No, not only counting POWs. It happened on a smaller scale and is less talked about, but there were a large number of US citizens of German descent in internment camps.
About 11,000 people of German descent were placed in internment camps. We also provided the internment facilities for several Latin American countries.
Leaving out the second part of that sentence alters the meaning. The are reasons for, like catching criminals, and reasons against, like creating an overbearing police state with no regard for citizen privacy. You can't do a cost benefit analysis if you won't look at the costs and benefits.
I think you may be way off base with the Midwest comment. Remember the Midwest is home to the Cleveland and Mayo Clinics. Neither of those have been slacking in the electronic health records area.
Even a lot of the Facebook junkies I've met have a personal line they draw around some medical information wher it won't be divulged publicly. They might tell the world about smoking a bowl and downing a fifth of whiskey before grandma's funeral, but they are a lot less likely to mention a positive STD test.
If you think there aren't waiting lists and rationing of care under the US system you are missing out on what life is like for a huge chunk of the country.
That may be true for some, and maybe even all of the submitters, but we don't know that. All we know about the submitters' motivation is that they chose Wikileaks. They may have chosen them simply because they are the best known leak outlet, or they may have chosen them because they love the picture of Assange on the main page. They bought into the game at one price, it isn't my place, your place, or DB's place to change the rules of that wager.
DB looks pretty bad if he leaks the material anyway. People who submitted that information chose to submit it to Wikileaks. It would be a breach of their trust on his part to use any of that information.
The problem is that those organizations have been given a long enough leash that passing a law and cutting funding isn't sufficient. Look at the whole mess with the CIA and the Contras. A law was passed saying don't do that and the CIA kept on humming along. When an agency of the government can continue its operations against US law and without traditional funding sources there is no legislative leverage left. Without the ability to control those organizations there is no representative input.
You become responsible when you had a reasonable belief that an investigation was coming. If you destroy it while no one would expect an investigation you aren't guilty of that crime.
8 pounds of garbage per man hour is a wildly low estimate. Hard drives aren't small and are rather noticeable. They can also narrow their search space by knowing which trucks were in the area at that time.
The rights of parents to raise their children their own are not, and never should be absolute. If someone decides the proper punishment for a messy room is violent rape we all agree the law should get involved. If you choose to not vaccinate your child and they get sick your actions caused them physical harm. In that situation the parents damn well should be responsible.
You should be happy if it catches on in China because you live on the same planet. The rate China has been accelerating their coal burning capacity should worry everyone.
Slashdot Mirror
Mossad agents might be aware of the CIA's actual capabilities, the bureaucrat they are trying to flip in some other department might not.
No, not only counting POWs. It happened on a smaller scale and is less talked about, but there were a large number of US citizens of German descent in internment camps.
About 11,000 people of German descent were placed in internment camps. We also provided the internment facilities for several Latin American countries.
Leaving out the second part of that sentence alters the meaning. The are reasons for, like catching criminals, and reasons against, like creating an overbearing police state with no regard for citizen privacy. You can't do a cost benefit analysis if you won't look at the costs and benefits.
If you can't see someone already in the road, you aren't in control of your vehicle. The facebook stuff is added evidence, not the main issue.
4 unexcused absences doesn't imply that they are in any other way problematic.
I think you may be way off base with the Midwest comment. Remember the Midwest is home to the Cleveland and Mayo Clinics. Neither of those have been slacking in the electronic health records area.
Even a lot of the Facebook junkies I've met have a personal line they draw around some medical information wher it won't be divulged publicly. They might tell the world about smoking a bowl and downing a fifth of whiskey before grandma's funeral, but they are a lot less likely to mention a positive STD test.
They could just go with the fact that he might be right that Google is worth watching closely, but fucking batshit insane for his reasons.
No, Foxnews is anti Democrat. When a Republican held the Whitehouse they were rather pro-government.
If you think there aren't waiting lists and rationing of care under the US system you are missing out on what life is like for a huge chunk of the country.
People may not be able to name 10 pre-code sound films, but there are plenty of well known ones, especially in the gangster and horror genres.
That may be true for some, and maybe even all of the submitters, but we don't know that. All we know about the submitters' motivation is that they chose Wikileaks. They may have chosen them simply because they are the best known leak outlet, or they may have chosen them because they love the picture of Assange on the main page. They bought into the game at one price, it isn't my place, your place, or DB's place to change the rules of that wager.
It might be preferable in your eyes, but maybe not in the eyes of the submitter.
DB looks pretty bad if he leaks the material anyway. People who submitted that information chose to submit it to Wikileaks. It would be a breach of their trust on his part to use any of that information.
The problem is that what he did may very well be legal here as well. If their laws don't cover it and ours don't we shouldn't be lobbing missles back.
The problem is that those organizations have been given a long enough leash that passing a law and cutting funding isn't sufficient. Look at the whole mess with the CIA and the Contras. A law was passed saying don't do that and the CIA kept on humming along. When an agency of the government can continue its operations against US law and without traditional funding sources there is no legislative leverage left. Without the ability to control those organizations there is no representative input.
You become responsible when you had a reasonable belief that an investigation was coming. If you destroy it while no one would expect an investigation you aren't guilty of that crime.
8 pounds of garbage per man hour is a wildly low estimate. Hard drives aren't small and are rather noticeable. They can also narrow their search space by knowing which trucks were in the area at that time.
It isn't at all crazy to limit the restrictions an employer can place on an employee during hours they aren't being paid.
The rights of parents to raise their children their own are not, and never should be absolute. If someone decides the proper punishment for a messy room is violent rape we all agree the law should get involved. If you choose to not vaccinate your child and they get sick your actions caused them physical harm. In that situation the parents damn well should be responsible.
http://blisstree.com/feel/dr-stephen-walker-on-mmr-no-link/comment-page-1/
No, she couldn't. It would probably allow her to stop someone from making a Sarah Palin TV show or magazine.
Peak oil will only make oil companies more powerful at first. More limited supplies lead to higher prices.
You should be happy if it catches on in China because you live on the same planet. The rate China has been accelerating their coal burning capacity should worry everyone.