know how to add up your purchase, but are often forbidden because the registers are tied to the inventory system.
I can live with it too, but to say the risk is not there is not accurate.
So we are all guilty of negligent manslaughter?
Intimidation while at home is still a risk.
I feel anonymity should be encouraged. Widespread use makes one person who is unwilling to give out their name for a damn good reason less noteworthy.